S/PV.4766Resumption1 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
33
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Peacekeeping support and operations
Security Council deliberations
African Union peace and security
Sustainable development and climate
Peace processes and negotiations
War and military aggression
Thematic
Mr. Pleuger (Germany): Let me begin by saying
that we fully endorse the statement that will be made
later by the presidency of the European Union on
behalf of all its member States.
I would like to thank you and your delegation,
Mr. President, for having convened this very important
meeting.
Germany welcomes the fact that the Council
gives a great deal of attention to the situation in Africa.
That is where most conflicts are taking place, with the
greatest human suffering. It is therefore appropriate to
have two upcoming Security Council missions focus on
the major African issues. We expect fresh impetus for
future Council action.
The work of regional organizations in Africa is
highly commendable, and it shows a growing sense of
responsibility. I would like to pay tribute in particular
to current efforts by the African Union, the Economic
Community of West African States, the Central African
Economic and Monetary Community and the
Intergovernmental Authority on Development in the
prevention and settlement of conflicts. By promoting a
political settlement and contributing to peacekeeping in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo, individual
countries such as South Africa show strong leadership
in promoting stability in a conflict situation. The same
is true for those countries providing troops for the
African mission in Burundi and for other regional
initiatives.
We particularly welcome the decision taken by
the Security Council this morning to authorize a
peacekeeping mission to Bunia, in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, thereby bringing relief and
security to the suffering population. We commend
France for having taken the lead in this mission.
The primary responsibility for creating the
necessary conditions to prevent crises and to take
measures to solve conflicts lies with the affected
countries themselves. The international community can
help, but its support can be effective only if the parties
themselves decide to bring about a solution to the
conflict that is conducive to durable peace. That brings
into focus the importance of a regional approach to
crisis situations in Africa - in particular in West
Africa and the Great Lakes region, where many
problems are interlinked and instability seems to be
spreading. Let me highlight just three of these
interlinked problems: first, the plundering of natural
resources; secondly, the flow of weapons; and, thirdly,
the refugee problem.
On the first point, the plundering of natural
resources, we feel that this often fuels and prolongs
conflicts. We see the worst example of that in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. An intensive
dialogue with Governments and political leaders is
necessary. Where dialogue fails, international pressure
on Governments, companies and individuals must be
the next step. A good example of the dialogue we
envisage is the Expert Panel on the Illegal Exploitation
of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. Their reports have
had positive results, because Governments have taken
action and companies have been encouraged to review
their policies.
The second point, the continuous flow of
weapons and other military materiel to belligerents, is
another important issue. In our view, neighbouring
States must cooperate in the effort, and muster the
political will, to stop the flow of arms to belligerents.
If failure to do so is due to a lack of capabilities, those
have to be strengthened. In addition, better
implementation of Security Council resolutions is
necessary. For example, effective implementation of
existing sanctions regimes for Liberia and Somalia
could give considerable support to regional mediation
efforts between the parties to those conflicts. In both
cases panels of experts established by the Security
Council are working very effectively to monitor and
improve the implementation of those sanctions
regimes. They are supplying the Council with
important recommendations. It is a matter of political
will among Council members to then use those findings
effectively.
Further measures to control the illicit flow of
small arms have to be taken. I fully agree with
Ambassador Aguilar Zinser, who said this morning that
small arms and small weapons are the real weapons of
mass destruction: they kill more people than any other
weapon. This implies that we must not only see to it
that we curtail the purchase of such weapons on the
demand side, but also that we establish controls on the
supply side. The United Nations weapons register is an
important tool in this regard.
Finally, the third example of the regional
dimension of a prevailing problem is the large numbers
of refugees, displaced persons and other vulnerable
groups. As witnessed in the conflicts in Liberia and
Cote d'Ivoire, refugees are often driven back and forth
between the changing front lines of a conflict. The
fragile stability achieved in Sierra Leone is tested by
the influx of new refugees from neighbouring
countries. We therefore believe the Security Council
should, on the basis of the results of its mission,
seriously consider a comprehensive approach to
stabilize this region.
With regard to strengthening African capabilities
in the fields of the prevention, management and
solution of armed conflict, Germany is fully committed
to the strategic goal expressed in the G-8 Africa Action
Plan to enhance technical and financial assistance. Its
goal is that by 2010 African countries and regional and
subregional organizations will be able to engage even
more effectively to prevent and resolve violent conflict
on the continent and to undertake peace support
operations in accordance with the Charter of the United
Nations.
The instruments are mostly there, but we must
generate the political will to use them effectively.
Mr. Tafrov (Bulgaria) (spoke in French): I would
like to thank you, Mr. President, for having organized
this wrap-up meeting - a meeting that is also a
preparation for the two missions that are to leave for
Africa in the coming days. I would also like to thank
Ibrahim Gambari for his statement this morning. I
believe that a number of his recommendations should
be considered carefully by the Council.
As a country associated with the European Union,
Bulgaria associates itself with the statement to be made
later by the representative of Greece on behalf of the
European Union. I would, however, like to make a few
brief comments in my national capacity.
Bulgaria considers it natural that a great deal of
the Security Council's effort and time, and much of its
agenda, should be devoted to Africa, since the conflicts
on that continent have an unfortunate tendency to be
intense, long-running and cyclical in nature. They take
a heavy toll in terms of the number of victims and the
human suffering they cause. From that perspective, it is
important for the Security Council and the United
Nations system to continue not just to have a presence
on the African continent, but to be very active there.
The missions that the Council has been undertaking for
some years now on that continent are a manifestation
of the sustained attention the United Nations gives to
Africa.
This morning the two leaders of the missions -
Jean-Marc de La Sabliere and Jeremy Greenstock -
clearly set out the objectives of those missions. I have
little to add, but I would like simply to refer to a
comment by Ambassador Pleuger relating to the
problem of small arms. That is certainly a major
problem in Africa, and it is linked to the issue of the
illegal exploitation of natural resources, since the
exploitation of such resources is the main source of
funding for the arms trade.
I agree with his analysis, but I would like to draw
the attention of Council members to one of the links in
the chain of the arms trade - international arms
dealers. This is a relatively small group of individuals
who are well known to the legal authorities and the
police in many countries throughout the world. Those
who work on sanctions committees are well aware that
the same names crop up again and again. We must
begin to deal with that problem once and for all, as it is
of crucial importance for the African continent, as well
as other parts of the world. It also has a negative
impact on the countries where such arms brokers
operate, as they are a source of corruption with respect
to administrations of many arms-producing countries
that serve as intermediaries in this traffic. I wanted to
make that point during this debate, because it seemed
that, in the context of the fight against organized
crime - and this is clearly one aspect of that fight -
we could not remain silent on the harmful role of such
arms brokers.
Another point to which I would like to refer is the
partnership of the Security Council with African
regional and subregional organizations, which I think
we all agree is very important. Judging from my own
personal experience, very often such organizations
need enhanced capacity - institutional, financial and
personnel capacity - in reacting to crisis situations.
With regard to the situation in the Great Lakes
region, I believe that it is important to ensure that
regional and subregional cooperation not be confined
merely to the drawing up of successive peace plans but
go beyond that. In this context, the experience of
certain continents - and I, of course, can speak of
Europe - could be considered by our African friends.
The situation with regard to the reciprocal recognition
of borders, for example, is somewhat similar to that in
Europe in the 1970s and 19805, when the Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe was involved.
That might not provide an exact model, but it could
prove useful to African countries.
Before concluding, I would like to make one
point very forcefully. Our experience during the
Security Council missions has shown us the importance
on the ground of the work of non-governmental
organizations. Those organizations do outstanding
work, and their partnership with the United Nations is
extremely useful and should be encouraged.
I must say that our discussions on Africa would
not make much headway if we did not take account of
the global context in which African conflicts take
place. Africans often come up against globalization in
the form of the internationalization of arms trafficking,
which, in its turn, benefits from a very effective
international banking system. I believe that to some
extent, the United Nations and non-governmental
organizations represent the human face of
globalization. That is why the role of the United
Nations in Africa is irreplaceable.
The President: The next speaker inscribed on my
list is the representative of Japan. I invite him to take a
seat at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Haraguchi (Japan): I would like to express
my appreciation for your leadership, Sir, in convening
this meeting to address the situations in West and
Central Africa, which have become of grave concern to
the international community. It is timely, in our view,
for the Security Council to dispatch missions to those
regions to gain a precise understanding of the
situations and the gravity of the crises and to directly
address the question of what effective measures can be
taken by the United Nations.
Conflict resolution in Africa requires an enhanced
and comprehensive approach to ensure and coordinate
cooperation by various actors within the international
community. We hope that, upon returning from the
missions, the members of the Council will share with
all of us the first-hand knowledge and experiences they
have gained so that the international community can
effectively tackle the problems in the regions.
We welcome the efforts of the Security Council,
especially the adoption of the resolution today with
regard to the situation in the Ituri region of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is one of the
main destinations of the mission to Central Africa, I
understand. It is our hope that the mission, through its
direct assessment of the situation on the ground, will
provide us with recommendations to consider carefully
whether there is a need to expand the peacekeeping
operation in the near future.
One of the most disheartening characteristics of
the conflicts we are witnessing in West and Central
Africa is their spillover from one country to another
and, as a consequence, the regionalization, as it were,
of those conflicts. Let me explain why I said
"disheartening". Peace and stability in a society are
essential for development. It is profoundly sad that the
African continent, where development is perhaps more
necessary than in any other region of the world, is most
frequently faced with the scourge of conflicts. Some
believe that conflicts erupt because of
underdevelopment and others maintain that
underdevelopment is a result of conflicts. I believe that
both arguments have their own points and it might not
be useful to judge which is more correct. It is a vicious
circle that we must do our utmost to stop.
It is out of this awareness that Japan is supporting
the ongoing disarmament, demobilization and
reintegration process in Sierra Leone, for instance,
while at the same time providing financial assistance,
through the Economic Community of West African
States, to the all-Liberia round-table conference that
will be held next month in Ghana. Since the situations
in Sierra Leone and Liberia are closely interrelated, it
is our sincere hope that, by simultaneously restoring
stability in those two neighbouring countries, we can
prevent the spillover of the conflicts and enhance the
stability of the entire subregion.
