S/PV.1655 Security Council

We will now continue consideration of the item on the agenda. I would draw the Council’s attention to document S/10747, which contains a draft resolution sponsored by the delegations of Guinea, Somalia and the Sudan.

I am speaking to introduce, on behalf of the delegations of Guinea, Somalia and the Sudan, the draft resolution contained in document S/10747, which pertains to the special report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968) 3. The draft resolution is a genuine attempt by the sponsors to rally all the members of the Security Council to accept unanimously the recommendations and suggestions contained in part III of the special report. The main idea behind it is too simple and too modest to be contested. It seeks only to tidy up this Committee and to provide it in a modest way with the possibility of being informed on matters of evasion of sanctions and with a possible 7. Finally, operative paragraph 10 requests the Secretary- General to provide all appropriate assistance to the Security -- 1 See Rhodesia: Report of the Commission on Rhodesian Opinion under the Chairmanship of the R&ht Honourable the Lord Pearce (London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1972) Cmnd. 4964. 8. in conclusion, I wish to appeal to all members of the Council to vote unanimously in favour of the draft resolution contained in document S/10747, dated 28 July 1972. 9. I should like to confine myself to this brief introduction of the draft resolution which is before the Council, limited in scope and non-polemical as it is.

Mr. President, disagreeable or uncomfortable though it may be to come back from holiday, it does give me great pleasure, at any rate, that I arrive back in time to be able to sit. under your wise presidency of this Council for the last two series of meetings that we shall have this month. It gives me the greatest pleasure to be able to come and do this and to welcome you in your capacity as President. 11. As others have already pointed out, it has been agreed to restrict this debate to the examination of the specia1 report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968), contained in document S/10632. The representative of the Sudan, to whom, I must add, we are all grateful for his untiring efforts as Chairman of the Committee, has set the example in this respect and, of course, I shall likewise confine my own remarks to this subject. 12. The purpose of the draft resolution before us is to approve the recommendations and suggestions contained in part III of the special report and to call upon all concerned to take the necessary action. Because of the timing and to some extent the manner of the presentation of various parts of the special report my delegation was obliged at the time to make a blanket reservation on the whole of it. That did not, of course, alter the fact that the objective of making the Committee an effective instrument for the application of mandatory sanctions is one that we have always put high on our list of priorities. Indeed, many of the reservations we have expressed about certain proposals connected with the Committee’s work-for example, the proposal that its terms of reference should be further extended-were precisely because we feared that those proposals would hamper rather than increase the Committee’s effectiveness. 13. Of the proposals that I’igure in part III of the present report several originated in suggestions which my delegation has made or been associated with in the past. Some of them indeed are repetitions of decisions previously taken, and we would have hoped that the Committee could already have proceeded with them on its own authority. However that may be, we are glad now to join with other members of the Council in endorsing these recommendations. 15. As for the question of the evasion of sanctions the views of my Government on this were set out by my Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons, and I should like to repeat them now. He said: “In the successive annual reports of the United Natiom sanctions supervisory Committee-the Committee e&b. lished in pursuance of Security Council resolutioa 253 (1968)-various countries have been mentioned in cases of suspected sanctions violations involving the’u nationals. For the most part the countries mentionedare those named in the approximately 170 notes which we have submitted to the United Nations sanctions Commit. tee, not by way of accusation but so as to enable the Governments of the countries concerned to investigate whether a breach of sanctions has occurred. A list of the countries so named would be misleading. Our notes are no proof of an offence and in certain cases the reference to an individual country was purely incidental, For instance when a ship with suspect cargo called at a number of ports in different, countries. “The evidence for widespread sanctions evasions by other countries is in fact general rather than particular. It is of four main types. “There is firstly and most importantly the calculation made by the United Nations sanctions Committee by reference to recorded trade statistics that at least one. third and possibly as much as half of Rhodesia’s exports are reaching United Nations member countries which claim to be observing sanctions. “Secondly, there are the Rhodesians’ ‘own published export figures. After a drop of 40 per cent in domestic exports by 1968 in comparison with 1965 as the relevant Security Council resolutions began to take effect, there was a steady increase until 1971 when the corresponding figure was only 2.5 per cent below that of 1965. “Thirdly, there are the 170 specific cases of suspected evasions which we have reported to the United Nations sanctions Committee. It is inconceivable that all of those transactions were innocent, yet in no case that I know of has a prosecution resulted. “Lastly, theI;e is the inference to be drawn by the Rhodesians’ apparent ability to import up to a level limited only by the availability of foreign exchange, Visitors to Rhodesia h&e commented ofi the extent to which traditional British exports have been replaced bY supplies from other countries. “Granted that an export to an innocent destination may eventually end up in Rhodesia without the exFcr- 16, That is what my Foreign Secretary said, and as the quotation from his statement which I have just read makes clear, the question of responsibility of Governments is a very delicate one. My Government would not wish in these circumstances to single out any particular Government for blame. The present draft resolution rightly does not do this. It is nevertheless essential that pressure should be maintained on the Rhodesian regime. This draft resolution sets out again clearly the responsibilities of Governments and of the United Nations to this end. It also makes certain practical suggestions to both for the ways in which these responsibilities may be carried out. My delegation will therefore be glad to vote in favour of the draft resolution. 24. Secondly, recently the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its ninth session held in June 1972 at Rabat adopted a series of important resolutions. At a time when the Security Council is discussing the question of Southern Rhodesia, special mention should be made of the Conference’s resolution on Zimbabwe. This resolution reflected the firm determination of the Zimbabwe people to unite as one and fight against imperialism, colonialism and neo-colonialism and for national independence. It also expressed the African countries’ strong position for the strengthening of sanctions against the white racist regime of Southern Rhodesia. It condemned the United States Government for its continued importation of chrome ore from Zimbabwe in open contravention of Security Council resolutions 253 (1968), 277 (1970) and 314 (1972) and contrary to the obligations assumed by the United States under Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations. The Chinese delegation maintains that in accordance with the Purpases and Principles of the Charter, the Council shouId support the Zimbabwe people’s just struggle for national independence. The Council should also sternly condemn the United States for its recent continuous importation of chrome and nickel from Southern Rhodesia.

