S/PV.2805 Security Council
▶ This meeting at a glance
9
Speeches
0
Countries
0
Resolutions
Topics
Israeli–Palestinian conflict
War and military aggression
Security Council deliberations
Syrian conflict and attacks
Global economic relations
Peace processes and negotiations
I should like to inform the Council that I have received
a letter dated 14 April 1988 from the Acting Chairman of the Committee On the
Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, which reads as’
follows : :’
‘I have the honour to request that I be allowed to participate in the
Security Council’s consideration of the i tern ‘The situation’ in the. occupied I 1 . . . .
Arab territories’, in.accordance with the provisions of rule 39 of the . .
Council ‘6 provisional rules of procedure, in my capacity as Acting Chairman of
the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian
People. m
On previous occasions the Security Council has extended invitations to .c representatives of other United Nations bodies in connection with the considera.tion : of matters on its agenda. In accordance with past practice in this matter, I
propose that the Council extend an invitation under rule 39 of its provisional 1, rules of procedure to the Acting Chairman of the Committee -on the Exercise of the
Inalienable Rights of the.Palestinian- People.
There being no objection, it is so decided.
. (The President)
The Security Council will now resume its consideration of the item on its
agenda.
f should like to draw the attention of members to the following documents:
S/19710 and S/19769, letters dated 30 March and 13 April 1988 from the Chairman and
the Acting Chairman, respectively, of the Committee on the Exercise of the
Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People addressed to the Secretary-General;
_ S/19723 and S/19724, letters dated 4 April 1988 from the Permanent Representative
of Jordan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General; S/19748, letter
da ted 7 April 1988 from the Permanent Representative of Algeria to the United
Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council; S/19754, .letter dated
5 April 1988 from the Permanent Representatives of Denmark, Finland, Iceland,
Norway and Sweden to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-Genetal; and
S/19758, letter dated 12 April 1988 from the Permanent Representative of Lebanon to,
the United Nations addressed to the’ Secretary-General.
The first speaker is the representative of the Palestine Liberation
Organization, on whom I now call.
Mr. TRRZI (Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO)): At the outset,
allow me to express our great appreciation to you, Mr. President, for your
endeavours and those of the members of the Council who saw fit that the Council
should resume its deliberations on the situation in the occupied Palestinian
territories. To you, I should like to say that we have full confidence in and high
appreciation for your qualities as a seasoned diplomat and a master at conducting
negotiations and discussions. But you also represent a country with which we
maintain very close relations; your people and ours have -been through .the same I
ordeal in their struggle for liberation.
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Organisation)
I should also like to express thanks to His Excellency the President of Your
country wh.0, in his wisdom, very often and on many occasions helped in formulating
and directing some of'the positions that have been adopted.
On 30 March, the Council met to consider the situation in the occupied
territories; it was addressed by no fewer than four Ministers for Foreign Affairs .
and a number of other dignitaries.
Let me state immediately that we express our appreciation for the diligence
and efficiency displayed by the President of the Council during the month of March,
the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia. Not only did he prove to be a master
at conducting the Council's business but by the way in which he was able to get the
Council to respond to the Secretary-General's letter on the, situation in the Middle
East he showed beyond any doubt that he is alsoa very well-seasoned diplomat who
always keeps in mind the interests of the United Nations and those-of-the Movement
of Non-Aligned Countries.
At that meeting on 30 March the Chairman of the Ministerial Committee and
Minister for Foreign Affairs of Algeria, Mr. Ibrahimi, told the Council: .
"For.more than 180 days the world has been witnessing a heroic popular
uprising in occupied Palestine. .'The Palestinian people is reacting by using a
symbolic weapon, stones, but its unshakable determination and its spirit of
indomitable sacrifice have shaken the attitudes of peoples, given the total ,
denial of its rights and its exile, including on its national soil, which has
continued for 40 years.
'The scale of the Zionist repression in occupied Palestine has been
reflected in the vigorous reaction of the Council and its adoption of three
resolutions - 605 (1987); 607 (1988) and 608 (1988):' Those resolutions must
be scrupulously complied with; The boldest possible humanitarian protection
should be given the people in the occupied territories." (S/PV.2804, p. 6)
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Organization)
While the Council was deliberating the occupying Power determined to go to the
other extremf? by escalating its repressive measures against our people in the
occupied Palestinian territories - measures that prompted the Secretary-General on
12 April 1988 to issue the following statement: I
"The Secretary-General views,with grave-concern the decision by the
Israeli authorities to deport eight Palestinians to southern Lebanon
yesterday.. He is equally concerned that 12 other Palestinians have received
deportation orders. He notes that the Security Council has repeatedly
reaffirmed the applicability of.the Fourth Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949
to the'territories occupied by Israel and recalls that Security Council
resolution 607 '(1988), unanimously adopted on 5 January 198S, called on Israel
to,refrain from such action. . ,a L
I The Secretary-General is worried that measures such as'deportation and
other forms-of collective punishment, such as the recent demolition of homes
-in the village of Belta, will aggravate .the tension that'prevails' in the
area. Furthermore, as he stated i&his 22 January.repork t& the kekurity
Council (S/19443), these measures are a violation of the FourthGeneva
Convention. He appeals to Israel, as the occupying Power, to abide by
obligations under this Convention and to rescind the deportation orders, He
earnestly hopes that the Palestinians who have been deported will promptly be
allowed to return to their homes and families..
This morning, 14 April 1988, the headquarters of the United Nations Relief and
Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) issued the following
statement:
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine . . Liberation Organization)
'Since early Decenber last year, UWRWA has been expressing its concern
over the kinds of measures being used in the Westgank and the Gaza Strip.
This concern has increased with Agency medical personnel facing a continued
flow Of patients suffering from gunshot wounds, beatings and the effect of
tear gas, which is particularly injurious when used inside buildings.
"The Agency is also concerned about the long-term effects of injuries on
the refugee population and the costs for rehabilitation of severely-injured
refugees. In the Gaza Strip UWRWA has employed 16 physiotherapists with the
help of UNICEF to assist in rehabilitation work. :.
"Hundreds of refugees have been .treated in UNRWA clinics for tear gas : ~
inhalation. In some cases tear gas has been thrown inside homes, clinics and
SChOOlS where the effects are particularly severe. .Agency doctors have also
seen symptoms not normally connected with regular tear gas:and UWRWA is
seeking information on contents of gases,used in order to.provide the proper
antidote and treatment, especially for. the.most vulnerable groups such as
Pregnant women, the~very young and the elderly." ~ :
I. :
I . . j
: 1 ,'
'! </(
5 .~ .
,,' ,'
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Organization)
Thus the Council can see, and needs no further proof, that fsrael.is using a '
gas other than the usual tear-gas - something apparently more lethal.
Reports from the occupied Palestinian territories clearly indicate that the
occupation troops had been ordered to be tough and firm and to enter villages to
break up protests, This policy of entering, even violating, villages is an
escalated form of the brutal repressive measures taken to break the will and
resolve of our people. The Jerusalem Post, an Israeli English-language daily,
reports:
"In one of the worst incidents at the weekend" - 1 April - "troops on
patrol in Gaza city shot dead three persons who attacked them with a kitchen
knife, a meat cleaver and an iron bar. The soldiers were [attacked] when they
tried to arrest persons preparing to throw stones."
The Israeli officer in command of the Southern Command, a certain
General Yitzhak Mordechai, said:
"No one, regardless of position, title, age, social condition, is exempt
from arrest if he has shown that he intends to act against our" - that is, the
occupation - "forces. In our view" - that is, in Israel's view - "it is
preferable to arrest such a person an hour before he acts to prevent the
situation from deteriorating."
Arresting Palestinian civilians on trumped-up charges of intent, I would
venture to declare here, means that the occupying Power will have to detain all the
Palestinians - all the Palestinians - who not only intend to act against the forces
of occupation but have shown in concrete ways their determination and resolve to
struggle against all aspects of occupation.
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Organization)
War Minister Rabin, the leader of the Labour Party , one of the partners in the
Tel Aviv junta, reported on 27 March that:
"The number of Palestinians from the territories under detention is now
between 3,000 and 4,000.0
Of course, how can he tell? Because the wave of arrests is tidal, even the
Minister cannot tell. What is a difference of 33 per cent in the number of
detentions? It is of no relevance to him, as the number of detentions is
increasing by the minute.
At the end of March 1988, Israel's domestic radio service in the Hebrew
language broadcast the following statement by this General Mordechai:
"The inhabitants of the territories must bear in mind the fact that the
IDF did not use even 10 per cent of its power and full measures. . . . We will
take all measures, including the demolition of houses.R
But on the same day, Shamir, the leader of the gang in Tel Aviv, warned 'those
Palestinians
"who want to damage the fortresses we are building that they will break'their'
heads against the fortresses' waLls. . . . We say to them that in our eyes they
are like grasshoppers.a
He bragged to Ma'ariti, another Hebrew language daily:
"If Israeli Arabs do not wise up, things will get tough and there will be a
lot of suffering. I hope the Arabs will not test our strength on Land Day.