Of course, the resolution of a conflict depends
ultimately upon the willingness and efforts of the
conflicting parties themselves - that is, they must
address their problems with a sense of ownership. But
the achievement of this goal can and must be fostered
through cooperation or partnership with the
international community. Just this month, the
Government of Japan announced its new Initiative for
Cooperation for Africa, the three main pillars of which
are consolidation of peace, human-centred
development and poverty reduction through economic
growth. Under the first pillar, we will support activities
for the consolidation of peace in the fields of
reintegration of ex-combatants into civil society,
demining, small arms and assistance to refugees and
internally displaced persons. These activities are
implemented through Grant Aid for Conflict
Prevention and Peace-Building and the Trust Fund for
Human Security.
I am pleased to note that in Angola and Sierra
Leone the prolonged conflicts have recently ended and
peace has been restored. If those two countries are able
to continue to promote their development as they have
done since the end of the conflicts, their experience of
success in building upon the peace will provide an
important lesson and incentive for other conflict-torn
countries in Africa. In this sense, Japan would like to
commend and support as much as possible the efforts
of those countries towards the consolidation of peace
and the promotion of development.
Last but not least, I would like to refer to the
point which the Ambassador of Bulgaria just stressed.
I, too, believe that the cooperation of the countries of
Africa is most appropriate and effective for the
resolution of armed conflicts on the continent. We
therefore strongly hope that the African Union,
regional organizations and ad hoc groups of friendly
African countries will pursue initiatives for the
resolution of conflicts in Central and West Africa.
The President: The next speaker on my list is the
representative of Malaysia. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Rastam (Malaysia): My delegation is
pleased to see you, Sir, presiding over this important
meeting of the Security Council. We join others in
commending you and the delegation of Pakistan for
your skilful and excellent stewardship of the Council
during the month of May. We further commend you for
the initiative of convening this meeting to discuss the
efforts of the United Nations in promoting peace and
security in Africa. Debate on this subject is most
timely. We recognize the preoccupation of and
importance attached by the Council to African issues,
which take up some 60 per cent of its work. We
welcome the Council's effort to refocus itself on the
conflict situations in Africa, especially in light of
recent tragic events there. We are very pleased that the
Council adopted resolutions 1484 (2003) and 1485
(2003) this morning.
Peacekeeping constitutes an important instrument
at the disposal of the Security Council. However, the
Council must avoid selectivity and double standards in
establishing United Nations peacekeeping operations,
especially in Africa. Malaysia has contributed military
and police personnel to most of the United Nations
peacekeeping operations in Africa, beginning with the
first mission in the Congo in the early 1960s.
Strong commitment and continued and sustained
support in terms of manpower, financing and material
by United Nations Member States are essential in
ensuring the operational success of peacekeeping
operations. The effectiveness of United Nations
peacekeeping missions should not be jeopardized by a
lack of necessary funding and adequate and well-
trained and equipped personnel from Member States.
The Council and the Secretariat should make every
effort to engage Member States, particularly troop-
contributing countries, at the planning stage and at
every subsequent phase of any particular operation. We
all know that dispatching peacekeeping missions at less
than their required strength and with inadequate
equipment can result in tragic consequences, as has
been the experience in the case of some previous and
current operations. What has happened in Ituri
province is a clear example. The dispatch of the
Interim Emergency Multinational Force in support of
the United Nations mission in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo is a very positive and timely response by
the international community.
Beyond the deployment of peacekeeping missions
in existing conflict situations, there is a need for the
Council and the United Nations as a whole to develop
effective strategies for the prevention of armed conflict
and for post-conflict peace-building, including efforts
to disarm, demobilize and reintegrate ex-combatants in
a post-conflict situation. Concrete measures must be
taken to consolidate and sustain the peace. Malaysia
associated itself closely with the disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration (DDR) initiative
during its membership of the Council in the years 1999
and 2000. We wish to reiterate our conviction that each
and every component of the DDR process must be
given due importance, equal emphasis and adequate
funding to ensure success and the non-return of former
combatants to conflict. Like all other United Nations
programmes and activities, the problem of adequate
funding in the effective implementation of the DDR
programmes must be addressed. Generous support from
the international community is critical, especially from
those who have the means in terms of money and
technical expertise. The relevant organs and agencies
of the United Nations must be fully involved in the
post-conflict peace-building process. The private sector
can certainly be encouraged to play an important role
through reconstruction, investment and other relevant
economic activities.
My delegation believes that there is a need for the
Security Council - and the United Nations in
general - to seriously and systematically address the
root causes of conflict in ways that could minimize the
potential for further and more protracted conflict and
instability on the African continent. In that regard, we
welcome the work of the Open-ended Ad Hoc Working
Group on the Causes of Conflict and the Promotion of
Durable Peace and Sustainable Development in Africa,
established by the General Assembly in its resolution
53/92. We sincerely hope that all the proposals made
will be fully implemented. We also welcome the
establishment of the Economic and Social Council Ad
Hoc Advisory Group on African Countries Emerging
from Conflict and the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on
Guinea-Bissau. A comprehensive and integrated
approach towards African issues and better
coordination in that regard within the United Nations
system, involving the principal organs - the General
Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and
Social Council and the Secretariat - United Nations
agencies and the Bretton Woods institutions, should be
urgent priorities.
My delegation also wishes to underscore the
important role that can be played by regional
organizations, arrangements and agencies in the
promotion of regional peace and security as well as
economic and social development. Regional
cooperation can be a key to the creation of a peaceful
and cooperative environment. The institutional
linkages and mechanisms of cooperation and
coordination between the United Nations and the
African Union and subregional organizations must be
strengthened. We welcome the revival in the African
Union of organs responsible for conflict prevention and
resolution and all other initiatives being pursued by the
African Union (AU) - including the Peace and
Security Council of the AU - in the promotion of
peace and security on the continent.
My delegation strongly supports the practice of
dispatching Security Council missions to conflict areas,
not only to supplement the efforts undertaken by the
Secretariat, but also, and more important, to enable
Council members to better appreciate the situation on
the ground and the complexities of the problems that
the Council must deal with. We welcome the
forthcoming Council missions to Central Africa and
West Africa early next month. We agree with the
statement in your non-paper, Mr. President, that
"... the two missions should be a powerful signal
to all parties to the conflicts in Africa that the
Council intends to maintain its focus on African
issues and will remain actively engaged with
Africa".
Indeed, that powerful signal should not be seen as
coming only from the Security Council; it should also
be regarded as a strong message from the entire United
Nations membership. We note that similar missions
undertaken in the past have proved valuable to the
Council's work. Malaysia participated in the Council's
mission to East Timor in 1999. We would recommend
that such exercises be undertaken on a more regular
basis in the future, not only to Africa but also to other
regions. That would demonstrate the Council's
continuing commitment to ensuring the engagement of
the United Nations in the promotion of peace and
security. We look forward to being informed of the
findings and recommendations of those missions.
In addressing the issues at hand, we all know
what the problems essentially are, what ought to be
done and where the responsibilities lie. There is clearly
a need for more serious commitment and action on the
part of all concerned: the Security Council, the entire
United Nations membership, the rest of the United
Nations system, the international community at large
and, above all, the parties in conflict. We must all do
our utmost to assist in resolving current conflicts in
Africa and preventing new ones from occurring. The
key to that lies in political will: the will to take the
necessary measures and to follow up on them. That
political will to act and to deal with conflict situations
should be demonstrated in an even-handed fashion
wherever they occur, whether in Africa or elsewhere.
We are impressed with the incremental but
tangible steps that have already been taken by African
countries themselves. We believe that all their efforts
must be supported by the international community. The
Security Council can help in further encouraging and
generating that support through its actions and
decisions. This debate is another step in the right
direction. We commend you, Mr. President, and the
Council.
The President: I thank the representative of
Malaysia for the kind words he addressed to me.
Mr. Valdes (Chile) (spoke in Spanish): At the
outset, the delegation of Chile wishes to sincerely
congratulate the Pakistani presidency on its excellent
work in guiding the Security Council during this month
of May and on the very timely choice of the theme
"Conflicts in Africa: Security Council missions and
United Nations mechanisms to promote peace and
security" for this wrap-up meeting.
For those of us who in recent months have been
obliged to assess - not without anguish - the
situation of a number of African countries that seem to
be teetering unavoidably on a precipice of
disintegration and violence, there could not be a more
important theme than this one in the United Nations
system. Without really knowing what to do, we have
witnessed a macabre vicious circle marked by internal
and external war; the dissolution of the authority and
administrative capacity of the State; the gradual
elimination of the economic and social potential of
countries; the systematic violation of human rights; the
existence of millions of refugees fleeing to countries
that in turn are affected by grave economic crises; an
increase in HIV/AIDS and in other epidemics and
illnesses; the indiscriminate traffic in small arms and
light weapons; the illegal exploitation of natural
resources that finances such traffic; and, everywhere,
hunger. And, amid that horror, we have witnessed the
suffering of the weakest: the forced recruitment of
children and the violation of rights that is suffered
daily by African girls and women. The slow dissolution
of colonial borders, the collapse of States and the
emigration of the elite threaten the world with a
humanitarian catastrophe that cannot fail to affect all of
us.
We know full well that many others compiled that
list of horrors before we did, and we are fearful and
anguished at the lack of solutions. We sincerely hope
that the dialogue that the Security Council missions
undertake with political leaders in Central and West
Africa will be translated into progress and effective
commitments. However, we believe we must not
harbour too many illusions. Experience shows that the
exercise of finding out, listening and agreeing is
insufficient if it is not accompanied by real and
resolute political will to translate those experiences and
exchanges into decisions and, later, into the
implementation of stable and long-term policies.
Today, the Security Council is obliged to
intervene in conflicts requiring urgent action by the
international community - particularly in those whose
dimensions and effects have a regional nature. The
most illustrative cases are probably Liberia and the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. We cannot allow
those situations to lead to tragedies such as those that
we have witnessed in the past. Chile welcomes the
commendable attitude of France and other countries
that have offered troops to assist the small group of
Uruguayans who make up the peace force in Bunia.
However, even if we are able to prevent the
continuation of those tragedies, we need to assess the
effectiveness of the mechanisms currently used by the
United Nations so that we can move from a focus on
conflict management to one on conflict prevention and
support for the role of regional and subregional
organizations in managing such situations.
The demobilization and reintegration processes,
which have been referred to repeatedly in these
discussions, must be maintained and further
emphasized. As was stated this morning by
Ambassador Kumalo of South Africa, the African
Union and initiatives such as the New Partnership for
Africa's Development are awaiting support from the
Security Council to promote the common vision of
peace and sustainable development for the region,
which has brought so many African leaders together.