I thank the representative of the United Kingdom for the kind words he said about me.

Mr. President, may I first join in the many appropriate comments that have been made about your leadership not just here in the Council but also in the effective way in which the sometimes difficult consultations have been carried out. 19, I wish also to express our apologies to our fellow members of the CounciI for having delayed the meeting this morning, but there were last minute, intensive consultations on the draft resolution on which the Council will vote. I am sure that we contributed more than our fair share of the delay, although it was in an effort, I might say, to try to achieve compromise. 25. Thirdly, the Chinese delegation supports the fourpoint proposals submitted by the delegations of Guinea, Somalia and the Sudan in the special report of the sanctions Committee [S/.20632, puras. 25-281. Over a long period, the South African authorities and the Portuguese colonialist Government, with the support of certain major Powers, have given support to the white racist rCgime of Southern Rhodesia by various means and have done their utmost to undermine the sanctions against Sou’thern Rhodesia. In order to give more effective support to the struggle of the Zimbabwe people, the Chinese delegation holds that the Council should widen the sanctions to cover South Africa and Portugal. 20. The United States had been under the impression that the draft resolution concerning the special report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968) would be a procedural one. Regrettably, while the Council could have acted expeditiously on such a procedural draft resolution, the present draft resolution to our mind is more substantive than procedural, especially in view of the inclusion of operative paragraphs 5, 6 and 7. We are however most grateful for the courtesies shown us in the consultations and negotiations that preceded this meeting.

