S/PV.2711 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
2
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Arab political groupings
Security Council deliberations
Global economic relations
War and military aggression
UN procedural rules
Peace processes and negotiations
In accordance with th@
decisions taken at the previous meetings on this item, I invite the Deputy Prime
Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iraq to take a seat at the Council
table; I invite the representatives of Argentina, Bangladesh, Egypt, the German
Democratic Republic, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Oman, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal,
TUniSia, Yugoslavia and Zambia to take the seats reserved for them at the side of
ihe Council Chamber; I invite the representative of the Palestine Liberation
Organization to take the seat reserved for him at the side of the Council Chatier,
At the invitation of the Presi?ent, Mr. Aziz (Iraq) took a place at the
Council table; Mr. Delpech (Argentina), Mr. Siddiky (Bangladesh), Mr. Abdel-Meguid
(Egypt), Mr. Ott (German Deruacratic ~&public), Mr. Salah (Jordan), Mr. Al-8abah
(Kuwait), Mr. Alaoui (Morocco), Mr. Al-Ansi (Oman), Mr. Kabar& (Rwanda),
Mr. Shibabi (Saudi Arabia), Mr. Sarre (Senegal), Mr. Bouziri (Tunisia), Mr. Golob
(Yugoslavia) and Mr. Mwananshiku (Zambia), and Mr. Khadoumi (Palestine Liberation
Organisation) took the places reserved for them at the side of the Council Chatier.
The PREEIDmT (interpretation from ; nit): I should Like to inform
mnahnre rrc b-be r--.,-,,cfl f&t 1 -c .--..- -- u .H.. h;a;-c CrCek<& letiecs ;COii tic i~pi&eri&+i.;iit.S VI
Afghanistan, Chad, Cuba and Mexico in which they request to be invited to
participate in the discussion 0,” the i tern OR the council’s agenda. In accordance
with the usual practice, I propose, with the consent of the Counc!.l, to invite
(The President)
those representatives to participate in the discuasian without the right to vote,
in accordma with the r&want prwisiars of the Charter md rule 37 of the
Council% prwieioual rules of ptoceduce.
There being no objectian, it is 80 decided.
Mr. ZaCif (Af*anistan), Mr. Lassou (Chad), Mr. Velazco S8u Jcse (Cuba) and
MC. Maya Palencia (Maxi=) took the plaO88 reserved for them at the aide of the
Council CharPber.
The S:ourity Council will
now resume it8 consideration of the item on it8 agenda=
Mr. RAsmSRI (Thailand)% Pitet of all I should like to convey to YOUI
Sir, the warm felicitstione of my delegation and my own sincere congratulations On
yOut aS8uIIptiCm of the presidency of the Security Coumil for this month. It is
suet gratifying to see such 8 distinguished Asian proeidiug aver our deliberatiOmr
par titularly on UUdl an issue of Such importianoe , whiti affects ypur regim ana
which ha8 serious implications for that strategic part of Asia and beyond* RY
delegatim is confident that with your reuogniaed diplasaetic skill and experience
you will guide the COWWZi1’8 proceeding8 to a 8UCCeSSfUl CoJWlU8i~.
I should also like to convey, on behalf of my delegatim and on my am behalf,
out desp appreciation to your distinguished predecessor, Ris RWellexoy Aubassador
Aleksandc Mikhailwich Eelmogov, Permanent Rt3spresentative of the unicm of Soviet
Socialist F4publics, for the skilful manner in which he eanducted thewffkof the
colmcil last month.
The conflict betueen Irma and Iraq, nw in its wrath year o haa omtinUe8 t0
exact a heavy toll ana has imposea unmitigated suffering md hardehip on both
partiea. It has had serious repercussims and ha% heightened the tension
throughcut the Gulf area. More recently, it has threatened ta spill CNeC intO
(Mr. Kaeemsr I, Thailand)
neighbouring corntries) thus its dastablliaing effects are being felt with mwnttng
Cmcern in the region and boyond. Given the rtretagtc imporlmce of the reglm,
its imprct on international peace and stability cannot be overestimated. In the
light of that fact, the Securi& Council has not been indifferent to the dangerous
situaticm and it would be difficult indeed to find any 0th~ matter on which the
CoUncil has rtteained ~m5moua in its pera#ian of the sfsmele8snesa of the
situation and of the tcagic waste and in its realisation of the need ta bring the
Conflkt to a speedy end.
The Secre~ry-Gsneral, Tao, has put forth tireless efforts to assist the
parties in alleviating the consequences of the canflict and to bring the war itself
to en end. Even thou# his role is reagnized by both par ties, he has candidly
informad us @hats
Wnfor tunstely, It is evident nau that so far thoee efforts have not aaieved
substantive progress towards the intendad goal - the ending of the war*”
(SmJ.2709, p. 7)
(EC. Rammsr i, Thailand)
The &aetary-General valt arr
.The vital question, of cmurse, ir vhat nev effort8 osn be deployed to
secure a negDti&ted l ettleaent. Six re6olutiono of the Security Coutmil
remain a6 mtt of the ctQoed, without satisfactary implcuentatim. Xraq has
stated that St i#~ villiug to comply with all of them. Iran haa indioated that
it ie not prepmred to accept them, on the ground that the Cotmcil has not
dealt with Xran’a fmdammntsl griwancea: (WPV.2709, ~0 7-6)
The Comcil’m stand of griuciple cm all aspects of the conflict ie vell knan,
and so ate the genuine efforta by the pceseut Council to adrieve a balanced text*
as exemplified by remlutia, 582 (1986) - all this to no avail.
With increasing conearn, the Comcil aerkmro on 29 Augwt 1986 reweubad the
President to eend a letter bo the Secretsry+mual, expreseing their euwrt for
his cartiming effort to a-18 the cmflict, end reaffirsiug their view that
raolutia 582 (1986) te~ai~M the wwt talesrat basis fog a aettlmnt. ny
delegatiar viehes to reiterate ite full confidarcre in, as vell as its 8incete
appteciaticn of, the Secretary-(ienepal% role in that regard.