We have seen the main tasks in the area of peace
and security carried out by the African Union and by
the Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS) in Sierra Leone in the past and today in
Cote d'Ivoire. We also recognize the usefulness of, and
the need for, the expansion and strengthening of
coordination between the Security Council and the
Economic and Social Council. But that will not be
sufficient unless the international financial
organizations are also involved.
Conspiring against greater effectiveness of the
mechanisms to which I referred earlier is, undoubtedly,
a chronic shortage of resources. Greater investment by
States with economic capacity in this area quite likely
would benefit not only the local population but also, in
future, the developed world, and would also help to
avert greater migratory pressure than already exists.
Before concluding, let me say that we cannot fail
to reflect on some of the underlying causes of the
African conflicts. Underpinning each of our
discussions on national cases is the issue of poverty
and extreme underdevelopment in the region. There is
no doubt that much bloodshed could be prevented and
money saved if developed countries spearheaded a
programme open to the entire international community
aimed at intervening economically in those countries,
providing them with appropriate technical experts,
monitoring their economic decisions, generating
investments and opening wide their doors to exports.
The promotion of national cases that have been
successful in the area of development might have a
very positive ripple effect in the region and enable it to
emerge from the situation it is now in. But to that end
political will is required. Political will means, for
example, the reduction of subsidies to agricultural
products that are presently in force in the markets of
the rich countries. Political will means, for example,
forgiving Africa's external debt. Measures such as
these might be even more effective in alleviating
poverty in Africa.
In this regard, we welcome the initiatives which
many Governments have developed. We deem it
important to highlight the initiative of the Government
of the United States, and those of other countries,
decisively to combat the AIDS epidemic in the
continent. We hope that this is but one example of
many more such examples in future that will contribute
to the well-being of millions of African citizens.
The very credibility of our Organization once
again is being put to the test in this African crisis. The
United Nations must act. Our country is prepared to
participate in all of the collective efforts launched and
sacrifices made by the international community in this
area.
The President: I thank Ambassador Valdes for
the kind words he addressed to the Pakistan presidency.
Ms. Menendez (Spain) (spoke in Spanish): I wish
warmly to thank you, Sir, for having selected this issue
for this wrap-up discussion. We feel that it is a very
important issue and that it is quite timely, in view of
the upcoming Security Council missions to Africa.
As Greece will be speaking on behalf of the
European Union after my delegation has spoken, and in
order to be brief, as is required for our statements
today, we will limit ourselves to expressing our views
on four points which, in my delegation's view, are of
particular importance given the fact that these missions
are about to take place - missions in which we will be
involved.
First, I will touch on the subregional dimension,
which is of extreme importance in the prevention and
resolution of conflicts in Africa. We believe that
subregional initiatives must have the support of the
international community. In this regard, we are pleased
to note the increasingly important role played by the
Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS) in West Africa, and in particular its active
participation in the conflict in Cote d'Ivoire.
We also have noted with interest the revitalization
of the Economic and Monetary Community of Central
Africa (CEMAC) in the context of the conflict in the
Central African Republic. We also believe that it is
important to revitalize the forum established by the
Mano River Union, which could play a very important
role in promoting confidence-building measures among
its three member countries.
It is also encouraging to note at the regional level
that the African Union is prepared to play an active
role in managing and resolving conflicts, as can be
seen in the mission now deployed in Burundi to
supervise the ceasefire and to demobilize the rebel
groups on a voluntary basis.
Secondly, the humanitarian situation is an integral
part of conflicts and not a subsidiary or auxiliary one.
It is essential for humanitarian questions to play a
central role in the resolution phase of conflicts because,
unfortunately, the repercussions of the complex
conflicts taking place in Africa very dramatically affect
civilian populations. My delegation would reiterate that
it is unacceptable that in many cases the various
warring factions do not allow humanitarian
organizations access to the civilian population.
Thirdly, respect for human rights is a fundamental
issue and is also related to the question of how to
address the question of responsibility for violations of
human rights in the resolution phase of a conflict. We
deem impunity to be unacceptable. Only by
establishing adequate mechanisms which ensure just
treatment of this issue can progress be made in
reconciliation, which is one of the greatest challenges
for societies emerging from conflict.
Fourthly, and lastly, let me turn to the post-
conflict phase. It is important for the Security Council
to pay due attention to this phase, since its fragility is
one of the greatest challenges facing those African
States which have been able to emerge from conflict.
In many cases, this post-conflict phase takes
place in a regional framework characterized by other
conflicts and by the presence of destabilizing factors
such as arms trafficking, the presence of mercenaries or
the problem of refugees. It is very important, therefore,
for the international community to follow up this post-
conflict phase very closely, providing the required
political and financial support.
In this regard, we welcome the increasingly close
cooperation between the Council and the Economic and
Social Council in establishing ad hoc groups, and we
endorse the comments to this effect that were made this
morning by Special Adviser Gambari.
To conclude, we express our gratitude once again
for the choice of this issue for today's meeting. We are
confident that the practical conclusions that we reach
today will be integrated into the missions and that the
principal recommendations of the missions will receive
adequate follow-up from the Council.
The President: I thank the representative of
Spain for her kind words addressed to the Pakistan
delegation.
I now call on the representative of Greece. I
invite him to take a seat at the Council table and to
make his statement.
Mr. Daratzikis (Greece): I have the honour to
speak on behalf of the European Union. The acceding
countries Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia,
Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia
and Slovenia, the associated countries Bulgaria,
Romania and Turkey, and the European Free Trade
Association country member of the European
Economic Area Iceland declare that they align
themselves with this statement.
The European Union firmly believes that the
promotion of durable peace and sustainable
development in Africa constitutes one of the major
challenges of the international community at the dawn
of the twenty-first century. In this regard, we recognize
the importance of the report of the Secretary-General
on the causes of conflict and the promotion of durable
peace and sustainable development in Africa.
The management of the intra-State and inter-State
conflicts that still plague significant parts of the
African continent and assistance to African countries
emerging from such conflict situations, should, in our
view, be among the highest priorities of the United
Nations system. In that connection, the European
Union strongly supports the action taken by the United
Nations, in particular by the Security Council, in the
fields of preventive diplomacy, peacemaking,
peacekeeping and peace-building.
The establishment by the Security Council of the
Ad Hoc Working Group on Conflict Prevention and
Resolution in Africa and the Economic and Social
Council's establishment of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group
on African Countries Emerging from Conflict, together
with the adoption by the General Assembly of the
resolution on the New Partnership for Africa's
Development, have provided useful mechanisms to
address the multiple needs of those countries. At the
same time, those actions indicate that there is an
interactive relationship between security and
development, as both are indispensable for the
achievement of peace and sustainable development.
The European Union welcomes the continued
involvement of the international financial institutions
in this process. They have an essential role to play in
consolidating peace in countries emerging from
conflict and in supporting efforts towards long-term
growth and development.
Identifying and addressing the multidimensional
root causes of conflicts in Africa is another important
element in the long fight for peace and stability in the
region. Dealing with issues such as socio-economic
inequities and inequalities, systematic ethnic
discrimination, the denial of human rights, disputes
over political participation or long-standing grievances
over land, the illicit proliferation of small arms and
light weapons, the plight of refugees and internally
displaced persons and the illegal exploitation of natural
resources is of critical importance in the process of
moving from conflict management to prevention and
final resolution. In our View, the existence of
appropriate and effective mechanisms and institutions,
including good governance and rule of law, as well as
respect for human rights and addressing fundamental
inequities, are of great importance for the early
prevention of conflicts and a durable peace in the
continent.
The European Union believes that a
comprehensive approach to the root causes of conflicts
in Africa would also benefit from enhanced
cooperation between the Security Council and other
United Nations bodies. In that regard, we look forward
to having a fruitful discussion at the fifty-eighth
session of the General Assembly, where item 40 (b) of
the preliminary agenda provides the appropriate
framework for further inputs to emerge.
The European Union considers that the two
upcoming Security Council missions to the region will
serve as a pointed reminder of the acute interest and
engagement of the international community in Africa,
especially at a time when conflicts in certain parts
seem to be intensifying and even spreading to
neighbouring countries. The missions will also
contribute to the Council's better understanding of the
complex situations at hand and offer a valuable
opportunity for interaction with the various players on
the ground.
Within the framework of the Europe-Africa
dialogue, we have been working together to develop
common approaches to this issue. The Cairo Summit's
follow-up has indeed been showing our mutual
commitment to this endeavour.
The European Union has been constant in its
support of the efforts for regional and subregional
cooperation and has been actively engaged in various
relevant initiatives aimed at enhancing peacekeeping
capacities in Africa. We encourage a close relationship
between the United Nations and the African Union and
subregional organizations, inter alia, the Economic
Community of West African States, and we commend
the recent efforts of those organizations in the area of
peacekeeping operations in Africa.
The European Union also welcomes the efforts of
the Secretariat's Department of Peacekeeping
Operations to work closely with all relevant actors in
Africa at the regional, subregional and national levels,
in particular for the enhancement of the capabilities of
troop contributors and in capacity-building for regional
and subregional organizations. We welcome an active
role for the United Nations, specifically in the areas of
information-sharing, promoting transparency,
mobilizing support and stimulating contacts between
recipients and donors of assistance, for example, in
training, equipment and logistics.
The establishment of the African Union was a
particularly important development for the African
continent. It has created new opportunities for
strengthened economic cooperation, political
partnership and cultural exchange between our two
continents.
The European Union strongly welcomes the firm
commitment of the African Union to peace and
security. The decision taken at the African Union
summit in Durban in July 2002 to establish an African
Peace and Security Council and an African standby
force for conducting peace support operations is a
decisive and forward-looking step. The European
Union considers that its implementation, including the
swift ratification of the protocol relating to the
establishment of the Peace and Security Council in
order to ensure its timely entry into force, would be a
major achievement by the African Union member
States. The European Union stands ready to continue
its support geared towards strengthening African
conflict prevention and resolution capabilities, in
particular at the continental and regional levels.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that, in an
emerging new age of political and economic
development in Africa, the European Union will
continue to contribute to Africa in as many sectors as
possible and in every possible way, including through
improved cooperation here at the United Nations,
where the issue of promoting peace and security in
Africa must continue to receive the highest level of
priority and urgency.
