S/PV.566 Security Council

The representative of China in the United Nations can only be a persan nOl11inated by the lawflll government of Chinathe Central People's Government of the People's Repliblic of China. 2. The delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Repllblics therefore considers it illegal to confer the il1l1ctlons of President of the Security Council on the rcprcsentative of the Kuomintang group, who does not l'epresent China and is illegally occupying a seat in the Sccllrity Conncil. 3. The PRESIDENT: The presidency of the Secllrit y Council is regulated by mie 18 of our mIes of prclCec1l1re. The remarks of the representative of the Soviet Union are contrary to that rule. He is, therefore, out of order. System of interpretation +. The PRESIDENT: As nsnal, the speeches by members of the Council will receive both simultaneous and consecutive interpretation. Speeches by non-members participating in the debate will receive only simultaneotlS interpretatioll. The India-Paldstan question S. The PRESIDENT: Tt is with regret ta infarm the Council that MI'. Graham, Nations representative, is indisposed, l shaH not invite him to participate in this morning.

report [5/2375] presented. to the Secl11~lty 18 October, a copy of winch we have Ml'. Graham, the United Nations representative lndia and Pakistan, rec0111l11ended that COlmcil decided in favour of a renewed the agreement of the Governments Pakistan to the proposaIs fol' demilitarization made to them, he might be instructed negotiations with the parties. 7. Members of the Council will, l am own aclmiration for the ability and devotion MI'. Graham to this c1ifficult task. They l am sure, support my view that, if view there is any chance that, by a further brief periQ(] of negotiation, agreement parties can be reachec1 or substantial agreement macle, that chance should JUr. Graham does consider a prospect progrcss exists is eviùent. 8. lt is therefore the opinion of my l believe, of the Governmcnt of the United are the co-sponsors of the ch'aft resolution which is now in front of you, that this of MI'. Graham's should be accepted. 9. This forms the central feature of tion which instructs the United Nations to continue his endeavours to obtain the parties to a plan for demilitarization his report to t.he Security Council within the coming into force of the resolution. 10. The draft before the Council is a one ancl one that l hope both parties accept without resel'vation. Vle are, agreed that ML Graham's prospects mission, in which we fervently wish him .and 1 8;m only. sorry that, being indisposed, here thls morl11ng, so that l am not \Vish him sue~ess personally - will best the avoidance now of any kngthy debate. felt that any detailed restatement of the representative's terms of reference w~s ~stillb~ ?perating. with;n the framework Coun~J1 s. resolutlOn o~ 30 March '!ast J:re \','\11 111 fact be trYlllg to Coil1plete, :.SIX weeks ~lowp\?posed, the ta~k?-ssigned 11. ~IY Governmcnt has felt it important that 1\11'. Craham and the parties should he left in no doubt of the Coullcil's approval of the manner in which he performed his task and of the broad lines of the programl1le for demilitarization which he laid oefore tbe parties. 12. There is one further question not direct1y touched upon in the c1raft resollltion to which l must refer. J'v[emhers will recall that the CounciJ's resolution of 30 March remindcd the governments and authorities concerncd of the principle cmboc1iecl in the various Security COllncil and United Nations Commission for IncJia and Pakistan resnll1tions on Kashmir, that the flllai disposition of the State should be made in accorc1ance with the will of the people expressed through the c1emocratic 1l1cthod of a [l'CC and impartial plebiscite conducted uncler the auspices of the United Nations. 13. The resolution went on ta point out that the convcning of a Constituent Assembly by Sheikh Abclullah's Governl11ent in Kaslunir ancl any action takcn by that Assel11bly to deter111ine the future shape of the State would not constitute a disposition of the state in accordance with the above principles. 14. Finally, the operative part of the resolution cal1ed on hoth padies ta refrain From any action likely to prejudice a just and peaceful settlement. 15. Now, since that resolution was adopted, a Constituent Assemhly !las been convened by Sheikh Abdullah's Government. Hs inaugnral session in Srinagar has just cndcd, ancl speakers, inc1uding Sheikh Abdullah, have rcferred to the question of the future of the State. As far as l can judge, the Constituent Assembly itself has not sought to prol1ounce on this issue of accession. 