← Votes

66/7 GA

66
Session
Draft symbol A/66/L.6
Adopted symbol 66/7
UN Document 66/7 ↗

Vote ConsensusA/66/PV.48 Nov. 2, 2011

Speeches following this vote (9) may include explanations of vote
The Acting President
I shall now call on those representatives who wish to speak in exercise of the right of reply. May I remind members that statements in exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to five minutes for the second intervention and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Ri Tong Il (Democratic People's Republic of Korea)
Thank you, Madam President, for giving me the floor once again. The delegation of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea categorically rejects the remarks made by the representatives of Japan and South Korea, because they have no fundamental reality or truth as concerns the Korean peninsula, as I said earlier. I should like to draw the attention of the representatives participating in this m…
Mr. Rim Kap-soo (Republic of Korea)
I would like to exercise the Republic of Korea’s right of reply in response to the North Korean delegation’s claims, which clearly run counter to facts that have been recognized and supported by the international community. Let me briefly chronicle what has happened since the year 1993. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea announced unilateral withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Prolifera…
Mr. Kodama (Japan)
I would like to exercise the right of reply to the allegations against Japan made by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea at this meeting. Let me set the record straight on the following three points. First of all, the Japanese Government’s adherence to the three non-nuclear principles, namely that possessing, manufacturing or permitting the introduction of nuclear wea…
The Acting President
I remind members that statements made in exercise of right of reply are limited to five minutes for the second intervention.
Mr. Ri Tong Il (Democratic People's Republic of Korea)
Concerning the remarks by the representatives of the Republic of Korea and Japan, these representatives again made remarks that do not convey the fundamental realities on the Korean peninsula and in the vicinity, specifically in Japan. The representative of South Korea tells a different story by not referring to the nuclear umbrella that it has been using for over six decades, the world’s largest…
Mr. Rim Kap-soo (Republic of Korea)
Regarding the claims made by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, I will be very brief. First, Seoul is just 55 miles away from the border and has a population of 12 million people. Along the border there are 1 million North Korean troops. They have made a great many provocations, as I indicated earlier. Without going into detail, there are over 24 cases. So we are con…
Mr. Kodama (Japan)
I will be very brief. Whatever allegations the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea made in his second exercise of the right of reply, my delegation would like very much to remind the international community that it was the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea that continued developing its nuclear and missile programmes, including its uranium enrichment programme, in viola…
The Acting President
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 86? It was so decided.
Cite this page

UN Project. “66/7.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/66-7/. Accessed .