The President: I thank the representative of
Greece for his kind words addressed to me.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Uruguay. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Paolillo (Uruguay) (spoke in Spanish): The
serious problems affecting the African continent must
be a matter of concern for all regions of the world.
They require the utmost attention from all of our
Governments, and they should be an absolute priority
on the agendas of international organizations.
We must undertake concerted and energetic
action to assist our brothers in Africa to overcome the
enormous obstacles that are impeding, and even
paralyzing, their efforts to achieve economic
development and democratization. Some of those
obstacles are the result of centuries of being subjected
to colonial rule, while others have resulted from long-
standing rivalries. Yet others stem from extreme
poverty and the precarious social conditions prevailing
in some regions of the continent. It is a moral duty to
assist Africa. If we do not carry out that duty, the rest
of the world will not be at peace with itself.
I wish to reiterate Uruguay's solidarity with all
the Governments and peoples of Africa, in particular
with those experiencing crises at this moment. We have
proven our solidarity by having participated for years
in peacekeeping missions in a number of countries,
including Mozambique, Angola, Rwanda, Sierra
Leone, Liberia, Eritrea, Western Sahara and the
Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The tragic events that have taken place in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo have gained
notoriety in recent days. Uruguay has been a part of the
United Nations peacekeeping force in that country
from the very beginning, with a contingent that
currently numbers more than 1,600 men. Among other
things, it was a naval unit from Uruguay that opened up
navigation and river communications in the Congo
River basin, which had been interrupted for over three
years.
I would like to convey to the members of the
Security Council the great concern of the Government
and people of Uruguay over the delicate situation in
which over 700 of our compatriots find themselves in
Bunia, where Uruguay agreed to have part of its troops
transferred in spite of the extreme danger in the region.
Uruguay has no economic interest in the area, or in the
Congo in general. Its presence in this unhappy country
is in keeping with moral principles and with putting
solidarity into action.
The situation of the civilian population and of the
Uruguayan forces in Bunia is simply terrible. On the
verge of a humanitarian catastrophe, and likely at any
moment to become the victims of unbridled and
mindless violence on the part of warring factions, the
lives of the inhabitants of Bunia and of the Uruguayans
attempting to protect them have become a nightmare
that has now lasted for several weeks.
The Security Council has just adopted a
desperately awaited resolution providing for the
deployment of an Emergency Multinational Force to
Bunia. Uruguay would like to express its gratitude to
the Council for having done so. I would also like to
thank the Governments of the countries that have
expressed their readiness to participate in the
Emergency Force, as well as to the Secretariat for its
efforts aimed at expediting the preparation and
deployment of the Force.
On behalf of my Government and of Uruguayans
whose lives and physical and mental integrity are
currently seriously under threat in Bunia, and on behalf
of all of Uruguay, I urge that measures be adopted
immediately to implement that resolution and to
proceed to the deployment of the Emergency Force to
Bunia as soon as possible, so as to restore calm,
provide security for the population and protect
everyone's lives. Any delay may be fatal for the
inhabitants of Bunia and for members of the United
Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, as well as - it must be said -
for the credibility and prestige of the Organization.
Mr. Boubacar Diallo (Guinea) (spoke in French): Allow me, first of all, to express my
delegation's appreciation to you, Mr. President, for the
determination, skill and mastery with which you have
guided the work of the Security Council during the
month of May. I would also like to thank you for
having organized this wrap-up meeting on the theme
"Conflicts in Africa: Security Council missions and
United Nations mechanisms to promote peace and
security". This very timely meeting it taking place as
this body is preparing to send two missions to Africa
next month - to Central Africa and to Western Africa,
two subregions shaken by ongoing conflicts that are
seriously threatening the peace and stability of the
countries in those regions.
In his opening statement this morning,
Ambassador Ibrahim Gambari, the Special Adviser of
the Secretary-General on Africa, provided a clear
indication of the stakes involved in the task ahead, as
well as of its scope. He also made some suggestions as
to how to improve upon our approach, for which my
delegation is grateful to him.
Our decision to send missions to Central and
Western Africa leaves no room for doubt about our
desire to contribute to the establishment of peace and
development in these sensitive areas of the continent. It
is up to us to benefit from those missions by making
the necessary contacts at the governmental level and
with political leaders and the civilian populations, so
that we may have an objective view of the situations
and their consequences and be able to refine our
methods of work to find appropriate solutions to the
various situations involved. The victims of conflict
desperately need this. They aspire only to calm and
security in order to focus their energies on improving
their welfare.
However, the Council cannot fully shoulder its
responsibilities unless it acts with the utmost
intelligence with regional and subregional actors,
whose importance and usefulness in the prevention,
management and resolution of conflicts no longer
needs to be demonstrated. That is why during our visits
we must take due note of the regional dimension, listen
closely to the points of view expressed by the various
actors and take a comprehensive approach in order to
contribute to a just and lasting settlement of the
conflicts.
In addition, my delegation would like to point out
that supporting the peace process necessarily requires
strengthening peacekeeping missions. In that regard,
we area pleased with the decisions taken by the
Council to establish a United Nations mission in Cote
d'Ivoire and to authorize the deployment of an Interim
Emergency Multinational Force in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo.
Furthermore, as a number of speakers have
pointed out, the Council must not lose sight of the
thorny issue of the proliferation and illegal circulation
of light weapons, which further fuels such hotbeds of
tension. A clear message must be sent by the two
Council missions to all who are involved in that
scourge, which is detrimental to the return to peace.
Combating mercenary activities, which are developing
at an alarming rate in West Africa, must not be
overlooked, either.
In conclusion, my delegation would like to
reaffirm its profound conviction that the Council
missions remain useful and very important exercises. It
is our duty to ensure that they are further invigorated
so that they can be more effective instruments in the
service of international peace and security.
The President: I thank the representative of
Guinea for his kind words addressed to me.
Mr. Mekdad (Syrian Arab Republic) (spoke in Arabic): Africa represents the conscience of the world
and its promising future. Africa stands for purity; it is
the symbol of giving. On its vast land numerous races
have come together, and through the determined efforts
of its peoples it has helped to enrich the human
heritage. On the basis of that understanding, my
delegation extends its profound gratitude to you,
Mr. President, and to your brotherly delegation, for
having convened this important meeting. We would
also like to thank Mr. Ibrahim Gambari, the Special
Adviser to the Secretary-General, for his important
statement.
We are deeply saddened to see a number of the
States of Africa plagued by conflicts, many of which
have been imposed upon them. Some of those conflicts
have been raging for many years and have had
unprecedented repercussions at the political, security,
economic, social and humanitarian levels. Peace and
security for the continent and its States are long
overdue; Africa should no longer be punished for its
rich endowment with natural resources and for its
racial and ethnic diversity.
In spite of efforts made at a number of levels to
resolve the problems faced by Africa, the desired
results have not been achieved. We would like from the
outset to reaffirm our belief that the international
community should pay greater attention to Africa and
should make a concerted effort to assist it in its
development and to rehabilitate it after the destruction
of the past few decades.
In recent years, the Security Council has spared
no effort in trying to tackle the crises that have
engulfed certain African countries. In an attempt to
deal with these crises, the Council has established 12
missions to support or establish peace in various States
on that continent. The Council's adoption this morning
of a resolution to dispatch a multinational emergency
force to the Ituri region of the Democratic Republic of
the Congo is further evidence of its active follow-up of
the developments in the countries of that continent.
Such attention on the part of the Council can be
placed within the context of interest shown by the other
bodies of the United Nations. The General Assembly
has made a notable effort, in particular by adopting the
New Partnership for Africa's Development. The
Economic and Social Council has also made a
significant effort, and we must not forget the very
important role played by Secretary-General Kofi
Annan personally or through his special envoys and
personal representatives in the region, to try to
reconcile differing points of view and put an end to
conflict and military confrontation with a view to
enabling the parties to implement the accords arrived at
and the resolutions of the Council.
Despite such measures to resolve conflict and
build peace, we believe that the international effort
must be given further impetus. The Security Council
recently dispatched missions to several States,
including in southern Africa, East Africa and the Great
Lakes region. The positive results of those missions
have been reflected in the subsequent development of
events. In this regard, we hope that the two
forthcoming Council missions to Central and West
Africa will be able to discharge the mandates assigned
to them so that the desired results can be achieved.
Direct meetings between the members of the two
missions and the leaders of about 12 States suffering
from, or directly or indirectly involved in, such
conflicts will be beneficial. The leaders of those States
and the leaders of rival organizations must heed the
call of the international community to end all forms of
destruction and to all hostilities. This will be especially
beneficial if accompanied by a firm stance with regard
to those who circumvent the resolutions of
international legitimacy or are reluctant to implement
such resolutions.
Syria welcomed the establishment of the African
Union and the start of work by its subsidiary bodies. It
also supports the efforts being made by the Union to
settle conflicts in Africa. We acknowledge in particular
the role of the presidency of the African Union, South
Africa, in this regard. We also welcome regional and
subregional efforts to resolve conflicts in the States of
that continent, especially the efforts of the Economic
Community of West African States, as well as those of
other regional organizations, such as the Economic and
Monetary Community of Central Africa and the
Intergovernmental Authority on Development.
Syria calls upon the international community to
enhance the material capabilities of African regional
organizations so that they can effectively discharge
their mandates. Experience has shown that we need to
deal with African conflicts holistically and on a broad
regional basis, given the fact that most neighbouring
States are involved in the causes of the conflicts and
need to be involved in the solutions. In this regard, we
welcome the significant role played by the leaders of
the African States to organize and mediate meetings
with the goal of settling conflicts peacefully and of
rebuilding mutual confidence and relations among
States.
We reaffirm the need to deal with the root causes
of conflict in Africa. We greatly appreciate the
importance of the work of the Council's Ad Hoc
Working Group on Conflict Prevention and Resolution
in Africa and the need to put its recommendations into
effect. A vital role should also be played by the
international donor bodies and organizations, whose
assistance in the reconstruction in Africa is of great
importance.
As a member of the Security Council, Syria has
sought to focus close attention on the problems facing
Africa. Syria has called upon the international
community in the past, and calls upon it today, to spare
no effort to put an end to the conflicts ravaging
numerous African States. We earnestly hope that,
together, we will manage to fulfil the promise we made
to Africa to help it to overcome its difficulties and
continue to enrich human civilization and human
progress.
The President: I thank the representative of the
Syrian Arab Republic for his kind words addressed to
me.
