S/PV.1133 Security Council

Pursuant to the decfsion previously taken by the Security Council on this question, 1 shall invite the representatives of Madagascar, Indonesia, India, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Pakistan and Tunisia to take places at the Council table, A t the invitation of the President, Mr. L. Rakotomalala (Madagascar), Mr. L. N. Palar (Indonesia), Mr. Narendra Singh (India), Mr. C. B. Rogers-Wright (Sierra Leone), Mr, N. Barnes (Liberia), Mr. V. A. Haxndaai (Pakistan), and Mr. TaiebSlim (Tunisia) took places af the Council table.

Mr. President, wouldyou first of a11 accept my most sincere apologies for havlng been partly responsible for the late convening of this meeting of the Council. As members of the Council know, the reason is that consultations have beengoing on with the four African delegations which are here with a mandate from the African Heads of State to represent them in the question before the Council; and consultations have also been taking place with the representatives of two African members of the Council, the Ivory Coast and Morocco. 3. 1 am glad to announce that the outcome of the consultations has beenpositive, and1 am now in a position, on behalf of the delegation of Norway, to present a draft resolution for consideration by the Council. Since the text is not yet available as a document,l/ 1 should like, with the President’s permission, to read out the text to the Council and then to make a few comments regarding some of the salient features of the draft resolution. The text of the draft resolution reads as follows: “The Security Council, L/ Later distributed BS document S/5769. “Being gravely concerned with the situation in South Africa arising out of the policies of apartheid en Afrique which are contrary to the Principles and Purposes qui est of the Charter of the United Nations and inconsistent Charte with the provisions of the Universal Declaration of la Déclaration Ruman Rights, as well as South Africa’s obligations ainsi qu’avec under the Charter, 2 l’Afrique Comité sp&ial theid africaine par résolution 4 dkkembre “Taking note with appreciation of the reports of the Soecial Committee on the Policies of anartheid of the Government of the Republic of SouthÂfrica and the report of the Group of Experts appointed by the Secretary-General pursuant to the Seourity Council resolution of 4 December 1963 [S/5471], “Recalling the resolutions of the Security Council of 7 August 1963 [S/5386], 4December 1963 [S/5471] and 9 June 1964 [S/5761], de sécurité 1963 [S/5471] nC!onvinced that the situation in South Afrioa is eontinuing seriously to disturb international peace and seourity. continue de troubler internationales, “Deploring the refusa1 of the Government of the Renublic of South Africa to comnlv with aertinent Seourity Council resolutions, - ” - blique sud-africaine pertinentes nTaking into account the reoommendations and conclusions of the Group of Experts, sions du Groupe “1. Condemns the apartheidpolicies of the Government of the Republic of South Africa and the legislation support@ these policies, such as the General Law Amendment Act, and inparticular its ninety-day detention clause; nement de la République qui appuient Law autorisant “2. Urgently reiterates its appeal to the Government of the Republic of South Africa to liberate aIl persons imprisoned, interned or subjected to other restrictions for having opposed the policies of apartheid; ment remette nees, internees pour slétr.e “3. Notes the recommendations and the conclusions in the report of the Group of Experts; sions contenues “4. Urgently appeals to the Government of theRepublic of South Africa: de la RBPublique “(4) TO renounce the execution of any persons sentenced to death for their opposition to the policy of apartheid; condamnée d’apartheid; “(d) TO grant immediate amnesty to a11 persons detained or on trial, as well as clemency to a11 persons sentenced for their opposition to the Government’s racial policies; les personnes et la grâce leur nement; “(0) TO abolish the practice of imprisonment without charges, without access to counsel or without the right of prompt trial; “c) sans mise ter un dkfenseur ment; “5. Endorses and subscribes in particular to the main conclusion of the Group of Experts that ‘a11 the people of South Africa should be brought into