A/46/PV.75 General Assembly

Friday, Jan. 3, 1992 — Session 46, Meeting 75 — New York — UN Document ↗ OCR ✓ 3 unattributed speechs
This meeting at a glance
4
Speeches
1
Country
8
Resolutions
Resolutions: 31/127, 40/230, 32/132, A/RES/46/117, A/RES/46/130, A/RES/46/134, A/RES/46/135, A/RES/46/137
Topics
Arab political groupings UN resolutions and decisions General statements and positions Human rights and rule of law International criminal justice Global economic relations

31m.  THE SITUATION IN CENTRAL AMERICA: THREATS TO INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SBCURITY MD PEACE INITIATIVES: (a) R&PORTS OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL (A/46/656 and Corr.1, A/46/713) (b) DRAFT R&SOLUTION (A1461L.301Rev.2) (c) REPORT OF THE FIFTH COMMIT-TEE (A/46/772) The PR- (interpretation from Arabic): May I remind representatives that the debate on agenda item 31 was concluded at the 64th plenary meeting, on 5 December. At that meeting draft resolution A1461L.30 and Corr.1 was introduced. Members will also recall that action on the draft resolution was postponed in order to give the Fifth Committee time to review the programme budget implications of the draft resolution. The Asswmbly now has before Jt draft resolution A/~b/L.30/Rev.Z. Tha report of the ?ifth Cornlttoo on the propramw budget lnpllcatloor of the draft raaolutioo is contained in documoot A/46/772. We ehsll now take a docirioo oo draft resolution W46/L.30/Pev.2. May I take it that tho Aamembly docidsa to adopt draft remolution A/4b/L.30/POV.21 t r-m2 wan s (resolution 461109). m (interpretation from Arabic): We have coocludad this stsge of our consideration of sgeods item 31. AGKNDA ITEMS 98 and 12 (m) HUUAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS: (a) REPORT OI THE THIRD CWMITTF,E (PARTS X and If) (A/46/721 and Add.1) (b) AMZNDMZNT (A1461L.52) (cl REPORTS OF TIM FI?TH COMXITTGE (A/46/778, A/46/764) RZPORT OF THE ECOROUXC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL: REPORT OF THE THIRD COMMITTEE (A/46/717 sod Add.1) s (interpretation from Arabic): I call on the Rapporteur of the Third Conwnittee, Ha. Rosemary Semafumu of Uganda, to present the reports of the Third Committee. Ilr, (Uganda), Rapporteur of the Third Omittoo: I have tlm honour to lotroduco the followlag roportc, of the Third Comittoo on the item. allocated to it by tho General Amrombly for conridoration: under item 96, l ntitlod WUMU righta quertionm”, the Third Corrittoo tee-ndd, in bocmnt A/46/721, the adoption of 27 draft rorolutionr, which are 9ivoa in parrqraph 102 of the report, and the adoption of tvo draft decirioar, which are given in paragraph 103 of the rqaort. In connection with draft rerolution XIV, I rhould like to draw the attention of the Ammembly to the fact that, whore it im stated in tho report that tba Committee adopted the draft resolution without a vote (A/46/721, para. 561, a footuoto nhould be inserted aftor the words “without a vow”, reading: “Pollowiag the adoption of the draft resolution, a8 orally reviood, the roproreotativo of the United Staler of America stated that ho had not participated in the vote oo the draft rerolutioo.” Under the mame item, the Third Comitter recmods, in document A/46/121/Add.l, the ndoption of two draft resolution8 set forth in paragraph 26 of the report, and the adoption of a draft decirion set forth in paragraph 29 of the report. Uoder item 12. entitled “Report of the Ecooomic and Social Council”, the Third Committee recommends, in document A/46/717, the adoption of a draft resolution set forth in paragraph 12 of the report and of two draft decisions set forth in paragraph 13 of the report. Under the I~JW item, the Third Ccumittee recommends, in document A/46/717/Add.l, the adoption of a draft resolution set forth in paragraph 7 of the report, w (iatorprotatioo from Arabic): I should like to inform rwmbmrr that the roprorontstivo of Iraq has expressed a desire to make a statement in connection with the report (A/46/721 and Add.11 of the Third Comttteo ou agenda item 98. Bearinq in mind rule 66 of the rules of procedure, may I take it that the General Assembly agrsor to dircusr that report? It was 80 u , Hr. AL-AI?QM,L (Iraq): With regard to dxument A/46/721, the reprerontative of Ireq in the Third Committoe expressed our views concerning the text of the draft resolution under consideration. The sole point that I want to make now ia that the noble cause of human rights is being used. not to promote or improve human rights in Irsq, but is rather being abused to deprive the Iraqi people of the most basic human rights, notably the right to life, without which there could be no humans to speak about their riqhta. I have no doubt that aom of the sponsors of this draft resolution are genuinely interested in promoting the cause of human rights in Iraq as elsewhere. Nevertheless, the draft resolution is going to aerve the well-orchestrated campaign to prolong, indeed to tighten and perpetuate, economic and financial sanctions against the Iraqi people. What sense does the draft resolution make when, as recently as October 1991, the international study team, cornposed of around 70 specialists from this country and many other European couotr ies, reported that “unless Iraq quickly obtains food, medicine and other supplies, millions of Iraqis will continue to experience maloutritioo and disease. Children by the tens of thocAanda will remain in jeopardy; thousands will die.” The sanctions have been maintained, indeed tightened, deapits the fulfilment of all the conditions specified in paragraph 22 of Security Council resolution 687 (1991) for the termination of the eanctions. By illegally maintaining the economic sanctions against Iraq, some countries members of the Security Council have managed to make resolution 667 (1991) nothing less than a death sentence against every Iraqi man and woman who needs dialysis but cannot get it, against every Iraqi man and woman who is diabetic but cannot get insulin, and against every Iraqi man and woman who needs chemotherapy but cannot get it. owing to the sanctions. Indeed, many categories of Iraqi patients face irmninent death as the only reality awaiting them day in and day out. owing to the sanctions. As a matter of fact, perhaps for the first