A/40/PV.36 General Assembly
▶ This meeting at a glance
5
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Global economic relations
Southern Africa and apartheid
Human rights and rule of law
18. Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Special ,Commemorative Meeting in Observance of the 'Lwenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Wuntries and Peoples
It is most appropriate that
in the course of this session in which we are commemora ting the fortieth
anniversary of the United Nations we should be meeting here today to observe the
twenty-fifth anniversary of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to
Colonial Countries and Peoples. It is an undeniable fact that in the period marked
by this dual commemoration truly dynamic changes have taken place in world affairs
as a result of the evolving process of decolonization. Indeed, during the short
span of 40 years the n'lmber of dependent people has diminished from some
800 million to fewer than 3 million, while the membership of this Organization has
trebled.
The sweeping changes thus brought about in the geo-politics of the world have
as their foundation the basic tenets embodied in the Charter of the United
Nations: respect for the principles of equal rights and the self-determination of
peoples and human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. In order to attain
those common purposes the United Nations resolved to be, and has become, a centre
for harmonizing the actions of nations.
The realization that accelerated international action had to be taken to meet
the rising aspirations of the peoples of dependent Territories led to the adoption
by the General Assembly in 1960 of the historic Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and to the establishment in 1961 of
the Special Committee entrusted with the task of folla~ing its implementation.
(The Pre, ident)
The work of t.:he Special Committee' over the past 25 years is a matter of
record. Suffice it to note that its central role (lS a focal point of the
conscience of the L~t~~~tional comm~~ity in support of peoples under colonial rule
greatly facilitated tne emergence of scores of newly independent States.
Our foremost concern, as r-egards the tasks that confront us today,centres on
developments in and around Namibia, which is stil under the illegal occupation of
South Africa, and the rapidly deteriorating situation in South Africa itself, where
over 24 million people continue to be denied the opportunity to realize their just
aspirations and to live under a repressive regime committed to perpetuating the , institutionalized crime of apartheid.
OUr course of action has been clearly charted in numerous decisions and
,resolutions of the security Council and the General Assembly. If we are to succeed
in preventing chaos in the region, we must act now and act decisively to bring
about the faithful implementation of those decisions and resolutions.
With regard to other colonial Territories in variouc parts of the world, I
have no doubt that, wi th the necessary co-operation of the administering Powers,
the Special Committee will continue to contribute to the a tta inment in respect of
those peoples of the purposes of the Charter and of the Declaration, in all the ir
aspects and in the shortest possible time.
(The President)
I am equally confident that the organizati~ns of the united Nations system
will, within their respective spheres of comP,etence, continue to strengthen their
programmes of assistance to the peoples concerned.
It is incumbent upon us to redouble our efforts to bring about the full and
speediest possible implementation of the Declaration and the total elimination of
the remaining vestiges of colonialism.
On this solemn occasion I should like to announce that messages have been
received from the fol.lowing Member States: China, Democratic Kampuchea, the German
De~ocratic RepUblic, Mongolia, Nicaragua, Tunisia, Turkey, the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics and Yugoslavia. Yemen has transmitted a message from the
Organization of the Islamic Conference. Some of those messages already appear in
document A/40/757, and the remainder will be distributed as addenda to it.
I call on the Secretary-General.
It is indeed fitting that as the General Assembly
marks the fortieth anniversary of its fourodation it should also commemorate the
twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
By adopting that Declaration, the General Assembly helped to accelerate the
historic march towards greater freedom promised by the United Nations Charter
15 years earlier. Evoking the themes of the Charter, it recognized that there was
a passionate yearning for freedom among all peoples who remained
non-self-governing, that those peoples had the right to self-determination, and
that by virtue of that right they should freely determine their political status
and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
Following the adoption of the Declaration, the General Assembly moved quickly
to establish a ~lpecial Committee to oversee its implemen~ation. Ever since then
the Committee hall been at the centre of the efforts of the General Assembly to
speed up the proJress of dependent peoples towards self-government and
independence. It has evolved innovative procedures and practices, whereby the
co-operation of the administering Powers was elicited. In particular, the sending
of visiting missions and the observation or supervision of democratic processes,
such as elections, plebiscites and referendums, by the United Nations, in
co-operation Wiel the administering Powers, greatly enhanced the capacity of the
Organization to promote and protect the interests of the peoples concerned.
In effect, the Declaration gave a new impetus to the essential catalytic role
~f ~he United Nations in the process of decolonization. In the quarter of a
century sinc& 1960 some 59 former colonial Territories, inhabited by more than
80 million people, have attained independence and joined the United Nations as
sovereign Members, making this Organization an almost universal one. Widespread
recognition of the United Nations achievements in this field could be heard in the
declarations and statements made in the course of the general debate during the
past few weeks.
Regrettably, notwithstanding the singular success of the United Nations in the
decolonization process, a peaceful settlement in Namibia continues to elude us, for
reasons which the Security Council has described as irrelevant and extraneous. The
special responsibility of the United Nations for Namibia imposes On all of us an
obligation to redouble our efforts to ensure a peaceful settlement of the Namibian
situation.
I should like to take this opportunity once again to urge that the Government
of South Africa, in particular, and all others in a position to help make a
renewed and determined effort to expedite the :implementation of Security Council
resolution 435 (1918), so that the people of Namibia can exercise their inalienable
right to self-detet:mination and independence without further delay.