We know they have some wise people. I have no regrets. A test of Strength
between us and them would be like a test of strength between an elephant and a
flea.*
This gives the Council an idea of the racist approach in the policy adopted by
Israel, the occupying Power, against our people. But here for a moment let US pause
(Mr. Tersi, Palestine Liberation Organiza tion)
to ponder: are these policies and practices really meant to confront the heroic
uprising of our people, or are such policies and practices a constant in the design
to force our people out of their homes and guarantee.a design of demography whereby
Palestinian Arabs must be dehumanized to a biblical pestilence - grasshoppers - or
be to tally elimina ted? l;et us recall that the Council, on 19 December 1980, was
alerted to a policy divulged in the Knesset , the legislative body in Israel. The
government of Israel had issued orders to be followed by its troops when they went
out into the streets. One of those orders from the military Government to the
Israeli army conscripts one the West Rank was quoted in the Rnesset:
“Anyone you catch outside,’ you first beat with clubs all over his body,
except ‘the head.' Have no mercy, break all his bones, give no explanations-
* First of all, beat, and when you are finished, you can explain why you have
.done so. If you catch a small child, order his whole family out. Make them
stand in a row and beat the father in front of his children.' Do not read ,this
beating as a privilege; it is a duty. They understand no other way. There is
no point in arresting those who just wander around outside. Seat them and
send them home. Rut if someone causes trouble, throws stones, or somethingr
first break his bones and then put him on the vehicle that will take him to
military headquarters. Rut remember, that is the order: from the minute he
is on the vehicle he is an arrested man and must not be beaten anymore.”
That is the end of the orders given by the Israeli army chief to his
conscripts on the streets, and the Council was alerted. to this way back on
19'December 1980. -I It is on record. Rut the question remains: what effect did
this revelation have? None - on the contrary, only a further determination by the
occupying Power to crush the “grasshoppers” , according to Shamir and Rabin,
partners in the Tel Aviv junta.
(Mr. Ter ei, Palestine (Mr. Ter ei, Palestine Liberation. OrganiZatiOn) Liberation. Organization)
While we are recalling things - While we are recalling things - and it is wise to recall positions and and it is wise to recall positions and
,’ ,’ b3tementS unanimously approved by the Council - on, 11 November 1976 _- and to some tatements unanimously approved by the Council - on. 11 November 1976 _- and to some
L November means a lot L November means a lot - the then President of the Council stated that the Council - the then President of the Council stated that .the Council
sd agreed unanimusly on the following: sd agreed unanimusly on the following:
“(1) To exp “(1) To exp ress ress its grave anxiety and concern Over the present serious its grave anxiety and concern Over the present serious
situation in the occupied Arab territories asa result of continued Israeli situation in the occupied Arab territories asa result of continued Israeli : :
occupation;m occupation;m . . ne Council should bear in mind that this was in 1976, ne Council should bear in mind that this was in 1976.
“( 2) Reaffirmation of its call upon the Gwernment of Israel to ensure “( 2) Reaffirmation of its call upon the Gwernment of Israel to ensure
the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants of the territories and to the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants of the territories and to
facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the
outbreak of hostilities.; outbreak of hostilities.;
: : . .
.’ .’
(Mr. Ter zi, Palestine Liberation Organiza tion)
“(3) Its reaffirmation that the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the
Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of Warm is applicable to the Arab
territories occupied by Israel since. 1967. There fore, the occupying Power is
called upon once again to comply strictly with the provisions of that
Convention and to refrain from any measure that violates them. In this
regard, the measures taken by Israel in the occupied Arab territories that
alter their demographic composition or geographical nature and particularly
the establishment of settlements are accordingly strongly deplored. Such
measures which, have no legal validity and cannot prejudice the outcome of the
search for the establishment of peace constitute an obstacle to peace;
“( 4) It considers once more that all legislative and administrative
measures and actions taken by Israel, including expropriation of land and
propertiqs thereon and the transfer of populations which tend to change the
legal stat& of -Jerusal&m,- are invalid.and cannot change that status, and
urgently to call upon Israel once more to rescind all such measures already
taken and to desist forthwith from taking any further action which tends to
change the status of Jerusalem. In this connection, the Council deplores the
failure of Israel to show any regard for Security Council resolutions
237 (1967) of 14. June 1967, 252 (1968) of 21 May 1968 and 298 (1971) Of
25 September 1971 and General Assembly resolutions 2253 (S-V) and 2254 (ES-V)
of 4 and 14 July 1967.
O(5) Its recognition that any act of profanation of the Holy Places,
religious buildings and sites or any encouragement of, or connivance at, anY
such act may endanger international peace and security.”
(Mr: Terzi , Palestine Liberation Organization)
That was said in November 1976. We are now in 1988 and, for all appearances,
the same would still apply but with much harder and stronger language.
There is something that puzzles me. There is an important document in deep
freeze in the archives of the Council, that is, document S/14268 dated
25 November 1980. That is the report of the Security Council Commission
established under resolution 446 (1979). To us, it is still a mystery why the
report was never considered in the open, here in the Council. We believe that, had
that document been considered, it would have been possible, or rather probable,
that the Council would have taken adequate measures to prevent the current
onslaught. & refresh the memory of the Council, I shall-cite a few paragraphs
from that report. They read as follows:
“228. Concern about demographic changes resulting from the settlement
policy have been repeatedly expressed to the Commission, as reflected
extensively in the Commission's previous reports. i / / "229. In the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip, where the Arab population 1 is Still considerable, the policy of harassment is generally construed as an I
endeavour to force'the Arab inhabitants to leave their lands, which could /
thereafter be settled by Israelis. . . . 1 / , “232. The Commission considers that the time has come to explora the
possibility of having a United Nations presence.establishe-d in -the area as a
first step to ensure normalization of the situation and to create a congenial
atmosphere for negotiations by the parties under United Nations auspices on
the basis .of relevant Security Council resolutions. In that framework,
consideration should be given to the return of the refugees and other persons
forced to leave their homes."
(Mr. Ter zi, Palestine Liberation Organiza tion)
Members can see that the idea of having a United Nations presence is not
something new. It has been proposed several times in this Counckl. The mystery is
why it has not been considered in the open in the Council and why it has not been
acted upon.
However, that special Commission of the Security Council noted in its
conclusions the deep anxiety about what was unanimously considered as a continuous
process of the deterioration of the situation in the occupied Arab territories,
including Jerusalem,. which is marked by heightened tensions and increased conflict
and could lead to a major conflagration. Among the conclusions is the following:
"234. . . . the Commission wo.uld like to reafirm the entirety of the
conclusions contained in its two previous reports , and more specificall’y the
following:
“(a) The Israeli Government is actively pursuing its wilful, systematic
large-scale process of establishing settlements in the occupied territories;
“(b) A correlation exists between the establishment of Israeli
settlements and ,the displacement of the Arab population;
“(cl In the implementation of its policy of settlements, Israel is
resorting to methods - often coercive and sometimes more subtle - which
include the control of. water resources, the. seizure of private property,. the
destruction of houses and the banishment of persons in complete disregard for
basic human. rights;
“(d) The settlement policy has brought drastic and adverse changes to the
economic and social pattern of the daily life of the remaining Arab population
and is causing profound changes of a geographical and demogt$phic nature in
the occupied territories, including Jerusalem; . . .
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine (Mr. Terzi, Palestine . . . . Liberation Organization) Liberation Organization)
,"236. . ..- ,"236. . ..- the Commission considers that Israel's settlement policy, With the Commission considers that Israel's settlement policy, with
the unjustified sufferings which it imposes on a defenceless population, is an the unjustified sufferings which it imposes on a defenceless population, is an
incitement to further unrest and violence; l -o incitement to further unrest and violence; . . .
“239. "239. . . . . . . Israel employs water both asan economic and even political Israel employs water both asan economic and even political
weapon to further its policy of settlements. weapon to further its policy of settlements. Consequently, the economy and Consequently, the economy and
agriculture of the Arab population is adversely affected by the exploitation. agriculture of the Arab population is adversely affected by the exploitation.
of water resources by the occupying authorities." of water resources by the occupying authorities."
The Commission made the following recommendations, among others: The Commission made the following recommendations, among others:
"243. "243. In the Commission's view, the problem of settlements and In the Commission's view, the problem of settlements and
occupation raises fundamental problems for peace. occupation raises fundamental problems for peace. The longer they continue to The longer they continue to
persist, the greater the potential for escalating the conflict; .-- persist, the greater the potential for escalating the conflict; l oo
"244. "244. . . . . . . the Commission considers that the persistent refusal of Israel the Commission considers that the persistent refusal of Israel
to heed the repeated appeals of the Security Council on the matter should be to heed the repeated appeals of the Security Council on the matter should be
censured; . . . censured; . . .
"246. "246. 'The Commission is of the view that Israel should be made aware of 'The Commission is of the view that Israel should be made aware of
. the serious deterioration of the situation in the occupied territories . the serious deterioration of the situation in the occupied territories
resulting from its policy of settlement and called upon,, as a matter of reSUlting from its policy of settlement and called upon., as a matter of
ur9encyr ur9encyr to cease the establishment, construction to cease the establishment, construction , expansion and planning Of , expansion and planning Of
settlements in those territories; . . . settlements in those territories; . . .
"249. "249. The Commission wishes to reiterate its recommendation that the The Commission wishes to reiterate its recommendation that the
Security Council adopt effective measures to prevail on Israel to cease Security Council adopt effective measures to prevail on Israel to cease
forthwith its SeJAlemi?ntS policies in all aspects in the occupied Arab forthwith its Settlements policies in all aspects in the occupied Arab
territories, territories, including Jerusalem. (S/14268) . including Jerusalem. (S/14268) .
-. -.
(Mr. Ter zi, Pales tine Liberation Organiza tion)
We do not want to lcse faith in this Council, but we do knaw. that that report
was put in a deep freeze. Perhaps one of the permanent members of the Security
Council did not like what was written in it. But then only the other day the
Secretary-General, in pursuance of resolution 605 (1987) , reported something very
similar to the Council --more grave, yes, but something’similar. Again the Council
was frustrated in its actions, thanks to a permanent member, of course- In that
report I have just mentioned, the Secretary-General stressed that the underlying
problem was Occupation, the policies and practices of the occupying Pckser and the
immediate and inevitable results of total disregard for the norms governing the
behaviour of the occupying Power, namely, the Fourth Geneva Convention. One aspect
is the prohibition to transfer civilians of the occupying Power to the territory
under occupa tion. Israel has not only permitted the transfer, but has financed and
protected the establishment of settlements and armed and trained the colonial
Settlers; again with funds from Washington, D.C. Now those colonial settlers were
impressed with what was ,achieved, and according to one such settler: impressed with what was ,achieved, and according to one such settler: “We go Out on “We go Out on
Picnics to show those Arabs who controls this territory”. Picnics to show those Arabs who controls this territory”.
