A/46/PV.25 General Assembly
▶ This meeting at a glance
2
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Global economic relations
War and military aggression
Sustainable development and climate
Peace processes and negotiations
9. ($ontinueQ) GENERAL DRBATE ADDRESS BY MR. KENNKDY A. SIMMONDS, PRIME MPNISTER OF SAIRT KITTS ARD NEVIS The PRESIDERT (interpretation from Arabic): The Assembly will first hear an address by the Prime Minister of Saint Kitts and Bevis. Mr. Kennedv A. Simmonds. Prime Minister of Saint Kitts and Nevis, was escorted to the rostrum.
I have great pleasure
in welcoming the Prime Minister of Saint Kitts and Nevis,
Mr. Kennedy A. Sinnnonds, and inviting him to address the General Assembly.
Mr. SIMMORDS (Saint Kitts and Nevis): f bring the Assembly most
sincere greetings from the Government and the people of Saint Kitts and Nevis,
and I 8-c !. it an esteemed pleasure and a distinct honour to address this our
forty-sixth session of tbe General Assembly.
I join in all sincerity with those who have preceded me in congratulating
the former President, Guido de Marco of Malta, on his skilful handling of our
past deliberations during a period of unprecedented challenges.
Then I hasten to welcome our new President, Sarnir Shihabi of Saudi
Arabia, whom I wish to assure of my country's firm support and continued
cooperation. The very astute way in which you have been guiding this session,
Mr. President, deserves our highest commendation and portends well for a
successful and fruitful forty-sixth session.
Next, I wish to pay a special tribute to Secretary-General
Javier Peres de Cuellar, who continues to serve our Organiaation with
demonstrative dignity, elegance, and excellence, amidst difficult and trying
t.lmes. HIr focur haa alwaye bean int~ornst.\onal peace and security for t,he
proplom of the world. His losdsrmhlp ham been msst.orful in a period of qrnal.
uphsavsl and tKeMM!ndOUB chsngs.
Ml. Becretsry-General. my Government and people ralute your we atand in
awe oil your indefatigsble comnitment.~ crnd we pledge our support ae you
continue to rrerve the intarnst ional conxnunlty In the prof icimnt and effect ivo
mannsr to which we hsve grown sccuatomed.
There hsve been times in the paat when tha relevancs of th@ United
Nation8 ham baen questioned. when the will of it,s Msmbsrn to be resolute in
defence of the weak haa been in doubt. Not anymore. This assembly of nations
hea acted to ensure the restoration of sovereignty to one of its smaller
Members, Kuwait, and the world looks on wPth nppreciation. Host 010
supportivs, some are still derisive, none remain indifferent. The United
Nation syatsm is experiencing its finest hour - still, it is a time of
enormous challenge and opportunity.
The vibrancy of the Assembly ia reflected in the plethora of new
Member a. Saint Kitta nnd Novia warm warmly received into thia body, and today
I deem it a plsaar~re and an honour to extend a warm welcome to the now
Member E . I welcome the Republic of Korea, our friends of long standing, and
the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. AR is well known, my Government
has conniatently advocated the admission of both countries for several years.
I welcome the Marshall Islands and Micronesia, as well as the Republics of
Estonia, Latvia, and Lith,Jania. I am pleased to assure the Government.6 and
peoples of these new Members that my Government and people will extend to them
most. active cooperation in t-he cause of world perrce and human development.
While democracy lm broaklng out all over the world, romehow the
balaagumrmd people of HaltJ continue to be denled the opportunity to breath.
the pure aJr of freedom. Wy country, Ralnt RJtte and Nevis, ancl Indeed the
entlro Caribbean cowraunlty, are deeply shocked by tha actlon of the armed
forcem in Haiti in Illegally soJ8Jnq Yresldont Jean-Bertrand Arlstlde snd
members of hia administration and umurylnq the authority of the duly
constituted Government. This monstrous and outrageous action by the HaJtlan
mllltery is an unscceptable reyudlatlon of the declared ~111 of the people of
Haiti, whJ.ch wan overwhelmingly and unambiguously manifeoted in the electJon
of December 1990.
Saint Kilts and Nevis, and lndaed the entire Caribbean conwnunJty,
unreservedly condemn this flagrant aaaault on tho unfolding democratic proceas
in Haiti, and demand the reetoration of constitutional order and of
Father Ariatide to the presidency of the Republic.
The Cnribbean conwnunlty nae ln the past called for concerted
international assistance to consolidate democratic gains in Haiti, We repeat
that call today. The Caribbean community is working within the Organization
of Pmerican Statea to restore democracy to Haiti.
I call on this body, the United Nationa, which haa acted deciafvely in
other areas of crisis, to move with urqency and purpose to ostracise the
illegal regime in Haiti and to take all appropriate measures to restore
democracy and the constitutionally elected Government in Haiti.
The people of Haiti cry out in anguish to the world c0mmunit.y for
de1 ivarance. Let ua not fail. them t.his time.
I w.imh to focum today on t.ho l ubjoct.. of development through pmce am the
bamim for the now internetional order.
Uast-Uemt tenmlon ham abated! the merlin We11 ham fallan bonsath thes
ruryo of Ireedomr Kuwelt hem bean l!beratedj souw challengom to democracy are
bolnp thwartodl end diplomacy and negotiation are IIIOKO and more belag acropted
am altarnatlvem to vlol~nca end bloodshed.
(cltdiiRWK?~81, ..8AiPt Rift8 AAQ mvia 1
Ths initiat.lvs t.skaa by Prasidmut Aunh of the Unltod Stntea of America to
implement II unklat.ersl reduction of nuclear weaponm Is timely nncl welcome.
The rasponoe of ?rssident. Gorbachev of the Soviet. Union 1s a furt.her
siqniblcant. contribut.ion to the reduction of intarnstionsl tenriona. He muat
now ~oize the opportunity of the moment. and work towsrdn the t.otal elimlnstion
ol nut lenr wespona.
However, world peace must. not be vlswad only in terms of the absence of
war Id wer, Cha elir.,irration of East. West tension or the achlavement of
cease--firea. The concept of world peace must. be fnrmore fundamental and
perversive. It muat mean an acceptance of human equality and dignity, the
achievement of social justice and the global preservation of individual hwnan
riqhC.8. The world must work as assiduously at bui lding t.he foundations of
paarll (rs it. did at erecting the bastions of WAC.
The enhancement of education, the eradication of poverty, !ho reduction
of unemployment, the maintenance of good health, the provision of aifordeblo
housing, the adapting of science and technology to aocio-economic
development - these must be the dividends that flow from diverting global
financial resources away from the amnssing of armaments, to be invested in
hul. an development. This is the challenge we face. This is the new battle we
must join - and we must not fail.
The development of all our peoples throuyh peace must: be placed against
the b;lckdrop of the need for a comprehensive polit,ical set C lement. of di sput.es,
self determination through free and fair elections and full respect for
national 5overeiqnt.y. CoqeCher wit-h the repatriation and rehabi 1 itation of
c-1 i 5 p 1 a c: 0 d p e r s 0 11 I; .
(prince Uoheagd Dolkiah, -1
balanced against continuing violence, social unrest and grave civil strife in
several regions.
Horeover, three specific global issue5 present themselves. I refer here
firstly to the risk that certain development prograuases may lead to great
environmental damage. Secondly, I note that the drug menace is presenting a
lasting threat to the welfare of the young people who constitute the
productive sector of all nations. Finally, I add to these our ever-increasing
ability to cause human and material destruction. I am worried moat of all by
the fact that we do not seem to have found a way to control the development
and spread of such technology.
These issues represent security problems which are just as dangerous as
any act of open hostility. They reflect a disturbing level of uncertainty.
Despite positive global changes, they add up to a host of problems which no
one country can solve alone. They are all likely to lead to disputes. The
only way we can stop these turning into open war. I believe, is for us to act
in unity. Therefore we need to identify security concerns in a global
context. If that can be done, then we must work together to find solutions.
I see those two needs as crucial.
As I have said, I do not overlook the positive developments vre have seen
in the post-cold-war period. They have offered signs that it is possible for
us to move forward together. I think that tbe recent announcements made by
the Presidents of the United States and the Soviet Union about reducing
nuclear arms are most welcome initiatives. So are the encouraging responses
given by other nuclear Powers. They indicate that a new process is under
way. I believe that it may start to answer the repeated calls for action in
this area vhich have been made by many United Nations Members.
(Wr. sinan91zda, gad NevW
The intransigence of Itag continues to cause disquiet in the
international cormaunity. We must maintain appropriate sanctions until the
relevant resolutions of the Security Council have been implemented in full and
until the people of Irag, as well as their neighbours , can live without fear
of intimidation from either conventional or nuclear armaments.
South Africa continue8 to be another area of grave concern to us. While
we welcome the steps taken by the De Klerk Administration to dismantle the
pillars of apartheid, we must keep in mind that apartheid is not ended. Until
there is equality and respect for individual rights, regardless of race, our
objective has not been achieved. The ultimate objective must continue to be
the achievement of one person, one vote. We cannot accept one standard of
freedom and democracy for people in Europe and tbe Americas, and a lesser
standard of freedom and democracy for the people of South Africa.
The people of Saint Kitts and Nevis, and, indeed, the Caribbean
coraraunity, vi11 maintain our principled stand of continuing sanctions against
the regime in South Africa, and we oppose the wholesale lifting of sanctions
at this time. We consider the lifting of sanctions now to be premature, and
caution that it could result in delaying the inevitable end of apartheid. I
call on the international community not to retreat when the end is in sight.
I call on the international community not to abandon the oppressed people of
South Africa at this critical time, but to stand fast until justice, equality
and freedom become realities for all.
Democracy and individual rights and freedoms are all part of our
Caribbean way of life. We want nothing less for our African brothers and
sisters.
It. ir CRUI~ for deep concern t.hst pew@ and justice continua to elude the
people of Cambodia. They, t.00, have II right. to smpl rm t.o the fruit.8 of
economic devalopmant. We call for all conattuctive efforta to eontlnus until
the reechlng of n l ettlmmmnt which brinqm r.-n end to conflict and uahmrn in an
era of devolopaant.
My Government l upportr the new direct.(on towards fuadamentnl reform und
democratlsatior. In the Soviet Union. It hnn undoubtedly contributed to the
removal of East-Wa,st tensiona. E davrlopmeat that has been r-eceived with a
global sigh of relief.
I have no doubt that there will be a major mobilisation of finsncial,
technical and material ronources to nssist with the economic tranrformation of
the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This ie ns it Rhould be. Howmn~r, the
United Nations muat be particularly vigilant to ensure that the socio-economic
prablema of developing countrien. like mine, are not marqinalired and
rwlegated to the backwater of humnn develq~ment There mwst be a redirection
of resources, and a mobilixation of additional reaourceu, away from the
economy of war to the economy of development.
The United Nations must be an instrument of peacemaking and enhancement
of the quality of life. The Organization can thua direct and coordinate
responses to the developmental nee3s of small States. We need an Orc~anization
that remains commitLed to the sustained growth and development of all of its
Member States, in order to build and maintain a world partnership.
We must, therefore, commit ourselves to reinforcing the multilateral
approach to the solution of our problems. It behoves us to streqtben the
internatioaal system of wbicb the United Nations forms the nucleus. Tbe
international community must rally around the system if it is to fulfil its
obii':>tion to restore and ensme international peace and security in order
that economic and socio-cultural developmat may prosper, bloom, and bear good
fruit.
Tbe issue of development and the eaviromneat is so fundamental to the
achievement of a better guality of life that I must sddress it. It is
axiomatic that all of us share a responsibility for protecting and preserving
the environment. It seems, however, that in this regard some countries are
more egual t&m others.
In 1966, a major airline manufacturer found it necessary to destroy
630 acres of lush forest to establish a factory complex. This was a case of
development taking priorxy over environment. The significant development
value of that decision is totally accepted and unquestiomd today. On the
other side of the ledger, however, we find the disturbing tread where
environmental questions. sometimes real and sometimes imagined, are becoming
major conditionalities attached to development assistance for poor countries.
Are we to understand tbat development must take priority over environment in
developed countries, but that the emironmeat must take precedence over
development in developing countries that are being strangled by a hostile
world economic system?
The ensuring of exaviromental protection and development must not run
counter to a country's strategies for socio-economic advancement. There must
be a balance between environmental concerns and a couatry's overall
development so that environmental issues ought not to becolse a deterrent to
development in 4.b; x8oror countries.
Additionally, i% must be appreciated that environmental concerns differ
from country to country, and from region to region. In the developed world
the accent is on issues like the ozone layer, acid rain and toxic waste. In
Saint Kitts and Nevis, however, we need direct assistance in the areas of
solid and liquid waste management , marine life protection, beach conservation,
reef preservation, the prevention of coastal erosion, and the full integration
of marine resources into the national development plans.
I must at this point make particular reference to the Caribbean,
stretching from Belize to Guyana, and linked by small, island developing
States from the Bahamas to Trinidad.
We are a string of pearls linking North and South America, beautiful but
vulnerable. We are vulnerable to natural disasters. vulnerable to global
economic developments over which we have no control. We are vulnerable to an
international economic order that determines and sets at a low level the
prices of the things we sell , and escalates the prices of the things we buy.
We find ourselves consigned to a treadmill of poverty, debt, and
underdevelopment.
However, because of our location close to the Americas. and the
cross-fertilisation of cultures anti values, fuelled by the revolution in
electronics and communication, our people have developed high expectations.
We have helped ourselves considerably through individual and regional effort,
and international support.
while our location provides , on the one hand, opportunities for
development. particularly in tourism which is important for all of us, it is
also a source of great challeuge and dasger. We are also vulnerable to the
narco-terrorists, the drug traffickers. Together w must continue to wge
all-o& war OIL these purveyors of death aud destruction. We continue to need
zuore assistauce in reducing demand through educatioa, health care. and
rehsbilitation, and w must intensify our combined efforts in the area of
interdiction and enforcement.
ht this time when the attention of the international comunity is taken
up bp events of smuueental proportions throughout the world, I feel I must
endeavour to keep the development concerns of islauci developiag nations on the
interuatioual agenda.