While Namibia is of deep concern to the United Nations, there remain other
Non-Self-Governing Territories to which the Declaration applies. Certain of these
Territories are small in size, limited in resources or remotely located. There is
wide agreement, however, that those difficulties should not be allowed to retard
their political and economic advancement. On the contrary, special attention
should be paid to assisting them in overcoming their problems so that their
inhabitants can exercise the same inalienable rights as peoples elsewhere.
In the case of some Territories, the process of decolonization poses complex
and controversial problems, and in such circumstances it is essential to bear in
mind that without some degree of flexibility on the part of all concerned viable
'solutions may remain elusive and hard to attain.
The emergence of a large number of newly inaependentcountries has brought, of
course, new responsibilities for the peoples concerned and for their leaders. In
particular it has posed new challenges for the international community. Among the
most striking illustrations of those challenges to the current economic crisis
facing Africa. While many of the countries directly affected suffer from a lack of
a basic economic and social infrastructure, their people aspire to a better
economic future as a legitimate concomitant of their political independence. In an
interdependent world, the entire international community must do e~erything
possible to assist them in their efforts to achieve stable and sustained economic
and social progress. That is an objective to which the United Nations system is
fully committed. I am confident that, with properly co-ordinated efforts at the
national and international levels, we can help the Governments
concerned to fulfil the promise of independence by ensuring Q better and more
I secure future for their newly independent peoples.
We have arrived at a stage which was very difficult to envisage clearly at the
beginning of this Organization. OUr membership is now practically universal,
thanks to the fact that scores of newly independent countries have rallied to the
Charter, the beacon which guides our work. The Organization has benefited greatly
from the principle of universality and from it flows mch of the au thority for
collective action in a number of fields. Now that we have such an instrument it is
the responsibility of each one of us to make it work effectively, to gear our
efforts towards t:t:le achievement of goals that are in line with the Charter and the
obligations that flow from it. Only thus will our Organization maintain a central
xelevance to international life. Only thus will the achievements of our first
40 years, including the noble process of decolonization, endure and blossom fully
in a world of peace, justice and human advancement.
The PRESmmT (interpretation from Spanish): I call on Mr. Abdul Koroma
of Sierra Leone, Chairman of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to
the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial
Countries and Peoples.
Mr. KOaClm. (Sierra Leone), Chairman of the Special Committee on the
Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of
Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (Special Committee of 24): Forty
years ago the drafters of the Charter of this Organization, iDbued with belief in
the equality of human beings and with the conviction that the peoples of
Non-Self-Governing Territories have an inalienable right to self-determination,
~at colonialism in whatever form represented a denial of fundamental human rights
and a manifestation of injustice, proclaimed that one of the purposes of the united
Nations is
-Tb develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the
principle of equal rights, and self-determination of PeOples,·
and prescribed a specific role to be played by this Organization to enable the
peQ~les of Non-Self-Governing Territories to exercise their right to
self-determination and Ultimately to put an end to colonialism in all its forms and
manifestations.
Concomitant with the basic principles enshrined in the Charter and in response
to the yearning aspirations of dependent peoples for political freedom and economic
advancement, the General Assembly in 1960 adopted the now famous Declaration on the
Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. This Declaration
simultaneously signified a reaffirmation by the community of nations of faith in
the dignity <m.d worth of the human person, while giVing hope and faith to millions
of people throughout the world who were still living under colonial rule.
Therefore, as we review the pace of decolonization over the past twenty-five
years, we can justifiably take pride in the fact that, as a result of the
continuing process of decolonization, this Organiztion is today far more
representative, far closer to the goal of universality and a stronger body than at
its crea\tion four decades ago. Indeed, as its membership has increased, 'cbe role
(Hr. Koroma, Chairman, Special Committee of 24)
of the United Nations in support of dependent pooples has been exemplary and often
crucial, and dependent peoples have continued to invest their hopes and trust in
this Organization. This role reflects the commitment of the United Nations which
the Declaration symbolizes.
The results of tireless and unremitting efforts during the past twenty-five
years are to be seen in the fact that over 150 million people of some 50 former
colonial Territories have emerged from dependent status during that period, and the
majority of those new nations have since joined the membership of the United
Nations. The Special Committee, to which the General Assembly ass igned the task of
examining the application of the Declaration and making suggestions and
recommendations in that regard, has played an important role in that process.
During the second decade after the adoption of the Declaration, and thanks to
the efforts of the Special Committee, -we witnessed a quickening of the pace of the
process of decolonization, and some 25 Territories emerged as free and independent
States. These positive developments clearly demonstrated the fact that neither
repression nor violence could arrest the historically irreversible tide of freedom
and that colonial and alien domination of peoples was doomed to irrevocable
failure. It is ultimately on the basis of the freely expressed wishes of its
inhabitants that the destiny of a colonial territory will be decided.
The positive results achieved in the process of decolonization elsewhere
during the past 25 years remain overshadowed by the grave situation still
prevailing in Namibia. Despite efforts on the part of the international community,
as institutionalized by the United Nations, the people of the Territory have still
not achieved their basic rights and fundamental freedoms. At this stage of the
Namibian conflict, the international community must resort to every available means
to ensure that the Namibian people exercise their legitimate right to
(Kr. Koroma, Chairman, Special Committee of 24)
self-determination and independence. Furthermore, it must continue to give its
unequivocal IIDral, political and material support to· the Namibian people, under the
leadership of their national liberation movement, the south-West Africa people's , Organization (SWAPO).