Thailaud enjoys diplomatic telatione with both portiaa. In the general debate
at the currant saseicm of the (ihneral AgeerPbly, His mcelleucy Air Chief MetrPIal
Siddhi Saveteila, Minister of Faeign Affairs of Thailgd, on 30 SBpte*Wr
addreseed the follaoing appeal to thamt
We vieh to see our tvo friends refrain from any actier whi& vould further
aggravvete We eStuatiaPr. We call upco them to take a paaceful and negntbted
route Warda resolving their diffetea?cee.m (h/dl/PV.17, pp. 34-55)
The XR~IDBNT (interpretiticm fran Arabic): X thank the represeniativit
of Thailand for hiS kind irorda addreseed to me and my country.
The next speaker ie the representative of Saudi Arabia. X invite him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his stittsment.
Mr. SHIWABI (Saudi Arabia) (interpretatio.1 from Arabic) r I am pleased to
congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council
for this month. We are confident that with your eminent qualities and wise
leadership you will & able to guide the Council’s proceedings towards the desired
results. The bonds between our two countries defy definition and are so strong ao
to be beyond description.
I also have the pleasure of congratulating Ambassador Belcrllogov, last month’s
President, who so ably directed the Council*8 proceedings, in a mannar that earned
the appreciation and respect of all.
This ia not the firat time that we have come to the Security Council in an
international initiative to stop the bloodletting between Iraq and Iran, and it
seems to me that it will not be the laat.
The development of the tragedy so far , and what it will cost the people of the
two countries, over and above what it has already cost, makes this appeal today
from the Security Council a world appeal for a comprehensive and just peace between
the two countries, an appeal that should have a Beeper significance than the
appeala of the paet, because the dam is almost bursting , and the minds and souls of
the people of the world are suffering the burden of the continuation of a war that
ha5 become meaningleae.
There is no victor or vanquished, and there are no indications that the war
will reault in any victor or vanquished. It has entered its seventh year* and the
people6 of the two brother countries have suffered more than enough, paying a
toll in blood every day for the past six year6 , beyond what any people should be
called on to bear; and yet they still face a stork future. In their early hietory
each of those two peoples built a great civilization that gave an impetus to human
progressuntil the two peoples ftaternized and were fused into one entity by the
(Mr. shihabi, 8auaf Arabia)
religion and civilisation of Salsm, which united their hearts and swords a8 Well as
their means of livelihuod.
The true religion of Islam rejects the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of
innocent souls in a war that has lost its meaning and aubatance, a war with no
reasonable objective or acceptable significance. Islam calls upon the peoples of
Iraq and Iran to make peace with their brothers. Islam rejects unjustifiable
killing.
We Say that So that those in charge wfll review their eeeeeerpent of the truth
shout what is taking place, looking at the war fran outside the battlefield and
examining and assessing it from an independent position.
Iraq has agreed to end the war and resort to arbitration in accordance with
international rules. We sincerely hope that the Muelim voice of Iran will give a
positive response and rise above the level of the contlict, in order to 8ave the
blood of Muelims.
The purpose of the appeal that will be Before the Council in the form of a
draft resolution is to explain to the fighting parties that the peace-loving world
inaiete on putting an end to the war , absolutely rejects its continuation and is
not convinced that the objection5 to ending it have any juetification-
Needless to SSy# what is happening to navigation in the Gulf, in the form of
obstructions and damage to shipping, is a bad omen of possible developPent if the
war continues end attscks resume in an environment charged with the dangers of
deepening and perpetuating the tragedy.
We all know that if peace and good-neighbourly retatione are to be achieved,
sacrifices must be made to arrive at a sound formula to solve the problems of war
and peace. We all know even better that those sacrifices, no matter how
substantial, are still less than the sacrifices in terms of a human life and of the
(Mr. Shihabi, Saudi Arabia)
deNrwtion of countrio that would ba mado if the war continues. The fuel for
tbom huge l crifioial pyres im the flowor of the youth of the two countrlea, whose
oorpoem are littering the barren rtretchem of the battlefield& ThOre sacrifLce8
and theme victim are beyond prim, in term8 of either war or p4mce. To whose
benefit ia the war? And for what end doe8 it continue, 80 that we have to pay the
price in human tragedies and ecoxmic disasters inflicted on our two brother
pwpler3
We know that a resolution of the Security corprcil would not stop this war; but
a unified stand by the Urited Nations and the peoples of the world would make the
fighting parties realise that we & not appcave of this warI a sad war that is a
burden on the human amscienae. Such a stand should have an effect upon the minds
of those decision-makers who are rejectianists. we do not doubt that they mess
S~SitiVe 8~18, bemuse the h=itiMian ethic mates from the conscience of
peoples and nations, becau5e they are human and have families and relatives, as do
the rest of the people affected by the consequences of these massacres on the
battlefield.
This way is wrarg. No gRe is infallible, but we say to our brothers who thCcW
their own children into the battle that it is high time to redress the wrong by
means other than total&structicn. Destructicm and ruin Bo not redress wrongt on
t+e cantracy, they deepen the wounds , uhich will be difficult to heal in the
lifetime of present or aoming generations.
Why continue thie war ma threaten *ace, security and normal life in the
area* with all the implications that this threatening eituation has for Other
region5 and for the interests of many States? we should beware of the continuance
of the war between these two neighbouring countries and of the mietake of it5 saOPe
uihnh9 in sud a way as to bring about strong reactfans. we Should all be
careful, first and foremost the people of the area,to preserve the understanding
that ha5 chMacterised out relaticns and the amity desired by all.
We all reaognize that the simplest humanitarian standards require the ending
of this war. 18 it possible for the United Natiars to stand by as a spectator from
-Y-.uu4k4l4+V? now aI, or far the ~cur~ty comcii not to PwriiiW it.Z b~p---------~
(Hr. Shihabi, Saudi Arabia)
Let us work to persuade the world public to raise their voices above
everything aud declare publicly what we eay at our restrioted wtingsr stop this
war in accordance with international arbitration am3 international law and ~KWREL
Persistence in striving to achieve this goal is a responsibility from which no one
is exempt.
We call upon the Council to adopt the resolution submitted to it without
delay. It is an appeal for a just and viable peaceI aud it is one of our primary
responsibilities to eupport its substance and content. we call upon our neighbour,
Iran, to respond to the appeal for a peace that will bring it prosperity and
satisfy the world’s conscience.
we greatly hope that the Council will take a responsible etaud that clearly
reflects wxld public opinion and recognizes the implications for the united
Natione of the continuance of this war.
