75/324 GA
Cooperation between the United Nations and the Economic Cooperation Organization
75
Session
| Draft symbol | A/75/L.131 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | 75/324 |
| UN Document | 75/324 ↗ |
Vote Consensus — A/75/PV.102
Speeches following this vote (14)
The Acting President
Before giving the floor to speakers in explanation of position after adoption, I would like to remind delegations that explanations are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mrs. Ponikvar Velázquez
I have the honour to deliver this explanation of position on behalf of the European Union (EU) and its member States.
The European Union and its member States will continue to support resolution 75/324, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Economic Cooperation Organization”, and to encourage further cooperation between the two organizations, in line with the provisions of the…
Mr. Fogarty
We thank Turkmenistan for its work in facilitating resolution 75/324, on the Economic Cooperation Organization.
The United States notes that this resolution is a technical rollover and does not take into account any recent developments or circumstances in particular Member States. The United States therefore does not consider that the historical previously agreed language in operative paragraphs…
Mr. Knyazyan
I am taking the floor to explain Armenia’s position on resolution 75/324, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Economic Cooperation Organization”.
Operative paragraph 3 of the resolution refers to a document adopted in 2012 that contains formulations blatantly distorting the essence and principles of the resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The formulations in the Bak…
Mr. Cosentino
Argentina is pleased to join the consensus on resolution 75/324, based on its support for strengthening international cooperation between the United Nations and regional organizations. In that regard, Argentina is in favour of harnessing the resources and advantages of regional organizations in order to address specific situations in their respective geographic areas. In the case of the Economic …
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of position after adoption.
The exercise of the right of reply has been requested. I would like to remind members that statements in the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and five minutes for the second, and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mrs. Kocyigit Grba
Before I reply to an issue raised in the explanation made by the representative of Slovenia on behalf of the European Union (EU), I would first like to welcome the adoption of resolution 75/324, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Economic Cooperation Organization”. As a founding member of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), Turkey attaches great importance to it as …
Mr. Musayev
Our delegation has requested the floor in exercise of our right of reply in connection with the statement made by the representative of Armenia in his explanation of position on resolution 75/324, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Economic Cooperation Organization”.
Armenia’s long-standing record of confrontation regarding the united position of the international community…
Mr. Ghadirkhomi
Today I am taking the floor to exercise my right of reply with regard to the statement by the representative of Argentina, which left my delegation with no choice but to briefly touch on his nonsensical comment regarding the status of the Secretary General of the Economic Cooperation Organization. We deeply regret the fact that this forum has been used as an opportunity to make reference to such …
Mr. Chrysostomou
I am taking the floor to exercise my country’s right of reply to the statement made by the representative of Turkey.
First, with regard to the way the representative of Turkey referred to my country, let me stress that it is imperative that we all respect one another and address each State Member of the United Nations using its correct name.
Secondly, the Turkish statement today demonstrates on…
Mr. Knyazyan
I am taking the floor in exercise of our right to reply to the delegation of Azerbaijan.
There was no reference in our statement to Azerbaijan. However, we take note that the delegation of Azerbaijan recognized itself as the country abusing the platform of the Economic Cooperation Organization for propagating its distorted conflict narratives. We resolutely refute the allegations and the usual d…
Mr. Musayev
In numerous communications circulated as documents of the General Assembly and the Security Council, our delegation has comprehensively addressed similar allegations from Armenia. I see no need to repeat them today, but I would like to briefly point out the following.
What the representative of Armenia called a pre-planned military aggression was the exercise by Azerbaijan of its inherent right …
Mr. Knyazyan
I feel compelled to react to certain points just made by the delegation of Azerbaijan. The representative of Azerbaijan’s attempts to whitewash his country’s aggressive policies and responsibility for the large-scale war unleashed against the people of Nagorno Karabakh are futile for one very simple reason — the leader of Azerbaijan has himself recognized that Azerbaijan was responsible for start…
The Acting President
May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to conclude its consideration of sub-item (i) of agenda item 130?
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “75/324.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/75-324/. Accessed .