S/PV.3238 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
5
Speeches
0
Countries
2
Resolutions
Resolutions:
S/25958,
S/RES/841(1993)
Topics
Security Council deliberations
Arab political groupings
UN procedural rules
Peace processes and negotiations
War and military aggression
Haiti elections and governance
I should like to
inform the Council that I have received letters from the representatives of
the Bahamas, Canada and Haiti in which they request to be invited to
participate in the discussion of the item on the Council's agenda. In
conformity with the usual practice, I propose, with the consent of the
Council, to invite those representatives to participate in the discussion
without the right to vote, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the
Charter and rule 37 of the Council's provisional rules of procedure.
There being no objection, it is so decided.
At the invitation of the President, Mr. Longcham Haiti) took a place at
the Council table; Mr. Moultrie (Bahamas) and Mrs. Fréchette (Canada) took the
places reserved for them at the side of the Council Chamber.
Vote:
S/RES/841(1993)
Recorded Vote
✓ 15
✗ 0
0 abs.
The Security Council
will now begin its consideration of the item on its agenda. The Council is
meeting in accordance with the understanding reached in its prior
consultations.
(The President)
Members of the Council have before them document S/25958, which contains
the text of a letter dated 7 June 1993, from the Permanent Representative of
Haiti to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council.
Members of the Council also have before them document 8/25957, which
contains the text of a draft resolution submitted by France, the United States
of America and Venezuela.
I should like to draw the attention of the members of the Council to
document S/25942, which contains the text of a letter dated 14 June 1993 from
the Permanent Representative of Cuba to the United Nations addressed to the
President of the Security Council,
The first speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of Canada.
I invite her to take a place at the Council table and to make her statement.
Mrs. FRECHETTE (Canada): Allow me at the outset, Mr. President, to
extend to you the congratulations of my delegation on your assumption of the
presidency for the month of June. I am sure that you will exercise these
important responsibilities with great distinction. I should also like to
congratulate and thank the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation,
whose tenure in the Chair of the Council last month is unanimously agreed to
have been of exceptional quality.
Canada has asked to speak during this debate to express its strong
support for the draft resolution the Council is preparing to adopt.
(spoke in French)
The forcible overthrow of the democratically elected Government of
President Jean-Bertrand Aristide has been universally condemned by the
international community. The resolution adopted by the General Assembly on
11 October 1991, and those which followed, demand the restoration of
constitutional order in Haiti and the return of President Aristide.
The return of democracy to Haiti has been a priority of the Government of
Canada since the crisis began more than 18 months ago. We believe that the
draft resolution before the Council is a critical step towards achieving our
common objective.
From the outset, it has seemed clear to us that only a firm and
unequivocal response from the international community would produce the
conditions necessary for the return of democracy to Haiti. Canada supported
unreservedly the initiative taken by the Organization of American States (OAS)
not only to condemn the interruption of the democratic process but also to
implement concrete measures designed to restore that process.
The OAS has demonstrated patience and resolve, and has not been deflected
from its objective when confronted with the intransigence of the illegal
(Mrs. Fréchette, Canada)
regime. However, it must be recognized that there are limits to the tools
available to the OAS. The OAS embargo on trade with Haiti is not binding on
countries which are not members of that organization, thus reducing its impact
and thereby allowing the illegal regime in Port-au-Prince to cling to power.
Acknowledging this reality, the OAS found it necessary to seek the support of
the United Nations.
Canada strongly supports the efforts of the past six months of
His Excellency Mr. Dante Caputo, Special Envoy of the OAS and the United
Nations, to reach a negotiated settlement. We salute the courage, patience
and skill with which he has carried out his mandate. However, the negotiating
process Mr. Caputo has undertaken was rejected by the de facto authorities and
the military command in Haiti when they refused to endorse key elements of his
proposed framework for a settlement.
We share a responsibility to create the conditions necessary to the
success of Mr. Caputo's mission of mediation on behalf of the United Nations
and the OAS. By supporting the limited sanctions in the draft resolution, the
purpose of which is to advance the negotiating process, we will send a clear
message.
Repression prevails in Haiti. Fundamental human rights are
systematically violated. The situation is one of instability, where political
choice is exercised only in the dangerous act of seeking refuge elsewhere. We
should remember that virtually no Haitians took to the seas after
President Aristide's election, whereas an estimated 40,000 fled the country
after the coup d'état.
The situation in Haiti is a threat to peace and security in the region;
and Haiti's neighbours are daily subjected to the consequences.
