← Votes

2209 (2015) SC

Security Council resolution 2209 (2015) [on use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic]

70
Session
14
Yes
0
No
1
Abstentions
Draft symbol S/2015/161
Adopted symbol 2209 (2015)
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Sponsors (37)
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document 2209 (2015) ↗

Vote Recorded VoteS/PV.7401 March 6, 2015

— Abstain (1)
✓ Yes (14)
Speeches following this vote (11) may include explanations of vote
Mr. Ramírez Carreño (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)
The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela abstained in the voting on resolution 2209 (2015) on chemical weapons in Syria because it believes that it prejudges the investigative process being conducted by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), linking the use of chlorine gas as a chemical weapon in the conflict taking place in that country. In that respect, we consider it nec…
Mr. Churkin (Russian Federation)
The Russian Federation voted in favour of resolution 2209 (2015), in connection with the reports of the fact-finding mission of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) regarding the use of chlorine as a chemical weapon in the Syrian Arab Republic (S/2015/138, annex). In that regard, we were guided by our principled position on the unacceptability of the use of chemical wea…
Mr. Wang Min (China)
China voted in favour of resolution 2209 (2015). China’s position on chemical weapons is clear and consistent. We resolutely oppose the use of chemical weapons by anyone in any circumstances, and support the concerted efforts of all relevant parties to fully implement the decisions and resolutions adopted by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the Security Council…
Ms. Power (United States of America)
We have adopted resolution 2209 (2015) today, a year and a half after the Council adopted a binding resolution in the wake of a horrific, gruesome chemical weapons attack that left more than 1,000 civilians and hundreds of children dead. Resolution 2118 (2013) required the Syrian regime to dismantle and destroy its chemical weapons programme under international supervision. The joint mission of t…
Mr. Hmoud (Jordan)
Jordan voted in favor of resolution 2209 (2015), introduced by the United States, related to the use of chemical weapons in Syria. The resolution prohibits the use of chemical weapons in Syria. We voted based on our conviction that the Security Council must deal with the issue in accordance with its prerogatives under the Charter of the United Nations The use of weapons of mass destruction in Syr…
The President
I shall now make a statement in my capacity as the representative of France. I would like to thank the United States delegation for having prepared resolution 2209 (2015), on the use of chlorine gas as a weapon of war in the conflict in Syria. France co-sponsored and voted in favor of this important resolution for several reasons. First of all, a year and a half after the adoption resolution 211…
Mr. Churkin (Russian Federation)
Unfortunately, the statement made by the the representative of the United States forces me to make rather detailed comments, since Ambassador Power cast the situation in such a light as to suggest that the onus is exclusively on the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic. Let me start with resolution 2118 (2013). She presented the situation as though that resolution were written in such a way as…
The President
The representative of the United States has asked for the floor to make a further statement.
Ms. Power (United States of America)
I will be extremely brief. I would just refer Council members and anybody watching this meeting to the reports that have been prepared by the experts of the fact-finding mission of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. I would not myself deign to weigh in at the level of detail as somebody who is a diplomat and not a chemical weapons expert. I would note, however, that the Co…
The President
The representative of the Russian Federation has asked for the floor to make a further statement.
Mr. Churkin (Russian Federation)
That logic is completely distorted. I would even put it another way. It is very strange that the United States stated that the use of chemical weapons by the Government of Syria would be a red line and that it would cause the Unites States to use force, and yet after the events of 21 August it did not do so. Therefore, the Al-Assad Government did not cross that red line. The President of the Unit…
Draft resolution text UNBench dataset (Liang et al.) ↗
The Security Council, Recalling the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, and the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (CWC), and the Council’s resolutions 1540 (2004) and 2118 (2013), Recalling that in resolution 2118 the Council decided that the Syrian Arab Republic shall not use, develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile or retain chemical weapons, or transfer, directly or indirectly, chemical weapons to other States or non‑State actors and that the Council underscored that no party in Syria should use, develop, produce, acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer chemical weapons, Recalling that the Syrian Arab Republic acceded to the CWC, noting that the use of any toxic chemical, such as chlorine, as a chemical weapon in the Syrian Arab Republic is a violation of resolution 2118, and further noting that any such use by the Syrian Arab Republic would constitute a violation of the CWC, Noting that chlorine was the chemical first used as a chemical weapon on a large scale in the Battle of Ypres in April 1915, Noting the first, second, and third reports from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Fact‑Finding Mission, which was mandated to establish the facts surrounding allegations of the use of toxic chemicals for hostile purposes in the Syrian Arab Republic, Noting the decision of the OPCW Executive Council of 4 February 2015 that, while stating diverse views on these reports, expressed serious concern regarding the findings of the Mission made with a high degree of confidence that chlorine has been used repeatedly and systematically as a weapon in the Syrian Arab Republic. Noting that this is the first ever documented instance of the use of toxic chemicals as weapons within the territory of a State Party to the CWC, Reaffirming that the use of chemical weapons constitutes a serious violation of international law and reiterating that those individuals responsible for any use of chemical weapons must be held accountable, 1. Condemns in the strongest terms any use of any toxic chemical, such as chlorine, as a weapon in the Syrian Arab Republic; 2. Expresses deep concern that toxic chemicals have been used as a weapon in the Syrian Arab Republic as concluded with a high degree of confidence by the OPCW Fact‑Finding Mission and notes that such use of toxic chemicals as a weapon would constitute a violation of resolution 2118 and of the CWC; 3. Recalls its decision that the Syrian Arab Republic shall not use, develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile or retain chemical weapons, or, transfer, directly or indirectly, chemical weapons to other States or non ‑State actors; 4. Reiterates that no party in Syria should use, develop, produce, acquire, stockpile, retain, or transfer chemical weapons; 5. Expresses support for the OPCW Executive Council decision of 4 February 2015 to continue the work of the OPCW Fact‑Finding Mission, in particular to study all available information relating to allegations of use of chemical weapons in Syria and welcomes the intention of the OPCW Director‑General to include further reports of the Mission as part of his monthly reports to the Security Council; 6. Stresses that those individuals responsible for any use of chemicals as weapons, including chlorine or any other toxic chemical, must be held accountable, and calls on all parties in the Syrian Arab Republic to extend their full cooperation to the OPCW Fact‑Finding Mission; 7. Recalls the decisions made by the Security Council in resolution 2118, and in this context decides in the event of future non‑compliance with resolution 2118 to impose measures under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter; 8. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
Cite this page

UN Project. “2209 (2015).” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/2209%20(2015)/. Accessed .