consultation and should thus be enabled to decide the future of their country at the national level’; “5. conclusion laquelle le peuple decider “6. Requests the Secretary-General to consider what assistance the United Nations may offer to “6. quelle assistance “8. Deoides to establish an expert committee, composed of representatives of each present member of the Security Council, to undertake a technical and practical study, and report to the Security Council as to the feasibility, effectiveness, and implications of measures which could, as appropriate, be taken by the Security Council under the United Nations Charter: “9. Requests the Secretary-General to provide to the expert committee the Secretariat’s material on the subjects to be studied by the committee, and to co-operate with the committee as requested by it; ‘110. Authorizes the expert committee to request a11 United Nations Members to co-operate with it and to submit their views on such measures to the Committee no later than 30 November 1964, and the committee to complete its report not later than three months thereafter; ” 11. Invites the Secretary-Generalin consultation with appropriate United Nations specialized agencies to establish an educational and training programme for the purpose of arranging for education and training abroad for South Afxicans; “12. Reaffirms its cal1 upon a11 States to cesse forthwith the sale and shiument to South Africa of arms, amxnunition of a11 types, military vehicles, and equipment and materialsfor the manufacture and maintenance of arms and ammunition in South Africa; “13. Reauests a11 Member States to take suoh steps as they deem appropriate to persuade the Government of the Republic of South Africa to comply with this reso1ution.n That is the total text. 4. May I first draw attention to the fifth preambular paragraph; which reads: “Convinced that the situation in South Africa is continuing seriously to disturb international peaoe and security, V 1 would like to consider that paragraph in relation to operative paragraph 12, which reads: “Reaffirms its cal1 upon a11 States to cesse forthwith the sale and shipment to South Africa of arms, ammunition of a11 types, military vehicles, and equipment and materials for the manufacture and maintenance of arms and ammunition in South Africa”. The preambular paragraph and this operative paragraph are a reaffirmation and a restatement of the views of the Council as expressed in two previous resolutions whfch are also recalled in one of the preambular paragraphs. 1 think it should not be without 5. 1 should now like to draw the attention of the Council ta the operative paragraphs in three groups. There are three operative paragraphs which deal with the main conclusion of the Group of Experts, that is to say that it is for the total population of South Africa, on a national level, to decide for themselves the future of their country. The Council is requested to endorse and subscribe to that main doctrine and dogma of the Group of Experts. 1 feel certain that this is a dogma and a doctrine which command the unanimous support of the members of the Council. 5. J’appellerai du Conseil &Partirai tent de la conclusion suivant laquelle il appartient a tout le peuple de l’Afrique l’échelon crire le Groupe d’experts. bres 6, The two other paragraphs linked with that same problem cal1 upon the Government of South Africa to accept this dogma and to co-operate with the Secretary- General SO that it might receive whatever assistance the United Nations cari render in the implementation of that dogma. The Government of South Africa is called upon to give its agreement to this dogma within a reasonable time-limit. 6. point invitent le Gouvernement sud-africain ce dogme et Zi coopbrer afin de recevoir pourrait Le Gouvernement son accord dans un délai raisonnable, 7. The next three paragraphs which also belong together deal with measures which the Security Council cari take under the Vnited Nations Charter, 1 do not think that 1 have to give the members of the Council any definition of the word Wmeasuresn, That definition is given in the Charter itself. It is on th,at basis that the technical and practical study of these measures should be undertaken by the Committee of Experts. May T draw attention to two words. They are the words “technical” and “practical” in relation