The ~SIDENT (interpretation fran Arabic): I thank the representative
of Saudi Arabia for the kind mrds he addressed to ms*
The next speaker is the representative of Bangladesh, whom I invite to take a
place at the Council table and to make a statement.
Mr. SIDDIRY (Bangladesh): I am thankful to you, Sir, for according me
this opportunity to speak this afternoon. May I commence by extending to you my
eincere and heartfelt congratulationa upon your assumption of the presidency of the
council. I have no doubt that your well-known qualities of head and heart will
enable you to guide our deliberatione to a fruitful conclusion. I join my other
colleagues in expressing sincere appreciation of the effective conduct of the
affairs of this body by your predecessor, Ambassador Belonogov of the Soviet Union.
I have asked to be allowed ta speak because to UB in Bangladesh the item Q1
our agenda, .The situation beween I ran and Iraq*, is a crucial one. I feel that,
if I did not add my voice to thcee of my many colleagues in urging the need for
peace, I should have aimed by silence.
The continuing fratcicidal war between ILM and Irarq an8 the coneerquent
sufferings cause us deep pain and ~guish. Wee all wars, this too has destroyed
and divided. It has brought ruin upon the edifiags of two of the world’s most
ancient and glorious culturea. It has generated far mote heat than light. It has
tJ=eatened to tear to shreile the fabric of Islal~ic unity. It cannot but be a sad
chaptar in the annals of our times. The somer we close this chapter the better
for all of us. . Time and again the international omnunity has endeavoured tc bring the
belligerents to the negotiating table, but to no avail. As a menber of the Peace
Ccumittee 8et up by the Organiaaticn of the Islamic Cmference, Bangladesh has been
an active participant in this effort. Ist me assert mequivocally ohat -gLadeah
ia prepared to do all within its power to advance the cause of paaoe. We firmly
believe that both Iran and Iraq are keen to end this tragic episode in their
relations. Sadly, the various mete of term proposed have failed to ceaeive the
hole-hearted eupport of both parths. W~I should ako bear in mind that the
pec~les of boUl teen and lreq will need to be satisfied that the terms are
honourable. L8t us tsy, thetefae, to design tie peace formule accof(linqly. Bete
mY delegatim wculd like tc acknmledga with greet appreciation tie imporunt
efforts mule by our f&wretary-General to bring peace to the region.
-L*- .8.&D jzix, :%?L,, bZ bwtt *:?~e*A Tn*-rnnticnal Year of Peace. --.___ -.- Let this be
an impcrtant watertied Pram wbictr to make yet another maesive effcrt. 9baayr with
this in minc9, I wish to voice a fixvent aepeal to my Iranian and Iraqi brothers.
(Mr. Siddiky, Bangladeah)
The eyes of the world aPe focused an them. Cat those eyes behold a supeeme exaaple
of belligerents’ having risen above theit self-in-rest for the gem&s and nobler
cbuse of peace. That peace is in the interest of all is beymd debate. fat the
fighting cease forthwith. Let the modalities of peace be worked out in due
course. Iat the parties show their dauntless cowage in accepting peace as they
have displayed it in going to wat. As soldiers of peace let them rebuild a
structure of harmany that will long endure. rt IS not just the hope and desire of
Wslims but the cherished aspiration of peoples everywhere.
P say this to my brothers in Iean and Iraq. A large segment of 0uP globe
Pemaina underpe ivileqd. Billiane are poor and hungry in this votld of scaece
PesouPces. Est us, thetefare, not deplete these resources 01 the battlefield. Ist
US use them not to wage wae but to wage peace and developaeht.
To thcee rplo have watked for peace, including the Sectetary-General and the
SWIM ity Council, we give OUT thanks, but theit labours should be mope aptly
rewarded by the CeSm&tion of these hostilities.
The PREsR?afT (interpPetatia\ fern Arebic)r I thank the repesenP;ative
of Bangladesh far the kiud words he addressed to me.
The next speaker is the mmty Prime Ministec and Minister for Foreign Affairs
of Kuwait, Sheikh S&ah Al Ahmad Al Jabar Al-Sabah. I welcome him and invite him
to take a place at the Council table and to make a statemmt.
Mr. AL-SASAH (Kuwait) (intetpretatim from Arabic)% My country~e
dalega tion is particularly pleased to see you, sir, presiding wer the Sacurity
Council this mmth, since you tepreseot a sister ArJ, oouhtry from the Arab Gulf
regiul. Your presidaucy reflects the ei~ificamx of that region in international
allACtiVe action and the con&fbutim of ita people8 to the a&ieVemnt of
Beeufity, stability and proepetity fat the woold. WA are c4nfide.M that you will
succeed in your task, thanks to your unique ek ill and experience wbid, you will
mdoubtedly txing to heap in shouldering the responsibilities of this lofty office.
I wish also to command the valuable SRI k done by Ambaaeaibr Kalamgov,
Perasnent Repcasaotitive of the Souiet UIim, during the past amtb*
Wday we are 0noB again addressing the Council on the Iran-Iraq amflict.
flaving entezed its seventh year, this military carflict has now beccaaa the longest
of the century - a omtury replete with ecientific, intellectual and humanitarian
accaaglif3hment8 an rhich we pride ourselves , tbich has led us to reflect on the
leasars of the past and the wars end aonflicto that inflicted untold tragedies and
calamities upon amkind.
Thie conflict is raging between two neighbowing #oelem munt~ies that have
been linked throughout the ages by bond8 and rehtionships which should have
Wevented them Oroar slipping into tbe inferno of a sameless and aimless armad
carflict. It has taken an grave diaenaions , rhfch the Council teas idantified.
Since the outbreak of the conflict, Ule Couhcil hm there&xe adopted aix
resolutions and agreed upon a number of etatesents by itB President. These
teaolutime and etatemenes have all called for me p incipal and basic goal%
stopping the artaed oanflict aad having recourse to negbtiatiom doped at a just and
honourable solutim that protects the legitimate intersets of tiese two
neighbouring countries. They were also baaed on the Wited Kations Charter and On
the pr inciplas of intetnatimal law and vere in cmfotmity with the spirit of oue
(Mr. Al-Sebah, Kuwait)
true religion of Islam - the religion of tolerance, lwe, justice and dighityr in
whose liqlht bask the two parties to the conflict.