(Mrs. Fréchette, Canada)
For these reasons, the Canadian Government considers it legitimate and
necessary that the Council respond positively to the call by
President Aristide, the only legitimate authority of the Haitian nation, and
impose an embargo on the delivery of oil supplies in order to bring about a
speedy conclusion to this tragic and volatile situation. There is no other
way to bring about the end of the illegal regime. It is only by demonstrating
the resolve of the entire international community that those who hold power in
Haiti will understand that there is no other path than the negotiated solution
that is being offered.
The principal elements of this draft resolution ~- an embargo on the
delivery of petroleum and petroleum products, arms and munitions, and the
freezing of the assets of the Haitian State ~ are already covered by the
embargo earlier decreed by the OAS. As such, Canada has been implementing
them for some time, and we look forward to receiving the determined support of
the entire international community.
I thank the
representative of Canada for the kind words she addressed to me.
It is my understanding that the Council is ready to proceed to the vote
on the draft resolution before it. Unless I hear any objection, I shall put
the draft resolution (S/25957) to the vote now.
There being no objection, it is so decided.
A vote was taken by show of hands.
In favour: Brazil, Cape Verde, China, Djibouti, France, Hungary, Japan,
Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Spain,
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
United States of America, Venezuela
There were 15 votes in
favour. The draft resolution has been adopted unanimously as resolution
841 (1993).
Members of the Council have asked me to say that the adoption of this
resolution is warranted by the unique and exceptional situation in Haiti and
should not be regarded as constituting a precedent.
I shall now call on those members of the Council who wish to make
statements following the vcting.
Mr. MERIMEER (France) (interpretation from French): Since the
coup d'état that prompted President Aristide, who was legitimately elected, to
leave his country, France kas been following with special attention the tragic
political events that have occurred in Haiti.
In the hope that the de facto authorities might accept a return to
legality, France also gave unswerving support to the efforts made by the
Special Representative of the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and
the Organization of American States (QAS) to find an honourable solution
enabling Haiti to return frlly to the international community.
We must note here that the reasonable proposals put forward by Mr. Caputo
to resolve the crisis in Haiti have not been heeded by the de facto
government, which for 20 months has opposed any serious settlement of the
question of Haiti.
It is this situation of total blockage that is before the Security
Council for consideration. My delegation hopes that the adoption of sanctions
against Haiti will soon make it possible to bring the perpetrators of the
coup d'état to the negotiating table in order to -estore constitutional order
in Haiti. We also hope that it will not be necessary for the Council to
tighten these measures if, once again, no tangible result emerges from the
(Mr. Mérimée, France)
talks that the Representative of the Secretaries-General wishes to continue to
conduct with the parties.
Mr. ARRIA (Venezuela) (interpretation from Spanish): On
3 October 1991, the Security Council, in this Chamber, received the President
of Haiti, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, whose constitutional Government had just
been overthrown by a military coup d'état. President Aristide at that time
was in danger of losing his life. In spite of the circumstances, no one will
ever forget his statement in the Council. Venezuela's delegation was sitting
at the side of the Security Council. It was a speech with a tone and a
purpose which showed determination to restore peace by peaceful means. I
would recall here some of the aspects of that speech:
| "It is that people which, using non-violent means to protest that
dictatorship, is standing and awaiting the sypport of the international
community - your support - so that together we can show our will to live
in democracy and for democracy and against dictatorship.
"It is the selfsame people that expects the Council's support in the
protection of human rights. (...)
“Were we isolated and alone in our country, it would have been very
difficult for us, the Haitian people, to face this tragic situation, in
which arms and military boots are always ready to crush a people that
wish to stake their lives and work peacefully for the reign of democracy."
(Mr. Arria, Venezuela)
President Aristide then said:
"I shall simply say that with the Council standing with us, we are
firmly convinced that once again the Latin American continent, the
Antilles, the Caribbean and the rest of the world will say ‘yes' to
democracy and ‘no’ to military dictatorship, ‘yes' to solidarity and 'no'
to isolation.
"The Council knows the history of our country, and we are ready to
keep that history going - a history that is replete with struggles for
peace, for justice, for solidarity with the international community."
President Aristide went on to say!
"As I speak to the Council, I see peace-loving people I have known
go before my mind's eye, and I know that they have died. JI am wondering
how many more will be massacred if once and for all an end is not put -
within the norm - to this attempt to murder democracy."
