A/37/PV.121 General Assembly

Wednesday, April 20, 1983 — Session 37, Meeting 121 — New York — UN Document ↗

37.  Question of Cyprus: report of the Secretary-General (concluded) I. Mr. MAUDAVE (Mauritius) (interpretation from Prerch): I should like, first of all, to offer my sincere condolences, and those of my country, to the mission of the ~Mongolian People's Republic, which has been dealt a cruel blow by the sudden death of our colleague, Mr. Tsogtyn Narkhuu. 2. Mr. President, we are meeting once again under your diligent guidance to consider, with the serious- ness that is incumbent on this Assembly, the problem which is posed by Cyprus: for itself, in that it is being torn asunder, and for the international community as well. 3. Although separated by the vastness of the Indian Ocean and the continent of Africa, my country has affinities with Cyprus. Our respective populations are complex and diverse, and therefore enriched by the intermixture of ancestral traditions, languages and religions, an intermixture which can also generate conflicts from within. We have known the same type of colonization. As we are situated at strategic points ofthe globe, we are at various times coveted by some, courted by others and sometimes thwarted in our legitimate aspirations to territorial integrity and sover- eignty. We are islanders and hybrids and are thus accustomed to paradox. At this Assembly session, Cyprus has brought us into the very midst of a paradox, the paradox of a heritage of 7,000 years of civilization which is incapable ofdressing a wound only a few decades old. The wisdom of this Assembly ought to be applied to the search for a solution to this stalemate. 4. The various documents which have been submitted to us by the two communities of the island and by the Secretariat indicate- that there have been abrupt . and feverish negotiations whose outcome remains un- certain. One might therefore wonder in the end if the very style of these debates and the way in which they are conducted, a~ well as the eloquent and idealistic content of our resolutions, have not contributed to making the outcome more remote. But the fact remains that we are facing a dilemma which has been besetting us for years, -for so long that it could ultimately generate hissitude and cynicism. .5. Sectoral opportunism, too, has given one group, with an agricultural tradition, the opportunity to close its ranks and strengthen its grip on the land, whiie NEW YORK * Quoted in English by the speaker, A/37/PV.121 I~ can even represent the price to he paid in order that the value systems of each spiritual family, of each community, may be preserved and find within themselves the sources necessary for their renewal." Let us enlarge upon this idea. The Cypriots are, as I said, islanders and hybrids. "Hybrid." means that they are potentially capable ofcultural transc~ndence. While cultural "cohabitability" entails ri~ks, at the same time it opens the way to a broader and more fruitful humanism. This is perhaps evident here in the calm of this Hall, but in the world outside this fact is often ill perceived. 13. The desire to be balanced now obliges me to make three briefremarks. Fear being a pooradviser and * Quoted in English by the speaker. 22. We believe that we have a responsibility to contribute to the questfor peace in anypartofthe world and, aware of that role, we have asked to speak in this debate. 23. We wish to express our profound respect for the people of Cyprus and our gratitude to the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Cyprus, Mr. Nicos A. Rolandis, for his excellent statement [IJ6th meeting], in which he related the latest events that are occurring in his country, as well as the expressed will of the Gov~m- , ' ment which he SQ excellently represents to seek an answer to the problem by means of peaceful solutions and dialogue. 24. The intercommunal talks' have not made the expected progress; both communiti~s and the Special Representative of the Secretary-General agree with that a§sessment and about the gravity of the situation. One fundamental obstacle to the continuation of these talks is the occupation of40 per c~ntofthe territory of Cyprus by Turkish troops, an "Jccupation which has lasted since 1974. This constitutes a factor of force 25. It is necessary not only to provide a new impetus and to appeal to both communities so that, with renewed political wiil, they may make the necessary effort to pursue the talks in a constructive manner, but also to refer to the practical obstacles and once again to appeal to Turkey to withdraw its troops from the territory of Cyprus and desist from its attempts to change the demography ofCyprus. We must renew our support for the absolute right of Cyprqs to its sover- eignty and complete control over its territory and natural resources. 