Ever since the carflict first erupted, individual, collective, regional and
internaticoal efforts have been energetically and actively mad5 to douse it5
flames. Those ho mdertook such well-meaning endeavours were mtivated by the
clear perception that the persistence and aggravation of the conflict without any
solution in sight was massively exhausting the resources and energies of the two
OXWtiieS involved in the dispute and also posing a direct threat to regional and
internatiaral peace and security. man the very outset we have eecoguized the
perils of this tragio amflict and we have therefore sought actively with our
brothers and friends to end it. My cotmtry, Kuwait, aud I persmally had the
hcmou Of conttibuting to many of three efforts aimed at bringing an end to the
caiflict.
After all those years, after all the heavy less in life and property of the
two neighbouring corntries and after all the consequences of the conflict that have
reached such a degree that the area’s security and safety are being threatened, we
now find ourselves ccnkmted with alarming indications heralding foreign
fntervmtim in this critical region of the world should the war linger cn and
expand to embroil counuies fhat are not party to it.
Against thie background we ask the follaving: Until when? What are we headed
for? Who benefits from all these tragedies? &ho can stop this dwastatinq
conflict and drive the danger away from the people8 of the region, and inbed of
the wosld? In the circufmtances, and since we are guided by our faith in and Out
ommaaeht to the ulited :!atiane Charter and ita lofty principles, we are obliged
to have recourse to the Comcil and its metiers, in the hope that they will
effectiW3l.y shoulder their responsibilities and seek mediately to implement the
Council ‘8 previous reeolutiona on the subject.
(Mr. Al-Sabah, Kuwait)
let us speak frankly. Each time we are driven by circurrBtanceS to bring our
Cause to the Council on a question that ha5 already been abeted several times and
on tiich rpany resolutions have been adbpted meetly with unanimity, our concern
about the role end efficacy of the secu~ ity council - the body on which the United
Nations Charter has vested special responsibility for the nraintenance of
inteCnatiOn81 mace and security - is heightened.
Our cmcecn sterpp from a profound belief in the role and Signific8nce of this
world Organizatian in general and the Security Council in particular. Ever since
the creation of this macstinery , mankind has solemly undertaken to have recourse to
it for solving differences; it has been held as the legitimate instrument for
settling disputes by peeaeful means instead of by resorting to the use of force.
whenaver we 8g8fn have rewurse to the Council to discuss the sam5 subjeotaatter,
it means that its resolutions have not been implementi, its will has not been
respected and in@r national legitimacy has been diecredited.
Kuwait believes that the me&era of the Security Council have to move from a
position Of theoretically registering their Q)ncern over the situation and their
desire to establish pe8ce to a prectical poeitian prwiding the necessary
conditions for ending the tragedy.
We eapact the Council truly and sincerely to fulfil the ceeponsibilitiee
incumbent upon it in the provisions of various Articles of the Charter which are
aimed at settling disputes by peaceful means and refraining from the use or threat
of um of force in international relations.
Iraq has reqmnded favourably to the Council'5 resoluticms; it ha6 accepted
them ald the Co~cil’~ manate in settiing ita diGpiG ii:tb I:=; Wd it h@ alao
eubscribed to all the endeavours and initiatives undertaken by many parties. xc4
hea itsellE introduced its own initiatives, the latest of which includes the
fom3atione that should be included in any just and comprehensive solution.
(Mr. Al-sabah, Kuwait)
Kfmrrtially, they ue ccrgrhdof comna~ly endaaed povtrioru of intrrnati~rl
law and inrrCruuntot compleb withdcawrl to intarnatimal bomdaeirs,
Irxapr&en8ive exchange of pcieonus of wu, oigdng of 8 pm00 md non=aggrWJion
agreement mb nukintacvanUan in interiml affairs.
(Ht. Al-Sabah , Kuua It)
Iraq also introduced proposals for arbitration to determine who started the
aggre88ia and has persisted in it. Mgrettably, that genuine desire by one party
to the confliot for the establishme& of peace was uot reciprocated by the other
party. Bawevet, we still hope that, out of conmrn for the security, peaoe and
safety of our region and tie wald, the ~sl&nic IIepublic of Iran will reconsider
its attitude regarding this omflict and take the internatfmal mnsensus on the
necessity of terminating &is war and having recourse to negotiations and an
hmourable peaoe ae adequate motivation for responding to the global appeal and to
the role played by this Couneil in solving disputes by peamful means0
Together with other nations of the world, we believe that military for-,
however great, of titwer kind and no matter aat the cauee of its yer cannot
ensure the establiehamnt of lasting peace and the peaceful, etable coexistince of
nations. Persistence in using force will umSoubtedly lead to further exacerbation
and complication of the situation and e-se tbe entire eegian to danger and
destructicn.
The heads of State or Goverrmmt of nm-aligmd countries met last month in
Barare and debated the various Ltematiaral situations and intractable disputes
that threaten ule security, stebility and unity of the countries metiers of the
Hatemmt and international peace and security. First am4mg euoh conflicts is the
Iran-Ir4 war, on which the leader8 of the nan-aligned countries agreed on a clear,
forthright text that reaffirmed the ihwitabilify of applying in this conflict the
pr incigle of the nawuse of force in internatimal relatims and urged both Iran
and Iraq immediately to cease military action in order to prwsnt further loss of
life and propxty. The Reads of State or Govet rwnt also v&red to & their utreost
to help to king thie tragic dispute to an immdiate end. That tart acOllwed a
general consensus amg the leaders of the M#v@mnt’s Seder muntriee ad was
incorporated in the Political Declaration that they adopted. me therefore oome to
this Council supported by that collective paeitian a&pted by the Non-Aligned
mVe194nt, which comprises 101 of the nations of the world. The !&cucity Council’s
cancucrence with and endorsement of the derads arade by the non-a’ igned corPltr ie*
at their suaait meeting in Harare would represent a trimph for right and justice
and a ctntribution towards ending this devaetating war in our region.
Since the outbreak of this omflict the Secret4ty4eneral of the United
Nations has exerted considerable and sincere efforts to bring it to an end and
avert its effecte and the danger of its scope being widened. While thanking him
fa undertaking these valuable endeavours and for the realistic report he submitted
to the Council last Priday, Kuwait is hopeful that he will remain indefatigable in
his efforts to ensure a praarpt and apee* end to this war asr the basis of the
prhcipl@S which the intirmtianal 00mnuniCy has accepted 88 providing the best
meane of solving any oarflict in our wacld.