; : ; : . .
(Mr. Terei, Palestine Liberation Organization) . . .
Is provoking a confrontation mere arrogance , or is that arrogance coupled With
malicious criminal intent? The settlers also said: "If this is only. a peaceful
confrontation, then let it be bloody."
Everyone here is aware of the story that made headlines: a gir,l is killed
when a bullet hits and kills one of a group of settlers picnicking 7 settlers do g0
picnicking. That bullet came from the gun of one of the guards, a civilian
carrying an M.16 gun made in the United States and donated by the united States.
Immediately, all hell broke loose. But it was not confined only to the settlers;
the Israeli army immediately took charge. And what did it do? It merely went to
the neighbouring village and demolished houses there and started deporting en masse
a nutier of.Palestinians, some of whom, as has been reported to the Council, came
from'that little village of Beita. I am sure one could not find the name of that- '.
village on a map, for it is such a small village. . But here the settlers-came out
for a picnic, provoking the villagers , stealing their water, shooting and killing I
one of them and then blaming others, saying Well,, maybe it was a mistake". _
No, such a plea is unacceptable. The Israeli army was behind it; the
occupying Power is fully responsible for that crime; and I think that the Council
should stress the point that that is the responsibility of Israel, the occupying
Power. And there cannot be any plea ; otherwise we should be reminded of the fellow
that stood before the judge and said: "Your Honour, it is true that I killed my
father, but please have pity on me for I am an orphan now." That is not the way
the Council handles matters. The Council is duty-bound to condemn Israel for
having participated in, if not planned, those criminal acts that led to
deportations and the demolishing of the village. Here I wish to repeat that the
Secretary-General did very well in making his 12 April statement.
(Mr. Tetzi, Palestine) 1 Liberation Organization)
Rut just as the' elephants, we the Palestinians do not forget. All this is
taking place at almost the same time, to the day, as what happened in 1948. On
9 April 1948 murder.ers went into the peaceful village of Deir Yassin - under the
command of people like Begin and others - and killed more than 290 unarmed
civilians, giving rise to a campaign of intimidation which to a great extent proved
to be the genesis of the Palestine refugee problem and the dispersion of the
Palestinian people.
Rut let me reiterate that the Palestinian people are now determined not only
to persevere and maintain their steadfastness in their own homes, but those who
were expelled in 1948 are determined to adhere to their right to return to their
homes and property.
What is to be done? We believe that the Council - when not frustrated by one
of its permanent members - has sufficient powers vested in it to ensure respect for
its decisions,.and its members, individually and collectively, are duty-bound to
ensure respect for the provisions of the Geneva COnVentiOn-
The Council must in the discharge of its responsibilities act in such .a way as
to provide an end to Israeli policies and practices, such as deportation,
demolition of property, individual'as well as general, including houses, villages
and towns. The Council is also called upon to address the root caUSet the
underlying problem:. the need to end the Israeli occupation and the need to
establish conditions that:will enable the Palestinian people to exercise freely its'
inalienable rights, primarily the right to self-determination in its own homeland -
Palestine. The Council is called upon to support the endeavours of the
Secretary-General to carry out the task of convening the International Peace
Conference, under the auspices of the United Nations , a Conference whose guidelines.
and participants have already been determined. The Council cannot and should not
permit Israel to commitdaily crimes of mass deportation and the slow elimination
(Mr. Ter zi, Palestine Liberation Organizationl . .
of the Palestinian people. The Council should not let us lose faith in its
efficacy and in the need to resort to it,in seeking humanitarian and political
succor, justice and peace.
I thank the representative of the Palestine Liberation
Organization for the kind words he addressed to me and my country. _
Mr. RANA (Nepal): I wish to extend my warm congratulations to you, Sir,
on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the month of April. MY
delegation holds you in high esteem for your many personal qualities as for your
professional competence. We are particularly pleased that such an eminent
representative of Zambia -. a country with which Nepal has very close and
co-operative relations - is presiding over the Council at this important period of
our work.
I wish'also to avail myself of this opportunity to place on record our deep
appreciation to the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia for the very able manner
iA which he guided the work of the Council during'the busy month of March.
When we met on 30 March to consider the situation in the occupied territories,
we had the privilege of listening to the statements of the'Foreign Minister of
Algeria and other members of the Arab ministerial delegation. They not Only gave
elogUent expression to the concerns,of the international community over the tragic
developments but also placed the events in proper perspective. The Council decided
to keep the situation under review , and the hope was that Israel would at long last
take cognizance of the international consensus. Events, however, have proved
otherwise. Israel has resorted to harsher and more repressive measures in dealing
with the popular uprising," which is now in its fifth month. The systematic
dStiUCtiOtl Of life and property and the widespread detentions defy all attempts to
rationalize such. action in terms of requirementsto maintain law and order.
(Mr. Pana, Nepal)
As if those repressive measures were not enough, Israel has nw once again
resorted to deportation of the Palestinians, in total defiance of Security Council
resolutions 607 (1988) and 608 (1988) and in direct contravention of the Fourth
Geneva Convention of 1949. The Council cannot but strongly denounce Israel for the
flagrant disregard of its resolutions and for its refusal to accept the de jure
application of the provisions of the Convention to Gaza and the West Bank.'
The continued occupation of the West Bank and Gaza by Israel since 1967 is in
itself cause enough to spur a popular unrest. This has been further fuelled by the
repressive measures adopted by the Israeli security forces. The first challenge
before the Council is therefore to end the cycle'of violence there. That will, in
our view, help to create an atmosphere conducive to the search for a negotiated
settlement of the Middle East problem.
Nepal has always supported and is ready to support any initiative designed to
promote the cause and conditions of peace in that region of continuing tension and
turmoil. We were therefore disappointed to note that the recent initiative of-the
American Secretary of State, Mr. George Shultz, failed to make the needed
breakthrough. Israel continues to take an uncompromising attitude towards all
international initiatives. That attitude of continued intransigence will never
help the larger cause of peace in the Middle East. On the contrary, it will
prolong violence and, in sum, further aggravate the human misery. The longer the
tragedy lasts, the longerwill the Palestinian - as well as the Israeli - people
suffer.
The Security Council has on several occasions come up with concrete proposals
to end this long-drawn-out tragedy. Nepal supports those efforts because they are
consistent with our view of a comprehensive , just and lasting peace in the Middle
East. We continue to believe that Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and
(Mr, .Rana, Nepal)
338 (1973), together with-other relevant resolutions of the Council and the General
Assembly, provide a viable framework for a negotiated settlement.
My delegation wishes to record its appreciation of the Secretary-General's
untiring efforts to help the peace efforts. He has very succinctly pointed out
that the underlying problem of the Middle-East can be resolved only through a
political settlement that responds both to the aspirations of the Palestinian
people for a separate homeland and to Israel's efforts to ensure the security and
well-being of its people. An internationai conference, under the auspices of the
United Nations and with the participation of all parties concerned, would be the
aL?PrOprfate forum to begin the process of meeting the demands of both parties. For
our part, we will be willing to lend whatever support we can to further the Cause
of peace in the Middle East.
I thank the representative of Nepal for the kind words he
addressed to me.
The next speaker is His Excellency Mr. Oscar Oramas Oliva, Acting Chairman of
the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,
to whom the Council has extended an invitation under rule 39 of its provisional
rules of procedure. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to make
his statement.
Mr. ORAMAS OLIVA (Cuba), Acting Chairman, Committee on the Exercise of
the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (interpretation from Spanish):
First, Sir., I should like to thankyou for havli;ng invited me to speak in my
capacity as Acting Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable
Rights of the Palestinian People as the Security Council resumes its consideration
of the grave situation in the occupied Palestinian territories. I should also like
to congratulate you on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the
month Of April and to say that we have the fullest confidence in your well-proven
(Mt. Oramas Oliva, Acting Chairman, Committee on the ejcercise.of'-the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People)
ability as a diplomat to guide our work ,on this difficult subject. I should .alsa
like to extend our warm thanks and congratulations to the Permanent Representative
of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for his flawless perfOrmke as
President of the Council for the month of March.
Today's meeting marks the fifth time since the beginning of this year and the
sixth time since last December that the Security Council has had to meet to review
the deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories. This
demonstrates the deep concern with which the international community views Israeli
policies and Practices in the region , which have been universally ,repudiated. In a
number of resolutions adopted since last December the Security Council has
unanimously reaffirmed that the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of
Civilian PerSOnS in Time of War of 12 August 1949 is applicable to the Palestinian
and other Arab Territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem- It
has called upon Israel , as the occupying Pcwer, to-abide by that Conventioh
immediately and scrupulously and to desist forthwith from its policies and
Practices that are in contravention of the Convention and that have caused
fatalities and injuries among defenceless Palestinian civilians. The Council has
also called upon Israel to rescind the order to deport Palestinian civilians and to
ensure the safe and immediate return to the occupied Palestinian territories Of
those already.deported, as well as to desist forthwith from deporting any other
Palestinian civilians from hoccupied territories.