time in modern history, babies are being killed while they are still in the worrbs of their mothers when they need Caesarean operations. So, instead of beinq born alive, they 90 together with their mother to the graveyards. In addition to those facing inuninent death in Iraq, it has been estimated by the same international study team that the mortality rate of children under five years of age is now 380 per cent greater than before the onset of the Gulf crisis. This estimate was made after a thorough countrywide survey of 9,034 households. The study teams, like previo.Js international and humanitarian teams, concluded that the rise in mortality among infants and children under five years of age is likely due to a complex interaction of iactors, including the acute shortaqe of food and essential medicine throughout Iraq. Lack of clean drinking water and sanitation systems has greatly increased such water-borne disea: 5 as cholera, typhoid, dysentery and gastroent-eritis. The figure@ and obmorvationm jumt referred to make any talk about the condition of human rightm in Iraq, while mupporting or rofuring to lift the l anctioom agalamt Iraq, nothing lemm than relf-contradiction, If not l omethin9 wormer which I refrain from dercribing. (Mr.) l?othing cam iertoro to the Iraqi people their right to life. a life free fram disease and hunger. ualesa.it be the liftiag of all the inhuman sanctiona so that the infrastructure of the Iraqi economy can be totally reconstructed, Iraqi society restored aad the environmental deterioration ameliorated. Eence, those who truly care for the humaa rights of the Iraqi people should urgently denand total abolition of the inhuman. illegal and brutal sanctions end the lifting of the land, air and sea siege. I have enough faith in human civility and decency to believe that ao country oa Earth uould like to bee genocide beiag committed against the Iragi people. but genocide is inevitable so long as sanctions are continued: a slow but ayatmatic process of genocide in Iraq will then certainly ensue. I hope that this aote vi11 explain to the sponsors of this draft resolution the true reality they have to face and that their consciences will remind them that they should really protect first and foremost the Iraqi people's right to life. m PRESIDENT (interpretation from Arabic): Statements will now be limited to eaplanationr of votes. The poaitioas of delegatioas regarding the various recomendationa of the Third Connnittee have been made clear in the Comnittee and are reflected in the relevant official records. Way I remind madera that under paragraph 7 of decision 34/401, the Assembly agreed tbat: "When the same draft resolution is considered in a Main Committee and in plenary meeting, a delegation should, as far as possible, explaia its vote only once. i.e., either in the Committee or in plenary meeting unless that delegation's vote is different from its vote in the Coamittee." Way I remind deleqations that. also in accordance with General Assemtly decision 34/401. explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by deleqatious from their seats. Before we begin to take action on the recomnendatioos contained in the reports of the Third toumittee. I should like to advise representatives that, unless delegations have already notified the Secretariat to the contrary, we are qoinq to proceed with the voting in the same manner as was done in the Third Committee. This means that where recorded votes were taken, we shall do the same. I should also hope that we may proceed to adopt witlxout a vote those recozznendetione that were adopted without a vote ia the Third Committee. The Assembly will now consider parts I and II of the report (A/46/721 and Add.1) of the Third Committee on agenda item 98. entitled "Human rights questions". Mr. VAN DEB HRIJDEN (Netherlands): I should like to make a very slight amendment to draft decision I contained in document A/46/721, entitled "Status of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel. Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment". (Af461721. uara. 103) In the penultimate line, the words “forty-seventh session" should replace the words "forty-eighth session". The whole phrase should therefore read: "... requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its forty-seventh session OD the Status of the Convention". This slight amendnent brings the draft decision into line with the report of the Working Group on rationalization of the work of the Third Committee and its proqrsmme of work. The PRESIDEM (interpretation from Arabic): We have taken note of the amendment proposed by the representative of the Netherlands. TM Aarmmbly bar beforo it 27 draft resolution8 recommended by tba Third Cmittoo in p8rrqraph 102 of part I of its report (A/46/721), two draft decieionr rocomendod by the Third Connittoe in paragraph 103 of the mame document, am well a8 two draft resolutions recommended by the Third Corrrittm in paregraph 28 of psrt II of the report (A/46/721/hdd.l) and a draft decirion recoaundad by tkm Third Comittee in paragraph 29 of the sama part. In connection with draft resolution XX contained in paragraph 102 of psrt I of the report, the Assembly also haa before it an amendment rubmittod by Cuba (11461L.52). I rhall put the reconvnendations of the Third Cotmnittee contained in psrtr I and II of its report (A/46/721 sad Add.11 to the General Assembly one by one. After all the decisions have been taken, representatives will again have an opportunity to explain their vote. I ahall now call on those delegations that wish to explain their votes or positions before the voting. m. lQ)GCliAlQ (Haiti) (interpretation from Pr,och): I have the honour of explaining my delegation’s vote on draft resolution I in document A/46/72l/Add.l, entitled “Enhancing the effectiveness of the principle of periodic and genuine elections”. On 16 December 1990, after 29 years of hereditary dictatorship and five years of political upheaval, the Republic of Haiti thought it had reached the turning-point which would have made it the most concrete example of this draft resolution. The work carried out with the international community, and, in particular, the Observer Group for the Verification of the Elections in Haiti (ONWEH), could have served as a