Ihere have also been positive developments in our region in relations
betw24n neighbours. I must cowmsnd the Govermnents of Belire and Guatemala on
having reconciled their differences in the interest of good neighbourliness.
The declaration that Guatemala recognises Belise as an independent State not
only allows Belire to participate fully in the Ceutral hwrican integration
process, but gives a tremendous boost to Caribbean-central Americas relations.
Uy Goversment looks with optimism to the prospect of both Governments’
continuing negotiations so as to iron out remaining difficulties, in the
interest of peaceful coexistence between the two countries.
In addition, my Government comnends the United Wations and the
Organiration of Americas States'on the role they have played and will continue
to play in providing avenues through which wrhable solutions can be found to
territorial disputes.
At this tise is our history we are seriously challenged to bring an end
to conflicts and to stimulate a resurgence of human develapwnt. Within the
parsmeters of this broad objective, there must be a place for special
attention to bo given to the welfare of our children. We gave that process
rpecrial emphasis when we met here at the special Heads of State and G~vernmnt
SW ml t for Children. Let. ue conmit. and rededicate ourselvea to rise t.o fh~)
challenge of making peace mean develqment for people everywhere, but let us
make it specially meaningful for our children as WQ provdde For their health.
educational, recreational and psychological needs. In this we CAII have no
nobler objective.
mPReSII)ENT (interpretation from Arabic): On behalf of the
General Assembly, I wish to thank the Prime Minister and Minister for Poreiqn
Affairs of Saint Kitts and Nevis for the atatement he haa just made.
P_~B.JQJ@&~~J~QJ,,&~ (Brunei Darussalam1r Sir, I should like to
conqratulato you upoa your election an President of the Assembly at. this
session. I am very pleased to see such a distinguished office held by a
representative of our close friend, Saudi Arabia. May I also express my
appreciation to the outgoing President, Uuido de Marco. At the same time, I
particularly wish to thank the Secretary--General for the excellent work he has
done, often under very difficult circumstances.
Brunei Darusaalam would also like to welcome seven new Member8 of the
United Nations: the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of
Micronesia and the Republics of Estonia, Latvia and I.it.huania.
Brunei Darussalam still maintains what I described here last year as
“cautious optimism”. However , we have seen a number of problems which demand
early solution. We cannot put them off Until a later date. They are bound to
affect the positive trends which have started to bring about a new order in
Europe. Unleae we can try to do something about them urgently, they are qoirlq
to becoma very grave indeed.
We can see that there* is already much uncertainty in many parts of the
world. The start of a ueu world order has perhaps helped to remove some of
the outward signs of long. term problems; but it. has not yet shown us how to go
about dealing uith the problems themselves. Their basic causes are still with
UR. I am very much encouraged by the many positive efforts which have been
made to create a peaceful and stable world. Nevertheless, I also think that
there is a real need to prevent old probl.ems recurrinq.
The cold war may indeed be over, but we can see that many nations arc
st.ill very worried ahout their sfbcur ity. Not.ecl pal it ical gnins must h
(prince Uoheagd Dolkiah, -1
balanced against continuing violence, social unrest and grave civil strife in
several regions.
Horeover, three specific global issue5 present themselves. I refer here
firstly to the risk that certain development prograuases may lead to great
environmental damage. Secondly, I note that the drug menace is presenting a
lasting threat to the welfare of the young people who constitute the
productive sector of all nations. Finally, I add to these our ever-increasing
ability to cause human and material destruction. I am worried moat of all by
the fact that we do not seem to have found a way to control the development
and spread of such technology.
These issues represent security problems which are just as dangerous as
any act of open hostility. They reflect a disturbing level of uncertainty.
Despite positive global changes, they add up to a host of problems which no
one country can solve alone. They are all likely to lead to disputes. The
only way we can stop these turning into open war. I believe, is for us to act
in unity. Therefore we need to identify security concerns in a global
context. If that can be done, then we must work together to find solutions.
I see those two needs as crucial.
As I have said, I do not overlook the positive developments vre have seen
in the post-cold-war period. They have offered signs that it is possible for
us to move forward together. I think that tbe recent announcements made by
the Presidents of the United States and the Soviet Union about reducing
nuclear arms are most welcome initiatives. So are the encouraging responses
given by other nuclear Powers. They indicate that a new process is under
way. I believe that it may start to answer the repeated calls for action in
this area vhich have been made by many United Nations Members.
I am also particularly 9lsd about the ray In which the United Net iona hao
become involved in tryinq to help salvo regional conflicts. I am pleastid t-o
sea ua beyinninq to address 9lobaI issues t.ogethrr. Howvm r # the final
succnsa of tha United Nations dependa on the attitude of its Member count.r lea
and organisations. It is up to all of us to contribute to building up the
type of United Nations we want to see. tvsry Member of thin body should take
an active part in helping to define its role. In this way, we can be
confident that the United Nations will not see solutions to problems from
limited perspectives.
The post-.cold--war period is 8 tima to call upon Mombar Staten to do
everything possible to reach a aharnd uaderstnnding on how bilateral and
regional problems aro to be resolved. It ia perhaps our most urgent need.
Without it there can be no agreement on what must be done to address the
problems of social and economic davelopmentr there can also be little common
ground when it comes to deciding what we muat do to protect the environment.
OLher movos call upon us to recognize that the scope of our current
problems demands a broad approach. To this and, we must encourage better
understanding, cooperation and interdependence. As the Persian Gulf war has
shown, the end of the cold war vi11 not mean tho end of regional disputes
vhich affect internat.ional peace. More positively, however, it has
demonstrated the need to cooperate. It has shown that we are capable of
working toget.hec towards United Nations goals when a common tShreat to our
global community arises. It. has also shown that we can do that eveu though
bilateral and multilateral disputes mny continue to disrupt regional peace.
In this rognrd, I think that regional Jnmtitutione have II tnoat important.
1010 to play in makinq sure that ragionx remain atabln. Over t.ho pnat two
yoarx we havn baen pleased to obeorva thix taking place in Europa, ArrwPrJca,
Africa, Aria and the Pacific.
In particular, wo welcome recent. developmenta Jn Cambodia no the psrtiea
and countrimx concerned with the conflict work towards Jtc final comprahenmivs
settlement.
In Korea, we believe that ths re9ional frrvnewnrk for international
cooperation which has promoted North-South dialogue has been moist valuable.
In Gouth Africa, we have seen how countries end international
organixationx finally persuaded the Pretoria re9ime to set about removing
apartheid.
Similarly, in the Widdla East, the JnJt.JatJvex taken by the United
St.atea, together with the actions of the international community and regional
institutions, have brought. ux some renewed hope. We feel that a lasting peace
and a juat settlement within the terms of Security Council
reaolutiona 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) may ultimately be achieved.
There mre of course many other areas of pressing concern. I think that
countries can contribute much towards imprc)vi j.zJ them through their various
regional or international associations. I feel that it is important. to
recognize that regional dialogue clerves to increase the aonne of security felt
by all parties. It will certainly help to ensure that one Gsat.ion’s -Mcurity
concern doea not bacome another-‘s security threat. In summary. T taolieve that
8 situation whereby regional bodies assert increasingly important roles in
support of Unit.ed Nnt.iona ohjectivaa is Q rua1iat.i~ vision.
Today I have offered some thoughts On problems which are still
outstanding security concerns despite a new political climate. In their light
I have also stressed that we have already in place some practical means of
addressing them. We need to use them. We should accept that cosrson global
problems require unified action. We should not have to wait for bilateral or
regional differences to be settled before taking such action. Responsible
regional organisations can be of great assistance in deciding what form it
should take. This situation, however, can only be brought about if nations
demonstrate their palitical will when it comes to supporting international
principles.
If this is done, a climate of cooperation and negotiation can truly
emerge from a commoa perspective. I contend that the welfare and security of
all people are increasingly served by a strong United Nations in which
regional organisations play vital supporting roles. I believe that the means
I have outlined are available to us. We can indeed create a situation whereby
individual Member nations see solutions to problems in terms of collective
security. Erunei Darussalam will lend its fullest support to all moves
designed to encourage such a process.
Miss CWIEPE (Dotswana): Mr. President, many speakers who preceded
me to this rostrum have been more than eloquent in describing the rare
qualities of leadership you bring to the presidency of the forty-sixth session
of the General Assembly. What more can we add other than to assure you, Sir,
that we too repose our confidence unstintingly in your ability to steer the
deliberations of this momentous session to a fruitful conclusion. And we
congratulate you. most sincerely, on your election to this high office.
(w Cbieue, Botswana)
The distinguished Foreign Minister of Malta lived up to our expectations
during his tenure of office. We salute him for a job well done.
We welcome to our midst the seven new Members that have just joined the
United Nations. We wish them well. An increase of seven new Members can only
enhance the strength and vitality of our Organisation and advance it further
towards universality.
Under the stable and purposeful leadership of our indefatigable
Secretary-General, Mr. Javier Perez de Cuellar, the United Nations has
continued to respond forcefully and creatively to the fast-changing panorama
of human history. The past year has been particularly challenging, and even
daunting, for our Secretary-General and for the United Nations. The Gulf
crisis which was in full bloom during our last session, early this year
burgeoned into a full-scale war whose consequences are still reverberating.
Thankfully, a renascent United Nations was not found wanting in its response
to the crisis; aggression has been defeated; the Emirate of Kuwait has been
liberated. We salute the Secretary-General under whose leadership the United
Nations has been given a new lease on life.
As the old world of nuclear terror, political tyranny and ideological
confrontation gives way to the new world in which our major preoccupation is
whether we have the capacity "to execute the increasingly versatile projects
of peace", (A/46/1, uaoe 4) to quote the Secretary-General's report
nmw world oramr hmr become very crucial intleoa. Am thm Socrotsry-Oonmrsl ‘m
rmport ala0 rtatom. “The l ffectivanmrm of the Unltod Nationr can no Jongmr be
In doubt”. (ibid.)@
-----_----
* Mr. Gyaw (Myamar ), Vice-President, took t.he Chair.
04iss chi~%otswsn@)
what continues to be in doubt, in our view, is our readiness, we the
Members of the Organisation , to give th8 United llatione the wherewithal to
perform its escalating tasks. The peace that is breaking out everywhere in
the world needs nurturing while, at the Sam8 tim8, new conflicts now erupting
as a cons8quence of the precipitate expiration of the old order are
threatening the new world order in its infancy. ABd we expect the UBit8d
Nations, trammelled by unpaid arrear's and late payment of contributions, to
rise to the occasion, to police peace and mauage conflict with an empty
treasury. Mission impossible!
Nevertheless. the world is changiBq for the better. A new cycle of
history whose character we must all participate in shaping Baa begun.
Throughout the globe today the co-n maB and woman are insisting on regaining
mastery of their destiny. Multi-party democracy has become the eouonon clarion
call of mankind, a triumphant affirmation of the phenomenon of peOp188'
power. Be it in Africa, Eastern Europe or elsewhere in the world today, an
inexorable process of renewal is in progress.
And yet as the struggle for democratic pluralism intensifies Bew
conflicts arise while old and hitherto suppressed aBtagoBisms are set free.
The historical excesses of extreme nationalism and ethnocentrism are
threatening the peaceful evolution of the new world order we all seek to
nurture. Change is not coming peacefully everywhere. It rarely does. Our
hearts go out to the people of Yugoslavia and other Eastern European States
that are caught in the throes of difficult and painful transitions. This is
what the Secretary-General , with his usual candour and precision, calls "a
unique justaposition of promise and perils" (&/46/l. B. 5).
fn our view, bowwet, the prolais8 is transcendent. A world free of the
threat of nuclear holocaust and political tyranny aad totalitarianism is not
necessarily bereft of conflict, but it is tbe beat insurance for peace and
tranquillity smong nations and peoples. There is the understandable fear and
axuiety that we bave begun the era of monopolarity, the dotnination of the
world by on8 Super-Power unrestrained by th8 checks and balances of
bipolarity, and that more tyranny and fear is likely to be perpetrated by the
lone super-Power in the new world order. Such apprehensions are
understandable, even as ve fervently cherish the hope that with a strengthened
United Nations and the ascendancy of economics as the locus of power the new
vorld order will be one characterised by democratic multipolarity driven by
interdependent economic competition. And it must be emphasised #at a durable
neu world order can result omlp from our united efforts, not from a lone
super-Power's fiat.
The agenda of the forty-sixth session is, like its predecessors, long and
varied. This is an indication that we still have a long vay to go to resolve
the many problems that confront our Organisation. It is hoped that the new
mood at the United Nations vi11 enhance our capacity to search for solutions
to these problems.
We have seen hov successful the United Nationa can be if its endeavours
in the service of peace enjoy the support of its membership in both the
Security Council and the General Assembly. The Security Council, in
particular, has demonstrated that, united, it can act decisively as a
preaerver of international peace and security.
In Asia, at long last the end of the Cambodian tragedy appears to be at
hand. The parties to that long-festering conflict vhich has wasted millions
(t4Aa.a.. Cb,deorA. Bofanann)
of innocent.. llves have f Inally sgreed on an elactorsl syrtam to be uneU to
conduct. multiparty Uemocratlc elec-1 ionr. Hare again the Lnat.rumentality of
t.he lJn!teU Nat.ions (ra hn ~mpart..ial arbiter in the reeolutian of irrLracCnb1e
problems has provad it.6 unUoubteU elf icacy.
Unfort.unst~ely, Afghani8t:afl iR at.111 bleeUJnq, a CcmtlRuOd victim, not of
t.he IJnited Nst.ionrd fallura to devise 8 successful solution to t.he civil war
there but, rather, a victim of the refusal by the partles t.o t.he civil .*er to
implement t-he let.ter onU spirit. of the 1JniteU Nations Geneva Agreements. 1 t.
is hopeA that the recent decision by the United State8 and the Soviet Union to
terminate the supply of arms to the be1;Jgerent.a will starve both partiea of
the incentive to prolong the needlens blood-letting.