to the study. The study should concesn itself with the details-the nuts and bolts, SO to say-with regard to what such measures would entail, how likely they are to be effective, their feasibility and their implications. It is not a matter of studying the legal context of these measures in the Charter. That is, as we see it-and 1 do not think any member of the Council will dispute that-a matter for the Seourity Council itself. Nor is it a task for the Committee of Experts to study the political wisdom, advisability or otherwise, or the political aspects of such measures. That again, we believe, is entirely a matter for the Security Council itself. The decisions are to be taken by the Security Council on the basis of a comprehensive and full report on the measures, SO that the Council may know what it is deciding and what it is requested to decide. 7. un lien entre eux, traitent de sécurité des aux “mesures”. elle-même, d’experts tique de ces mesures. attention 2 savoir vrait porter sur les détails - tous les aspects concrets pour ainsi dire - dont il faudrait tenir compte lorsque l’on efficacité d’exécution. juridique la Charte, membre du Conseil le conteste, cet aspect de la question rel&ve de la compétence lui-même, pour portunité de ces Conséil de sécurité exclusivement discuter. Conseil et détaillé savoir demande de d&ider. 8. Vient d’inclure B coopérer él&ments d%formation de lui faciliter 8. There is the obvious request to the Secretary- General to co-operate with the Committee and toprovide the material available in the Secretariat on these measures for the Committee’s benefit in its study. 9. au délai pour mener 3 bien une étude aussi complète et aussi importante. 9. Then there is a stipulation concerning the time which reasonably should be used and would be needed for the completion of such a comprehensive and a11 importad study. 10. de trois d’experts, les compose des membres 10. My last comment on this group of three paragraphs concerns the suggestion that this Committee of Experts, which it is foreseen will continue to work int0 the first two months of next year, should be compOsed of the present members of the Security Council, 11. Lastly, 1 would like to cal1 attention to operative paragraph 11, which invites the Secretary-General to start working with the specialized agencies to establi sh an educational and training programme for South Africans who leave their country and cari study and receive an adequate and modern education abroad. That is a paragraph, if I may say SO, to which my Government attaches particular and great importance. It has been a matter of concern to my Governmentfor a long time that through the difference in educatlon, the artificial racial barriers in South Africa are being further widened and the cleavage is being made more marked. 12. 1 permit myself, on behalf of my delegation, to recommend this draft resolutionfor the positive attention Of a11 members of the Security Council, and 1 hope that it Will also, from the point of view of public opinion -which is important-command wide support. 13. 1 should like to concludebysaying that1 am afraid that this draft resolution does not contain what many would have liked to see. On the other hand, P believe that it does not contain elements which are clearly unacceptable to members of the Security Council. In other words, we hope and believe that it has the strength as well as the weaknesses of a negotiated compromise draft resolution.

Mr. President, 1 want to express the appreciation of my delegation to the distinguished representative of Norway and to the other Cor§erees who have produoed the draft resolution that has just been introduced dter prolonged and careful consideration. 15. Pending the introduction of a draft resolution, we have refrained from speaking at this session of the Security Council on the subject of apartheid. However, now that a draft resolution is before the Council for action, 1 should like to take the liberty of expressing the views of my Government on the subject of racial discrimination in the Republic of South Africa and on the draft resolution that has been introduced. 16. The apartheid policies of the Government of South Africa not only offend the principles set forth in the Charter; they challenge our determination to uphold these principles, and they challenge the ability of the United Nations to find the best means of influencing the course of South African history towards peaceful change. 