A/53/PV.1 General Assembly

Wednesday, Sept. 9, 1998 — Session 53, Meeting 1 — New York — UN Document ↗

The meeting was called to order at 3.10 p.m.
It was so decided.
It was so decided.
Mr. Didier Opertti took the Chair.

Address by Mr. Didier Opertti, President of the General Assembly at its fifty-third session

The President [Spanish] #24412
I would like with my first words to express sincerely and with emotion what a great honour it is for my country, Uruguay, to have been nominated by consensus — I emphasize, by consensus — by the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States to preside over the fifty- third session of the United Nations General Assembly and to have subsequently received the endorsement of this body. I wish to convey my country’s deepest gratitude to all of you and to extend my personal commitment to work with the 185 delegations that make up this body, with a view to conducting business in a manner in keeping with the responsibilities that the Charter and the rules of procedure of the General Assembly assign to the President. I must not fail to mention here that the honour and responsibility of presiding over the General Assembly have been conferred on my country, Uruguay, a country of open borders and a full member of the Southern Cone Common Market (MERCOSUR), a country which won its political independence in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Since then Uruguay has presented itself to the world without inappropriate ambitions or political prejudices and as a proponent of a steadfast internationalist vocation based on peace, tolerance and mutual respect, all under the protective guarantee of the rule of law. Uruguay cast its foundational vote in favour of the creation of this singular phenomenon of twentieth century civilization that is the United Nations and participates today in a professional manner, even making the ultimate sacrifice in terms of Uruguayan lives in peacekeeping operations in various parts of the world. I undertake before all of you to conduct the work of the Assembly in a manner reflecting my status as a Uruguayan, which implies a humanistic, conciliatory and unprejudiced vision of the world. It is also on the basis of “we can reconcile the transparency of principles with the opaqueness of reality”. I must thank in particular the President of the fifty- second session, my distinguished colleague, Ambassador Hennadiy Udovenko of Ukraine, who has given his best efforts and has also generously briefed me on the experience he gained in his year as President, sharing with me his satisfactions and his concerns and, fundamentally, his solid trust in the future of the Organization and its strengthening, which is tantamount to placing one’s trust in peace, development and security — in sum, in the progress of the peoples that make up the United Nations. The guidance provided by Mr. Udovenko and the working group dealing with the review of the membership of and decision-making in the Security Council constitutes very valuable background and adds to the significant efforts made in that respect by his predecessors. His address marking the closure of the fifty-second session of the General Assembly is a document of substance that should be considered in all its aspects. I should like now to address the Secretary-General, Mr. Kofi Annan, to assure him once again that work will be coordinated with him and his entire team so as to ensure that the efforts and competencies of each body are successfully combined. We have been greatly impressed by the Secretary-General’s efforts to identify the scope of his responsibilities and goals and the very future of the Organization. His personal visits to our region and his contacts with heads of State there have enabled us to appreciate the role that the Secretary-General plays directly with Governments. Conducting the business of the General Assembly in the current international circumstances is an activity that can be carried out only if we can count on the commitment and goodwill of each one of us, always bearing in mind that this Organization gives rise to many high expectations among the Governments and peoples of its Member States and that we must meet these expectations decisively and in a spirit of tolerance, tirelessly seeking to achieve the necessary agreements and understandings to solve the wide The serious disruptions in financial markets and their adverse effects on national economies, even in those countries that did not give rise to this situation, in an inescapably globalized context; the dramatic resurgence of acts of terrorism and the appearance of the dialectic of force brought about by that resurgence; the nefarious effect of drugs on those who take them and a sophisticated distribution system that takes on forms of criminal organization and which involves the various stages of the drug-trafficking cycle; the increase in international crime and the insecurity of citizens; the protection needed by underprivileged individuals and peoples; the protection of nature and the environment, which are under attack; human rights in their most genuine manifestations; and, finally, the achievement of social peace — these are among the most striking challenges facing the United Nations, most of which it has already taken under its responsibility. Of course, this is not to forget the support to development, cooperation in the fields of education, science and technology, the fight against disease, and many other examples. These include the codification and development of international law, a task as silent as it is wide-ranging and effective. These are just some of the items that cannot be left out of the current international agenda of the United Nations by virtue of its essentially multilateral nature. The San Francisco Charter of 1945 was a response to the determination to avoid war, and the structure of the Organization and the integration and competence of its bodies were geared to that end. But today, further consideration must be given to the issue of redesigning and agreeing on a new United Nations, and the current 185 Members must conclude the essential agreements that, on the basis of respect for justice and international law, will make every Member State feel unreservedly responsible for the preservation of those values, without which neither the United Nations nor any other international organization would have any real importance or representativeness. To assert that the United Nations is a composite of the entire world would perhaps be a reductionist and inaccurate simplification. However, it would be extremely difficult to imagine a world without the United Nations or The task of reforming