But the United States and the Soviet IJnfon are not the only auppllers of
arma to the be1 ligerents. Consequently , the United Nations muat make it clear
thataubaidiary auppliern of arms to fuel and sustain the Afghan tragedy are
alao duty bound to reapecc, Un i ted Nations-broker4 peace agreements.
In the Middle East, the yuns of war are silent at least on the
Iraq -Kuvait front. Thank God, Kuwait’8 freedom and independence have been
restored. A dangerous precedent. has not. been allowed t-o acar the face of
humanity - that a small, defenceless independent and sovereign State be
obliterated from the face of the earth with impunity by n powerful neighbour.
We can argue int~errninably about the excesses or depredations of Desert Stow-m,
but the reality is that the restoration of Kuwait’s exist.en?e as a free and
independent, nati;>n has rC?nSSUred small, powerless and defenceless Stat.es, like
my own, of their innliennblc right to exist as free and independent nations -
provided, of ‘ii1 Sf’, that f roln now 011 there vi 11 be no selective moral it.y in
the t I e<rt rrlc~rit of ,~~J’J’c*55,i(~ll t,y t ti42 IP”W”’ f :I 1 ilr;ai rist the W?Jk.
The Cyprus guestioe remains as stubborn as ever. !Lhere is what is called
new thinking in the world today and the world is changing so fast that the
rap-makers have thrown up their amis in despair and frustration. Aod yet 5ome
things are refusing to change. One of thers is the tragic division of the
idyllic island of Cyprus, a non-aligued and Cormsonuealth country that
threatens no one. A lot of time and energy has been expended in the search
for a solution to the Cyprus problem by the Secretary-General over the years
without much luck. The parties are still set in their old positions,
oblivious of the buffeting winds of change around them. Cyprus must be
reunited, to take its rightful place in the new world order.
The Middle East also remains frozen in the unremitting immobility of the
seemingly irreconcilable positions of its conflicting nations. Lebanon has
taken decisive stepstowards internal peace and national reconciliation uhile
the people of Palestine remain homeless. Israel is continuing to expand
Jewish settlements in the occupied territories while professing a commitment
to negotiations to reconcile the national aspirations of the Jewish people and
their Arab neighbours. Creating facts on the ground in the West Bank and Gasa
runs the risk of ensuring the failure of negotiations even before they start.
Botsvana fully supports the United States initiative aimed at convening a
Middle East peace conference, where, we hope, the nations of the area and the
Palestinian people will come together at a conference table to find common
ground for the harmonisation of their conflicting nationalisms. The United
States initiative represents an opportunity which can only be missed or wasted
at great peril to peace. Israel has the opportunity of a lifetime to satisfy
itself that all the Palestinians want is a home of their own in the West Bank
and QlBsa. and not. t.ho abl It.ornt.\on of t.h8 Jewirh Btat,a f ram t.ho Inca of ?hm
Hlddlm lart. Tha Pnlentlnienr, mqunlly, nra prerentrd w1t.h I rbra oppor,tunity
to clar Lfy whfithel 111rnel wnntn pesca, or confl rnnt.ion of 1t.a t,arr lt.orlal
conquaatr .
In aoutharn Africa, the rrltuatlon qlvme qrounde for hopa. The Jest
veat..lya of whit. minority rula 1r1 about to he axpunqad. South Afrlcs la In
the throaa of dramatic change despite the roemlnqly InaoJubJo urban vlolanca
thot haa crasted tho perception t-ha\. black 5out.h AFricana cannot. real lna thst.
tha momrnt. of reckvninq has err Ivrd -. violence l vidatntly orchortratrd by
slnistor elements that @co bent on frustrstinq the birth of n naw nation in
thst atrife-.torn country.
Q4iss Chieoe. Botswana)
The people of South Africa stand poised at the gate of the new South
Africa tbey have sought all these years. The apartheid scaffolding has been
removed and dismantled even though the structure - tbe structure of
apartheid - remains intact. The legislative basis of apartheid has been
removed for the first time in more tbau 300 years , and South Africa for all
South Africans regardless of colour, race or creed is ready to be negotiated.
There is no time to waste. Tbe conditions of the United Nations
consensus Declaration on Apartheid and its Destructive Consequences in
Southern Africa may not have been met in letter and spirit, but the time has
come for the people of South Africa to proceed to tbe Conference table to
negotiate a new democratic dispensation for their country. The Abuja
statement on South Africa issued by the Organiration of African Unity (OAU)
Ad Hoc Committee in July 1991 is unequivocal about the urgent need for
negotiations to begin:
"The Committee underscores the fact that central to tbe struggle for
the eradication of apartheid is the transfer of power to a democratic
government elected on the basis of a non-racial and democratic
constitution. It reasserts that negotiations leading to the drawing up
and adoption of this constitution is now the most urgent and pressing
question. To this end, it calls upon the national liberation movements
and all the anti-apartheid forces to work in concert within the framework
of a patriotic front." (A/46/450. annex, oara. 4)
The situation in South Africa today is almost a replica of the situation
in Namibia during the implementation of Security Council resolution 435 (1976)
in that territory. If ne are expecting the establishment of perfect peace in
Sopth Africa as a prelude to the commencement of the negotiations for a new
South Africa WC? ere expecting the impossible. The closer we are to the
resllratlon of the new South Africa the more desperate and vicious will be the
remiatsnce. The negotiationn themrelves are most likely to be accompanied by
the eecalation of violence, inspired or free-wheeling, in the townships and
elsewhere In Sout.h Africa.
Of utmost jmport.ance at thlo crucial juncture is the adoption of a
democratic constitution to end once and for all minority rule in South
Africa. Political Prisoners have heen released and are being relsaaed and
will all be released simply because there is no sense what.soever in keepirq
them incarcerat.ed. General amnesty. however imperfect, if5 now in place under
the trusted auspices of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner ior
Refugees C which guarantees the safe repatriation of exiles. The repressive
laws that have formed the foundation of ,.,artheid and have been the object of
the United Nations anti-apartheid campaign for close to half a century have
been abolished. There is today an atmosphere of relatively free political
activity in South Africa, free enough at least to allow the convening of an
all-party concerence to negotiate 8 new constitution.
Nevertheless, the United Nations must continue to insist on the cessation
of violence in the townships and elsewhere in the country so that an
atmosphere auspicious for negotiation could be created in South Africa. While
the onus for the maintenance of law and order rests with the South African
Government., black leaders are also duty bound to contribute to the search for
a national solution to the destrurtive violence. It does nobody any good
aimply to stand. watch and criticire and allow the dark and sinist.er forces of
hired thuys rind assassins to cheat the people of South Africa of their right
t-0 be free from tire scv;lr~je 9f r;lc.inl t-yranny.
we ate pleared that thr United lationr Weetern Sahara oparatlon WM net.
in motion on 6 Septamber 1990. It Is hoped thst the two psrt Ies to that
conflict will coopersto with the Sp~cisl Rspressntative of the United Nnkionn
Secretary-Gensrml to ensure that n successful referendum to settle the
queetioa of Western Snhars once and for all ia held on schedule.
In Central America, i.t is hoped that the lenders of 151 Salvador will
cooperate with the Secretary-General in his efforts to facilitate negotlntiona
to and the ruinous civil war that has throatsned to blee?d the country to
death. We urge the Security Council to continue to take a keen interest. in
the issue.
Over the years the world has seen the emerqence and growth of what soms
call a “borderlesa economy”r and yet the world economy has continued to be
controlled by the macroeconomic policies of a handful of countries. wo carln0t
talk about democracy, good qovernance and transparency at the national leval
and deny the application of these principles to the management of the
international economic system. It ia appropriate ond indeed desirable that
pluralism find a niche in the macroeconomic management of the global economy.
The major players in the “borderless economy” should appreciate that. this is
in their self-interest too. The persistence of the world’s economic ills is a
sore reminder that some of the prescriptions which are preferred by the major
actora have fallen short of addreasing the root cause of the problems. The
involvement of other States will. provide alternative approaches to dealinq
with these problems.
Botswana welcomes the proposai made by the Secret.ary--General on
3 July 1991 in hjs opening statement at. the s szond regular session of the
davelopment flnsnclng. We are pleased t.hat this Issue will tnt qivlan alar ioun
consideration during thin session of the General Asnembly. wow Ihst the
dtatractfnq Eeat./Uent. divide hnn hesn ellminaled the t.ime 1~ opportune to
sttend to the resl problems facing human1t.y. Gotme of t.he vast. renourcem t hnt
have bean spent t.o produce nnd maintain weapona of mbnn desl.ruct.\on should now
be channelled towards pressing development problems. It, is our sincere hope
that the current climate of conaenmua will be fully taken ndvsntsgo of in
order to reach a sst.iafactory decision.
We look forward to a succensful conclusion of Lhe Uruguay Wound of
multilateral trade negotiations. The integration of Eastern and Cent.rel
Europe into the world economy entails the need for greater access t.o marI ket:;.
Resource flows to developing countries and the prcorromioa in trana!! ion alone,
without. increased trade opportunitisa, cannot lead to sustained ,\II(:
sustainable devsl opment.. There is a new sense of urgency t.o briny
protectionism to an end.
Africa’5 crit.ical economic situation psrsiat5. In many countries the
situation has deteriorated. The continent is faced with a crippliny debt
burden. At the end of 1990 Africa’s debt. amounted to over 3270 bill ion.
Although this amount may appearsmall compared to global debt figures, the
seriousness ard enormit.y of the problem can be readily appreciated when one
takes into account the debt-.servioe ratios which are so high that most of t.ho
export revenues are used to repay debt instead of f inancirq devcJ.opment - Thr
reduct: ion c,f debt obligations should be made a major priorit.y if Africn is to
be able to face t he development chra! lnnge in t11e 1990s. Af r li:arl count r i es
fully under’st and their 1.PSFKJIlS ibi 1 i ! y in t nt.k I i nq I.hesp ~~rrtt> 1 em:;. They ilC‘Cf’IIJ
the ns+?d for piI 1 i ( y I C!I)I i + *at JO~J nirnc~ri at pt ft7c.r ivv1 y dt*i? I i ri:, Wit tl t tr13
developmental problema. It im important that the ryeclal needrr of kfrica are
not only kept on t.he lnternatlonal aqends but. t.hst qsnulna efforts are also
made to rsrolva t.hrm.
Botswana attachem th@ utmost !mpartarwr to lsauerr of environment. snd
development.. The cnnrervation of our renewable and non-renewable t-esourcos is
a major component in the formulation anal ~mp~smentation of dsvolopment
pol Iciea. Since independence Botswana has enact&d a variety of laws aimed at
addressing environmental issues. Last year we adopted a national conservation
strateqy with a view to ensuring effective coordination hetwecrn issues of
snvi ronment and development.. The areas of major concern are range-land
degradation, tho use of wood fuel without replanting trees, the mining of
groundwater, the rsductiou of wildlife species, the generation of wastes which
pollute soil. and water, and the ahnndoruwnt of open mining ahafts and quarry
pits.
It ia Botmmns’m policy that the rarponaibility for conmervat.ion and
protection of tha environment should frill upon there who own and/or msnsge t.hs
country’s fe~ourc01~. Them include c~onnunitlsa, farmorn, livortock ownera.
amsll entarprisaa and induatrialiata. In thin rnspect the Government rsguires
sound environmental impact studise for major davalopmwnt project o. Xt ir the
aim of Botruann to enaura that the prices of such reaourcen 80 land, water and
forestr reflect the @carcity valuer in order to increaas awaroneae of the nead
to connerve uuch reeource8.
Botswana is comitted to plnying its part in dealing with issues of
environment. But there are limitations an to what a poor developing country
can do on its ovn, qivan the fact that the question of development is an
important aspect of a aation’o capacity to addrens the environmental
challeugos. In view of this, the 1992 Rio de Janeiro United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development will be a hiator ic lsndmark in
multilaternl cooperation. It is our fervent. hope that the Confer”nce will
adopt concrete deciaiona aimed at addressing the link between environment and
development. Many people in developing count.riea live in ab.ject poverty, and
for the poor long--term sustainability plays an insignificant role in decisions
on product ion and consumption. What is uppermost in their minds is how to
rrurvive or live from one day to the next. Poverty breeds environmental
degradation, which in turn repradrlcos and reinforces povert.y. This first
world sununit on environment and development should address thase issues in
clear and unambiguous terms. This would involve. among other things,
assisting developing countFries to gain OCCC?.P,.S to environmentally sound
technoloyies.
Botswana r~afflrn~ Lt.4 fsit.h in thr Unitod Wfat.ion@. This unique
Orq~niu~t.ion has rwrved UCI roll deayite t.he @@vere conntraint.s that have 80
often in the psrt. f rucrtrstad it.a enderrvourn in the aervico of peats. Relsnsed
from those conxtzsint.s and infuned with a naw dynamism and a renewed ~)enxe of
purposs, the United Nations haa the capncity t:.o give form and ahaye and
mesniny to the new world order for the good of mankind an b whole.
Finally, it in our fervent hope that Africs’s bid for the post of
Secretary-Cenerml of t.he United Nntiona will be crowned with #uccea~. All we
ask is to be allowed the opportunity to nerve on the thirty-aighth floor.
&.,.$.Q~A--J’&j~J&J (Cent1 al African Republic) (intarpret.at-ion from
French) I The aocfsl upheavala that have occurred In the world, whose
conaequencea have for borne time been etserizq intarnetional relations in a now
direction, hove recently been ao forceful, rapid and profound that the entire
internat.ional c0mznunit.y is ntill exaznining their import, and particularly
their impact on the very future of international relationa.
While it is truo that that phenomenon can be broadly explained by the
explosion of the contradictions born of the disappointed hopes and accumulat.ed
frustrations of many peopLea over many yeara, It ia nevertheless true that. we
are truly confronting a changing world, a world rndical1.y different from the
one that determined the equilibrium of forces on which our Orqanization rests
today, a world whose evolution, owing to its momentum, we cannot. yet. ynuqe
with any precision.
