S/PV.4684Resumption1 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
65
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Security Council deliberations
Peacekeeping support and operations
Conflict-related sexual violence
Women, peace, and security
War and military aggression
General debate rhetoric
Thematic
The President (spoke in French): I should like to
inform the Council that I have received a letter dated
14 January 2003 from the Permanent Observer of
Palestine to the United Nations, which will be issued as
document S/2003/45, and which reads as follows.
"I have the honour to request that, in
accordance with its previous practice, the
Security Council invite the Permanent Observer
of Palestine to the United Nations to participate
in the meeting of the Security Council being held
today, Tuesday, 14 January 2003, on children and
armed conflict."
I propose, with the consent of the Council, to
invite the Permanent Observer of Palestine to
participate in the debate, in accordance with the
Council's provisional rules of procedure and with
previous practice in this regard.
There being no objection, it is so decided.
I invite the Permanent Observer of Palestine to
take the seat reserved for him at the side of the Council
Chamber.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Greece. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Vassilakis (Greece): As this is my first
intervention before the Security Council this year, I
would like to congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption
of the presidency. I would like also to extend my warm
congratulations to the representatives of the new
members of the Council, namely Angola, Chile,
Germany, Pakistan and Spain.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the
European Union. The acceding States - Cyprus, the
Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,
Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia - the countries
of Central and Eastern Europe associated with the
European Union - Bulgaria and Romania - as well
as the European Free Trade Association country of the
European Economic Area Iceland align themselves
with this statement.
It is a cruel fact that armed conflicts affect a large
number of children in many parts of the world. Many
of them are uprooted from their homes, maimed or
killed. Others are orphaned, abused or exploited. Girls
are especially at risk of being subjected to sexual
violence during violent conflicts, including rape and
enslavement. Children are recruited, trained and forced
to kill. Malnutrition among children increases rapidly
because of falling food production and displacement.
Infant and child mortality rates rise dramatically.
Access to schooling is seriously restricted.
This means that the lives of generations of
children growing up in conflict-affected areas are
hampered in a multitude of ways that hinder their
physical, social and emotional growth. We risk losing
generations due to conflict. This is not only a human
tragedy of immense proportions; it is also a tragedy for
the countries concerned. Those children are needed to
ensure the continued development of their countries.
We must face this challenge and ensure that we act as
swiftly as possible.
The European Union was satisfied that Security
Council resolution 1379 (2001) clearly reflected the
Secretary-General's concise report on children and
armed conflict (5/2001/852). The resolution is a
valuable example of Council engagement in enhancing
the rights of the child.
The European Union calls on all parties to armed
conflicts to respect international law relating to the
rights and protection of children. Only by concerted
international efforts can we ensure improved protection
of the rights of the child. We also call on Member
States to put an end to impunity for war crimes and
other serious crimes perpetrated against children.
Last February, the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflict entered into
force. The Optional Protocol constitutes a remarkable
step forward in the international community's efforts to
put an end to the recruitment of children into armed
conflict. The European Union urges States that have
not yet done so to ratify and implement the Optional
Protocol.
Another important step was the inclusion of a
provision in the Statute of the International Criminal
Court classifying the enlistment of children as a war
crime. That covers both the conscription and enlistment
of children under the age of 15 years into any kind of
armed force or group and making them participate
actively in hostilities. We urge all States that have not
yet done so to consider ratifying and fully
implementing the Statute.
At the General Assembly special session on
children, children told us that they wanted us to
implement the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
They are impatient, and for good reason: an enormous
gap exists between the good intentions of international
treaties and the real-life conditions of poverty, neglect
and involvement in armed conflict. Millions of children
worldwide are exploited. In spite of progress in some
areas, much remains to be done.
The European Union will seek in all appropriate
forums to reinforce international action against
recruiting and using children in armed conflict. We will
focus on early warning of violations of children's
rights, but we will also look at improving monitoring
and rehabilitation activities of the United Nations at the
regional, bilateral and local levels. Furthermore, we
will insist on special protection for girls in armed
conflict and on more effective measures to fight
impunity.
The European Union wishes to express its support
for the work of the Office of the Special Representative
for Children and Armed Conflict. The Office has done
impressive work in raising worldwide awareness and
mobilizing official and public support for the
protection of children affected by armed conflict.
We also recognize the importance of the work
carried out by the United Nations Children's Fund, the
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees and the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights. It is also worth
mentioning the United Nations Development Fund for
Women and its report entitled "Women, War and
Peace". It is essential that the endeavours of those
organizations receive adequate support from Member
States - although it still remains the responsibility of
Member States to implement all obligations flowing
from international treaties and instruments.
When discussing last year's resolution, the
European Union welcomed the important tasks set out
for the agencies, funds and programmes of the United
Nations. We believe that the funds and programmes, as
part of their assistance programmes, can contribute
significantly to promoting the rights and the protection
of children, as well as to ensuring the rehabilitation of
children affected by armed conflict.
The needs of children in conflict situations are
many. At the same time, we should recognize the
unimaginable resources that children and young people
possess even in the most difficult of circumstances.
Apart from being victims, they also have the potential
to contribute to reconciliation and conflict resolution.
The European Union wants to welcome the
efforts of the Secretary-General, and of the Council
itself, to integrate the protection of children into the
mandates of United Nations peacekeeping and peace-
building operations. Including child protection staff in
peacekeeping and peace-building operations is a
promising new element. We would welcome a
comprehensive assessment of the scope and
effectiveness of the response of the United Nations,
including recommendations for strengthening,
mainstreaming and sustaining activities related to
protecting children in armed conflict.
The promotion of peace is the overriding
responsibility of all countries, as well as of the
Council. But as long as armed conflicts are a reality,
we have a duty to promote the protection, as well as to
defend the rights, of their most vulnerable victims: the
children. The United Nations system as a whole has a
strong role to play in this regard, and we owe it to the
children of the world to mobilize its full potential.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Bahrain. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Saleh (Bahrain) (spoke in Arabic): First,
allow me to congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption
of the presidency of the Security Council for the month
of January. I also congratulate your predecessor, the
Permanent Representative of Colombia, on his
presidency of the Council. I would further like to take
this opportunity to express to all my best wishes for the
new year and my hope that it will bring peace and
security to all peoples.
For several years, the Security Council has
devoted part of its work to the consideration in public
meetings of issues such as the protection of civilians in
armed conflict, children and armed conflict and other
questions. We welcome that trend in the Council,
which allows non-members of the Council to take part
in the discussions on such important issues. It enhances
transparency in the Council and makes the Council
more effective in dealing with international issues,
especially those that might threaten international peace
and security.
There are two major reasons for focusing
attention on children and emphasizing the need to
protect them in armed conflict. The first is that children
are part of civil society. Accordingly, they must be
protected as stipulated by the provisions of the Fourth
Geneva Convention of 1949 relative to the Protection
of Civilian Persons in Time of War. The second reason
is that children are the most vulnerable sector of
society and are therefore the sector in greatest need of
protection and attention.
Since the beginning of the Council's debate on
children and armed conflict, in 1998, the Council has
adopted several resolutions and presidential statements
on the protection of children in armed conflict, such as
resolutions 1261 (1999), 1314 (2000) and 1379 (2001).
The United Nations, through its various bodies and
activities, has helped to strengthen the way in which
certain international concerns on the issue of children
in armed conflict are addressed, notably by making
child protection a component of peacekeeping and
post-conflict peace-building missions. Despite all this,
we still need to try harder to ensure the effective
implementation of, and full compliance with,
resolutions and international instruments concerning
the protection of children.
In that connection, my country would like to
express the following concerns. First, when
considering humanitarian issues such as the impact of
armed conflict on children, we should try to be
objective and credible and should try to avoid using
double standards. It is absolutely necessary that the
Security Council deal with the status of Palestinian
children affected by the Israeli occupation of their
territories.
Secondly, it might be necessary during future
consideration of this item to invite competent bodies
such as the United Nations Children's Fund and the
International Labour Organization to take part in the
Council's deliberations in order to take advantage of
their practical experience in this area. In that context,
we welcome the participation of Ms. Carol Bellamy
and her important statement on the issue.
Thirdly, the Council should consider following up
the resolutions it adopts, especially those on the issue
now being considered, by adopting methods and means
acceptable to members of the Council.
Fourthly, it is also necessary to increase
coordination and cooperation among the Security
Council, the General Assembly and the Economic and
Social Council. Such coordination would increase the
effectiveness of those organs when dealing with this
issue of common interest. Coordination among them
would prevent duplicating efforts and taking
contradictory measures. The Security Council can play
an essential role in the protection of children in armed
conflict, especially through its peacekeeping missions.
Likewise, the Economic and Social Council could play
a primary role in post-conflict peace-building. As for
the General Assembly, its principal role could be a
legislative one, especially through the relevant
international conventions and by making
recommendations, in particular at its special sessions
and other special events.
Finally, we express our hope that the
deliberations of the Security Council on children and
armed conflict will evolve into a concrete, practical
concern and that the Council resolutions will be
applied on the ground with objectivity and without
double standards. Recruitment of children, their sexual
exploitation, the violation of their rights and the impact
of foreign occupation on them are all considerations we
should take into account in order to help them and to
eliminate these phenomena. The Council plays an
important role in this regard.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker on my list is the representative of Switzerland.
I invite him to take a seat at the Council table and to
make his statement.
Mr. Staehelin (Switzerland) (spoke in French):
May I begin by congratulating France on assuming
once again the presidency of the Security Council and
wishing you and the new members of the Security
Council every success in carrying out the tasks
awaiting you.
Switzerland welcomes this annual Security
Council debate on children and armed conflict, as it
represents one of my country's priorities in matters of
human security. Switzerland takes note with
satisfaction of the Secretary-General's report
(S/2002/1299) and considers it to be a valuable
reference document on action undertaken in the United
Nations over the last year to respond to challenges with
regard to the rights of the child in armed conflicts. I
thank the Special Representative of the Secretary-
General for Children and Armed Conflict and the
Executive Director of the United Nations Children's
Fund for their respective presentations.
Switzerland expresses with conviction its
solidarity with the recommendations formulated by
Austria on behalf of the Human Security Network and
is convinced of the Security Council's essential role in
their implementation.
Switzerland reiterates its support for the
international community's numerous current efforts to
reinforce the protection of the civilian population in
times of armed conflict. Children are particularly
vulnerable, and the impact of conflict on their rights
and well-being can be felt at many levels and in
various ways: attacks on their rights to survival and
development, attacks on their physical integrity, attacks
on their rights to education and health, and the
destruction of their family structures and of their social
and community ties. Far too many of them also find
themselves refugees or internally displaced, orphaned
or unaccompanied. In the face of such situations,
Switzerland particularly recalls the importance of
respecting the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their two
Additional Protocols of 1977, in which specific
provisions for the protection of and assistance to
children are incorporated.
As underlined in the Secretary-General's report,
2002 saw the entry into force of two major
international instruments: the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflicts, and the
Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Switzerland, which ratified the Optional Protocol
last June, is committed to pursuing its efforts with a
view to ensuring its universal ratification as soon as
possible. It hopes that all States that have not yet done
this will follow its example by depositing a declaration,
as stipulated in paragraph 2 of article 3, indicating 18
years as the age limit for voluntary recruitment.
The entry into force of the Rome Statute
represents a major step towards an end to impunity.
Switzerland welcomes the steps taken by the Secretary-
General's Special Representative to ensure that the
International Criminal Court, as well as the Special
Tribunal for Sierra Leone, include particular
considerations regarding juvenile law into their
regulations and procedure.
Switzerland shares the Secretary-General's
opinion that the current major challenge resides in the
implementation of these international instruments,
which, by the standards they set, propose new
prospects for action. In this respect, it would have been
desirable for the report to formulate suggestions for
concrete actions to be taken by the Security Council
itself as well as by the United Nations system as a
whole, and by each of its Member States individually.
Switzerland emphasizes the innovative and
welcome contribution that resolution 1379 (2001)
represents, particularly the establishment of a list of
parties to armed conflicts that recruit or use children in
violation of the international provisions meant to
protect them. The political importance of this list is
undeniable, and it should certainly be maintained.
However, its true value will become apparent only
when the Security Council has defined the actions it
plans to undertake in this respect.
In this regard, Switzerland invites the Security
Council to consider the following recommendations.
We suggest that this list be updated on a regular basis.
Include in the list all countries and situations of armed
conflict which involve the problem of recruitment and
use of child soldiers and which appear on the Security
Council's agenda. Include on the list all other countries
and conflict situations which the Council may deem
necessary. Establish an ongoing dialogue with those
Governments named in the list and promote the
relevant instruments among the armed non-State actors.
Identify other criteria, in addition to the recruitment
and use of children, for developing the list, keeping in
mind the magnitude of the impact of armed conflicts on
children. At the conceptual level, the work
accomplished by non-governmental organizations on
this matter could constitute a particularly valuable
contribution.
To conclude, I wish to recall the commitments
made by the international community in the document
"A world fit for children", adopted at the General
Assembly's special session on children (resolution S-27/2). In this regard, Switzerland supports the
activities to create awareness and to integrate
children's rights in United Nations activities as a whole
and encourages the Organization to pursue and
intensify them at all levels. My country welcomes the
implementation of guiding principles for conduct for
all United Nations staff, which are essential to ensuring
that the behaviour of humanitarian personnel vis-a-vis
its beneficiaries is beyond reproach, and to prevent
abuse. We further invite the Security Council to
continue including child protection advisers in its
peacekeeping operations. They play a key role in
ensuring that the rights and specific needs of girls and
boys be taken into account and respected.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
representative of Switzerland for the kind words
addressed to my country.
Mr. Laurin (Canada) (spoke in French): First of
all, I should like to thank you, Sir, for convening this
open debate on children and armed conflict.
(spoke in English)
Given the present international context, and as we
approach the one-year anniversary of the Optional
Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child
on the involvement of children in armed conflict, we
are reminded that this is highly relevant work for the
Security Council.
I wish to begin by expressing my appreciation to
the Secretary-General for his substantive report
(S/2002/1299). In particular, we were pleased to see
specific conflict situations mentioned in the report as
well as in the annex. What is clear is that, while
progress has been made, the work of the Council is far
from complete. Ongoing child abduction, conscription
and the use of children in armed conflict make the
work of the Security Council all the more urgent.
We welcome the Security Council's acting as a
channel for Member States to receive information
about the impact of conflict on children, and we would
urge the Council in future to call for recommendations
for effective solutions to prevent the recruitment and
end the use of child soldiers. It is incumbent on us to
move away from general statements to specific action
and to build a system of accountability that cannot be
ignored. Now that Governments and armed groups
using children in armed conflict have been publicly
named, the challenge to the Security Council is to
make these parties accountable. This requires genuine
political will and resources. I congratulate the
Secretary-General for highlighting this reality in his
report.
I would like also to congratulate the Special
Representative of the Secretary-General, Mr. Otunnu,
as well as the United Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF), in partnership with non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and other United Nations
agencies, for their efforts in developing mechanisms
for integrating child protection into the peace and
security agenda. I would like to pay special tribute to
the critical work of civil society. We must continue to
collaborate with those organizations that are on the
front line of efforts to ensure effective monitoring and
to meet the protection and assistance needs of war-
affected children and their communities.
In particular, Canada welcomed the report of the
Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict in
November of last year, funded in part by the Canadian
Human Security Programme. That report illustrates
clearly how much work still needs to be done with
respect to monitoring, reporting and follow-up action
before, during and after armed conflict.
It goes without saying that Canada associates
itself fully with the statement that the representative of
Austria will make on behalf of the Human Security
Network.
Canada made commitments at the Winnipeg
Conference, and we fully intend to respect them. For
example, the Canadian International Development
Agency has committed $122 million to child protection
programmes and $2 million to child protection
research, including several projects on war-affected
children. Through our Human Security Programme, we
sponsor youth outreach and education initiatives
through War Child Canada, an organization that
provides humanitarian assistance to war-affected
children.
We believe that the efforts of Canada and of
others have helped turn the corner on monitoring and
reporting. Now we would like to see action taken when
the evidence is persuasive, as it is in the Secretary-
General's report.
To this end, Canada calls on the Security Council
to undertake field missions in the specific conflict
situations mentioned in the Secretary-General's report
and in particular closely to scrutinize the action of the
parties identified in the list annexed to the report. Such
field missions should include consultations with local
NGOs, women's organizations, youth groups and
children. The Security Council should ask for a six-
month interim report, evaluate progress made on these
situations, and commit itself to follow up in one year's
time on the parties named in this year's discussion.
Ultimately, if there is no real progress, the Security
Council must consider what actions it must take to give
effect to its decisions, including targeted sanctions. At
present, only countries on the Security Council's
agenda are mentioned in the Secretary-General's
report. This was a first step - one that should be
followed by the inclusion of all conflicts in future
reports.
For the sake of the children who are the victims
of such crimes, Canada believes this debate should be
made an annual event. Recommendations from relevant
resolutions, namely 1379 (2001), 1261 (1999) and
1314 (2000), should be assessed. In addition, Council
accountability for specific actions to enhance
protection and assistance for girls and boys affected by
armed conflict and their communities could be
reinforced.
The issue of children and armed conflict is linked
to the broader agenda item on protection of civilians
recently debated by the Council. The Security Council
and the broader United Nations system in its entirety
must ensure that these agenda items remain linked.
Although Council members agreed to consider
the protection of civilians, including the rights and
needs of children, in country-specific reports and
resolutions, it would appear to us that this has not been
done in every case. We call for renewed efforts towards
this end.
(spoke in French)
Discussions on small arms, disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration processes and access
should address directly the implications for children
and should pay special attention to the situation of the
girl child. One promising outcome of the United
Nations Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms
and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects was its
recognition of the impact of small arms on children.
While this represents progress, children continue to fall
victim to the ravages caused by the proliferation and
reckless use of small arms.
We commend the Economic Community of West
African States for having launched its child protection
unit within its secretariat. That is a very important
initiative that we hope will serve as a model for other
regional organizations in the integration of child
protection into their work.
We encourage United Nations agencies to
continue their efforts to improve training on children's
rights for United Nations staff and to evaluate lessons
learned from incorporating child protection into
peacekeeping operations. We believe that the six core
principles of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee
Task Force on Protection from Sexual Exploitation and
Abuse in Humanitarian Crises should be incorporated
into the mandate of all peacekeeping operations,
including the prohibition of sexual activity with
children. In addition, HIV/AIDS education and HIV
testing and counselling services should be offered to all
United Nations peacekeepers.