16. l shotild like, if l may, to make it clear that His IVlajesty's Governl11ent attaches great importance to th~,SC po;tions of the 39 M~r~h reso~ution dealing with Hm; subJect, and l th1l1k It IS pert111ent to recal1 the asstlfanccs given to this Council from time to time by the representatives of India that the Kashmir C01:s~it­ l1ent Assembly is not competent to take any declslOn on the question of accession; and that, though it cannot be prevented From expressing its opinion on this Slt?- jcet, this opinion wil.l ,110t bind. the Gov~rnment of Indla or prejudice the pOSitIOn of thls Council. 17. Those solenm assurances have been strel.lgthened by a recent statement made by Ml'. Nehru wInch l am sure 111Y col1eagues from Pakistan an.d members of the C01Jl1cil will we!come, l should ltke tp quote the "We have made it perfect1y cieal' in our statement in the Security Council that the Kashmir Constituent Assembly, 50 far as we are concerned, does not come in the way of a decision by the Security Council; that stands completely." 18. That is a quotation from what Mr. Nehru said. Ml'. Nehru "vent on to emphasize India's wish for the earliest possible plebiscite, and to state that India stood completely by her com111itments to the Security Council. These are very welcome statements, and l am sure they augur well for Ml'. Graham's further mission. 19. It is, therefore, with real confidence in the chances of NIl'. Graham's success, that l rec0111mend the adoption by the Security Council of the draft resolution which is now before it. 20. Ml'. GROSS (United States of America): Looking back at the last meeting of the Security Council on this subject of the India-Pakistan question [564th meeting], 1 think of it as a memorable one. It was mel110rable for the eloquence and wisdom with which the United Nations representative put his report before us. l, too, regret that he is not able to be here today with us; l unc1erstand he is confined ta a hospital room and l am sure that we all wish him a speedy recovery. 21. Our last meeting on this subject was memorable also, l think, because the presence of Ml'. Graham in this case is, in our view, in itself a fact of positive importance. The statement which Ml'. Graham made to the Council at that meeting demonstrates that he approached his task with an open minci and only one desire - to be of the utmost service to the Security Council, whose insistent wish it is to see this question settled promptly and with justice. Mr. Graham has stated his belief that both parties now realize the vital importance of a peaceful settlement of this issue. However, both his report [S/2375] and his statement to the Security Council show his awareness of the difficulties to be surmonnted before he will have succeeded in assisting the parties to effect the demilitarizatioll of the State of Jam111U and Kashmir in accordance with tl;eir lt1:dertakings.. ?uch a result would, as he put it, glve a lift to the spmts of people who are struggling to be free, and although he feels it is a possibility which is not to be excluded, at the sal11e time he does not undere5timate the difficulties of arriving at it. So 111uch is clear from Dr. Grahal11's report and statel11ent. 22. It is impossible to believe that either the Government of India or of Pakistan underestimates the apprehe~sions with .which .aU friends of the people of the /\51311 sub-çontment Ylew the protracted continw:mce of posl~lve faet 111 this case is that the leaders of India and ?akt?tan l;ave m~de jndicious and restrained statements III ~ISCUSS1l1g w~th the United Nations representative the ISSues on wInch agreement has not yet been reached. As a result of Mr. Graham's work dttrinO" the past three and a half 1110nths he has suggestecl tbat a new effol:t. sh?ul~l be macle to proceed with the plan of clel~11htanzatlOn and that a United Nations representattv.e - he modestly does not mention himself - should c0.nt1.nt1~ these efforts and report to the Security Council wlthm SIX weeks. In short he asks for a !ittle more time. 23. Ivly Government is hopeful that the other members of the Security Council and the parties will agree that we are fortunate ta have the skill and the faith of :VIr. GI:aham .and that we should 'pave the way for him ~o CI;l11tmue hls effor~s ~long the 11l1~s, which he suggests 1ll hls report, and thls IS what the j01l1t drait resolution rs12390] is designed to do - to give him the support, the encouragement and the time. My Government feeIs that the proposaIs for demilitarization as set out by Mr. Graham form a solld basis upon which the parties can reach an agreement. The draft resolution itself does not, of course, cleal with the details of the proposaIs themselves. It cloes endorse the principles underlying the proposaIs and the basis for a programme or, as Sir q-laclwyn Jebb put it a few moments aga, the broad Imes of the programme of demilitarization which Mr. Graham laid before the parties in their negotiations. 