Notwithstanding those resolutions and the emphatic appeals addressed to Israel
by the entire international community, the Israeli authorities have, continued and
intensified their policy-of suppression , which is aimed at the whole of the
.Palestinian population and designed to crush the opposition by military means,
(Mr. Ora& Oliva, Acting Chairman, Committee on theaExercise of the , Inalienable,Rights of the Palestinian People)
In a number of letters addressed to,the Secretary-General and the President of
the'security Council, as well as in a number of statements made in the Council, our
Committee has voiced its growing concern over the escalation of repressive measures
by Israel, the occuping Pawer. In the past few months, since the beginning of the
Palestinian uprising, the number of Palestinians who have died as a result of
Israeli army gunfire has risen to at least 138. They include women and children. ,,
Many others have died as a result of beatings or the inhalation of tear gasI and
hundreds have been wounded.
The Israeli authorities have resorted to increasingly drastic measures of
collective punishment, including mass arrests, beatings, the interruption Of
supplies of food and fuel, prolonged curfews, the cutting of international
telephone lines, severe travel restrictions, the demolition of.houses and the
uprooting of trees and economic and financial sanctions. The activity of the media
has been restricted over large areas in order to prevent the international public
and the Israeli people from observing the extent of the abuses of human rights in
the occupied territories.
Three days ago the Israeli authorities deported eight Palestinian leaders to
southern Lebanon, ignoring Security Council resolutions 607 (1988) and 608 (19881,
adopted in January. The deportation has been ordered of another 12 Palestinians,
six from the village of Beita , where the Israeli army has adopted extensive
measures of collective punishment to avenge the recent death of a young Israeli
girl, even though the Israeli army itself has stated that she was killed
a&dentally by her bodyguard, and not by Palestinians, as had originally been
reported. According to recent reports, the Israeli authorities have declared that . . :
they will.continue the deportations as a deterrent ,and that they will apply
whatever .measures they deem necessary to crush the uprising.
In the light of those grave events, the Committee on the Exercise of the
Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People wishes to put on record again its
condemnation of those policies and practices of the occupying Power, which
'contravene the Fourth Geneva Convention‘, international instruments on human rights
and the relevant United Nations resolutions. Israel's 'resort to mounting .'
repression presents new obstacles to the international efforts to bring about a
canprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of Palestine, which is the
main goal of our Committee and of the.United Nations as a whole. The situation is
so serious that all those concerned must use every possible means to guarantee the
security and protection of the Palestinians civilians living under occupation; it
is so serious'that .we must .redouble our joint efforts to secure the convening Of an
interna.tional peace conference on the Middle East, in accordance with General
Assembly resolution 3a/5a c. We wish to reiterate that such a conference is the
most practical -and most widely accepted proposal for bringing about a solution to
this long-standing problem. We urge the Council to take'measures to that end
before it is too late.'
On behalf of the Committee on the Rxercise of the Inalienable Rights of the
Palestinian People, I appeal to the Secretary-General to implement the
.recommendations in his report (s/19443) of 21 January this year , so that the
necessary humanitarian assistance can be provided to the long-suffering Palestinian
people in the occupied territories. .,
1 thank the Acting Chairman of the Committee on the
Exercise of.the Inalienable Rights of-the Palestinian People for his kind words
.addressed to me.
Mr. PEJIC (Yugoslavia): I wish first, Sir, to express my delegation's ,
great and sincere satisfaction at seeing you presiding over the Council's work for
the month of April. Our two countries - Zambia and Yugoslavia - have the closest
relations bilaterally and in our very close co-operation within the Non-Aligned
Movement. We in Yugoslavia have a great regard and respect for the important and
constructive role your country is playing in international affairs and in enhancing
our pursuit of the goals of freedom, independence, peace and justice. I am, pf. .
course, aware of your high diplomatic and political qualities, which you have so
amply displayed in the work of the Council and the United Nations in past years.
We'are confident that under your'leadership the Council will perform its tasks
successfully.
I also wish to thank all those representatives who said,kind words about my
presidency of the Council in.March.
The uprising of the Palestinian population in the occupied territories and its
courageous resistance to the brutal measures and acts of the occupation authorities
hasattracted the attention and elicited the broadest sympathy and support of.the
international community for more than four months now. The gravity and canplexity
Of the existing situation were best illustrated by the members of the ministerial
delegation of the Arab League, led by the Foreign Minister of Algeria, in their
statements in the Security Council during ,its debate on 30 March.
Since then the situation-has unfortunately further deteriorated. We have
witnessed even mOre repressive measures. In addition to daily killings of
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, the Israeli occupation authorities have
. . (Mr. Pejic, Yugoslavia) (Mr. Pejic, Yugoslavia)
started blowing up the homes of Palestinian families and renewed the deportation of started blowing up the homes of Palestinian families and renewed the deportation of
Palestinians, which was condemned by resolutions 607 (1988) and 608 (1988), adopted Palestinians, which was condemned by resolutions 607 (1988) and 608 (1988), adopted
by the Security Council at the beginning of this year. This practice of the by the Security Council at the beginning of this year. This practice of the
occupation authorities, the brutality of which is there for the world to see day in occupation authorities, the brutality of which is there for the world to see day in
and day out, comes as a shock to, and causes the indignation of, the international
and day out, comes as a shock to, and causes the indignation of, the international
community. :
community. : The tense $ituation in the West Bank and Gaxa, The tense $ituation in the West Bank and Gaxa, as a result of the systematic as a result of the systematic
.and persistent denial and continuous violation of the basic human rights of the .and persistent denial and continuous violation of the basic human rights of the . . Palestinian people and its'aspiration to decide ,, freely and independently, on its '
Palestinian people and its'aspiration to decide ,, freely and independently, on its '
own fate, presents the most serious threat to international peace and security and ~
own fate, presents the most serious threat to international peace and security and ~ makes it incumbent upon the Security Council to respond resolutely and take its own makes it incumbent upon the Security Council to respond resolutely and take its own
position regarding these events. position regarding these events.
Israel's fruitless attempts to suppress, by the most brutal methods and means,
Israel's fruitless attempts to suppress, by the most brutal methods and means,
the unrest and demonstrations of the Palestinian population, which are the , expression of the unanimous refusal of the Palestinians further to tolerate foreign
the unrest and demonstrations of the Palestinian population, which are the , expression of the unanimous refusal of the Palestinians further to tolerate foreign
occupation and domination, should therefore not only be considered by the Security
occupation and domination, should therefore not only be considered by the SecuritY
Council, but should be its priority preoccupation until a comprehensive, just and .
Council, but should be its priority preoccupation until a comprehensive, just and . lasting solution of the Middle East crisis and the problem of.Palestine, which is lasting solution of the Middle East crisis and the problem of.Palestine, which is
at its core, is achieved.
at its core, is achieved.
The vehemence of the Palestinian protest has 'finally broken the 20iyear
The vehemence of the Palestinian protest has 'finally broken the 20iyear
illusion that the occupation can be legalized over time and that it is possible to ., -' ensure one's own security on the basis of the semblance 'of military might and the
illusion that the occupation can be legalized over time and that it is possible to ., -' ensure one's own security on the basis of the semblance 'of military might and the
policy of expansion. policy of expansion.
. .
In this sensethe blockade of the areas inhabited by the Palestinians and the
prohibition of the media so that it cannot report the truth of the events are'yet
another proof of the impotence of the occupation authorities' attempts to suppress
the resistance of the Palestinian population. What causes us concern, however, is
the fact that, despite the broadest criticism and condemnation, including by its
closest friends and allies, Israel remains consistent in its attempts to suppress,
by force and repression, the firm readiness of the Palestinian children and youth
torealise their legitimate goals and demands in an unequal struggle with the
Israeli occupation authorities. It has been proved time and again that no
measures, including beatings, deportations, intimidation, humiliation, torture of
detainees and countless other brutal and inhuman acts of the occupation
authorities, reminiscent of the darkest pages of a not so distant past, that offend
human dignity in the crudest way , can discourage a people resolved to decide on it6 ,' own' fate freely and independently.
Therefore we cannot but repeat our surprise and dismay that the leaders of the
country whose people experienced untold sufferings in recent history should I advocate the application of brutal means and measures against those struggling for
freedom, human dignity , maintenance of their national identity and their own
homeland.
We therefore consider that the Security Council is in duty bound to respond
most resolutely to such a state of affairs and to undertake resolute measures in
order to overcome it speedily: We also consider that, as part of the measures and
steps that should be taken to alleviate the situation, it is necessary urgently and
Without delay to implement and respect Security Council resolutions 605 (1987),
607 (1988) and 608 (1988), which inter alia request Israel fully to respect and
implement in the occupied territories the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the
Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and to desist from deportation
measures.
(Mr.~Pejic, Yugoslavia)
It is high time Israel understood that as long as it continues to OCCupY
foreign territories there will not be, nor can there be, peace and security in any
country of the region, including Israel, and that continuation of this situation
will be a source of dangerous tension as well as of new tribulations and permanent
instability for Israel itself and for the region as a whole.
We should like also to repeat on this occasion that the continued rejection
- and postponement of the process for a just and lasting solution to the problem of
Palestine based on the authentic aspirations of the Palestinian people, as well as
the legitimate interests of Israel, will cause unforeseeable damage also to Israel
and its positions. We sincerely believe that realization of the untenability of
occupation has taken hold at least in some political quarters in Israel and that
they will draw appropriate conclusions from that realization.
The recent consultations of the Secretary-General have shown that there exists
unanimity in the Security Council that developments in the occupied territories
require an urgent quest for a political settlement of the problem. In the opinion
Of Yugoslavia, as well as of the majority of Members of our Organisation, this
implies Israel's withdrawal from all Arab and Palestinian territor-ies occupied
since 1967, realization of the inalienable right of the Palestinian people under
the leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO1 to =
self-determination, their own homeland and r-espect for the rights of all the
countries of the region, including Israel, to peace, security and existence within
internationally recognized borders.
The dramatic developments in the occupied territories are a' warning sign that .i it is our common obligation speedily 'to proceed to bring about an urgent solution
of the Problem of Palestine since it'is an illusion that it can contfnuously be
pushed to the sidelines of Middle East events.
