S/PV.2883 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
2
Speeches
0
Countries
2
Resolutions
Resolutions:
641 (1989),
S/RES/641(1989)
Topics
Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Diplomatic expressions and remarks
War and military aggression
Arab political groupings
Peace processes and negotiations
General statements and positions
The Security Council will now begin its consideration of
the item on its agenda.
The Security Council is meeting in rkponse to the request contained in a
letter dated 29 August 1989 from the Charge d'affaires ad.interim of the Permanent
Mission.of Qatar to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security
Council, document S/20817-
Members of the Council have before them the text of a draft resolution
submitted by Algeria, Colombia, Ethiopia, Malaysia, Nepal, Senegal and Yugoslavia,
contained in document S/20820.
I should like to draw the attention of members of the Council to document
S/20816, which contains the text of a letter dated 28 August 1989 from the Chargd
d'affaires ad interim of the Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United
Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. .'
Members of the Council have also received photocopies of a letter dated
29 August 1989 from the Charge d'affaires ad interim of the Permanent Mission Of
Lebanon to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, which will be
published as a document of the Security Council undes the symbol S/20822 at 0600 . hours tomorrow.
The representative of Israel has asked to speak on this item. .I invite him to
take a place at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. BEIN (Israel): At the outset, Sir, I congratulate you on your
assumption of the presidency of the Security Council for the month of August. I
also congratulate the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia on the way in which he
conducted the affairs of the Security Council last month.
(Mr; Be in, Israel)
I have just returned from a brief stay in Israel. MY observations there
reaffirmed my conviction that a better future for our region is indeed possible. I
saw a people yearning for peace , a people whose long-standing aspiration for
coexistence and tolerance is evident in every conversation.
While stubborn hope prevails, it is being tested severely by the daily
violence with which our country is confronted. I saw a society anguished by
escalating violence, marked by daily kidnappings , assaults and murders of Jews and
Arabs alike.
(Mr;-Rein;Israel)
Just last week we were all riveted by the rapid unfolding of the kidnapping
episode of an Israeli jeweller who was later found alive at the bottom of a
twenty-foot well. That same day, a civilian bus, dodging Arab stone throwers,
veered into the opposite lane and collided head on with a private car, killing a
mother and her three children.
The cumulative effect of the violence finds expression in Israel's'newspapers,
where severe disillusionment is being voiced as to the prospects of peace@
particularly as the results of the Fifth Fatah Congress became known. No Israeli
could remain unperturbed by such resolutions as the call for "continuing to
intensify and escalate armed action and all forms of struggle to liquidate the
Israeli-Zionist occupation of our occupied Palestinian land". The consensus, even
in liberal circles, held that Fatah had, I would sayI 'brought a caduc to the
caduc". Yet, our hope prevails.
Indicative of this hope is our adamant determination to pursue the dialogue
with local Palestinian leaders,.a dialogue which, despite the best efforts of the
PI-0, continues unabated. Thus, Israel's Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Minister
for Foreign Affairs Moshe Arens and Defence Minister Yitzhak Rabin, among others,
continue to hold extensive talks with leaders from all elements of Palestinian
society. The purpose of these meetings is to reach an agreement as to the
modalities and process of holding free and democratic elections in the territories
as a stepping-stone to a comprehensive peace.
Those countries that repeatedly convene the Security Council in order to
condemn Israel only pretend to do so in order to protect the Palestinians, for if
they really did care they would add their voices in support of the peace process
instead of fruitlessly convening the Council on a monthly basis. Yet, theirs is
not the lot of the victim; those who really suffer from this hypocritical game are
my people, and the Palestinians.
(Mt;.Sein;-Israel)
Brutal acts of violence have been escalating rapidly in recent months, with
over half of all terrorist assaults aimed at the local Palestinian population. In
fact, many more Palestinians have been the casualties of PLO violence than
Israelis. Over 100 Palestinians in the territories have been murdered by various
Pfx) groups since the beginning of 1988. Following the promulgation of Israel's
peace initiative in April 1989, the rate of PLO-directed attacks against
Palestinians began to increase sharply. Close to 50 were slain in the last two
months alone.
AS should be obvious, this drastic increase in violence is the PLo"s direct
response to the challenge posed by Israel's April 1989 peace initiative. The
violence is intended to intimidate the local population and ensure absolute PLO
domination. The means used in this campaign have been unusually brutal. The
victim is usually kidnapped, interrogated, tortured and, finally, executed by being
beaten, stabbed or axed to death. Public hangings are also frequent, including the
hanging of teachers in school yards, in front of terrified children.