26. In this context and in short, we express our full support of the decisions adopted by the General Assembly, in particular resolution 3212 (XXIX), which was endorsed by the Security Council in its reso- lution 365 (1974), and we demand the immediate imple- mentation of those resolutions, which are the very essence and sole ~asis for the solution ofthis problem. We demand an end to the violation of the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Cyprus. For that purpose, the General Assembly and the Security Council must take appropriate measures to end the presence of all foreign troops and ensure the return of all refugees to their homes. We condemn any measure designed to bring about changes in the demographic structure of the island, since the situation created by that kind of measure must not be allowed to influence the solution of the problem of the people of·Cyprus. . 27. Likewise, we should like to state quite clearly that we support the decisions adopted by the Seventh Conference of Heads of State or Government of Non- Aligned Countries, held at New Delhi from 7 to 17 March 1983, as well as other earlier decisions taken on the problem of Cyprus. We firmly support the people and Government of Cyprus, their'indepen- dence, integrity, national unity and policy of non- alignment. 28. We also support the talks between the Cypriot communities, and particularly the 10~point agreement reached in Nicosia on 19 ¥ay 1979 between the Presi- dent of the Republic of Cyprus, Mr. Kyprianou, and the leader of the Turkish Cypriot community, Mr. Denkta~,l who, under the auspices of the Sec- retary-Geceral, at that time succeeded in arriving at viable agreements. In this connection, we shall con- tinue to support the moves which the Secretary-Gen- eral may make in this respect, in the hope that on this occasion maturity will win over intransigen~e. 29. We understand the difficulties that arise in any process ofpeaceful settlement, particularly whenforce is not eliminated from the context. Nicaragua, which is at present invaded and involved in an undeclared war waged against it by the United States,. is aware of the diffieulties of dialogue, which is the rational way of solving problems, but it believes, both in respect of its own situation and of the one we are dealing with, that despite the intransigence and mili- taristi{< policy 'of the adversaries, we must insist on the quest for a just and lasting peace, which can be ~ave deferred raising the issue again in the General

I wish to add the voice of my delegation to the expressions of con- dolence addressed to the delegation of Mongolia on its recent bereavement. 60. For many years, the Government ofBarbados has maintained a consistent policy with regard to the situ- ation in Cyprus. This policy remains unequivocal. Barbados remains committed to the continuation of support for a just settlement by way of negotiation, as called for by General Assembly resolution 3212 (XXIX), which provides the basisfor such a settlement. Barbados feels strongly that there should be total demilitarization of Cyprus and has noted the! limited progress made towards the resumption of the com- munal talks; we would support any efforts which wiil lead to the success of those talks. 61. My delegation finds nothing in draft resolution A/37!L.63 and Add.l inconsistent with this policy an~ does not share the pessimistic view that the literal contents of the draft resolution will seriously damage the fundamental intent of the resolut~on taken as a whole. My delegation especially welcomes para- graph 16, the intent of which is to underline the extremely important role of the Secretary-General in the effort to achieve a just and lasting solution of a problem which has demanded the patient good- will of the entire international community. My dele- gation will therefore vote in favour of the draft reso- lution.
Vote: A/RES/37/253 Recorded Vote
Show country votes
✓ Yes (103)
Denmark has con- sistently held the view that only direct negotiations between the parties concerned can lead to a settlement which guarantees the territorial integrity, indepen- dence and sovereignty-of the Republic of Cyprus. We therefore welcomed the resumption of the inter- . comm~mal talks on 9 August 1980. 63. After three years, it is high time for those talks to achieve substantial progress, and we have noted with great satisfaction that the Secretary-General is prepared to strengthen his personal involvementwithin his mission of good offices. We would like to assure the Secretary-General of our ful! support in this en- deavour. 64. . Denmark has for many years participated in UNFICYP and is willing to continue to do so. In this connection, I would, however, like to stress the need· for increased voluntary contributions in orderto rectify the serious financial situation confronting UNFICYP. 65. We recognize the goodwill with which the spon- sors and supporters of draft resolution A/37/L.63 and Add.! have made their proposals and express the hope that the Secretary-General's efforts will be supported with firm resolve. Howeveri. we do not feel that the draft resolution as a whole represents an appropriate balance, and Denmark will therefore abstain in the vote on the draft resolution. . 72. In conclusion, I once again reiterate the support of my delegation for the resolutions which hav~ been adopted by the· General Assembly and the Security C ,undl on this question to the extent that they have brought us closer to a' peaceful settlement of the dispute. 