As we take stock of our accomplishments over the past twenty-five years, we
are keenly aware of the fact that some 3 million people still remain under colonial
rule, over one-third of whom live in Namibia, under a very reprehensible fot'm of
repression. Only when the true aspirations of all dependent peoples are fUlfilled
and colonialism has been eradicated from the face of the earth, can the United
Nations afford to feel a full measure of satisfaction. To say this is not to
underestimate the considerable achievements of our Organization. Rather, it is to
recognize and stress the important unfinished business before the world community.
As we move closer to the day when the last vestiges of colonialism will be
eradicated from the face of the earth, it is necessary, now more than ever, to
ensure that the genuine interests of the inhabitants of those remaining Territories
continue to be of p~amount concern. We must do our utmost to bring about the free
and unrestricted conditions which would enable the peoples concerned to express
their true aspirations and, at the same time, ensure that the national unity and
the territorial integrity of those Territories are fUlly respected and safeguarded.
On behalf of the members of the Special Committee, I wish to reiterate to the
Assembly the Committee's resolute commitment and determination in continuing to
dddo its utmost in the search for the most suitable ways and means for the full and
speedy implementation of the Declaration.
Before concluding, I wish, in all solemnity, to pay a special tribute to the
thousands of known and unknown heroes who have sacrificed their lives in the cause
of freedom, justice and independence. Most certainly, on this occasion our
thoughts turn to many a great African leader of liberation, such as
Eduardo Mondlane and Amilcar Cabral. OUr tribute also goes to those in southern
Africa who have been subjected to persecution far i:iie cause of freedom, and for ta'ie
principles to the realiz~tion of whi~~ we all aspireo
On this fortieth anniversary of the United Nations and on the twenty-fifth
anniversary of the Declaration, let us pledge anew our determination to assist
effectively all colonial peoples in the attainment of their right to
self-determination and independence in accordance with resolution 1514 (XV).
The PRFSmENT (interpretation from Spanish): I now call on His
Excellency, Major-General Joseph Garba of Nigeria, Chairman of the Special
Committee against Apartheid, who will be speaking on behalf of the Group of African
Countries.
Mr. GARBA (Nigeria), Chairman of the Special Committee against
Apartheid: On behalf of the Special Committee against Apartheid and in my capacity
as Chairman of the African Group for the month of October, I should like to convey
our deep appreciation for the invitation extended to our Committee to participate
in this important meeting being held to cormnemorate the twenty-fifth anniversary of
the adoption of the historic resolution 1514 (XV) entitled "The Declaration on the
Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples".
This Declaration is rightly considered a landmark in the history of the united
Nations, for through it tremendous progress has been made in the difficult and
painful task of decolonizaiton. Such progress has resulted in the attainment of
national independence by a large number of States all of whom have since taken
their rightful place in the international community of nations. The increase in
the membership of our Organization has reinforced the principle of universality
from which it derives its strength.
Committee against Apartheid)
Despite this laudable achievement, however, a sizeable number of territories
are under colonial subjugation, and the peoples of those Territories are being
denied the opportunity to exercise their inalienable right to self-determination.
It is highly regrettable that the efforts of t:."ie United Nations to ensure that all
peoples are given the opportunity to exercise the inalienable right to
self-determination are being frustrated. SOuth Africa and Namibia have a special
status among those States.
The Special Committee against Apartheid and the African Group are particularly
disturbed by the situation in southern Africa, where the indigenous black
population' of South Africa and Namibia, which constitutes the overwhelming
majority, continues to be subjected to the degrading and harrowing experience of
apartheid domination. The perpetrator of this dual act of criminality is the
racist minority regime in pretoria, aided and abetted by its Western allies. The
brutality and ruthl"ssnass of that regime is well known to this Assembly, and I
would not want to dweD on this.
The events recently unfolding in SOuth Africa have given us cause for hope and
concern. We are more hopeful than ever because we see the foundation of the
apartheid system crumbling, which gives a clear indication that the years, if not
indeed the days, of apartheid are numbered. At the same time we are gravely
concerned that the regime has redoubled its brutality and ruthlessness, and its
imposition of the so-called state of emergency last summer has contributed to
this. The continuing wave of massacres of defenceless black men and women, and
even children, is gathering new force. It is acknowledged even in the regime's
official account that about 800 black people have been killed by its police and
military machinery in the past l2 months. Thousands are languishing in detention
without trial and hundreds are being tortured daily. Their only crime is that they
Committee against Apartheid)
seek to exercise their right to self-determination, .,hich the united Nations
declared to be inalienable 25 years ago when it adopted the Declaration whose
anniversary we are celebrating today.
The situation is not much diffarent from the pathetic one prevalent in
Namibia, a Territory for which South Africa's Mandate was terminated 19 years ago,
but over which SOuth Africa has continued to exercise authority. SOuth Africa's
continued illegal occupation of Namibia, in violation of relevant resolutions and
decisions of the General AssemQly and the Security Council, is a serious challenge
to the United Nations. As the fortieth anniversary is commemorated, serious
thought should be given to this unprecedented challenge to the authority of our
Organization. Namibia remains a classic colonial ptoblem, and should be seen as
such in the efforts to resolve it. The attempts to portray it in contexts
different from that must be repudiated.