Asked on 22 August 1989 whether the PLO condoned such attacks, Arafat answered
by asking the correspondent, "Are you against it?" This was a chilling reminder of
the by-now famous warning issued by Arafat on 19 January 19898 "Whoever thinks of
stopping the uprising before it achieves its goals, 5 will give him 10 bullets in
the chest." Meanwhile, as the PLO attempts to achieve its goals, people are being
killed.
It is on Israel, however, that international law places the responsibility to
maintain public order and safety in the administered territories, pending a final
negotiated agreement on their status. Public safety is indeed being maintained in
the face of flagrant incitement emanating from the Arab world. Yet, we are
repeatedly condemned by the Security Council. However, the interesting question
is: Why has the widespread violence which has necessitated our measures never been
(Mr. Bein;Israel)
addressed by this body? The context has never been considered'nor has an appeal .
for mutual restraint ever been raised.
AS to the substance of the‘issue, Israel maintains that, in view of the sui
generis status of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza District, the de'iure applicability
of the Fourth Geneva Convention to these areas is doubtful. Yet, Israel prefers to
set aside the legal question of the status of these areas, and has decided to act
de facto in accordance with the humanitarian provisions of that Convention.
Israel has accordingly acted with utmost restraint within the'confines of
local and international law. Not only that, but we have determined not to utilize
the death penalty expressly contemplated by the Fourth Geneva Convention. Israel
has preferred instead to exercise less severe measures derived from the local.law
applicable in the territories in conformity with the requirements of international
law. This law of the land has been in force since the British, and subsequent
Jordanian and Egyptian, rule over these territories, and it permits the expulsion
of individuals who pose an immediate and grave threat to security and public safety.
Since Israel regards expulsions as its most severe measure, the decision to
banish individuals is not taken arbitrarily or lightly. On the contrary, this
measure is taken only after the most careful consideration and upon the conclusion
that all other means have failed in curbing the violence.and preventing grave risks
to public safety. It is an exceptional step whose recourse is a means of last
resort. Each of the individuals had exhaustive legal remedies available to him.
Each of them appealed before Israel's Supreme Court , a lengthy legal proceeding
which lasted nearly a year.
I As regards the question of international law, Israel's Supreme Court has
examined repeatedly the proper interpretation and'application of Article 49 of the
i Fourth Geneva Convention. The Court held that, while mass deportations are
! prohibited.under Article 49; the expulsion 'of individuals is allowed.
. (Mr. Bein, Israel)
Israel is a State dedicated to the rule of law, which is guaranteed by an
independent judiciary. Our courts and our judicial system as a whole have
established for themselves an undisputed reputation. They certainly can match, and . in many cases can better, the courts in most countries.
An unfortunate, but all-too-obvious conclusion , emerges from a comparison of
the quick action taken by the Security Council today and the absolute inability of
the Council to respond in an effective manner to the indiscriminate slaughter
Perpetrated by Syria and its proxies in Lebanon.
Only two weeks ago the Secretary-General exerted a major effort to convene the
Security Council in order to respond to the massive carnage in Lebanon. His
and effectively by a few members of the.
commendable efforts were rebuffed neatly
superseded the threat to international
Council whose ulterior motives evidently
peace and security.
(Mt. Bein, ,Israel)
Thus one of the most volatile international crises of our time, involving the
occupation of two thirds of Lebanon by 40,000 Syrian troops, the savage bombardment
of Beirut, which resulted in hundreds of thousands of refugees and nearly 1,000
deaths, was neglected. The heightened global tensions-were disregarded. Instead
of conducting a formal debate, the Security Council was made to settle for a
diluted presidential statement which was barely allowed to express "great disquiet"
over the slaughter. Needless to say, neglected to be mentioned was Syria's direct
responsibility for the slaughter.
The conclusion is clear. The agenda of the Security Council is dictated
today, as it was two weeks ago, by the ulterior motives of certain members.
Primary among them is the obstruction of any genuine prospect for peace between
Israel and those nations still formally in a state of war with it.
Yet we do not despair. We invite the nations of the Middle East to support
the peace initiative and begin the process which we in Israel yearn for= TO
promote this, we call on the Security Council to encourage a fundamental
breakthrough in the current stalemate and help promote movement towards a peaceful
future.'
The PRESIDBN~: It is my understanding that the Council is ready to
proceed to the vote on the draft resolution before it. Unless I hear any
objection, I shall put the draft resolution to the vote. There being no objection,
it is so decided.
I shall first call on those members of the Council who wish to make statements
before the voting.
Mr. PICKERING (United States of America): The Security Council is
convened today to consider a draft resolution by the non-aligned members of the
Security Council. The draft resolution concerns the action by the Government of
Israel on 27 August to deport five Palestinians from the occupied territories.