(S/PV.3011,. pp. 7-8)
Throughout the 20 difficult months that have passed since
President Aristide made that speech, he has never abandoned his commitment to
peace. He has constantly cooperated with all the efforts and initiatives of
both the Organization of American States (OAS) and our Organization, This
position has encouraged the Secretary-General's group of friendly countries -
Canada, the United States and France - as well as my own country to continue
to support the process to vestore democracy, stability and peace in Haiti.
The Haitian tragedy is a potential threat to regional and international
peace and security. One need only imagine what a substantial increase of
hundreds of thousands of Haitians, in terrified flight to other countries,
would mean. This tragedy is not confined within the borders of Haiti. It has
(Mr. Arria, Venezuela)
already extended dangerously beyond them. The situation in Haiti is
undoubtedly a threat to peace and security, particularly in the Caribbean
basin, an area to which my country belongs. It is not a question of
interference in Haiti's internal affairs. The legitimate and constitutional
Government of Haiti - the Government of Jean-Bertrand Aristide - has asked us
to act today in the Security Council.
When my country was fighting for its independence in the early nineteenth
century, our liberator Simon Bolivar found support for his actions to win
independence for Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia only in the
small island of Haiti, where he was generously greeted by
President Alexandre Petion, who felt and measured perfectly the need for
solidarity if the South American nations were to win their freedom. We
recognize this debt of ours to Haiti as unpayable, but it is also
unforgettable and we will never abandon it.
There is no reason that Haiti - the first country of our continent, after
the United States, to find independence and freedom, and the first in the
world to abolish slavery - should today find its leaders in exile and its
people forced to flee violations of human rights committed by, usurpers who do
not recognize the most fundamental human rights. In Haiti, the United Nations
believed that, in order to make democracy viable, it was enough to establish
an electoral process. Of course, I do not wish to play down the importance of
that process, but I would like to emphasize that the international community
seemed to exhaust its concern for the people of Haiti after taking what was
only the initial step in a long process of democratization and freedom. The
United Nations opened a new prospect and a new dimension in the life of the
people with the elections in Haiti, but our efforts must not flag until the
(Mr. Arria, Venezuela)
lawful authorities of that country - which has experienced so many violations
of human rights and, I venture to say, such discrimination on the part of the
international community - are restored to power and are accorded the same
consideration and support which the United Nations has shown in other extreme
cases elsewhere in the world.
The human rights situation in Haiti has worsened considerably. People
have disappeared and been killed. There has been preventive repression,
persecution, arbitrary detention and torture. The Special Rapporteur of the
United Nations, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and other
intergovernmental bodies have received innumerable complaints faithfully
documenting these activities. This terrifying reality, existing in our
hemisphere only three hours from New York and Washington, D.C., is being
suffered by Haitians who only appeal for the right to live in freedom and
democracy.
The measures taken in accordance with the resolution of the OAS, imposing
the oil and weapons embargo, are not enough. The provisions of the embargo
have not been respected because they are not binding. The action on which the
Security Council has decided today is unquestionably a sign of the cooperation
between the United Nations and a regional organization, in this case the
Organization of American States. It is also the first time that the Security
Council has adopted a resolution implementing Chapter VII in connection with a
country in the American hemisphere.
It might be appropriate here to recall that the OAS has attempted, since
the beginning of the crisis in Haiti, to apply measures aimed at bringing
about a negotiated settlement. There is no initiative, no mission, no
meeting, no declaration that has not been undertaken within the framework of
(Mr. Arria, Venezuela)
the OAS. Thus, all that remained was recourse to the Security Council, which
we petition today to strengthen the OAS resolution, adopted on 6 June 1993 in
Managua, which emphasizes the need for all States members of the OAS and the
United Nations alike to strengthen the embargo. It is obvious that the only
way to strengthen the embargo is to make it binding and universal. But that
requires action on the part of the Security Council. In this respect, I
should like to emphasize that we are not pursuing the embargo as an end in
itself, but as a means to give the Special Envoy of the Secretaries-General of
both organizations an additional deterrent so that negotiations will continue
and will achieve the goal we all seek.
On this occasion, my delegation would like to express especial
appreciation for the efforts and dedication of the Secretary-—General and in
particular for those of the Special Envoy, Mr. Dante Caputo of Argentina, who
has demonstrated conspicuous dedication in this process.
Finally, I should like to note that the delegations of Brazil and
Venezuela have consulted their regional group and CARICOM, taking into
particular account their observations, which have served to broaden our
position and make the resolution we have adopted today more representative.