We in Kuwait feel the enamsua danger more than others and have an
wect;hehing eense of the menace of its exacerbation and the consrquence~ for
security in our regian. Becsuee MI are anxious for peace and good-neighbourliness
with Iran, our Muslim neighbour , and for coexistence and fruitful oudperation
bewmn our oeoples, we have come with our brother aret&~ers of the Comittee of
Seven. to prt this question before the S0curity Council ~lce again. We expect the
Council to play a more effective role than in the past, a role that derives from
the responsibility that it bears for wald peace, a role that pits right in
perspective, prevents Banger and en& the conflict.
The RRFBID~T (interpretetial from Arabic)t I thank the Ueprty Prime
Minister snd Miniefer of &reign Affairs of Kuwait foe the kina lards he niWr-=PA -- _-- --
to ‘PB.
The next speaker ia the representative of the Ftman Democratic Eiapublic. I
invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make a statementnc. o??l! (Gecxan Democratic Mieprblic): Permit me at the very outset, Sic,
to convey to you my varm congratulations ~1 your assumption of the pcesiaency f0c
the mcmth of Ocbobec and to wish you success in that responsible task.
At the same time I should like to express thanks and appreciation to the
PerPanent Representativeof the Soviet Uniar, Alexander Mikhailovich Belcmogov, for
the excellent way he caracted the pcoceeaings of the Council in the month of
Saptembec .
The delegatia, of the German ~eaiooratio IPBpublic has asked to speak fn tbis
debate in ora= toexgfeso, like manyother States, iteasep caicern wet the
oontinuing war between Xcan and Iraq, which has led to untold human suffering ana
awtabti0n 0n both da66 We Beploce this, particularly since it is a
aBnfccmtaticm between two ncm-aligned States whose peoples have contiibumd so much
to world aivilization and today have: to oope with many couuam tasks in their social
and emnomia developPent, two States with which the Gmnan Democratic Republic
maintains friendly relations.
My aelegaticm shares the view that the tragic conseWence8 of this oonfl i&
havealready dalegreat harm to the two peoples and prevent them from using their
potential to the full in the anti-~mpecialist atcuggle.
fn this amtext, I should like to stress mat my country ie linked with the
aountcies of that cegiar by efforts to seouce world peeoe and the search for a
canprehensive, durable and just solution to the problems in the Middle East.
The oontinuatia, of this military conflict greatly endangers stability and
security in the entire Gulf region. Fur thee wore, it it3 a serious thceat to wocld
peab-use the most ceactionacy imperfaliet forms ace using this conflict as a
pretext for growing interference ana their military presence in the region. FOC
these Reagan also the German Damoccatic Republic calls for a speedy tecminetiar of
the vat beWean Iran and Iraq and vafns against any outside intecference and
escalaticm and intecnationa~izatlon of the conflict.
In this ccmnection, the Germs DerPocratic Republic reaffirm8 its position that
oonflicb and disputes between State8 must be settled by peacraful aeans, with full
respect for the peoples’ right to self-determirrPrtian. This attitude is based on
the fundaPanta1 principle of OUT foreign policy that there is nothing more
important than tcsecure world peace-
In view of the attempte made by those in well-knwn imperialist quarters to
achieve their own hegemic aims by way of plotting regional canfliets, a speedy
and peaceful settlement of dispute8 is vory imprtent. This is especially true of
the ccnflict between Iran Md Iraq , two significant States of that regiar with
,i& the German Democratic F@ublic maintains multifarious relatiars.
&ly delegaticm, therefore, eupporto all initiatives which ace cardrcive to a
solution, en the basis of international lav, aoceptablo to both sides.
Prcm the first day of the conflict, the Germen DepDcratic Rqublic hao clearly
stated that disputes and military conflicti are not in the interest of the peoples.
Therefore, we very uah roqret that despite a nu&er of attempts to Settle the
Wnflict, no program has been achieved. t4everthele6e, tt is operative, in the interest of the people8 md of world peaom, to silence the guna and open the door
to negotiations. Everything ruet be done to convert the gulf region into a zcue of
peace end stability.
In a teneo interuational okuation, when the Purthar stockpiling of veapons
and the attempt to militarize outer space are threatening the very existence of
-kind, it haa nQs been pxsible, after amsietent efforta to a&ieve dialogue and
mde-rstanding and after unilateral measucea of good will and far-teaching
dieat-nt prqmmls, ta 0-a an encouraging signal.
The leading repeambtivelr of the gwiet miar and the Chited States will
ohatly continue their talks at a sumit meeting. ThauKB m the realism and
constructive approach of both eidee, it vaa ponsible a few day8 ago to reach
agreeaent ar that meting. With the continuatiar of tJ3ie dialogue all mankind
cherishes the hope fa disarmament aud durable peace, for new etepa to toI+leCe
amfrantation by comaon sense ana tealime. As the peoplee of the world rightfully
expect, the talks should alro provide an important impetus to a policy of
unLbtatanaing ma real&a in all 6ghhepes, and oreate an otIoosphere for the
promtion of peaceful settlement *an peace ie Lx&en. In this 8ent;e0 all
pussibilitiee for a eoluticm by negotiation to the tragic conflict betwen Zran and
Iraq ehould be used without MY further ashy.
what the peopl6s want and moo ia not the continuation of confrantetien, and
19-t. of all tie search for new weapons aystsara, but effective stem to end the
ama ram on Escth and prevent its epread to outer space. Pbr thi8, the Soviet
thim, the German WmcratLc Republic and other eocialiet Statfm have made
far-reaching proposals, tiich aleo take into consideration ideas and ccnoapts Of
the other aide.
Since the questions at issue directly affect the security of all oountries,
indeed the very existence of mankind, serious and businesslike dialogue assumes
immense importance.
This was and is the position of the arman pemqaatic I&public - the ponitiar
by which it is guided in its active peace policy. As waa underlined by my
c~Untry*s Head of State, ~ri.& flaecker, in our time, when the issues of war and
peace have shifted into the nuclear dimension , nothing can replace political
dialogue. It is of great importance for the relaxation of tensions% it deepens
mutual understanding and promtes oo*Peration*
My delegation believes thet this maxim is in accordance with the will and
vital interest of all peoples. This was illustrated by the eighth summit
conference of n--aligned countries at Harare and can also be seen from this
forty-first oession of the ulited Nations General AsserdDly. The announcement Of
the Boviet-American meeting indeed eends an enaoursging signal for all those who
hold dialogue and the peaceful settlement of diepltes cl-e to their heart.