the Charter, on which an open- ended working group has been engaged under the provisions of a resolution adopted by the General Assembly in 1995, is taking place in that context. That is also the context in which expectations are expressed and appeals for greater participation are made by countries — above all by their peoples — that have placed in the United Nations most of their hopes for greater democratization and for a better, more balanced, more secure, more equitable world which, while acknowledging historical, religious, cultural, economic, scientific and technological differences, can give rise to agreements at a basic level and take into account the person as an individual, or organized within society, as the epicentre of programmes and action and above all as their inspiration. We believe that this last factor, which could be regarded as abstract or even to some degree unreal or lacking in pragmatism, acts as the compass for an international community that daily displays signs of almost magical modernity but which, with respect to fundamentals, also reveals alarming reversals that bring the international situation to levels of contradiction that oblige us to rely on ethical values and basically shared responses. Under the Charter, the Security Council has primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and must act on behalf of Member States in carrying out its duties in accordance with that responsibility. Appropriate coordination is therefore required between the General Assembly and the Security Council, as a key principle governing their relationship, so that the acts of both bodies carried out within the framework of their competence can be regarded as the shared resources of the Organization with its current form of decision-making. This does not imply, in and of itself, either a positive or a critical evaluation of the institutional structure, which dates from more than half a century ago; nor is it an obstacle to the review that is already fully under way. It should be added that that half-century produced the most spectacular scientific and technological advances, and the political transformations that have occurred at both the national and the international levels in the past decade have been so intense and dynamic they have not been accompanied by similarly rapid institutional development. It is perhaps appropriate to recall here that the problems that the Organization faces today differ from those of the past. In the past 10 years, only half a dozen of the more than 100 conflicts that breached international peace and security were territorial conflicts. However, in some cases these conflicts became attacks on the security of individuals and the stability of institutions, as well as, on occasion, on the peace of entire regions of the world. Creating a favourable climate for consideration of these issues in a way that is progressive, promoting an animus societatis among all Member States, is perhaps our main goal. I shall put my presidency at the service of that goal, excluding no State and in accordance with the Charter and the rules of procedure, with your support and the assistance of the Secretariat, in such General Assembly forums as committees, commissions and working groups — in short, with the support and assistance of all those who are involved in the annual session and who experience it as a forum which, although it may be routine and announced in advance, does not thereby forfeit any of its interest or importance. Of course, the list of challenges and issues before the United Nations is not confined to the systematic and orderly cataloguing of the agenda, which is certainly indispensable and whose consideration is the General Assembly’s primary duty, so that a decision can be taken in each case. As they unfold, international events transform the United Nations into a sounding board and focus of attention for peoples and Governments, non-governmental organizations and sectors, analysts and observers, communicators and journalists and, above all, those who, full of hope, are endeavouring to transform their individual problems into a common cause. Let us all take care of this Organization, and even as we acknowledge and draw attention to its shortcomings, let us not allow scepticism to spread and make us lose heart. Let us renew our original commitment to peace and progress as essential values, without prior exceptions, sectarianism or the unproductive freezing of international relations. Let us view with the greatest clarity and realism possible the critical points that can jeopardize the Organization; but let us not confuse the substantive and the procedural, or that which is of key importance with that which is of secondary importance. However, it must also be said frankly that we will be able to do little — or very little — if States do not fulfil their commitments to the Organization. We offer the Secretary-General our cooperation in the diligent action he is taking in that connection. Let us acknowledge that the transformation of the United Nations is both quantitative and qualitative; not only must it take place within the system and its organs and In substantive terms, the condemnation of and fight against terrorism, developments in nuclear disarmament — to which Latin America bears witness — and human rights, the ongoing protection of children and women, the protection of minorities and displaced persons, appropriate trial before a competent court for those guilty of the most serious crimes against humanity and the fight against disease, marginality and extreme poverty, among other issues, are challenges that can be met only if we upgrade our tools for responding to them, both at political level and at the level of the Secretariat. In this context, we must evaluate fairly the United Nations achievements to date. The forthcoming fiftieth anniversaries of the proclamation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of the launching of the first peacekeeping operation are eloquent manifestations of the achievements we are celebrating today. Finally, attention should also be drawn to coordination between the United Nations and other international organizations; to the promotion of economic integration mechanisms as one of the most effective strategies in working to achieve peace and secure borders through trade and cooperation; and to the encouragement of all effective forms of preventive diplomacy. In conclusion, my friends, I invite all to join me for a year in moving resolutely along a path that will present us with difficulties, but will also fully open the way to hope and be based on the desire to serve a just cause.
The meeting rose at 3.40 p.m.