I thank Ambassador Bush for the words he addressed to me in his statement. 26. Having stated the above views, the Chinese delegation considers that the draft resolution submitted by Guinea, Somalia and the Sudan reflects the demand of the great majority of Member States for strengthening the sanctions. Therefore, the Chinese delegation will vote in favour of the draft resolution. 22. Mr. HUANG Hua (China) (translation from C%inesej: With regard to the question of strengthening sanctions against Southern Rhodesia I should like to make the folIowing remarks. 28. We should like to express our great satisfaction and pleasure at the return of the Secretary-General and we welcome him here to New York. 29. The Security Council has met today to consider the special report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968) on Southern Rhodesia, submitted in pursuance of its resolution 314 (1972) which was adopted on 28 February 1972. This would seem to reIate to one particular question, but in fact it reflects, as in a drop of water, the wider and more important problem of Southern Rhodesia as a whole, which is a cause of grave concern to world public opinion and to the Council. 30. The extent of the people’s concern about the situation in Southern Rhodesia is demonstrated by the recent resolution adopted on the question at the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Members of the Organization of African Unity held at Rabat in June of this year. 31. As we see it, the objective of the Security Council as far as Southern Rhodesia is concerned is the enjoyment of the inalienable right of the people of Zimbabwe to freedom and independence. Recognition of the legality of the struggle of the people of Zimbabwe for freedom and independence has. repeatedly been confirmed by the Council in its resolutions. The Council and, of course, the Committee which serves as the Council’s working arm in the search for ways and means of carrying out the task in question, should direct their efforts towards the attainment of that objective, i.e. the freedom and independence of the people of Zimbabwe, 32. One important means of exerting influence on the racist Smith regime, which has usurped the rights of the people of Zimbabwe, is the system of mandatory sanctions, Consequently, it is one of the main tasks of the Committee to increase the effectiveness of such mandatory sanctions, 33. The Committee’s special report submitted for consideration by the Council contains recommendations which permit us to take definite steps forward towards the achievement of those goals, The Soviet delegation considers that the positive significance of the Committee’s report lies in the fact that it improves the functioning of that subsidiary body of the Council. In our opinion, the fact that the chairmanship of the Committee is on a permanent basis is a step in this direction, Clear affirmation of the correctness of this procedure, consideration of which, as we all remember, occupied us for some time in March of this year, is provided by the Committee report now before us, which was drawn up under the chairmanship of the representative of an African State, the Sudan-the distinguished Ambassador Rahmatalla Abdulla. A further positive development is that this report represents a new step in the 34. Of course, all this is still far from being enough to ensure the attainment of the basic and major objective of the United Nations with regard to Southern Rhodesia, which is to eliminate the rule of the racist regime of 1an Smith over the people of Zimbabwe and to secure the enjoyment by the people of Zimbabwe of their inaliana&le right to freedom and independence. In the Committee aa Soviet delegation, together with the delegations of the African and other countries, insisted, when the draft report was being prepared, that the Security Council should be recommended to take more decisive and more effective measures. We considered, as we still do, that the Council should request all States continuing to have relations witi the Smith regime to end immediately such commercial, economic and other ties. States which are openly violating the sanctions established by the Council, and above all the United States of America, should be condemned, 35. The Soviet delegation also considers that the Security Council should, without delay, extend the application of sanctions to Portugal and South Africa, whose role in the violation of sanctions and the provision of assistance to the Smith r&irne is well known to all, The Soviet Union, together with the African and other countries, also spoke out in the Committee in favour of the adoption of recommendations to the Council to the effect that sanctions against the racist regime of Ian Smith itself should be broadened. 36, Unfortunately, these just demands of the African countries, supported by the Soviet Union and by the majority of States Members of the Council, encountered opposition on the part of the colonialist Powers. 37. The Soviet delegation considers that the Security Council must take appropriate measures to ensure that the main objective, namely, the enjoyment by the people of Zimbabwe of their inalienable right to freedom and independence, is achieved as soon as possible. 38. Despite certain shortcomings, which are due to the causes we have mentioned, the Committee’s report contains a large number of positive elements, enabling the Commit. tee to move in the right direction in its work. AS we know, the report t was approved by the Organization of African Unity at its meeting at Rabat. In view of all this, the Soviet delegation will vote in favour of the draft resolution submitted by the delegations of Guinea, Somalia and the Sudan, which recommends that the report should he approved. 39. At the same time, the Soviet delegation considers the approval of the recommendations contained in the Committee’s report to be only the first step, one which must he followed by intensive work by the Committee itself and by substantive consideration in the Security Council Of other, broader problems connected with the serious and dangerous situation in Southern Rhodesia and of measures Which the Council could adopt in this respect. 42. Although some results have been achieved, we recog. nize that the system which was set up continues to be imperfect. As a member since 1968 of the Committee called upon to verify implementation, we could see the insufficiencies of the system. Thus last February, we supported the initiative to increase the effectiveness of the Committee by inviting the Committee to prepare a report containing recommendations to this effect. That document is now before us, as is also a draft resolution. I would like to make certain comments in this connexion.