24. l t is a hopefttl fact that the parties, during the course of the discussions with ML Graham, have reaffirmed their determination not to resort to force and ta aclhere to peaceful procedures. They have also reaffirmecl their determination to observe the cease-fire agreement and their acceptance of the prineiple of an accession of the state by a free and impartial plebiscite t1nder the auspices of the United Nations. l think that these faets are c1ealt with properly and with approval in the first paragraph of the operative part of the draft resolution. The apprehensions of the world concerning the present situation on the sub-continent of Asia, to which l have referred, underline the decisive importance ot effecting demilitarization. Truly the gap betw.een agreement to demilitarize and the actual accol11ph~h­ ment of demilitarization is the long gap between promIse and performance, between success and failure. 25. The Security Council has repeatedly expressed concern also at the convening of a Constituent Assem?ly which might purport ta decide the question of accessIon by some means other t11an a free and impartial plebiscite unc1er the auspices of the United Nations. l confe~s that my Government is troubled at the press reports, If ~l11enc lle l)as' 26. \""Ie will aIl recall that the representative stated to the Secnrity Council on 1 March meeting] that, so far as the Government concerned, the Constituent Assembly prejudice the issues before the Security come in its way. He went on ta sayon meetingJ that any opinion which Asse11lbly expresses will not bind the India, nor prejucIice the position of 11lembers of the Security Council were these assurances repeated at our 29 May 1951, and 1 recall that it was meeting that 1 had the occasion to express of the United States Government regarding statement attributed to Sheikh Abdullah stituent Assembly wOltld purport to decision on the question of accession. ~gypt i vere th :oncern Jnited ;poken 28. T ment 16 Au feels ., parties At the issues is a siclerat' intern 27. These facts, therefore, lead me 1 have on behalf of 11lY Government observed ta the Security Council, and 29 May 1951, that sa far as we view attempt to decide the issue without the parties would leave only a constant irritant in the relations between these an irritant which might weIl prevent of peace and security in South Asia. 28. On the other hand, it is reassuring Minister Nehru has recently been quoted India stands by its cOJllmitments to the cil, and as feeling that the United tative has galle a long way towards draft resolution [5/2390] correctly always been the view of the Security accession of the State of Jammu and be .determined by a free and impartial the auspices of the United Nations. saying that, in our view, the Security have no choice but to regard any Constituent Assembly to settle this matter and ineffectual. 30. Unit activ fote. 1\. wrot by tl woul own, bein natio with \,.care 29. Since our last meeting, the peoples Pakistan have, together with the peoples the world, suffered a tragic event which world of a great leader and a wisé statesman. hist?ry .the martyrdon~ of an indivic1ual· reah:r.atlOn of the gravIty of problems people closer together. The President States, in a message to the Government saiç! ~hat the memory of the Liaquat Ali remalll a guide and inspiration to the people of Pakistan. . "Al! of us should now approach the large question of IncLo-Pak.istan relations in a new way and try to hush the VOlceS of controversy and dispute and also try to find some way or path consistent with our self-respect and honour to establish real peace between India ane! Pakistan." 31. In concluding, l should like to say that my Governmcnt accepts the sober opti1l1ism of the United ~ations representative. 'l'-le entire1y agree with his vlew that the settlement of this issue could have the 1l10S~ far-reaching results for the people of India and Pakistan as well as for the peoples of the world. In co-sponsoring with the United Kingdom the draft res?lution before us, we suggest to the Security Coullcil a sllllple and direct means of giving the United Nations representative a further opportunity to continue the practice of his art, because mediation is one of the ~reate::;t of the arts, and in my own country Ml'. Graham 15 known as one of its most distinguished practitioners. The Government of the United States therefore recoll1mends the draft resolution to the parties and to the Security Council. 