Impunity, humanitarian access and physical
protection, with specific consideration of sexual
exploitation, all are urgent issues that remain
unresolved, although they fall squarely within the
Council's purview and should be addressed. Canadian
representatives were pleased that very serious crimes
committed against children, including the use of child
soldiers to participate actively in hostilities, were
included in the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court (ICC). This was a significant
development in international law to protect children
from the devastating effects of armed conflict.
The ICC is an important additional international
mechanism to protect children's rights. We call on
those States that have not yet done so to ratify or to
accede to the ICC Statute. All States should welcome
the fact that the ICC will contribute to ending impunity
for serious crimes against children.
In the outcome document of the special session
on children, held in May 2002, States renewed their
commitment to strengthening the protection of children
affected by armed conflict. The Security Council has a
key role to play in ensuring that that commitment is
translated into action.
Canada firmly believes that all our actions must
be guided by the principles of the Convention on the
Rights of the Child, which remains the principal
instrument of reference and, indeed, the fundamental
legislative basis for achieving children's rights. The
primacy of the Convention needs to be strongly
reflected in our words and actions aimed at improving
the lives of children. The three landmark Security
Council resolutions on children and armed conflict -
1261 (1999), 1314 (2000) and 1379 (2001) - have
outlined steps to be taken, actors to be engaged and
mechanisms required to increase the protection of the
rights of war-affected children and their communities.
Progress has been made, but much more needs to
be done. The Security Council has a key role to play.
War-affected children have the right to expect that the
Council will do its part to the fullest extent possible.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker on my list is the representative of the
Philippines. I invite him to take a seat at the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Manalo (Philippines): At the outset, I wish
to congratulate you, Sir, and your country on your
chairmanship and leadership of the Council this month.
I also wish to express my delegation's appreciation for
this opportunity to speak on this important topic and to
thank the Secretary-General for his report on this very
important issue. We join others today in underscoring
the need for continued and concerted actions at both
the national and international levels to protect children
in armed conflict. We thank the Secretary-General, the
Special Representative of the Secretary-General for
Children and Armed Conflict and the Executive
Director of the United Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF) for their respective statements this morning.
It is estimated that there are 300,000 child
soldiers in the world, one fourth of whom are in the
East Asia and Pacific region. Most of these children
were forcibly recruited because of social and cultural
pressures or were simply abducted outright. Poverty
has also been a factor leading to child recruitment.
Those not recruited or abducted have also been victims
of displacement due to armed conflict.
Instead of being in school, these children have
served in the battleground, fighting, or as messengers
and couriers, as cooks, spies or sex slaves. That these
children have been and are involved in wars, growing
up in an environment of destruction, denies the world a
promising future.
One of the most important milestones for
protecting children from involvement in hostilities was
set last February with the entry into force of the
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child on the involvement of children in armed
conflict. It was indeed a positive step, a major step, and
will hopefully end the use of children under 18 years
old from serving as soldiers or directly participating in
hostilities.
The Philippines ratified the Optional Protocol last
April, and it has also ratified the 1990 International
Labour Organization Convention No. 182 concerning
the elimination of the worst forms of child labour. We
view these two international instruments as setting
strict standards for preventing the recruitment of
children as child soldiers.
Children are also protected by the Philippines
legal framework. Our Constitution provides that the
State shall defend the rights of children and especially
protect them from all forms of neglect, abuse and other
conditions prejudicial to their development. In this
regard, Philippines law provides that children shall not
be recruited for fighting and that they should be given
priority during evacuation as a result of armed conflict.
In recognition of their special situation, children
arrested for reasons related to armed conflict, whether
as combatants, couriers, guides or spies, are entitled to
release on recognizance within 24 hours to the custody
of the Government or any responsible member of the
community as determined by the courts.
We welcome the fact that the Security Council
has taken steps to address the matter of protection of
and assistance to children in situations of armed
conflict, particularly through resolutions 1261 (1999),
1314 (2000) and 1379 (2001). The Council must
continue to be seized with this issue and take every
opportunity to reaffirm its collective commitment to
protect children and prevent their involvement in
armed conflict by mainstreaming this concern in its
relevant decisions.
Post-conflict reconstruction programmes must
also be tailored to assist children affected by armed
conflict. In the case of girls and young women, who are
often the targets of sexual abuse, abduction and forced
recruitment, rehabilitation services are needed to deal
with their experiences and assist them in reintegrating
society. In the case of displaced children, aside from
basic food, medical care and education, counselling
and family reunification must be important components
of their reintegration programme.
For countries that have emerged from conflict, it
is important that any disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration programme include the demobilization
and rehabilitation of former child soldiers. Such
programmes must distinguish the post-conflict needs of
girl soldiers from those of their male counterparts. This
will ensure that the provisions for demobilization and
reintegration needs are directly related to the specific
ways that children have been abused or traumatized
during a conflict.
The healing and reintegration of children affected
by armed conflict should be a priority of any
reconstruction effort and, as such, must be backed by
sufficient resources. This is especially due to the
necessity of finding alternative peaceful ways for
children to develop and have a more meaningful future.
Children are our future. We must all help to
create a world fit for them. At the very least, we must
protect them from the horrors of armed conflict.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker on my list is the representative of Monaco. I
invite him to take a seat at the Council table and to
make his statement.
Mr. Boisson (Monaco) (spoke in French): I am
particularly pleased to see you, Sir, in the Security
Council presidency this month, and to congratulate
you.
Once again, we come to the Security Council to
plead a cause which affects the human being in his very
nature, as well as in his future. The recruitment of
children in armed conflicts is an intolerable and
unacceptable violation of the rights of the child, a
violation clearly condemned by the universal morality
to which the States of our Organization adhere.
Like many heads of delegation, the Chairman of
the delegation of Monaco to the special session of the
General Assembly on children, His Serene Highness
Crown Prince Albert, last May referred to this painful
issue, which, naturally and quite wisely, was
fortunately taken into account in the very important
final declaration adopted on that occasion.
The Secretary-General's report of 26 November
2002 (S/2002/1299) had already alerted us to the
difficulties which the Under-Secretary-General,
Mr. Olara Otunnu, had encountered in carrying out his
lofty mission, but also, we are pleased to see, to the
undeniable progress achieved, which is extremely
encouraging.
This public meeting of the Security Council, in
this first month of the year 2003, under the French
presidency, of which we appreciate both the initiative
and quality, gives us the opportunity to express our
unreserved support for the Secretary-General and his
Special Representative, and the opportunity to
encourage them to continue and strengthen their action
in favour of this noble cause.
As the principal organ under the United Nations
Charter with responsibility for the maintenance of
international peace and security, the Security Council
indeed urges us to undertake some soul-searching that
should lead us to take decisive decisions in order to put
an end to the painful situation of child soldiers. These
are tragic and pathetic situations that, beyond the
emotions they give rise to, undermine the principles of
humanity on which our cooperation is built and on
which rest our hopes and our deepest convictions.
Using children as a tool of war, of suffering and
death, is intolerable. This idea revolts and disturbs us.
As a crime against children, a crime of genocide, a war
crime, a crime against humanity, the use of children in
armed conflicts makes it incumbent on the international
community and the Security Council, which is its
authorized voice, to embark on a new stage. The report
of the Secretary-General and his message today, and
the message that his Special Representative has just
given us, as well as that of Ms. Carol Bellamy,
Executive Director of UNICEF, emphasize the urgency
and need for action.
The Principality of Monaco, on the initiative of
both its highest sovereign authorities and its people,
has consistently put the protection of childhood,
physical as well as moral, at the forefront of its
concerns and national and international commitments.
The public authorities have devoted many efforts to
this. Many non-governmental organizations, with the
support of the royal family, the Government and the
parliament, are also making unflagging efforts to
contribute to the protection of children in danger and
the improvement of their plight, particularly when it is
affected by poverty, violence and a destructive lack of
a future.
An international law symposium, which will be
followed by a public meeting with civil society, is now
being prepared in Monaco on the initiative of the
World Association of Friends of Children (AMADE).
Effectively headed by Crown Prince Albert, who
since May 1993 has chaired the Monaco delegation at
the General Assembly sessions, and by Her Royal
Highness Princess Caroline of Hanover, this initiative
should make possible a better grasp of the concepts and
the legal contexts involved nationally and
internationally in the protection of children, as well as
the ways of facilitating legal proceedings and
strengthening sanctions in the case of serious, flagrant
and repeated violations of their basic rights and
fundamental freedoms. The symposium should
contribute to increasing awareness, which is needed
now more than ever on the global level, of this serious
issue, given that we now have today - with the entry
into force of the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court and the two Optional Protocols to the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
Child - indispensable specific instruments to combat
this ultimate form of barbarism that affects children.
The Convention on the Rights of the Child, as
well as its Optional Protocol on children in armed
conflict - which the Principality has signed and
ratified - and the very valuable experience gained by
the international criminal tribunals will indeed be the
basis for this exercise in reflection, as will the role of
the International Criminal Court, which is awaited with
great hope.
This will involve, without academic disputes,
trying to determine, in a realistic way, the most
efficient legal and judicial ways and means to allow for
prosecuting, beyond time and space, the most serious
crimes against children.
The report of the Secretary-General on children
and armed conflict will also be, of course, at the heart
of the symposium and the meeting with civil society.
The Monaco authorities, which have contributed to the
special fund for children involved in armed conflict
since its inception, pay due tribute to the activities of
the Special Representative of the Secretary-General in
this area. They greatly welcome the provisions that he
advocates, given that they are without a doubt a
decisive stage in the protection of children during
armed conflict, internal as well as international, and
regardless of the parties involved. In particular, we
note with satisfaction the list of parties involved in
conflicts contained in the report's annex - parties
against which there is proof that they continue to
recruit and arm minors and use them without restraint
or caution in situations of extremely brutal hostilities.
The resolution to be adopted at the initiative of
France at the end of this exchange of views should
grant all the necessary legitimacy and authority to its
provisions to follow up specifically on the previous
Security Council resolutions, in particular resolutions
1261 (1999), 1314 (2000) and 1379 (2001).
Defining as a war crime by the Statute of the
International Criminal Court of forced recruitment of
children under the age of 15 in hostilities, including in
internal conflicts, as well as attacks on hospitals and
schools, or serious, repeated sexual violent acts, should
help us. This definition is decisive insofar as the
Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory
Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against
Humanity, of 26 November 1968, explicitly stipulates
in article I that war crimes and crimes against humanity
are without statutory limitation, like genocide, which
the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of
the Crime of Genocide, of 9 December 1948, considers
as a crime against the rights of nations, jus gentium,
whether committed in time of peace or in time of war.
I would recall furthermore that article VI of the
Convention on genocide had already provided for an
international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction
over such crimes, and article VII stipulated that such
crimes would not be considered political for the
purpose of extradition, which would also be agreed by
the contracting parties in accordance with their laws
and treaties in force. Article II (c) of this same
instrument also considers - and this is noteworthy -
that genocide also extends to an act of forced transfer
of children from one national, ethnic, racial or religious
group to another, committed with intent to destroy
them.
Today, as the Secretary-General stated in his
report, the true challenge lies in the implementation
and the effective application of existing international
instruments and norms. However, it is undeniable and
encouraging to note, undoubtedly for the first time in
such a report, references to Governments, paramilitary
organizations and armed groups that are guilty of
kidnapping children and training them, despite their
will, to become war criminals, murderers and torturers.
We now know the perpetrators of these crimes, or at
least some among them. We have the legal means to
prosecute and punish them. Without a doubt, we must
see to it that there is the political will to act and find
the financial and law enforcement resources to
intervene effectively.
Undoubtedly also, we must strengthen the
programmes for reinsertion of child soldiers and
develop new ones, while seeing to it that these
programmes become integral elements of any post-
conflict reconstruction and development projects. The
appointment of advisers in certain of the programmes
under way seems to be bearing fruit and therefore is an
interesting path to pursue and encourage. As the
Secretary-General has also recalled, the creation during
armed conflicts of protected zones in which women,
children, the elderly, the wounded and the disarmed
can find asylum and protection is one solution to
impose. It is a solution that the highest authorities in
Monaco have always wished to see encouraged and
promoted by the United Nations. Such zones should
benefit from secure access routes to allow for the
intervention of humanitarian personnel.
Ahmadou Kouroma, who has recounted his
adventures as a child soldier in a very beautiful novel
that received several literary prizes, clearly shows that
reinsertion is always possible and often crowned with
success. For, as this author wrote of his mother, "after
30 years of suffering, smoke and tears, there was still
something marvellous in the hollows of her face".
The moving observation by this child, a criminal
despite himself who found again his place in human
society, should lead us to be optimistic and give us,
with hope, the will to act that naturally follows from
this.
In that spirit of optimism and hope, we must have
the courage of our convictions and take the necessary
decisions in order to ensure that the recommendations
of the Secretary-General are effectively followed up
and his expectations fulfilled.
The clear and unambiguous desire of the
Government of the Principality is quite clear in this
regard: justice must be done, and international law,
which deals with this question extensively and in
detail, must triumph so that the murderers of children
are punished for their crime - the worst crime of all:
turning children into criminals and transforming their
innocence into barbarism.
Here, we believe that there are three crucial
elements. First, when internal judicial proceedings
have been exhausted, or in cases where such
proceedings have not been used, the competence of
international bodies, in particular the International
Criminal Court, should naturally come into play.
Secondly, crimes and violations against girls and
boys of less than 15 years of age should not be
excluded from the criminal definitions contained in the
Statute of the International Criminal Court as they
relate to the crime of genocide, crimes against
humanity and war crimes, under articles 6, 7 and 8 of
the Statute respectively.
Thirdly, it should be possible to apply, without
reservation, the principles of the Convention on the
Non-Applicability of the Statute of Limitations to War
Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity of 26 November
1968, as well as, when justified, those of the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide of 9 December 1948.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Rwanda. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Muvunyi (Rwanda): We would like to
congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption of the
presidency of the Security Council for the month of
January and to extend our congratulations to the
representatives of the new members of the Security
Council - Angola, Chile, Germany, Pakistan and
Spain. My delegation also wishes all the members of
the Security Council a happy and prosperous new year
for 2003.
The delegation of Rwanda welcomes this open
debate on the sensitive issue of children and armed
conflict. As a country emerging from genocide,
Rwanda has a wide experience to share on this
important topic of children and armed conflict. In
Rwanda, children were killed by genocidaires, and
survivors were traumatized by the violence, which left
orphans in its wake. Rwanda believes that all children
must go to school and that they must never again be
involved in armed conflict. In the 1994 Rwanda
genocide, children under 10 years old were used by
genocidaires to hunt and to kill fellow children, adults
and rape victims of the ge'nocidaires. After the tragedy,
children suspected of genocide were arrested,
imprisoned in special prisons and re-educated.
I would like to announce that this coming Friday,
child suspects in prison will be released in accordance
with the statement made by His Excellency President
Paul Kagame of the Republic of Rwanda on the release
of 40,000 suspects of genocide.
Rwanda is totally committed to the protection of
children and does not tolerate the abuse of children
under any circumstances.
The Rwandan delegation welcomes the report of
the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict,
document S/2002/ 1299. Rwanda hopes that action will
be taken. We fully agree with the statement made by
the Secretary-General in the Security Council this
morning.
We believe that sufficient funds must be spent on
the education of children for development, instead of
diverting financial resources to the destruction of
human beings. Children are the hope of tomorrow; that
is why special attention should be given to our young
children. Let us lead children to school and not to
armed conflict. Let us take them school and ensure that
there is follow-up so that they acquire appropriate
skills, knowledge, education and discipline as future
leaders of the world. The recruitment of children in
armed conflict must be halted at all costs as a matter of
urgency. Children must be able to grow in an
environment of peace, and should never be involved in
any armed conflict. That is why the Rwandan
delegation condemns armed groups which enlist
children under 18 years of age. It is dangerous to
indoctrinate children with the ideologies of hatred and
genocide with the final objective using them in fighting
useless wars without a cause.
Why use children in conflicts? As we know,
children naturally obey orders, even negative ones,
such as the order to kill innocent people. Children will
carry out any order in good faith because they do not
differentiate between evil and the best things. The
irrational warlords must understand why young
children should not be brainwashed and become
hostages of conflict. It is totally unacceptable to abuse
children, and the Security Council must take a firm
decision to reverse the current situation prevailing in
some States Members of the United Nations. We call
upon the Security Council and the international
community to condemn the armed groups of the former
Rwandan Army (ex-FAR) forces and Interahamwe, the
Parti pour la liberation du peuple hutu, the Front pour
la defense de la democratic, the Conseil national pour
la defense de la democratic, the Mai-Mai and others
mentioned in the annex of the report of the Secretary-
General as currently using child soldiers in the Great
Lakes region.
My statement would be incomplete if I did not
condemn those who rape children - as well as those
who rape adults. Rape is one of the weapons used in
armed conflicts, and children committed rape and were
raped during the Rwanda genocide of 1994. According
to Rwandese law covering acts of genocide, adults who
committed rape during the genocide are in the first
category of ge'nocidaires, who are given the death
penalty. Infanticide must also be punished by the death
penalty if we are to halt this crisis imposed on children.
Let me emphasize that young children are the
potential resources that can lift this world out of
poverty and injustice and attain irreversible progress in
accordance with the United Nations objective of
achieving sustainable development. Children must
therefore be freed from disease, hunger, slavery,
corruption and conflict of all types. They must grow in
an environment of love, peace and justice, with a thirst
for appropriate knowledge and the skills to develop
themselves. The whole world would thus harvest the
fruits of such well-guided children. Those who are
today involved in armed conflict must be demobilized
without delay, and the United Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF) must put in place strategies and procedures
and must provide the means for their implementation.
Let the Security Council join hands with UNICEF as
the saviour of the children of States Members of the
United Nations. Investing in the education of young
souls is the priority of priorities.
The authorities of the Republic of Rwanda are
grateful to Ms. Carol Bellamy, Executive Director of
UNICEF, and to Mr. Olara Otunnu, Special
Representative of the Secretary-General for Children
and Armed Conflict, for their assistance to Rwanda
orphans and to the many children who after the
genocide prematurely became leaders of families of
other children. Rwanda has a clear vision: to invest in
those children in order to achieve irreversible
development.