The next speaker on my list is the representative
of the Philippines. On behalf of the Council, I welcome
him to the United Nations. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Baja (Philippines): It is my pleasure to
address the Security Council for the first time and my
honour to do so under Pakistan's presidency and on an
issue that is central to the work of the Council.
My delegation is likewise pleased to congratulate
you, Sir, and your team on Pakistan's outstanding
leadership of the Council this month, highlighted by
the adoption of resolution 1483 (2003). We also
congratulate Mexico on its commendable presidency
last month.
My delegation also wishes to thank Under-
Secretary-General Ibrahim Gambari for his statement
this morning.
This Security Council meeting is timely, coming
as it does two days before the G-8 summit to be chaired
by France, which will address the issue of the New
Partnership for Africa's Development as one of its
themes. It is also important coming on the eve of the
two Security Council missions to Central and West
Africa, to be led by France and the United Kingdom,
respectively.
In recent weeks, the Security Council has
demonstrated its unswerving commitment to
safeguarding peace and security in Africa. The
adoption of resolution 1479 (2003), which established
the United Nations Mission in Cote d'Ivoire, and this
morning's adoption of resolution 1484 (2003)
authorizing the deployment of a temporary Interim
Emergency Multinational Force in Bunia under the
leadership of France, speak significantly loud and clear
of the Council's determination to directly address
conflicts in Africa.
The response of the Security Council to the
Ivorian and Bunia crises and the role of the Economic
Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in
facilitating the peace process in Cote d'Ivoire and of
the troop-contributing countries in the establishment of
an Interim Emergency Multinational Force in Bunia are
examples of cooperation which bear highlighting.
In this context, my delegation proposes the
following, which we believe will further strengthen the
resolution of conflicts in Africa.
First, Security Council partnership with regional
groups in Africa, notably ECOWAS and the African
Union, should be fully harnessed. In particular, the
newly established African Union Mechanism for
Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution
offers rich resources to complement the efforts of the
Council in conflict resolution.
Secondly, Security Council missions to conflict
areas have contributed to a better understanding of the
issues. They have been useful in facilitating the peace
process and should be carried out with increased
collaboration with relevant regional groups on the
ground. In this context, my delegation strongly
supports the regional approach of the Council in
dealing with specific conflicts in Africa through the
forthcoming Council missions. We hope that these
missions will be successful in accomplishing their
objectives.
Thirdly, an integrated approach that will bring
together all relevant United Nations actors involved in
conflict prevention, conflict resolution and post-
conflict reconstruction should be consistently adopted
in dealing with conflict situations in Africa. We
welcome the trend towards strengthened cooperation
between the Security Council and the Economic and
Social Council in this area. In this regard, my
delegation wishes to note the success of the Ad Hoc
Advisory Group on Guinea-Bissau. Other mechanisms,
such as the Security Council Ad Hoc Working Group
on Conflict Prevention and Resolution in Africa, the
Group of Friends and the special representatives of the
Secretary-General can also contribute to this integrated
approach.
We believe that the Africans themselves have the
capacity to play the key role in promoting peace and
security in their region, and the international
community should support them in these efforts.
Through the promotion of peace and security in Africa,
the economic development and progress of the region
are also enhanced.
Finally, important as conflict resolution may be,
my delegation emphasizes the need to focus and
develop appropriate conflict-prevention strategies as
priority measures to promote peace and security in
Africa and in all regions, for that matter.
The President: I thank the representative of the
Philippines for his kind words addressed to me.
The next speaker on my list is the representative
of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. I invite him
to take a seat at the Council table and to make his
statement.
Mr. Ileka (Democratic Republic of the Congo) (spoke in French): Now that your presidency of the
Security Council for this month is drawing to an end,
Sir, allow me to express my delegation's satisfaction
with the outstanding manner in which you have carried
out your noble mission and to pay tribute to your skills
and competence.
My delegation fully endorses the statement made
by the representative of the sisterly Republic of the
Congo, who, with his customary clarity and eloquence,
gave, on behalf of the countries of the Economic
Community of Central African States, an outline of
developments in our community in the area of peace
and security. My delegation will therefore limit its
statement to the situation in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo.
While we sincerely thank the Security Council for
keeping the situation in our country among its
priorities, we take this opportunity also to express our
gratitude for this morning's unanimous response to the
request of the Secretary-General to deploy as soon as
possible a multinational force in Bunia with a view to
helping a return to normalcy in Ituri, a district of
Orientale province of the Democratic Republic of the
Congo that has been stricken, for the second time in
just a few months, by the misdeeds of the forces of
evil. Orchestrated by two neighbouring countries, the
events in Bunia are strikingly similar to those we have
seen in Kisangani, where the regular armies of those
same two countries clashed on several occasions with
heavy weapons, claiming thousands of victims. The
sheer numbers of callous warlords in Ituri, like those
further south in the provinces of Nord-Kivu, Sud-Kivu
and Maniema, are of such great concern that some are
now even talking about the "Somalization" of that part
of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Worse still,
the atrocities enable us to draw a certain parallel to
other events, such as those carried out about 10 years
ago in Rwanda, where a terrible genocide occurred.
Broadcasts by Thomas Lubanga's Radio Candip remind
us quite starkly of those aired by Radio Mille Collines
of such sad memory.
Ituri is but one symptom of the general situation
in the country. Recent massacres there compound a
long and macabre list of massive violations of human
rights and of international humanitarian law since the
outbreak of the war of aggression on 2 August 1998.
Ituri is just a new catastrophe in the Congolese tragedy.
There are hundreds of verified deaths, thousands of
internally displaced persons and thousands of people
living in subhuman conditions in and around MONUC
areas, where they are seeking refuge under the
protection of Uruguayan troops, who have done
excellent work. My delegation cannot fail to recall that
members of the international community have paid a
heavy price. Two representatives of the Red Cross and
two MONUC officers, far from their families, fully
committed to the cause of returning peace and dignity
to our country, were savagely murdered. Their bodies
were found mutilated beyond what one can imagine.
In the light of all those atrocities, it is important
that the international community's message not be
hampered by ambiguity. The message must be made
clear, and the Security Council must send a strong
signal to those who commit such atrocities. For
example, those responsible for the murders committed
on 14 and 15 May 2002 in Kisangani - whose names
are in official United Nations reports - are still
moving about freely and continue to attend to their
business. In such cases, how can a potential violator of
human rights and of international humanitarian law not
feel safe to commit another crime if he knows
beforehand that, after committing it, not only will he
go unpunished, but perhaps he might even benefit from
a minor perquisite or a bonus, granted on the altar of
peace.
That is the case with Thomas Lubanga, a former
inmate of the central prison of Makala, in Kinshasa,
and a well-known criminal and terrorist. Are we to
consider him for what he really is - I repeat, a
criminal - or are we to lay out the red carpet for him?
At a time when the Security Council is resolutely
committed to the stabilization of Ituri and, therefore, of
the entire Democratic Republic of the Congo and the
whole Great Lakes region, Ituri will undoubtedly be an
important test of the will of the nation and of the
international community.
In the context of the partnership that has
fortunately been forged among the Security Council,
the African Union and the parties involved or
interested in the conflict in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo, the Council has taken the initiative of
dispatching a mission to the region on a regular basis.
We note with satisfaction that every Council mission
visit has given rise to notable progress in the peace
process. We are convinced that the same will apply to
the mission to Central Africa, which we will have the
signal honour to host in a few days' time in Kinshasa.
The challenges are immense, certainly, but they are not
insurmountable.
In the immediate future, particular emphasis
should be placed on the implementation of the
transition and on the completion of the ongoing peace
process. The cessation of hostilities throughout the
national territory - more particularly in the east - is
crucial in order to enable the Transitional Government
to establish its authority, in conformity with the
relevant Security Council resolutions with the Lusaka
Agreement and with other subsequent partial
agreements.
The reforms envisaged by the Transitional
Constitution deserve to be supported. Reform of the
army - a crucial attribute of the sovereignty and
defence of national territory - must be supported and
accelerated, particularly in the context of the swift
formation of an inclusive and republican army. Reform
of the judicial system, for its part, should be a priority
so that we can deal with the thorny question of the
administration of justice and impunity. The millions of
Congolese men and women who have suffered
grievously from armed aggression and from atrocities
committed by warlords are demanding justice. They
cannot be denied it.
The Ituri Pacification Commission's resolutions
also deserve to be supported unreservedly. They must
be fully implemented. However, it should be pointed
out that the tasks of pacification, reconciliation and
respect for law and order are functions that belong to a
governmental entity. Therefore, the capacities of the
Transitional Government deserve to be strengthened to
that effect.
In the short and medium term, the concepts of
disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and
repatriation (DDRR) and disarmament, demobilization,
reintegration and repatriation or resettlement (DDRRR)
should be rethought if we wish them to be truly
effective. Naturally, they should pertain to the groups
mentioned in the annexes to the Lusaka Agreement, but
they should also extend to those that were created
recently, some of which are fighting in Ituri. It is also
essential to create a viable mechanism to halt the
circulation of small arms and light weapons, which
creates situations of instability, veritable breeding
grounds for all kinds of criminal, organized crime and
terrorist networks. In that connection, we followed
with much interest the views expressed this afternoon
by the delegations of Germany, Bulgaria and Guinea.
We must also put an end to the illegal
exploitation of natural resources. Such resources are
ultimately a curse for the countries that by chance
possess them. Those countries, including ours, are
extremely poor and represent nearly all of the world's
conflicts. In parallel, it would be useful to combine the
region's various peace processes in a comprehensive
approach. The Arusha process, for Burundi, is well
under way and seems to be on the right path. The
Lusaka process, for the Democratic Republic of the
Congo, is irreversible. We hope that both processes
succeed and that a free and democratic space is created.
That will be good for the Great Lakes region. Then it
will be important that the region's two other countries
take into account the efforts undoubtedly being
undertaken with a view to genuine democracy,
reconciliation and national harmony.
Over the long term, the organization and
convening of an international conference on peace and
security in the Great Lakes region is becoming an
absolute necessity. Such a conference, from our point
of view, would be the most viable forum for laying the
foundations for new relations marked by respect and
trust among the region's countries. Once peace is
restored, Congolese men and women will not fail to
share with the world their vision of what they intend to
accomplish for the happiness of present and future
generations. We hope to share and to realize our dream
with the assistance of you, the members of the
international community.