My delegation is a sponsor of the draft resolution currently before the Council. In formulating this draft resolution the sponsors endeavoured to take into account the views of all delegations and it comes as a matter of great disappointment to my delegation to find that exception has been expressed by the delegation of the United States to operative paragraphs .5,6 and 7. It is true that the principal body of proposals contained in the special report relate primarily to procedural aspects of sanctions and also to the sanctions machinery, But it is difficult to speak of machinery in complete isolation from the objective for which that machinery is to be applied, What do operative paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 state? Operative paragraph 5 reads: 43. Concerning first of all the report of the Committee, particularly part III, which was agreed to unanimously, it goes without saying that we endorse the recommendations and suggestions calling upon Member States to co-operate more actively with the Committee which will attempt to define a more active policy in regard to seeking information and which would improve the working methods of the Committee. All these proposals would lead to greater effectiveness of the sanctions regime, an objective which we fully support. 44, With regard to the draft resolution which is now before us, we observe that this text demonstrates the effort of the sponsors to obtain support from the largest possible number of members of the Security Council for the recommendations of the Committee. However, along with those in part III of the report, which are generally supported, we now have some proposals which, when examined by the Committee gave rise to objections from my delegation concerning the competence they invest in the Committee to pass on matters which we thought were outside its competence. This particularly holds for the proposal in paragraph 25 of the report and reproduced in operative paragraphs 1’ and 2 of the draft resolution, However, my delegation, which wishes to favour the strictest application of the sanctions regime and the most effective supervision of those sanctions, will vote in favour of the draft resolution that is now submitted here, especially in view of its general nature, and in the case of operative paragraphs 1 and 2 we should not wish to stand in the way of the decision of the administering Power, which did not oppose them, Surely, this goes to the very heart of sanctions. Secondly, operative paragraph 6 reads: If one, two or three States can fmd it convenient or feel that it is their right to be an exception, then what is to prevent other States from adopting the same attitude? The whole machinery of sanctions would just collapse, Operative paragraph 7 reads: If we do not condemn, are we here to applaud or to ignore? Surely, if we come out with a decision it is a decision which all Members of the United Nations without exception are bound by Article 25 of the Charter to observe scrupulously. There can be no exceptions and we cannot ignore violations, we cannot applaud violations. The least we can do is to condemn them, 45. Mr. RIOS (Panama) (interpretation from Spanish). With regard to the draft resolution so brilliantly introduced by the representative of the Sudan, my delegation has instructions to vote in favour of it. “Calls upon all States continuing to have economic and other relations with Southern Rhodesia to end such relations immediately”. ‘Demands that all Member States should scrupulously carry out their obligations to implement fully the provisions of Security Council resolutions 253 (1968), 277 (1970) and 314 (1972)“, “Condemns all acts violating the provisions of Security Council resolutions ‘Q53 (1968), 277 (1970) and 314 (1972)“. A vote was taken by a show of hands. In favour: Argentina, Belgium, China, France, Guinea, India, Italy, Japan, Panama, Somalia, Sudan, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Yugoslavia. Against: None. Abstaining: United States of America. me draft resolution was adopted by 14 votes to none, with I abstention.2

I shall now call on those representatives who wish to explain their votes.

My delegation feels that the implementation of sanctions against Rhodesia and South Africa constitutes at the present time the only means available to the international community to put an end effectively to the cancer of racism which is virulent in that part of Africa. Thus, in order to be crowned with success, these sanctions, should be fully supported by the great Powers, by the trading partners of Rhodesia and South Africa and, of course, by international public opinion. 52. The great Powers have a special responsibility as regards the measures to be taken by the United Nations and their effective implementation. During the course of the meetings, various arguments have been adduced concerning the difficulties of applying economic sanctions, but it seems to be ignored that the efforts and sacrifices required are insignificant when compared to the dangers of inaction. The problem is not to know whether the world can undertake to impose economic sanctions, but whether the world can fail to take decisive measures, above all when the means that it must utihze to put an end to the conflicts are still possible. 53. The crisis which is brewing in southern Africa is very dangerous and entails grave consequences for the whole world. The African peoples and all peoples throughout the world who love peace, liberty and social justice have waited too long while certain great Powers continue to evidence a lack of decision as to the decisive measures that should be taken. Not to wish to recognize this betrays the African peoples. My delegation is convinced that the new measures eiaborated by the Committee on sanctions will receive all the necessary support from all Member States of this international Organization and from the trading partners of Rhodesia and South Africa as well, and that is why my delegation sponsored the draft resolution which has just been adopted, 2 See resolution 318 (1972). 55. It is the understanding of my delegation, first, that tic draft resolution was prepared on the -basis of the special report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968) and, secondly, t.hat its main objectives are to approve the recommendations and suggestions contained in part III of the special report with a view to ensuring the effectiveness of the work of the Committee, and to call upon all States to co-operate fully with the Council in the effective implementation of sanctions. 56. With this understanding, my delegation voted in favour of the draft resolution. 57. I wish to take this opportunity to reiterate the basic position of the Government of Japan towards the sanctions against Southern Rhodesia. 58. As soon as possible after the Security Council had decided upon the imposition of sanctions against Southern Rhodesia, the Government of Japan adopted a whole series of measures in order to implement the provisions of the pertinent Council resolutions. As we have previousIy stated on a number of occasions, we have been fully and faithfully applying these measures and will continue to do so.