73. Mr..de PINIES (Spain) (interpretation from Spanish): The problem of Cyprus remains unresolved despite t~e efforts made by the Secretary-General and his Special Representative. 74. My Government has always maintained that the solution of this thorny proDlem should be sought in the . framework of the good offices of the Secretary- General and through the intercommunal talks. Hence, we have noted with some hope the fact that in his report [A!37/805 and Corr.l], the Secretary-General indicates that the talks have remained co-onerative and. constructive and that he intends to strengthen his personal inVOlvement within the framework of his mission of good offices. 76. We trust that the two communities will continue the talks under the auspices of the Secretary-General, in order to achieve a just and lasting solution of the problem as speedily as possible. Tt. Mr. KOROMA (Sierra Leone): Over the years my Government has expressed its serious concern about the problem of divided nations, but even more so in the case of Cyprus, which for almost nine years now has experienced de facto partition effected through an overwhelming military presence. Also, in this par- ticular case my delegation's concern derives not only from the fact that, with this partition, the Cypriot people as a whole are denied the possibility of realizing their fullest potential in unity and peace, but also because its prolongation adversely affects the fundamental prece;>ts ofihis Organization, nameiy, the non-use Qf force and the inadmissibility of the acqui- sition of territory by force or through occupation. Furthermore, the prolongation of this dispute poses a danger to international peace and security, at least in the Mediterranean region. 78. My delegation, therefore, interprets draft reso- lution A/37/L.63 and Add.l as a further call by the international community for the restoration and observance of the fundamental precepts ofthe Charter of the United Nations and for the preservation of peace in that area. 8G• . Nevertheless, my delegatioil would have pre- ferred the draft resolution to maintain the formulation in paragraph 5 of resolution 34/30 concerning foreign troops, believing, as we do, that the critical emphasis of the present text may prove a limiting factor as regards the necessary climate of negotiation. We do not find operative paragraph 15 clear, as it does not precisely define the respective areas of competence of the Security Council and the General Assembly. Similarly, with regard to the reference to an inter- national conference on Cyprus, which is included in the seventh preambulaa paragraph of the draft reso- lution and was included in the fourth preambular paragraph of resolution 34/30, we would have wished to see this completely deleted. The convening of such a conference might lead to a radicalization of the positions of the parties concerned. 87. Mr. BARBOSA de MEDINA (Portugal) (inter- pretation from French): May I first associate myself with the condolences expressed to the delegation of Mongolia. 79. My delegation will, therefore, support the call for the speedy withdrawal offoreign armed forces from the Republic of Cyprus and its total demilitarization. In order to obviate the fears of the minority community, the Uoited Nations should guarantee their protection through the deployment of its forces on the island. This, we believe, will provide free and unfettered negotiations in the intercommunal talks. 80. Draft resolution A/37/L.63 and Add.l, in our view sets out the principles and framework within which this problem could be resolved in the interest of both Cypriot communities, and, if implemented, will not only preserve the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence and non-aligned status of Cyprus, which the representatives ofboth communities espouse, but also guarantee the interests of the minority community as set out in the high-level agree- ments of 12 February 19772 and 19 May 19791• 88. During the debate on the question of Cyprus at the thirty-fourth session, the delegation of Portugal had the opportunity to define the general framework ofprinciples upon which, in its view, any constructive effort must. be based if a sqlution to the Cyprus ques- tion was to be achieved [73rd meeting]. Draft reso- lution A/37/L.63 and Add.l contains elements which could become part of such a framework. 81. Finally, we view the draft resplution as a magis- .terial pronouncement by the General Assembly, one of the organs charged with the maintenance of inter- national peace and security, on the settlement of this matter peacefully and without any further delay. We appeal to all the parties concerned to harken to - that call both in the interest of the Cypriot people 89. The draft resolution also recalls the fundamental principles of international relations and the essential 90. My delegation would, however, Hke to emphasize its ties of friendship with all the parties concerned, and we appeal to those who, as allies, have so many common interests to exert every effort in the pursuit of dialogue in order to ensure a peaceful solution which win meet the interests of the na!ional communitie§ involved.