The PRESIBENT (interpretetion fram Arabic): I thank the representative
of the German Derocra tic Republic for the kind words he addressed to UK?.
The next speaker is the representative of Cuba. I invite him to take a place
at the Council table and to rPdke his statement.
Mr* vf&M(z) 8A.N J0SE (Cuba) (interpretation from Spanish):
y=. p:e?&*t, 04+aC -9 al: up *elfi like te +c~wan OL_IP p~t+eure at eeaing YOU m--m -e
presi& over the Security Council. We are convinced that your prwen diplomatic
akill will ensure the ewroth progress in our work.
(Mr,. Velaaco San Jaee, Cuba)
I would also like to congratulate the Ambaosadot of the Soviet Ilniar,
Alewndsr Selamgov, for the very capable mamer in which he conducted the
p~0Oet3ahgs in the security council last SW.e*er.
The conflict which is trodmy claiming the attentim of the Security Council
broke out six year0 ago, and throughout thase years hundreds of thousand8 of men,
UOIDBn and children, cotiatants and civilians, have lost their lives in a war whi&
never should have begun. lb this terrible toll can be added the destruction of
both a~~ntrie~’ eoonamies, whidr seriously affects ?he future development of the
countries and jeopardizes the interests of peace in this area of tie watld and in
the entire world.
When it was Chairman of the mvement of Non-Aligned Countries, Cuba decided, .
in Hay of 1980, to offer to mdiate in order to try to a?‘oid the conflict that
seemed to be looming iu view of the steady deterioratitm in relatims between the
two oomtries and of the beginning of wilitary aotivities alaag the bordere. oily
a few months later, imnediatsly after the war began, our aouuuy antinued to put
forward its pasea efforts, together with other metiers of the Movement. It was our
COnVictiar, and it centinugs to bj so, that it is for the nan-aligned oouutries to
strengthen tbeit tz&esiveneee and solidarity and redouble their efforts for pea-#
for a new, just, esmosic cedar and for an appropriate eolutim e0 the pr&lenrs
that are weighing heavily on our pa~ples.
The war between Iran and Iraq has not anly caused bloodshed in these two
Statee melPbers of our Movement, but if3 ale0 preventing them from fulfilling their
human and eamomic potential in the interest of theft peoplee and in the interest
of the just cause8 in which we are all ifWOlved0
(ME. Velazco San JoQe, Cuba)
A short time a+, attending the summit cmference in Harare, we heard the
Overwhelming ~jority of the Heads of State and mvermnt pleading for a ceseatia
of the war and for a pemaeful and honourable solution. Just 8 few step8 away from
th iI Council Chder , in the Csneral msembly, the same heartfelt appeals can be
heard. It can be said that the arvertielming mjority of mankind is earnestly
calling for a ceoe;rtiar of the war between Itan and Iraq and haa urged that there
be no more bloodshed among the son8 of those oolmtf ice and that peace reign in this
nerve-centre of the world.
It iS tiW for a ceseatfcm of the hastilitiee, tfme for a just ad haourable
peace to replace the sound of gum and put an end to the loee of human life. We
must all make an effort to bring about a cessation of the conflict and to try to
find a my to pat an end to the hastilities.
Our aountry ha8 excellent relatima wit& both parties to the conflict and we
ace dietreeaed and disppay5d at the sacrifice in this wol of the fineM youg pple
in Iran and Iraq, not (b we like to see the continuatim and exteneim of this
ccmflict offering the imperialists an excuse to intervene with their fczcee ar:d to
strengthen a presence which no one wants and whidr will mly prove to be
~uiuiental to the people of the region.
(Hr. VelaZCO San Jose, Cuba)
The voice of reason must hold sway over the voice of Wara
The interests of the peoples of Iran and Iraq, end those of the peoples of
Palestine and of the region as a whole, must take precedence over any other kind of
considerat ion.
In conclusion, I should like to mote the words of the President of the
Council of State and of the council of Ministers of Cuba, Comrade Fidel Castro, in
the recently concluded eighth summit Conference of Non-Aligned Countries in Rararer
*The war between Iran and Iraq, two Member States of our Movement, should
never have broken out. Unfortunately, all efforts to find a solution to this
difficult and complex conflict have been in vain, but this met not lead us to
falter in our efforts to find peace and to do what we can to repair the damage .
and bind the wounds resulting from this fratricidal conflict.’
That is Cuba’s position. We will never falter in this task, which IS also the
task of the whole Non-Aligned Movement , as long ae there is a chance to help to
restore peace between Iran and Iras.
The PRESIUENP (interpretation from Arabic): I thank the representative
of Cuba for the kind words he addreased to me.
The next speaker is the representative of Mexico. I invite him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his statement-
Mr. MAYA PALEBKXA (Mexico) (interpretation from Spanish): Mr. President,
firet I should like to express to you the pleaeure of my delegation at seeing you
preside over the Security Council this month, in view of your well-known diplomatic
skille. We are also pleased to pay a tribute to your predecessor, the Permanent
Representative of the soviet Union, for the manner in which he conducted the
proceedings in the Council last month.
The President of Mexico, President de la Madrid, addressing the General
Assembly on 24 September last, stated:
(Mr. Ebya Palencia , Mexico)
‘The prevention of nuclear uar ia linked to the solution of c~@~fliCtS
affecting the balance of power. In various geographical areas the exercise of
force and intolerance hinder &ances for conciliation.” (A/4l/PV.B, PO 12)
After referring at length tD the crisis in Central -erica, he added:
%a stand for negotiated solutions to carflicte not only in the region
which is CLCmmt to us but also in other areas, whether in the South Atlantic,
southern Africa, the Middle East, the Mediterranean a South-East Asia. we
are convinced that, with an imaginative and constructive approach,
opportmities foe mderstanding uan be found in each of these placesoD
(ibid., m. N-20)
It is in this epir it that wy delegntian ha8 asked to apsak, without the right
to vote, at thio mesting in accardance with the prcuLeions of Article 31 of the
Chartar of the Security Council dealing with the situation between Iran and Iraq.