The Security Council has addressed its attention today to a specific aspect of the complex question of Southern Rhodesia, namely, the strengthening of the machinery for the full implementation of sanctions. We have examined the special report of the Committee established in pursuance of Security CowneIl resolution 253 (1968), so lucidly introduced and explained by the Chairman of the Committee, Ambassador Abdulla of the Sudan and we have adopted a resolution which approves the recommendations and suggestions contained in part III of that report. 60. My delegation has cast its vote in favour of the resolution consistently with the position of my country on the question of sanctions, a position which I shall briefly recall in explanation of my vote. 61. Italy has never recognized the rebel white regime in Southern Rhodesia and it has extended whole-heartedly its support to all the measures adopted by this Organization with a view to bringing the rebellion to an end. In particular, when the United Kingdom-which in its capacity as the administering Power has the primary responsibility for the destiny of that Territory-asked the United Nations to adopt mandatory sanctions against the regime in Salisbury, Italy fully supported both the United Kingdom and the United Nations. The Italian Government imPkmented resolution 253 (1968) and subsequent relevant resolutions by adopting and promulgating special legislation which contemplates criminal prosecution and punishnlenr for violators of the sanctions. My delegation has given unreserved co-operation to the Committee established in 63. In 1970 the Committee on sanctions developed a set of principles and rules to enhance its effectiveness. I refer to document S/9844/Rev.l.a This year the same Committee has confirmed, and to a certain extent has completed and enlarged, this set of principles and rules, as is shown by the special report before us. We hope that this important preparatory work will enable the Committee to deal more rapidly and effectively with any concrete case of suspected violations. 69. At present the effectiveness of sanctions, since there have been overt and covert evasions, calls for the utmost co-operation of all States, as well as the strengthening of the Committee established in pursuance of Security Council resolution 253 (1968). Only then can we bring pressure to bear on the illegal minority regime and on the comforts and the privileges which the white minority insist on enjoying at the expense of 95 per cent of the African people. The stringent application of sanctions is very important in that respect. This is more or less the sort of policy and convictions we have. 64. The implementation of sanctions established by resolutions 253 (1968) and 277 (1970) in the view of my delegation, constitutes a clear obligation under the Charter for all member States, and the non-fulfdment by any State inevitably affects and may impair the efforts made by other States, at least in so far as doubts are cast on the mandatory nature of the sanctions themselves. 70. If I may be permitted to do so, I should like to thank all the delegations which supported our fair, mild and delicate draft resolution. I should also like to mention something I became aware of during my presence in one Committee, and that is the excellent efforts made by the United Kingdom in providing us with a lot of information regarding possible evasions. 65. It is for this reason that my delegation feels it expedient once more to stress the necessity that all Members co-operate towards implementing the sanctions, in the first instance by adopting, as my country did, appropriate and effective legislation. 71. We are also happy to note that, after being in suspense concerning what the United Kingdom delegation would do during the discussion of the draft resolution, we were pleasantly surprised to have our reservations removed and to find that the United Kingdom is attempting to continue sanctions and also strongly recommends them. Of course, this is not to say that we are in favour of the whole British policy up to now towards the whole Rhodesian question. But for us that is a question of tomorrow, not of today.