And yet we must try to harmonic Ihe state of the world today with the
devaIopment. of new int.ernntional social fact.ors in ortler to avoid aggzavatiny
the imbalance that.. mult.ilaternlism has not. managed t-o redress.
That. III the line of t.hought. the delegstion of the Centre1 African
Republic would like to shsre with the Ansembly, to which X am firat. in duty
bound to trnnsmit, t.he beat wirhse of His Rxcelle~ncy Gsnernll Andr/ Rollnybn.
President. of the Rapublic and Hesd of Stat-e. for the muccoee of it.e work.
I am c Iao ploaaed to extend to Hr. Shihabi the weretest congratulations of
the delegation of the Centre1 Afrlcnn Republic on his election to the
presidency of this seasion. His internntionnl know-how In t.hia changing world
promises e successful outcome for these deliberations, end he can be assured
of our complete coopernt ion.
The competence and spirit of compromise with uhlch hla predecessor,
Mr. Guldo de Mnrco, conducted the work of the last session deserves the
appreciation of the delegation of the Centrnl African Republic.
The Government of the Central African Republic wculd also like, as his
term draws to a close, to nsaure our Secretary-General, Hia Excellency
Javier Perez de Cuellar, a of its grent gratitude for the determination with
which he helped ta restore to the Unxted Nations its credibilit.y, prestige and
arzthority, attributea so esaential today to the action it ia undertaking to
ensure that conditions in t_he world will bs in keeping with the principles of
the Chnrter.
The admission of uew Memberrs to OUT midst, the highest manifestation of
the realitation of the aspirations of their peoplsa, ia a striking stage in
the efforts made by the Secretary--General to endow the Orqanization with a
universal character.
The delegation of t.he Central African Republic is therefore happy to
Dmmocratic Peopls’~ Republic of Korea, with which my country anjoyn cordial
relationr of friendahlp, which we hope will ho otrenqthsned by cooperation
within t.he framework of the lfnltsd Nations.
The Internations nocisl re&littma of today’s world demand an even
graster affirmation of our will t.o net for t.hom a courrre that. will be in
harmony with the ideals and principlor of the Orgsnlsation. lor where exactly
do we at and7 Tho cond I t.ions thst have led to the advent. of t him nascent new
world order arm, to be sure, thm result of the dynamism of international
relst.Sona tahst hcra brought about. the normallxntion of relations between t.he
two aupsr-Powers on the basis of the redsfinltion of the doctrine of
collactive security upon which they era enqagsd.
We have good reason to be pleased thnt the outcome haa been this positive
trend, which has resulted in greater compromise on all international
guestions, beginning with thoaa relating to international peace and acrcurity.
The evolution of the situation in those regions of the world that hnve
been a source of concern to the international coxxxunity ia alao significant in
t.hi6 respect.. Whether in Cambodin, in Western Sahara, in Afghanistan, An
southern Africa or in the Korean peninsula, United Nations action, aupported
by the real political will of the partierr involved, has made it poarrible to
come up wit.h or at leaat to init.iate a solution in line wi: h this trend
toward8 compromise.
Tha dalaqstion of the Central Africsn Republic would alao like to noo
thnt aama api r i t dsf ine Ihe sattlement of questiona 1 inked t.o the r I ae of
national lam throughout the world, (II) In Eastern Europe.
flut the lndiwlslhllity of peace muat. not prevent. certain reqinna whose
peoples rightly aspire to a life in peace from benefiting from the current
t rendn.
rirat, there in the Middle taat. where everyt.hinq must be done to achieve
a just and lasting settlement fully qunrantesinq the national rights of t-he
Palestinian people and Israel’s legal right to exist. My delegation considers
that the posajble conweninq, in the near future, of a conference on peace In
ths Middle East will provide an opportunity to formulate such a settlement.
Then there is South Africa, where the Pretoria government’s desire to
enact reforms has placed the national debate in a new light.. We should
encourage the continuation of onqoinq efforts to transform South Africa into a
truly democratic society boasting equal rights and completely rid of apartheid.
Such developments. made possible by the new climate in international
relations, might have been extended also to othee spheres of coopeietion
needed for balance in a changing world. But that has not happened, as witness
the strictly limited cooperation among States in so fundamental an area as
development. It is precisely there that we can see the gap between t-he
aspirations of the majority of the u I-Id’8 peoples and the international
community’s response to those aspira’iuns.
military Irecurity, while long the goal net and pursued by Btates for political
reaaona, has now been annullnd because of the dieappearance of the very
underpinnings of the prlnciple - the rivalry between the two blocr.
Development an a way of providing all the world’8 peoplne with security
in all area6 _. security of well-being, ecological security, food mecur-ity -
should provide the ideal framework for the cooperation that ir sadly lacking
in international relations. It looks ae if t-bird-.world countries --
parti.culnrly those of Africa -- are to remain excluded from development in the
face of indifference from the developed countries,
Yet how many meetinga, conferences, seminars and colloquiuma have been
organired everywhere, often with the assistance of the United Nations or other
international institutiona, to consider and atte.npt to resolve the situation
of those countries? Though the ills have often been defined, it has never
been posnible to find a cure, and the situation in thoae countries has
deteriorated over the years. Owing to the combined effects of the steady fall
of conmnodity pricea, the very heavy s~.~bt and debt-service burden, negative net
financial flows and the growing protectionism of developed States, those
countries will never enjoy the conditions necessary for sustained, lasting
sconornic progress.
The recent assessment of the United Nations Programme of Action for
African Economic Recovery and Development. 1986-1990 confirms the limits of
international action for, African countries. At. the same time t.here ia a
growing tendency towards the reqionrll izat ion of economic activities among
developed count.ries, which can oniy cor~~.ribute t.o the maryinalizat.ion uf
Africa.
go what economic future can we predict for African countrlse wh1c.h hrrd
legltimetely hoped to be able, at. t.hIr time of a general decrease in political
tension, t.o UCJO economic interdependence to find rolutions to their problems?
Like the Covsrmnts of ot.her c?untr ies, ths Government. of the Central African
Republic has defined, in agreement with international f lnanclal institutions,
a new framework for develomnt. policies, at the cost of wall-known sacriflce~
that should heve aroused good will in the international conununity.
The round table held last April in Geneva with the asalstance of the
United Nations Development Proqrlvmns (UHDP) enabled UNDP to asunas the
difficulties my Government continues to sxperience in its efforts to atabilize
t,he economy. I take this opportunity to thank all the participants in thatround table who took an interest in the situation of the Central African
Republics we hope they will be able to moet their conxnitmenta towards my
country.
Hy Government feela that the now trend in international relation8 should
also extend to developments if it does not, the new world order for which t!le
international community so ardently wishes will he in vain.
There should be more sustained effort.3 towards a solution of the problems
of the commodity market consistent with the true vi~lue of those commodities,
especially since African economies depend heavily an this market.
Likewise, it is imperative to give hiyher priority to the search for a
comprami se on t-he question of debt and debt. *;t.rviciny in the mut.ual interest.
of creditors and debt.ors. The delqnt ion of *ho Cent.ral African Republic has
always called for nr. international c:oPferenc@ t-hat. could achieve this, And we
hope that the present cllmste In ralationa nmonp Bt.et,er will help br inq this
about.
For some time there h&s been D t.rend inspired by the developed count 1 ie~
t.owards ast.tinq (In add~t.ional condition for aid or any other f0r.m cJf
sseistsnc8 to African countrlaa: t.he sffsctivene88 of efforts at.
domocrstication and respect for human rLghts. f3uc.h an npproach cor~ld have the
major drswback of att.nchinq lower priority to the interesta of peoples et..lll
requiring (I cont.rlbution by t.he 1nt.ernntIona.l community if they are to enjoy
increased well-being.
Countries such 88 the Central AErLcan Republic, uhich have already
embarked on a confirmed courne of democratiuat.ion, would like the
int.ernotional community to consider this new content to aupport the various
efforts towards deepening and aprending democracy.
It is possible to follow international social trends in order to avoid n
discrepancy between world social reAli;y aud the law of the United Nations.
Cooperation amony States, as set out. in the Charter, has al lowed intornetionnl
relations to move in a new political direct ion; it. must. alao show States t.hu
means to reelize those international social realities t.hat reflect. the
aapirationa of the majority of the world’s peoples.
World balance demands this, and the deleget.ion of the Cont.ral African
Republic, which believes in a future accordiny with t-he purposes of the
Charter, wants to join other Members in expressing t.hm hope that this session
will mark a new staye on t-he road t.ownrds effect.ive development. cooperation
among St nt.aa.
Like those who have
preceded me to the rostrum of the Assembly, I would like in my turn to
congratulate Mr. Shihabi on his election to tbe presidency of the General
Assembly at its forty-sixth session. His brilliant election represents not
only a well-deserved recognition of his many qualities, but also the esteem
his country, Saudi Arabia, enjoys in the world for its devotion to the cause
of international peace, security and cooperation. The delegation of Benin is
convinced that, under his guidance , our work will be crowned with success.
My delegation would also like to pay a tribute to his predecessor, Mr.
Guido De Marco, who led our deliberations with great competence during the
forty-fifth session, which was characterised by a deepening in our common
thinking on restructuring and revitalising our Organiration and by our desire
to achieve consensus on the aims of the San Francisco Charter.
The Government of the Republic of Benin is grateful to the
Secretary-General, Mr. Javier Perez de Cuellar, whose tireless efforts to
achieve the United Nations objectives of peace and justice have undeniably
help to accelerate the political transformations under way in the world.
These transformations have already been reflected in the end of the cold war,
characterised by all types of rivalries at every level. Now that his second
mandate is coming to an end, we convey to him our country's appreciation for
the great devotion he has showa as head of our Organisation.
In this tribute, I also include all those, near or far, who work with the
Secretary-General. They spare no effort to ensure the smooth running of our
Organization and the triumph of the noble ideals on which it is based. It is
my pleasure to congratulate the Secretary-General most especially for his
excellent annual report. which takes account of the prestige of the United
(Mr. Hole Deain)
Nations and is forward-looking within the context of strengthening the
irreplaceable role of the United Nations on the international scene.
The universality of our Organisation has been furthered by the admission
of new Members again this year. We welcome the Baltic States - Estonia,
Latvia and Lithuania - which have regained their sovereignty after more than
40 years of annexation. Similarly, we congratulate the two Pacific States,
the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
All of these States are now Members of the United Nations. We would like to
assure them of our full cooperation in achieving our cornnon ideals.
We would also like to extend words of welcome to the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea and to the Republic of Karea upon their admission to
membership of the United Nations. We hope that, in the near future, in the
like the peaceful reunificatioas of Yemen and Germany , we will witness that of
the Korean nation, which will put an end to the long and painful night of
separation and help to resolve one of the thorny problems linked to tbo cold
war on the Asian continent.
We are also extremely pleased by the return to our midst of the Cambodian
delegation headed by His Royal Highness Prince Norodom Sihanouk.
Late in the twentieth century, history is going through changes of
exceptional depth and scope. My delegation would therefore like to welcome
the positive and encouraging events that are strengthening international peace
and security. After a terrible arms race, the United States of America and
the Soviet Union have today courageously embarked upon a veritable disarmament
marathon with a view to creating a safer and more stable world. The recent
initiative of United States President George Bush in proposing the eXir?ination
of all landand sea-based short-range tactical nuclear weapons - an
initiative that was positively received by the main nuclear Powere,
psrtlculsr ly the Soviet Union, whore Prexident Mikhail Gorbachev hns
reeponaibly taken up the challenges of peace - ia xignlffcant. in that
respect. In this same context we welcome tha strengthening of the
non-proliferation regime with ths decision to adhere to the 196R Treaty not
only of two nuclear Power9 - France and China - but slso oL non-nuclear-.wsapon
stetell. We therefore expect that this Treaty will be renewed 3r made
permanent when it expirea in 1995. Thin would open the way to iucrsaaed
international cooperation for the peaceful use of atomic energy.
The era of confrontation is being replaced - r;lowly but surely - by that
of international cooperation, and in the place of political and ideological
rivalries we see the emergence and consolidation of a spirit of solidarity and
s growing awareness of the necessary complementarities. Thus the major
protagonists of the past, the United States and the Soviet Union, have
established policies of cooperation expressed in their sustained efforts to
1 imit weapons, in particular by the implementation of the 1987 Treaty on the
Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Miaailes (XNP
Treaty) and the signing in Moscow on 31 July 1991 of the Treaty on strategic
arms reduction (START Treaty), whose aim is to spare us a nuclear
conflagration.
In a regional context, X would like to mention the positive developments
in the situation in P.1 Salvador, which are due to the efforts 0; the
Secretary-General and to the initiatives taken by the Latin American States
that met recently in Mexico City to establish the foundations of true regional
cooperation and economic inteyrst ion. These are measures that will build
(Mr, HQAQA. Brnie)
confidence and security with n vieu to the irrevarnibls ret-urn of peats to
that. r6gion.
What can one aay ahout the davelopment of dwocrat.ic movements in t-he
war 167 These have besn manifsated, iptnr..a.lln. by the political plutalinm
that has already enabled my country, Benin, to establish, after almost two
decade6 of monol.lthic government, a 1OgiOlatiVe organ, 6 Chief Erecutive
elected by direct universal. suffersge, and a truly independent judiciary to
prrrtect our freedoms.
We are proud of being 6 part of the development of democracy, which ia
spreading further over the world every day, 86 witneaaed by the failure of the
attempted cpllp-&’ against the reform policie6 of the Soviet President, Mr.
Mikhail Corbwhev. This development enhances the moral Authority of our
Organiration, rh 1 zh is rightly based on the promotion, defence and protection
of fundamental human rights, including civil and political rights for the
preservation of international peace nnd security.