The racist regime has defied the international community successfully and with
impunity, and one cannot help wonder ing why tha t has been poss ible. The obvious
answer is that it is protected by the Western allies. The regime has been
continuously shielded by those allies, particularly those that are permanent
members of the Security Council. The Council's attempts to take adequate measures
against the regime have been frustrated on countless occasions through the use of
the veto by those members. With this immunity accorded it, the regime has not
stopped at dominating and subjugating the blacks in South Africa and Namibia but
has in fact gone a step further by launching unprovoked armed attacks against
indepr "ldent neighbouring States. Such acts of aggression have twice in the past
four weeks been the subject of Security Council meetings.
In the face of this arrogant intransigence, what must the international
community do? The General Assembly has made numerous calls for the imposition of
(Mr. Garba, Chairman, Special
Committee against Apartheid)
sanctions under Chapter VII of the Charter, but the Security Council has not been
able to act because of the positions of the two ardent supporters of the racist
regime. It is e matter for deep regret that those same countries, which often
proclaim the superiority of their values of freedom and democracy and which have
arroga ted to themselves the apostleship of del1k)cratic choice, should become the
celebrated defenders of such a pariah regime as that in Pretoria because of narrow
economic expediency and short-sighted strategic considerations.
It is my fervent hope that those States will reconsider their positions and
join the majority' of Member States in order to facilitate action by the Security
Council to expedite the decolonization of Namibia and the eradication of
apartheid. No occasion seems more suitable than this session, which marks not only
the fortieth anniversary of our Organization but also the twenty-fifth anniversary
of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and
Peoples.
I call on Mr. Noel Sinclair
of Guyana, Acting President of the united Nations Council for Namibia.
Mr. SINCLAIR (Guyana), Acting President of the United Nations Council for
Namibia: I wish to express the appreciation of the United Nations Council for
Namibia for the invitation extended to us to attend this special connnemorative
plenary meeting in observance of the twenty-fif~~ anniversary of the Declaration on
the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
In observing this twenty-fifth anniversary the General Assembly is celebrating
what is one of the more successful aspects of the work of this Organization. This
Declaration is not only the freedom charter of peoples under colonial domination~
it has also laid the groundwork for the development of law in some of the most
vital areas of the relations between States and peoples•
(Mr. Sinclair 6 Acting President, Un!ted Rations Council for Namibia)
The adoption by this Assellbly in 1960 of the Declaration on decolonization was
a historic step in the development of international law with regard to
self-determination. Whereas in the Charter the self-determination of peoples is
stated as a principle, the Declaration of 1960 proclaims that self-determination is
a right which all peoples possess.
The De.claration itself did not confer the right of self-determination. That
right, like other rights, predates that Declaration; it predates even the creation
of this Organization.
The evolution in law which has taken place following the adoption of the
Declaration in 1960 has been clear and unambiguous. Since decolonization is more
than a political phenomenon, in analysing that evolution it is both relevant and
necessary to recall rela ted decisions of this Assembly, such as the adoption of the
Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights and, of course, the International Convention on the
SUppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
Together these instruments, including the Declaration of 1960, reflect a
generalized awareness by the international community that colonialism constitutes a
denial of human rights and of fundamental political freedoms. They reflect that
awareness in a nurmer of rules, which provide, among other things, that the fate of
a territory should be determined by the people who live in that telrritory, that the
resources of a territory are owned and should be controlled by the people of that
territory and consequently that the exercise of such control is an essential aspect
of the exercise of political sovereignty" and that the pursuit of racial policies
to perpetuate political domination is a violation of international law. OUr
8ecret"ary-General was therefore correct when be stated, in declaring open the 1985
meetings of the Special C~ttee:
"The United Nations is entitled to feel a measure of pride for creating an
international consciousness Of the ~. ~~<:rative of decolonization and for:
mobilizing moral and political ~!.!i'port to dependent peoples in their efforts
to realize tbeir righ~ to self-determination and independence.- "-
Un!ted NationsCounci), for Namibia)
In so doing, the United Nations system and the Committee on decolonization, as
both its conscience and its activator in this regard, have rendered service of
inestimable valu~.
Indeed, no one can argue against the contention that in contemporary
international law the pursuit of colonial policies is illegal and that peoples
subjected "to colonial domination have the right to struggle to free themselves
therefrom.
Of course, we cannot forget that some of the colonial Powers, in 1960,
withheld their support from resolution 1514 (XV). These attitudes were not
surprising at the time~ in fact, they have not even yet entirely disappeared. But
it is certainly an indication of the manner in which historical attitudes have
evolved over the years that these very Powers are now expressing support, however
measured, for the objectives of the Declaration.
Yet, as we record this anniversary, let us use this opportunity to rededicate
our energies to pursuing aggressively t\'lat Lvwrt of our task whi.:h is still
incomplete - and here our attention must focus first of all on Namibia.
The bases for such action are recognized and unassailable. The General
Assembly, the Securty Council and the International Court of Justice, each acting
independently of the other two, have proclaimed that South Africa's continued
presence in the Territory is illegal and that SOuth Africa is ther~fore under
obligation to withdraw so that the people of Namibia can accede to independence.
Security Council resolution 435 (1978) provides the framework for such withdrawal
and accession. But, above all these, there is the consideration that the people of
Namibia have a fundamental, inalienable right to self-determination. That right
was proclaimed in the Declaration on decolonization in 1960. The Council for
Namibia hopes that this commemorative meeting will serve as an additional pressure
on South Africa to co-operate in implementing Security Council resolution
435 (1978) and that it will bring home to those States which, by their actions,
still give support to SOuth Africa in its continuing occupation of the Territory
the urgency of the need for them to respect the principles of international law and
of justice where Namibia is concerned.