17. South Africa’s racial policies haveforcedupon the United Nations the task of trying to persuade a Member State to alter a course of action whichaffects not only its own peoples, but the racial situation in the world ae large. The United Nations task is not only to help the majority of the peoples of South Africa to fulfil their 18. Ever since 1952, the General Assembly at its seventh session first, and then the Security Council, have sought to express the United Nations convictions and to impress its influence upon the situation which, because it involves violations of the Charter and because it may become even more serious, is a situation of international concern. In the world of today, no nation can be entirely “sovereign”; no nation cari ignore the impact of its national acts on the rest of mankind. 18. septi&me s6curité Nations parce et parce la d’aujourd’hui, “souverainR; aux répercussions, actes commis 19. In a recent address delivered at the University of California the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in comparing the evolution of the League of Nations and the United Nations, stated this idea very olearly; Vhe basis, he said, of both the League and the United Nations is the pledge by sovereign States ta co-operate, a pledge which involves some measure of sacrifice of sovereignty in the common interest. We are now moving away quickly from the world of compartmentalized self-suffioiency into a world where human solidarity daily becomes more essential,ng 19. à l’Université comparant celle de l’Organisation cette Nations ét6 fond6es verains ment suppose raineté d’un monde oh la solidarite 8n jour plus essentielleg, 20. In the second place, in their continuing concern for the situation in South Africa, the Member States of this Organization have adhered to the concept that the freedom of man anywhere is the concern of men everywhere. This concept is not only expressed in Article 55 of our Charter and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but is inscribed on the hearts of men of goodwill universally. 20. que leur Etats que ce pays, l’hrticle universelle universelle, mes de bonne volonté. 21. Pinally, the Member States of the United Nations have considered the policy of apartheid to be a racial issue and, therefore, of concern to a11 men. They consider it racist in its origins, arrogant in its implementation, and in its consequences potentially dangerous for all. 21. Nations est une question tous tique xaciste application quences éventuelles. 22. For many years the United States Government has urged the Government of the Republic of South Africa, bath within and outside the United Nations, to abandon this policy. I would add that opposition to apartheid in this country Springs from the very roots of our historical and political ideals. It is intensified by the determined efforts that we have now set in motion in this country to realize fully the society which th8Se ideals prescribe: one which affords equal and just treatment to a11 of our citizens without regard to race or religion and without discrimination of any kind. 22. Etats-Unis République Nations cette politique. qui se manifeste cœur Elle est intensifiée avons entrepris ment une soc&& société ment de religion 23. Since the Security Council last turned its attention to the question of apartheid new developments in South 23. Africa have increased our concern. Just last week we pour la dernike a11 learned with profound regret of the life sentences l’évolution imposed on eight of the defendants in the Rivonia trial, notre nous avons tous appris monthly Chronicle, vol. 1, NO. 1. May 1964. pp, 70-75. 2J Chronicle, 24. Since the Security Council last had occasion to consider apartheid, the promulgation of new laws of the kind described by the Special Committee on the Policies of apartheid of the Government of theRepublit of South Africa, the further additions to the military forces of South Afsica that might be used for interna1 suppression and the passage by the South Afrlcan Parliament of the discriminatory Bantu Laws Amendment Bill, a11 these indications give us little hope that the Government is changing its views of the status of non-whttes in South Africa. 