Finally, Rwanda requests and recommends that
the President of the Security Council declare a
universal ceasefire in favour of children in order to
withdraw them from armed conflicts. This is not a
favour, but a fundamental right for children who are
caught up in armed conflict and who are held hostage
in some areas of conflict. They must be handed over to
UNICEF. Even liberation movements must transfer
children to liberated areas or demilitarized zones. In
the case of displaced persons, Governments, non-
governmental organizations, the Red Cross and United
Nations agencies must attach special importance to the
welfare of children by providing them with appropriate
feeding, vaccination, medicines and schooling.
Demobilized children must go back to formal
schooling and should be motivated by UNICEF, the
United Nations Development Programme and
international financial institutions. Failure to save the
lives of children condemns the whole world to misery
and long-term social injustice.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Ukraine. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Kuchinsky (Ukraine): I would like to begin,
Sir, by expressing appreciation for the manner in which
you are presiding over the work of the Security Council
and by taking this opportunity to welcome you as the
Permanent Representative of France. I am confident
that your profound experience and excellent diplomatic
skills will contribute greatly to the Council's activities
and to the United Nations as a whole.
Let me also thank you and the delegation of
France for convening this important meeting. Ukraine
believes that the practice of holding Security Council
open debates on children and armed conflict is a clear
manifestation of the great significance of this issue.
Security Council resolutions 1261 (1999), 1314 (2000)
and 1379 (2001) became a strong basis for advocacy on
behalf of war-affected children. Various references to
this issue have been made in a large number of other
Security Council resolutions, presidential statements,
briefings and open debates. All this testifies to the
Council's involvement in this important matter and to
the fact that the protection of children is a priority
concern in the area of peace and security.
We are pleased with the considerable progress
made lately in the field of protection of children
affected by armed conflict. The entry into force of two
international instruments - the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflict and the
Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court
(ICC) - which qualify crimes against children as war
crimes, has become a milestone in strengthening and
developing worldwide standards for the protection of
children.
I would like to express appreciation to the
Secretary-General for his report on this issue
(S/2002/ 1299). For the first time, the report contains a
list of parties to conflicts that continue to recruit and
use children. Some 300,000 boys and girls are
currently being exploited as child soldiers around the
world. In our view, the publication of this list is yet
another important step forward in our efforts to put an
end to the impunity of those who disregard the rights of
war-affected children.
But it may not be enough just to condemn or
prohibit the recruitment of children. We need to ask
ourselves: why do children join armies? If we are to
prevent children from participating in the fighting, we
need to understand specifically the causes that force
children to become soldiers.
Ukraine welcomes the efforts of the Special
Representative of the Secretary-General for Children
and Armed Conflict, Mr. Otunnu, and his Office aimed
at creating, in cooperation with the Secretariat and the
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), guidelines
for United Nations peacekeeping personnel to ensure
that children's rights and needs are given proper
attention and response during the peacemaking process.
Peacekeeping missions have a crucial role to play
in providing protection to children. In order to
implement this particular dimension of their mandate, a
child protection adviser should be responsible for
coordinating activities to ensure the protection and
welfare of children. We are especially appreciative of
the fact that the first advisers of this kind have already
been deployed in Sierra Leone, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and, recently, in Angola.
Despite the progress achieved so far, much
remains to be done to ensure the effective protection
and rehabilitation of children in times of war. We
should not forget the alarming fact that during the last
decade of the past century the world lost some 2
million of its youngest lives as a direct result of armed
conflicts. Another 6 million were injured, and over
more than 10 million were traumatized. Today, more
than 20 million children have been displaced within or
outside their countries due to war. Every month, nearly
800 children are killed or crippled by landmines.
There is no doubt that the effective monitoring of
adherence to the provisions of international law and the
consequent obligations, as well as to the commitments
pledged by parties to conflict, are essential actions for
ensuring the protection of children and their rights. In
that regard, it is important to continue to include
observations concerning the protection of children in
reports to the Security Council on specific conflict
situations.
When designing peacekeeping operations, the
Security Council, in our view, should make every effort
to protect both children and their supportive
environment: schools, hospitals, health centres and
religious institutions. Ukraine strongly endorses the
concept of children and their protective and nurturing
institutions being considered as zones of peace. It is
important also to focus on children in post-conflict
reconciliation programmes. There is an urgent need for
the international community to support programmes,
including advocacy and social services, for the
demobilization of child soldiers and their reintegration
into the community. Such children should be offered
new experiences that will change their identity from
that of soldiers. Education and training remain
fundamental to that end. In our view, more attention
should also be given to greater involvement by women
in peacekeeping missions. We believe that that would
help to enhance the capacity of missions in terms of
protecting girl children and dealing with gender-
sensitive aspects.
Finally, I wish to stress that the Secretary-
General's report sets out an important agenda and a
basis for future work by the Council and by other
United Nations bodies. Ukraine looks forward to
further progress in that direction and is prepared to
contribute specifically to the subsequent consideration
of the issue of children and armed conflict.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Egypt. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Atta (Egypt) (spoke in Arabic): At the
outset, on behalf of the Egyptian delegation, I should
like to tell you, Sir, how grateful we are to your
friendly country and to congratulate you on your
assumption of the presidency of the Security Council
for this month. We should also like to thank the
Secretary-General, Mr. Kofi Annan, and his Special
Representative, Mr. Olara Otunnu, for their tireless
efforts and valuable contributions aimed at enhancing
and protecting the rights of children in armed conflict,
and we reaffirm our total support for those efforts.
During the past two years, the Security Council
has devoted considerable attention to children in armed
conflict, playing its role in that sphere by taking
decisions related to peace-building and peacekeeping
operations and by asking the parties to conflict to
respect international law, in particular with regard to
the protection of children. That is commendable, and
complements the General Assembly's primary
responsibility for children's issues. In that connection,
I should like to express our gratitude to Mr. Olara
Otunnu for his efforts and to draw attention to the
importance of his field visits to raise awareness, to
promote and to strengthen the protection, rights and
well-being of children affected by armed conflict. In
his report (S/2002/1299), the Secretary-General says
that Mr. Otunnu's visits had helped in the assessment
of the situation of children in armed conflict, in making
specific recommendations and in heightening the
international community's awareness of the problems
faced by children.
In that regard, we reiterate our demand that the
Special Representative of the Secretary-General visit
children living under Israeli occupation in the occupied
Palestinian territories and prepare a report on effective
measures to help protect those children in
implementation of the relevant provisions of the
outcome of the General Assembly's May 2002 special
session on children, as cited by the Assembly on 18
December 2002 in its resolution 57/190. Palestinian
children are not only suffering from occupation, with
its devastating psychological consequences; they are
also deprived of their fundamental rights, including the
right to live in security in a stable family environment.
Not only are their families deprived of shelter and
work; their lives are threatened if they ask for their
legitimate fundamental rights.
The suffering of Palestinian children does not
stop there: they are deprived of a future, because they
are given no tools to improve their future. Palestinian
schools have been closed, and Palestinian children
cannot continue their studies because of the constraints
that have been imposed on them. The Secretary-
General has stated that the cordoning off of the
territories, the curfews, the barriers and the checkpoints
give rise to humanitarian problems, which result in the
deterioration of education. The suffering of Palestinian
children has exceeded all limits: unless the situation
improves, there is no hope for the short-term future.
Therefore, Egypt urges all countries to help
Palestinian children by ensuring their humanitarian and
other basic needs. We invite the Special Representative
of the Secretary-General to undertake a field visit to
the region in order to raise awareness of the situation
on the ground and to enable the international
community to adopt effective necessary measures
aimed at relieving the suffering of Palestinian children
and ensuring their protection.
Egypt supports all national and international
efforts in the area of protecting the rights of children
and improving their situation. We are firmly convinced
that the economic, social, political and cultural
progress of any society depends on the overall
physical, moral, mental and educational development
of its children. Over the past decade, the international
community has undertaken many commendable efforts
and has made great achievements in that area. Despite
the success of the World Summit on Children, held in
1990, and the setting of ambitious goals to help
children, the world still witnesses a number of factors
that have had a negative impact on children, such as
the economic effects of debt, illness and epidemics.
Recent years have witnessed a prevalence of armed
conflict, a lack of respect for international law -
especially international humanitarian law - and
various violations of the rights of civilians. Hence, the
problem of children in armed conflict - despite efforts
to prevent their recruitment and to ensure their
demobilization and reunification with their families,
their protection from systematic violence and their
psychological reintegration into their homes and
communities. The Secretary-General's innovation in
his report - the list of parties to conflict that are
violating children's rights - is a commendable
initiative that should be studied with a view to taking
the necessary actions to track down those who violate
the rights of children and bring them to justice. Within
the framework of our commitment to work with the
international community on issues pertaining to
children in armed conflict, we urge that children be
enabled to live in security and stability.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Austria. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Pfanzelter (Austria): I have the honour to
speak in Austria's capacity as current Chair of the
Human Security Network, an interregional group of
countries that also comprises Canada, Chile, Greece,
Ireland, Jordan, Mali, the Netherlands, Norway,
Slovenia, Switzerland and Thailand, and South Africa
as an observer.
Ever since the creation of the Human Security
Network, in 1999, the issue of children affected by
armed conflict has been of critical importance to our
agenda. The Network and its individual members have
witnessed the origin of several important initiatives,
such as the Agenda for War-Affected Children, adopted
at the Winnipeg Conference in September 2000; the
holding of workshops on the issue of ending the use of
child soldiers in Jordan; and the programmes of the
Centre for Children Traumatized by Armed Conflicts in
South-Eastern Europe, in Ljubljana, Slovenia, to name
but a few.
Austria made children and armed conflict one of
the top priorities during its period in the chairmanship
of the Network. At its next ministerial meeting in May
this year in Graz, the Human Security Network is
expected to adopt a common support strategy for
children affected by armed conflict, identifying a set of
operative principles as well as a training curriculum for
child-rights monitors and rehabilitation experts. One of
the results envisaged is that the Network will
contribute to establishing a pool of child experts for
eventual use in conflict areas.
In November 2002, the Human Security Network
supported the holding here in New York of an
international symposium on children affected by armed
conflict. The event was organized by the Harvard
Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict
Research, in cooperation with the Coalition to Stop the
Use of Child Soldiers, the Watchlist on Children and
Armed Conflict, the United Nations Children's Fund
and the Office of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General. The symposium focused on the
implementation of Security Council resolution 1379
(2001) and came up with a set of concrete
recommendations, which have been communicated to
the members of the Council.
Let me now touch upon the politically significant
report of the Secretary-General before us. We strongly
support the general thrust of this report and I would
like to highlight a few of its aspects.
It is indeed astonishing how the normative
framework for the protection of children in armed
conflict has been strengthened during the recent past.
In less than a month, we will celebrate the first
anniversary of the entry into force of the Optional
Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child
on children in armed conflict.
While progress with regard to the normative
framework for the protection of children in armed
conflict is certainly remarkable, I would like to
reinforce the call made by the Secretary-General and
his Special Representative to focus now on application.
There is an essential role for the United Nations system
in ensuring better implementation of the relevant
standards, in the first place through an enhanced
operationalization of activities in the field. Austria and
the Office of the Special Representative are currently
working together on a compendium containing all
relevant international standards, which will be
published shortly and is supposed to improve the
understanding and knowledge of those dealing with
children in armed conflict.
Let me now come to the much anticipated list
requested by Security Council resolution 1379 (2001).
The Human Security Network welcomes the list
annexed to the report, as well as the description in the
report of further situations of concern, which could not
be added to the list due to formal reasons. This list is
without doubt a major and politically significant
contribution to raising awareness about the plight of
children affected by armed conflict around the world
and to eventually ending the recruitment of child
soldiers. It also clearly demonstrates that the
international community is no longer willing to close
its eyes before one of the biggest tragedies we are
facing today.
While the annexed list candidly names 23 parties
to armed conflict that recruit or use child soldiers and
meet the other criteria set out in resolution 1379
(2001), it is, however, obvious that it excludes large
numbers of children equally affected by armed conflict.
We therefore believe that the list needs to be extended.
It should encompass all other situations where children
are recruited or used as soldiers or where their
protection needs are severely threatened in other ways.
As an example, I would like to direct members'
attention to one situation which is particularly
alarming: the ongoing abduction of numerous boys and
girls in northern Uganda. Based on reports from a
variety of sources, we have reason to believe that large
numbers of children are still being abducted and held
by the Lord's Resistance Army for use in combat or as
sex slaves. The Human Security Network is currently
evaluating possible action to shed more light on this
situation and to put a halt to this abominable practice.
At the same time, we feel that it is necessary also for
the Security Council to be able to better assess such
situations.
The Human Security Network has concrete
recommendations to present to the Council which, in
our View, would significantly increase the ability of
this forum to address the issue of children and armed
conflict and will have an impact on the lives of war-
affected children. The 10 recommendations can be
summarized as follows.
We should continue the consideration of the issue
of children and armed conflict on a regular basis and
adopt new resolutions adding value to the debate.
We should create an effective evaluation
mechanism for the list of parties to conflict recruiting
or using child soldiers and the relevant steps taken by
those on it. This could include field visits. The
involvement of international agencies and non-
governmental organizations in this process is crucial.
The Secretary-General should be requested to
regularly update this list and consider extending it by
also including conflict situations not on the Council's
agenda, as well as other severe violations of relevant
child-protection obligations, such as abductions or the
use of landmines.
We should enter into a dialogue with the
Governments of countries on the list, ask them to
report on the respective situations and urge them to put
an immediate end to the recruitment or use of child
soldiers, to reintegrate them into society and to stop all
other severe violations of child-protection obligations.
We must also raise awareness among all parties
concerned, including non-State actors, of their
obligations and responsibilities under international
humanitarian, human rights, refugee and criminal law.
We should ensure that the issue of children
affected by armed conflict is also taken up under other
agenda items of the Council, in particular when
considering resolutions on specific conflict situations
or when planning Security Council missions.
According to a study by the Watchlist, only 9 out of 75
country-specific Security Council resolutions adopted
between August 2000 and October 2002 included
references to children and armed conflict.
Attention must also be paid to the need for all
peace processes; all disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration processes; and all justice and
reconciliation mechanisms to be child-conscious and
for boys and girls to be fully involved in order to make
sure that their voices are heard.
The child-focused expertise in these processes
should be increased and the training of peacekeeping,
civilian police and humanitarian personnel on child
protection standards promoted. Each peacekeeping
operation should include at least one child protection
expert. The establishment of rosters of qualified
experts available should be encouraged.
We should give higher priority to the issues of
violence against, trafficking in and exploitation of
children, in particular girls, and to the prevention of
infectious and sexually transmitted diseases and
HIV/AIDS, and request the provision of adequate
assistance to the children affected.
The Human Security Network also suggests that
efforts be made to ensure safe and unhindered access to
humanitarian assistance for children in emergencies,
with emphasis on particularly vulnerable groups such
as displaced and separated children.
Finally, the Network suggests improving the
exchange of information with non-members,
international agencies and NGOs on the issue of
children affected by armed conflict and the
establishment a focal point for that purpose.
In conclusion, let me assure the Council that the
members of the Human Security Network remain fully
committed to enhancing the protection of children in
armed conflict. This is indeed an urgent matter
pertaining to our common values and our conscience as
human beings.
The President (spoke in F rench): I would like to
inform the Council that there are 17 speakers
remaining on my list. I intend, with the cooperation of
the participants, to exhaust the entire list this
afternoon.
The next speaker is the representative of Nepal. I
invite him to take a seat at the Council table and to
make his statement.
Mr. Sharma (Nepal): I wish to begin by
extending to you, Mr. President, and the other members
of the Security Council warm, although belated, wishes
for a happy new year. Let me also say how delighted
my delegation is to see you so ably presiding over the
Council.
Children, the weakest sector of a population,
suffer in many ways in situations of armed conflict.
They lose their parents and other loved ones. They lose
their homes and livelihoods. They lose basic services
such as education and health. And they even lose their
lives. Those who survive are often forced to live in
camps and or in confinement as refugees or displaced
persons and become susceptible to exploitation and
temptations.
The most horrendous crime that the parties to a
deadly conflict commit is to use child soldiers. This
robs children of their childhood and innocence and
places them in a world of murder and mayhem.
Traumatized and stigmatized, such children have
difficulty coping with normal life and blossoming to
their full potential.
We have internationally agreed safeguards for the
protection of children, but they remain ineffective in
delivering results. The Convention on the Rights of the
Child and its relevant Optional Protocol, Additional
Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions and Convention
No. 182 of the International Labour Organization (ILO)
set basic international standards for the protection of
children. They are complemented by a number of other
compacts, conventions and resolutions. The
International Criminal Court is certainly another potent
instrument to protect children in armed conflict.
Despite those provisions, children continue to
face misery, exploitation and death in conflicts. The
world community faces a daunting challenge: to
stringently enforce those provisions. Part of the
problem is due to the fact that world community has
been incoherent in its response to conflict. Political
considerations get in the way of devising a cogent and
seamless set of actions. More often than not, funding
has failed international compacts, whose vision loses
focus along the trail of implementation.
Critical is the imperative to ensure that the
perpetrators of violence against children do not go
unpunished. Crimes against children should not only be
excluded from amnesty; they should also carry heavier
punishments. Special measures, including punishment,
are essential to protect girl children. The nature of, and
potential damage from, a conflict should determine the
priority and extent of the international community's
response.
Clearing landmines should be undertaken with a
sense of urgency, and should receive adequate funding.
Resolute political will must be demonstrated to ensure
effective control of small arms, which maim and kill
most children. Collective efforts should be
strengthened to prevent fuelling conflicts with proceeds
from the exploitation of natural resources, drug
trafficking and other criminal activities.
Juvenile justice should constitute an important
part of domestic courts and of international tribunals
and courts to try child soldiers who might have
committed grave crimes. A comprehensive programme
should be put in place to demobilize child soldiers, as
well as to give them skills and to rehabilitate them and
reintegrate them into their communities.
While a tailor-made response is essential to
resolve disputes and prevent conflicts, we must also
look at the larger picture and remove the causes or
aggravating factors of conflicts. This calls for
eradicating poverty and promoting sustainable
development, as well as advancing justice and human
rights around the world.
In 9 out of 10 cases, non-State actors have been
committing the horrendous crime of recruiting and
deploying children as combatants with impunity.