(Mr. Pejic, Yugoslavia)
' It is our firm belief that the most realistic and acceptable way to bring
about a solution of the Middle East crisis and'the problem of Palestine is the
Speedy convening of an international conference under United Nations auspices with
the equitable participation of all directly interested parties, including the PLO.
In this context we support every constructive effort that would lead to the
commencement of serious and substantive consultations.with a view to finding the
broadest possible acceptable basis for a substantive breakthrough towards the peace
process. Along those lines we fully support the efforts of the Secretary-General
on the basis of General Assembly resolution 42/66 D.
AS in the past, Yugoslavia will continue to spare no effort and endeavour to
bring about realization of, that goal. At this important juncture, that iS our
cmanon historic obligation and debt to the unrealized aspirations and rights of the
Palestinian people as well as to peace and security in that part of the world. We .
therefore believe that this debate will contribute to the acceleration of efforts
to achieve a solution of the problem of Palestine since each and every postponement
is fraught with dangers , with potentially unforeseeable consequences for
international peace and security-
I thank the representative of Yugoslavia for the kind
words he addressed to me. \ The next speaker is the representative of Tunisia. I invite him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. GREZAL (Tunisia) (interpretation from Arabic): At the outset I wish
on behalf of the Tunisian delegation to.extend to you, Sir, warm congratulations on
your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council for this month; We are
confident that you will be able fully to discharge the responsibilities of the
presidency thanks to your personal skills and competence and the high regard for
your fraternal country, Zambia, which is the current Chairman of the Organisation
of African Unity and at the same time steadfastly faces one of the strongholds of
racism and aggression, the Pretoria regime of South Africa.
Allow me also to pay a tribute to your predecessor, Ais Excellency
Ambassador Pejic, the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia to the United Nations,
who presided over the work of the Council last month, demonstrating prudence,
knowledge and skill.
The Council has been convened several times in recent monas to examine the
situation in the occupied Arab territories in view of the grave deterioration there
that has resulted from the fierce campaign of oppression perpetr.ate.d by the Zionist
occupation forces against the unarmed Palestinian people in the occupied
territories, especially since the beginning of the glorious uprising of the
Palestinian people on 9 Uecember last. The Council has adopted its
resolutions 605 (1987), 607 (1988) and 608 (1988) on that critical situation, . condemning the oppressive practices of the Israelf occupation forces, calling upon
the Israeli authcrities to respect the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection
'of Civilian‘Persons in Time of War , and stating the need for a just 6OlUtion of the
Arab-Israeli conflict.
(Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia)
In accordance with the mandate in resolution 605 (1987) the Secretary-General
submitted to the Council a report, dated 21January 1988, in which he outlined
measures to ensure the protection of the defenceless Palestinian population in the
occupied territories; he emphasized that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution
which would take into account the legitimate rightsof the Palestinian people,
including its right to self-determination , was the only way to bring about peace
and security in the region.
But later the Council, hamstrung by the exercise of the veto, was unable to
take the‘action warranted by the existing situation in the occupied territories and
in keeping with its responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and
security.
All that took place while the Israeli occupation authorities persisted in
devising innovative acts of oppression and brutality against the. defenceless
Palestinian people in the occupied territories and while the Israeli authorities
pursued the Palestinians with acts of terrorism and aggression everywhere.
It is therefore no longer poss,ible to i&lore Israeli .practices in the occupied
Arab territories. And no one can deny that, especially as the international media
have exposed Israel's true nature as revealed in its brutal denial of human values
and the norms of international law. .Israel has been exposed as an expansionist,
colonialist entity, committing acts of aggression against an innocent, defenceless
people living in its own land.
Israel arrogantly boasts of democracy 'h , w ereas in fact there is'no difference
between it and the Pretoria re'gime, its ally. After all, .democracy is morality,.
equality and justice. The democracy claimed by the Zionist re'gime is exclusively
for the group,of occupiers who proclaim it in order to solidify their criminal
tendencies, while the victims have no rights whatever.
(Mr. .Ghezal, Tunisia)
The number of victims who havefallen as a result of bullets fired by Jewish
settlers and occupation forces, the burial of live persons, the crushing of bones,
the profanation of mosques and churches, the demolition of houses and the
deportation of those who reject occupation - even if in words only - have all been
committed by Israel and its occupation forces in the occupied territories. All
that has been testified to in the international media, both printed and broadcast.
_ This is not an isolated case or an accident but, as is well known, the declared
official policy announced by fskseli rulers in official statemnts. , Of what are the victims of this oppressian and brutality guilty? Their
patience with occupation exhausted, they have risen up in the face of oppression to
demand their right to live in freedom and dignity on their own land, armed only
with their rights and the stones that David hurled at Goliath.
There has been much talk about the pretext of maintaining law and order. We
are not aware that anyone in the occupied Palestinian territories ever invited
Israel to coke there or to maintain law and order there.
what about the security of the States and peoples of the region? who poses a
threat to the security of the region and its peoples?. Is it the one who clings to
his rights and dignity, or is’ it Israel which has usurped the territories of the
states and peoples of the region? Israel has established a State wi&out
recognized and fixed borders.
All that and the acts of oppression perpetrated by the occupation authorities
have violated all civilized behaviour:' food supplies have been cut off f ram the
civilian population ifi the occupied Palestinian territories, they have been denied,
medicines and drugs, pharmacies have been closed, they have been denied fuel
supplies, water too has been cut off, thousands have been detained,, schools have
been turned into prisons; in addition to all that, portions of the occupied
. .
(Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia)
territories have been sealed off and none dare venture outside, except the force6
Of Occupation and the Jewish settlers. All that has been taking place under a
media blackout imposed by the occupation forces. Israel has thus closely followed .
the example of South Africa: no television, no broadcast coverage;and no printed
press allowed to report to us the crimes being committed by the occupiers.
In recent days we have heard startling news of oppression and inhuman 1 k practices against the civilian population in the occupied territories because a
young girl from the settler population near ~eita Village in an occupied
Palestinian territory was killed. Israel started an uproar and its forces launched
a campaign of terror and murder against the defenceless, innocent villager6 of
Beita, The Government of Israel ordered mass demolition of homes and expulsion Of
a number of the villagers from their homeland. Israel took that action even ., though - as it turned out - it was aware that the villagers were innocent and had
not killed the girl. It was later proved that 6he was murdered by a shot fired by .. one of the Jewish settlers acting as escorts for a group of children.
That fact was well known 'to the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli army
authorities; yet the Israeli Prima Minister called for vengeance aga'inst Arab
Palestinians saying that God would avenge that girl's blood. However, I must say
here that Allah, the Lord, in His justice will avenge for the oppressed
Palestinians.
.:
.
'. :
(Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia) (Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia)
On the other hand, hundreds of defenceless and unarmed young Arabs, including
On the other hand, hundreds of defenceless and unarmed young Arabs, including
women and children were killed and thousands of others wounded and arrested; scores
women and children were killed and thousands of others wounded and arrested; scores
have been expelled and homes and villages have been demolished. NO attention has
have been expelled and homes and villages have been demolished. NO attention has
been given to all these crimes , as though these people were not human beings.
been given to all these crimes , as though these people were not human beings.
Their dignity has,not been respected. They are treated as if they did not have any
Their dignity has,not been respected. They are treated as if they did not have any
rights or aspirations like,other human beings. In fact, in the view of the'Israeli
rights or aspirations like,other human beings. In fact, in the view of the'Israeli
_ Prime Minister, these Palestinians are "grasshoppers". On another occasion he
_ Prime Minister, these Palestinians are "grasshoppers". On another occasion he
described the Palestinians, in comparing them to Israel, as flies fighting an
described the Palestinians, in comparing them to Israel, as flies fighting an
elephant. His Minister of Defence spoke about a struggle between two wills, and he
elephant. His Minister of Defence spoke about a struggle between two wills, and he
emphasized to the Palestinians that he would emerge victorious, as if preparing
emphasized to the Palestinians that he would emerge victorious, as if preparing
himself for a sports match. But in fact he was inflicting on a defenceless people
himself for a sports match. But in fact he was inflicting on a defenceless people
acts of oppression, suppression and brutality.
acts of oppression, suppression and brutality.
After all this, are we levelling unfair charges against Israel when we accuse After all this, are we levelling unfair charges against Israel when we accuse
it of committing acts of aggression and oppression and of carrying out inhuman
it of committing acts of aggression and oppression and of carrying out inhuman
practices? Are we unfair when we describe the Israeli rulers as racists and
practices? Are we unfair when we describe the Israeli rulers as racists and
criminals? After all this, is it surprising that the victims of arrogance,
criminals? After all this, is it surprising that the victims of arrogance,
prejudice and oppression should resort to the Council and call for its convening in
prejudice and oppression should resort to the Council and call for its convening in
order to seek justice an,d ensure protection for themselves?
order to seek justice an,d ensure protection for themselves?
What is indeed strange is the unique status of Israel in the world. Israel What is indeed strange is the unique status of Israel in the world. Israel
commits all these crimes and few voices are raised against it, let alone to blame commits all these crimes and few voices are raised against it, let alone to blame
it for such crimes. But Israel, given its clout , can commit the most heinous
it for such crimes. But Israel, given its clout , can commit the most heinous
crimes while ensuring that no one will pay attention to them. .ISrael invades and
crimes while ensuring that no one will pay attention to them. .ISrael invades and
here and there strikes at will while others rush to find excusesY not ascribing ;
here and there strikes at will while others rush to find excusesY not ascribing ; terrorism to Israel but to its victims. Israel manufactures dozens of nuclear terrorism to Israel but to its victims. Israel manufactures dozens of nuclear
bombs, and no voices are raised among those who call for denuclearization. But
bombs, and no voices are raised among those who call for denuclearization. But
those who try to acquire conventional weapons in order to defend their land and
those who try to acquire conventional weapons in order to defend their land and
(Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia)
boundaries, or others who seek to acquire technology even if it ‘is to be used Only
for peaceful purposes, have their peaceful installations demolished by Israel
without any blame being ascribed to Israel.