25. There is no doubt in our minds that seeds of violence are planted by each one of these repressive acts, based upon the repugnant philosophy of apartheid. There is an increasingly dangerous interaction between repression and violence, and time is running out in which to turn the spiral down towards apeaceful solution. The moving statement of Nelson Mandela, spoken in his defence at the Rivonia tria& presented to the world the anguish and frustration of those struggling against the injustices of South Africa’s racialpolicies. 26. Since the adoption of the Seourity Council’s resolution of 4 December [S/5471],3/ the Council has received two reports from ths Special Committee [S/5621 and S/5717]4/ and the report of the Secretary- General [S/5658] Y which contained the report of the Group of Experts which he appointed under the terms of that resolution. We have examined the various conclusions and recommendations of these bodies with tare. Wbile we have a number of reservations about certain aspects of these reports, and in particular do not subscribe to the reoommendations of paragraph 121 of the report of the Group of Experts, we share the intense concern which they reflect. We very much regret that the South African Government did not choose to afford the Group of Experts an opportunity to visit South Africa and thus to enhanoe the objectivity and the accuracy of their report. Such a visit would, we think, have faoilitated the Group’s task. >/ Officia1 Records of the Security Council, Eighteenth Year, Supplement for October. November and December 1963. 4/ Same text as A/5692 and A/5707 respectively. (Sec Officia1 Records of the General Assembly, Nineteenth Session, Annexes). 5/ Officia1 Records of the Security Council. Nineteenth Year, Supplement for Aprjl, May and .June 1904. 28. The first link in such consultation must be the establishment of communication, We would hope that ths South African Government, for its Part, would respond favourably to such a concept, would co-operate with the United Nations and would seek such assistance, bath within and outside the United Nations, as might be useful. 28. devrait muniquer . Nous osons sud-africain, une telle et rechercherait, l’assistance 29, We also see merit in the concept of a special training and education programme for South Africans to bs established under the auspices of the UnitedNations. Such a programme would afford to those South Africans who have ohosen to leave their country or who have littls access to higher education within their country, a chance to pursue their studies elsewhere, The United States is prepared to examine opportunities to contribute to such a programme bothfinancially and in terms of scholarship and other facilities at American educational institutions. There is much interest throughout the world in such a programme and much willingness to help in providing educational opportunities for South Africans. In the past, however, there has been some diffioulty in finding the best way of applying offers of assistance. We would envisage that such a programme, if established, would provide a useful central pointfor administering effectively educational assistance for South Afrioans. 29. relative et Africains, Nations Africains qui n’ont que peu de chances d’accbder ment supgrieur études les tant du point de vue financier ses sements gramme entier, des possibilités par mettre d’assistance. &ait l’administration Africains 30. Much has been said here in the Council and else- 30. where on the question of sanctions, My Government de la question continues ta believe that the situation in South Africa, siste though charged with sombre and dangerous implicapour lourde tions, does not today provide a basis under the Charter qu’elle for the application by the Security Council of coercive prendre measures. Nor cari we support the concept of an ultitives, matum to the South African Government which could be perspective interpreted as threatening the application of coeroive sud-africain, measures in the situation now prevailing since, inour une menace d’appliquer tiew, the Charter clearly does not empower the Securila situation ty Council to apply coercive measures in such a situan’autorise tion, However, the Group of Experts has suggested that & appliquer a stndy of sanctions be undertaken. My government has aven this proposa1 serious