Before I conclude, my delegation would like to
ask the Security Council to be so kind as to express to
the Secretary-General our gratitude for his tireless
efforts to restore peace in our country. We are grateful
to him for his recent initiative and take this opportunity
to sincerely thank, again through you, Mr. President,
all the countries that decided to respond favourably to
it in one form or another. These thanks for the
Council's tireless and unfailing commitment to the
Congolese people will be reiterated in several days'
time by the Republic's most authorized spokesman.
Mr. Wang Yingfan (China) (spoke in Chinese): I
should like to begin by thanking you, Mr. President, for
convening this wrap-up meeting to discuss Security
Council missions to Africa and United Nations
promotion of peace and security in Africa. We also
wish to thank Ambassador Gambari, Special
Representative of the Secretary-General, for his
statement.
Recently, the situation in Central Africa -
particularly in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo - has become extremely worrisome; the peace
process there faces a number of challenges. In West
Africa, the peace in Sierra Leone must still be
consolidated, the conflict in Liberia has yet to be
resolved and the situation in Cote d'Ivoire is still beset
with destabilizing factors. The Security Council
missions to those two regions in June are both
necessary and timely. We hope that they will play an
effective role in promoting the peace processes in both
regions.
In recent years, the Security Council has been
actively engaged in the prevention and resolution of
conflicts and in the consolidation of peace. It has made
some headway, but it has also faced difficulties and
problems. Today I wish to dwell on one question,
namely, the importance of putting the maintenance of
peace and security on a sound economic and financial
footing.
The African continent is richly endowed with
natural resources. This is true of both the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and Sierra Leone. However, due
to various factors, economic and financial security
often becomes a sticking point in the process of ending
conflicts and rebuilding peace.
Indeed, the inability to procure adequate
economic and financial resources has a negative effect
on the promotion of peace processes. In this respect, it
should be noted that, in recent years, cooperation
between the United Nations and international financial
institutions, including the World Bank, has been
stepped up, and that coordination among various
organs of the United Nations system - for instance,
between the Security Council and the Economic and
Social Council - has also been enhanced.
Insufficient funding during peace processes
remains a difficult problem. For example, the
Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS), through its peacekeeping operation in
Cote d'Ivoire, has played an instrumental role in
stabilizing the situation in the country. However, the
peacekeeping operation is strapped for cash. In Sierra
Leone, the process of demobilization, disarmament and
reintegration of ex-combatants has been stalled by the
lack of funding.
Following the end of conflicts and the
achievement of peace, countries still face serious
difficulties, which may become new triggers for a
further round of turmoil. For example, in Guinea-
Bissau the relevant peace agreements are being
implemented, but the grave economic difficulties it
faces threaten to plunge it into another war.
Economic and financial guarantees therefore
represent a serious issue for the Security Council in its
task of preventing and managing and forestalling the
recurrence of conflicts in Africa.
The United Nations, including the Security
Council, should strive for effective solutions to enable
the Organization to enhance its capacity for the
maintenance of international peace and security.
The President: I thank Ambassador Wang
Yingfan for the kind words he addressed to me.
Mr. Konuzin (Russian Federation) (spoke in Russian): We are grateful to the President of the
Security Council for putting forward for consideration
at this month's wrap-up meeting of the Council the
topic of conflicts in Africa, with a view to the dispatch
to that continent of two Council missions. Our
discussions have made clear the great practicality and
usefulness of such an action. The exchange of views
that took place today will certainly help members of
the Security Council in their work during the course of
their trip to Africa.
Russia agrees with the general conviction as to
the link between peace and development. We support
the elaboration of a comprehensive and thorough
approach to the settlement and prevention of conflicts
and to the elimination of poverty, with a view to
ensuring development and the strengthening of
democracy on the African continent. We believe that
priority should be accorded to the use of political and
diplomatic methods and to the overcoming of obstacles
that could contribute to the emergence and continuation
of conflicts. There can be no doubt that the Africans
themselves must play a key role in this respect.
Russia is actively participating in peacekeeping
efforts in Africa; Russian representatives are involved
in all United Nations peacekeeping operations on the
continent.
Africa has not been spared new challenges and
threats. It is important that in its approach to these
problems, the Security Council act with the same
determination and serious-mindedness as it does in
other regions. Double standards are inadmissible. This
idea has already been expressed in this Chamber by the
representative of Malaysia, and we support it.
The planned Security Council missions will have
to cope with and evaluate a fresh threat to the African
continent: the spread of illegal armed groups. Often
these groups pose a threat to the constitutional
foundation, and even the very existence, of sovereign
States. This was stated eloquently earlier in the
meeting by the representative of the Congo,
Mr. Ikouebe.
In many cases, these groups have no programme
whatsoever, save their desire to seize power at any
cost. The price for this can be many tens of thousands
of peaceful African lives. Since these groups plunder
and rape and kill the civilian population, how do they
differ from terrorists? Today's statement by the
Permanent Representative of Burundi, Mr. Nteturuye,
shows that the Africans themselves hold such views.
Quite frequently armed groups are manipulated
from abroad and become an extension of the interests
of neighbouring countries. This phenomenon has
become regional in nature, and poses a threat to
international peace and security. With a view to
averting the worst-case scenario, Governments must
engage in contacts with these armed groups and make
compromises within the framework of an intra-national
dialogue. This is explainable and understandable, and
each situation requires individual consideration.
Nevertheless, such an approach leads to the
legalization of the rebels and to a situation whereby,
instead of resorting to constitutional means of
resolving internal problems, a choice is made in favour
of violence.
The question of border security requires a fresh
approach. For historical reasons, African borders have
always been porous. This has allowed them to retain
the ethnic linkages of tribes and has helped in border
cooperation.
Now, however, the permeability and vulnerability
of borders has in many cases become the reason for the
spillover of conflict situations, unrestricted flows of
illegal arms, smuggling, trans-border crime, the illegal
export of natural resources and the movement of armed
groups and mercenaries.
The Security Council missions should draw
attention to this problem, which could lead to further
destabilization in various African regions. Russia
supports the efforts undertaken by the United Nations
to strengthen Africa's peacekeeping potential and the
establishment of an effective partnership and of
cooperation in the area of the maintenance of peace.
Of great promise is cooperation among the
African peacekeeping structures with the Group of
Eight. We agree with the views expressed in this regard
by the Ambassador of Germany, Ambassador Pleuger.
We note with satisfaction the intensification of
peacekeeping efforts on the part of the African Union
and such subregional organizations as the Economic
Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
and the Inter-Government Authority on Development
(IGAD).
We welcome the major contribution to
peacekeeping made by a great number of African
States. However, we are concerned that, in some cases,
the assessments of the Security Council and African
institutions do not coincide. As well, the requests of
our partners in Africa do not always find support on the
Council.
In that connection, we agree with the proposal
made by the Chairman of the Group of African States,
the Permanent Representative of Mauritius,
Mr. Koonjul, to hold consultations between the
Security Council and the African Union. We support
the views expressed by the representative of Angola,
Mr. Gaspar Martins, on cooperation with subregional
organizations. We should heed the view of the
Economic Community of Central African States on the
mandate for the United Nations Organization Mission
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as expressed
today by the representative of the Republic of the
Congo, Mr. Ikouebe.
A number of delegations referred today to
sanctions as a way of dealing with those who violate
international peace and security. Sanctions are a very
powerful weapon, and sanctions regimes can be
imposed by the Security Council alone. Such regimes
are inadmissible when, as one group of United Nations
experts recently reported, those targeted are unaware
they are the object of sanctions. The Security Council
must carefully follow up on the implementation of its
own resolutions. During its trip to West Africa, the
Security Council will be able to see to what extent its
sanctions regimes have been effective in the case of
certain States of the region.
The Security Council regularly examines post-
conflict recovery situations in various African States.
We are concerned about the gaps and complications
that have arisen in some cases: the military coup in the
Central African Republic and difficulties in the post-
conflict process in Guinea-Bissau. We hope that in the
latter case the Security Council mission will be able to
make a constructive contribution to a smooth
continuation of that process. We believe that the
Security Council missions to Central and West Africa
will be able to get a first-hand view of the humanitarian
situation in conflict zones.
The information coming in shows that in those
areas, there exists heinous, merciless cruelty towards
the civilian population. Senseless killings are being
carried out with machetes, which have become a
weapon of mass destruction. We are observing a
phenomenon that is incompatible with civilization in
the twenty-first century. Child combatants are drawn
into endless violence. Security Council missions must
send a clear signal to the parties concerned: those who
commit crimes against humanity will inexorably be
brought to justice. The guilty will be punished for the
crimes they have committed. We support the statement
in that regard from the representative of the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mr. Ileka. The
blood and ashes of innocent victims make this our duty.
Virtually all African conflicts have a regional
dimension. The positions of neighbours and other
regional factors to a great extent determine the success
or failure of international efforts to settle those
conflicts. Russia proposes that during the Security
Council mission to Central Africa we sound out the
views of the States of the Great Lakes region on the
idea of adopting a declaration on good neighbourliness,
which could then be transformed into a good-
neighbourliness pact. As we see it, work on such a
document would promote mutual understanding among
the States in that part of the African continent, help to
solve ongoing problems and strengthen trust among the
States. It could be an important step in preparing for
the international conference on the Great Lakes region.
There are no quick fixes for the enormous
problems of settling African conflicts. We need
multifaceted, painstaking efforts both from the friends
of Africa and, first and foremost, from Africans
themselves. We hope that the forthcoming Security
Council missions to the continent, in accordance with
the mandates approved, will help to formulate solutions
to those conflicts and to face new challenges and
threats to Africa.
The President: The next speaker inscribed on my
list is the representative of Rwanda. I invite him to take
a seat at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Kamanzi (Rwanda): On behalf of my
delegation, I would like to take this opportunity to
extend to you, Mr. President, my sincere thanks for
convening this important meeting on peace and conflict
in Africa. I would also like to congratulate you on the
remarkable job done by the Security Council in the
course of the month of May, during your tenure.
Moreover, my delegation expresses its high
appreciation for the assessment and recommendations
made this morning by Ambassador Gambari. My
delegation also fully endorses the statement made by
the representative of the Congo on behalf of Central
African countries on the evolution of the pacification
process in the area.
These last months have witnessed the awful and
sad events that took place in eastern Democratic
Republic of the Congo, where numerous innocent
civilians were disgracefully massacred or forced into
displacement and subsequent misery. Those events
happened at a time when the Congolese had just agreed
upon a political framework for putting in place
transitional structures aimed at achieving long-lasting
peace and security for the people of the country and for
the neighbouring countries.
