69/11 GA
Cooperation between the United Nations and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
69
Session
| Draft symbol | A/69/L.12 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | 69/11 |
| UN Document | 69/11 ↗ |
Vote Consensus — A/69/PV.48
Speeches following this vote (18)
The President
Draft resolution A/69/L.13 is entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Collective Security Treaty Organization”. May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/69/L.13?
The President
Draft resolution A/69/L.14 is entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Black Sea Economic Cooperation Organization”.
I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.
Mr. Botnaru
I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to those delegations listed on the document, the following countries have become sponsors of draft
resolution A/69/L.14: Germany, Hungary, Montenegro and Spain.
The President
May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/69/L.14?
The President
We now turn to draft resolution A/69/L.16, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons”.
I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.
Mr. Botnaru
I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to those delegations listed on the document, the following countries have become sponsors of draft resolution A/69/L.16: Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hun…
The President
A recorded vote has been requested on paragraph 2 of draft resolution A/69/L.16 and on draft resolution A/69/L.16 as a whole. I shall first put to the vote paragraph 2 of draft resolution A/69/L.16.
The President
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/69/L.16 as a whole, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons”. A recorded vote has been requested. [Subsequently, the delegations of Cambodia, Guyana, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, and the Philippines informed the Secretariat that they had intended to vote in fa…
The President
Before giving the floor to the speakers in explanation of vote on the resolutions just adopted, I would like to remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mrs. Jakubonė
Lithuania would like to make a statement in explanation of its position after the adoption of resolution 69/12 on cooperation between the United Nations and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
Time and again, we have seen the important role that regional organizations can play in promoting conflict resolution, peace negotiations and mediation, and other matters of international p…
Mr. Ceylan
Turkey is committed to the ultimate goal of the total elimination of all weapons of mass destruction. It fulfils its commitments under the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction as the sole international legally binding instrument that bans an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. Turkey pursues effe…
Mr. Agasandyan
We are grateful to the delegation of the Netherlands for the preparation of resolution 69/14, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons”.
Based on the spirit of cooperation and constructive interaction, we supported the consensus adoption of the document. However, we would like to emphasize that such general and technical resolu…
Ms. Xiao Yue
The Chinese delegation voted in favour of resolution 69/14, on cooperation between the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). China appreciates the effective cooperation between the United Nations and the OPCW. At the same time, we believe that the OPCW should have played a
leading role in the destruction of chemical weapons in Syria.
The President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the voting.
I now give the floor to the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic, who wishes to speak in exercise of the right of reply. May I remind members that statements in exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to five minutes for the second intervention and should be made by deleg…
Mr. Ibrahim
Apparently the representative of Turkey and of the Turkish regime is quite used to violating the general procedures of the General Assembly. As a sponsor of resolution 69/14, he should not be allowed to speak in explanation of vote after the voting.
Apparently he also has knowledge about locations involving the use of chemical weapons against members of the Syrian army and civilians in Syria, bu…
Mr. Botnaru
I should like to clarify for the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic that Turkey was not a sponsor of resolution 69/14.
The President
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of sub-items (d), (f), (g), (o), (q), (w) and (y) of agenda item 123?
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “69/11.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/69-11/. Accessed .