It undoubtedly represents a historic attempt to restore democracy, to which
Latin America and the Caribbean are committed.
Mr. KHAN (Pakistan): My delegation voted in favour of resolution
841 (1993) in the belief that the mandatory measures contained in that
resolution are in conformity with the recommendations made by the Organization
of American States (OAS) and that these extraordinary measures by the Security
Council are necessitated by the threat to international peace and security
emanating from the continuation of the existing situation in Haiti.
(Mr. Khan, Pakistan)
We accept the view that the Council's action has been taken under
exceptional circumstances in this particular case. My delegation‘s vote on
this resolution is therefore without prejudice to the position which we may
take on future resolution cf the Council in a similar situation.
My delegation strongly supports the continuing efforts of the
Secretary-General of the Urited Nations, the Secretary-General of the
Organization of American States, their Special Envoy and those of the
international community to reach a political solution to the crisis in Haiti.
It is our earnest expectation that these efforts will culminate in a
comprehensive and peaceful settlement in Haiti in accordance with the
provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law before
the stipulated deadlines, thus obviating the need to impose sanctions.
Mr. SARDENBERG (Brazil): The critical situation in Haiti, a member
of the Latin American and Caribbean family of nations, has increasingly become
a source of sericus concern to Brazil.
Almost three years ago the United Nations and the Organization of
American States (OAS) sponsored a successful electoral process, which resulted
in the election of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the inauguration of
Haiti's legitimate Government, freely and democratically elected.
Like other members of the international community, Brazil welcomed that
achievement, which promised to open a new era in Haiti's history, an era of
economic development and social justice on the basis of democratic
participation. It was therefore a deep disappointment to us when in
September 1991 that democratic process was suddenly and violently interrupted
by a coup d'état. Those deplorable events triggered a strong reaction by the
international community - first and foremost by the Organization of American
States.
In fact, the OAS responded to the Haitian crisis almost immediately,
deciding to take important measures to ensure the restoration of democracy and
of the legitimate Government of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in Haiti. A
series of resolutions adopted by the OAS was supplemented by the strenuous
efforts made since the beginning of the crisis by the Secretary-General of the
OAS, Mr. Joao Clemente Baena Soares. Efforts at the regional level
subsequently received the invaluable support of the United Nations General
Assembly and the equally invaluable participation of the Secretary-General,
Mr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Most recently the designation of Mr. Dante Caputo
as the Special Envoy of the Secretaries-General of both Organizations added an
important contribution to this process. His skilful work is proving
(Mr. Sardenberg, Brazil)
to be an asset in our endeavour to reach a peaceful solution to the crisis in
Haiti.
In spite of ail of the efforts already made, a solution to the crisis has
not yet been achieved. The de facto authorities have repeatediy failed to
accept the fundamental need for a settlement that reinstates the legitimate
Government of Haiti. The resolution adopted by the Foreign Ministers of the
Organization of American States on 6 June in Managua stressed the need for its
member States and the Members of the United Nations to reinforce the measures
adopted to encourage the de facto authorities to accept a prompt solution to
the situation within full respect for legitimacy and democracy.
The resolution just adopted makes it clear that the situation in Haiti is
unique and exceptional. That uniqueness and that exceptional character are
defined by a conjunction of different factors - in particular, the request by
the legitimate Government of Haiti that the Security Council make universal
and mandatory the measures recommended by the OAS. Another crucial factor
that characterizes the uniqueness of the Haitian crisis is the fact that
action has already been taken in that same direction by the OAS and by the
General Assembly. That prior action provides a framework which warrants the
extraordinary consideration of the matter by the Security Council and the
equally extraordinary application of measures provided for in Chapter VII of
the United Nations Charter.
Throughout the consultations the Brazilian delegation worked closely with
the co-sponsors of the draft resolution to support the adoption of the strong
measures that are required and to make sure that the resolution reflected the
specificity of that exceptional framework to which I have referred.
(Mr. Sardenberg, Brazil)
It was, furthermore, important that the resolution be an element in
reinforcing the joint cooperative efforts made by the OAS and the United
Nations in dealing with this most urgent question.
We are thankful to the co-sponsors for having displayed, during all the
consultations, a spirit that is the best reflecticn of the multilateral
approach to international relations and that made it possible to achieve a
resolution that is strong in its content and does not disregard the important
legal and political issues related to the measures adopted.