Changing the culture of impunity demands a fresh
outlook as well as strengthened mechanisms and
measures from the world community. Let me share a
glaring example from my own country. As the
Secretary-General has mentioned in the report before
the Council (S/2002/1299), children are being
subjected to forced and involuntary recruitment by the
Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). Indeed the
Maoists, who are seeking to remove the constitutional
monarchy and who are undermining democratic values
and institutions, have turned children into sacrificial
lambs in their brutal pursuit of political power.
Yesterday, the Maoists reportedly abducted 80 children
from a school. The other day they took 150 children
from school at gunpoint. These children are forced to
undergo combat training. They are often used as human
shields in attacks. This is something the rebels have
been doing on a regular basis. Young girls have
become the principal targets of abduction by the
Maoists, who are reportedly striving to induct more
women into their guerrilla force. Families that do not
consent to giving their children away face the direst
consequences.
This terror has set back the clock of progress in
Nepal, a least developed country that was taking
determined steps towards modernization. The Maoists
are destroying schools and health posts, bridges and
communication towers. They have also been killing
teachers and political workers. Consequently, children
are deprived of education and health services. The
movement of people and trade have been impaired and
tourism has dwindled. Villages have lost young men
and women, as they flee their homes to escape Maoist
atrocities and conscription. Development activities in
rural areas have ground to a halt.
Nepal has been trying its best to find a peaceful
settlement to the problem. Only recently, His Majesty
the King has appealed to all political forces to find a
peaceful solution to the country's political problems
and to engage the country's resources and energy in
promoting development and prosperity for the common
people. The Prime Minister has also called on the
Maoists to come to the negotiating table and has
promised to create the necessary environment for talks
to begin. Given their trail of deception, their attitude
towards negotiation - treating it as a tactical step to
destroy the enemy rather than as a strategic framework
for a peaceful resolution of conflict - and their
confusing and often contradictory statements, the
Maoists are yet to emerge as a credible partner for
peace. Still, the Government is willing and eager to
talk to stop the wanton bloodletting so that the nation
can pursue the path of peace and progress with total
dedication and commitment.
Nepal is committed to protecting children in
armed conflict. We have no child soldiers in our
security forces. But we are profoundly distressed by
the fact that the Maoists have been abusing our
children, stifling their development and darkening their
future. While bringing Maoists to justice for their
crimes remains our obligation, we have instituted a
programme to rehabilitate and reintegrate children who
have escaped the Maoist trap. We will need the
international community's financial and technical
support in our endeavour.
Central to that is the United Nations, whose
remarkable work we commend. Our appreciation goes
to the front-line agencies of the United Nations,
including the United Nations Children's Fund, the
United Nations Development Programme and others,
for their work to protect children and promote their
interests. We urge the Security Council to remain
seized of situations under its consideration and to
remain vigilant about others so that international peace
and security are not jeopardized.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
Representative of Nepal for the kind words he
addressed to my delegation.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Israel. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Mekel (Israel): At the outset, I would like to
extend my congratulations to you, Sir, on your
assumption of the presidency for the month of January.
Since this is my first statement before the Council,
allow me to say that I look forward to a productive
working relationship with you and with all the other
members of the Council.
Israel is pleased to be participating once again in
the debate on this item. Of the wide range of issues on
the Council's agenda, those affecting the well-being of
children are among the most heartbreaking. The
images, reports and statistics documenting the plight of
children in areas of armed conflict paint a truly horrific
picture. And it is precisely that horror that compels us
to take action.
The most recent report of the Secretary-General
on children and armed conflict (S/2002/ 1299) contains
a review of the progress made in implementing
Security Council resolutions and other international
instruments, as well as recommendations and
observations aimed at achieving more widespread
conformity with international norms. We welcome the
report's general focus on the horrific practice of using
children as soldiers. Children should be kept safe in
school, not in harm's way on the battlefield. Instead,
too many children are recruited to fight as soldiers in
wars they did not start and are forced to give up their
childhoods and often their lives in the perpetuation of
destructive conflicts. These offences have long
disturbed our moral sensibilities.
Israel totally rejects the practice of using children
as soldiers. We remain committed to eradicating this
horrific practice and to improving more generally the
situation of all children affected by armed conflict.
Israel also supports efforts to increase awareness of the
effects of armed conflict on children and to take
children into greater consideration when addressing
related issues, including terrorism and peacekeeping
operations.
Israel further welcomes the report's specific focus
on those parties to an armed conflict that have failed to
live up to their obligations by recruiting or using child
soldiers. Our ability to make genuine progress will
depend not only on focusing on areas in which progress
has been made but also on areas in which it has not.
Obviously, the formal practice of the forced
conscription of children is abhorrent and must be
outlawed and condemned. But the participation of
children in conflict is not limited to formal military
service. Children have also been recruited for roving
militias, armed gangs and terrorist groups. In our
region, children have been recruited and used by
terrorist organizations as human shields, for the placing
of explosives, as gunmen and even as suicide bombers,
and it is regrettable that the Secretary-General's report
does not mention this reprehensible tactic.
Moreover, children have been educated to revere
and emulate fighters and terrorists. In our region, we
are faced with the disturbing phenomenon of children's
television programmes that encourage youngsters to
abandon their studies and sacrifice their lives in acts of
war and terrorism.
The subtler but no less repugnant indoctrination
of children to hatred and violence, through official
media, educational and religious institutions and other
means, must also be the focus of widespread
condemnation. Hatred and violence are learned
behaviours. No child is born wanting to hate or kill. If
we are ever to achieve the state of global peace that is
the central objective of the Organization, we must
ensure that we are educating the next generation in the
values of tolerance, coexistence and non-violence.
In our region, children have suffered terribly from
decades of conflict and from the constant threat of
terrorism. The Middle East has endured more than its
share of wars that have left scars on all people in the
region, but particularly on children.
Israel has therefore supported international
initiatives aimed at protecting children from the
devastation of armed conflict, including the landmark
Convention on the Rights of the Child, as well as the
Convention's Optional Protocols, to which we became
a signatory last year. Israel's accession to the
Convention was followed by the adoption of its Basic
Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, a law that ensured
that rights of the child were guaranteed constitutional
protection. The adoption of that law sparked a flurry of
judicial and legislative activity that broadened and
extended Israeli society's commitment to the principles
of the Convention.
Unfortunately, broad commitment to those
principles, while reflected in the rhetoric of many
delegations, is too often not matched in practice. There
remain delegations that are quick to unite under the
banner of protecting children from armed conflict, but
whose actions betray their true political motives. Those
delegations are far too willing to sacrifice genuine
progress on these issues in favour of their political
agenda.
In its most recent session, the General Assembly
adopted a resolution pertaining specifically to the
situation facing Palestinian children. With the adoption
of that resolution, the Assembly has brought to three
the number of resolutions on the human rights of
children: one regarding the rights of the child, one
regarding girls and one regarding Palestinian children.
The latter is the only resolution adopted with respect to
one specific group of children. There is, for instance,
no resolution adopted concerning the five specific
problematic areas cited by the Secretary-General in his
report.
While Palestinian children are undoubtedly
deserving of protection, one may ask whether the 106
Israeli children killed and the many Israeli children
wounded by terrorism since September 2000, or the
children in Africa or in parts of the Arab world are any
less deserving. Notwithstanding the questionable
wisdom of adopting particularized resolutions on issues
of universal concern, it is a grave shame that those who
supported that one-sided resolution were unable to rise
above narrow their political agenda and call for the
protection of both Israeli and Palestinian children alike.
We would urge responsible Member States not to
indulge in such politicization of the work of the United
Nations, especially with respect to an issue as
important and urgent as our children. When we allow
the issue of human rights to be used as a political
weapon we cast doubt on our very commitment to
human rights and we damage the credibility of this
institution and its ability to work effectively on issues
of common concern.
Israel yearns for the day when peace is the
prevailing global condition, and when there is no
longer any need to deal with the specific impact of
armed conflict on children. But until that day, the
international community must continue to act with
resolve in extending protection to those who are most
vulnerable. Israel is a full partner in this endeavour and
will act through all means to ensure that all the world's
children enjoy their fundamental right to grow up free
from fear, free from suffering and free from the horrors
of war and terrorism.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker is the representative of Ethiopia. I invite him to
take a seat at the Council table and to make his
statement.
Mr. Hussein (Ethiopia): At the outset, Sir, let me
congratulate you and your delegation on your
assumption of the presidency of the Council. My
congratulations go also to the new non-permanent
members: Angola, Chile, Germany, Pakistan and Spain.
Ethiopia is grateful for this opportunity to address
the Council on the issue of children and armed conflict.
My delegation would also like to thank the Secretary-
General for his report on children and armed conflict
(S/2002/l299) as well as for his brief but important
presentation this morning. I also join previous speakers
in thanking Mr. Olara Otunnu and Ms. Carol Bellamy
for the excellent presentations they made and for
pointing out important issues we need to follow up on.
I know that time is short and that there are many
other speakers on the list, so I shall cite only some of
the points I was going to make; copies of my full
statement have been made available.
Today's debate is the fifth open debate the
Security Council has devoted to the protection of
children in armed conflict. That indicates that it is very
serious about this issue and gives it the importance that
it deserves.
We also welcome the continued efforts of the
Secretary-General to put the protection of children in
armed conflict on the peace and security agenda of the
United Nations; in that respect we strongly support his
recommendation to integrate child protection in
peacemaking, peacekeeping and peace-building
operations of the United Nations.
There are many who are involved in the work of
making the lives of children more agreeable in all its
aspects. But I will cite only two: the Office of the
Special Representative of the Secretary-General for
Children and Armed Conflict and the United Nations
Children's Fund. I commend them for their work and
for their activities on behalf of children.
One can list many things; one can say many
things. I think what needs to be said has been said by
the Secretary-General and by all those who spoke
before me. But I will say that there are two areas
implied in the title of what we are discussing today:
"Children and armed conflict". Under the first, we have
to take all the actions needed to stop those who violate
the rights and the sanctity of the lives of children and
take action against them. Secondly, when we talk of
armed conflict, we have to look at the root causes of
such conflict all over the world.
I would conclude by saying that if the Council
and the international community took a fraction of the
time and resources they are now spending on one
particular area of the world and spent it on this issue of
stopping those who are attacking children, abducting
children and recruiting children, then I am sure within
a short period, even before the end of this year, that
problem would have been dealt with.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
representative of Ethiopia for the kind words addressed
to my delegation.
The next speaker is the representative of Costa
Rica. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table and
to make his statement.
Mr. Stagno (Costa Rica) (spoke in Spanish):
Over the past four years the Security Council has been
holding periodic open debates on the situation of
children in armed conflict. Unfortunately, the debates
have had little practical impact. Mr. Olara Otunnu,
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on
Children and Armed Conflict, has reminded us that
today more than 300,000 children under the age of 18
are involved in more than 30 armed conflicts. Millions
of children have been the innocent victims of war: they
have been killed, have become refugees or have been
displaced. Hundreds of thousands more have been
orphaned or left defenceless as a result of armed
conflict.
To be sure, in the past few years some progress
has been made at the legal level. We welcome the entry
into force of the Optional Protocol to the Convention
on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of
children in armed conflicts, which bans compulsory
recruitment and participation in hostilities for those
under the age of 18. Unfortunately, the Protocol does
not also prohibit voluntary recruitment of minors.
We are also pleased at the entry into force of the
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
(ICC), which classifies as a war crime the recruitment
of children under the age of 15. But much remains to
be done, and all States should now accede to the
Optional Protocol and the Rome Statute.
We were pleased to see the inclusion in the
Secretary-General's report of a list of parties to armed
conflicts that recruit or use children as combatants, in
violation of their international obligations under
paragraph 16 of resolution 1379 (2001).
It is high time for the international community to
shoulder its responsibilities vis-a-vis those who are
committing such massive violations of the fundamental
rights of children. The Security Council must act. The
Council must now require of those entities and States
on the list that they stop recruiting children and
demobilize those already recruited. Where necessary,
the Council should consider imposing sanctions on
entities or Governments that use or recruit children in
their armed forces.
But we cannot fail to note that we do not agree
with the rather restrictive interpretation offered by the
Secretary-General of the mandate contained in
paragraph 16 of resolution 1379 (2001). In particular,
we would question the Secretariat's decision to include
on the list only those situations currently on the
Council's agenda. We believe that the Secretariat
would have done better by the children of the world
had it adopted a broader approach to its mandate. We
would like, therefore, to invite members of the Security
Council to give detailed consideration to a parallel
report that was prepared by a coalition of non-
governmental organizations, the Coalition to Stop the
Use of Child Soldiers.
This parallel report includes a number of well-
founded accusations against various governmental,
paramilitary and revolutionary entities in 25 countries,
as well as a list of specific recommendations to deal
with each one of them. I would like, if I may, to
mention a few of them.
For example, on Afghanistan, the Coalition
recommends that the Security Council monitor the new
national army and existing factions so as to ensure that
they are not recruiting children under the age of 18. On
Somalia, they also recommend to all parties that they
adopt a policy of non-recruitment of children under the
age of 18.
On Angola, Burundi, Guinea-Bissau and Sierra
Leone, the Coalition recommends the implementation
of specific programmes for the demobilization and
reintegration of child soldiers as well as the creation of
educational and employment opportunities in refugee
camps, as an alternative to joining a rebel force.
On Colombia, the Sudan, India and Indonesia, the
Coalition recommends the inclusion of all
revolutionary and paramilitary groups on the list
prepared pursuant to paragraph 16. On Myanmar, the
Coalition believes that both Government and
opposition forces should be included in the list.
The Coalition recommends that the Government
and opposition groups in Liberia should demobilize
child soldiers. On Macedonia, Yugoslavia and Pakistan,
it deems necessary further investigation to determine if
opposition paramilitary groups are, in fact, recruiting
children.
On the Democratic Republic of the Congo and
Nepal, the Coalition suggests, inter alia, the
classification of the recruitment of children as a
criminal offence. With respect to Palestine and the
occupied territories, the Coalition calls on the various
groups not to encourage children to participate in acts
of violence.
With respect to the Russian Federation, the
Coalition is proposing that the Chechen rebel groups be
included on the paragraph 16 list. On Rwanda and
Uganda, the Coalition recommends the adoption of
measures to implement the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, including the
carrying out of programmes for the demobilization and
reintegration of child soldiers.
Lastly, the Coalition recommends that the
Secretary-General draw the attention of the Security
Council to the situation in Sri Lanka.
As can be seen from this list of recommendations,
the Security Council is facing a tremendous task if an
end is to be put to the use of child soldiers.
Accordingly, we believe that the Council must adopt a
holistic approach to protect young people.
First, the Council should ensure that any
resolution or measure adopted to deal with a specific
situation of armed conflict must include clear and
specific provisions aimed at safeguarding the security
and fundamental rights of children during armed
confrontation.
Second, the Council should set up an institutional
mechanism that would enable it to consider, on an
ongoing and comprehensive basis, the problem of
children in armed conflict. The Council should,
accordingly, set up a subsidiary body to monitor the
situation of children in all situations that are on the
Council's agenda. To that end, it would make use of
information provided by Member States and by non-
governmental organizations. Following the model of
the Counter-Terrorism Committee, the subsidiary body
set up should have a group of independent experts who
would evaluate objectively the information that is
received. They could also carry out fact-finding
missions where there are accusations of serious
violations of the rights of the child, and they could
offer early warning in the event of a situation that
might threaten the security of children.
Third, the Security Council, with assistance from
the Secretary-General, should, on an ongoing basis,
maintain, review and update the list of entities that
recruit or use children in conflict, in violation of their
international obligations. It is essential to broaden the
list to include not just situations already on the
Council's agenda, but also situations that, because of
the seriousness of the violations of children's rights
involved, should be referred to the Council by the
Secretary-General. In this connection, the Council
should request the Secretary-General to update the list
regularly.
Fourth, the Security Council should ensure that
plans for the post-conflict demobilization, disarmament
and reintegration of combatants must include
programmes to facilitate the rehabilitation of child
soldiers. Peace-building processes must take account of
the perspective and the needs of children.
Fifth, it is essential to take effective steps to
regulate illicit trafficking in small arms and light
weapons, which facilitate the use of children as
combatants and are the main weapons used in the
destruction wrought. We would advocate a complete
prohibition on the transfer of weapons, ammunition and
military assistance to Governments or armed groups
that violate human rights, including the fundamental
rights of children.
Sixth, the Security Council, in any peacekeeping
operation, must include humanitarian personnel who
are dedicated to dealing with the problems of children
who are victims of conflict. Such personnel should
facilitate the provision of humanitarian assistance to
children during conflicts. In this context, we are
pleased that the Security Council has included in some
peacekeeping operations expert advisers on the
protection of children.
Seventh, before adopting any sanctions regime,
the Security Council should carry out an in-depth study
of any possible impact on the most vulnerable
population, particularly children. Any sanctions regime
must include exceptions so as to minimize any
damaging impact on children.
We deem it essential that the Secretary-General
make full use of his powers under Article 99 of the
Charter and refer to the Security Council any situations
of armed conflict in which young people under the age
of 18 are being recruited or used in fighting.
Over the long term, the only way to save children
from evil consequences of armed conflict is to do away
with war. As long as war exists, we cannot free
children from those harmful consequences. As long as
there are wars, children will be orphaned, displaced,
hurt or killed. As long as there are wars, schools and
hospitals will be burned down, roads destroyed and
families broken apart. As long as there are wars, it will
be impossible to ensure that children can fully develop
into worthy, productive and creative adults.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker on my list is the representative of Indonesia. I
invite him to take a seat at the Council table and to
make his statement.
Mr. Hidayat (Indonesia): My delegation would
like to congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption of the
presidency of the Council for the month of January and
to extend to you its sincere appreciation for organizing
this open meeting on one of our key concerns, children
and armed conflict. In our view, this meeting is an
indication of the Council's continued commitment to
the welfare of children in general and of its
determination to ensure their protection.
At this juncture, I would also like to express my
delegation's gratitude to the Secretary-General for his
report (S/2002/ 1299), and to his Special Representative
for Children and Armed Conflict for his efforts on this
issue. Particularly worthy of notice in the current report
are the commitments obtained for the protection and
well-being of children in conflict and post-conflict
situations.
Indonesia continues to be concerned about the
continued use of children in armed conflict around the
world. In this regard, we take particular notice of the
list annexed to the report, as requested by the Council
in its resolution 1379 (2001), of parties to armed
conflict that recruit or use children in violation of their
international legal obligations. We are disturbed at the
abuses that children suffer in camps, and at the general
suffering and deprivation that they endure because of
conflicts.