32. Ml'. VON BALLUSECK (Netherlands): The very serious issue before us, which has endangered the relations between two great nations of the Asiatic subcontinent for almost four years, has not yet found a just and reasonable solution acceptable to the parties. As a result of this absence of agreement it has remained impossible for the people of the State of Jammu and Ka::;ll1nir as a whole to exercise their fundamental right of self-determinatioll, although this right is not contested by the parties. On the contrary, the right of self-determination for the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir has been clearly and formally recognized and accepted by all concerned. The lack of agreement therefore does not concern this right of self-determination. It concerns the ways and means and procedures to establish the conditions for a fair expression of the will of the people of the State of Jammu and Kaslunir who want ta make their choice free from any killd of fem· or intimidation. 33. \Vhen l spoke about this problem before the COl1ncil on 29 March 1951, l contended that the issue should, in the !ast analysis, be decided by the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir themselves, and not by the rulers heretofore placcd over them, and that no prearrangedpolitical organization in any part of the State concerned, and set up Ul1clei the auspices of authorities which had already made the:ir choice, should interfere with their complete freed0111 of choice. 34. For that reason my Government welcomed the paragraphs in the preamble of the resolution adopted by the SecurÎty Council on 30 March 1951 ta the effect that the convening of a Constituent Assembly for the put·pose of detennining "the future shape and affiliation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir" would not çonsti~ 35. We have now before us a draft resolution mittec1 by the United Kingdom and the United of America based on the recommendations of the of Mr. Frank P. Graham. It should be recalled Mr. Graham and his very capable assistants arrived the sub-continent on 30 June 1951. We know that and his staff have done their utmost to conform terms of reference which required him to report Security Council within three months of the date arrivaI on the sub-continent. 36. It was our firm hope that the United Nations representative for India and Pakistan would, at the of this term, be able to announce complete agreement between the parties, and it is a matter of deep to us that this has notbeen possible and that a further extension of time for negotiations seems to be inevitable. We know full well that the matter under consideration is not an easy one. Vve know that although the have agreec1 on the necessity for a fair plebiscite, even on the principles for demilitarization, which establish just conditions for such a plebiscite, there been, and still is, disagreel11ent as regards the pretation of these principles. This difference of pretation has made it impossible so far to formulate truce agreement, and in the absence of such a agreement, implementation of the demilitarization mains impossible. . 37. It is, in our opinion, one of the great merits Mr. Graham's report that he has analysed the question of c1emilitarization in a very clear and concise manner. He has put before us a nUl11ber of proposaIs which placed before the parties, and he has told us on points of these proposaIs these parties have agreec1 also where they continue to differ. Fortunately are numerous points where agreement was possible. l do not for a moment underestimate Importance of the fact that the parties were willing reaffinn their determination not ta resort to force not to make warlike statements. It is also of great value that both parties reaffinned their will to continue to observe the cease-fire agreement and to continue accept the principle that the question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashl11ir to India Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a true and impartial plebiscite under the auspices the United Nations. 