This need for respect for the principles of justice is most dramatically seen
in the case of SOU th Africa, where the oppressed PeOple are daily, wi th growing
courage, defying the apartheid regime in their struggle even for the enjoyment of
their right to be treated as human beings. But we are hopeful for the development
of that situation, for the process by which people through the ages have freed
themselves from alien domination is inexorably at work in Sou th Africa, and the
people of that country will be free.
The decolonization agenda also includes a number of Territories with peculiar
characteristics of size, geographic location and population which will require
innovative approaches by the Special Committee and by the administering Powers
concerned. There is a consensus, however, that these factors should not constitute
an obstacle to the full implementation of the Declaration in respect of these
TerLitories, and we look forward to the early removal of their names from the
agenda of the Committee.
The Council for Namibia hopes that this observance will serve to stimulate a
total and active involvement in support of the early and complete eradication of
decolonialism from the face of the earth and the establishment of a regime of
freedom and justice - not for some but for all peoples.
The next speaker is
Mr. Dia-Allah EI-Fattal of the Syrian Arab Republic, who will opeak on behalf of
the Group of Asian States.
Mr. EL-FATTAL (Syrian Arab Republic) (interpretation from Arabic): I
have the honour of speaking today on behalf of the Group of Asian States before the
General Assembly, which is commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
This anniversary coincides with the commemoration by the United Nations of the
fortieth anniversary of its founding.
The present commemoration is an expression of the solidarity of the States
Members of the Organization and their commitment to accelerating the achievement by
all countries still subjected to foreign colonialism of their national independence
and freedom, without any preconditions. This is a commemoration in which States
renew their commitment to the implementation of the objectives and principles of
the Declaration, including the principle that all colonized countries must be
liberated. These principles were included in the United Nations Charter.
Subsequently, the well-known General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) enshrined the
principles very clearly and gave new impetus to the process of decolonization,
encouraging the struggle of colonized peoples for self-determination and
independence.
One need only glance at the list of Members of the United Nations to see
clearly that the struggle against colonialism, enshrined in the Declaration, has
had a tremendous effect on international life. The Group of Asian States benefited
greatly from that struggle, since many Territories from that region have become
Members of the international Organization, this body which the peoples of the world
regard as embodying the hopes for the attainment of freedom and independence by
millions of persons liVing under foreign colonialist rule.
Republic)
A mere glance at the list of Members of the United "Nations also makes ~lear
the increase in the number of Members. This increase shows that neither oppression
nor violence nor killing can stop the historical tide of the freedom movement. It
shows that colonial domination over peoples is doomed to failure. It shows too
that the aspirations of colonized peoples to independence and freedom cannot be
frustrated.
The fate of no colonized Territory can be decided without taking into account
the freely expressed aspirations and wishes of the people of that Territory.
It is the will of these heroic peoples and their commitment to continued
struggle that, in the final analysis, have enabled and will continue to enable
those peoples to overcome the intransigence of colonialism.
But despite the positive, excellent developments we have witnessed, it must be
noted - and this is truly sad and regrettable - that today the United Nations is
still seeking the means to ensure the fulfilment of the aspirations of millions of
persons in about 20 Territories that still do not enjoy self-government, countries
that are still subjected to exploitation. More than 4 million persons from
Palestine - this Arab country in Asia - continue to be deprived of their legitimate
rights in their homeland.
AI'ab Republic)
More than 20 million Africans in SOUth Africa and Namibia are still being subjected
to the worst forms·of discrimination, repression and racist military occupation.
In tbeir own homelands they are deprived of the right to their own nationality iSnd
are sw"jected to repression and humiliation. The area as a whole continues to be
one of the worst examples of traditional colonialism in its most extreme form.
The Countries members of the Asian Group are convinced that this commemoration
will give new impetus to the Special Committee of 24 which, under the leadership of
its Chairman, Mr. Koroma, and with the assistance of its Secretary, Mr. Tanaka, and
its officers, is working tirelessly to bring about canplete implementation of the
Declaration. We are also convinced that that Committee, with the support of the
General Assembly, will continue with its excellent work until the last vestiges of
colonialism are eradicated from our p.".anet. We hope that that will be achieved in
the shortest possible time.
I now call upon His
Excellency Mr. Guennadi OUdovenko of the Ukrainian Soviet SOcialist Republic, who
will speak on behalf of the Group of Eastern European States.
Mr. OUDOVENKO (Ukrainian Soviet SOcialist Republic) (interpretation from
Russian): I am grateful to have this opportunity to speak at this commemorative
meeting as Chairman of the Group of Eastern European States. The twentieth century
has been the era of the collapse of colonial empires and the emancipa tion of
dependent countries and peoples from their age-old status of colonia1 slavery.
Among the extremely important stages in the liberation struggle in our century were
the great OCtober socialist Revolution, the victory of the peace-loving peoples in
the Second World War and, as a result of that great victory, the establishment of
the United Nations. The United Nations Charter lists, as one of the Organization's
most important tasks, that of saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war,
of respecting the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples and
of promoting the observano2 of human rights and fundumental freedoms for all,
without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion. Those historic events
established conditions favourable to a powerful upsurge in the struggle of
oppressed and dependent peoples for national liberation.