In that connection, it is also important to point
out the persisting problem of humanitarian access in
conflict situations. In the occupied Palestinian
territories, for example, the Secretary-General reports
that the conditions imposed by Israel - notably stricter
closures, curfews, roadblocks and checkpoints - have
created humanitarian problems including frequent
school closures and a drop in immunization levels. This
kind of avoidable inhumanity to society, especially to
children, must not be allowed to continue.
In the past, we have lent our national support to
international efforts at ensuring the protection of
children in such conflicts and at alleviating the
suffering of those who have been unfortunate enough
to find themselves in the midst of them. My delegation
has always seen these two aspects of the problem: on
the one hand, children are deployed as instruments in a
situation while, on the other, they are intended and
unintended victims.
Children who are involved in battle, whether they
are hurt or not, are victims, and there is not much of an
escape once the bullets, or the logistical demands of
conflict, take over. It is the responsibility of those
formulating international law within the multilateral
system to continue to adopt measures to limit
children's involvement in and exposure to conflict. The
continued recruitment of under-age children for the
purposes of conflict should not continue with impunity.
To respond to these concerns, the international
community possesses several international instruments,
such as the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the
Child, of which Indonesia is a signatory. That
Convention underlines the political, social, economic
and civil rights of children. Indonesia also supports the
Optional Protocol that strengthens the Convention by
calling for a minimum age of 18 for eligibility for
participation in hostilities. Unfortunately, in recent
conflicts the Convention and its Optional Protocol have
conveniently been ignored.
In this connection, another key international
document by which the international community has
tried to address this issue in recent times is "A world
fit for children" (General Assembly resolution S-27/2, annex), the outcome document of the landmark May
2002 special session of the General Assembly on
children. It calls on the world community to make the
world safer for children, and outlines the
responsibilities of nations and the measures they must
take in that regard. Among other things, it specifies an
assortment of responses to protect children from armed
conflict and impunity. We are of the opinion that it is a
thorough and strong document that, if implemented,
would go a long way towards resolving several issues
relating to the protection of children in conflict
situations.
With reference to post-conflict situations, it is
important to take a brief look at the example of what
the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) has
been able to achieve in Sierra Leone. In 2001, UNICEF
helped more than 3,600 child soldiers in Sierra Leone
to leave army life and rejoin their families. The
children obtained counselling, vocational training and
education towards reintegration into their communities.
We commend and support programmes of this nature,
not only those of UNICEF and other relevant United
Nations agencies, in conflict and post-conflict
situations where children have been a factor.
Similarly, my delegation stresses the importance
of enhancing the monitoring mechanisms spelled out in
resolution 1379 (2001). Since the adoption of that
resolution, we are pleased that the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflict, and other
relevant international agreements and conventions have
entered into force. We cannot afford to pay only lip
service to this very important matter, and must
therefore find ways of implementing these critical
international instruments. To that end, we congratulate
those States that are already making efforts to
harmonize their national legislation with available
international child rights standards.
As we have often said, the future of humanity
depends on children, and they must be protected
because that is the only protection that the future of
mankind has. We cannot have our children exposed to
violence so early in their lives without expecting them
to bear and carry insecurity, violence and hatred within
them, especially when they have also forfeited their
youth and the chance of a good education at such an
early stage of their lives.
While conflict itself should be avoided altogether,
children should not be dragged into it if it does arise. A
child should not have to carry a gun, find himself at the
receiving end of gunfire or be hurt by conflict. Rather
than celebrate minor moral victories, the international
community should focus its attention and evaluation on
the larger picture.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
representative of Indonesia for the kind words he
addressed to me.
The next speaker on my list is the representative
of Sierra Leone. I invite him to take a seat at the
Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Rowe (Sierra Leone): Mr. President, my
delegation would like to associate itself with the words
of welcome and congratulation extended to you by
previous speakers. We look forward to working with
you in your capacity as the President of the Security
Council and as the new Permanent Representative of
France.
Sierra Leone has no more child soldiers. We say
this not with a feeling of pride. We have no reason to
take pride in the fact that Sierra Leone is not named in
the Secretary-General's latest report (S/2002/ 1299)
among areas of conflict where children are still being
recruited and/or used as child soldiers. On the contrary,
we say Sierra Leone has no more child soldiers only
with a sense of relief; relief that our children, those
who survived the atrocious rebel war, are free at last
from the abominable practice of recruiting children to
kill and be killed.
As a country that has just emerged from a
prolonged and brutal armed conflict in which children
were both perpetrators and victims, we know from
experience the immediate and long-term consequences
of the abduction, drugging, training and deployment of
children for armed combat. Experience has also taught
us that urgent action must be taken to put an end to
such practices, first and foremost through the
disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of ex-
combatants.
In 1999 the Government of Sierra Leone insisted
that its peace agreement with the rebel movement the
Revolutionary United Front (RUF) must include an
appeal to the conscience of the parties to recognize that
the children of Sierra Leone, especially those affected
by the conflict, in View of their vulnerability, are
entitled to special care and protection consistent with
the provisions of the International Convention on the
Rights of the Child. The Government, for its part, also
pledged to accord particular attention to the issue of
child soldiers by mobilizing resources through the
Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-
General for Children and Armed Conflict, and through
the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and
other agencies, to address the special needs of these
children in the disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration (DDR) process.
I would like to pay tribute to the Special
Representative, Mr. Otunnu, and to Ms. Bellamy of
UNICEF for their untiring efforts on behalf of the
children of Sierra Leone. We would also like to
commend them for their statements this morning.
Sierra Leone has also learned from experience
that the problem of former child soldiers could be
addressed through the establishment of an oversight
institution for the welfare of children in a post-conflict
situation. Beyond the disarmament and demobilization
process, however, we have tried to ensure that the
welfare of children and the protection of their right to
develop in a peaceful environment are at the centre of
government policy-making and resource-allocation
strategies.
Our thanks again go to the Special Representative
of the Secretary-General, Mr. Otunnu. His ground-
breaking 15-point agenda for action for the children of
Sierra Leone paved the way for the establishment in
January last year of a statutory National Commission
for War-Affected Children. It is now the principal child
protection and advocacy mechanism in the country.
Although the scope of its work is relatively wide and
covers different categories of war-affected children, the
Commission is expected to address the special needs of
former child combatants.
My delegation takes note of the reference in the
Secretary-General's report to the risk we face in Sierra
Leone of losing thousands of former child combatants
to the conflict across the border in Liberia. This
underscores our concern that in the absence of
adequate resources for implementing the Government's
reintegration programme for ex-combatants, especially
the thousands of demobilized child ex-combatants,
those warlords will take advantage of the situation and
recruit them again into the killing circus that has
characterized the activities of the rebel movements in
the subregion. We therefore endorse wholeheartedly the
recommendation that the Security Council and Member
States should be urged to provide sustained and
adequate resources to the relevant organizations
engaged in implementing DDR programmes for
children.
My delegation strongly believes that the
establishment of international norms prescribing the
involvement of children in armed conflict, and strict
compliance with those norms, are important steps in
our collective effort to rid the world of this
unconscionable practice. My delegation shares the
view set out by the Secretary-General in his report that
the codification of international norms and standards
for the protection of children during conflict has made
an impressive contribution to that effort. Sierra Leone
has ratified the two Optional Protocols to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child. We have also
become a party to the African regional equivalent, the
Organization of African Unity and African Union
Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. Our
ratification of the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court is also a testimony to our commitment
to, among other things, the relevant provisions
concerning the recruitment and use of child soldiers,
and the mechanism of accountability for crimes
specific to children.
We also share the view of the Secretary-General
that the challenge today is to ensure their
implementation on the ground, that is, compliance with
these international norms. The list of violators
contained in his report is indeed an important step
forward in our efforts, as he puts it, "to induce
compliance with international child protection
obligations by parties to conflict" (S/2002/1299, para. 28).
However, my delegation believes - and we
would like to stress this point here - that we must also
recognize that rebels and other non-State insurgent
groups are not parties to those international instruments
on the involvement or use of children in armed
conflict. As we witnessed in Sierra Leone,
notwithstanding the commitments rebel movements
make in peace agreements, these forces, at least in the
West African subregion, account, in our view, for most
of the recorded abuses of international norms for the
protection of children in armed conflict. We recall here
the number of instances where the RUF rebel
movement reneged on peace and ceasefire agreements.
We observe that there are only four Governments
on the "name and shame" list annexed to the Secretary-
General's latest report. That of course does not mean
that we should downplay violations by States. The list
indicates clearly, as far as we are concerned, that ways
and means must be found for dealing more effectively
with the role of non-State actors in the recruitment and
use of child soldiers.
This brings my delegation to a related issue that
has been placed on the agenda of the Security Council:
the illegal trade and transfer of small arms and light
weapons. Many speakers referred to it this morning,
and Switzerland and other delegations also spoke about
it eloquently this afternoon.
The Sierra Leone delegation would like to take
this opportunity to reiterate once again its appeal to all
States, in particular manufacturers and their agents, to
ensure, including through appropriate legislation, that
these weapons do not get into the hands of rebel
movements and other non-State actors. Security
Council arms embargoes and travel restrictions against
rebel movements are very important - we recognize
that - but are certainly not enough, especially where
sanctions monitoring mechanisms do not exist or are
woefully ineffective.
Finally, based on the Sierra Leone experience, my
delegation would like to see in the draft resolution to
be adopted by the Security Council following its
discussion of the Secretary-General's report some
reference to the question of impunity. The Special
Court for Sierra Leone should be seen as an example of
the type of mechanism available to the international
community for addressing impunity, especially
impunity related to the recruitment of children to
commit heinous atrocities in conflict situations.
We feel that the Special Court could be regarded
as a court set up for our children's sake. As the
prosecutor, David Crane, said recently, the children of
Sierra Leone have suffered enough both as victims and
as perpetrators. The objective is to prosecute not
children, but the people, including those warlords, who
forced thousands of children to commit unspeakable
crimes.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
representative of Sierra Leone for the kind words he
addressed to my delegation.
The next speaker is the representative of
Slovenia. I invite him to take a seat tat the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Kim (Slovenia): Slovenia has already
associated itself with the statement made by the
representative of Greece on behalf of the European
Union and with the statement made by the
representative of Austria as Chair of the Human
Security Network, and we fully endorse both of them.
Since the issue of children and armed conflict is one of
particular importance for Slovenia, I would like to
highlight some points in our national capacity.
Let me first express our appreciation to you, Sir,
for having convened this meeting. We consider it
primarily to be an opportunity to review the progress
achieved and to identify further action to be taken.
Since the adoption of resolution 1261 (1999), the issue
of children and armed conflict has been firmly
established on the agenda of the Security Council, in
recognition of its importance for peace and security,
thus adding a new dimension to the discussions in this
body, which Slovenia firmly supports.
We are pleased to see that a number of significant
developments were achieved in the past year,
particularly in the normative domain, such as the entry
into force of the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court. Slovenia ratified the Rome Statute in
December 2001, and we are looking forward to the
constitution of the new Court in March this year.
Almost a year ago, the Optional Protocol on the
involvement of children in armed conflict entered into
force, and it is encouraging to note the growing
acceptance of this new instrument. Slovenia will ratify
it in the very near future.
The special session of the General Assembly on
children, held last May, and the adoption of the
outcome document, "A world fit for children"
reaffirmed our joint commitment to protect children
during armed conflict, in accordance with international
humanitarian and human rights law. This provides the
necessary political, as well as legal frameworks, to
combat the abuse of children in armed conflict. We call
on all Member States and all other parties in conflict to
fully implement or respect their provisions, and
especially to act against impunity for all crimes
committed against children.
Slovenia welcomes the most recent report of the
Secretary-General on children and armed conflict. We
would like to express our sincere appreciation of and
support for Special Representative Olara Otunnu and
his Office for their work in this respect. This is the first
time that parties recruiting and using child soldiers
have been specifically identified, giving us a clear
picture of who the perpetrators of crimes against
children really are. The report and the annex list
represent a very clear sign that the international
community is no longer ready to tolerate abuses of
children in conflict situations. They also represent a
concrete contribution to the raising of global awareness
on this issue. Slovenia shares the views expressed that
the report should be the first step towards drawing up
an integral list of all parties using children, not only
those involved in situations on the Security Council's
agenda.
Austria, on behalf of the Human Security
Network, presented a set of specific recommendations
to the Council on how to further address this issue, and
Slovenia fully supports those recommendations. I
should like just to recall the need to regularly update
the list, to extend it by including situations that are not
on the Security Council's agenda and to ensure that the
issue of war-affected children is taken fully into
account in all of its decisions on peacemaking,
peacekeeping and peace-building operations.
Another positive development this year is the
beginning of the deployment of child protection
advisers in some United Nations peace operations. We
concur with the Secretary-General and his Special
Representative that the deployment of such advisers in
each United Nations peace operation is highly
desirable.
In addition to efforts undertaken globally,
regional and interregional action is needed. We greatly
appreciate the opportunity to share our views with the
like-minded countries of the Human Security Network.
As pointed out by Austria, the Network believes that it
can significantly contribute to the global debate on the
issue, as well as improve the situation in our respective
regions through various concrete activities.
Being aware of the importance of children for the
future and for the prosperity of our societies, Slovenia
decided several years ago to contribute to the recovery
of South-Eastern Europe by establishing an institution
to assist war-affected children - the Regional Centre
for the Psychosocial Well-being of Children, which is
also called "Together". The basic aim of the Centre is
to strengthen local structures in the field of child care,
to develop mechanisms for their psycho-social
protection and to empower war-affected children,
remaining in the region even after international
assistance has been withdrawn. We would like to thank
all donors and to invite all other countries and
institutions to work with us to improve the situation of
war-affected children in South-Eastern Europe.
Another of Slovenia's initiatives contributing to
the safety of children in the region of South-Eastern
Europe is in the area of anti-personnel mines and
demining - the work conducted by the Slovenia-based
International Trust Fund for Demining and Mine
Victim Assistance.
The report of the Secretary-General points out
that little progress has been made regarding efforts to
sever the link between the proliferation and widespread
use of small arms and light weapons and the related
victimization of children. In this regard, I am pleased
to inform the Security Council that a United Nations
subregional conference on the illicit trade in small arms
and light weapons in all its aspects, co-organized by
the United Nations and Slovenia, will be held in
Slovenia in March this year. We hope that the
conference will contribute to reducing the illicit trade
in small arms and light weapons and its negative
impact, including its impact on children, in the region
of South-Eastern Europe.
In conclusion, allow me to reassure you,
Mr. President, that Slovenia fully supports all
endeavours of the Office of the Special Representative,
the United Nations Children's Fund and other United
Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations
in this field. We encourage continuous and meaningful
dialogue and cooperation among all of us, with the aim
of alleviating the plight of children affected by armed
conflict.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Myanmar. I invite him to take a seat at the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Swe (Myanmar): In congratulating you, Sir,
on your assumption of the presidency of the Council, I
would also like to thank you for convening a public
meeting on children and armed conflict. The situation
of children in armed conflict is heart-wrenching. As the
Secretary-General's report pointed out, war displaces
families and communities, and children are at risk of
exploitation and forcible recruitment. This underscores
the fact that peace and stability are important, not only
for the development of the country concerned but also
for the welfare of its population, particularly women
and children, which are the most vulnerable groups in
conflict situations.
As reflected in the Secretary-General's report,
impressive gains have been made in codifying
international norms and standards for the protection
and well-being of children. We share the opinion that
there is a need to promote and disseminate these norms
and standards and to raise awareness about them on the
ground.
We take satisfaction from the fact that, in
preparing the list, the Secretary-General was guided by
resolution 1379 (2001). We note, however, that the
report departed from its mandate when it made
reference, under situations of concern not included in
the list, to a number of countries, including Myanmar.
We particularly regret that in addition to the armed
insurgent groups in Myanmar, the national armed
forces were also referred to - this despite the fact that
there is no credible evidence of the use and recruitment
of children by the Myanmar Armed Forces.
In that regard, I share the view expressed this
morning by one Council member about the need for
verification and checking the validity of information
before it is presented to the Security Council. Nor
should the issue of protection of children be
politicized. The allegation made regarding my country
is the result of interviewing 20 or so insurgents inside a
neighbouring country. Additionally, the situation in
Myanmar is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a
threat to international peace and security.
The Myanmar armed forces is an all-volunteer
army. Those entering military service do so of their
own free will. Under the Myanmar Defence Services
Act of 1974 and War Office Council Instruction 13/73,
a person cannot enlist in the armed forces until he has
attained the age of 18. There is neither a draft system
nor forced conscription by the Government of
Myanmar.
The Special Rapporteur of the Commission on
Human Rights, who had visited Myanmar four times,
expressed concern in his report over:
"abuses of civilians and refugees on the part of
armed opposition groups, notably the Karenni
National Liberation Army, which has been
accused of forced conscription of male villagers,
including under-age youths". (A/57/290, para. 19)
It is a practice of armed insurgent groups in
Myanmar to recruit and abuse child soldiers. That was
brought to the wide attention of the international
community in 2000, when some members of a splinter
insurgent group, styling themselves as God's Army,
took over a hospital in Ratchaburi, in Thailand, taking
700 people hostage. The self-styled God's Army is an
insurgent group led by two 10-year-old twins, Johnny
and Luther Htoo.
We share the view of many delegations that the
best way of protecting children in armed conflict lies in
conflict prevention and resolution. Myanmar regained
its independence in January 1948. In a matter of
months, it had to face the challenge of insurgencies by
various armed groups. Until recently, there were 18
armed insurgent groups in the country, as well as a
narco-trafficking armed group.
For over 40 years, Myanmar had to suffer the
scourge of insurgency. The ethnic insurgencies which
had existed in Myanmar since its independence were
contained and rolled back only in recent years through
the painstaking efforts of the Government. As a result,
17 armed ethnic insurgent groups have participated in
the exchange of arms for peace programme. They are
now actively engaged in development activities in their
respective regions, together with the Government.
Apart from a splinter armed group of narco-traffickers,
only one ethnic insurgent group, the Kayin National
Union (KNU), remains to return to the fold, and the
Government continues to extend an olive branch to this
group.
For the first time in nearly half a century, the
armed conflict that plagued Myanmar has ceased in all
parts of the country with the exception of a few border
areas. The Special Rapporteur on human rights, in
commending the achievement of the ceasefire
agreements by the Government with 17 armed ethnic
groups, stated in his report: "After decades of fear,
insecurity and widespread violence the first dividend
of the ceasefire agreements is peace and the second is
some development" (ibid., para. 12).