and prolonged considerasituation. noncé en faveur tien and would be prepared to support the initiation of vernement a PrOperly designed study and to participate init. And let me be explicit. Our willingness to see such a study temps donner son accord pour qu’une Etude convenablement go forwardunder certain ciroumstances or our willingnsss to Participate in such a study represents in no way conçue soit je dois bien préciser an advance commitment on the part of my Government to snPPort at any specific time the application under qu’une étude de ce genre soit entreprise tha Charter of coercive measures with regard to the taines South African situation or any other situation, Nor cela ne signifie should this Position be interpreted as relating to our nement s’engage view Of the situation in South Africa today or what it don& mesures maY become tomorrow. We do feel that such a study, tf agreed to by the Council, could make a contribution Afrique to a fullsr understanding on the part of the Council. ne doit pas Whila Our support for such a study and agreement to duisant du Sud telle 31. Like other Members of the United Nations, we continue to search for practical means of bringing about in South Africa the changes we a11 seek. In a spirit of fairness we must search for means and steps which would have apractical andbeneficial effect on the present situation. This has been the spirit of the resolutions adopted by the Council last August and December, and we believe that it is the spirit of the resolution just introduced by the representative of Norway. Needless to say, we Will continue to adhere to the past resolutions of the Security Cou&l and we Will continue to searoh for ways of impressing upon the Government of South Africa the conviction of our Government and people that only through a policy of justice and equity for a11 of its peoples cari it look forward to a peaceful future.

My speech will be very short, At yesterday afternoon’s meeting 1 stated the position my Government on the problem of apartheid, a position that has remained the same during the many occasions on which this subject has beendiscussedin the General Assembly and now in the Security Council. 33. 1 said yesterday [1132nd meeting, para. 291 that the Bolivian delegation had welcomed the suggestion for the creation of a special committee of experts which, within the framework of the United Nations Charter, would study the most adequate and effective means of putting an end to this tragedy through which the South African people was passing. 34. The Bolivian delegation has followed very closely and has been present at the various stages in the elaboration of the draft resolution which the representative of Norway, Ambassador Nielsen, has just submitted to us alter laborious efforts and long discussions. Bolivia takes particular satisfaction in supporting the draft resolution which the representative of Norway has read out, and, for its part, urges the great Powers and the other countries which have influence with the Government of South Africa to persuade it, before any measures are taken, of the need to revise its policy of racial domination which is a cause of indignation throughout the world. 35. Bolivia takes special satisfaction in co-sponsoring, with the delegation of Norway, the draft resolution in question.

1 have no iùrther speakers on my list. May 1 suggest to mem- CAMEROON/CAMEROUN: LIBRAIRIE DU PEUPLE AFRICAIN La G&ants, 8. P. 1197. Yaound& DIFFUSION INTERNATIONALE CAMEROUNAISE Du LIVRE ET OE LA PRESSE, Sangmaloma. CZECHOSLOVAKlA/TCHÉCOSLOVAQUlE: ARTIA LTO., SD “e SmsEk&zh. OENMARK/OANEMAR,k NOlrrssadB 6, Klbanha”“. FINLANDIFINLANOE: 2 Ka.kusk&. Helsink,. CONGO (Liop.ldville): INSTITUT POLITIQUE CONGOLAIS, a. P. 2307, L&poldvIlle. FRANCE: bITIONs 13. T”e SQ”ff,O,. Par,* ETHIOPIA/~THIOPIE: INTERNATIONAL PRES AGENCY, P. 0. 80x 120. Addis Ababa. GERMANY (FEDERAL ALLEMAGNE (RtPUBLIQUE R. EISENSCHMIDT GHANA: UNIVERSITY BOOKSHOP Unwerrity Colles~ of Ghana. lego”. ACCIB. KENYA: THE E.S.A. BOOKSHOP. BDX 30167. Nairobi. Schwanfhaler St,. 