38. In a11 these matters we found a reaffirmation good intentions, and we eamestly hope that this step towards producing an atmosphere where the tensions between the two nations may gradually lessened and ultimately disappear. But gooc1 intentions are not enol.lgh. The solution of the problem before mtt~t be based on deeds - peace through deeds. order ta el1.ablè the people of Jammu and Kashmir 39. Mr. Graham, in his report, has placed four points of difference on the proposais which submitted to the parties. These points are importance. They concern the actual implementation of the principles for demilitarization as an introduction to the plebiscite itself. Nevertheless it looks the United Nations representative for India stan has been able to narrow down the confiict four points. That in itself is a matter of considerable merit. We hope that we shall be justified in saying this constitutes an improvement compared with the situation was before Mr. Graham went to his mission. We trust that the parties will realise under the circumstances they bear an increased sibility for overcoming the obstacles that obstructing the way towards solution, now that seems to have become less wide. ['un projet d~ clu rapport de Royaume-Uni ut pas oublier collaborateut' 30 juin 191t' collaborateuTs' r se conforme; ~u Conseil ~e res la date ~e présentant ~~ Jakistau serail ;on l1.Jandat, la parlies. C'esl tOI1S gu'on n'a lI1gation de la 40. ML Graham himself, according to his report, come to the conclusion that, "although he underestimate the difficulties, the possibility of at a basis of agreement between the two governments is not excludec1". ~. NOlis savons las d'Une solu· ~s ont reconnu même aceeple i1itarisation el der d'une ma· et continue de ces principes. lermis jusqu'l l'absence d'lin !r en pratique 41. We fervent1y hope that the United Nations resentative for India and Pakistan will prove to in his estimate. On the basis of his confidence, Government is willing to agree to the recommendation of Mr. Graham, where he suggests to the Council that he should be instructed to continue tiations with the Governments of India and in order to obtain an agreement of the parties for effecting the demilitarization of the State and Kashmir. Such negotiations, continues Mr. in his report, should be carried out at the seat Security Council and instructions shonld be the United Nations representative to report Secmity Conncil within six weeks. l realize meeting the wishes of Mr. Graham, the Council for the moment deviate from paragraph 6 of resolution of 30 March 1951. eM, Granam il la fois très 1 démilitarisa· ~rtain nOlllore !S, et il nOlisa r lesguels le! lels leur avis de nombreux e ne veux pas lu fait que les ~rmination de lire de dlda· Illporiant, du ieut rlaffirmé rd de suspen· elon leguella mu et Cadle· Ir la méthode Ipartial orga· 42. In this draft resolution the parties to the in the event that their discussions with the Nations representative fail to resnlt in full agreement, are called upon to accept arbitration upon standing points of difference reported by the Nations representative. However, as long as a reasonable chance that fmther negotiations may in agreement, my Government is willing to opportunity open during the period of six suggested by Mr. Graham. • I/1S trouve la DUS espérons .à créer une ions existant cment s'alll· pas suffisanl du problème sur des actel 43. In the light of my foregoing remarks, my ment recognizes in a gener~l way the draft now before us. The adoptIOn of the draft wonld mean that the Council noted with approval basis for a programme of demilita:izatior~ Mr. Graham put forward to the Pnme Mmlsters 4~·. Mr. Grahum's own suggestion regarding further negotiations within a period of six weeks was that they should be cardec1 out at the seat of the Security Council. l do not find the reflection of this suggestion in the draft resolutiol1 [S/2390] now hefore us. l sincerely hope that this does not mean that the period of six weeks will have to be spent in part in activities involving a great cleal of travelling which would mean loss of valuable time, for once again my Government believes that we must indeed be conscious of the necessity ta save time. By saving time, we avoic1 c1angerous ris1cs which, if not cleterred, might compromise the work of peaceful settlement that we are trying to achieve. 45. Jn the sense of what l have already stated, my Government will support the joint draft resolut1on. 46. ML MUNIZ (Brazil): l had occasion in New York, when presicling over the Security Council, ta express the appreciation of the C0l1l1cil, ancl of the Brazilian cleleg'ation, for the excellent work clone by Mr. Graham in his mission of bringing the parties to agreement on the question of clemilitarization. The report. o~ Mr. Grah~m, as presen~ecl t.o the Security CouncJ1, IS the best eVldence of the s1l1centy ancl earnestness of his efforts ancl of his fitness for the delicate mission entrnsted to him. 47.. The Brazilian. de1egat~on will support the joint U11lted States-Ulllted Kmgdom draft resolution [S/~390], 'Y~ich in our opÏ1~ion is in keeping with prevlOUS declslons of the Secunty Council on the matter and represents a continuation of the efforts made by th~ United Nations towards the peaceful seulement of the India-Pakistan . (~ue~tlo~ and of the problems arising out of the de111lhtanzatlOn of Jammu and Kashmir. 