The adoption by the United Nations in 19GO of the historic Declaration on the
Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, on the initiative of
the Soviet Union and other socialist countries, marked the beginning of a new stage
in the process of the liberation of peoples who had been living in the chains of
colonial slavery. The Declaration, which proclaimed
"the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in
all its forms and manifestations" (General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV»)
embodies such important principles as the right of all peoples to
self-determination and to determine freely their economic, social and cultural
development, and the inadmissibility of the subjection of peoples to alien
subjugation, domination and exploitation. It also condemns any attempt to disrupt
the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country, it states that
immediate steps should be taken to grant full independence to Trust and
Non-Self-Governing Territories, and it places upon all States the obligation to
observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of the Declaration on the basis of
equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of all States and respect for
the sovereign rights of all peoples.
The Declaration was a powerful stimulus and lent moral and political support
to the struggle of colonial peoples for freedom and independence. In the 25 years
since its adoption, great successes have been achieved in implementing its goals.
There has been a final collapse of the colonial empires, and from their ruins have
arisen dozens of new States. Many peoples of Africa, Asia, America and OCeania have
(Mr. OUdovenko, Ukrainian SSR)
embarked on the path of independent development and social renewal. During their
years of independence they have achieved many successes in solving complicated
tasks of State construction and in achieving economic independence.
These new States were welcomed into the international community as full
partners on an equal basis. Their international authority is growing, as is their
positive contribution to solving world problems. This is a great achievement by
the peoples of the world and an important step along the road towards the total
elimination of colonialism, which was a scandalous stage in the history of mankind.
We must note, however, that despite the significant successes of national
liberation movements throughout the world, colonialism has not been completely
eradicated. It continues to poison the international atmosphere and is a dangerous
source of tension and conflict. The stubborn resistance of the colonial Powers to
full implementation of the Declaration on decolonization has its roots in the very
nature of imperialism and in that system's political, economic and
military-strategic interests. The existence of colonialism creates conditions
highly favourable to the huge profits monopolist capital and transnational
corporations are able to gain by stealing the natural resources of peoples and by
exploiting the populations of the colonial territories. The unwillingness of the
aggr~ssive forces of imperialism to acknowledge wholeheartedly that all States have
a right to sovereignty and genuine independence, to free self-determination and
development, and the attempts of those forces to impose their will upon peoples and
continue their economic exploitation represent today one of the main threats to the
peoples of the world and create a threat to international peace and security.
That policy is the main reason why colonialism persists and why the sacred
right to self-determination and independence is still only a dream for the peoples
of some 20 countries and territories. An extremely important problem when dealing
with the matter of the final eradication of colonialism is the liberation of
(Mr. OUdovenko, Ukrainian SSR)
sou thern Africa and f primarily, ensuring genuine independence for Namibia. By
flouting numerous United Nations decisions, the racist SOuth Africa regime is
continuing its occupation of Namibia, exploiting that Territory's natural and human
resources and attempting to destroy its national liberation movement under the
leadership of the SOUth West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO), which has been
recognized by the United Nations and the Organization of African Unity, as well as
by the countries menbers of the Non-Aligned Movement, as the sole legitimate
representative of the Namibian people. For many years the Pretoria regime, with
the assistance of the United States of America and some other Western countries,
has been iq;leding the implementation of United Nations decisions on granting
independence to Nanbia. The SOcialist countries advocate the immediate exercise by
the people of Namibia of their inalienable right to self-determination and
independence, on the basis that the unity and territorial integrity of the country,
including walvis Bay and the offshore islands, must be maintained. We advocate the
immediate and complete withdrawal of the occupation forces and of the colonial
administration of SOuth Africa from Namibia, and we advocate the transfer of full
power to the people of Namibia as represented by SWAPO. Our countries sh,'lre the
conclusions set forth in General Assembly resolution 39/50 of 12 December 1984,
which strongly reiterated that the continuing illegal and colonial occupation of
Namibia by SOuth Africa, in defiance of repeated General Assembly and security
Council resolutions, constitutes an act of aggression against the Namibian people
and a challenge to the authority of the United Nations, which has direct
responsibility for Namibia until independence.
The socialist countries condemn the attempts of the Pretoria authorities to
direct the solution of that colonial problem along neo-colonialist lines, through a
so-called internal settlement and through the creation of a puppe~ regime in
Namibia. The socialist countries support security Council resolution 566 (1985)
and other United Nations decisions that reject linkage between independence for
Namibia and extraneous issues.
The basis for a political solution to the question of Namibia is Security
Council resolution 435 (1978), the immediate implementation of which must be
undertaken without any changes, any reservations or any prior conditions
whatsoever. The entire process of a Namibian settlement should be under the
constant and effective ~:,"~,ntrol of the Security Council.
In celebrating today the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Declaration on the
Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, we cannot be silent as
regards the question of the inhumane policy of apartheid, which has been extended
by the racist regime of South Africa to Namibia. We vigorously condemn that system
as a crime against mankind and as a violation of international peace and security.
The policy and the practice of apartheid are incompatible with the Charter of the
Urli ted Na tions.
Encounterin~ the unrestrained growth of resistance by the native population of
South Africa to the apartheid regime and actually losing control over the situation
in the country, the ruling circles of South Africa are attempting to strengthen
their position with the help of military adventures. There are more frequent and
more intensive acts of agq£ession by Pretoria against independent African states,
whose purpose is s imply to perpe tua te colonialism in Namibia, to maintain
domination in the region on a neo-colonialist basis and to stifle the aspirations
of the African peoples to freedom, independence and social progress.