basis in the global programme of the new world order under the auspices of the United Nations. Haiti - a small country, poor among tbw poor, wmwrging from a backward-looking dictatorship , controlled by a small group that own all of the rwsourcws to the dwtrimwnt of a population that lives in abject poverty, overwhelmed by internal conflicts of all kinds - bad just elected L;y a majority of 70 ,wr cwnt a Presidwnt whose urgwat mandate was to organise a democratic society based upon political participation, social and economic justice and rwspwct for fundamental freedoms. This was the first manifestation of tbw political will of the Haitian people to determine their own future after 200 years of independence. Just onw year ago, on 16 December 1990, the United Nations announced to the world the remarkable succwss of the Haitian electoral process. The people's satisfaction was justified by the hops that was born of the succwss of that endeavour. On 25 September 1991. to the applause of the General Assembly, President Jean-Bertrand Aristidw came here to thank the international community for what it had done to help tbw Haitian people win this challenge. Unfortunately, the minority that had alvays taken advantage of an iniquitous system did not hwsitatw to resort to the force of arms in order to undo vhat had been done through the unprecedented cooperation bwtvwwn the Haitian people and the international community. On 29 September 1991, a bloody military EOUD d'itat forced President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to leave Haiti for the brother country of . Pnezuwla. Since then, thousands of my compatriots tave been killed by the deadly bullets of a repression that has created U:,.XE .3.;znted despair among Haitian families. We cannot even count the nuinber of people who have been displaced, vho have fled their homes, as a result of this institutionalized repression orchestrated by those who carried out the military -. Thousands of refugoos, floelog th8 ho11 that had beon created by the roldierr and their civilian alliom, braved the vicieeitudee of the Caribbean and the Atlantic in search of what they hoped would be more merciful l kiom. More than 10 thouraad Ha!.tian rr fugeom who survived are DOW troubling the sleep of authorities in various partr of the hericam. According to the report of the Intor-American Commismion on Hwnsn Rights, I ’ since the rpyp d w , more than 1,500 people have boon killed, and just yesterday, 16 December 1991, the Haitian army wa8 still ruthlessly sowing terror throughout the country. One deputy raa killed io hir home in the northern part of the country by section chiefs. The house of another deputy was destroyed as were about 60 other houses in the same vicinity. All of the parliamentariam who signed the letter calling on President Aristide to choose a Prime! Minister as soon as possible in order to thwart military coercion have had to 90 into hiding because of the panic and the terror that has been orchestrated by those who carried out the u. The independent press has had to cease publication. The State meuia are now in the pay of those who carried out the T(UP and they ace disseminating a list of names and addresses of people and people’s organisations that the army is going to hunt down, and they are also calling for the return of the Tontons-Macoutes movement. As a background to this institutionalized terror, we have the dead, the wounded and massive illegal arrests. , ’ Two months after the EOUD d et& , in an attempt to thwart the manoeuvres of the military and its civilian allies, President Aristide, concerned over the subhuman conditions in which the Haitian people find themselves, is trying to negotiate, under the auspices of the Organisation of American States, with a Patliaaant that carrier on ite deliboratione under the boots of the military arrd with ocbor groator or loeeor opportunirts. In order to Loop feitb with tbo domocrat!c idoal assigned by the people of Haiti tn my Government, we muIt, boforo we participate in thie vote, state clearly our poeition on the organisation of the l loctione and of the concept of democrecy And egonda itom 98 (b). In the colloctivo undoretaading of tbo Haitian people, the holding of the election8 ram a cballonpo to take up and an irrational fear to overcome. On 28 November 1997, under the military junta, full of enthueiaem, voting card in hand, hundred8 of voter8 were beatmn in front of a votinq booth in Port-au-Prince. After theme intentionally rigged electione, eucceseive 9 ’ government8 emerged by ~pyp d et& or by pbony elections made to meaeure by the military. The United Xatione Observer Group for the Verification of the Elections in Haiti (ONWRR) eatiefied the civilian population in three ways: security. the support of the international comnuaity and above all the possibility that we would attain our objective, nsmely, to rebuild Raiti on the basis of a democratic ideal. The elections were only the instrument chosen for striving for that ideal. Am the Secretary-General emphasised in the final connents of him report on this ieeue. “Elections in and of themselves do not constitute democracy. They are not an end but a Etep, Blbeit an important and often essential one, on the path towards the democratization of societies and the realization of the right to take part in the governance of one’s country as enunciated in major international human rights instruments. Xt would be unfortunate to confuse the end with thz means and to forget that democracy implies far more than the mere act of periodically c:asting a vote, but covers the entire procsrs of participation by citisenr in the political life of their country.” (&/46/6&para. 76) The draft resolution we are considering today in order to decide on its viablility in the United Rations progrsmrn err8 on the ride of formalism, aa if voting were the eolutioa to all I,roblems. In thim draft resolution there is no mention of any proporal that would formally rupport the government resulting from these elections assisted by the United Nations. Our experience must serve a0 an example. The Grgani8ation spent millions of dollars to make OWVCH posrible. If Cedrar and hi8 acolytes, by dint of their arms, succeed in their deadly undertakiag, what will have been the point of