48. The comprehe:1sive report submitted hy Mr. G:raham [5/2375] ~pves us a very clear picture of the d~fferences outstand1l1~ between -the two governments and s.ho.ws the necesslty of promoting and furthering negottatlOns between the Governmcnts of India and of Pakistan. 49. Although Mr. Graham was not in a position to report agreement between the parties, he received the assurance of both governments of their determination ta work for a peaceful settlement. This is why the 50. In voting for the draft resolution the Brazilian clelega~ion makes its.earnest appeal to t1;e Governments of. Indla an~ of Paktstan to do their very best to tl11s new effort at conciliation succeed. l am sure this appeal expresses the aspirations and the concern ail peoples, who see in the continuation of this conflict a source of grave danger to world peace. ~d ~~ Il, .. !~ ~e .:.- t 1~ 1:: .51. Mr. CHAUVEL (France) (translated French): The French delegation will be happy to for the draft resolution before the Council. The portance of the question of Kashmir cannot be ~.~ 1 c .~.. t " , ' ~~. ~stimatec1. Obviously very considerable illterests 111volvec1, but surely it is of overriding importance the c1ifftcu1ties connected with that question should solved. 52. The French Government has steadfastly supported past efforts for disposing of this heavy burden not only places a strain on the relations betweell c0l111tries that ought for many reasons to be closel}' together but which, as a consequence, impairs the political stability of a vast area of the 53. My Government congratulates the United Nations representative on the manner in which he has discharged his functions so far. It has most felicitously noted spirit of moderation which the parties involved and which is described in certain chapters of the (these are the chapters referred to a short while by the rcpresentative of the United States). It it as a good omen that Mr. Frank Graham shoulc1 he suggesting the renewal of his mission. Govcrnment makes a special point of encouraging NIr. Graham in his further efforts and is confident both governments concerned are sincerely anxions facilitate his task. 54. ML ALBORNOZ (Ecuador) (translated S panish): The delegation of Ecuador for the l'casons which induced it ta support the resolution this problem at the 539th meeting of the Security cil in Ncw York will vote in favour of the draft tian presented hy the United Kingdom and the States. 55. At the same time it expresses the hope that, the period indicated in paragraph 4 of the operative part of the clraft resolution, progress will be tmvards a greater degree of understanding between the parties sa as ta bring closer the achievement of the Security Council's !ntention that the proble.m finally be solvecl on the basls of a peaceful, democrattc, free and impartial expression of vie,ys by the concernecl, as is expressly restated 111 the fi~st .graph of the operative part of the draft resolutton. .~ !L t ;_1- ~ ~ ::-:- , ~"ir 1 " , tt~ :f~ r~ 1:0 . ;'. ~

We have already plained our views in connexiol~ with thi.s dispute staternent which l made ~o thls Conncll .on 29 of this year [538th meettngJ. If you WIll permIt 1 shaH· reacl a sentence from the statement l macle: 57. l now want to explain very briefiy the vote we about to cast on the draft resolutioll which is before Council now, thatis, document S/2390. 58. My delegatioll will vote in favour of the resolution tabled jointly by the delegations of the Um~ed States and the United Kingdom. However, in domg that, it is the intention of this delegation to reaffirm the provisions of the fifth paragraph of the resolution adopted by this Council on 30 March 1951. l shal1 this, if you will permit me, because we attach sorne importance to the provisions of this paragraph. fifth paragraph reads as fo110ws: "Affirming that the convening of a Constituent Assembly as recommended by the General Couneil of the (Ali Jammu and Kashmir National Conference', and any action that Assembly might attempt to to determine the future shape and affiliation of entire State or any part thereof would not constitute a" disposition of the State in accordance with above principle" that is to say, the principle of the resolution adopted on 30 March. S9. At the same time, l should like to express hope that the parties to the dispute will abide by dispositions of this paragraph in particular and of resolution in genera!.