The Government is promoting a culture of peace.
We are fully aware that, in any conflict situation,
children are among the most vulnerable groups. We
share the determination to give the fullest attention to
the question of protection of children in armed conflict.
The Secretary-General's report has pointed out
that education has also been a casualty of war. In
Myanmar, since civil insurgency has effectively been
overcome in nearly all parts of the country, the
Government has been able to concentrate its efforts on
development of the areas where fighting raged for over
four decades. In 1992, the Government set up a
separate ministry for that purpose and was able to bring
development to those areas. It has built hospitals, roads
and bridges in these border areas. From 1988-1989 to
1998-1999, in a span of 10 years, it built more than 350
schools in the former insurgent-held areas. The
Government has now been able to provide child
immunization for all children nationwide. We are able
to conduct extensive immunization programmes in the
remote areas.
It is a time-honoured tradition in Myanmar to
place special emphasis on the overall development of
children and to ensure their protection, upbringing and
development. In bringing about peace and stability, we
endeavour to provide the children with a peaceful and
developed world so that they will have a secure and
enabling environment to develop their individual
capabilities.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Colombia. I invite him to take a seat at the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Valdivieso (Colombia) (spoke in Spanish): I
am pleased, Sir, to see you representing France and
presiding over this Security Council meeting devoted
to an item that connects two important aspects of
United Nations action in the world: the maintenance of
international peace and the protection of children.
My delegation is grateful for the presentations
made at the beginning of the meeting by the Secretary-
General, by his Special Representative for Children
and Armed Conflict, Mr. Olara Otunnu, and by the
Executive Director of the United Nations Children's
Fund (UNICEF), Ms. Carol Bellamy. We acknowledge
the commitment of these latter two officials in ensuring
that peacekeeping operations focus on the special needs
of children in conflict situations.
The needs of children are one aspect of the broad
actions required to protect civilians in armed conflict.
In this respect, I would like to recall that in the
statement issued on 20 December 2002 on the
protection of civilians in armed conflicts
(S/PRST/2002/41), the Council encouraged United
Nations agencies to cooperate with Member States in
formulating a comprehensive, coherent and action-
oriented approach to the protection of civilians in
armed conflict.
The report of the Secretary-General
(S/2002/1299), which is the basis for this debate,
highlighted several special needs of children in conflict
situations. It referred, among other things, to juvenile
justice, education on the risks of landmines, and care
for internally displaced children and for girls who are
exposed to sexual abuse. Therefore, we encourage
Council members to bear those needs clearly in mind
when considering conflicts that are included in their
programme of work.
The problem of child soldiers is so important that
it has captured the attention of agencies, such as the
World Bank, which in the past were quite remote from
this topic. The report's list of military forces and rebel
groups that recruit children alerts us to the need to
resolve these conflicts and to counter the world trade in
small arms and light weapons.
We call on the Council to consider establishing
the origin of arms that are used by groups that recruit
minors, and we call, in particular, on arms-exporting
countries, for greater controls.
We regret the fact that many rebel groups within
Colombia continue to recruit and kidnap children in
order to carry out their attacks against society. The
Government of Colombia, in accordance with its
accession to international conventions - in particular
to the relevant Optional Protocol to the Convention on
the Rights of the Child - does not recruit those
younger than 18 in its military forces. We encourage
other States to accede to the Protocol and to respect
this limit on compulsory recruitment and on the
participation of minors in combat.
As this is my last official function as
representative of Colombia to the United Nations, I
should like to thank you, Mr. President, for the
opportunity to participate in this debate. I assure you
that it will guide my personal action in this area in the
coming years. In addition, I thank my colleagues of the
countries members of the Security Council for the
friendship and cooperation that they extended to me
during Colombia's two years on the Council, which
concluded just a few days ago. Moreover, I should like
to wish the new members every success in their work
on behalf of international peace.
The President (spoke in French): I should like to
take this opportunity, on behalf of the members of the
Security Council, to say that we regret the departure of
the Permanent Representative of Colombia, to thank
him for his very valuable contribution to the Council's
work over the past two years, and warmly to wish him
every success in his future endeavours.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Malawi. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Lamba (Malawi): Let me begin by saying
that I shall present what one might call a summary in
the interests of time. Copies of my complete statement
have been deposited with the conference officers.
I should like to join preceding speakers in
congratulating you, Sir, on assuming the presidency of
this important organ of the United Nations and in
thanking you and the Security Council for organizing
this important debate to highlight the plight of children
in conflict situations. My delegation would also like to
congratulate the Secretary-General on his lucid and
candid report on children and armed conflict
(S/2002/1299), which forms the substance of this
debate. Special acknowledgement also goes to the
excellent presentations by the Special Representative
of the Secretary-General, Mr. Olara Otunnu, and by the
Executive Director of the United Nations Children's
Fund, Ms. Carol Bellamy. The information that has
been provided will undoubtedly lead to soul-searching
with regard to the strategies needed for the protection
of children, especially in armed conflicts, but also for
the necessary post-conflict care. My delegation is
satisfied with the approach aimed at monitoring and
reporting the treatment of children through the
codification of international norms and standards to
secure maximum protection.
Malawi cannot claim much experience in armed
conflict, and the problem of children now under
discussion might be considered rather peripheral on
Malawi's socio-economic agenda. However, the
welfare of children must form the central feature of any
nation's socio-economic planning. Malawi has
supported all actions designed to create an improved
environment for our children's realization of their full
physical, emotional and intellectual potential. All
regional and international protocols for children have
been accorded Malawi's support.
Malawi considers imperative the promotion of
any action that alleviates children's suffering and
deprivation, which negatively affect their hope for a
good future. Although Malawi may not be engaged in
conflict or warfare, it - like many other African
countries - is engaged in a more subtle war against
the HIV/AIDS pandemic, which has created
approximately 600,000 orphans, of whom no less than
one fifth were born already infected with HIV and
therefore face a bleak future in an environment
blighted by excessive poverty.
The Malawi Government has placed children high
on its development agenda, and its vigorous
intervention in child development - which covers
nutrition, water and sanitation, psycho-social care,
education and health - demonstrates its seriousness in
addressing the welfare of children. Malawi ratified the
Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1991, and the
Government is working in collaboration with the
Committee on the Rights of the Child to assiduously
monitor the implementation of the Convention.
Other concrete measures taken by the
Government include the establishment, in 1999, of a
children's rights unit within the Malawi Human Rights
Commission to protect children from abuse, violence
and exploitation. The Malawi Law Commission has
embarked on a review of existing legislation to bring it
into conformity with international human rights
standards, including those for children. Financial and
technical assistance will be needed here to promote the
administration of juvenile justice and human rights
education. Malawi is also a signatory to all
International Labour Organization protocols, and
national legislation has been enacted to regulate the
minimum age of employment. The United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF) has always proved to be an
ardent partner in the improvement of the state of
Malawi's children.
Our achievements today must contribute to a
positive and hopeful future for our children. That is
why my delegation commends the Secretary-General's
report for exposing and providing heightened
awareness of the plight of children created by a
senseless adult world. My delegation fully endorses all
measures proposed and adopted for the creation of a
world fit for children and all actions taken under
international humanitarian and human rights law to
induce compliance by the perpetrators of crimes
against children.
Therefore, my delegation hopes for systematic
international compliance, on the part of both States
parties and insurgent armed groups, with two
instruments: the Optional Protocol to the Convention
on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of
children in armed conflict and the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. In the report, Malawi is
pleased to note the United Nations offer of technical
and legal assistance in the area of ensuring children's
rights.
In conflict regions, no child can be safe, whether
that child is in the fighting ranks or in a devastated
home environment. The trauma experienced by
children in conflict remains with them long afterwards.
Malawi therefore endorses the establishment of child
protection advisers in affected countries, such as
Angola, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of
Congo, to collaborate with other stakeholders, such as
UNICEF and Governments.
Indeed, children's rights must be highlighted on
the United Nations agenda of peacemaking,
peacekeeping and peace-building, with child protection
adequately integrated into that agenda. It is our hope
that the draft guidelines formulated by the Department
of Peacekeeping Operations and the Department of
Political Affairs will make an effective contribution to
the promotion of effective child protection. The
proposed comprehensive child protection training to
supervise the conduct of staff towards children in
mission areas stands out as a necessary initiative that
deserves unqualified support. Equally important is the
suggested inclusion of landmine risk education
programmes and rehabilitation of child victims of
mines.
The exploitation of children as forced labour to
extract natural resources in various countries, including
the Democratic Republic of the Congo, only
emphasizes the inhuman tragedy faced by displaced
children. A childhood spent in refugee camps
encounters enormous challenges. Indeed, apart from
forced labour, the recruitment of children by armed
forces and by other groups deprives them of the right to
education, to proper health care, to development and,
above all, to choices. A refugee camp in a foreign
country creates an even more complicated situation for
children. Malawi fully supports the work of the Office
of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees, whose work and intervention brings hope to
the many suffering children.
The horrible experiences of girls and women in
armed conflicts present a nemesis to any norms of
civilization and form a topic deserving urgent action.
The substantial claims of sexual exploitation involving
rape, forced recruitment, abduction and trafficking all
serve as condemning testimony to the absence of
commitment to practical support for girls' welfare. On
a different occasion in the United Nations, Malawi
expressed total condemnation of the despicable sexual
exploitation of girls in conflict zones not only by
armed forces, but, more disturbingly, by aid workers
and peacekeepers. Malawi notes with satisfaction the
Plan of Action of the Inter-Agency Standing
Committee's Task Force on Protection from Sexual
Exploitation and Abuse in Humanitarian Crises, the
strict implementation of which should make a
significant difference and contribution towards the
protection of girls from sexual exploitation.
My delegation would like to pay special tribute to
the Secretary-General for including in his report lists of
people and States involved in the violation of the legal
and human rights of children who find themselves
subjected to various indignities and deprivation. The
list should create a time for reflection over the
important obligation of international child protection
through unquestionable compliance with international
agreements and protocols. Malawi will support any
Security Council actions with respect to States and
organizations listed in the report. Children's rights
deserve respect and their flagrant violation with
impunity should not be tolerated and must be addressed
through recourse to punitive measures, such as tough
sanctions.
Finally, the field visits of the Special
Representative have demonstrated the crucial
importance of such an approach to verify and elucidate
the war-affected child's situation in conflict zones.
Such visits, which need to be encouraged, give the
Special Representative a visual picture of the extent of
the problem. The data so competently collected
enriches our comprehension of the child's predicament.
As the Security Council deliberates the problems
facing the child in conflict areas, it is Malawi's strong
plea that children facing other crises, such as
HIV/AIDS, should feature in the Special
Representative's future itinerary. For example, Malawi,
where the pandemic has created untold misery for
children, would benefit from a proactive visit by the
Special Representative to assess the efficacy of the
interventions and child-protection measures currently
in place and subsequently to advise appropriately.
My delegation would like to conclude this
statement by once again thanking the Secretary-
General for submitting a landmark report on children,
which will challenge the deliberations of the Security
Council. If the mishandled child, who holds the future,
cannot be considered a security issue, what can? If we
cannot demonstrate concern for the child now, who will
and when? There is no time to stand idle and watch.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Liechtenstein. I invite him to take a seat at the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Wenaweser (Liechtenstein) (spoke in French): At the outset, I should like to thank you, Sir,
for convening this meeting on a subject to which we
attach the highest importance.
(spoke in English)
Liechtenstein welcomes action by the Security
Council on the issue of children and armed conflict
and, in particular, the open debates, the products of
which have been instrumental in creating a normative
framework for the protection of children affected by
armed conflict. Much to our satisfaction, the special
session on children last year also placed strong
emphasis on this topic.
As far as standard-setting is concerned, the year
2002 was a good one for children. Two new legal
instruments entered into force: the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale
of children, child prostitution and child pornography
and the Optional Protocol on the involvement of
children in armed conflict. Liechtenstein has signed
both of these Protocols and is preparing to ratify them.
Another step forward - an historic step indeed - was
the entry into force of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. The Statute, among other
things, provides for the better protection of children,
especially but not exclusively in times of armed
conflict. The inclusion of the recruitment and use by all
parties to a conflict of children under the age of 15 in
conflicts of both an international and non-international
character as a war crime is of special importance in this
respect.
Success in standard-setting must not give us
cause for complacency - quite to the contrary. While
the existing standards are high, the picture continues to
be very grim when it comes to their application. The
rights of millions of children around the world continue
to be violated in numerous and brutal ways. Children
affected by armed conflict, with all its manifold and
devastating consequences, are in the worst situation.
We therefore agree with the Special Representative on
Children and Armed Conflict that we must move with
resolve into an era of application, which was also one
of the lessons we drew from last year's special session
on children.
In the implementation of these existing norms,
the Security Council can play a central role. The
creation of a list of parties to conflicts on the Council's
agenda that continue to recruit or use child soldiers is
one measure through which to make progress in
assuring compliance with international obligations. The
list should be expanded to cover parties to conflicts in
a global manner, not only in situations on the agenda of
the Council. We welcome such practical steps and hope
that the Council will again agree on a strong response
to the report before us and thus ensure a follow-up
based on the recommendations contained in the report.
We welcome the report before the Council and its
emphasis on systematically integrating child protection
objectives into the mandates of peace operations,
including through the deployment of child protection
advisers and special training for peacekeeping
personnel. Given the importance of the participation of
children in accordance with the letter and spirit of the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, children must
be given a voice, in particular in the process of post-
conflict peace-building, rather than merely having their
best interests represented by others.
Liechtenstein has supported the work of the
Special Representative, Mr. Olara Otunnu, right from
the inception of his mandate. His advocacy on behalf
of children in armed conflict over the past six years has
been heard widely and proven effective. Worldwide
awareness of children and the ways in which they are
affected by armed conflict is increasing. In order to
enhance the application of the legal instruments I
referred to at the outset of my statement, more needs to
be done to make these achievements better known.
Advocacy and creating awareness help to broaden
the base of support and to get more stakeholders
involved. In this context, the work and involvement of
non-governmental organizations and civil society
groups can be instrumental, especially in highlighting
different aspects of the plight of children affected by
armed conflict. In this context, we have taken note with
great interest of two reports: first, the "1379 Report" of
the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers and,
secondly, the study on the voices of girl child soldiers
presented by the Quaker United Nations Office.
The situation of the girl child is one aspect that
requires our special attention in order to effectively
protect the rights and well-being of children affected
by armed conflicts. Those conflicts have manifold and
complex consequences for all children, but specific
forms of victimization are often added to the plight of
girls and women. Rape, abduction, sexual enslavement
and trafficking are some of the crimes perpetrated
against female victims in particular. What is
characteristic of such crimes is their traumatic nature
and long-term effects. One figure may illustrate this
point: two out of three women and girls raped during
the 1994 genocide in Rwanda have reportedly tested
positive for HIV/AIDS. It is therefore no exaggeration
to say that the genocide continues in a silent way. True
stability and security cannot be re-established for long
after an armed conflict has subsided, because of the
specific crimes inflicted especially upon women and
girls.
All of that is to say that the international
community would be well advised to address very
specific issues and details regarding children affected
by armed conflict. As I indicated at the outset, it does
not suffice to adopt broad norms and standards. The
effects of armed conflicts on children, the different
forms of child labour and sexual exploitation and the
resulting special vulnerability of children to the
HIV/AIDS pandemic stand out as areas where
concerted national and international action is a
prerequisite for successful and durable solutions. All
these issues constitute large-scale crises that can be
addressed only through specific and coordinated action
by all of us.
Nobody must be allowed to deprive children of
both their childhood and their future. By permitting
this we would be violating a moral imperative we all
hold dear. But, moreover, we would not only be
destroying the future of individual children but also the
collective future of the countries concerned.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. I invite him to take
a seat at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Ileka (Democratic Republic of the Congo) (spoke in French): I have the pleasant duty of
expressing my delegation's satisfaction at seeing the
representative of France presiding over the Security
Council as we begin the year. My country enjoys
excellent relations with France, relations that are based
on mutual trust and respect. Allow me also,
Mr. President, to pay tribute to your predecessor, the
representative of Colombia. I commend him for the
skill and ability with which he discharged his difficult
tasks during his presidency last month.
I would like to congratulate Angola, Chile,
Germany, Pakistan and Spain on becoming members of
the Council. I would also like to pay well-deserved
tribute to the outgoing members. We are very grateful
to them for their efforts, in particular with regard to the
search for peace in my country.
Lastly, I would like to thank you, Mr. President,
for having convened this meeting of the Security
Council. I also express my gratitude for the Secretary-
General's important report on children and armed
conflict (S/2002/1299), which Special Representative
Olara Otunnu presented this morning with his usual
eloquence. I also thank Ms. Carol Bellamy, Executive
Director of the United Nations Children's Fund
(UNICEF), for her important statement.
With regard to the item under consideration, I
would like to remind the Council that problems
pertaining to the protection of children are central to
my Government's primary concerns. That concern is
reflected, for example, in the existence of an
institutional and legal framework to guarantee the
rights of children. Despite the continuing financial
difficulties and war, my Government has reacted
positively to all the recommendations relating to the
protection of children that are contained in the relevant
resolutions of the Security Council, including
resolution 1325 (2000) on the subject of women and
peace and security. Furthermore, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo is party to the major
international instruments on the protection of the rights
of the child, including the Convention on the Rights of
the Child and its Optional Protocols on the
involvement of children in armed conflict and on the
sale of children, child prostitution and child
pornography, the African Charter on the Rights and
Welfare of the Child, International Labour
Organization (ILO) Convention No. 138 - concerning
the minimum age for employment - and No. 182 -
on the elimination of the worst forms of child labour,
and, of course, the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court (ICC). The implementation of the
Rome Statute is of great importance to my
Government, which expended great effort to facilitate
its entry into force, which took place on 1 July 2002.
This treaty includes an important provision to protect
the rights of children, making it a war crime to
conscript children under the age of 15 years into
national armed forces.
The Council should also recall that my
Government has been greatly involved in the process of
protecting children, including through the
promulgation of its Decree-Law No. 66, of 9 June
2000, which dealt with the demobilization and
reintegration of vulnerable groups in armed forces.
That political will has been reflected in the
establishment of an appropriate structure, the National
Bureau for Demobilization and Reintegration
(BUNADER), which is charged with following up and
implementing the decree-law in partnership with
UNICEF, whose valuable work is greatly appreciated.