(tel.. H~AQ~...JimlAIa)
Howevnr promising the new political situation prevsiling in the world
today mny aeom, ~0 cannot forget., nmid t-ha euphoria of that rssl stt ainment.s of
democracy, frsedom end tnternat.tonal cooper&t ion, t.hat l unqort.unately,
unnccspt~nble dieeyull Ihr ium. unbearable injust ice and dsngeroue hotbeda of
tension atill exist on our planet.. In other words, i ntsrnat lonal peace and
necur1t.y remain fragile.
In South Africa, ue are wltneaaing the collapse of the pillnrs of
Apart.heid - a aymtem that, in its very essence, is harmful to the human
dimension of socur ity. We can only say how plensed ue nre about this.
However, there is every reason to be concerned about the yeraiatence of
violence .- it is time to put an end to this, once and for all -- and about. tho
absence of real proqresa in the preparation of a democratic and non-.racial
constitution based on the principle of one man, one vote. We therefore nppeal
to all the peoples of the world to reaffirm their determination to harness
their efforts to assist the people of South Africa to reyain ita complete
freedom as soon as possible.
That is why the international community in gendral and Africa in
particular Tust remain viyilant and must maintain existinq measures against
South Africa, in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Declaration
adopted by the General Assembly at. its sixteenth special session, devoted to
apart.heid and its harmful consequences in southern Africa, until it has been
very clearly demonstrated that the present course is irreversible. It would
be i Illusory t.o believe that the removal of t-he sanct.ions imposed on Sout.h
Africa could lead t.o a rapid change irr t.he system of qovernrnent by the white
m i nor i t-y.
Furthermore, we ancour nge tha South Af r lean oppos I t. Ion to uni t.a for t he
purpoaa of acc*l*rrrt in9 t.hlR eVOlUtiOIl, which will maka it. posnlbls for Sou?h
Africa to contrlhuts to securing the peace and progress to which ths peoples
of southern Africa empire. Thone peoplsn hnva suffered too low7 from terror
and destructioir.
In that reBp@ct., t.he cessstfon of internal hctstliit ies in Angola,
following the signing of .t cease-fire agreement on 31 May 1991, is en
encouraging alqn of an end t-o more t.hBn 15 years of civil war, which has
ruined the country. We hopa that the name will prove to be true with regard
to Mozambique. We hope also thnt the peoples of these two countries will be
enabled t.o en:)oy t-he peace that, is so essential to national rsconstruction and
well-being.
Benin is pleased at the aqreement that haa been achieved betweorr
jndependent Namibia and South Africa on the question of Walvis Bay and the
neighbouring ialnnds, in accordance with the spirit of Security Council
resolution 432 (1978) a The settlement o this important question will make it
possible to consolidate Namibia’s sovereJlnty and territorial inteqrity and to
create the conditio::s for the economic integration of a prosperous southern
Africa.
Elsewhere in Africa, certain fraternal count.ries have not been spared
civi 1 wars born of ethnic conf 1 icts, social and political injustice and
violations of human rights. It is our duty to continue relentlessly to
rocomr~nd to those involved that they rosor t t.o t.ha vir-tuos of dialoque to
resolve their intdernnl dispute:;.
t-1
In this respect, the international community must not spare any effort in
encouraging regional initiatives , such as those of the Coafereece of Beads of
State ancl Government of the Organisation of African Unity (DAU) regarding
Ethiopia and Somalia which supported the efforts undertaken by President
Hassan Gouled Aptidon of Djibouti to bring peace back to the Horn of Africa,
or those of the Economic Coarnunity of West African States with respect to
Liberia, taken up recently in Yamoussokro at the second meeting of the
so-called Ad HOE Committee of Five under the auspices of President
Houphouet-Boigny. Benin is pleased at the efforts that have begun to be
deployed by the Senegalese and Wauritauian authorities to restore relations of
cooperation ana good-neighbourliness between the two countries. These
relations have deteriorated since August 1989.
In the north of the continent, the Governments and peoples of the Maghreb
have been aspiring to more cooperation, and the efforts they have been making
along these lines must be encouraged for the sake of the developxent of the
Arab Maghreb Union.
If there remains a significant obstacle to realioation of this desire, it
is the question of Western Sahara. vhere the praiseworthy efforts of our
Secretary-General have not yet led to peace, despite the recent cease-fire.
However, my delegation has no doubt that the parties involved will cooperate
with the Secretary-General in the context of implementation of the settlement
plan endorsed in Security Council resolution 656 (1990). which provides for a
self-determination referendum under the auspices of the United Nations and the
OAU. My country is honoured to he one of those that have participated
directly in the field in this peace mission set up under Security Council
resolution 690 11991).
(Mr. Holo. BeDiR)
Since our last session the situation in the Middle East has not
improved. The international community was heartsore at the war between Iraq
and the coalition of States that, quite rightly, cooperated with Kuwait. That
war - caused by Iraq's aggression against eh8 sovereignty of Kuwait - ended
with victory for the Coalition, but without solution of the basic problems
that inflame the region. Not only has Iraq, which invaded Kuwait - now
liberated - been destroyed; Kuwait too is in ruins. This distressing
spectacle faces mankind with serious moral problems. Must we embark on
massive destruction of the heritage of all mankind befOr we begin to
reconstruct, at great expense?
The Republic of Benin has always respected the principles of the Charter,
and we condemn any use of force to settle disputes b8tWe8D states. w8 f881
that mankind Will be running real risks if, as in the past, it drags its f88t
with regard to the question af a comprehensive and urgent resolution of the
question of the Middle East. As in the case of the war against Iraq, the
question of the conflict b8tween Israel and its neighbouring Arab States, the
question of Palestine, which has not yet been Settled; and the question of
Lebanon, where foreign troops are still present, and in respect of which one
cannot speak of true national reconciliation, still pose a threat to
international peace and security.
There is thus an urgent need for specific and concerted measures taking
into account, in particular, the rights of all the States in the region,
including Israel, as well as the legitimate political rights of the
Palestinian people, in order that a comprehensive, just and lasting peace may
be achieved. In our view, only a sincere and frank dialogue between all the
parties involved will make possible a just and final solution to the
(~r~-.~A~~~ll~Pln )
Ierrall-.Psleatla1en prablmn. Prom that rtandpolnt, my country hope@ t.hst. t.ho
coneultetlane undort:akwn by the United Itetor nuthorltlee will muccsed In
leading to the convening of e regional confsrsncr. ua w*lCOme the support
rhown by the Palestine llatlonal Council, at its recent meeting in Algiers. for
the United SteMa inltlat!ve.
In turope, the raunlficatlon of the lalsnd of Cyprus le slso en urqont
teek uhoeo completion ie In the intoreet8 of pesco and recurlty, which 81.0
threstoaod by nstlonslity conflicts such nn that in Yugoalevla.
Q&r. X010. Benin)
Benin is concerned with the tension uhich prevails in that country, whose
ideals of non-aliqment we share. Thus, ne urge mutual understanding among
all the componeats of that Pederation, so that peace and security may be
restored through negotiation.
mu Asia, follorinq the withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan, it
is essential that the various parties enbark on negotiations with a view to
brinqinq about a restoration of national unity and peace.
We congratulate Cambodia, which has been ravaged by a dozen years of
civil war, on the establishment of a cease-fire. But the various factions
must still overcome the internal controversies which impede the implementation
of Security Council resolution 668 (19901, aimed at arganizinq free and fair
elections under the auspices of the United Nations.
boor tbat the world seems to be embarked on an irreversible course to end
the policy of blocs, where the obsession with military security is no longer
appropriate, prospects seefn to be openinq up for arms limitations. The final
objective is general and complete disaraame nt which will release substantial
resources for the development of the poorest countries of our planet.
In other words, our Orqaniaation will have to take up additional
challenges arising from the continuous deterioration of the international
so&o-economic situation vhich poses another threat to international peace and
security.
Indeed, poverty, went, famine, malnutrition, sickness, drug abuse, the
deterioration of the environment kill more people in a few days than did the
Hiroshima bomb. Are these ills not the daily lot of a major portion of the
peoples of this world? And nowhere is the situation as serious as in Africa.
a8 the Secretary-General emphasized in his annual report.
Tha internat ionbl cofmmuni’ y la l ufferlng from unwzceptahla i I lo at. t-he
end of the tuent.1et.h century, rk+eplts al 1 the progress nchlsved by mankind.
Dellpile the Immrnnr ro~~outce~ of the modern world and the mttraordlnary
scientlCIc: nnd technnloqlcsl progr’saa, poop10 on our planat, still find It
difficult to oxiat or oven to ourvivo.
The economic rlt.uat.lon In the developing countrier har barely Improvad,
dssplte attempta to remedy It. There Is no doubt that. this ~II the most.
ssrious thrent to international peace and securit.y in a constantly chsnglng
world where the meant of comnunicatlon enable the poor to observe t,ha insolent
wealth of the rich.
An Pnternationsl order which allows more than half the population of thn
planet. to die of hunger and ignorance is doomed to failure.
The Declaration adopted at the the eighteenth special session of the
General Assembly of the United Nations devoted to international economic
cooperation, held in April-May of 1990. did not fsil to sound its trsdit.ionel
alarm. It wa8 recognired by All that the solution lioa in the adoption of
nat.ionnl policies to liberalixe t.rade 80 as to respond more flexibly to the
evolution of the economy.
Furthermore. the Second Unitod Nations Conference on the Least Devoloped
Countries. held in Paris in Sept.ember 1990. rz,ti:mnended to the international
community in it-s final Declaration that greater attention be focused on thaso
countries in vieu of their specific problems.
(Mr. Holo, Benin)
The profound changes under way will have failed to achieve their
essential objectives if they a0 not take into account and settle the question
which has become primordial, namely, the organisation of planetary solidarity;
in other words. if they do no tackle the fundamental problems of Worth-South
relations, and in particular those linked to African debt, the impoverishment
of our continent, and the accompanying train of want, sickness and
unemployment. In effect, the situation in Africa, where most of the least
developed countries are to be found, is hardly encouraging.
Almost all African countries have programmes for the restructuring of
their economies in accordance with the International Monetary Fund (IWF) and
the World Bank, the positive effects of which are still to be seen.
Faced with the uncertain future of all these countries, at their last
susvnit meeting the Heads of State and Government of the Organization of
African Unity (OAU), recognised the need for stopgap measures by encouraging
regional economic integration to be achieved in the next three decades, and to
take shape in the African Economic Community.
But in the short term, Africa will continue as in the past to make
appeals to its creditors to undertake to do more to help find a solution to
the painful debt problem and thereby help complete its internal efforts to
achieve development.
We commend deservedly the efforts undertaken by some States to arrange a
partial rescheduling or cancellation of certain debts in third-world countries
in general, and of those in Africa in particular, and I appeal to other States
to do the same in the interests of all. For, if nothing is clone today to
guarantee for our youth a future that is humanely acceptable, the difficult
constraints and the many privations imposed by the economic adjustments which
are being nnde all over tha cant inent., will momt definttsly Imad to racial
problems and pol lt lcal Inst.nhi 11 t y thst no coercive IIMOIIUCO will be able to
cont.nIn for lonq.
To remcue Africa from it.a despsr8t.c economic sit.uat!on, rapid net-Ion on
t-he part. of the int.ernat,lonal cormnunity is indispsnnable.
I ndeed, It. Is clear that. after t.ha failures of the yeara which followed
Independence and the impnaas into which t-ho mi 1 i tarint-socialist. Marxist
revolut.iona of the cant I nent. hnvn led, the mro of democracy runs the rink of
leading our St.nlea - if nothinq apec:ific and aubat.ant.ial la done In t.hs next
five yearn Into chws. This 13 hardly something we vould like t,o happen.
That in why the int..ernnt.ional c:ommunit.y. in particular t-he developed
countries. must. undortnke to help Africa put, into effect. the proposals of the
Ad Hoc Conuni) tee of the Whole entrusted with the examination and final
evaluation 0 the implementation of the United N<\\tiona Frogromne of Action for
African Economic Recovery and Development 19E6-1990 (UNPAAERD). which was held
here at the United Nat.ions Headquarters from 3 to 14 September 1991.
In this c:ont.ext, I appeal to all deleyations to adopt t.he two documents
submitted for t.heir attention by the Ad hoc Committ.ee of the Whole *under
item 4 of the agenda of the current. sassion of the General Assembly.
The adoption by consensus oE these two documents will make it possible to
implement proposals t-0 reverse the trend towards the decline and the
increasing impoverishment of the African States and to raise the very low
st.a:ltinrd of living of the rural populat~i’)ns, who are the principal victims of
al 1 t.hose pc,J it ical arid orr~nwnic fni lures of l.he c:ont i nent J ince independence.
The future of mankind depends, too, on a sound mamqmkent of tbe
ezwiroment and a lasting development strategy within the context of the
initiative taken by the Geaeral Assembly when it adopted rresalution M/228 on
the convening in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1 to 12 June 1992 of the United
Nations Conference on Bnviroaumnt and Developsent, the third eeseion of whose
Preparatoq Committee was held in Geneva from 12 August to 4 September 1991.
we sincerelg hope that our Heads of State and Government vi11 examine
with all due care the problems of protecting the environment and the closely
linked problems of harmonious and lasting developeat, aud that thair analyses
and decisions will be based on the valuable documents being prepared by our
experts in the various negotiating cosanittees and working groups.
Confident, therefore, that the Rio Conference in 1992 will be crowned
with success, I should like to anticipate event5 by saying that we must
collectivelg and individually co-it ourselves , especiallg the most developed
and wealthiest among us, to implementing tbe decisions taken. They will cover
financial mechanisms: the transfer of new, clean technology; and legal and
institutional machinerg. The consensus that will be achieved both by the
Preparatory Conxnittee, which will complete its work in lrlarch and April 1992,
and the Conference itself in June 1992 will not menu the triumph of the ideas
of a group of States CC of one hemisphere over another, but will be tbe result
of a common political will to achieve a comeon dream for a conanon cause
without frontiers: Planet Barth.
While awaiting the deliberations in Rio next June and the implementation
of the decisions taken there, Benin, like some other countries. is
periodically suffering natural disasters which in a few hours destroy tbe
development efforts made vitb a great deal of determination and enthusiasm.