I have to apologize for being obliged to speak more than once, but the Council is aware that I have been speaking in different capacities. This time I shall speak as the representative of the Sudan, and I shall be brief. I merely want to take this opportunity to highlight certain aspects of the policy of my country and its outlook towards the question of Southern Rhodesia and, in particular, the question of sanctions. 72. In the meantime, I wish to mention something more, and that is in connexion with a visit I paid to the Commonwealth Sanctions Committee on my way here from Geneva. I must say that I found them very enthusiastic in trying to implement sanctions within their OWII community. In fact, they have various proposals which they very much hope the Security Council will follow-in particular, the question of trade statistics, which they feel would provide a very effective way of knowing how commerce and trade with Southern Rhodesia is going on. At the same time they feel that the Council should really find ways and means of actually having goods inspected and that there should be machinery for that. Those are the sort of ideas I heard which were very encouraging and which I wanted to take this opportunity to place before the Council. 67. To us, sanctions against Southern Rhodesia are only one facet of the whole Rhodesian crisis which has been created by the unilateral declaration of independence by Ian Smith and his repressive group in Southern Rhodesia. We feel that sanctions are only important in so far as they relate to the whole crisis of Southern Rhodesia. Therefore, our policy is to support very strong sanctions because we feel that this is a means of contributing to the removal Of the obstacle which stands in the way of the Zimbabwe people achieving their inalienable right to independence through majority rule. We fully support, and we continue 75. We therefore look forward to September and to the denouncing of the policy of UDI, but we are filled with hope that the suspected and overt evasions will by then have ended. 76. The PRESIDENT linterpretation from Spanish]: If no other member wishes to speak and with the Council’s permission, I shall now speak as representative of ARGEN- TINA and explain our vote. 77. My delegation voted in favour of the draft resolution which has become resolution 318 (1972) in the hope that the recommendations and suggestions contained in part III of the special report of the Committee created under resolution 253 (1968), relating to Southern Rhodesia, which we have just adopted, will serve to give greater effectiveness to the sanctions imposed by the Council against the Ian Smith regime. 79. Under the expert and active chairmanship oI dn& sador Abdulla of the Sudan, the Committee drew special report which served as the basis for re 3 18 (1972). The road to be followed now is to im immediately and with great determination the recommV dations and suggestions which form part of the rese!uti~~ we have adopted. My delegation will continue in this e@!czt7 fully convinced that the fulfilment of the C-I emanating from the decisions of this Council co vital part of the whole United Nations system. 80. In conclusion, I should like to repeat that Arge%zati will continue constantly to supervise the implementrI~0~ :P the measures of the Council, which should contin force until we achieve the objectives laid down in rc 253 (1968). 81. Speaking now in my capacity as PRESIDEKT. I JXZ advising the Council that since there are no ~~&LFF speakers, it has concluded its consideration of the ircm x today’s agenda. The meeting rose at 5.05 p.m. HOW TO OBTAIN UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS United Nations publications may be obtained from bookstores and distributors throughout the world. Consult your bookstore or write to: United Nations, Sales Section, New York or Geneva. COMMENT SE PROCURER LES PUBLICATIONS DES NATIONS UNIES Les publications des Nations Unies sont on vente dans les librairies et les agences depositaires du monde entier. Informez-vous aupr&s de votre libraire ou adressez-vous B : Nations Unies, Section des ventes, New York ou Geneve. ICAK JIOJIY’fWl% I13AAHMR OITAHR 3A4UI.i OBTbEAHHEHHhIX HAIJEILT I?s~a~m OpRUImaq~~ 06ze~UHeHHblx Haquh MOXHO Kyna~b s KHUKH~IX Marasa~rax a arenrcrsax so scex patiosax pupa. HanonuTe cnpanlcrr 00 UBR&HWRX a DanreM XHNXHOM Maraaawe UJIN nm.nnTe no aapecy: Oprarrasaqmr O~-I,B~UWHH~IX HaquZi, Ce~qm no npoaame mAam& HLM-Woprt wna %Kerresa. COMO CONSEGUIR PUBLICACIONES DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS Las publicaciones de las Naciones Unidas estin en venta en librerfas y casas distribuidoras en todas partes de1 mundo. Consulte a su librero o dirijase a: Naciones Unidas, Secci6n de Ventas, Nueva York o Ginebra. Litho in United Nations, New York Price: $U.S. 1.00 (or equivalent in other currencies) 72.82156-November 197S-1,925