Since 1997, my Government has been aware of
the urgency of the need to end the presence of child
soldiers known as kadogo in the Congolese armed
forces. Since that time, my Government has developed
several programmes to demobilize child soldiers. Most
of those programmes required multilateral support, in
particular through the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) and the Human Rights Field
Office in Kinshasa. Other programmes required
bilateral assistance.
While today we welcome the sincere cooperation
and partnership that has developed between my
Government and the United Nations system as a whole,
as well as the efforts under way to end this deplorable
situation and fully implement norms and principles on
the rights of the child and on their protection, we must
nevertheless recognize that, at the time, the response of
the United Nations, the international community and
donor countries did not meet our expectations. Reasons
having to do with security, inaccessibility and, frankly,
a lack of confidence in the capacity and the will of my
Government to implement its policies to protect the
rights of the child resulted in the United Nations being
very late in providing support to my Government with
regard to formulating appropriate policies to protect
children in armed conflict and implementing
initiatives, particularly outreach initiatives and those
aimed at raising awareness.
Nevertheless - pursuant to the relevant
provisions of resolution 1261 (1999) of 25 August
1999, in which the Security Council called upon States
and the relevant parts of the United Nations system to
intensify their efforts to end the recruitment and use of
children in armed conflict - I would like to reaffirm to
the Council that the Democratic Republic of the Congo
has ended the enlistment of children in the Congolese
armed forces. That is in contrast to the behaviour of the
armed groups that hold sway in occupied provinces,
which continue to employ child soldiers in the theatre
of military operations. A process of demobilization for
child soldiers is now taking place under the supervision
of BUNADER and UNICEF. However, the future of
those soldiers continues to be of major concern and to
pose an immense problem.
When one takes into account the fact that serious
acts of banditry, particularly in Kinshasa, are being
carried out by armed young people, one has to wonder
about the wisdom of launching these young people into
the world without any financial incentives or viable
possibilities to reintegrate into society, especially as we
are dealing with young people in their prime who know
how to handle weapons. This phenomenon represents a
time bomb for the entire Congolese society, as well as a
real problem that the United Nations is tackling very
timidly and one that the Government alone cannot
address due to a lack of funds. It is important that steps
be taken not only immediately but also through the
implementation of chapter VI of the comprehensive,
inclusive agreement on the transition in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, relating to the training of our
national army.
We must all take concrete action very quickly.
Paragraph 55 of the report of the Secretary-General
under consideration (S/2002/ 1299) mentions a
commitment by the World Bank and donor countries to
support a regional multi-country demobilization and
reintegration programme for the entire Great Lakes
region. To us, such a commitment still seems to be a
long way off.
Last Thursday, France made 1 million euros
available to the United Nations Development
Programme. Of that amount, 200,000 euros are
immediately available for a programme to return to
civilian life foreign ex-combatants located in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. France's
contribution, following a contribution of 2 million
euros to the funds of the World Bank, gives France the
leading rank in support for the disarmament,
demobilization, repatriation, resettlement and
reintegration programme of United Nations
Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo (MONUC). That will greatly assist the
return of foreign ex-combatants - including the child
soldiers among them - to their countries of origin and
their families and homes.
Furthermore, implementing the relevant
provisions of resolutions 1314 (2000) and 1379 (2001),
MONUC has established child protection units. But
given the proliferation of armed groups and their
dispersion, and given the size of our national territory,
one might question their effectiveness and advocate a
substantial increase in the number of their personnel
within MONUC so that they can be more effective.
The international community is also called on to
help the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the
implementation by the Government and the future
transition authorities of the relevant recommendations
made by the delegates to the inter-Congolese dialogue.
The war of aggression that has raged in my
country for four years now, in violation of the United
Nations Charter, has not only given rise to the
phenomenon of child soldiers, whose forced
recruitment continues in the occupied provinces. For
children, this war has brought a succession of miseries,
of which they are the first victims. Thousands of them
survive, marginalized throughout the country, cut off
from society and their own families, living in the
streets alone or in groups, sexually exploited and
abused, breaking the law, without protection or future.
This war of aggression has also led to the forced,
brutal and tragic displacement of populations within
the borders of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
and has forced many Congolese into exile in
neighbouring countries. It has also encouraged all
kinds of violations of fundamental human rights,
particularly those related to the physical integrity of
women and children.
My delegation wishes to express my
Government's concern at the events currently taking
place in the east, in Uvira, and further north, in Beni,
Mambasa, Bunia, Kilo, Mongwalu and Mahagi. A
major humanitarian crisis has been created, especially
due to the forced displacement of thousands of people,
which has been confirmed by MONUC. Purely
commercial reasons are at the base of this upsurge in
tension, in which, through opposing Congolese
factions, Ugandan generals and Rwandan businessmen
equally attempt to gain control of the goldmines of
Kilo-Moto and of the Mongwalu area.
My Government denounces the delaying tactics
employed by Rwanda and Uganda, as well as their
manoeuvring to prolong the war in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo. Those two countries, after
signing agreements with my country, were quick to
incite new rebellions and create new warlords. Uganda
created the Union des patriotes congolais (UPC) -
headed by Mr. Thomas Lubanga, a notorious hostage-
taker and known criminal - which is not a signatory
of the Pretoria Agreement. For its part, Rwanda has
given the present Governor of Nord-Kivu, Mr. Serufuli,
responsibility for leading a militia of almost 20,000
men, essentially Hutus released from the prisons of
Rwanda by the Kigali Government, with the mission of
sowing terror, looting and committing massacres
among the civilian population.
My Government expresses its dismay at
information reporting widespread cases of looting and
mass rape of women and girls and summary and
extrajudicial executions perpetrated by the Mouvement
pour le liberation du Congo (MLC) and its ally, the
Rassemblement congolais pour la democratie-National
(RCD-N), as well as by the UPC.
My Government is scandalized by the discovery
of mass graves in Mambasa, where violent clashes
continue between, on the one side, the troops of the
Rassemblement congolais pour la democratie -
Mouvement de liberation (RCD-ML) and on the other,
the troops of the RCD-N, in coalition with the MLC.
My Government is shocked at the allegations
made by representatives of the Catholic Church and
non-governmental organizations for the defence of
human rights alleging acts of cannibalism by soldiers
of the MLC and the RCD-N, principally and
specifically targeting pygmy populations and the
Nande people. My Government awaits the conclusions
of the investigation carried out by the United Nations
and hopes that those conclusions will be made public
so that light will be shed on that indescribable act of
terror and those dreadful events. If that unimaginable
barbaric savagery turns out to be true, my Government
would ask the Security Council to take against the
alleged perpetrators, authors and those responsible all
measures authorized under the Charter of the United
Nations in order to stop those atrocities and crimes,
which now fall within the purview of the International
Criminal Court.
In conclusion, my Government appeals to all our
international, regional and subregional partners to help
us carry out our programme to promote and to protect
the rights of children. There is an urgent need to renew
international commitments to make children a priority
so that we do not waste the most precious human
resource in the world and to build a stable and
productive society. The future of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo lies in the well-being of its
children. Investing in children today will ensure peace,
stability, security, democracy and sustainable
development for present and future generations.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
representative of the Democratic Republic of the
Congo for his kind words addressed to my country.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Burundi. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Nteturuye (Burundi) (spoke in French): My
delegation is sincerely pleased to see you, Sir,
presiding over the work of the Security Council for the
first time since you assumed your new duties. We wish
you every success in your mission. How fortunate that
the first public meeting of the Council over which you
are presiding is dedicated to the situation of children in
armed conflicts, a subject of utmost importance and
one to which France has always given special attention.
I also congratulate the new members of the Security
Council and wish them every success in their noble
task.
I would like to welcome the presence among us
of our brother Mr. Olara Otunnu, who has made such
great efforts to raise the awareness of the international
community and mobilize it to assist children, whose
innocence is brutalized by the belligerents of the
conflicts currently raging throughout the world.
The report of the Secretary-General
(S/2002/1299) before us is extremely clear on the
suffering of children in conflicts and on the proposed
approaches for a solution, especially through the
implementation of international conventions that
already exist or are in the process of being adopted.
Burundi is mentioned in the report, in which the
principal belligerents - the Government, the rebels of
the Front pour la defense de la democratic (FDD) and
of the Parti pour la liberation du peuple hutu/Forces
nationales pour la liberation (PALIPEHUTU/FNL) -
are accused of using child soldiers in their conflict.
I should like to recall here that the war that has
been raging in Burundi since 1993 has particularly
affected the vulnerable populations, including children.
They are the ones who suffer most from diseases
related to the poor hygiene and other negative
conditions prevailing in camps for internally displaced
persons and refugees. They also suffer most from poor
nutrition and food shortages; the destruction or closing
of schools, health clinics and hospitals; and from the
many horrors of war. The phenomenon of street
children in urban areas - in Burundi and elsewhere -
is a shocking reality of civil war in our States.
The task of rehabilitating children therefore is a
multidimensional one, as indicated by international
norms to protect children in situations of conflict.
In Burundi, there is, however, a glimmer of hope
for the entire population, and in particular for children.
That hope was kindled by the signing of the Arusha
Peace Agreement in August 2000 and, more recently,
by the signing of a ceasefire between the Transitional
Government and the three armed factions. We hope that
the armed group that has remained outside of this peace
process - the PALIPEHUTU/FNL - will soon join it.
The Arusha Peace Agreement makes explicit
reference to the rehabilitation of the educational and
health sectors for the benefit of children, and there are
plans to introduce peace education and tolerance
programmes into school curricula.
With respect to child soldiers, the Peace
Agreement, as well as the ceasefire agreement signed
on 2 December 2002 at Arusha with the FDD armed
group, both define the ceasefire as, inter alia, the
cessation of all acts of violence against the population
as well as an end to the use of child soldiers and to
sexual violence.
The ceasefire agreement also specified in the
annex - which is an integral part of the agreement -
that the question of child soldiers is one of the
technical issues still to be negotiated between the
Government and the FDD, and that the Government
and the rebel groups must agree on a common solution.
Such a solution can be found in the disarmament,
demobilization, reintegration and repatriation or
resettlement programme, which is the most important
part of the ceasefire agreement, and for which,
thankfully, the international community has planned
substantial funding, within the framework of a possible
United Nations peacekeeping mission in Burundi.
As concerns the Government, we recognize the
existence of child soldiers recruited on a voluntary
basis due to a lack of other options following
unsuccessful primary schooling. In 1989 we signed the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, and then, in
2001, the Optional Protocol to that Convention on the
involvement of children in armed conflict. Ratification
proceedings are under way. We have already set up,
jointly with the United Nations Children's Fund, a
programme for the demobilization of child soldiers,
and a census of these children is under way.
However, with respect to the armed groups, the
situation is quite distressing, because, following the
signing of the ceasefire agreement on 2 December
2002, the FDD rebels carried out a forced mass
recruitment of young schoolchildren and students,
promising them the world, including military ranks and
large sums of money, which the international
community was to give them if some of them were to
be demobilized some day. This attitude should be
condemned by the Security Council, because it is
cynical, anachronistic and constitutes a violation of the
ceasefire and of the agreed truce.
Let me recall here that the Burundian armed
groups are notorious for the horrific killing of children
in boarding schools - the most infamous being the
burning alive in 1993 of dozens of Kibimba Normal
School students, as well as the slaughter of young
seminarians in Buta in 1996, who were killed in cold
blood because they refused to group themselves by
ethnicity, as had been ordered by the FDD rebel
execution squad. The rebels also have excelled in the
destruction of schools and hospitals, as well as in the
kidnapping of schoolchildren and students under the
age of 15, with the goal of recruiting them or making
them carry plundered goods. As the report points out,
these actions are true war crimes, which, thankfully,
the International Criminal Court plans to prosecute.
The challenge raised by the situation of children
in the Burundian conflict can be taken up now that the
combatants seem to want to put an end to the war. Once
the war has ended, the national and international
community will be able to reweave the physical, social
and moral fabric of the country. Children will once
again be able to smile and to live a full and happy life
with their parents - who themselves will welcome the
chance to rebuild their lives in a reconciled nation. We
ask the international community and the Security
Council in particular to continue to help Burundi, so
that it may continue forward on the path to peace.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Japan. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Ms. Saiga (Japan): As all of us here will
acknowledge with regret, the majority of victims and
casualties in recent conflicts have been civilians, of
whom the most vulnerable are children. Children are
the most negatively affected by armed conflicts, as they
are the victims of attacks, landmines and violence on
the one hand, while being exploited as child soldiers on
the other. We all bear responsibility for safeguarding
the rights and welfare of children, who are the basis of
the future development of any society. It is therefore
commendable that the Security Council has regularly
been taking up this important subject since 1998.
The Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan, Yoriko
Kawaguchi, is advocating what is referred to as the
"consolidation of peace", which is a new pillar of our
foreign policy. This consolidation of peace includes a
feature under which Japan would provide early support
to local communities, before the achievement of any
formal peace agreement. This initiative not only
provides local people with assistance at a crucial time
of need, but also gives critical momentum to the peace
process by enabling them to enjoy the dividends of
peace. That approach is more proactive than our
conventional approach, which had focused on
rehabilitation and the reconstruction of a country after
the signing of a peace accord. Specifically, in order to
ensure that children enjoy those dividends of peace,
Japan has made a variety of concrete efforts to protect
and assist children in situations of armed conflict. One
example is the "Back to School" campaign in
Afghanistan, which the United Nations Children's
Fund has been advancing, with the financial support of
Japan. Other examples of Japan's efforts in this area
are school reconstruction and education reactivation in
Kosovo, Timor-Leste and Cote d'Ivoire; assistance to
internally displaced children in Somalia; and landmine
awareness education in Afghanistan, Angola and the
Sudan, to name just a few countries.
I should like, on behalf of the Japanese
Government, to make a number of comments regarding
the United Nations work on children and armed
conflict.
First, we would like to express our appreciation
to the Special Representative of the Secretary-General
for Children and Armed Conflict, Mr. Olara Otunnu,
for his activities, including field visits to countries
caught in or recovering from armed conflict, since such
visits can contribute to the promotion of awareness of
the importance of the protection of children in
situations of armed conflict, who need special attention
for their survival. The annex to the most recent report
of the Secretary-General includes a list of certain
parties to armed conflicts that recruit or use child
soldiers. It is not sufficient simply to denounce those
who are responsible, but every possible effort - for
example, awareness raising and eradicating the culture
of impunity - must be made to bring such practices to
an end.
Secondly, a number of United Nations agencies
have been actively involved in the issue of children and
armed conflict, including the Office of the Special
Representative, field-based implementing agencies and
various departments at Headquarters. In order for such
agencies to use the limited resources available in an
effective and efficient manner, inter-agency
coordination and periodic review and streamlining of
their activities are of great importance. Japan therefore
welcomes the adoption by the General Assembly of
resolution 57/ 190, entitled "Rights of the child", which
calls for a comprehensive assessment of the response
of the United Nations system to the issue of children
and armed conflict. It is hoped that concrete and bold
ideas for the reform of United Nations activities in this
area will be submitted, based upon achievements to
date and changing needs on the ground.
Thirdly, Japan is pleased that the Security
Council has been regularly addressing the subject of
children and armed conflict, as well as those of the
protection of civilians in armed conflict and women,
peace and security, as the issue of the protection of
civilians, including women and children, is part and
parcel of the maintenance of international peace and
security. As my Government has frequently pointed
out, however, the three subjects are intricately
intertwined and thus should be addressed in an
integrated manner. For instance, those three issues
might well be addressed under a single agenda item.
In conclusion, I am convinced that under your
leadership, Mr. President, a resolution will be adopted
that contributes to the improvement of the situation of
children suffering as a result of conflict.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Namibia. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Andjaba (Namibia): Permit me at the outset,
Sir, to express my delegation's satisfaction at seeing
see you presiding over the work of the Security
Council this month, and to thank you for having
convened this very important meeting. I would also
like to take this opportunity to warmly congratulate the
new members of the Council and to pledge my
delegation's full support to them. Allow me also to pay
tribute to the outgoing members of the Council for the
excellent manner in which they participated in the
Council's work over the past two years.
I would like to thank the Secretary-General for
his statement this morning and for his thought-
provoking report, which reviews activities and progress
made in the protection of children affected by
situations of armed conflict. This report goes a step
further than a mere review of the situation; it provides
a list of parties to armed conflict that recruit or use
children in violation of relevant international
obligations, and highlights the plight of children in
conflicts that are not on the agenda of the Security
Council. We see this step as a positive development in
our efforts to protect the most vulnerable in our society.
I wish to commend the Special Representative of
the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict, Mr. Olara Otunnu, as well as Ms. Carol
Bellamy, Executive Director of the United Nations
Children's Fund, for the information that they provided
today. Their tireless work and actions are clear
testimony of their strong and unwavering commitment
to protect children everywhere.
It is encouraging to note from the report that
impressive gains have been made in codifying
international norms and standards for the protection
and well-being of children. My delegation applauds
this progress, since, as has been stated many times by
the Council, the impact of conflict on children has
severe implications, not only for peace and security,
but also for socio-economic development. These
positive developments should be built upon by the
international community to ensure that children are
forever protected against the consequences of war.
Further efforts should be made to ensure that the
standards according to which children are treated are
implemented on the ground, and that permanent
monitoring and reporting mechanisms are created in
order to identify and adopt measures against violations.
As responsible members of the international
community, we must move with a great sense of
urgency - and move beyond mere words. We must
take concrete actions to practise what we preach. And
we must not forget the children that are today suffering
under foreign occupation and domination.
Here, I speak of the children of Palestine and the
children of Western Sahara. We must summon the
necessary courage and political will to bring the
suffering of those children to an end by ensuring that
their countries attain their inalienable right to self-
determination. The Security Council has a Charter
responsibility in that regard.
For its part, Namibia will continue to contribute
to all efforts aimed at protecting future generations
from the evils of armed conflict. It is for those reasons
that Namibia was at the forefront in getting the
Security Council involved in addressing the plight of
children in armed conflict during our tenure in the
Council in 1999 and 2000. We therefore strongly
supported resolutions 1261 (1999) and 1314 (2000),
which were adopted during that period. Resolution
1261 (1999), in particular, heightened international
attention with regard to this issue, which resulted in the
progress that we are seeing today.
Furthermore, we believe that the entry into force
of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
and of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child will have a profound impact that
will contribute to achieving this goal. The provisions of
the Optional Protocol will result in a sharp decrease in
the number of young children recruited for war, and the
Rome Statute will be a strong deterrent to war crimes
such as sexual violence against children. Namibia
strongly supports both instruments and will work
tirelessly to ensure that their provisions are fully
implemented.
