Mr. Malik

Mr. Malik

Union of Soviet Socialist Repub- lics
6
Speeches
5
Meetings
Keywords in Speeches

Loading…

Meetings Attended

Speeches

The practice of the Security Council avd its rules of procedure show that the adoption of the agenda and the question of the order in whichthe items included by the Coundl in the agenda and therefore adopted by it for consideration, are not one and the same thing. They are two distinct questions. 2…

S/PV.603 Sept. 19, 1952

I had not intended to speak at this late hour but the United States represen- tative's explanation nf his vote compels me to make a few remarks on the matter. . 102. M. TSIANG (Chine) (traduit de l'anglais): Je pense que la discussion de procédure est maintenant terminée et que le Président e<;t su…

S/PV.5 Dec. 19, 1951

This is not a matter that can be discussed. We bave agreed to continue this meeting of the Security Council, and I gave notice in good time that I wou1d speak in Russian and that time \Vould be required for the two interpretations. l anl therefore not a little astonished at the way in which this mat…

S/PV.545 May 8, 1951

The USSR delegation wishes to give a brief explanation of the reasons for its vote. 119. The USSR delegation, believing as it does in peaceful settlement of disputes and conflicts between parties, could not but draw attention to the fact that in the resolution submitted to the Security Council ther…

S/PV.543 April 30, 1951

Those who have hacI this problem uncler such active consideration could- had they sa desirecI, of course - have not presentecI the Security Conncil only one nomination, that of Mr. Graham.

S/PV.543 April 30, 1951

The discussion on this question prompts a natural question which l should like to submit to the Council for reply or explanation - either by the President, or by the representatives of the United States or the United Kingdom. Why should the candidate nominated for this ornce - that is, the office of…