This year again, for the fourth time in 10 geara, Benin was the victim of
floods in its southern region following dovapoura lasting from May to July.
Those floods caused loss of human life and of millions of hectares of crops as
well as displacements of people and the destruction of dvellings.
I take this opportunity to erpresa our thanka once again to all those who
responded to tbe appeal of Benin'5 Head of State* President Yioephore Soglo,
end cf the Office of the United llations Disastet Relief Caord%nator (UHDRCJ) by
providing us with various t*s of emergency aid. We express our gratitude to
them and sincerely hope that tb8 International Decade for hlatural airsaster
Reduction will make it paaeibia to carry out reconstruction projects to deal
with disasters that have already occurred as well as to take mwsures to
lessen the effects of future disasters.
In addition. aware that man remains th8 subject and the euthor of all
processes of transforming society, aad that there csa b8 no real, lasting
progress without freedom, Benin has embarked on a democratic process, and, as
I have already said, has been able to complete SUCC8SsfUlly its fkSt
&18ctioUs.
'i invite the industrialised countries and international organisations to
provide snassive aid to the emerging democracies in the countries of the South,
in a spirit of solidarity simPlar to that which they have shovn vitb regard to
the countries of Eastern Eut~pe. That is tb8 only way to enable those
democracies to acMeve quickly the nratttrial conditions necessary to
consolidate themselves and gradually to get out of tie economic morass they
find themselves in and escape its consequences.
I- Similarly, at the political level, the condemnation of gouts d etata and
sxqpart for democratic regirses, such as that in Baiti, must occur
spontaneously and imu@diately, as happened with regard to the a-. d'itat
against President Gorbachev. Therefore, my Government firmly supports all the
efforts to restore to power President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the
ccnst5tutionally elected President of Haiti. Convinced that power comes from
the ballot box, aad not from brute force, Benin warmly welcomes the strong
resolution unanimously adopted by leaders of the Organizati8n of Am8ricaa
Stster iwAS) oa 30 Ieptembor thir year In Uarhiaqtoa, and hoper that the
rtstrmenta made in tho Security Council oa 3 October and in vrriour capitals
of tho world will bo trsamlatod into concrete doodm. The Haitian poop10 chose
dmocracy in a roveroiga act. The international cannuaity, which pave its
help to that oad, must help them to rortore and coasolidato democracy.
Finally, the nascent democracies in Africa sad olsewhero canaot grow
stronger without building true Gtatos of law, whore rorpoct for human righta
rind thr furtherance and dsfoncs of human rights and the rights of poop1011 ere
not empty word6 but realities, translated into deeds in everyday life.
To that end, sry country is already taking useful steps to ensure
worthwhi3s participation In the World Conference on Human Riqhta, to be held
at. a high lavel is 1993.
Wo vary much hope that thu 3sbates at tho forty-sixth session of the
General Asnembly will allow ua to consolidate the gainr made in maintaining
internationnl peace and sacur-ity. They atrsngthsn our hope that the
wrochQP;!:an-t bet.ween the nlajor Powers will continue to bring positive effects
in world events, .so that satisfactory solutions can be found to existing
conf 1i.ct.s. We also hope that the externa.; debt burden of the developing
coun’trliar will be lebaenod and that the as.ristance given by wealthy countries
to the less fortunate countries will be increased, making it possible to
implement the social and ecorJom.ic projects vi..nl for their existence.
Asi the Assembly will have noted, the current. state of the world ttas made
it necessar; for me to emphasise certain points. In doing so, I wanted to
express atlrl sh,are the hopes of a people wh4,ch has resolutely set out on the
difficult. but very healthy path of free:‘iom, in order to overcome fear, poT.rerty
and uncer ~:Bjnt~ about the f~tura !:hrc.,ugh its own genius, but not losing sight
of the fsct that intmrnatiaarl coopmr8tlon awl rolidarity arm slso am8mntlal
to rmalirm it8 dm8tlny.
&&I- (Rwanda) (iatorprmtatloa froa trmach)! It im a
qrmat honour for mm and thm entirm Stwandmmm dolmgation to coovmy to the
Prmsident our warm conqratulationr on him l lmctlon to prorldo over the work of
thm General Aaammbly at itr forty-mirth rmrmion. His election Ir rebcoqnition
by the intmroational cmunity of him outatandinq pernoaal qualities and his
ability au a mmaroned diplomat. It is also, through him, a tribute to his
country, the Kinqdoa of Saudi Arabia, which has always strivma to strengthen
tiea of friendship and cooperation bmtween all pmace-loving and justice-loving
countries.
We also congratulate the otter officers of the General Assembly elected
to direct the work of thim smsaion.
The Rwandorm delogatioa at this mesaion of the f3mmral Assembly uiahes to
assure the Proridont that it stands fully propsrod to make its contribution to
the IIUCCO~I) of the Assembly’s work.
Our appreciation is alro addressed to his predecessor,
Mr. Guido de Marco, who guided the work of thr forty-fifth resmion with wisdom
and compotsnce c the results of which were unanimously lauded.
Permit mo also to pay a tribute to the Secretary-General,
Mr. Javier Peres do Cusllar, who has for ten years served and directed our
Organisation with competence, wisdom and dedication in discharging the
extremely burdensome and complex responsibilities conferred upon him. The
many different successes scored bear testimony to his exceptional qualities
and have redounded to the esteem and credit of our Organisation. The Rwandese
Republic will always remember him aa a man who devoted himself heart and soul
to the cause of peace, justice, solidarity and the well-being of peoplea. He
may be assured of our profound gratitude.
I should also like to add my voice to that of those who have already
offered the new Members a heartfalt welcome to the family of the United
Nations, namely, the two Koreas; the three Baltic Republics: Estonia,
Lithuania and Latvia; the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Marshall
Islands. They may be assured of our sincere Ielicitntions and our
encouragement in working for the blossoming of the noble ideals and, more
particularly, contributing to the consolidation of nuch better international
relations of solidarity.
In keeping with well-established tradition, the annual conveninq of the
General Assembly is intended to provide an opportunity to take stock of a
year’s activity by the United Nations, with a viev, especially. to prepa inq
far the future on the bsmim of lmmmonm learned, l xperlaaco galned snd reaultr
achiovod. It alro provider a mpoclal opportunity for all Mamber Stat-es to set
forth, publicly and solemnly, their poeitlone with regard to the problems
currently of concern to the international cornunity. It im an opportunity
also to voice the hopes they have for the future, hopes the rsalitation of
which will depend on the mobili8ation and contribution of all peopler in the
context of more active molldarity above and beyond pioua hopee and mere
declarations of intent.
It ix against this backdrop and notwithstandiny the rather positive turn
of evonta in international political relationa that Rwanda continues to be
gravely concerned over the international economic situation. That eituation
hardly gives any ground8 for opttmiam. mindful a8 W(I are of the worsening of
the structural crisis in the world economy that is broadening the gap between
tho industrialised and the developing countries.
Before putting forth Rwanda’s posltion on the major problems of
international politic8 in terms of political relations and economic iaauea,
the Rwandese delegation would like first of all to draw the attention of all
delegations gathered here for the forty-sixth session of the General Assembly
to the gravity of the state of war that my country, Rwanda, haa been living
through ever since 1 October 1990, when it was attacked by armed element8 from
Uganda.
Indeed, since 1 October 1990 the aaeailanta - including a number of
former Rwandeae refugees hired by and nerving in Uganda’s regular army, the
“National Resistance Army” (NRA), and calling itself the Rwandese Patriotic
Front., or FPR-INKOYANYI - invaded Rwanda before being thrown out on
(l!!L-~tiiYia.~al~l Rwanda 1
30 October 1990 snd since then it ha8 been orgnniming armed attscks againat
the Rrnndase population in areas bordering on Uganda.
The first attempt at. an sxplnnation advanced by thm aggressors to justify
the armed invasion of Rwanda wan their allegsk~on that the Rwandese Government.
had ref~ssd to agree to the return of Rwandese who had fled their country at
the end of the 1950s in connection with the struggle of the Ruandese people
against a feudal-monarchical regime and in favour of the setablishmsnt of
republican institutions in the country.
It should be recalled that this phenomenon of Rwandese refugees grew out
of the social revolution of 1959, which brought the overthrow of the feudal
regime in favour of republican democracy. The supporters of feudal monarchy
rejected the new democratic system and preferred exile with their partisans in
neighbouring countries, from where they have regularly launched armed attacks
against the newly-constituted Republic of Rwanda between the years 1963 and
1968.
However, Rwanda haa always sought a definitive solution to the problem of
ita refugees, one baaed on national legislation and international conventions
to which my country is party. It ia in this spirit that voluntary
repatriation, at the specific request of individual refugees, haa been carried
out on a continuing basis.
Moreover, it is important t.o stress that the vat that has been going on
in Rwanda since 1 October 1990 began at a time when our country was at an
advanced stage of negotiations vit.h Uganda with a view to A definitive
settlement of the problem of the Rwandese refugees living in Uganda. On the
basis of the out.come of those negotiations with IJyarrda, Rwanda had envisaged
waya end menee of l lro mottling the problan of Rwanclora rofu9oee living in
other neighbouring countriee and alsowhere in the world.
Only two month8 prior to the invasion of Rwanda, the joint Rwanda-Ugendn
Minleterisl Comnlttee - which had been eetebliahed in 1960 to work out e
definitive settlement of the problem of the Rwendoao refugees in Uganda - had
cuat held its third meeting in Kiqali, from 27 to 30 July 1990, with the
participation of the United Ration8 High Comnimeiourr for Rafugeor end the
Organi8ation of African Unity. On thnt occasion, the Rwendese and Ugenden
Governments had just reached agreement to the effect that under the auspices
of the High Comniseioner ior Refugees a survey was to be conducted among the
refugees themselves to ascertain their wishes concerning the three options
proposed to them, namely, voluntary repatriation to Rwanda, a definitive
settlement in Uganda with neturaliretion, or a third option of their choosing.
It is appropriate also to recall that it had been decided that the
Rwanda-Uganda Ministerial Committee, working in concert with the High
Comnisaio~er for Refugees, was to meet again in January 1991 to finelize and
endorse the solutions arrived at on the baaie of the outcome of the survey,
and that ib the meantime a group of refugees was to visit Rvanda to nee for
themselves the social and political situation in the country and to report
their impressions to the other refugees so that the latter could make a fully
informed decision on the matter.
Unfortunately, that visitc which was to have taken place from the end of
September to mid-October 1990, was cancelled by one side and instead IJgandn
began on 1 October 1990 to carry out an armed invasion against Rwanda.
Ever since the onset. of the armed conflict thus imposed upon it, Rwanda,
aided by friendly countries, in particular countries of our subregion,
launched a number of political and diplomatic iaitiatives aimed at restoring
peace in tba cauiltry and fn the region.
Against this background the summit meetings held at Mwanta in Tanzania
and at Gbadolite in Zaire stressed respect for the cease-fire between the
belligerents, the opening of a dialogue betwen the partfes to the conflict,
and efforts to find a definitive solution to fJm problea of the Rwandeee
refugees.
(ML ,,,. Ih~~ukid~ttfAli~ . Blranda )
Itwao prociooly for the purporm of xtudylng waya and meann of findlnq A
d*finitivo rolutlon to the problem of Rwandoxo refugoex that a roqlonal
conference wne held in Dar ox Salaxm, Tanxenia, on 19 February 1991, brinqinq
toqethor tha Hoadr of f&ate or Qovornmont of the rmglon. On that occasion the
Government of Rwanda, while very much deploring ths fact that the war that had
bnon impoxod on it xinca 1 October 1990 had brutally cut xhort tha procaxx of
finding xolutionx to roxolva definitively tha problem of it8 refuqeos, once
again oxyrerxed Ita conviction that. the voluntary repatriation of all Rwandese
refugees was a legitimste right and a factor that would promote peace and
reconciliation.
Rwanda conxequently reaffirmed its readiness to take the necessary steps
to facilitate the xmooth return of those rsfuqeea wishing to return and to
enxure their reintegration into the various Cacetn of national life, but in
thin connection asked for the indiapenaable support of the international
conununity,
In conformity with the decisions taken at that Dar, es Salaam conference,
the Orqanixation of African Unity and the Office of the United Nations High
Comniaaioner for Refugees are now in the process of working out, in
cooperation with the countries concerned, a plan of action for finding a
lasting solution to the problem of Rwandeae refugees, a plan which will be
submitted to a pledging conference to be held at the beginning of next year.
The Government of Rwanda, for its part, is in the process of taking specific
action to prepare for the return of Rwandeso refugees that opt for
repatriation. A law guaranteeinq a general amnesty for Hwandese refugees will
shortly be adopted.
u!ILmatublYti~lI.&%MaaBn)
Hworthmlrmm, the l tate of war under which Rwsnda hba bean living for a
year now har psovad that. the quest for a doflnitivo eolutlon of the problem of
Rwsndeam refugeea wan not really what concerned therm that hsd connlttsd the
aqqremrlon aqalnat Rwsnds. Inclesd, am the Head of Stota ol Rvanda rtressed at.
the twenty-rovonth l wmnlt meeting of the Oryaniaatlorr of African IJnlty, held
at Abuja lsrt Juno, the Rwanderm Patriotic Front, a8 80011 a8 It reallred that
t.ho protart ol the rofugse problem advanced to “logitlni8e” before the world
tha lnvarion of Rwanda no lonyar carried weight with African and international
public opinion, changed the direction of the discussion and called the
lnvaslon the clatenco of the ideal of democracy, endeavouring to make people
belleva that whet it was doing was prompted by its determination to establish
democracy in Rwanda.
The fact is that mince January 1969 the Rwandeae Government had been
proposing thAt there be a political renewal, and this idea took tangible shape
rubasquently, notably through the adoption on 10 June 1991 of a now
Constitution legitimising political pluralism as well aa effectively
establishing political parties, which are already operating and irreversibly
cormnitted to strengthening the democratic process.