the elections? What will be the point of institutionaliring this draft resolution in the activities of the United Nations? My Government wishes to appeal once again to the Assembly to use all its powers to ensure respect for the law in Haiti. The international community has helped the Haitian electoral process and it therefore has a moral duty to the Haitian people who day after day are being felled by the army’s bullets. In order to make this draft resolution credible, the United Nations must strive to help the HaitiaD people restore constitutional order to Haiti so that our island can reemerge as a democracy. l%-!!! (Colombia) (interpretation from Spanish): My delegation wishes to state its views on draft resolution I, “Enhancing the effectiveness of the principle of periodic aDd genuine elections”, contaiaed in document A/46/721/Add.l. The Government of Colombia reaffirms its strict respect for international law and the Charter of the United Nations, Article 2 in particular, as well as for the norms of human rights that qovern principles of the participation of peoples and individuals in their governments and political systems. My delegation would likm to ewharise the importance of l treo9thoniog the principle of 9eouioe and froo eloctiooa 8n a fundamental priociplo in order to eomuro that human rights are obaervod and roapected. In thia connection we in our own democratic rymtom implement what. im l tipulatod in article 21 of the Univerasl Declarstioo of Human Rlghtm that "Rvoryooo har the right to take part in the government of hia country, directly or through freely chore0 repreaentative8”. Similarly, we emphaaiae what ia l tipulsted in article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that “All peoplea have the right to self-determination” and that “Ry virtue of that right they freely determine their political atatua”. Similarly, we would like to reiterate the universal recognition of sovereign equality of all States sod the right of each and every one of them to choose and freely develop ite own political, economic, cultural and social system. Colombia, for ita part, ia pleased to have one of the oldest democracies in the world1 it has enabled us to hold periodic and free electiona in the -ourso of more than 100 years in which various ideological national trends have been represented. Since March of last year we have held four national elections. To problems in our democracy we have responded with more democracy. Sovereignty, self-determination and the independence of States and peoples are the cornerstones of the United Nations Charter. 10 that context, electoral processes are matters that fall fully within the purview of the domestic jurisdirtion of States and are the expression of their sovereignty. United Nations participation in some electoral processes has been exceptional in nature and does not flow from any right or established custom but, rather, is the result of exceptional circumstances: cases of decolonisation, the result of peace-making processes, or when the Government of a Member State has explicitly requested it. (-m) H~llC~, Colombis agrees that the Orqanixation can provide various formr of electoral assistance, in exceptional cases and on en ad hoc basis. But we do not consider that it ia necessary for the Secretary-General to appoint a high official to serve as the focal point in coordinating requests for electoral verification or assistance, when such activities are, in principle, of en exceptional nature and fall under the domestSc jurisdiction of States, in accordaoco with Article 2, paragraph 7, of the United Nations Charter. In sny event, we wish to reiterate that the explicit request of the Government of a Member State is indispensable before any electoral assistance can be provided. In conclusion, we would like to reaffirm that electoral processes must be understood within the framework of the principles of international law and seen in the light of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. For those reasons, my delegation will be unable to vote in favour of this draft resolution. plr, ARALA (Kenya): My delegation voted against draft resolution A/C.3/46/L.6l/Rev.l in the Third Committee. We did so not because Kenya does not believe in or uphold the principle of periodic and genuine elections. Indeed, the Constitution of Kenya provides for elections every five years. Kenynns have, accordingly, gone to the polls regularly for the past 26 years without interruption to elect their representatives. He are not opposed in principle either to the institutionalization of a practice that has been implemented by the Organization over the pest several decades, namely, popular consultations or elections, even though we are aware of the fact that some in the Assembly at best lent qualified support but otherwise voted aqainst the conduct of such popular consultations or elections in tho colonial Tsrritorioe, in total dirropard of the principle of l quel rights and relf-determination of poopler, aa laid down in Article 1, paragraph 2, of the United Nation8 Charter. My delegation’s concern ir, rather, with the msnnor in which the Assembly is being ruahed, withnut any apparently good reason, into adopting a reaolution before an exhaustive erchan9e of view8 on such an important i8auer and on which only a handful or rmall percentage of Member States have rubmltted poritiona in response to the Secretary-General’s request. We do not advocate an indefinite delay, nor presume that the Secretary-General will receive a lOO-per-cent response before he actI. Wo feel that our apprehensions are justified by the fact that only a handful -tf Member States have responded, nome of whom expressed opposing views, and alao by the doubts expressed in the Secretary-General’s report on concepts ured in the document, or precision of expressions such as “electoral assi8tenco”. “supervision”, “observation”, “verification”, “monitoring”, and 80 on. It has been observed by some delegations that there is no single model of democracy. Genuine democracy, according to us, evolves from the cultural heritage, traditions and accepted practices of the people. This Organization stands as a unique forum for all Member States, large and small, to consult and exchange ideas and views in order not only