We consider that all regional oonfliots and threat6 ox the use of force, as well as
all fblrms Of interventicm, jeopardize the security not only of neighbouring
countries but aleo ultimately jeopacdize the secL:ity of all Maiaber Stetef3. There
18 no other Uay to uonstcue the essential parpose of the United mtims as sumed
up in Article 1, paeagraph 1 of the Charter , idhh is to maintein Intemati~al
maoe and seuur i(U, and, to that end: to take effective collective meamres, in
c~forrpity with htetMti=1 law.
At its meeting QL 24 Pebruary 1986, the @curity Council examined in detail
the queatiar which hae >w been befae us fa more aan six years as a result Of
the COnflict b.sWeen Iran and Iraq - both abuntries with vhf& we have cordial
diplomtic relations - rlhich hae caused heavy lo88 of life and considerable
mater ial darnege, an3 which ie endangering that internatiarel peaoe and security.
The Council recalled the prwisions of the Charter, and in particular the
obligatiar of all Metier Statts bo settle their internatimal diepues by peaceful
(Hr. Uoya Palencia, Mexico)
meana* elnphasiaing the principle of the inadmieeibility of the acsuisition of
territory by force; it alao took note of the praiseworthy madiation efforts being
made in this case by the Secretary-General.
Having considered the aituation once again today, Mexico conaiders it
appropriate, in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter, and
with the unbroken peace-loving traditions of our people and Government, to appeal’
to both earties to the conflict to collply fully and without delay with all the
Provisimns of resolution 582 (1986), adopted by the Council on 24 Pebruety of this
year, not only to achieve a lasting peace between the parties to the conflict, but
alsO by 80 doing to contribute to the peace end security of mankind as a whole.
The geographical and cultural affinities that have linked Iran and Iraq
throughout their history, and the desire of their peoples to live in peace and
achieve a prosperoue development, should, in the opinion of my delegation, override
any other peripheral considerations , a8 well as the origins and came6 of the
conflict, so that it can be eettled peacefully and with honour a8 6oon as possible.
The hietory of both theee Member State8 and the conflict with which we are
dealing here certainly did not begin with thie war@ and it will certainly not end
with it. That history ehould be extended in the future on the baais of mutual
understanding and coexistence in accordance with international law and with due
regard for their respective values. Thus Mexico today joins the appeal made by a
majority of Member States that Iran and Iraq ehould immediately implement Security
Council reeolution 562 (1986), to which I have referred, and that the
Secretary-General should inteneify his efforts to pereuade both partiee to
establish a laeting peace which would be of benefit to one and all and would
Uemonstrate the deelre of both aide6 to promote the development of their people8 by
putting an end to thie long and distressing conflict.
The PRpSIDm (interpcetatian from Arabic): I thank the representative
of btaxico fox hia kind word5 addeeeeed to ms-
The next spaaker is Me representative of Bulgaria. I invite him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his statement-
Mr. TSVIWKOV (Bulgaria) (interpretation from French); Mr. President, I
take great pleaeure in ccmgratulating you, on behalf of the Bulgarian delegation
and QL my own behalf, on your assumption of t4e presidency of t4e Security Council
for the malt4 of uctaber. Aware as we are of your wealt4 of diplormtic experience
and political wisdom, we are confident t4at you will successfully carry out the
rgsponeibilities entrusted i.you thier~mth.
Ch behalf of ny delegation, I should like to take this opportunity to thank
Aa&msador BelumgW, the Permmar.t Rspreaanntetive of the Soviet mian, for the
4isb degree of skill and effectiveness wit4 which he guided the meetings of We
COUIIC~~ awing the leonth of septe*sr.
(Ht. Tevetkcw , Bulgat ia)
I have listened closely to tie speakers rho preceded me. Their legitimate
concern about the conflict bebween Iran and Iraq, which has been going cm for mote
than six years, is me t&hi~ ve entirely share, as it is shred by the
intirnatiaral ~)munlty, and that is borne out by the urgent convming of the
colmcil. This has been a lang war and a bloody me0 which has brought ally
suffering and incalmlable losses to the peoples of those two countries and to
those in that part of the world and Rich, furthermore, has pawed to be a
dangerous destabilising faclmt in an already explosive area, a war which seoiously
endangers internatiaral peace and security. Its escalatia, can arly serve the
nattcw interests of thase who take the liberty of proclaiming this part of the
world %n area of their vi-1 intetei3ts”.
The Bulgarian delegation consequently joins in the urgent appeals mada by 811
previous speakers that an hnediate end be put to this senseless conflict and that
it be resolved by peaceful means# particularly sinin a complex and tense
lnternatiaral atmoeghete any local carflict has inherent in it the teal risk of
leading eo a major aonftartatiar, even a glabal one.
The facts make it necessary for a new apptoacii to be taken to the problems of
WaL and pea-, the pr&lems of national and intetnatiaral recut ity. That approach
is are tiich should UWXI and for all rule out war ftcun the life of mankind, an
approach based fitet of all Q) an end to the arms race and the peaceful settlement
of disputes.
The People’s Regtblic of Bulgaria hae always follaved the principle that
States should avoid resorting to force or the threat of force in resolving theft
contrwersies and dieputes. These ptableme should be settled around the
negotiating table, with full respect for the h%perrdence, sovereignty and
legitimate interests of the States cmcerned, without any foreign inter been-. ‘k,
(Mr. lWetkav, Bulgaria)
bring that about it is essential also that all the States involved and the entice
international oemmu?ity play their collective part.
That approach was ccmf ir& awe agair in the camamiq~ ieaued following the
meting of the Political Carsultative Cmittee of the States Msrkkrs of the Warsaw
Treaty held last Jme in Budapest:
“It is only through political means and by collective en&avouro on the
part of all States that it will be possible to guarantee all peoples and
COUntrieS security and conditiars of peaoe for their developPent and their
progress. ”
Alrthermore, that requirenent ie one of the fundmkmtal principles of the
Charter, which enjoins upon all nations the duty to settle their disputes by
peaceful means and to avoid endangering internatimal paaae and security. It
should also be tecatled tbet solving internatiaral disgrtes is are of the
fundamental elements of the general systetm of international securf~, the creation
of &icb will be discussed at the forty-first session of the General Assembly on a
proposal mads by the socialist oountries, including the People’s Republic of
Bulgaria.