However, the uprising of the Palestinian people and the generation which hurls
stones in the occupied terri.tories have exposed the true nature.of Israel.
Brutalities, regardless of their scope and level, will not undermine the will of
the Palestinian people to have its full na,tional rights restored. The Palestinian
people has regained its dignity;’ it has .dispelled fear and replaced it by a
determination to emerge victorious.
The critical deter ioration of the situation in the occupied territories makes
it imperative for the Council, which is the custodian of international peace and
security, to shoulder -its full responsibility and to take adequate measures in
order to ensure the-protection and safety of the Palestinianpopulation in the
occupied territories and to give them hope that their legitimate rights will.
eventually be recognized, including the right to self-determination and the
establishment df an independent State on their own land, in order to put an end to
the practices of the occupation forces and to ensure respect for the Fourth Geneva,
Convention telatiVe to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.
The tragic events in the occupied Arab territories emphasize the urgent need
for a comprehensive, just and lasting settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict,
especially in regard to the problem of the Palestinian people. The Arab States and
the Palestine Liberation Crganization (PLC) have expressed their. firm determination
to contribute to the resolution of the conflict on the basis of international law;
as Provided for in the resolutions adopted by. U&Security Council and the General
Assembly, especia.lly as outlined in the Fez.Peace Plan submitted in 1982.
(Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia) (Mr. Ghezal, Tunisia)
That commitment was reaffirmed-in the November 1987 Amman summit meeting, That commitment was reaffirmed-in the November 1987 Amman summit meeting,
which supported the convening of an international peace conference,, under the which supported the convening of an international peace conference,, under the
auspices of the United Nations auspices of the United Nations , with the participation of all parties concerned on , with the participation of all parties concerned on
an equal footing, including the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the sole, an equal footing, including the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the sole,
legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and the permanent metiers Of and the permanent metiers Of
the Security Council. the Security Council.
In the present circumstances, we feel that the Council is duty-bound to In the present circumstances, we feel that the Council is duty-bound to
enforce its previous resolutions 605 (1987), enforce its previous resolutions 605 (1987), 607 (1988) and 608 [198.8), and to 607 (1988) and 608 [198.8), and to
implement the Secretary-General's recommendations contained in h$s report of implement the Secretary-General's recommendations contained in h$s report of
21 January 1988, 21 January 1988, in which he calls upon the international communityrthrough the in which he calls upon the international communityrthrough the
Security Council, to take urgent action towards the convening of the international Security Council, to take urgent action towards the convening of the international
peace conference. peace conference.
The PRESIDENT: I thank the representative of Tunisia for his kind words I thank the representative of Tunisia for his kind words
addressed to me. addressed to me.
The next speaker is the representative of Kuwait. The next speaker is the representative of Kuwait. I invite,him to take a I invite,him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his statement. place at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. ABUIXASAN (Kuwait) (interpretation from Arabic): Mr. ABUIXASAN (Kuwait) (interpretation from Arabic): It gives us ,great It gives us ,great
pleasure, Sir, pleasure, Sir, to see you presiding over the Security Council for this month. We to see you presiding over the Security Council for this month. We
are confident that, thanks to-your wise leadership, well-known diplomatic are confident that, thanks to-your wise leadership, well-known diplomatic
experience and professional abilities, experience and professional abilities, the Council'will be able to achieve optimum the Council'will be able to achieve optimum
results. results. We are particularly pleased that you represent a country - Zambia - that We are particularly pleased that you represent a country - Zambia - that
is friendly to Kuwait. is friendly to Kuwait.
We should also like to express our thanks and appreciation to your We should also like to express our thanks and appreciation to your
predecessor, the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia, for hi-s able conduct Of predecessor, the Permanent Representative of Yugoslavia, for hi-s able conduct Of
the work of the Council in a month that was replete with the most important the work of the Council in a month that was replete with the most important
international causes. international causes.
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
As the Palestinian popular uprising nears the end of its fourth month, the
.number of its martyrs has reached more than 150, and every day more martyrs c continue to fall. These great.and remarkable sacrifices of the uprising have
proved that the struggle of the Palestinian people, after more than 20 years of
occupation, is a type of resistance that can neither be denied nor be branded as
terrorism. What is taking place in occupied Palestine reflects a new and serious
element. The uprising is not mere rioting; it is a new human effort made by the
Palestinian people for the restoration of its usurped human rights. The uprising
has destroyed the policy and the myth of the status quo, which is considered by
Israel and, in particular, by the Likud party, as the best possible situation. It
has destroyed 20 years of myopic Israeli occupation, which now lies in ruins in the
Streets of the West Bank, Caza and East Jerusalem. The Israeli occupation
continues to weigh heavily upon the lives of 1.5 million Palestinians, keeping them
as a source of cheap manual labour , while denying their basic human rights, which
are guaranteed by all relevant international laws, instruments and norms, and in
particular by the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. And yet the proud Palestinian
people rose up to express its sense of frustration and bitterness and its political
will in so determined a manner that it surprised even the Israelis and their
leaders. The Palestinian people has declared to the whole world its rejection of
the hateful policy of occupation. The uprising has caused a profound change in
Israeli society. It has created a new and irrevocable situation and has taught a
strong lesson about the limits of Israeli power.
Indeed, despite its might, the Israeli army remains incapable of quelling the
uprising and Of breaking the will of the Palestinian people now in revolt. The
uprising even broke the myth 'of a united Jerusalem when the Palestinian people in
East J&usalem and its suburbs, areas occupied before 1967, joined the uprising.
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
The commercial strike in East Jerusalem, which lasted longer than any other similar
strike in the West Bank or Gaza, was also clear proof of that fact, despite the
severe measures taken by the occupying authorities , ~such as the closing of all
Schools in East Jerusalem, The uprising has changed the. concept. of Israel as a
country, and even Israel’s sense of history. Questions that could have been put
Off for many years have Coma to the forefront and have imposed themselves on the
situation today. This radical change has been made by’ the stone-throwing heroes,
who have proved to the world that their just cause and struggle will’never be
obfuscated , no matter how short the world ‘6 memory.
Among the truest of the words spoken about the Palestinianuprising and its
heroes were those of His myal Highness the Emit of the State of Kuwait last
Saturday at the inauguration of. the meeting of. the Bureau of the Fifth Islamic
Summit in Kuwait. He said:
“They are a new generation; they are a new life that has bloomed in the
good earth - a generation of people who have faith in their hear.ts, plans in
their minds and the stones of their homeland in. their hands, The question of
Palestine is ‘a constant responsibility. It is. a living crea,ture that breathes
with two lungs: one is internal resistancet the other is external support.
The internal resistance is nobly discharging its duty.. The external support
remains a test of the sincerity of intentions , as well as of genuine deeds*
.and not mere words. This uprising is the voice of truth, which has destroyed
the wall of silence that the Israeli entity is trying to impose. on the
question. We must protect that truth from the storms of politicking and from
‘open or tacit conspiracies. We must ensure that this unequal ba-ttle, Yn which
the fierceness and tyranny of the enemy increases daily I is not prolonged.
The uprising is the-explicit embodiment of the Palestinian people’s
(Mr..Abulhasan, Kuwait) . . determination to regain its inalienable rights, including the right to
self-determination and the establishment of independent statehood on
Palestinian soil, under the leadership.of its sole, legitimate representativer
the Palestine Liberation Organization. NOW that fury has erupted in the
blessed land, after patience had worn thin and after the falsehood of Promises
has become'clear, Palestine has become the litmus test of the commitment of
the great Powers to human rights."
Nevertheless, Israel and some of its sympathizers continue to dream that force
and repression can quell this popular uprising. Indeed, since the beginning of the
uprising, the Israelis have employed all sorts of oppression and collective
punishments to quell it, but they will never be able to do so. The uprising iS now
into its fifth month and the number of its martyrs continues to increase. This
reaffirms that not even death will deter the Palestinians from continuing their
revolution, regardless of the repressive measures used by Israel, whether those
include burying people alive, bulldozing their homes, breaking the arms and legs of
unarmed children, women, young people and the elderly, or the use of tear gas.
Evidence of Palestinian determination can'be seen in the hospitals in Gaza and the
West Bank; which are filled with Palestinians whose bones have been broken.
One of U-&painful paradoxes is that when an Israeligirl was killed by a'
Jewish settler charges were instantly directed at the struggling Palestinian
people. That offers-proof once again of the severity of the Israeli occupation
authorities, their repressive measures and their policy of collective punishment,
which is aimed at the sub juga tion and silencing of the Palestinian people.
Immediately after the killing of the Israeli girl, the Israeli army demolished six
Arab houses ‘in that village. After the investigation by' the Israeli army proved
that the population of the village was innocent of the charge of killing the
Israeli girl, the Israeli army nevertheless demolished eight more Arab houses and
followed that with the depor’tition of eight Palestinians to areas outside the
occupied Arab terri tar ies. There are many other Palestinians in. the occupied
territories who are awaiting the same destiny. . . These,collective punishments, which
took place after the killing of the Israeli girl, is one link in the chain that,
reflects the extent of the Israelis’ hatred of the .Arab population of the occupied
territories. The Jewish settlers and the leaders of Israel, in particular the V
Prime Minister ,, the Minister of Justice, Rabbis Druckmann and Kahane, and others,
-have all exploited the killing of that girl to fan the: flames of hatred -and revenge ,.’ .
against the Arab population. ,’
_ - “,.