Spealdng as the representative of CHINA, l should like ta stare that 111y delegation will vote in favom of the joint draft resolution [S/2390] which points out the way in which the Security Conneil, for the time heing at least, can be of service to India and to Pakistan. Mr. Graham eminently qualified, ta undertake this difficult task. 61. Reading his written report and hearing his report before the Council have convinced me Mr. G;raham's il~sigh~ into the problem! his impartiality and hls deep fnendlmess ta both Incha and Pakistan. l hop~ that both parties will give him hearty operatIOn. 62. A number of delegates have called our attention to the matter of the Constituent Assembly in Kashmir. "YVhen the w?rld Press first t;eported the possibility such a Constttu~nt Assembl~ tn Kashmir 111Y delegation went on record m the Secunty Council as believing suc1;t a. Constituent Assembly could not be allowed preJudIce, far less foreclose, the question of the accession of the State of Ja1l11l1U and Kashmir. We still hold 1 The above text is quoted from the mimeographed document S/PV.538. 63. :'.11'. (;IH)SS (Cnilt'd States uf Am<'rica): It has bcen 511g-~t·,..lt·11 lhal a rllln'l)' lt'dmil'a1 l't1ilnria! change should hl' lllillit' in paragl':lph 1 IIi thl' 0lwraliw part of the joint lirait rt·,..i'!UIÎOH l Sj'2.NO 1; llallll'!Y, that the descriptinll uf the lil!t~ tli Ill(' Slalt~ :-huuld he Încluded, so thal para~raph 1 \\'ouM h(~ I1Indilied h~' inserting. after the \\'01'<1 "Statt~" at the ('1111 !lf that paragraph, the won\:; "o! JaIIIIIIIl and Kashmir", 6+. TIlt' t'l'pn·s,t'Iltaliw ni Ill(' l'nitt'f! Kingdom and I, as spon';tlr:; Il! tht' drat'l n.. ~.nlutinn, agn~e that titis ted1l1it'al ch:mgt' Î:i I!l':,irallll', 65. Tht~ PH.ESIIJl·::--:T: Silln~ 1 havI' un nth(~r speaker 011 111\' li:,t r ,..hall HP\\" pron·t·1! III put tlw tlraft n'solution tu th'l~ '"litt', a \Il1 tilt' tl'xt whidl the Cnllndl will no\\' \'otl' lipoIl indllllt,s Lhi:; lt'dmÎl:a1 change which the two spllllsors wi"h ln mak(', ,,1 'l't/lct<'I1S wh'll /l'Y sllow tif Il1111ds. III (u,'ow': Hrazi\. ('hina. ECllador, France, 1\(~ther~ laml:;,' Turkt'Y, t ·nÎlI.'t1 Kingtlnlll uf (;reat Britain and 1'\nrtht'ru 1r(~lall\l, t'nill'd Stnl(~S nf AII\(~rica, Ytlgo- ~l,l\"ia, .-JyaiIlSI: :--:mll~. Ailsil/iuin!!: Indi,I, Ctlion nf Sln'iet Socinlist H.l'Imhlics. Tht' dru!1 n'.wll1litm ,('(lS m/oplni /Jj' 9 ''l!otcs 10 110111' ,\'illl .! lt!Jslt:'llliml$, TIt.. !lw'lill!! rI/St" 111 12.20 p.m, ~eskoslovellSkY Splsovatel N;\rodnr T'l'rda 'l, Prana 1. DENMARK - DANEMARK Einar Munksgaard, Nlrregade 6, K,benhavn. DOMINICAN REPUBLlC- REPUBLIQUE DOMINICAINE lIbreria Dominicana, Calie Merc.des No. 49, Apartado b5b, Ciudad Trujillo. ECUADOR ~ EQUATEUR MufioI Hermanos y Cla., Plaza dei Tt.1tro, Quito. EGYp'f - EGYPTE'· Librairie uLa Renafssanc[! d'Egyptl!," 9 SH. Adly Palha, Calro. EL SALVADOR- SALVADOR Manuel Navas y Ciao "La Ca~ dei llbro Baralo" la Avenida sur num. 37, San Salvador. ETHIOPIA - ETHIOPIE Ag,nce Ethiopienne de PublitltE, Bo~ e, Addis-Abeba. Un1fed Nation, publlcaflons can furfher Irom Ihe followlng LookreU.", GERMANY - ALLEMAGNE Buchhandluny EIVIert & M,urtr, Houpt·· str.sse, lOI, Berlin·~,hor.'bera. W. E. Snarb:-dl, Frank'nstras5C, 14, Kôln.Junker:;do,f. Alexander f1orn, Splc,oIg.sso, 'l, Wiesbaden. Orders and inquiri., Irom (ollntrl.s whore have not yet been ap~ointod m.y b. sent Cirtulaflon Sectio,. Unlt.d N,tions, N.w or S.I.. Sect;"n, Unit.d Notions Offic". Notion., Geneva, Swih.rland. Prinled in Canada - - - - - - ; : : : : - ; - - ; - : - - - : : - - : : - - - - - (or