The will of the African peoples to freedom is, hOlfever, insuperable. To
attempt to stop their forward movement on the road of progress is a hopeless,
doomed cause. We unfailingly stand at the side of the peoples of Africa, who are
defending their right independently to determine their own social, economic and
political development. We stand in solidarity with the front-line States-, who are
opposing the neo-colonialist manoeuvres of the imperialists and racists and we
decisively support the struggle of the national liberation movements in southern
Africa.
The socialist countries advocate an improvement in the entire political
atmosphere on the African continent. We also advocate the assurance of reliable
security for the young independent States of Africa. The policy of apartheid and
the aggressive actions of the Pretoria regime should be ha.lted in the most decisive
way. That is the only way we can maintain peace and ensure free and independent
development for the peoples in that region.
The United Nations Security Council should have an authoritative say in
restoring legality and order to sl.;·thern Africa. The United Nations should strive
for the full observance by all States of the embargo established b'.' the Security
Council on the delivery of arms and military equipment to the racist regime of
South Africa and the embargo against any co-operation with Pretoria in th~
production and development of nuclear weapons.
The socialist countries support the demand of the African countries and of the
Non-Aligned Movement, as well as the appeal of the General Assembly to the security
Council, i1llDediately to impose mandatory comprehensive sanctions against SOuth
Africa in accordance with Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter.
Unswervingly observing all decisions and recommendations of the United Nations
intended to isolate and boycott the Pretoria regime, our countries do not maintain
any relations of a pOlitical, economic, military or other nature with them. We
(Hr. Oudovenko, Ukrainian SSR)
condemn the policy of a number of western countries of maintaining and developing
co-operation with that regime. We condemn the policy of so-called constructive
engagement with SOUth Africa and we condemn the violation by that regime of
decisions already adopted by the Security Council and the United Nations.
We cannot fail to condemn the position of those western countries that
verbally denounce apartheid and its crimes but in fact hinder the adoption of
effective mecsures to cuzb the racists in South Africa.
It is not only in southern Africa that the provisions of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and peoples are not being fulfilled. There remains the unsolved question of the decolonization of a number of eo-callf>''; small colonial Territories. The point is not that these are .Territor..~~"' that are small in size and population~ in fact, the administering Authorities like to use those reasons to justify their refusal to grant these Territories the right to self-determination and independence. The strategic military position Of those Territories and the militaristic plans of the most aggressive circles of imperialism are the real reasons behind the stubborn attempts made by the Administering Au thorities to preserve their remaining colonial possessions. Also of a serious concern is the policy of splitting mp and annexing the strategic Trust Territory of the Pacific Islandc - Micronesia. For many years now, the islands and the peoples of Micronesia have had imposed u~~n them a free association status that is neo-colonialist in nature has been impOsed upon them. The milii:arization of Micronesia 7 and its transformation into a military nuclear base for the United States, runs counter to the aspirations of the States of the area to establish a nuclear-free zone in the southern part of the Pacific OCean. In accordance with the United Nations Charter, any change in the status of a strategic Trust Territory - and Micronesia is such a Territory - can be carried out (Hr. OUdovenko, Ukrainian SSR) only by decision of the security Council. The united Nations should continue to bear the responsibility for that Territory until its people have the opportunity to implement their legitimata right to full self-determination and independence without any hindrance. As we have pointed out, the military activities of the colonial Powers in Territories under their administration or in Trust Territories are of a particul.arly dangerous nature. Hence the United Nations lII1st, in keeping with decisions already taken, demand decisively that the colonial Powers end all military activities that are incompatible with or run counter to the Charter of the Uni ted Nations and the Declaration on decoloniza tion, including the immediate elimination of all military bases on colonial and dependent Territories. Our states support the demands of the developing countries that the elimination of colonialism be extended to the economic sphere, as well as the -demand that economic relations be restructured on a just and de1'lDcratic basis and the demand for the establishment of a new international economic order. Those just demands are being blocked by the imperialist Powers, which have decided on a policy of undermining equitable economic co-operation and of using a policy of diktat in international economic relations. That is having a very harmful influence on the development of the non-aligned States and damages all countries in the world. It is our deep conviction that the year of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples should be celebrated by decisive actions to eliminate colonialism once and for all and to liquidate racism and apartheid. The socialist countries fully acknowledge the inalienable right of peoples under the oppression of colonialism to struggle by all means available at their disposal, inclUding armed struggle, against those who suppress their legitimate aspirations to liberty, self-determination and independence. tn giving them 1IlOral, political, econClllic and other assistance, we Wish the. further successes in their just stJ:u9gle against colonialisa, racism and apartheid and for gaining and strengthening political and economic independence. The PRBSmENT (interpretation from Spanish): 1 now call on Hr. Alfredo Canales of Chile, who will speak on behalf of the Group of Latin American States. Mr. CANALES (Chile) (interpretation from Spanish): The dynamics of history have shown that because of his origins as a social creature man instinctively seeks independence for his community and seeks to earn a livelihood for himself and for the group of which he is a part. That characteristic of human nature has prompted nations, throughout history, to throw off the colonial yoke laid upon them by other peoples and to seek their own identity. On the long road to the achievement of those goals - goals born with the birth of mankind - peoples had to appeal to the courage and wisdom of their most enlightened sons. That stage was marked by the valour of warriors. We, the countries of Latin America, are no exception to that rule of history; more than 160 years ago we fought with sacrifice, vigour and dedication to attain our identity. Many