. .
‘.
I
‘.
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
.
..
“.
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
Both Sharon and the Israeli Minister of Justice called for the taking of
corrective measures against the &ulation and, if necessary, wiping their village
off the map. Coming from Sharon, Shamir or others of their ilk, that is not new to
the history of Israel. 'According to a study by the American Friends Service
Committee, since 1967 Israel has deported no fewer than .1,156 Palestinians from
their homeland. Can we expect otherwise from Yitzhak Shamir, the Prime Minister of
the Zionist entity-who a few weeks ago declared that the Palestinian people would
be squashed like grasshoppers?
Israel has always refused the comparison made of it with the racist re'gime of
South Africa. Yet every day it reaffirms the validity of this canparison. Like
South Africa, Israel has imposed a news black-out on its practices, in this case
in the occupied Arab territories. -Despite the fact that Israel's friends and
sympathizers have denounced the inhuman practices in South Africa, Israel has not
done the same when it came to the murder of more than 160 and the injuring of
thousands of unarmed Palestinian civilians and when it was a question of the savage
treatment by the Israeli army of hundreds of Palestinians. The Jewish communities
have repeatedly told us that the silence and indifference of the majority of
peoples of the world facilitated Hitler's horrific oppression. what does their own
silence mean now7 Does it mean approval or indifference, or does it means
ewarrassment?
Israel and its sympathiiers have claimed that since its inception Israel has
had a noble mission in the field of human values in the world after the horrors of
the Second World War. As long ago as the days of Den Gurion, Israel's first Prime
Minister, it said:
"Israel will be a democracy. It can never survive without a democratic system
and without according just value to humanity and freedom."
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
Should we believe this? How can we be convinced that what is taking place in
the occupied.territories and what has taken place since Israel's inception is not
diametrically opposed to those noble human values on which they claim Israel is
based? ~ Kuwait believes that it is high time for Israel and its sympathizers to
realize that they can no longer ignore the legitimate rights of the Palestinian
people which are enshrined in international law and United Nations resolutions, in
particular those pertaining to the international conference, which constitutes the
only possible and internationally acceptable solution, resolutions ensuring the
inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to return to their homeland and to '. Self-determination and national sovereignty within their independent State. Israel
must realize that peace in the Middle East is conditional upon the solution of the
WeStiOn of the Palestinian people.' Such a solution cannot be achieved unless the
Palestinian people and their sole, legitimate representative, the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO), play a role in achieving it.
Israel and its friends must realize that the only path leading to political
talks conducive to such a peaceful solution is through tecognizing,the legitimacy
of the PLO and negotiating with it, for it is the sole, legitimate representative
of the Palestinian people. Any other path is doomed to failure. The only path
acceptable at the international and Arab levels is the convening of a Cdmpetent
international conference with the participation , on an equal footing, of all
parties concerned, .including the PLO, the sole, legitimate representative of the
'Palestinian people, and the five permanent members'of the Secutity Council.
Kuwait believes that the uprising of the Palestinian people has created new
circumstances of historic importance, in the light of which ,it is incumbent upon
the'Security Council to adopt the necessary measures to ensure the protection of
(Mr. Abulhasan, Kuwait)
the rights of the-Palestinian people under Israeli occupation. The ca@ianCe of
Israel, as the occupying PoweL, with the Fourth Geneva Convention constitutes the I
immediate central question which Israel must admit as the first essential step on
the path to the achievement of comprehensive peace, for occupation constitutes the
major obstacle in the path of peace in our region.
I thank the representative of Kuwait for his kind words
addressed to me.
The next speaker is the representative of Israel. I invite him to take a
place at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. JOPFE (Israel):' Mr. President,'on behalf of my delegation I should
like to congratulate you on your assumption of the presidency ofthe Council'for ,- this month.
Although our two countries do not maintain formal relations,.let us h'ope that
in the not too distant future our relations will return to what they used to be,
for the mutual benefit of our countries'and our peoples,
The Security Council is entrusted with the primary responsibility of
maintaining international peace and security , and should address the real issues
which endanger international peace.
The Proliferation in the use of chemical warfare and'the gassing of thousands
of innocent citizens in the prolonged conflict in the Gulf, and the hundreds buried
in the rubble caused'by the recent indiscriminate missile attacks in the infamous
"war of the citie.sn , are signs of a continued deterioration in a tragic situation.
The brutal specter of terrorism, the deliberate and ,systematic murder and
maiming of innocent civilians, continues to rear its ugly head. We are all
witnesses to the latest tragedy being played out as we convene here. '1.n the course
of the hijacking of a Kuwaiti airliner, two Kuwaiti nationals have been murdered in
(Mr. Jof fe, Israel) (Mr. Jof fe, Israel)
a most barbaric fashion. a most barbaric fashion. The perpertrators of the crimes have not accorded the The perpertrators of the crimes have not accorded the
KoSt basic of humanitarian respect even for the corpses. KoSt basic of humanitarian respect even for the corpses.
And this morning the Council is again acceding to Arab demands to convene it And this morning the Council is again acceding to Arab demands to convene it
on the occasion of any whim, not in a genuine pursuit of peacer but to devote its on the occasion of any whim, not in a genuine pursuit of peacer but to devote its
time and resources to a repeat performance of counter-productive rhetoric against time and resources to a repeat performance of counter-productive rhetoric against
Israel. Israel.
My Government has set forth two goalsr My Government has set forth two goalsr first, the restoration of tranquillity first, the restoration of tranquillity
to the areas of Judea, Samaria and .Gaza; and, secondly, to the areas of Judea, Samaria and .Gaza; and, secondly, the political resolution Of the political resolution Of
those territories* ultimate status. those territories* ultimate status.
But one issue must be made absolutely clear: But one issue must be made absolutely clear: Peaceful political negotiations Peaceful political negotiations
cannot proceed in the face of Molotov. cocktails, vicious stabbings and cannot proceed in the face of Molotov. cocktails, vicious stabbings and
rock-throwing, or under the threat of any violence whatsoever. rock-throwing, or under the threat of any violence whatsoever.
Any Government in similar circumstances’would, and should, invoke the rights Any Government in similar circumstances’would, and should, invoke the rights
to which it is due under international law: to which it is due under international law: the right to maintain the orderly the right to maintain the orderly
administration of territory under its control, administration of territory under its control, to ensure the security of all the to ensure the security of all the
inhabitants and of its armed forces. inhabitants and of its armed forces. That is the first and foremost duty of any That is the first and foremost duty of any
Government, military or civilian, whether‘the concern is territory that is Government, military or civilian, whether‘the concern is territory that is
sovereign, disputed or occupied. sovereign, disputed or occupied.
/ /
(Mr. Joffe, Israel)
The Fourth Geneva Convention is very clear on the matter. Let me quote the
relevant paragraph: 4 "The Occupying Pcwer may . . . subject the population of the occupied
territory to provisions which are essential . . . to maintain the orderly
governmsnt of the territory , and to ensure the security of the Occupying
Power, of the members and property of the occupying forces or administration.'
In our effort to restore tranquillity and order we have apprehended a network
of professional inciters and organisers of riots and violence. ~11 suspects taken
into custody are given due process of law, including the right to appeal up to the
Supreme Court of Israel, with appropriate legal representation. If evidence is
found against them, they are brought to trial. If not, they are released.
In a few hard-core cases involving those convicted of repeated violent
incitement and subversion on behalf of te.rrorist organizations and of acts of
terror, Israel has decided upon expulsion as one of the means of contributing to
the restoration of calm. Some may argue that that is against international law.
Is it? Article 63 of the Hague Begulations of 190; states that the Governing
Administration
"shall take all measures in its power to restore and ensure, as far as
possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely
prevented, the laws in force in the country."
That, exactly, is the basis of our actfons. We follow local laws,
The British Mandate set forth the first laws in the modern era, enacted in
this century. The Defence Emergency Regulations put in place by Great Britain in
1945 allowed expulsions. That provision was retained when the Hashemite Kingdom of
Jordan occupied Judea and Samaria for 19 years and was actually .implemented on
numerous bCCaSiOn.S, not only by Jordan but also by Egypt in the G&a district.
We have resorted to those measures only when absolutely necessary,.as is our
right under international law,
On 11April five residents of the Gaza Districtand three from
Judea-Samaria - the West Bank - were expelled. Furthermore, 12 other residents
were issued expulsion orders. Six of them are from the West Bank.villaqe of
Beita. The eight agitators who were expelled on 11 April and the 12 who were
issued expulsion orders have all been involved inincitement and subversion,
including the recent violence in the territories. They are leading activists and
chief instigators of the current unrest. The six residents from Beita were all
involved in the 6 April attack on a group of Israeli hikers, most of. them
teenagers. During that attack an Israeli girl was killed and 14 hik.er,s were
injured.
The agitators are long-standing and locally prominent meidsecs of extremist I organisations. Nine are,with Fatah and, in many of the cases, it$S gffiliated
"Shabiba" front youth organization; five with -militant Islamic fundamentalist
organizations; two with Hawatmeh's Marxist-oriented PDFLP - "Popular Democratic * _, Front for the Liberation of Palestine"; one with Habash's Marxist-oriented PLFP - I "Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine" and one with the Palestinian
Communist Party which,' in 1937, became part of the PLG. Following trials, 12 were
sentenced in the past to prison terms, some of them lengthy, for their terrorist
activities.
The newexpulsion orders concerning the 12 will be carried out @nly after the .- legal process is completed. The 12 have 96 hours in which to appeal the decision
before an advisor);' committee to the regional military commander-* In the event that
that petition is denied, they will have 48 hours to appeal to the fsraeli Supreme
Court, in its capacity as the High Court of Justice.