Turkey will vote against draft resolution A/37/L.63 and Add.l because the Turkish Cypriot community feels that this text is unacceptable and cannot be taken into consideration in the intercom- fuunal negotiations and in the relations between the two communities. Our reasons are the following. 92. First, Turkey can only support the reaffirmation of the principle of the inadmissibility of acquisition and occupation of territory by force. The forces in Cyprus are forces not ofoccupation but of protection. In order to describe properly the origin ofthe question of Cyprus, it is necessary to reaffirm, rather, the principles of supremacy of the rule of law, the in- violability ofinternational treaties and the right of self- defence. The fourth and eighth preambular paragraphs and paragraphs 1, 8, 12 and 14 are completely out of place in this text. 93. Secondly, paragraph 7 is drafted in such a way as to offer to the Greek Cypriot community and Greece opportunities which would probably be utilized by them to sabotage the intercommunal negotiations and attempt uselessly to prolong them by delaying tactics, since this text could be interpreted by the Greek Cypriot administration and by Greece as making the withdrawal ofTurkish troops a pre-conriid"n either of the continuance of negotiations or of progress in those negotiations. 94. Thirdly, the second, third, sixth and eleventh preambular paragraphs and paragraphs 5, 6 and 10 concern the bases ofa solution ofthe Cyprus question. It should be noted that Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot community accept as the basis of a solution only those provisions of United Nations resolutions which they have already expressly accepted. The provisions on which Turkey has expressed reser- vations at the request of the Turkish Cypriot com- munity-particularly those in General Assembly reso- lution 3212 (XXIX)-are therefore not recognized by the Turkish Cypriot community or Turkey to be relevant texts which should be taken into consideration in the search for a negotiated solution. 95. The turk~shCypriot community and Turkey fully support the high-level agreements concluded between the two communities in 19772 and 19791• At the same time, the Turkish Cypriot community and Turkey greatly regret that the opening statement of the Secretary-General of 9 August 198()3 and the "evalua- tion" paper were not ~entioned in the draft reso- lution~ on the total demilitarization of the island, this question has already been the subject of a specific provision of the high-level agr~ement of 1979 and the language of this paragraph is in no way in conformity with that provision of the agreement. 98. Sixthly, the tenth preambular paragraph is totally without basis. 99. Seventhly, the ninth preambular paragraph and paragraph 9 refer to Uthe lack of progress in the intercommunal talks". This categorical assertion con- tradicts the evaluations made by the Secretary- General which appear in his official reports. 100. Eighthly, the sole basis of the mission of good offices of the Secretary-General is a provision of a Security Council resolution, not the resolutions of the General Ass~mbly. Paragraph 13 contains, therefore, statem~fi~3 which in no way correspond to the legal realities. The Turkish Cypriot community and Turkey have always supported the good offices mission of the Secretary-General andthe intercommunal negotiations under his auspices. Paragraph 16, however, is likely to prejudice the fulfilment of that mission. The very wording of this paragraph-"intention... to pursue a renewed personal involvement"-is not in accord- ance with the Secretary-General's report, in which he simply says "It is my intention to strengthen' my . personal involvement" [A/37/805 and Corr./ J para. 5]. Thus, the reference in this paragraph tn the Secretary- General's report only increases the ambiguity of the text. This paragraph is unfortunately likely to lead to interpretations based on bad faith and designed to make it possible to avoid a thorough discussion ofthe "evaluation" paper by recourse to new delaying tactics at the negotiating table and fallacious arguments to the effect that the only basis for these negotiations should be a future initiative of the Secretary-General. The Turkish Cypriot community and Turkey do not doubt the good' intentions of the Secretary-General, but we feel that this paragraph will only encourage the Greek Cypriot side to avoid a thorough discus- sion of the "evaluation" paper, as the statement ofthe representative of the Greek Cypriot community in the Special Political Committee on 10 May [50th meeting] proved that they wish to do. 101. Ninthly, the seventh preambular paragraph is entirely out of place. 102. Tenthly, it is contrary to international law to call upon States to support the Greek Cypriot admin- istration, which has usurped the title "Government of Cyprus", and to allow it to exercise sovereign rights over the territory administered by the Turkish Cypriot community. Such an initiative can only re~ult in the annihilation of the Turkish Cypriot community. 103. Eleventhly, paragraph 15 contains a totally in- opportune recommendation to the Security Council, 109. The objective of my Government has always been sovereignty, independence and freedom. This has been, and will be, our target, our objective and the unswerving ori~ntation ofthe aspirations ofourpeople. 110. Two resolutions have been adopted recently by the House of Representatives of Cyprus on this par- ticular point, and I should like to read to this As- sembly a pertinent paragraph: "The House declares that the immutable objective of the struggle of the people of Cyprus is full independence and. sovereignty, the unity of the State, the territorial integrity and non-alignment of the Republic of Cyprus, the safeguarding of the security ofthe Republic ofCyprus and all its people, and the protection of the inalienable human rights of all the citizens of the Republic. It rejects any solution resulting in the abolition of the Republic of Cyprus and the territorial integrity of' Cyprus, and precludes any solution resulting in any way in .the annexation of the whole or part of the territory of the Republic of Cyprus by any other State, the manifest or disguised partition of the Republic of 113. Although, probably, by its vote today the As- sembly will not be able to· undo the injustice already done to Cyprus-because, as we all know, this Organ- ization does not have the mechanism for implementing its decisions-at least by voting for Cyprus and justice the Assembly will show once more that it stands firm by the beliefs and principles of this Organization, that it adheres to those tenets for which the United Nations was established in the aftermath of the Second World War and that it is prepared to go on voicing and upholding those principles until the time comes when their universal application becomes possible.