59, ELWERT UND MEURER Ha”pts,r?,sss 101. Berhn.Schonsberg. ALEXANDER HORN Spiegelgasse 9. Wiesbaden. W. E. SAARSACH Gert,uden.traare JO. LIGYA,LIwE: SUIMI EL JERS, (BOOKSELLERS) P. 0. BOX 78. Ist,k,al street, Benghazi. MDRDtCD,MAROC: AUX BELLES IMAGES 281 Avenus Mchammad V, Rabat. NlOERIA/NlC~RlA: UN,“ERS,TY BOOKSHOP (NIGERIA) LTD U”l”sr*lty College, Ibada”. GREECE/ûRÉCE: KAUFFMANN 28 Stadio” Strael. Athens. ““NGARYJHONSRIE: P. 0. Box 149. Badatrert NORTHERH RHoOESlAjRNODiSlE DU NORD: J. BELDING. P. 0. Box 760, Mufulira. ICELAND~ISLANDE: EYMUNOSSONAR H. Austurstraeti 18, ReWavlk. NYAS*LAND,NYASSALAND: BOOKERS (NYASALAND) LTD. Lwtym Housa, P. 0, BOX 34. Bla”tyr.3. IRu.ANo,IRLANDE: STATIONERY OFFICE, SOUTH AFRG,,AFRIQt,E DU SUD: “AN SCHAIK’S BOOH STORE (PTYJ LTD. Church street. BOX 724. Pratotia. TECHNICAL SOoKS (PTY.) LTD.. Faraday Houx P. 0. Box 2866. 40 St. G..rm’i Strset. Cape Town ITALI,ITALIE: LIBRERIA COMMISSIONARtA Via GinoCsoDo”, 26. Flrenze. d ma PaoloMerc”” 1903. SOUTHERN RHODESIA/RHODÉSIE DU SUD: THE BOOH CENTRE, Fus, Strwt. Sallshury. AGENZIA E.I.O.U., Via LUXEMBOURB: LIBRAIRIE J. TAAUSCHSCHUMMER Place du ThéStra. L”xembo”,B. TANGANYIYA: DAR Es SALAAM BOOKSHOP P. cl. BOX 9030, Dar es Salaarn. NETHERLANOS,PAYS-BAS: N. V. MARTINUS NIJHOFF LE!“S? VOOrho”t 9. ‘r.Gra”e”hsae “0.4NDA,O”OAND.4: UGANDA SDOKSHOP. P. 0. BOX 145. Ka”%.ela. “NITED ARAB REPUBLICIRÉPUBLJQUE ARABE UNIE: LIBRAIRIE “LA RENAISSANCE D’EGYPTE” 9 Sh. AdlY Parha, cawo. AL NAHDA EL ARABIA BOOKSHOP 32 Abd.el.Khalsk Sarwarl St,, Caire. NoRWAV/NORVËGE: Ko,, Jo”a”5gate. 4,. Oslo. POLAND/POL~BNE: wars2awa. PORTU(IAL: LIVRARIA ASIA/ASIE 186 Rua Aurea. L,sbas. RDMANIA,RO”MANIE: Sir. Ar,s,,de Srmnd 14.18. P. 0. BOX 134.135. s”c”re~tl. GWiMAlBlRMANlE: CURATOR, e.OYT. SOOK DEPOT. Rangoon. CAMSODIA,CAMBDDGE: ENTREPRISE KHMÈRE SPAIN,ESPAGNE: LISRERIA BOSCH, Ro”da LIBRERIA MUNDI.PRENSA. AGUILAR 5. A. DE EDICIONES, DE LIBRAIRIE Imprmlerie 84 Paptter1e. 5.1 R. L.. Phnom~Penh. CLYLON~ZEYLAN: LAKE HOUSE SOOKSHOP ho~byw”pe’s 0, CWlO”. P. 0. BOX 244. SWEDEN/SUËDE: C. KUNGL. WOYBOKHANDEL Fredssata” 2. Stwkhclm. CHINA/CHINE: THE WORLD BODK COMPANY. LTD. 99 Chu”@ King Road. la, Sec,,o”. Taqeh. Tswa”. SWITZERLANO/SUISSE: LIBRAIRIE PAYOT, S, A.. HANS RAUNHARDT. THE COMMERCIAL PRES!$. LTD. 211 Hona” Road, Shannhai. T”RKE”,TURQ”,E; 469 lst~klal Caddes,. seyosl”, HONG KONO,“ONG-HONG: THE SWINOON BOOK COMPANY 25 Matha” Road, Kowloon. UNION OF SOYIET SOCIALIST UNION DES REPUBLIQUES SOVIETIQUES: MEZHDUNARODNAYA INoIA,INDL: ORIENT LONGMANS Bombay. oalC”tts, Hyderabad. btaarar & Ne”t DelhI. OXFORD BOOK & STATIONERY COMPANY Calcutta 6 New Delhi. KNYIGA Smolenrkaya “NITED KINGDOM,ROYAUME-UNI: H. M. STATIONERY OFFICE P. 0. SI)X 569. London. hmd HMSO branches Bnrtol. Gard,,,. Edmbursh. INDONESIAJINDONÉSIE: PEMBANGUNAN. LTD. Gunung Sahari 84, Dpkarta. JAPANJJAPON: MARVZEN COMPANY. LTD. 6 TcwNiehoms, N~ho”bashi. Tokyo. YUGOSLAVIAIYOUGOSLAVIE: CANKARJEVA 2ALOZB.A L,“bl,a”a. Slavenia. DRt?AVNO PREDUZECE Jusoslevanska Kn,qa, PROSVJETA 5. Tr9 Brststva I ,edl”st”a. PROSYETA PUBLISHING lmpOrt.ExpOrl Oi”1510”. KOREA (REF. OF)/CORkE (RÉP. DE): EULYOO PUSLISHINS CO.. LTD. 5.244, ChorYdno. SOLWI. PAKISTAN: THE PAKISTAN CO.OPERAT,YE SOOK SOCIETY oacca. E?&t Pakmtan. PUBLISHERS UNITE& LT&. Lahore. THOMAS & THOMAS. krach,. TeFAN 16,l. aeoarad. PHILIPPINES: PHILIPPINE EDUCATION COMPANY. INC. 1104 Castillelo~. P. 0. Box 620. Qwapo. Mamla. POPULAR 6ODKSTQRE. 1573 Do,,,,~ Jose. Ma”,la. LATIN AMERICA/ AMÉRIQUE LATINE ARGENT,NA,ARGENTINE: SUDAMERICANA. S.A., S,NOIPORE,SfNGAPO”R: THE CITY BOOK STORE. LTD.. Coll~er Quay. ROLIVIA,BOLI”IE: LISRERIA oasr,,a 972. La Par. LOS AMIGOS DEL LISRO Calle Perd enq. Espana. T”A,LAND/TNAïLANDE: PRAM”AN MIT. LTD. 65 Chakrawat Road, Wat Tuk. Bangkok. NIBONDH a CO.. LTD. New Road, Siknk Phya Srr, sanskok. SUKSAPAN PANIT Manslon 9. Rapdamner” A”B”“0. Bangkok. BRdZILJBRÉSIL: LIYAARIA RUB Méxwx 98.8. omxa RIO de ,aneuo. LIVRARIA FRE]TAS SASTOS. Caixa P.x,al 899. F”a VIET-NAM CREP. OF)lVlhNAM (RiP. D”): LIBRAIRIE.PAPETERIE XU&N THU 185. rue Twda. B. P.283. Saison. LIVRARIA KOSMDS EDITORA RU~ ~osa,,o 135,137, CHILL,CHILI: EDITORIAL DEL PAC/FICO Ah”mada 57. Sa”,ia@. LIBRERIA WENS, Casdla EUROPE *“SmIA,A”TRICHL: GEROLO & COMPANY. Grsbsn 31. Wien. 1, GEORG FROMME dr CO.. Spengeraasse 39. WW”. v. q ELGIUM,BELGIQ”E: AGENCE ET MESSAGERIES DE LA PRESSE, S.A. 14.22, rue du P=%*I,, Bruxsller. SOLOMBIA,COLOMBIL: LIBRERIA AMERICA. L,.sRERIA BUCHHOLZ Av.JimBne~ de Quesada GULGAFilAfBUlGARlE: RAZNOïZNOS 1, x?.¶r As**“. sat,a. COSTA RICA: IMPRENTA ,4(7art.do 1313, Sa” JO.6. Litho in U.N. Pri~e: $U.S 0.35 (or equivalent in other currencies)