of the greatest Latin Americans of the time laid down their lives for this noble cause, and today we proudly venerate and pay a tribute to their courage. But more often than not, this heroic course was of necessity sown with the seeds of confrontation. Thus, the idea of an international community was gradually developed, along with an awareness that efforts had to be made to ensure that the just aims of peoples did not have to be achieved through war. When 40 years ago the world emerged from an unprecedented conflict, the survivors pledged to eradicate the scourge of war and to stand together in their determination to build a better world. But it was necessary to understand that there would be no better world and no end to bloodshed unless a civilized, peaceful way were sought for colonial peoples to achieve their independence without recourse to armed struggle. That led to international recognition of the principle of the right to self-determination, and in that framework lie the efforts of the United Nations to make it possible for nations that were once colonies to attain, through the exercise of the right to self-determination, their desired freedom. Resolution 1514 (XV) is the corner-stone of that peaceful process, and its implementation is without question the finest example of the achievements of the United Nations during its 40 years of existence. Dozens of peoples have attained their identity through the machinery of that resolution, and they are among us today as countries which are proud of the independence they achieved thanks to the Declaration. Resolution 1514 (XV) has helped peoples exercise their right to self-determination in the fullest possible way; in cases where some of them, as nations, have freely and in a sovereign manner expressed their wish not to accede to independence and to exist in a status chosen by the majority, that wish has been respected and recognized. Today we are prOUd to point to the goals attained ~hrough resolution 1514 (XV), in the implementation of which the Special Committee of 24 has played a primary role. But unfortunately there is work yet to be done. We regret to note that there are peoples denied the opportunity to attain their own identity. The most serious case is that of Namibia, where, despite international resolutions adopted by a wide variety of bodies, an archaic colonial system continues to be imposed upon the people; this is a throw-back to a past which should have disappeared long ago. On behalf of Latin America and the Caribbean, I express our solidarity with those peoples and our wish that they may soon exercise their right to se1f-determinatiun, freely and in a sovereign manner. As the commemoration of the fortieth anniversary of the foundation of the United Nations coincides with the twenty-fifth of the adoption of resolution 1514 (XV), I wish on behalf of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean to reiterate our unequivocal condemnation of all forms of colonialism, our sympathy with peoples struggling for self-determination, and our determined support for the complete implementation of resolution 1514 (XV). The PRES~DENT (interpretation from Spanish): The next speaker is Mr. Robert MCDonagh of Ireland, who will speak on behalf of the Group of Western European and Other States. Mr. McDONAGH (Ireland): It is an honour for me, as current Chairman of the Group of Western European and Other States, to speak at this celebration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of a historic document which made a significant contribution to the self-government and independence of peoples and Territories under colonial rule. The essence of the right of peoples to self-determination was, of course, expressed in Article 1 of our Charter, which specifically includes as one of the purposes of the United Nations: "To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace". The responsibilities and obligations concerning the Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, which the administering Powers accepted by joining the United Nations, are described as a sacred trust and are outlined in Chapters XI and XII of the Charter. (Mr. McDonagh, Ireland) It would seem, therefore, that our founding fathers clearly believed that only equal rights and self-determination for all peoples could help guarantee peace and prosperity for future generations. The Charter leaves no room for doubt that peace and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms are inextr icably linked. To that extent it could be said that the Charter of the united Nations ushered in the era of decolonization, although it was not until the adoption of the historic resolution 1514 (XV) and, the following day, resolution 1541 (XV), adopted the following day, that specific international documents were adopted in this regard. In a number of instances, of course, the administering Power had already begun to encourage, or even brought to its conclusion, the process leading to the free exercise of self-determination and eventual independence. Nevertheless, for many years peoples in colonial countries often looked to the United Nations as the guarantor of their national right to freedom and self-determination. To colonial peoples everywhere, therefore, the adoption of the Declaration wi thout a single negative vote constituted a landmark in the application of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in our Charter, and conveyed the promise of a world order based on those principles. Today, largely as a result of the ongoing process of decolonization, the United Nations is very mch closer to its goal of universality. The Group of Western European and other States welcomes the progress that has been achieved in this field since the adoption of the United Nations Charter and the Declaration, and notes with satisfaction the number of Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories that have attained independence and joined our Organization in the past 25 years. However, on this twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration we must not limit ourselves simply to reviewing the past and congratulating ourselves on our achievements. The question of Namibia is one of our major (Mr. McDonagh, Ireland) preoccupations. It is particularly so in view of the special responsibility of the United Nations for that international Territory and its people. There should be no doubt that the United Nations will live up to that responsibility and that the international community will not rest until the Namibian people have freely exercised those rights proclaimed in the Declaration we are celebrating today. In my capacity as Chairman of the Group of Western European and other States for the month of OCtober, I should like to take the opportunity afforded by this solemn occasion to emphasize the deep commitment of the members of the Group to promoting the ideals emodied in the Charter and reiterated in the Declaration and to seeking the implementation of the principle of equal rights and self-determination among all peoples. The meeting rose at 11.55 a.m.
I
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/40/PV.36.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/A-40-PV-36/. Accessed .