Twenty months ago the joy and civic spirit with which the Haitian people
embarked upon the democratic process that culminated with the election of
President Aristide were cut short in an untimely way by force of arms. Now
that all Member States of the United Nations are called upon to be party to
the efforts aimed at reversing that situation, it is the hope of the Bragilian
Government that those efforts will finally bear fruit so that Haiti may
recover its legitimate Government and therefore be fully reincorporated into
the international community.
My delegation voted in favour of resolution 841 (1993) in the hope that
it will not have to be applied and that we shall receive notice that the
democratic and peaceful solution has been arrived at, a solution which the
people of Haiti has been expecting for too long.
Mrs. ALBRIGHT (United States of America): The Council has just
acted decisively to underline the international community's demand for a
return to democratic legitimacy in Haiti. In taking the extremely serious
step of imposing mandatory sanctions, we are sending a clear and resounding
message.
It is time for the Haitian parties to engage in honest and serious
negotiations.
(Ms. Albright, United States)
It is time for the Haitian parties to put their country's interests first
and take responsibility for a lasting settlement of this crisis.
It is time to end the suffering of the Haitian people.
It is time for President Aristide and democracy to be returned to this
long-suffering land.
We know that sanctions alone are not a solution to the Haitian tragedy.
Rather, the tough sanctions adopted today represent a further step by the
international community to put pressure on those who stand in the way of a
solution. In the final analysis, however, the international community cannot
solve the Haitian crisis. Only the Haitians themselves can do that.
The negotiating process led by Dante Caputo, the Special Envoy of the
United Nations and Organizeztion of American States Secretaries-General,
presents a historic opportunity for the Haitian parties to provide for a
secure and democratic future,
We call on all sides to seize this opportunity now.
We call on all sides to negotiate seriously for a settlement, and make
the difficult decisions leadership requires.
We call on all sides to take responsibility now for ending this tragedy.
Haiti stands at an important crossroads. The international community,
with this action today, is signalling its commitment to bring a resolution to
the suffering in Haiti. Haitians in leadership positions now must do their
part. We look to them to demonstrate the patriotism and statesmanship their
country requires.
Mr. CHEN Jian (China) (interpretation from Chinese): The Chinese
delegation is deeply concezned over the current situation in Haiti. The
Secretary-General and his Special Envoy as well as the Organization of
American States have all made tireless efforts for a political solution to
(Mr. Chen Jian, China)
the Haitian crisis. We hope that such efforts will facilitate a settlement of
the Haitian question, thus contributing to peace and stability in the region.
The crisis in Haiti is essentially a matter which falls within the
internal affairs of that country, and therefore should be dealt with by the
Haitian people themselves. Meanwhile, it has come to our attention that the
Haitian crisis has acquired a new dimension with the latest developments.
Under these circumstances, the Permanent Representative of Haiti, acting
within the context of the related actions previously taken by the Organization
of American States and by the General Assembly of the United Nations, has
requested the Security Council to take urgent measures to redress the crisis
in Haiti, and his letter has been circulated as an official document of the
Security Council.
As the developments in Haiti have already brought, or will bring, adverse
effects on them, the Organization of American States and countries from Latin
America and the Caribbean have made similar requests to the Security Council
to support the efforts made by the regional Organization. The resolution has
also made it very clear that the Council, in dealing with the Haitian crisis,
will fully heed and respect. the views of the relevant regional Organization
and countries in the region, and that any action by the Council should be
complementary to, and supportive of, the actions by the relevant regional
Organization.
(Mr. Chen Jian, China)
The main purpose of the resolution is an early political solution to the
crisis in Haiti. We have noted, in particular, the statement by the President
of the Council to the effect that the adoption of this resolution and the
measures envisaged therein are warranted only as a result of the unique and
exceptional situation in Haiti, and therefore should not be regarded as
constituting any precedent for the future. It is on the basis of these
considerations that the Chinese delegation has voted in favour of the
resolution just adopted.
The Chinese delegation, as its consistent position, does not favour the
Security Council’s handling matters which are essentially internal affairs of
a Member State, nor does it approve of resorting lightly to such mandatory
measures aS sanctions by the Council. We wish to point out that the
favourable vote the Chinese delegation cast just now does not mean any change
in that position.
There are no further
speakers on my list. The Security Council has thus concluded the present
stage of its consideration of the item on its agenda.
The meeting rose at 7.50 p.m.
Vote:
S/25958
Consensus
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.3238.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-3238/. Accessed .