1 was just about to make that sug- gestion from the Chair, and 1 do hope that the mem- bers of the Council will agree to it. It seems ta me that if we proceed in any way other than that of repeating the exact voting method that was used yesterday, we are likely ta get into even further procedural ta…
ln connexion with the complaint of armed invasion of Taiwan (Formosa), the members of the Council are now in possession of two new docu- ments, S/1822 and S/1823/Corr. 1. 1 think that the representative of Yugoslavia would like to have the f100r with regard to the first document, S/1822.
Mr. BEBLER…
If it would be the general desire of the Council to adjourn now, 1 would be quite prepared to do so, but we should then have to decide when we shall meet again. For some time the Secretariat has been urging the President to summon a private meeting of the Security Council to discuss the vexed questi…
It may not he tomorrow; that is a matter for discussion. Would the representative of Ecuador like to explain his vote now? 1 think it would he preferahle to have explanations of votes now.
Le PRÉSIDENT (traduit de l'anglais) : Le Conseil peut ne pas se réunir demain, la question n'a pas encore été …
It is for the Couneil to say whether or not we should adjourn.
Le PRÉSIDENT (traduit de l'anglais) : C'est au Conseil qu'il appartient de décider s'il y a lieu ou non de lever la séance.
Mr. QUEVEDO (Ecuador): 1 wished to explain my vote. but 1 can do that tomorrow.
M. QUEVEDO (Equateur) (traduit…
We shall initiate a debate on draft resolution S/1759, but 1 am not sure whether we should do so just now, unless the representative of China wants to say something very urgent.
Le PRÉSIDENT (traduit de l'anglais) : Nous aborde- rons le débat sur le projet de résolution S/1759, mais je ne crois pas…
\Vhether it is a question of common sense or not, we must now take a vote on the question of whcther or not we shall first deal with the Soviet Union draft resolution, document S/1759, on the repre- sentation of the People's Republic of China.
J:: PRÉSIDENT (traduit de l'anglais): Que ce soit ou no…
In that case, 1 rather think we must have a vote.
M. MALIK (Union des Républiques socialistes sovié- tiques) (traduit du russe) : Je voudrais apporter une précision. Il s'agit, non pas de l'ordre dans lequel les projets de résolution doivent être examinés, mais d'une simple question de bon sens; il…
In my humble oplOlOn, there is much force in what my Soviet Union colleague has said. l have no more speakers on my list. Would my colleagues now wish to demonstrate by the vote whether they wish to consider first document S/1759, that is to say, the Soviet Union draft resolution on the ques- tion o…
Sometimes the one touches upon the other, but l should like, if l can, ta keep this partic- ular debate to the question of procedure, with a view to reaching a decision whether or not we should take the last Soviet Union draft resolution first.
Mr. GROSS (United States of America): In view of the a…
As 1 understand it, the position is this: \Ve have three draft resolutions before us. One is document S/~745/Rev.1, of 31 August; that is the original draft resolution submitted by the Soviet Union, with a long title on this same subject. Then we have document S/1752, of 1 Septemher; that is a draft…
Since the ruling stands, 1 would tberefore ask the members at once to decide, in the light of what has already been said at such length, whether they wish item 4 to have precedence over item 3. That is the proposaI on which we shall now vote.
A 'llote was taken by show of !lands, as follows: In jœl…
Those members of the Council who wish to support tpe challenge to the President's ruling made by the Soviet Union representative will please raise their bands.
In fo:vour of over-ruling the President's ruling: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Yugoslavia.
No further vote was takell. The result …
As so often happens, when we dehate matters with the representative of the Soviet l'nion, a question which one might have thought was purely a question of arder or priority leads ta an im- passioned dellate on something which l, at least, would l'Onsidcr ta be the substance of the matter. That has h…
1 might say that the representative of the Soviet Union, like the representative of the United States, is entering to some extent upon the substance of the matter. We are not here considering the substance of either item 3 or item 4. We are not considering whether the representative of the Peiping G…
As 1 understand it, the representa- tive of the United States has suggested that we should now consider item 4 instead of item 3, partly because, in his opinion, item 4 is more urgent, and partiy because he thinks it is capable of being solved by a more im- mediate and simple deeision than item 3. I…
1 think it would be better, if 1 may say so, if the representative of the United States at this point were to confine himself to adducing arguments to show why, in his opinion, item 4 should be take..11 up before item 3 - in other words, to show, 1 suppose, why it is more urgent and why we 0:';'/::I…
Perhaps 1 might he aUowed to add, in my capadty as representative of the UNITED KINGDOM, that the responsibility for the continuation of this war with all its horrors rests with those who caused it. 1 now call on the representative of the United States on a point of order.
4. Discussion of the orde…
1 caU upon j}e representative of the Soviet Union on a point of order.
Mr. MALIK (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) (translated f~om Russian): The USSR delegation feels bound to state that it considers it illegal and un- just that the majority in the Security Council rejected the Soviet Union dr…
1 think 1 am in order, not having any further speakers on my list, to put to the vote the
~raft resolution submitted by the Soviet Union delega- tIon, the text of which is contained in document S/1679.
A vote was taken by show of hands, as follows: In favour: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