Other specific concerns of my delegation are the
disproportionate impact of conflicts on girls and the
devastation caused by HIV/AIDS. In many instances,
the trauma of girls is compounded when they are
infected with deadly diseases through sexual violence
during times of war and peace. My delegation therefore
urges the Security Council to continue to devote
special attention to the needs of girls and to the effects
of HIV/AIDS.
Before I conclude, I wish to make an observation.
The report before us (S/2002/1299), in paragraph 55,
mentions Namibia together with several other countries
where the World Bank and other donors have
committed themselves to give priority to the
unconditional and urgent demobilization of child
soldiers in a Multi-Country Demobilization and
Reintegration Programme for the Greater Great Lakes
Region. The language of the paragraph, as it stands,
could be misinterpreted to mean that Namibia also has
child soldiers to be demobilized, although that is not
directly stated. I should like to make it very clear that
Namibia does not have or recruit child soldiers,
because that is against the supreme law of our land, the
Constitution of the Republic of Namibia.
Finally, my delegation urges the Council to act
expeditiously on the information provided to it in the
report under discussion. The paramount consideration
should be that more needs to be done to protect
children from the scourge of war.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the representative of
Ecuador. I invite him to take a seat at the Council table
and to make his statement.
Mr. Gallegos Chiriboga (Ecuador) (spoke in Spanish): It is an honour to speak before you, Sir,
representative of a friendly country such as France. At
the same time, I should like to express my delegation's
congratulations to the former President of the Council,
the representative of Colombia, on his excellent work
during his tenure. I should also like to congratulate the
representatives of Angola, Chile, Germany, Pakistan
and Spain, who have just joined the Council.
First of all, I should like to express Ecuador's
gratitude to the Secretary-General for his new and
important report on children and armed conflict
(S/2002/1299), in which he presents an account of
activities undertaken and progress achieved related to
that crucial issue during the period of the report. We
express our congratulations to the Special
Representative of the Secretary-General for Children
and Armed Conflict on his valuable initiatives and on
the commitments reached in various countries in order
to ensure the protection and well-being of children
during and after conflicts, as well as compliance with
obligations arising from international law. We
encourage the Special Representative to continue to
undertake all necessary efforts, in coordination with the
competent bodies, to achieve increasingly significant
results and commitments.
It is also important to highlight - as the
Secretary-General did in his report - the adoption by
the General Assembly of the document "A world fit for
children", annexed to resolution S-27/2, in which the
Assembly agreed on a renewed commitment to protect
children during armed conflicts, in accordance with
international humanitarian law and human rights law.
The Security Council resolutions in that area and
effective compliance with them are also important
means to contribute to that objective.
Other important advances in that sphere are the
entry into force of the Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed conflict, as well as
the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,
which ensures that the gravest significant crimes for
the international community - among which are
crimes committed specifically against children - will
not go unpunished. The strengthening of international
law in that sphere, respect for it and effective
application of it are indispensable in order to guarantee
the necessary protection for children, especially in the
light of the persistence of conflicts of all kinds in
various regions of the world. We also welcome the
progress that has been made in the incorporation of the
issue of the protection of children as an essential
component of the work of peacemaking, peace-building
and peacekeeping.
One of the saddest and most tragic realities that
we see in various parts of the world today is the
unspeakable suffering experienced by the innocent and
most helpless victims of society - children - as a
result of armed conflicts. The report of the Secretary-
General describes that intolerable reality, including the
risks to which children are exposed as a result of
landmines, unexploded ordnance and small arms and
light weapons. It also discusses the serious situation of
displaced children and the exploitation and abuses of
every kind to which children are exposed. Therefore,
the international community must accord high priority
to the situation through the implementation of better
concrete measures to guarantee children's most
fundamental rights and to mitigate and prevent the
pernicious effects that armed conflicts have on them.
In his report, the Secretary-General also
emphasizes the problems related to child soldiers.
Nothing is more inhuman and more contrary to the
highest values of any society than the fact that, instead
of toys, children are forced or permitted to handle
instruments of death; that human beings, in the earliest
stages of their existence, are dragged into violence,
confrontation and destruction. The solution to this
problem must, of course, be a United Nations priority.
Ecuador wishes to note the list included in the
Secretary-General's report, at the request of the
Security Council, of the parties to armed conflict that
recruit or use child soldiers, in violation of applicable
international obligations. This is an important
development, through which we no longer speak in
general terms concerning the brutal realities that exist
in various regions and fully identified areas. Instead,
we are identifying specific parties, which will allow us
to encourage State and non-State actors involved to
alter their behaviour and to adhere to the basic norms
of human rights and international humanitarian law.
Although much remains to be done, the progress
noted by the Secretary-General in his report on the
issue of protecting children in armed conflict, while
limited, is praiseworthy. We hope that it will continue
and that the necessary efforts and actions will be
stepped up in order to ensure that the world can truly
become a place fit for children.
The President (spoke in French): The next
speaker inscribed on my list is the Permanent Observer
of Palestine. I invite him to take a seat at the Council
table and to make his statement.
Mr. Al-Kidwa (Palestine) (spoke in Arabic): At
the outset, let me express our great satisfaction at
seeing you, Sir, preside over our Council. You are a
skilful diplomat well known throughout the United
Nations. I am pleased to see France, a friendly country,
at the helm of the Council.
Although Colombia is no longer a member of the
Security Council, I should also like to take this
opportunity to convey our thanks and appreciation to
the friendly delegation of that country and to
Ambassador Valdivieso for his presidency of the
Council last month and to wish him every success.
We also thank the former members whose
membership lapsed at the end of the year, congratulate
the new members and wish them every success.
Over the past 28 months, the children of Palestine
have been subject to systematic murderous action by
Israel, the occupying Power. During this period, the
occupying forces of Israel have committed war crimes
and acts of State terrorism, as well as systematic
violations of the rights of Palestinian children and of
the Palestinian people in general. The occupying
forces, both deliberately and through the indiscriminate
or excessive use of force, have killed over 650
Palestinian children and wounded thousands more,
hundreds of whom have been permanently disabled.
Through the use of force, widespread destruction and
the collective punishment of the entire Palestinian
community, the occupying forces have also inflicted
psychological disorders and emotional and social
damage on huge numbers of Palestinian children.
Above all, Israeli measures and practices have
impoverished Palestinian children, who consequently
suffer malnutrition and lack of health care, and have
halted and destroyed the educational system, leading to
the spread of ignorance among future generations.
All of this is occurring against the backdrop of
Israel's ongoing occupation of our land for over 35
years, during which the occupying forces have not only
oppressed and suppressed the population, but have also
practised settler colonialism, one of the worst possible
war crimes. The settler colonialism, which denies our
people's rights to exist and survive and to national
independence, further inhibits the Palestinian child's
right to a natural and normal future, such as that
enjoyed by any child throughout the world.
To all of this we must add Israel's uprooting of
half our population - including children and
women - from their lands and homes since 1948 and
its prevention of their return for over 50 years. We can
thus realize the magnitude of the great humanitarian
crisis and plight of Palestinian children at the hands of
the leaders and forces of Israel, who are war criminals
and the colonialists of the twentieth century.
The efforts of the Security Council in the field of
children and armed conflict complement the great work
of the General Assembly. In this respect, we express
our appreciation for the efforts of the General
Assembly in addressing the situation of Palestinian
children. The Israeli Charge d'affaires, with all his
well-known arrogance, earlier attacked and criticized
the General Assembly resolution concerning
Palestinian children. Only four members, whom I shall
not name, voted against that resolution. It may be
possible in a professional context for the representative
of the occupying Power to seek to defend the illegal
and illicit behaviour of his country, but it is intolerable
and disgusting that he should try to tell Member States
what to do and to portray the occupying Power as a
State that obeys and observes international law and
loves peace.
We welcome the improvement of the Security
Council's position concerning the question of children
and armed conflict through its acceptance of the legal
necessity of addressing the issue of children under
foreign occupation. This logically leads to the issue of
Palestinian children under Israeli occupation. We also
welcome the improvement of the Secretary-General's
report in this context and the reference made therein to
Palestinian children and their suffering, although the
reference inadequately covers all the essential aspects
of the issue. The same can be said of the statement
made this morning by the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict,
Mr. Olara Otunnu, in which he added to the relevant
paragraph of the Secretary-General's report another
paragraph on the use of suicide bombings in Israel.
Although we do not disagree in principle, we
nevertheless do not understand part of the text in that
additional paragraph. More important, we believe that
the two paragraphs do not clearly reflect either the
situation or its legal aspects; nor do they reflect the
tragic situation experienced by Palestinian children for
many years now. Nevertheless, this is a beginning that
we hope will develop in an appropriate manner,
including a visit by the Special Representative to
occupied Palestinian lands, including Al-Quds Al-
Sharif. We convey our welcome to him in advance.
We hope that the Security Council will take the
steps needed to provide the necessary protection for
Palestinian children living under Israeli occupation, not
only in accordance with the Convention on the Rights
of the Child and its relevant Optional Protocol but also
with the legal commitments emanating from the Fourth
Geneva Convention - which must be respected in all
circumstances, as must its Additional Protocol 1.
The President (spoke in French): The
representative of Israel has asked to speak. I invite him
to take a seat at the Council table and to make his
statement.
Mr. Mekel (Israel): I regret that I am forced to
take the floor again in this debate. We had hoped that
this discussion would not turn into an exchange
regarding the particularities of the situation in the
Middle East. Unfortunately, that has not been the case.
In the course of today's debate, a few speakers -
in particular the Palestinian observer - have used the
issue of children in armed conflict to single out Israel
for criticism and condemnation. Such criticism directed
at one country, and at one country alone, is not
intended to alleviate the situation facing Palestinian
children or, for that matter, the situation facing any
group of children living under the threat of armed
conflict. Rather, it is intended to advance a political
agenda and to isolate my country. For that reason, I am
compelled to make a second intervention.
The situation facing the Palestinian people,
including Palestinian children, is a serious one. Israel
shares the concern of the international community over
their plight and has taken steps to improve the
humanitarian situation of all Palestinians. It must be
stressed, however, that this situation is first and
foremost a product of the decision of the Palestinian
leadership to engage in violence, to pursue
confrontation in place of negotiations and to
encourage, finance and support a deliberate campaign
of terrorism against the people of Israel. While it may
be convenient to place full blame for the plight of the
Palestinian people on Israel's shoulders, the fact
remains that the Palestinian leadership, which chose to
forego a viable political process in favour of a bloody
campaign of terrorism, is primarily responsible for the
difficult situation we are currently facing.
Israel has never, and will never, intentionally
target Palestinian children or any unarmed civilian. We
recognize that, in the course of our battle with
Palestinian terrorists, civilians have suffered. Those
cases are deeply regrettable; but, in contrast to
Palestinian terrorists who have deliberately targeted
school buses, discos and other areas where children are
known to congregate, Israel has gone to great
lengths- and at considerable risk to its own
security- to ensure that its counter-terrorist
operations are conducted so as to reduce the threat to
civilians as much as possible.
Those who are genuinely concerned about the
situation of Palestinian children must scrutinize and
condemn the criminal behaviour of Palestinian
terrorists, who have obscured the fundamental
distinction between civilians and combatants, set up
camps in civilian refugee areas, used Palestinian
civilians, including children, as human shields and
used private homes and schools as bases from which to
launch attacks against Israel, in grave violation of
international humanitarian law and Security Council
resolutions. The international community must loudly
condemn the practices of Palestinian leaders, who have
actively encouraged the participation of Palestinian
children in armed conflict, elevated suicide terrorists to
the status of national heroes and urged children to
follow their examples.
If delegations truly care about Palestinian
children, they must first and foremost address the
shameful practices of Palestinian leaders and terrorists
that have led too many Palestinian children to believe
that murder and death are noble pursuits. However, if
their purpose is simply to exploit another United
Nations discussion to attack and defame Israel, let
those delegations find a more appropriate forum. On an
issue as urgent and critical as protecting children, we
can ill afford to allow our discussions to be tainted by
such naked political hostility.
The President (spoke in French): The
representative of Rwanda has asked to speak. I invite
him to take a seat at the Council table and to make his
statement.
Mr. Gasana (Rwanda) (spoke in French): A
moment ago, the Permanent Representative of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo made an attempt to
confuse the members of the Council. Fortunately,
absurdity never killed anybody. The representative of
the Democratic Republic of the Congo sought to sully
and to tarnish Rwanda's image by saying that Rwanda
had sent 20,000 prisoners to the Democratic Republic
of the Congo. I would like to say to the Council that
that was a lie, pure and simple. I would ask everyone
present here not to take the representative of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo seriously. The
Security Council should not be a forum for insults.
The President (spoke in French): The Permanent
Observer of Palestine has asked for the floor. I invite
him to take a seat at the Council table and to make his
statement.
Mr. Al-Kidwa (Palestine) (spoke in Arabic): I am
sorry to once again take up the Council's precious time,
but I would like to make the following brief points in
response to the second intervention by the Israeli
representative.
First, any attempt by Israel to depict its criminal
acts against our people as a reaction to acts of violence
by Palestinians is a false attempt. Suffice it for me to
refer to the continuation of the occupation for more
than 35 years and to the transfer by Israel of 400,000
settlers to that land, in grave violation of the Fourth
Geneva Convention and many Security Council
resolutions, in order to occupy the land and to prevent
the Palestinians from exercising their rights. The
occupation, its abhorrent practices and settler
colonialism are what led to the violent reaction by our
people, not the contrary.
Secondly, Israel's claims that it has mitigated the
suffering of our people are ridiculous. I need only refer
to the report of the Secretary-General on the
humanitarian situation.
Thirdly, the claim that Israel, the occupying
Power, has not targeted civilians or children is also a
lie. When an Israeli warplane drops a one-ton bomb on
a residential area of Gaza, that act constitutes a
deliberate murder of civilians. Two days ago, when an
Israeli helicopter fired a missile at a certain car in a
highly populated area in Gaza, resulting in the death of
two children, aged 14 and 15, it was a deliberate
murder of civilians. Israel, the occupying Power, has
deliberately murdered civilians through the excessive
and indiscriminate use of force.
Fourthly, the representative of Israel claims that
the Palestinian side uses its children as human shields.
That is very racist, as well as unacceptable. It reflects a
sick mentality. We hope that Israel's representatives
and leaders will overcome such thinking in the future.
Finally, we once again hope that the international
community will truly stand up against the culture of
illegal impunity by confronting the war crimes and all
other crimes committed by the leaders of Israel as part
of the official State policy of successive Israeli
Governments, particularly in the last 28 months. We
hope such a stance will be taken because it is the only
thing that could lend real credibility to the statements
of the international community on this issue.
Despite all this, we have not yet lost hope for
changing both the situation and the Israeli policy and
for reaching a just and comprehensive peace in the
region, based on two States, Palestine and Israel, living
side by side.
The President (spoke in French): I now give the
floor to the Special Representative of the Secretary-
General for Children and Armed Conflict, Mr. Olara
Otunnu, to respond to comments in a brief intervention,
given the lateness of the hour.
Mr. Otunnu: I have taken very careful note of
the extremely important comments and critiques made
by members of the Security Council and other
Members of the United Nations. I shall be in
continuing dialogue with them, and I shall do
everything possible to act on the suggestions and
proposals which have been made. At this late hour, I do
not intend to respond or to elaborate on any specific
suggestion or proposal. Thank you very much, Sir, for
your interest and engagement and the commitment of
the Security Council.
The President (spoke in French): I now give the
floor to the Deputy Executive Director of the United
Nations Children's Fund, Mr. Kul Gautam, to respond
to comments made in a brief statement, given the
lateness of the hour.
Mr. Gautam: It is late in the day, Sir, as you
said, so I will try to be brief. This open debate of the
Security Council has been enormously encouraging to
us at UNICEF. On behalf of Carol Bellamy, our
Executive Director, I would like to thank all Member
States that have so generously acknowledged
UNICEF's work in the demobilization and
reintegration of children in situations of armed conflict
in many countries. We will convey your words of
appreciation and encouragement and your sense of
solidarity to our field staff, who work day in and day
out to try to help children in difficult circumstances. I
know it will be a tremendous inspiration to them.
I would also like to take this occasion to
acknowledge and pay a special tribute to our non-
governmental organization partners. There are very few
of them left here. But I know that there is a large
number of them outside, watching the proceedings of
the Council. Their work and collaboration are of
tremendous value to the work of the United Nations.
We could not be as effective as we are without their
passion, support and solidarity.
As many delegations highlighted, prevention is
better than cure. A major contribution by UNICEF and
our partner organizations to ensure that all children are
helped to enjoy childhood to their full potential
requires investing in basic services and reaching the
Millennium Development Goals, which are very
important for the development of children.
We were particularly happy to hear so many
delegations referring to the commitment that our
leaders made to "A world fit for children". Indeed, if
we can implement some of the goals, targets and
objectives of "A world fit for children", we will do
well for children in difficult circumstances, in armed
conflict and otherwise.
Let me mention just two or three specific things
that we take to heart. Several delegations reminded us
that the illicit traffic in small arms contributes
enormously to violence. We share their concerns and
hope that there will be a stronger response in that area.
We are encouraged by the comments made by many
delegations on the need to ensure that the list in the
annex to the Secretary-General's report is developed,
strengthened, expanded, reviewed and made more of a
practical tool. We hope that these statements will be
reflected in the Council's resolution, when it is adopted
in the next few days. Many delegations made specific
suggestions and recommendations for the follow-up to
the Secretary-General's report. Austria, speaking on
behalf of the Human Security Network, made 10 very
specific and concrete proposals. We trust that some of
those very specific and pertinent points will be
reflected in the draft resolution that the Council is to
adopt in the next few days.
The Council's debate today, and the draft
resolution that it will soon adopt, will provide powerful
encouragement and support for all of us to redouble our
efforts to protect children from the barbarity of armed
conflict and to help them build, and live in, a more
peaceful world - a world that is fit for children.
The President (spoke in French): I thank the
Deputy Executive Director of the United Nations
Children's Fund for his statement.
There are no further speakers inscribed on my
list.
The Security Council has thus concluded the
present stage of its consideration of the item on its
agenda.
The meeting rose at 7.55 p.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.4684Resumption1.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-4684Resumption1/. Accessed .