to harmonize the different systems and concepts but also to gain a deeper understanding of why we may differ from one another, without necessarily being wrong. Because of those reasons, my delegation will again vote against the draft resolution in document A/C.3/46/L.dl/Rev.l - now before the Assembly as draft resolution I in document A14617211Add.l. We sincerely hope, however, that the democratisation procoma we meek to l rtablirh will be refloctod to a qroater degree of trsnapareacy in our Orgeni8ation and that my delegation will, at eome future date, find it possible to arsociate itself unrerervedly with the sentiments exprerrod ia a similar draft rerolutioa. me (interpretation from Arabic18 The Aarembly will now turn to part I of the report (A/46/7211. The report of the fifth Conknittee on the progrenme-budget intplicstions of draft rerolutioar II, III, VT2 and XXX, and draft de:irion II is contained in document A/46/776. The Alrsembly will firrt take a decision on the 27 draft reeolutioam contained in paragraph 102 of part I of the report. Draft resolution I ir entitled “United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same7 t reswon I warn (resolution 461110). m Pv (interprotatioa from Ar8bic)r Draft rorolutioa IX ir entitled “Effective inplenentation of international inrtrumentr on burn rights, including reporting obligations under ioternational inrtruvntr on human r igh:;s” . The Third Committee adopted draft rerolution II without 8 vote. -Y 1 take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? DfsfLad (rerolutioa 4611111. me PRW (interpretation frora Arabic)8 Draft r8rolutioo III iS entitled “Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child”. Draft resolution III vaa adopted by the Third Coaritteo uithout a vote. May X take it that the Assembly also wishes to do ~07 (rerolution 4611121. w (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution IV ia entitled “International convenants on human rights”. The Third Corrmittte adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. -Y * take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? Draft r-on IV was adopted (resolution 46/113). me PRESIDENT (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution V i8 entitled “International Convention on the Protection of thu Rights of all Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families”. Draft resolution V was adopted by the Third Comnittee without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly also wishes to do so? t resolution V was ad- (resolution 461114). The PRESIDEm (interpretation fram Arabic): Draft rerolution VI ir entitled “Non-discrimination and protection of minorities”. The Third Comitteo adopted draft resolution VI without a vote. May I take it that the Am~mbly wisher to do the 1~07 t rem VI m (rerolution 46/115). W (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution VII is entitled “World Conference on Human Rights”. Draft rerolution VII was adopted by the Third Coanitter without a vote. May I tab it that the Assembly wisher to do the camel prnft row VII was &&&~fl (resolution 46/116). I&m (interpretation from Aripbic)r Draft resolution VIII is entitled “Alternative approaches and ways and means within the United Natia-nr ayntem for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental f reedoma”. A recorded vote has been requested. d vote was tsbaa . Znfavout Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam. Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, CLUMroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myaxuaar. Namibia, Nepal, New ZealaDd, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Syria, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Ram, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe AmiJaatl Isrsol, United Statos of Merice -1 Albania, Argentina, Aurtralia, Auattia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Rstoniq, ?inland, ?rance, Germany, Greece, BUngary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Ualta, Netherlands, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom of Greet Britain and Northern Ireland Rraft mml&i~n VIII war by l2LmMua 1. u&b 34 abrtentiorrs (re8OlUtiOB 46/117). m (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution IX is entitled "StrOBgtheniBg of the Centre for Human Rightr". The Third Conunittse adopted draft resolution IX without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? Draft resollllipe IX was ado- (resolution 461118). m PREW (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution X is entitled "The protection of persona with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care". Draft resolution X was adopted by the Third Comnittee without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly also wishes to do ~07 ptaft ream X was a- (resolution 461119). The PRE- (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution XI is entitled “Human rights in the administration of justice”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XI without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? Draft resolution XI was ado- (resolution 461120). m PRESIDENT (interpretation from Arabic): Dral’t resolution XII is entitled “Human rights and extreme poverty”. Draft roaolutioa XII wae adopted by tbo Third Coamittee without a vote. May I take it that the Mmembly wirhar to do the name? was w (rerolutioa 461121). m (interpretation from Arabic)! Draft rerolutioo XIII is entitled “United Nations Voluntary Trust Fund on Contemporary loma of S 1 ave ry” . The Third Comitteo adopted draft resolution XIII without a vote. -Y 1 take it that the Asrembly wisher to do the mame? Daft fw XIII wa8 sdoptad (resolution 161122). w (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution XIV is entitled “Right to development”. Draft resolution XIV was adopted by the Third Comittee without a vote. May I take it that the Arsembly also wishes to do so? Draft resolw XIV was adppted (resolution 461123). TBp PSESIDE- (interpretation froa Arabic): Draft resolution XV is entitled “National institutions for the protection and promotion of human rights”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XV without a vote. WY 1 take it that the Asseably wishes to do the same? Draft tcsolutipp XV was ado- (resolution 461124).