In view of the fact that virtually all the prsterts put forward for
launching tha war cannot be just 1 fled, it is difficult to understand the
rationale that is prompting those who committed the aggression against Rwanda
to continue the hosti litien, to reject the cease-fire recommended by the
various summit meetings of Heads of State hold at the subregional level and to
refuse to lay down t-heir arms and enynqe in dialogue under the auspices of the
mediator accepted by both parties to t.he confl ict..
Rwanda, profoundly convinced that tho oading of hostilitier in the
sanential condition for the settlemaat of thia conflict, which has now laatcrd
for n year, ham novar rulad out political negotiations with the aggressors.
However , it ha8 alwnym stressed that much negotiations are possible only if
the guns are oileacad and the cease-fire agreement riqned between the
belligerents on 29 March 1991 in conpliod with.
It im theroform the obrtinato porition taken by the Rwandere Patriotic
Front in continuing hortilitieo that ham hmld up progress towards dialogue.
The Head of Stats of Rwanda made clear Uganda’s share of responsibility in
this regard when et the lsat munmit mooting of the Organixation of African
Unity, held at Abuja - after having demonstrated that those attacking Rwanda
had no bases within Rwanda itself but were operating from Uganda, where they
were being shrltored and wre receiving all the necessary logistical support -
he asked the Organisation of African Unity to enjoin Uganda to disarm the
aggreEl5orel on its territory.
A positive circumstance to be noted is that the aununit meeting of Heads
of State held in Gbado-Lite, Zaire, on 7 September 1991, once again stressed
the need to abide by an inunediate and complete cease-fire and recommended that
the parties to the conflict enter quickly into a dialogue. The first round of
that dialogue was held from 15 to 17 September 1991 in Gbado-Lite, under t-he
auspices of the mediator, the Head of Stute of Zaire, Marshal Mobutu Sese Seko.
But we have found, to our great regret. that the Rwandeae Patriotic
Front p counting on the support of the Ugandan Army in continuing the war, has
been engaging in stalling nanoeuvres to boycott that dialogue and prevent it
from moving forward. Surely it is through dialogue that positions can be
(kL.B.gu.ualylIlt~ ‘LIihmIulP)
roconcl led. The Government of Rwmdm, for itr part, lr profoundly conuaitted
to such dialogue and romaina ready to romum8 it without dolsy and without
precondl tionm . It la the atronq doriro of the Rwandame Government that thir
dialogue swiftly bring about rrrultm conduciva to ending the conflict, thus
creating a propitious cl\nate of poaco and l ocurity within Rwanda aa well as
throughout the region, and at the same time facllltatlng the return to Rwanda
of there rafupeem wishing to raturn. Rwanda if counting vary much on the
support of the international comunlty, of all the countrias Members of the
United Mations reprsasnted at this fort.y-rirth aesrion of the General
Aesembly, as we nook to make that. hope a reality.
Tha safeguarding of international peace and security and the constant
building of ties of frimndship and cooperation among nations remain the basic
objectives of our actions as mankind continues its long march towards the
realiration of its most profound aspiration - that is, the flourishing of
international concord, of freedom and of the progress of peoples everywhere.
Rwanda wishes once again to affirm its solemn commitment to the triumph
of the cause of peace and it pays a profound tribute to the United Nations for
the invaluable auccesaos it has achieved since its inception. We take this
opportunity to express our hopes for a further strengthening of the bonds of
fraternity and aol.idarity among peoples, so that we can bring to an end the
crisis persisting in the world. particularly in the southern hemisphere,
including Africa, a crisis that is both economic and political.
Notwithstanding the generally successful record and tireless efforts of
the United Nations since the forty--fifth session of the General Assembly. the
international community t.oday is sti 11 conf ront.ing certain conf 1 icta which
cast a pall over the dnternatioaal political scene. The world is still torn
apart &r bloody tensioas and deadly conflicts arising out of anachronistic
situations of intolerance, coloniratiion, oppression and racism. liaked
v-lolence bolds sway wherever the sovereignty of -peoples a& *he integrity of
States are flouted, wherever the digaity and the fuadamental rights of people
are disregarded or trampled underfoot.
AS to the major issue of fmdamental human rights and the dignity of the
human person, the Government of Rwanda welcomes the step taken since the
liberation of Mr. Nelson Mandela, President of the African National Congress
of S~utb Africa (ANC), on 11 February 1990, in the process set in motion in
South Africa with a view to eliminating the system of apartheid.
The removalr officially, of that system on 30 June 1991, after the three
juridical pillars of apartheid had been eliminated - namely, the Land Acte,
the Group Areas Act and the Population Regulation A&t, as we%1 as the
agreement reached on 1 July 1991 between the South African Government and the,
ANC concerning the freeing of Political prisoners - opened a new chapter in
interracial relations in South Africa.
And yet, we deplore the fact that acts of violence and massacres still
persist, especially in the black townshipsr an&. that the South African
Government, which is responsible for maintaining law and order, has not
managed to prevent them. We also denounce the secret f?nancing of such acts
by the South African Government.
Thus, while we note with satisfaction certain positive changes in South
Africa, the Government of Pvanda believes that a great deal still remains to
be done in tbe process of dismantling apartheid. Xt lauds the efforts made by
the President of South Africa, Mr, De Klerk, and the President of the ANC.
Mr. Nelson Mandela, and encourages the South African Government to pursue
negotiations with the representatives of the other South African racial
counnunities, including the ANC, to speed the day of the actual eradication of
apartheid, once and for all, in that part of our continent.
Aa to Angola, my Government welcomes the Peace Agreement signed in Lisbon
OR 31 May 1991 between the Government of Angola and IJNXTA. This agreement
constitutes a major step toward8 restorz peace, security and stability to
Atlgola. Thr international cofenunity ia called upon to support the efforts
that are being made, at the bilateral and rnrltilateral levels, to give
tangible expression to the goals embodied in that agreement in the interests
of international peace anb security.
As to Namibia, it is our view that the ;nternational c-unity must
support the negotiations set in r?otion between Illtibia and South Africa to
reintegrate Walvis Say and the offshore islands. into Hamibie, in keeping uith
Security Council resolution 432 (19781.
The Heads of State and Sovernment of the Organisation of African Unity,
meeting at Abuja, Nigeria, from 4 to 6 June 1991, were of the opinion that the
problem of Walvis hay and of the offshore Hamibian islands was not a border
dispute but rather an issue involving decolonination, an issue which must be
resolved fairly and definitively as quickly as possible.
Rwanda also reaffirms its support far the Horambican people and is
pleased at the efforts made by the Government of Mozambique and ItENAMO to find
a peaceful settlement of the conflict, which has been rending that country
asunder for several years aov.
Iiotuithstanding the significant progress made at the forty-fifth session
of the General Assembly, the problem of Western Sahara still remains a concern
for the international comnuaity.
In fact, at the end of April 1991, the Security Council adopted an
overall plan which took effect on 17 May 1991, entrusting the thited Nations
with the responsibility for organizing and monitoring a referendum on
self-determination in Western Sahara next year to determine whether the people
want to be independent, as POLISA.310 wishes, or whether they prefer to become
(LltL-mRaanba)
int@gratod int.9 Morocca. Rwanda thotaform wlcavr the pmitivo turn of
l vontn thera and l ncouraqor the partlem caacermed fully to cooperate with the
Unitqd Rations in finding a definitive rolutioa to that conflict.
Elsswt~orcs in At rice. the Governmeat of Rwanda hoper for an en8 to the
civil war i.n Ethiopia and Sonalia and l acoursger t.he peoples and governments
of these countries to mparo no afforta to l nmure peace, jurtico and security
in t.hat pprt of Al’rica.
A8 to the civil war in tlberia, Rwanda romaine convinced that only
through dialogue can peace bo remtored in that country, toqethar vith security
in the region. Hsnce we vould very nrwh like to l ee the psrtior to the
conflict, supported by the countries in the region, continue the consultations
with a view to restoring pesce and unity to the Libarian people.
Rranda firmly believes i II the vslue of dialogue in finding a peaceful
est.tlement to disputes and in tha principle of non-resort to force, and in
consonance with international ethics and modern international law, it strongly
condemns terrorism and aggression.
In international forums Rwanda has invariably voicad its dedication and
comnitrnent to pear and political dialogue and has always striven to translate
them into action on the subregional, regional and international levels. Thus,
like other countries that espouse peace and freedom, WC heaved a sigh of
relief when the cease-fire agreement was signed in the Gulf region on
28 February 1991 after Kuwait had been liberated by the anti-Iraqi Coalition
forces created under United Nations auspices to free Kuwait from the invasion
and Iraqi occupation that had gone on since 2 August 1990.
As it did throughout the Gulf criaia, Rwanda supports the meaauces and
eff;,rts undertaken by the international community under the aegis of the
(Clr.-AtNAliA.-m)
Uaitod nation0 to rmtoro lnuV jurtico, poeco and security in that part of tho
globe.
The situation in the Middle Kamt cootiauos to bo wry slarminq and the
Israeli-Arab coaflizt - e conflict which im boiq l zacorbatod by tho
PalaetAnian problem .- continues to give riro to acute disquiet in tho
international cornunity which is, aftor all, agrood that a comprohomive, just
and lasting molution bo found to thio problem.
Thus tho General Assembly at its forty-fifth soesion once again invited
the Security Council to examine tho ateps necessary for tho onvoning of an
international peace conferonce on the Middlo tact, under the auspices of the
United Nations, with the participation of tho five pormanont mombors of tho
Security Council and all parties to the conflict, including tho Palostino
Liberation Organization (PLO), the mole, legitimate roprosentatlvo of tho
Palestinian paople.
The Rwandsn Governmont welcomes the results that have already boon
achieved, through the efforts of the Secretary of State of the United Staten
of hnsrica, Hr. James Baker, and the Secretary-General of the United Nations
as well as those of l.he countries of the region, to convince the parties
concerned, including Israel and the PLO, of the need to hold an international
peace conference on the Middle East to put an end to this conflict, which has
been with us since 1947.
The international community is thus duty-bound to support all efforts
exerted at the bilateral and international levels to facilitate the holding
an3 success of this conference, uhich is scheduled to be held in October 1991.
Uit.h rwpect to the rituation in Caabodia, wa l xpr*8e our l rtirf8ction
at, and our total l upport for the cearo-fire egromnt rignod on 25 Juno 1901
botwea the Cambodian Oavorruneat and the anti-qovornmont Cambodian coslltion,
as wll em the rorulta of the l loction of 18 July 1991, which brought
Prince Morodom Sihaaouk to the premidoney of the Suprw National Council, the
provisional body which ir to hold power in Phnom Penh startinq thir conlag
Novnmber until tho holding of gonoral eloctionm to bo organiaod end l upervioed
by rho United Hationa. Rwanda mupportm the affortr of the Unltmd ttatiooa and
the other concorned psrtiar to resolve thio conflict once and for all to the
benefit of international peace and security.
Rwanda 811~0 continuer to encou~aqe all effort6 aimod et the wacrful and
independent reunification of the Korean nation and hopes thst the admission of
the two Korean States to the great family of the United Nations will
contribute to making a reality of that lngitimate aspiration of the Koresn
people.
Elsewhere in the world, we note with optimism and support Zhe nable
initiatives for dialogue and negotiations for peace and reconciliation already
under way in Latin America, notably within the framework of the Coutadora
Group. We b6lidN0 that the outcome of the Mexico Sunmit is a significant
contribution towards consolidating peace and security in the region.
The international economy ia still in crisis - a crisis which for the
third-world countries incretaaingly poses a threat to their veiy survival and
runs the the ri8k of negating the laborious efforts at development that have
already been undertaken. The crisis is easentially structural in nature
because it invo?ves machinery which currently governs international economic
relbtiona, with the increasingly negative impact inherent in the instability
of financial markota, tho continued doterioratioa in the tormr of trndo, tha
8tvJnatlon In carrnodlty mrkets, and ladebtadaerm.
Th. African COlltiD~Dt ir l till OZpWi~DCilk9 tr&C problem Of
Undordovolopmmnt~ l coaomlc projrctm for the majority of countrioa ia the least
dwmlopad category are ph. wpocially for thorn countries, 1Ika Rranda.
which are fsced with vorloua rtructural handicapr that are oxacerbated by the
currant l -2onomic 8ituatioo. Thor. are the mart diaadvanteged countrimr of the
world# thay are vitam88ing a worsening of the living condition8 of tholr
pooplos, unable to do anything about the rcourgor of poverty, hungor,
malnutrition and ignorance.
Rwanda, one of the wry rariourly affected victim8 of the porri8tont
international economic Crisis, deplore8 thi8 8itUatiOQ Bnd 0Dce ag&iD appeal8
to the international COmNDity t0 di8play greater rolidarity and more
effective uaderrtanding, vlth a view to overcoming the conrtraints and
development problema.
The problem of indebtedners ir of acute concern to the developing
countries, particularly the least developed among them. A8 IBO rightly
recalled by the S-it Conference of the Heads of State or Government of the
Orgsniaation of African Unity held io hbuja from 4 to 6 June 1991, the
unprecedented drop in prices for the conmnodities sold by African countries
which has led to worsening termn of trade, the adoption of increasingly
protectionist measure6 and restrictive trade practices on the market8 of the
industrialired countries aimed against exports from Africa - those nre some of
the chief external cause8 that have led to our continent’s indebtedness.
Rwanda regrets that the need to convene an international conference on
Africa’s erternal debt doea not yet enjoy consenaua between the induatrialized
countries and the dovelopiq countries, notably within the United Nations,
o.isA-~L-.&~dR 1
whom, non. thr lera, a brosd con~oasu~ ir emerging on the donirability of
dovrlopiag intornationsl economic cooporation on tha external debt. While we
welcome the daci8ion adopted at the Runnit Conforoaco of the l even major
indurtrisllwd countriw hold in London on 18 July 1991 to cancal between
50 par coat and 80 per cant of the offlclal debt incurrad by the leeat
dovoloped countrler, we nom the leQ# contlaue to fool that a conforonco on
Africa.8 l xtornal debt should ba convened! ruch a conferwcm could provide an
appropriate framework in tha march for an utgant solution to thir l mrioum
problem that ir mortgaging Africa’r acooomic davolopment.