(Mr; -Pickering; -United.States)
The United States position on this issue is well known. It was reaffirmed by
the Department of State spokesman on 28 August: we are opposed in principle to
deportations as contrary to the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention,
Provisions which apply to the occupied territories of the West Dank and Gaza. We
further believe that deportations are unhelpful because they increase tensions and
corrode the atmosphere in the region , making it more difficult for Israelis and
Palestinians to engage in constructive dialogue and thereby move the peace process
forward. We have repeatedly made these views known to.the Government of Israel.
In its resolution 636 (1989), adopted on 6 July, the Security Council
expressed its deep regret at continuing deportations and called on Israel to desist
from further deportations of Palestinian civilians. Despite this call by the
COUnCi.1, Israel has proceeded less than ‘two months later with the deportation of
five additional Palestinians. It is in this context that my Government will not
oppose the draft resolution before the Council, but will abstain.
The United States wishes to make clear that we do not believe that repeated
resort to the Security Council will help to address the underlying problems of
finding peace or facilitate negotiations between the parties. The difficult
decisions needed to launch a negotiating process are the responsibility of the
parties themselves; others cannot do this for them. The United States is
continuing its active efforts to assist the ,parties in establishing a dialogue that
can lead to interim and final status arrangements in the occupied territories and _
to a comprehensive peace in the region.
For the record I wish to add our oft-stated objection to the phrases appearing
in this draft resolution *occupied Palestinian territories” and “Palestinian
territories, occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem, and the other
occupied Arab territories”. We consider that these phrases describe the
territories demographically, are limited to territories occupied in 1967, and do
(Mr. .Picket$ng;.United,States)
not prejudge their status , which can only be resolved through negotiati0n.s. We are
convinced that Jerusalem must remain undivided, but that its final status should be
decided through negotiations.
I shall now put the draft resolution to the vote.
A vote.was,taken.by.show.of hands.
In. favour t Algeria, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Ethiopia, Finland,
France, Malaysia, Nepal, Senegal, Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
Yugoslavia
Against: None
Abstaining: United States of America-
The’.PF&I&NTt The result of the voting is as follows: 14 votes in
favour, none against, and one abstention. The draft resolution has been adopted as
resolution 641 (1989) .
The representative of Palestine wishes to speak. I call upon him.
Mr; .MANSOUR (Palestine) (interpretation from Arabic) t At the outset I ~
should like to convey to you our great pleasure an,d pride at seeing youI with your
well known diplomatic and political experience, presiding over the deliberations of
the Council for this month. The bonds that link our countries, Governments and
peoples go beyond our belonging to the same nations the Arab nation. The
struggling people of Palestine, the people under Israeli occupation in the ‘-
intifadah, continue to draw inspiration from the revolution of the 1.5 million
martyrs of Algeria, which gives us reason to continue to struggle until we achieve
our oyective of returning home, the liberation of our territories, and the
-establishment of our independent Palestinian State in our occupied Palestinian
territories.
(Mr. Mansour; Palestine)
r
I should like to express our thanks to those States that voted in favour Of .
Our participation in this meeting /and on behalf of our Palestinian people and of
the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, which has the
authority and functions of the provisional Government of the State of Palestine
until the Government is ,formed, I should like to thank all those States that voted
for the draft resolution just adopted, resolution 641 (1989).
I should like in particular to.thank the non-aligned caucus for sponsoring the
draft resolution and for its effort to make our endeavours successful.
To the Security Council in particular and to the United Nations in general, as
well as to the Secretary-General, Mr. Javier Perez de Cuellar, we express
appreciation and respect. We continue to hope that, under the supervision of the
United Nations, we shall all be able to initiate the preparationsfor the
International Peace Conference and its convening in accordance with resolutions of
the United Nations, in particular resolution 43/176.
(Mr; .Mansour;.Palestine)
Our people, the people of the intifadah, and its leadership, the PLO, continue
to stretch out their hands to all those who are.willing and able to contribute to
the process of building peace based on justice.
If; however, this historic opportunity for peace is lost, responsibility will
lie with those who continue to push us towards the.option of war and destruction,
those who torture and maim our people - especially our people under occupation -
with those who flout the resolutions of the Security Council and the provisions Of
the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. It is they and their supporters who will be
to blame,
Finally, from this Chamber we send to our struggling, steadfast people in the
occupied territories, a message of our pride in them, their struggle and their
sacrifice: The day of victory is coming; the inevitable end to the nightmare of
Israeli occupation is not far off.
The'PRESIDENT (interpretation from Arabic) L I thank the representative
of Palestine for his kind words addressed to me and to my country.
(spoke-in.English)
There are no further speakers on my list. The Security Council has thus
concluded the present stage of its consideration of the item on its agenda.
The.meeting.rose.at-S;lO.p;m. The.meeting.rose.at-S;lO.p;m.
Vote:
641 (1989)
Consensus
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.2883.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-2883/. Accessed .