The President unattributed [Arabic] #13984
Draft resolution XVI is entitled “Question of enforced or involuntary disappearances”. Draft resolution XVI was adopted by the Third Comnittee without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? * DrafcJ esolution XVI was adooted (resolution 461125). m (interpretation from Arabic)r Draft rerolutioa XVII is entitled “Human riphtlr and scientific and technological progroor”. The Third Connittee adopted draft rarolution XVII without a vote. my 1 take it that the Assembly wishee to do the #ame7 prntf rem-II wan adopLId (resolution 461126). w (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolutioo XVIII is entitled “Human rights and mass exoduses”. Draft resolution XVIII waa adopted by the Third Cant-ittee without a vote. Uay I take it that the Assembly also wishes to do ao? rer&&.j~III wa8 ad- Irerolution 461127). 0 PBEW (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution XIX is entitled “International Year for the World’s Indigenous People”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XIX without a vote. WY * take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same7 Drsflresolution XIX was aboot,& (resolution 4611261. no PRESIDlW (ioterpretatioo fron Arabic): Draft resolution XX is entitled “Strengthening of United Nations action in the human rights field through the promotion of international cooperation and the importance of non-selectivity, impartiality and objectivity”. The Assembly has before it also ao amendment contained in document A/46/t.S2. which, if adopted, would delete the last operative paragraph of the draft resolution - that is, operative paragraph 12. In accordance with rule 90 of the rules of procedure, the Assembly will first take a decision on this amendment. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to adopt the amendment contaioed in document A/46/L.52? The amendment was adoptg.0. v (interpretation from Arabic): We shall now take a docirion on draft resolution XX, as amended. Dr6ft resolution XX wan adopted by the Third Connittee without a vote. Uay I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise? on IpL 61 amem wa6 w (resolution 461129). s (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution XXI ir ontitled “Respect for the principles of national sovereignty and non-iatorference in the internal affairs of Statea in their electoral prccosaem”. A recorded vote has been requested. b rewd vote wan tskm . In_fsvourr Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangledesh, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Camroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, C6te d’lvoire, Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, @jibouti, Dominican Republic, Bcuador, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of). Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Pali, Mauritania. Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Xorambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan. Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Sudan. Suriname, Swaziland, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe : Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America -8 Cbilo, Comta Rica, Cyprus, Dominica, Itbioph, Fiji. Hoadurmm, Jamaica, Lobanon, tilta, Marrhall f~lmvh. mo!xplia, Samoa br 102 vou to 40. rria 13 m (rerolutioa 46/130).* ‘lhr (iaterpretetioa from Arabic)1 Draft resolution Xx11 is entitled “Elimination of all forma of roligiour intoleraoco”. Tbe Third Coanittoe adopted draft rorolutioa XXII without a vote. WY 1 take it that the Arrmbly wirher to do the saw? a-g&p- (rerolution 461131). s (interpretation from Arabic): Draft remolution XXIII ir entitled “Situation in Myanmsr”. Draft resolution XXIII vaa adopted by the Third Committee without a vote. May I take it tbat tbo Alrrorbly wirbor to do the s&me? U&f.Lll wa19dpolLp (rerolution 461132). CL Subsequently, the delegations of Lebanon and the Syrian Arab Republic advised the Secretariat that they had intended to vote in favour. The PBBSIDSNT (interpretation from Arabic): Draft rssoIutioa XfW is entitled "Situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kl Salvador". Tbc Third Couroittee adopted draft resolution XXIV without a vote. t&y I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? &raft resolution XXIV was ad- (resolution 461133). The PRSSIDSNT (interpretation from Arabic): Draft resolution XXV iS entitled "Situation of homas rights in Iraq". A recorded vote has been requested. A recorded vote was taken. -favout: Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas. Bahrain, Barbados, Delarus, Belgium, Seliae, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brasil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, c~roO1L~ Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Pica, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia. Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador. Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland. France, Gabon, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Latvia, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius. Mexico, Mongolia, Morambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Norway, Oman, Panama. Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, ltvanda. Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Sewa, Sao Tome end Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Suriname, Swasiland, Sweden, Sy:ian Arab Republic, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey. Ukraine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezzuela, Yugoslavia, Zambia Auainsf: Iraq Abstaining: Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, China, C&e d*Ivoire, Cuba, Indonesia, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Lesotho, Malaysia, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zimbebwe Draft resolution XXV was adopted bv 129 votes to 1, with 17 iahStQJ&&BR (resolution 46/134).
Vote: 31/127 Consensus
Vote: A/RES/46/117 Recorded Vote
✓ 123   ✗ 2   34 abs.
Show country votes
✓ Yes (123)
Vote: A/RES/46/130 Recorded Vote
✓ 102   ✗ 40   13 abs.
Show country votes
✓ Yes (102)
Vote: A/RES/46/134 Recorded Vote
✓ 129   ✗ 1   17 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No (1)
✓ Yes (129)
Vote: A/RES/46/135 Recorded Vote
✓ 155   ✗ 1   0 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No (1)
✓ Yes (155)
Vote: A/RES/46/137 Recorded Vote
✓ 134   ✗ 4   13 abs.