ID thir connection, wo hail Japan’s initiative to hoot the International
Conference on Africa’8 Development, echodolled for 1993, with the psrticipstion
of the African Heads of State. The Republic of Rwanda pay8 a ringing tribute
to the people and the Government of Japan for this historic initistive of
great benefit to the African continent.
Uith respect to the international trade situation, Rwanda continues to
believe that, in order for the international trade system to be acceptable, it
must provide for the elimination of all kinds of trade barriers and for the
integration in the system of small countries that are now marqinalired.
including African countries. Alao, in order for the system to be viable, it
must be profitable to all trade partners.
Therefore, it is important for all participants in the Uruguay Round
negotiations to pay special attention to the problems end concerna of the
African countripr. He stress that all the partiea to the negotiations ahould
take part on an equal footing Qo that the negotiations’ outcome will be fair
and Qcceptable to all.
Bvaada vellcms the establishment by the S-t Conference of tbe Heads
of State or Government of then Organiration of JLfrican Unity, held in Abuja
from 4 to 6 June 2991, of the African Hconomic C osammity, onet of whose goals
is to promote Africa'8 economic, social and cultural developsent aad the
integration of its economies , with a view to enhancing economic
self-sufficiency and promoting endogenous and self-sustaining development.
We call upon the international cousnrn itp, and especially the most
industrializred countries and the international financial institutions, to
support this initiative Bn every way and to help the nascent African Economic
Community attain in noble goals.
We call for just and appropriate maasures to support the effort at
revitalisation undertaken bp our countries at considerable sacrifice, anb for
better integrated and more adaptable solutions to be developed with the full
cooperation of all parties, in order to ensure that. mankind will enjoy a
future of fairness, balance and harmony.
It is in this context that Rwanda wishes once again from this rostrum to
express its sincere thanks to all countriea and international organizations
which, on a bilateral basis or at the multilateral level, are providing the
additional support it needs for its development and, in particular, for its
structural adjustmsnt programme, which has been in the process of
implementation since liovember last year.
Ecological QrObh&?t are now of world concern. But there are still
differences of view with respect to the causes and responsibilities linked to
the deterioration aud the protection of the environment, as well as with
respect to the measures to he taken in this field. Once again Africa finds
itaelf the victim: there is drought, desertification, fleads and devastation
(0
the rerult ot inmat iafwtrtionr. uy country, ulf8ndr. aroribar pwAcul~r
impottancr to promwing it8 natural patrlmouy mad hrs n8do tho protection of
the l nvirommeot oam of the major prioritlw of It8 food self-•ufflcioncy
policy,
(kiLLmaumuu....- 1
Rwanda ia pled that the intornatioael cormsunity ir tackling the problon
of the l nviromnt sad ia aware of the urgent need to mobIlime all re80urco8
necessary to provide 8olutionm that will gunrantoo the 8urvival of our
planet. There are ground8 for hope that the United Mations Confereuce on
Bnvirozunont and Development 8chedul.d for branil in June 1992, the propnratory
work for which ir continuing, will ranch concortod and appropriate 8olutionr
to prororv8 e sound end viable environment for mankind. Uwanda ir
participating In thi8 work and is making its modort contribution to l n8Uring
it8 8UCCOIs.
Th8 forty-sixth 8888ion of the United Nation8 Gmnersl A88embly ir being
h8ld in a climate of particularly favourable int8rnational rolationr. Pwanda
welcomes th8 fact that the cold war, which after the Second World War divided
the world into two antagonistic bloc8 and maintained the diVi8iOn of Suropo,
ha8 once and for all ended thank8 to the policy of PerestrPika and of w
of Soviet President Mikhsil Gorbachev. This led to the Change8 in Eastern
Europe, especially the peaceful reunification of Germany on 3 October 1990.
We welcome the general relaxation of tensions in the world-wide political
cl imate, which has made possible, indeed facilitated, D solution to many
different local and regional conflicts across Africa, Asia and Latin America.
The winda of freedom and democracy which blew across Eastern Europe, and the
effecta of which were quickly felt in a variety of other places around the
world, especially in Africa, are a major factor in the political changes now
under way.
Rwanda takes note of and appreciates the support which Western countries
ale giving to this democratic upsurge. It is of the view, however, that,
while supporting the democratic processes thus set in train, the Western
count.rloo should do sll thay can to (1.0 to it that. tho l conomlc dovaloprnant of
thm countriar concornsd hacomes tho strongoat pillar of thnt democracy
becmuaa, and this must be emphanirod, It ir an illusion to rook to build e
mound democracy without promoting the roclo-economic devolopmant of pooploa.
Uy country which, In Juno 1991, began to l rtablIrh l political ryator
bared upon a multiparty approach, rolaoo thir opportunity to roafflrm ltr
unbroken faith in and coumnlt.maM to roapoct for human dignity and other valuer
univorsslly recognised as human rights. Wo alro rosffirm our faith in a
futura marked by a better world, a world of peace and solidarity, a world from
which war and all manner of violence, terrorism and dircrlmination arm
banished for over, a world freed once and for all of the vestiges of
colonialism, racism and injustice, a world marked by undaratanding, dialogua
and cooporation.
Wa utrongly urge the Unit.ed States and the Sovirt Union to presorvm the
gaina of dialogue joined in the realm of disarmament, to the great relief of
mankind, and we welcome the signing of the strategic arms reduction Treaty
which took place on 31 July 1991 between the United States and the Soviet
Union on the occasion of the Moscow sumnit. We also welcome the conclusion of
the treaty on conventional disarmament between the East and West signed on
19 November A?90 in Paris by the Heads of State and Government of the
35 countries on the occasion of the sununit meeting from X9 to 21 November of
the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. On the same occasion
they signed a joint declaration solemnly putting an end to the cold war and
affirming that they were no longer adversaries but rather had decided to
establish new relations of friendship and partnership.
(kL.JPluurbSYMWA~..Bw~nd~ 1
We hell l spwially the docl#lon taken by the Uoitod Btatos and the Soviet
Union la fnvour of 8 unllatoral reduction In thoLr nuclear arrennlr. We
welcome In r~vmaco the ldem that the other major aucloar Poworm ~111 certainly
COI low rult.
Rwanda doeply bollevee in the Unltod Netfoam and rocognirem its
Indispensable role in naintnlninq peace, security and juotlco in the struggle
to bring well-belnq to pooplom the world over.
We exprern our l inceta qtstitude to the agenclos throughout the United
Nstionn system which are contributing to the social and economic developmant
of mankind.
We rupport the establishment of a DOW and ruoro fruitful North/South
cooperation with a view to promotinq more equitable l coaomic and political
tier between Statea. Such cooperation will l otvo the goners1 interortm of
international peace and security and ie likely to promote the economic
recovery of all countrisu but especially the developing countries and among
them the least developed.
In this spirit Rwanda will actively psrticigste in the work of this
forty-sixth session of the United Nations Gaoeral Assembly and will constantly
strive to make its contribution to the fulfilment of the noble objectives of
the Charter. These include the attainment of a new international economic
order for peoples the world over, within the cootext of equality,
complementarity, understanding and solidarity, and a greater measure of peace,
justice and well-boinq for people everywhere oo Earth.
YalLtEmm ’ Two repreaeotatlvea have arkod to nuorclse the right
of reply.
~sy 1 remind memborr that, In accordance with Oanoral Arrembly
docielon 341401, ntatemamtr in l rorclro of the right of reply nro lIntted to
10 minutes for the flrst idtorvention and to 5 minutes for the second and
should bo mndo by delogatlom fron their moat *.
I shall uow crll on tbooe roprorentatlver who wlah to rpoak ln oxercIse
of the right of reply.
&ww (Greoco)~ The Grook dolsqstion was surprised by what
was said by the reprmsentatiw of Albania on 30 September when he spoke in
ersrcirlng his right of reply to the spoach of the Greek Foreign Minister. We
were surprirsd both by uhat he raid concerning the number of the Grwk
minority living in Albania and by his ellegation shout the presence of the
so-called “Tsrunis” in Greece.
First, let me say a few words shout the Graok minority in Albania. The
number of 60,000 people quoted by the Albanian reprerenativs is baaed on an
Albanian census canductsd in 1989 and is simply not acceptable. In the
conditions prevailing in Albania at that time the citizens of that country
could not declare their et.hnic identity.
Greece has never sccepted t.he results of that so-called “census”. In
fact, in o statement mad9 in the Third Cofmnittee of the General Aaeembly on
23 October 1.989 (A/C.3/44/SR. 151, the Greek delegation disputed the results of
that census with regard to the Greek minority in Albania. It did SL because
the previous tota1itaria.i regime arbitrarily recognired as members of tho
Greek minority only thoae rssidinq in a specific corner of Albania. All other
ethnic Greeks, even those who we:e born in that corner hut later vere moved
~~s~~~r~, v~re mid still ate considered es non-Greeks. The fact is that
rs of t.be Greek minority - who amount, as tha Greek Foreign Minister
Rwanda this Assmnbnblg a few days ago, to several bun&reds of thousands - are
to be found all over Albania, although of course the bulk of the Greek
population remains in their ancestral hoam.
turt1r.rlnorr , the l ducatlonml rlyhta of thr Orook nlnority l rm rubjact 10
the came gooqrephicel rertrlctloar. Kven in thorn Ilmltod roglonr vhoro Oreek
ie taught, It ir taught In the flrrt four grader of *lementnry ochool only,
while Grook~ remidlnq la other reglana of Albenin have no right to l ducntion
in their mot.her tonque.
Now, with regard to the no-called “Tremir” alnority to which the Albanisn
repreaeatative referred, I wirh to rtete once more that. Car UII no ouch
nlnorlty l xlnte. What the Albanian Government includes In that. I)O called
minority are all those individual8 who, during thm Second World War end the
foroiya occupsticn of my country, committad crimes agninat. t.he Greek neoplm in
collaboration with the Raai and rsnclmt occupat.iun forcea and, at the end of
the war, withdrew voluntarily from Greece along with the occupation forcer.
11 is unacceptable, under any pretext, to try to reverse ths rerulta of the
Secoud World War, a war that cost Europe in general, and my country in
particular, very dearly in terma of human lives snd suffering.
We believe that Albania needs our support in its first steps towards
democrar y. Thn Greek Governnent has shown film the very beginning its
willingness to be a friendly and supportive neighbour. Let it be known,
however , that the attitude and bohaviour of the Albanian authorities towards
the Greek minority will be a determininq factor in our relationa.
-4 ( IJganda 1: Wet have 1 iatened to the
statement made by the representative of Rwanda. At the appropriate tims my
head of delegation will respond to a31 the 4anuea the delegation of Rwanda has
raised against. my country.
However, 1 ohould liie to state briefly that before this body Hwanda must.
accept responsibility For its nationals. The representative of Rwanda has
&~~~itt& l&ore the Assembly that RwaQ&a*s refugee problem start%& way back in
3559. Since then, the Bwandese refugees who fled their couotry have been
living es refugees in Uganda. Uganda is not a vest refugee camp for Rwanda to
&mp 5ts -wanted nationals. They carrot live in UgaQ&a for ever against
their wi'l * .
I wi$b to deny categorically that uganazi has been involved in Amy way in
an iQvasioQ of RwaQda. N%ither does it sup~rt the refugee& who are now
inside Rwanda and fighting only inside Rwanda - arad Qot OQ th% soil of
Uganda - for tb%ir ovn right to return. The Goveraraent of Rwanda mist accept
the responsibility for its Qationals ma must cooperate vitb the present
reqionel efforts to Solve its 0~33 civil war.
I&. NGM3JKIYINlWALI (Rwanda) (intarp;-etation from French): I have
just 15sten%& to the statem%Qt by the representative of Uganda, supposedly in
reply to the statemnt I made before this boay to-y.
The problem does Qot arise iQ terms of r%spOQsibility for nationals.
Rwanda doss feel respoasible for its nationals. But we caQQot accept that a
neigbbcurinry tountryp, a friendly coamtry - aad, iQd%%d. we have always
regarded Uganda as a friendly country. and ys continue to look upon it as a
frsternal cmmtry, despite (3% critical situation that prevails - should allow
aggressors to leave from ita territory to invade our country.
I should have liked the representative of Uganda to deny that Major.
General Fred Bwigema had been the Ugandaa Minister of Defence and deputy chief
of staff of the Uqaadan Army. I would have liked to hear the representative
of uganaa deny that Major Becyenyeai, Major Peter BaybingaQa and smy others
were officers in the Uga~daQ army.
(pat. Naarukivintwali. Rwandg)
I do not wish to go into the situation in great depth, because I have
heard that another statement will be made in reply to my statement to the
Assembly. I should simply like to say that we are asking Uganda. which has
signed international conventions, to respect then. They have signed the
Declaration on the policy of good-neighbourliness. We are here ia the General
AE;sembly of the United Nations. Ugaada is a Member of the Organisation and a
signatory to the Cbarter. It is a signatory to the Charter of the
Organisation of African Unity. We ask that those commitments freely
uadertabsn be respected and that Uganda practice a policy of sincere
good-aeigbbourliness with regard to &v-da. Rwanda, for its part, remains
prepared to respond positively. But Uganda must be watchful and control all
the assailants who leave its territory to attack Rwanda.
I should like to state again that none of tbe troubles that disturb the
peace in Rwanda originate on Bwandan territory. All of Rwanda's attackers
come from the territory of Uganda. Maay neutral international observers have
noted this, and if there are others who wish to learn the facts, they can come
to see for themselves.
We ask Uganda to practise a sincere policy of good-aeigbbourliness and to
respect its conunitments within the framework of the United Nations Charter and
the Charter of the Organization of African Unity.
Mr. EUDI (Albania): Due to the lateness of the hour, the Albanian
delegation would like to reserve its right to reply on some other day.
The meeting rose at 6.30 p.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/46/PV.25.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/A-46-PV-25/. Accessed .