The Assembly will now proceed to take a decision on draft resolution A/37/ L.63 and Add.l. A separate vote has been requested on paragraphs 7 and 15. As I hear no objection, I take it there is no objection to that procedure. I shall put paragraph 7 to the vote first. A recorded vote has been requested. In !cn'our: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Benin, Bhutan, Boli- via, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burma, Burundi, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Cape Verde, Guine~, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, India, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Kenya, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lesothd, .Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Mada- gascar,: Mali, 'Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Mozambique, .Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, 'Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Republic of Cameroon, Upper Volta, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Against: Bangladesh, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey. Abstaining: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ice- land, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Luxembourg, Malawi, . Morocco, Netherlands, Niger, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Portugal, Samoa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and North- ern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay. Paragraph 7 was adopted by 89 votes to ~. with 27 abstentions.
A recorded l'ote was taken.
The Assembly will now vote on paragraph 15. A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The Romanian delegation is saddened course which might be prejudicial to, or influence, by the untimely death ofthe Permanent Representative negotiations, and we therefore believe that we must . of Mongolia, Mr. Narkhuu, and wishes to expreoSs it~ support the Secretary-General in his efforts and give heartfelt and profound condolences to our colle&,:l:ues him sufficient time to find a compromise formula and comrades of the Permanent M:jsion of Mongolia. which will be acceptable to bo!h communities. 127. The Romanian delegation voted in favour ofthe 13S. This is why we abstained in the vote on the draft - draft resolution submitted by seven non-aligned coun- resolution. peacefu~ settlement of this conflict should be achieved through negotiation and intercommunal talks. Our sup- port of that draft resolution has its roots in our con- viction that.it contains positive elements which could lead to a peaceful, lasting and just settlement of the question of Cyprus. 147. Our support of the draft resolution is based on our position ofprinciple and on the support we always give to an the decisions of the United Nations to. settle this problem. It is based also on the fact that the draft resolution contains positive and important ele- ments, in particular its affirmation ofthe need to find a peaceful and comprehensive settlement, through talks .and meetings between the two communities. The resolution reaffirms the basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations regarding the rights, duties and obligations of Member States and relations between them. Above all, my delegation supports the efforts of .the Secretary-General in this context. 148. My delegation believes, however, that para- .graphs 7 and 15 of the draft resolution are drafted in a manner that is not fully in keeping witl:t·the aspira- tions of the two communities regarding the solution of the problem and do not help provide the impetus needed for the resolution of this important issue. That is why we think that the international community should lay stress on the points of agreement between the two communities rather than on the points which . divide them'. We must bear in mind the views not of one community only but of both communities if a solution of this problem,is to be found. 149. My delegation wishes to pay tribute to the Secretary-General for the initiatives he intends to undertake in continuance of his commendable efforts to bring about the settlement of the question of Cyprus. We believe that dialogue and negotiations between the two communities under the auspices ofthe Secretary-General will enable him to highlight the positive elements in the draft resolution, thus leading . to a positive solution of the problem. ~rely thank all the delegations that have expressed, both in their statements and personally, their profnund condolences on the oct;asion of the untimely death of the Permanent Representative of the Mongolian People's Republic to the United Nations, Mr. Narkhuu. I shall transmit those condolences to my Government and to the family of the deceased.
Suspension ofthe thirty-seventh session
I should like to thank all representatives for their co-operation in the work of the resumed thirty-seventh session and to thank also the members of the Secretariat. 160. In accordance with Assembly decision 37/452 of 21 December 1982, items 38 and 141 remain on the agenda of the thirty-seventh session of the General Assembly) which I now declare suspended. The meeting rose at /2.55 p.m. NOTES 2 Ibid., Thirty-second Year, Supplement for April, May and June 1977, document S/12323, para. 5. 3 Ibid., Thirty-fifth Year, Supplement fo!" July, August and Sep- tember,I980, document S/14100, annex. 4 A/38/132, annex, appendix. 11. S The delegations of Antigua and Barbuda and of the United Republic ofTanzaniasubsequently informed the Secretariatthat they had intended to vote in favour of the draft resolution.