All this is fully germane to the present oonfliot beween Iran and Iraq. The
position of Bulgaria on this, a positian temtedly put farward, ha8 not changed
singe this armd conflict first broke out. The People’s Rsplblic of Bulgaria has
always joined in any appeal for the immediate cessation of haetilities so that this
aonfliet can be brought to an end in an hcmourable way@ through peaceful means, in
accordance with the Charter of the mited Nations and the resolutions Of the
seeur ity Comcil.
This positian is a reflectiof ouz oometn at the eontinuatim of the
akmcuaral and dangerous situaticm prevailing in that part of the world aa veil a6
OUI anxiety to see an end to this uselee bloo&hed. Bulgaria, vhid, ~~~intxaina
(Mr. 33svetkov, Bulgat ie)
friendly telatiohu, ‘bogether with nutuelly a&antageoUg oo*petatlmr with both
parties has extremely warm feelings towards both those peoples. In the hope that
they will shortly be liberated fran the horrors of war , we are prepared to make our
full amtribution in order to bring about the cessatiar of this armed conflict and
a just and caupxehehsive solutim to the dispute between Iran and Iraq within the
framawork of the ulited Nations. My country has never failed to give it8 support
to the mediation efforts of the thited l?atiom &cretary-general and Other
amstructive efforta made internaticmally to being about a political settleumnt to
the carflict.
The role of the Securiw Couacil in this regard is extremely important.
In carclusioh may I exprees the hope, on behalf of my delegatfan, that through
enag6tiC and constiuctive efforta the wrld oonaumity will be equal to the
requirementsof our day andwilldo everything it can to bring about a just and
Usting eettlement to the conflict bebeen Iran ad xraq, in th& fn&rnatitXbal
Year of Peace &ich it has proclaimed, 80 that the way can be paved to a better and
nose eecuc e uor 18.
The PRESIDE (interpretation from Arabic): I thank the repesentatfve
of 8ulgaria for the kind worib he addressed to me*
The next epakee inscribed ca my list is the Minister of EWeign Affairs and
Co~pero tion of Chad. I welcome Bis Excellency and iuvite him to take a seat et
the Council table and to make his etitement.
Mr. IA88OU (Chad) (interpretation from Premh)r Piret may I thauk yrou,
Mr. President, and other me&eze of the Council for allowing me to participate in
this debate <111 a matter which ie a major wnmrn of the iuterhational m,amuhity .
I &ould like to take this oppartmity ta congratulate yau, Sir, on your
acxeesim W the presidency of the Security Council for this munth. k.3 are
(Mr. Lmseou, Chad)
particularly satisfied at meeing the representative of l fricmlly corntry *am9
diplatfc acwmn, tact and far-eightodnus are ~11 kamm to all. Thae qwlrtiee
augur well for the BuaceBB of our future work. I should aleo like to exprere ay
gratibde to MC. Alexandar Relanogov for the admir&le way in whi& he conducted
the work of the Cotnoil during September, a mnth marked by the triggering off of
teroori8t attach. Unfwtunately, it io once again violena, that oordid
inrrtruaent for settling disputes, tJhi& is the oubject of our preeent debates.
For nix yeam nowI a murderous umfliat hae plunged into mourning two
fraternal cotmtries, me&mrs of the gre3t family of the Islapric Cmferenat. In
that eenoeleee war, a heavy pr ioe haa been paid by both al&a, m8ter ially and in
human term.
(Mr. Lasaou, Chad)
The disturbing dimensions that the conflict is now aW55ing presolt the
ineXOKable K isk of ite spreading throughout the QJlf regiQ1, implying a grave
threat to international peace and security. w-strategic interests have already
turned the arm intO a veritable powderkeg.
The Recur iw Council, which has had this worrying mtter before it since 1980,
has considered all aspcts of the cmflict on a nu&er of occ(~~ions. The elements
of a Conprehensive solution were clearly set out in resolutiar 514 (1982), of
2 July 1982. Since then they have been regularly repted.
Unfortunately, the voios of reason and xo&raticn has not been heeded, thus
prwaking, it appeara, the exact opposite - a new flare-up of viOleiW0.
Last February the international ananunity follawed with deep anxiety the major
offensive laun&ed by the Islamic forces of Iran against Iraq% very f3WmeigntYr
the objective being to oocupy certain part5 of that country% territory.
By adopting resolution 582 (1986), of 24 February 1986, the &cutity Council
laid the foundaticms for a just and lasting solution tu the Iran-Iraq oanflict.
President &dd(irp Hussein edbpted a padtim -plying with that resolution, which
Iasant co-operating by all means possible with the Security Council to achieve a
Se propmed a general, ccrpplete and wconditianal withdreual * canprehensive peaoe.
to the internationally reaognized boun&r iesi a general ad m@eb ex&age of
prisanete$ the signing of a peace and nonaggressim pact between the WO
Countries3 and nar-intervention in eacdr other’s inwrnal affairs, with es& muntry
respecting the other’s choice of ita own path. My delegation believes that thkape
are elements of a constructive attitude, consistent witpL the norms of internstiara
Hcn+eveK, ray clelegatian is mncerned that that good-will gesture has received
no favourable respmme fK0m the Iranian side, which, morewer, states that Iran
will not extend its hand again tr3 the people of It2xi until thase people are
(Mt. Ummu, Chad)
freed from the grip of Saddam Hussein. That blatant, stubborn dieregard of the
decieicsne oil the international mlrmuniw haa the potential for an escalation with
Chad, which haa known the hccmre of a war imposed cm it by the expansionist
Tripoli rdgima, ie well phced to understand the serioueneso of such a turn of
eventi. That is why we firmly support Presilient Saddam Hussein*8 paace initiative.
The Counsil at. 1U present meetings should a&pt appopriste measures
con&cive to ensuring the unumdttioral implementstim of resoluticm 582 (1966).
mly paeftive stepe and the aosperation of both parties can make possible an end
to that futile amflict and ~11~ the two countries to devote themselves to a mere
constructive task - the rebuilding of theit devastated ecanamies. Wa make that
appeal cn behalf of the suffering peoplea of Iran and Iraq.
The PRESITHNT (interpretation Pram Ar&ia)t I thank the mlifater foe
POreign Mfake and Co-aparatitm of Chad for his kind worde adtkeesed to am.
There are no further speakers for thie meeting. The next meeting of the
Semrity Council to continue csonsiderstiar of the item cn the agen& vi?.1 be held
tomorrow at 3.30 p-m.
The meeting taee at 5.35 p.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.2711.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-2711/. Accessed .