The magnitude of those events requires that the
international community provide unconditional support
to all the Congolese parties in this process towards
achieving durable peace. A substantial commitment
from the international community is indeed needed to
help the people of the Democratic Republic of the
Congo to build trust among themselves and to strive for
national unity.
In this regard, the Government of Rwanda
appreciates Secretary-General Kofi Annan's
noteworthy initiative of carrying out consultations for
the deployment of a neutral multinational force, whose
main mission is to bring relief to the population of Ituri
and to prevent a further humanitarian catastrophe in the
region.
Those populations have indeed been suffering as
a result of the chaotic and unsafe situation favoured by
the absence of the appropriate dynamic in
implementing the Lusaka and Pretoria political
frameworks. The Government of Rwanda advocates
that the multinational force be a strong support for the
pacification process without interfering with the
Lusaka and Pretoria frameworks, which constitute a
pivotal reference for the restoration of durable peace
and security for the Democratic Republic of the Congo
and for all the other countries in the Great Lakes
region.
The Government of Rwanda also welcomes the
forthcoming mission of the Security Council to Central
Africa, which is to take place in the course of June.
This is a crucial step in giving impetus to the
pacification process taking place in the countries of the
Great Lakes region, especially in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and Burundi. The mission
should seek to help the Congolese protagonists to
identify ways and means to overcome the outstanding
impediments to putting in place national and integrated
transitional structures. A strong appeal to the various
Congolese parties, especially the Government in place
in Kinshasa, to show more political will and openness
would be very valuable in rescuing the good results
achieved so far through the remarkable regional and
international peace initiatives undertaken for the
Democratic Republic of the Congo.
As far as Burundi is concerned, the Government
of Rwanda would like to express its wish to see the
Security Council mission contribute to strengthening
the mechanisms for the implementation of the Arusha
peace accords so as to achieve a speedy restoration of
peace all over the territory of Burundi.
Recommendations regarding the African mission in
Burundi should be made in the vein of consolidating its
efficiency on the ground for the utmost security and
good of the people of Burundi.
The President: I thank the representative of
Rwanda for his kind words addressed to me.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of Tunisia. I invite him to take a seat at
the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. Hachani (Tunisia) (spoke in French): Allow
me, first of all, to congratulate you, Mr. President, for
the excellent manner in which Pakistan and you
yourself have guided the work of the Security Council
during the month of May. You proposed an agenda that
took into account the varied interests of the Security
Council with regard to the maintenance of international
peace and security.
During their respective presidencies of the
Council, many delegations have initiated important
thematic debates. That has made possible an exchange
of views and a broadening of the concept of
international peace and security. The outcome of those
various discussions should serve the Council as a
reference in approaching the issues it takes up. The fact
that several non-members of the Council take part in
this exhaustive exercise is a positive sign that the
Council should take advantage of.
The relevance of the theme put forth by the
President for the Council's discussion today should
also be highlighted, especially as it enables us to
consider as much as possible tension and conflict
situations in their regional and subregional contexts
and to ensure that there is greater interaction between
the Council and subregional actors in the quest for
solutions to problems.
It is reassuring to note that conflicts in Africa are
the subject of constant follow-up by the Security
Council, and that sustained and sincere efforts are
being made by all members to alleviate as much as
possible the political, economic and social ills that
afflict our continent. However, it is important that the
Council's commitment to Africa be enhanced even
further. It would perhaps be appropriate for the Council
to occasionally carry out an evaluation - as it is doing
today - of its own actions with regard to ongoing and
increasingly complicated African conflicts in order to
lay out the real problems and, if necessary, explore new
avenues that may provide the most favourable solutions
for those problems.
The missions to be carried out by the Security
Council to two African regions next month are in
several respects innovative initiatives. They are to be
welcomed, as they make possible direct involvement in
helping the parties to conflicts to negotiate a peaceful
and speedy solution to their disputes.
The recognition of the interdependence of the
situations in the Central and Western African
subregions, as well as of the role played by the African
Union and other African participants, is a good
illustration of the way in which we should proceed so
that Council may effectively become aware of
subregional machinery falling within the framework of
Chapter VIII of the Charter. In developing their
relations, the United Nations and the African Union
have already established machinery for consultation
and cooperation aimed at improving the joint efforts of
the two organizations, in particular in the areas of
maintaining peace and preventing conflict. In that
regard, it is important to emphasize that the efforts and
initiatives to be carried out should be based on
parameters established by African States themselves in
pursuance of the principles and objectives of the
African Union and in close cooperation with the
Security Council.
Similarly, and given the fact that the activities of
the United Nations and of the African Union
complement each another in the maintenance of peace
and in preventing conflict, we believe that it is
essential that the international community give all due
importance to strengthening Africa's capacity through
substantial material and financial support for the
Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management and
Resolution in Africa.
Tunisia has constantly strengthened its
participation in peace efforts carried out by the
Security Council. We believe those efforts should be
part of a comprehensive approach that takes into
account political, social and economic aspects. In
particular, it should take into account the close linkage
among development, peace and security. It is therefore
important for my country to see the development of an
international strategy that is based on integrated steps
and that makes it possible to address the deep-rooted
causes of conflict, such as poverty and exclusion. Such
an approach requires greater involvement by
development bodies and an emphasis on quick-impact
programmes that can contribute to helping populations
emerging from conflict to resume normal lives.
It is for that reason that we believe that we must
continue to insist on the need for the Security Council
to authorize the participation of countries affected by
conflict, United Nations actors and others in the
preparation, expansion and renewal of the mandates of
United Nations missions. That would make it possible
to take into consideration their views and
reconstruction expertise, as well as the urgent needs of
countries in conflict, thereby guaranteeing the success
of those missions.
The President: I thank the representative of
Tunisia for his kind words addressed to me.
The next speaker inscribed on my list is the
representative of the United Republic of Tanzania. I
invite her to take a seat at the Council table and to
make her statement.
Mrs. Mulamula (United Republic of Tanzania): I
am all for breaking the monotony of your duties,
Mr. President, by mainstreaming the female agenda,
and especially by participating in today's debate.
My delegation is grateful to you, Mr. President,
for organizing this meeting on conflicts in Africa, a
subject of great concern to our continent. Indeed,
Tanzania recognizes and appreciates Pakistan's
contribution to United Nations peacekeeping
operations in Africa.
The fact that this meeting is being held the day
after we observed the first International Day of United
Nations Peacekeepers is in itself laudable. Allow me to
pay tribute to the more than 1,800 peacekeepers who
have lost their lives serving in United Nations
peacekeeping operations.
In the recent past, Africa has occupied no less
than 60 per cent of the Security Council's agenda.
While that is not a source of pride for Africa, it is a
demonstration of the Council's commitment to
resolving what seem to be endless conflicts in our
continent. We commend the Council for having
succeeded in restoring peace in Sierra Leone and in
Ethiopia and Eritrea.
Those achievements notwithstanding, conflicts in
Africa rage unabated, causing millions of deaths,
displacing civilians, separating families and
devastating economies, to say nothing of the
destruction to property and infrastructure that they
cause.
It is not my intention to revisit the root causes of
conflict in Africa. The Secretary-General's
comprehensive report of April 1998 (S/1998/318) and
subsequent reports have resulted in resolutions being
adopted by the Security Council and the General
Assembly. It is important, however, always to bear in
mind that, without addressing the root causes, it will
not be easy to resolve the conflicts afflicting the
African continent.
In this context, my delegation wishes to remind
the Council that it should attach the greatest
importance to the implementation of, inter alia, the
Millennium Development Goals, the Monterrey
Consensus and the conclusions of the World Summit on
Sustainable Development, held last year in
Johannesburg. Poverty eradication remains an
overarching priority if we are to achieve durable peace
and sustainable development.
If words were deeds, Africa could be sailing
through a conflict-free environment, since so many
statements, proposals, resolutions and action plans
have been put forward in this Chamber. The question
before us, therefore, is how much we have achieved as
a consequence of the numerous meetings and debates
that have been held and the resulting statements and
resolutions. I believe that the search for an answer to
that question underlines the significance of today's
debate.
The situation in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo remains unresolved, despite the achievements
on the political front. The Security Council must act,
and act swiftly, if we are to avoid a genocidal and
humanitarian catastrophe in the eastern Democratic
Republic of the Congo - the troubled region of Ituri.
While we welcome today's action by the Council in
authorizing the deployment of a multinational force to
Bunia, that, as specifically set out in the resolution
adopted earlier, is an interim measure. It is our hope
that the Secretary-General will be able to deploy a
more robust and effective force to effectively deal with
the situation on the ground so as to ensure the
restoration of lasting peace and stability in the whole of
the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The killings in
Bunia are a sad testimony to the inept mandate of the
United Nations Organization Mission in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC). Any
future mandate given to MONUC short of Chapter VII
of the Charter, as envisaged in the Lusaka Accord,
would fail the Congolese people, on whose behalf that
peace agreement was signed.
The commitment of the Government of the
United Republic Tanzania to the restoration of peace in
the Great Lakes region needs no elaboration. Tanzania
recently signed a MONUC status-of-mission agreement
with the Department of Peacekeeping Operations as
part of our effort to strengthen and facilitate the
effective presence of MONUC in peace-building efforts
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The smooth transfer of power of the transitional
Government in Burundi was a matter of great
satisfaction for Tanzania. Tanzania thus welcomes the
decision of the Council to send a mission - including
a visit to Tanzania - to the region, which will allow
Council members, inter alia, to assess the situation on
the ground and to obtain first-hand information from
the parties. Hopefully, the visit will convince the
Council to take further concrete measures in advancing
the peace process and to seriously attempt to find a
lasting solution to end the conflicts raging in the region
and to achieve durable peace and stability.
In welcoming the forthcoming mission of the
Council to our region, I would like to take this
opportunity to assure you, Mr. President, of Tanzania's
unwavering commitment to, continued support for and
cooperation in efforts towards the restoration of lasting
peace in the Great Lakes region.
Finally, we would like to call upon the Council to
gather up the necessary political will and implement
fully all that it has committed itself to doing in Africa
through its several resolutions and presidential
statements. We have confidence that a determined
Security Council can bring results that will be in the
interests of lasting peace and stability in Africa and, in
particular, in the Great Lakes region.
