Now that the Security CŒl11cil has made its choice, l think that l am inter- pretÎ11g the feelings of representatives in expressing Dur best wishes for the successful carrying out of his mission to Mr. Frank P. Graham, Unitecl Nations Representative for India and Pakistan. His appoint- ment means a …
The appointment of Mr. Frank P. Graham as United Nations Represen- tative for Inc1ia anc1 Pakistan has been approved by the Council by 7 vDtes in favour, none against and 4 aqstentions. India i1' one of the countries which abstained, and I assume that it considers itsabstention as non-participation …
Is it the wish of any other member of the Council ta make any other nomination? Since 1 do not hear any other nominations, l shaH now proceed to the vote on the candidate placed befme us. In .favour: Brazil, China, Ecuaclor, France, Turkey, United King-dom of Great Britain and Northern heland, Unite…
l may observe that if the Soviet Union representative has another canc1idate in mincI whom he would like ta propose to the Council, l think that nothing would prevent him from doing so.
In reply ta the observations of the representative of the Soviet Union, l should like to point out that no other names of candidates have been received by me, although it goes without saying that nothing would have prevented any member of the Council from proposing names if he had wished to do sa. 1…
At its 539th meeting on 30 March 1951, the Council adopted by 8 votes to none, with 3 abstentions - one of the abstentions being in accordance with Article 27, paragraph 3 of the Charter - a resolution concerning the India-Pakistan question submitted by the representatives of the United King-
4. M.…
Before we come to the busi- ness before the Council l should like especially to welcome in our mic1st His Excel1ency the Brazilian Minister for Foreign Affairs who, as he is entitled to under mIe 13 of the provisional mles of procedure, is today representing Brazil in this Council Meeting. Tt is, in…
May l suggest ta the repre- sentative of Pakistan that he was going to explain the attitude of his governl11ent and not the presumable attitude of other governments with respect to that reso- lution? \!\Till the representative of Pakistan please con- fine himself to the explaining of the attitude of…
In view of what the repre- sentative of India has just said, the representative of Pakistan has requested me ta allow him to clarify his position in a few words.
At the end of onr preceding [539th] meeting, after the vote had been taken on the draft reso1ution contained in document S/2017/Rev.l, l informed the Council that the representative of Paki- stan had requested an opportunity to make a statement. We then decided to give him the opportunity to do so a…
The Council will recall how, at the beginning of our 533rd meeting on 1 March last, the President then assutning office, my distinguished colleague Sir Benegal N. Rau, deemed that he should not preside over the Council during the consideration of the India-Pakistan question. In accordance with rule …
l see no objection at all to
th~t procedure. As the Council agrees, the meeting is adJoumed until Monday morning 2 April at 10.30 a.m.
The meeting rosa at 1.10 p.m. ---- 2 Ibid., FoU'rth Year, Supplemellt for January 1949, p. 23.
60. Notre proposition est au fond fort simple. Tout ce que nous dem…
l have one more speaker on my list. The representative of Pakistan has requested an opportunity to make a statement after the vote has been taken. l understand that his statement will take about three-quarters of an hour to one hour. In view of the fact that it is now LlO p.m., l should like to hear…
Before calling upon the last speaker, 1 wish to remind the Secl1rity Council that it is my intention to put the revised joint ch'ah resolution now hefore us to the vote immediately after we have heard that speaker.
In view of the late hour and in view of the fact that l understand the represen- tative of Pakistan still has a considerable statement to make on this matter, l would suggest, if the represen- tàtive of Pakistan would be prepared to continue his statement at the Council's next meeting, that the Coun…
The representative of India has just now dec1ared that he does not desire ta preside over the Security Council during the consideration of this particular issue, namely the India-Paldstall ques- tion, which is now before us and with which the coun- try he represents is directly connected. Consequent…
We have now to resume our !discussion of the India-Pakistan question. This is a iHuestion with which Indiais directly connected, and 1
Président: Sir Benegal N. RAU (Inde),
Adoption de l'ordre du jour
Question Inde-Pakistan (suite)
Before proceeding to the busi- 'ness of the meeting, 1 should like, in accordance with a pleasant custom of this Council, to express our appre- 'ciation of the admirably efficient manner in which the representative of France, Mr. Lacoste, discharged his duties in the Chair. 1 only wish the calendar …
The Council has therefore sa decided. It is understood that it wil1meet again on Thursclay,l March, the ques- tion of the Presidency being lcft ta the discretion of the representative of Inclia.
The meeting rose at 5.45 p.m.
l'rintcd in Canada P~ice: 20. cents (D.S.) (or cqll1valent III other curr…