(Mr. Joffe, Israel)
The eight who were expelled were given the opportunity to submit appeals after
having received their expulsion orders several months ago. Three petitions were
rejected by the- High Court of Justice; four decided to waive their petition6 after
they saw the evidence aga5nst them; one decided from the outset not to appeal.
‘&day is Holocaust Day. Today; the Jewish people commemorate the memory of . 6 million Jewish martyrs of the Nazi Holocaust. It is with this .history still
fresh in our minds that we commit ourselves, first and foremost, to the.security
and survival of the Jewish State in its ancestral homeland.
As is its right and obligation; Israel will use all measures necessary ‘to
ensure peace and security in the territories under its administration, in
accordance with due process of law-
I thank the representative of Israel for his kind words
addressed to me.
The next speaker is the representative of Pakistani I invite him to take 8
place at the Council table and to make his statement.
Mr. &?LH NIWAZ (Pakistan) t Today,. the Security Council is meeting for
the sixth time since the Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation began on _-
9 December in the occupied West.Hank and Gaza Strip. It has rema ined continuously
seized of the situation in the occupied territories since then and has adopted
three resolutions, namelyc resolution 605 (1987) of 22 December 1987 and
resolutions 607 (1988) of S January arid 608 (1988) of 14 January 1988, Another
draft resolution is to be considered by the Security Council at its present
meeting6 in view of t&e continuation of the intensification of acts of repression
by the occupying authorities.
We congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Security
Council for this month, when the Council is being called upon to send yet another
(Mr. Shah Nawaz, Pakistan)
message to Israel to resile from its outrageous colonial approach to the question
of Palestine and to demonstrate its desire for genuine peace in the region, of
which it has so often boasted. We feel confident that your able and skilful
leadership will enable the Council to deal with this issue suitably and
effectively. We are particularly happy at your assumption of tie presidency of the
Security Council at this crucial stage not only because Pakistan enjoys a
. relationship-of close friendship and mutual respect with your great country but
also because you represent a country that is currently providing wise:leadership to
the Organization of African Unity and making a great contribution to the cause Of
peace, freedom and stability around the globe.
While assuring you of our full support of your endeavours to guide the
Security Council's deliberations to a successful conclusion, I also take this
opportunity of expressing our admiration for the exemplary manner in which
His Excellency Ambassador Dragoslav Pejic of Yugoslavia presided over the Council's
deliberations last month, when the Security Council remained occupied W%th the
Palestinian question and was addressed on the issue by the Foreign Ministers of
Algeria and Syria, the Minister of State of Saudi Arabia, the Secretary-General of
the League of Arab States and the head of the Political &partm.ent of the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO).
The meetings of the Security Council on the current situation in the occupied
territories are the only means by which the international community as a whole iS
able to express its deep concern at a tragedy being enacted in the West Hank and-
Gaza Strip and to demand that Israel desist from pursuing a poU.cy based on the US?
of force, which spells disaster for the cause of peace and stabilityin tha region,
(Mr. Shah Nawaz, Pakistan)
According to today's edition of The New York Times, at least 126 Palestinians
have been reported killed and an undetermined number wounded by Israeli gunfire,
beatings or tear gas in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. Protesters in the refugee
camps have been fired upon , and teenagers outside a school have received grievous
bodily injuries. A Palestinian woman is reported to have suffocated to death after
inhaling gas from-a canister thrown into her home by Israeli soldiers. This is
only a partial account of what may have happened, since the current Israeli policy
Of covering up'the violent confrontations includes restrictions on news coverage of
the incidents.
Israel ought to realize that the policy of unbridled repression that it
follows in the occupied ter,ritories will never succeed in extinguishing the spirit
of freedom which fuels the just Palestinian struggle. Driven to desperation, a
village north of Jerusalem, named Salfit, is reported to have declared itself
liberated from Israeli occupation. Some 70 Arabs were arrested 'for this symbolic
act of defiance. The writing on the walls of Salfit village is clear, and needs to
be correctly read by the Israeli authorities.
The focus-of attention during this Security Council debate must be the current
phase Of the policy of illegal deportation of Palestinians and the demolition of
Palestinian homes in the occupied territories to which the Israeli Government has
resorted, Obviously, the goal of this policy is to remove all obstacles to an
expanded Israeli settler presence in the occupied territories. The deportations
and demolitionsclearly violate the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of
Civilian Persons in Time of War, and have rightly been Condemned by the world
cormnunity as impermissible acts.
It is necessary for the Security Council at its current meetings to send an
appropriate message to the Israeli authorities, that under no circumstances will
(Mr. Shah Nawaz, Pakistan)
the international community
tolerate the policy of repression which has been
unleashed .in a vain attempt to put down an uprising ignited by their clwn actionsi-
They should realize that such unrealistic policies and actions will, not deter the
long-suffering people of Palestine from continuing their just struggle for
self-deterniination.
The PRHSIDHNT: f thank the representative of Pakistan for his, kind words
addressed to me. I.
I Call on the representative of the Palestine Liberation Organization, who has
asked to'make a .further stdtement.
'Mr. TERZi (Palestine Liberation'Organization. (PLO)):. As has just been
mentioned, this is a sad day - a day to remember the Holocaust., me would have
thought that this remembrance day would be a day of remembrance of'all the.victims
of the Holocaust - scores of millions, including nationals of diiferent Countries
and people of the-Jewish fa.ith. _'
The Holocaust is something that should never be repeated, whether it afflicted
those of the Jewish faith 'or the bther scores of millions in other countries. It
was not exclusive.'to one particular sect, . faction, religion or ethnic group. The
whole international community paid the price of almost 40 mill&on vict&ns of that
Holocaust~by the'racist Naiis, This sad remembrance day should have 'brought a
message to the racists in Tel Aviv to make them consider and redSSWS their '-
policies against.the Palestinian people, policies applied'simply because of that
people's‘ethnicity'&d where it belongs. Let-not those racists capital&e on those : massacres and the‘Holocaust, which was not exclusive.
The representative of Israel started by referring to the chemical warfare in
.the Gulf. I am sure he had not seen the statement issued by the.Ifnited.Nations
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), which I
read out earlier. To remind him, let me reread part of it, as-, followsi:
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Organisation)
"Hundreds of refugees have been treated in UNRWA clinics fOK tear gas,
inhalation. In some cases tear gas has been thrown inside homesc clinics and
schools where the effects are particularly severe., Agency dOCtOKs have also
seen symptoms'not normally connected with'regular tear gas and UNRWA is
seeking information on contents of gases used in order to provide the proper .
antidote and treatment, 'especially for the most vulnerable groups such as -
pregnant women, the very young and the elderly.". ;
Yet the representative of Israel has the audacity to speak about chemical warfare, .
when Israel itself is using a tear gas - OK some gas with different symptoms - I _
against clinics, homes and schools.
The peqetrators of the crime-are not those who are using kitchen knives, not
those who are using.stones., The perpetrators of the crime are those with machine
guns and tanks, with boots poised over the heads of Palestinians, including
children,. in the occupied territories. Those are the. perpetrators of the crime*
f3e were told'that according to the Geneva Convention &occupying Power has
to maintain security. Yes, but apparently security means tie elimination of the .
people under occupation, and that is not what the Geneva Convention purports,,to,,
provide. tit me remind the representative ‘of Israel that the Geneva Convention, :_.
explicitly says:,,
*Individual Or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of . .
protected persons from occupied territory to the, ,tetrbtory of the ,OccupyiW
Pwer OK to that of any other country , occupied oK not, ,are prohibited,,.
,, regardless of the.ir motive.. (Article 4%
So there is no question inthe Convention that deportation, regardless of motive, .,
should be applied by the occupying Power.
(Mr. Terzi, Palestine Liberation Grganization)
l&t me remind the representative of Israel again that the Geneva Convention
says:
"The Occupying Power shall not deport or-transfer parts of its own
civilian population into the territory it occupies.' (Ibid.1
It is prohibited from sending, departing, transferring the civilian population, the
Isra.eli population, -into the territory under occupation. That is exactly what the
Geneva Convention says.
Then we are told that Israel is doing nothing, that it is only applying
regulations introduced by the British under the Mandate, the Defence Emergency
.- Regulations of 1945. Let me-remind the representative of Israel that a Jewish
Palestinian of great repute in the legal world - if I remember rightly, it was
MK. Joseph - said of those emergency regulations that not even Sn Nazi Germany
would such regulations be promulgated or applied. Yet the Israelis tell us that
those regulations, which are criminal , worse than any under the,Nazf re'gime, wi-11
be applied; they themselves are seeking protection under something worse than the
Nazis would have introduced.
I am glad that the representative of Israel referred to the deportations as
expulsions. He said that the expulsions would go through a legal process. whe .th er
they are expulsions of deportations , what is the legal process?' He told us that
the people concerned go to an advisory committee, where the defence., should there
'be a defence , is not even shown the files, the summonses, the complaints aga-inst
those people.
(Mr. ,Ter si, Palestine Liberation Crganiza tion)
It is a farce;. it is a travesty of justice. The military are in no way under
n obligation to implement the decision of that advisory committee.
SO we do agree-that a political resolution should be resorted to. After all,
. .
n all the statements we have heard this morning that has been the trend: that
here Should be a political resolution, that the coqference under the auspices. of
he United Nations Should be the vehicle for peace - because if we cannot have
eace, as he said, under the threat of Molotov cocktails, how can we have peace 1
rider the threat of a new gas being used against the people, under the threat of
anks,. under the threat ‘of shootings and the killing of people at random, under the
Meat of deportation?
In view of the lateness of the hour, I intend to adjourn
he meeting now. The next meeting of the Security Council to continue the
onsideration of the item on ‘the agenda will take place tomorrow, Friday,
5 April 1988, at 10.30 a.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “S/PV.2805.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/S-PV-2805/. Accessed .