Show country votes
✓ Yes (134)
The President unattributed [Arabic] #13985
Draft resolution KKW is entitled "Situation of human rights in Kuwait under Iraqi occupation". A recorded vote has been requested. A recorded vote was taken. In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria. Burkina PaSO, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros. Congo, Costa Rica, C&e d'Ivoire. Cuba, Cyprus. Cxechoslovakia, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador. Egypt, El Salvador, Bstonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, Prance. Gabon, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea. Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives. Mali. Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico. Mongolia, Morocco, Mosambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Togo. Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania. United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe Aaainst: Iraq Draft resolution XXVI was. adopted bv 155 votes to 1 (resolution 46/135).* * Subsequently, the delegation of Liechtenstein advised the Secretariat that it had intended to vote in favour. w (iaterpretstlon from Arabic)2 Draft rmrolution XXVII is entitled “Situation of human rights in Afghanistan”. The Third Cmltteo adopted draft roeolution XVII without a vote. May I take It that the Amsembly vishes to do the same? If was adO- (rerolutioa 461136). -PReSfDtKT (ioterpretatiou from Arabic): The Assembly will now take a decision on the tuo draft decisions coatalaed in paragraph 103 of part I of the report in document A/46/721. Draft Cacirion I is entitled “Statue of the Convention BgaiUat Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment”. The Third Conunittee adopted draft decision I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to adopt it. as orally amended by the Recherlandr? t de&ion 1. 81 QU,UY aftboaPaQLane36~~* Ths PR- (interpretation from Arabic): Draft decision II is entitled “Consideration of the request for revision of article 6, paragraph 6, of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”. Draft decision 11 was adopted by the Third Comittee without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise? . . t dcclalon 11 was adootcd . m PREm (interpretation from Arabic): The Assembly will now turn to part II of the report (A/46/72l/Add.l of the Third COImaittOO and first take a decision on the two draft resolutions contained in paragraph 26. DraPt resolution I is entitled “Enhancing the effectiveness of the principle of periodic and genuine elections”. The report of the t’ifth Committee on the prograamne-budget implications of the draft resolution are contained in document A/46/784. A recorded vote has been requested. In.hwr Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh. Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Braril, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia. Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic. Chad, Chile, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, C6te d’ Ivoi re, Cyprus, Ctechoslovakia, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica. Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France. Gabon, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Biseau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Malshall Islands, Mauritania, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria. Norway, than, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Swatiland, Sweden, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, United States Of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia Auainsf: Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Kenya, Namibia mstaininq: Angola, China, Colombia, Indonesia. Iraq, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Sudan, Uganda, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe Draft resolution I was adovbd by 134 votes to 4, with 13 abmntion4 (resolution 46/137).*
The President unattributed [Arabic] #13986
Draft resolution II is entitled “Human rights in Haiti”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same? Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 46/138). c Subsequently, the delegations of Kenya and Namibia advised the Secretariat that. they had intended to vote in favour. mm (interpretation from Arabic), The Amrembly will nou take a decision on the draft decision contained in psragrsph 29 Jf part II of the report of the Third Comittee. The Third Conunittee rrcormnand& the adoption of the draft decirion entitled “Reports considered under the item entitled ‘Wwnan right6 questions’“. Hay I take it that the Assembly wishes to adopt the draft decision? aft dm&&,n-war m . I *hall now call on those representatives who wish to make statements in explanation of vote. &, TROTI’m (Canada) I My delegation joined in the consensus adoption of draft rerolution X, entitled “The protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care”. However, we do have a concern about Principle 20 of the annex to that resolution. Principle 20.4 of this resolution provides that the treatment of criminal offenders determined to have a mental illneaa ohall in all circumstances be consistent with provisions regarding consent to treatment in Principle 11. While Canada is generally in compliance with Principle 20, recent ameudments to our criminal code permit a caurt to order treatment of an accused who has been found unfit to stand trial. The rationale for this provision is twofold. It prevents detention without trial and promotes trial within a reasonable time while the evidence for a defence is still available. Court-ordered treatment is subject to very strict restrictions, and an accused may appeal a court’s compulsory treatment order. The amendments to the Canadian criminal code take great care to protect and balance the conflicting interests of the accused - not to be subject to treatment without consent, on the one hand, an not to be detained unnecessarily on the other. n (Argontier) (intorprotntioa from 8panirh)i My dologation wlmhom to oxplain itm vote on draft rmmolution XXI on “Rompect for the principlom ot’ national l ovoroignty and non-latorforoaco ia the iatornal affairr of Iltator In their l loctoral procommom”. Argentina voted against that draft resolution because it emphasises the confrontational aspects of electoral assistance from the United Nations, instead of giving the proper weight to the very institution of electoral assistance. In so far as the mechanism is established at the request of the country seeking assistance, it is not necessary to reaffirm the principles of national sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of States, which are in any event protected by the Charter of our Organization.
Vote: 40/230 Recorded Vote
✓ 134   ✗ 4   0 abs.
Show country votes
