S/PV.234 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
2
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
General debate rhetoric
Security Council deliberations
UN membership and Cold War
General statements and positions
The agenda was that of the 232nd meetinç (S/Agenda 232).
The system of simultaneous interpretation was adopted at this point.
The system of consecutive interpretation was resumedat tms point.
1 havenot yet been informed·as to the intentions of the' representative of Pakistan. Perhaps he would bekind enough to give us that information.
Sir Mohammed ZAFRULLAH KHAN (pakistan) Tb.ere arè a great many subjects in the statement which has been submitted by the representative of India, the correctness of the facts of which is questioned by my Government. Ishould like, with ,the permission of.the Security Counci1, to address "the Security Counci1, not at very great length,, with regard to sorne of the ·outstanding matters which have been touched upon by the representative of India. If the Security Council desires, 1 canstart now and resume tomorrow mornîng or tomorrow afternoon, whenever the Security Counéil reconvenes. 1 do not need, for. thïs pùrpose, to have an adjournmentin order to
Mr. NonL BAKER (United Kingdom) : In the Iight of what has just been said by the representative of Pakistan, it would evidently be rash for me to speak unill he has Il!ade the addition he desires to his previous statement. Perhaps it would be convenient to follow the course suggested by the representative of Pakistan. He could start bis statement now. If he does not finish tonight, he could 'carry on with the rest of it at a meeting to be held tomorrow morning. 1 propose that that be our course.
l'anglais) sentant déré qu'il complément être représentant commencer le au matin.
Mr. EL-KHOURI (Syria) : 1 think we 'have heard ~nough today. The hour is late. 1 should prefer that the Security Council now àdjourn, and the statement of the representative of Pakistan be given at the next meeting. His statement should he continuous, and should not be divided into two parts. If it were divided, at tomorrow's , meeting we should have forgotten what he said this evening. If is preferable that the stat~ment be given at one time. Therefore, 1 move the adjournment of this meeting.
Je aujourd'hui. Conseil le prochaine d'une était ce exposé de
'
!
i
ajournement? la posé
The PRESIDENT {tran..vlated from French) : Are there any objections to this adjournment? If· we are in agreement, we shall have to fix the date of j the next meeting. It has already been proposed that it should take place tomorrow morning.
l'anglais) de tive,
Mr. NOEL BAKER (Unit~d Kingdom) : Could the Security Council perhaps set a meeting for 10 a.m. tomorrow? If so, it might actually begin preciselyat 10.15 a.m.
Je se n'est en autant parmi qu'il
Mr. EL-KHoURI (Syria) : 1 do not think the Security Council can meet before the usual time of 10.30 a.m. It is not necessary to change our system, which has been in force for a very long time. . 1 think that Mr. Noel Baker wishes to make bis 'stay with us as short as possible, while 1, on the contrary, wish it to be longer. •
• .
l'anglais) soit plus Syrie, à préoccupe, au délégations semaine.
Mr NOEL BAKER (United Kingdom) : 1 do not insist 'On 10.15 a.m. as the time for the
~eeting. 1 should like to say that the longer 1 stay m contact with the Syrian representative, the greater my persona! pleasure. However, we are dealing with a very urgent situation. What 1 am concemed about is that we shall not allow the president of the Security Council and the two delegations to escape their weekend's work.
,
à matin
If there are no opjections, our next meeting will be held tomorrow morning at 10.30 a.m. The meeting roseat 5.45 p.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.234.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-234/. Accessed .