The President: I thank the representative of the
United Republic of Tanzania for her kind words
addressed to me.
I would now like to make a few remarks in my
national capacity.
I would like at the outset to express Pakistan's
thanks and gratitude to all members of the Council,
non-Council members and other speakers for their
participation in today's meetings. I am especially
grateful to Mr. Ibrahim Gambari, Special Adviser to
the Secretary-General, for his enlightening statement. I
would also like to thank Ambassador De La Sabliere
and Ambassador Greenstock for their statements and
for agreeing to lead the two Security Council missions
to Central Africa and West Africa, respectively.
Pakistan wishes those two important missions every
success.
The remarks that have been made in our
discussion by representatives from Africa have
enhanced our understanding of the situation on the
continent. Clearly, Africa faces imposing challenges
posed by hunger, disease and poverty, as well as by the
conflicts that are continuing in various parts of the
continent, with grave consequences in terms of human
suffering, instability and pervasive underdevelopment.
The causes of the conflicts are complex: ethnic
and national rivalries, the illegal exploitation of natural
resources, foreign intervention, the proliferation of
small arms and light weapons, the use of mercenaries
and child soldiers, human rights violations, refugee
movements and internal displacement, as well as the
spread of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS.
The root cause of many of the conflicts is, above all,
pervasive poverty and hunger, and the representative of
Tanzania provided a timely reminder to the Council of
the importance of the implementation of the
Millennium Development Goals and the Monterrey
Consensus.
The illegal exploitation of the natural resources of
African countries fuels these conflicts. The control of
resource-rich areas appears to be a major military
objective of most of the warring groups, rebel
movements and Governments alike. We have had
conflict diamonds in the case of West Africa and, now,
conflict timber in the case of Liberia. Next, we may
perhaps be dealing with conflict gold or platinum, and
the list could be endless.
The Security Council must adopt an active
approach designed to create peace in Africa. The
approach of the Council should be comprehensive and
it should aim at durable solutions. Clearly, such durable
solutions would need to encompass several aspects.
First, they must generate ownership of the
solutions by the parties concerned. Secondly, they must
be accompanied by the political will of those who
support peace at the domestic, national, regional and
international levels. Thirdly, these solutions must be
accompanied by the provision of adequate resources
and financial assistance for the purposes of peace-
building and peace sustenance. In the long term, the
best solutions for conflicts would be the integration of
these nations and regions into the world system of
trade and finance on an equitable and sustainable basis.
Fourthly, such solutions must encompass humanitarian
action and respect for humanitarian law. Fifthly, they
should be accompanied by disarmament,
demobilization and reintegration actions, which have
been successful in many cases in the recent past. They
must encourage regional approaches, since many of the
conflicts are interlinked and interdependent. Lastly,
such solutions must be based on the determination of
the Security Council to implement its decisions and to
ensure that agreements that are concluded are adhered
to by the parties concerned. The Council's sanctions
can be targeted and can be made more effective to
ensure such results.
The Council could also consider enhancing the
effectiveness of the mechanisms which it deploys for
the resolution of conflicts. First, the mechanism of the
special representatives of the Secretary-General have
proved to be valuable not only in Africa, but elsewhere
as well, and these must receive full support from the
Security Council. Secondly, the Security Council's
missions, such as the two which are going to West and
Central Africa, are also increasingly useful in bringing
home to the Council the realities of the conflicts and in
bringing home to those parties concerned the attention
and focus of the Security Council on these conflicts.
Thirdly, peacekeeping operations, in Africa as
elsewhere, must be accompanied by a robust mandate
and adequate resources.
Pakistan, which has participated actively in
peacekeeping operations in Sierra Leone, Africa and
elsewhere, supports the strengthening of the mandate
and the size of the United Nations Organization
Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to
effectively achieve its objectives. We welcome the
adoption of the resolution on the Democratic Republic
of the Congo this morning for the deployment of the
Interim Emergency Multinational Force, to which
Pakistan will positively consider contributing a
contingent with a robust force to achieve the objectives
for which the Multinational Force has been established.
We would suggest consideration of two new
possible mechanisms by the Security Council. First, the
Council could create enquiry bodies to establish the
facts in the case of certain crises. These enquiry bodies
could work along the lines of the Counter-Terrorism
Committee in order to trace the resources and to chase
the money trail back to those who finance and fuel
various conflicts in various parts of Africa. Secondly,
we would suggest that, since the security, political,
economic and social dimensions of conflicts are
interlinked, it is crucial for the United Nations to
enhance coordination and complementarity in the work
of its three principal organs in order to create durable
solutions.
A way to do this could be to build on the existing
cooperation between the Security Council and the
Economic and Social Council and to establish ad hoc
composite committees, with membership drawn from
the Security Council, the General Assembly and the
Economic and Social Council. Such composite
committees could generate a coherent and mutually
supportive response to the internecine conflicts and
complex crises in Africa and, perhaps, elsewhere. Such
composite committees could look at complex
emergencies from different perspectives and thus
generate coherent solutions. This approach would also
reduce the burden on the Security Council, which is
increasingly finding itself preoccupied with internal
political, economic and development issues in various
conflict situations. The involvement of the larger
number of States Members of the United Nations in the
composite committees would also promote greater
participation and greater transparency in the work
involved in the prevention of conflicts, the
management of conflicts and the solution of conflicts.
In this context, the role of the Council would remain
that of an executive branch in promoting the
implementation of comprehensive, coherent and
proactive approaches. This could also prove to be an
effective complement for the realization of the
objectives of the New Partnership for Africa's
Development.
I now resume my functions as President of the
Council.
I request Mr. Gambari, if he has any additional
comments, to take the floor.
Mr. Gambari: On behalf of the Secretariat, I
would like to thank you, Sir, for your initiative of
organizing this meeting and all the members of the
Council, as well as the delegations that took the floor
to speak on this important and timely topic, "Conflicts
in Africa: Security Council missions and United
Nations mechanisms to promote peace and security". In
particular, my new Office, which has responsibility for
preparing reports to the General Assembly and the
Economic and Social Council on critical issues
affecting Africa, especially the nexus between peace
and development, is grateful for those interventions.
All of us in the Secretariat will reflect on the views and
the proposals made today and will continue to offer our
support for Security Council missions to Africa and
other United Nations system-wide mechanisms to
promote peace and security, especially in Africa.
The recommendations made today relating to the
forthcoming missions to Central and West Africa can
only strengthen the terms of reference for the missions
and enhance a successful outcome. I hope that those
suggestions will be taken on board. In my view,
Security Council missions to Africa are not goals in
themselves. Of course, the missions demonstrate
solidarity with the millions of Africans in conflict
areas, in particular the millions of women and children
who suffer disproportionately from the multiplicity of
conflicts on the continent. Council missions also
represent valuable further education for those who
participate and for Council members who receive their
reports upon their return to Headquarters.
Beyond all that, however, it is essential that
missions add real value to existing concrete efforts in
support of conflict prevention and resolution in Africa.
In that regard, missions and the Security Council as a
whole will need to avoid situations where expectations
for peace and development in Africa are raised, only to
be subsequently disappointed. It is true, of course, that
a primary responsibility for resolving conflict in Africa
lies with Africans themselves. However, there is
growing evidence in Cote d'lvoire, Burundi and
elsewhere that Africans are serious in their
commitment to peace and security in their respective
subregions and in the region as a whole. Therefore, the
international community, led by the United Nations and
spearheaded by the Security Council, has a
responsibility under the Charter to support those
efforts.
Finally, our discussion today has pointed to a
number of key conclusions that, I believe, must guide
future action by the Security Council and by the United
Nations system as a whole.
First, priority must be accorded to conflict
prevention and to post-conflict peace-building in
Africa. In that regard, poverty eradication, encouraging
the politics of inclusion and addressing other root
causes of conflicts must be tackled as a matter of
urgency.
Secondly, helping Africans to build capacity for
peace operations is essential. In most cases, they have
the human resources and a tradition of peacekeeping,
but not the logistics or the financial resources to mount
large-scale peacekeeping operations on the continent.
Thirdly, the regional dimensions of conflicts in
Africa must be taken fully into account in United
Nations efforts to resolve conflicts there.
Fourthly, working with the African Union and
subregional organizations is a necessity, not a
privilege, in our efforts to prevent and resolve African
conflict.
Fifthly, it is essential to establish reliable and
sustained lines of communication with key actors and
parties to conflicts on the ground in Africa, and with
those outside Africa who have influence on those
parties, so that the Security Council's resolutions and
presidential statements are transmitted, received and
accepted by the parties on the ground. As we all know,
it is one thing to adopt resolutions and to issue
presidential statements here in New York and quite
another for those statements and resolutions to be
understood and respected by the parties to conflicts on
the ground in Africa.
Finally, periodic joint meetings between the
Security Council and the Economic and Social Council,
and even joint missions of both organs to conflict areas
in Africa, may be considered as useful tools, especially
for realizing the peace-building objectives that we all
share. Above all - as you said only a few minutes ago,
Mr. President - Council discussions on African
conflicts and Council missions to Africa need to be
followed by concrete actions, driven by the political
will to commit the necessary resources to conflict
prevention, management and resolution and to post-
conflict peace-building efforts in Africa.
The President: I thank Mr. Gambari, Under-
Secretary-General and Special Adviser on Africa, for
those remarks.
There are no further speakers inscribed on my
list. The presidency, on its own responsibility, will
summarize important and new suggestions presented
during this debate and will circulate them shortly.
This is the last formal meeting of the Pakistan
presidency of the Security Council. Pakistan inherited
the presidency in good shape from Mexico. We are
concluding our presidency with a sense of deep
satisfaction. During this month, building on previous
efforts, we saw the Council regain its unity of purpose
and move forward in a constructive spirit.
I should like to take this opportunity to express
our gratitude and appreciation to all members of the
Security Council, who have extended unfailing
cooperation to the Pakistani presidency and have
enabled us to discharge our responsibilities this month.
I should also like to express my delegation's deepest
appreciation to the Security Council secretariat for its
invaluable and unstinting support. We are also grateful
to the support staff of translators, interpreters and
security personnel for their characteristic hard work
and good humour during the entire month. I wish to
conclude by wishing every success to my successor,
Ambassador Lavrov of the Russian Federation, into
whose expert and experienced hands the Council
presidency will pass next month.
The meeting rose at 6.05 pm.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.4766Resumption1.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-4766Resumption1/. Accessed .