For the reasons we stated in the Third Committee, the United States did not participate in the General Assembly's action on draft resolutions II, VII and XIV in document A/46/721, under agenda item 90. Mr. HURST (Antigua and Barbuda): At the opening of the past three sessions of the General Assembly. Antigua and Barbuda brought before this body the plight of the world's indigenous peoples. Today my delegation is pleased to join in lending its support to draft resolution XIX in document A/46/721, declaring 1993 the International Year for the World's Indigenous People. It may be recalled that last year my delegation abstained when a similar draft resolution was introduced. citing two reasons for our action. First, we were of the view that the draft resolution vas devoid of resolve and thus failed to project a point of view. A resolution on indigenous peoples which failed to make reference to the SOO-year history of the collision between explorers and indigenous peoples, and which did not explicitly address the concerns and perils faced by the powerless indigenous peoples today, required more work. Secondly, my delegation desired to have 1992 designated as the year in which the United Nations would pay a special tribute to the world's indigenous peoples. Mindful that our sentiments might have caused others to think that our rttaatloe vm focured l xclu~ivsly on the indigenour poop100 of the Americmm and the Caribbean, vo carefully poiatod out that the SOO-year annivetmary of the vimit of a Buropean explorer to my country’@ roqioa vaa but a l park to ignite our burning concorn for human righta rorldvido. I take tbir opportunity once more to repeat that my countrmn do oot accept the viov that Chrirtopher Coluxbus dircovered the new world. Undoubtobly it vat hi8 accidental encounter with the Caribbean and the boricmm which mot off the trip-wire of today’8 history, to the bonofit of mon and to tbo l vidont detriment of the indigenous people6 that greeted him. Ybough tbo romolution failr to address this matter explicitly, my doleqation ir of the viev that there has been a sufficient reformulation of itr terms to cau8e it to win our approval today. I l lro take thir opportunity to applaud the Governmentr of Brasil, Veoeauela and Canada for the bold and just decisions vhich each haa recently taken to mecure a better future for several indigenous peoples within itm borderm. The Yanonami people in Braril and Venezuela now enjoy protection8 prevlou8ly denied these Amazonian forest dwellers, and the Inuit, or Bskimo, people of Canada’r Northwest Territories will exercise increasing coatrolr over their vamt ancestral homelands. A great deal more remains to be done, and Antigua and Barbuda will be for ever diligent in purruing protections for the world’s indigenous peopler. We would think that in providing a platform for the down-trodden and the weak, the victimired and the powerless our United Nations can be relied upon to luroarth the facts, to expose injustice, to promote peaceful coexistence and to champion truth. We believe this resolution will achieve much.* * Mr. Rogers (Belize), Vic-- President, took the Chair. w (Panama) (intorpretstion from Spanish): My delopatioa abrtainod in the vote on draft rorolutioa VIII, “Alteraativo approaches and uaym and mean@ within the United Nations ayrtem for improving the l ffoctivo enjoyment of human riqhtr and fundamental freedoms”, in docuwnt A/46/121. Our porition in no way COnatitUtOe opposition to the fundamental principle of rorpect for hwaan rights. Oa the contrary, our country hss frequently nsdo it clear in rerolutionr hero, and in other forums, thst ve have no resrrvationa uhatroever about defending human rights and IundaJneotal f reodoma. Horavor, we conridor that draft roaolutioa VIII imposes conditions that could be used aa l ncuse8 for violations of human rights and fundamental f reedomr . Although wo are aware that the existence of certain livin9 conditions favours the enjoyment of human rights, we cannot accept uae cf that criterion as en excuse for failure to observe human rights. We consider tha: the democratic system is the fundamental basis for respect for human rights and that it is good to seek certain living conditions, but lack of such a system and conditions cannot justify violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms. & DINH ‘UU MIHH WXQ! (Viet Nam): My delegation abstained in the vote on draft resolution I, “Enhancing the effectiveness of the principle of periodic and genuine elections”, in document A/46/72l/Add.l. We wish to reaffirm the following points. The political, social, legal and electoral systems of a country are matters of that country’s domestic jurisdiction, and should be established in accordance with its legislation. There is no universal need for the United llations to provide l lect?raX amrimtaace to Member States. Electoral asriatance by the United Ratioal aunt remain an exceptional activity of the Orqauitation, and should be undertaken only in rpecial circ-urnstances, such as cases of decoloniration, or in the contest of regional or international peace processes or at the requert of rpecific sovereign States. It must be undertaken in strict conformity with the principlea of sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affair@ of State8. The exirting United Nations organ which provides electoral asrirtanco to Uember States at their request has functioned effectively. We regard it a# unncessary to establish a new United Nations structure to verify electiona of provide electoral assistance. M6. SEMApuHI! (Uganda): Before I give Uganda’s explanation of vote, I rhould like, as Rapporteur of the Committee, to draw attention to an omission from the report contained in document A/46/721/Add.l. Turkey rhould have been included in the list c’ .poosors of draft resolution I in that document. I shall now give my explanation of vote. Uganda abstained in the vote oo draft resolution I in document A/46/721/Add.l. We support efforts aimed at promoting democracy, including those aimed at enhaocioq the effectiveness of the principle of periodic and genuine elections. We therefore support the general thrust of the resolution. Nevertheless, we had difficulty vith operative paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 which made it impossible for us to support the draft resolution as a whole. The qumtion of olectioar is an important and sensitive issue of great interomt to all couatries. Tar this reason, we believe that the yropoaals advanced in the operative psraqraphs we have cited should be carefully studied and should be based on the broadest possible consideration of the views of Member Gtstss. In view of the rensitivity of the issue, in particular 88 it concerns matters of sovereignty, we believe that there should be clear criteria for responses to requests for electoral assistance to Member States. Furthermore, the mandate of the proposed structure or mechanism should have buen agreed upon before a decision wa8 takeo OD the proposal. We believe that the United Nation8 should continue to provida electoral assistance to Member States in exceptional circumstances. This should be at their explicit request and in conformity with established principles of international law. We regret that the Conwnittee was unable to allow for more time 8Dd study on this question. This, in our view, was a little out of step with the democratic principle the resolution seeks to enhance. SAUD (Saudi Arabia) (interpretation from Arabic): When reviewing the report in docunent A/46/721 as regards draft resolut ion IV under agenda item 98, entitled “International covenants on human rights” , we noted that there was no reference to our statement after the adoption of that draft resolution by consensus in the Third Committee in which ve explained our reservation on the fifth preambular paragraph regarding the Second Optional Protocol aiming at the abolition of the death penalty. Therefore I would like our official position on the fifth preainbular paragraph as indicated in the Third Committee to be recorded in the official records of this meetinq. m (Islemic Republic of Iran)1 Since, in my delegation’s view, the contents of draft resolution I in document A/46/72l/Add.l entitle4 “Knhancing the l ffoctivenosr of the principles of periodic and genuine slectionr”, are not consistent with practice and the provisions of the Charter and may provide a pretext for abuse in the futrrre, it chose not to participate in the voting oo the draft resolution. My country adheres to the principle of periodic and genuine olectionr. According to the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran the affairs of the country must be administered on the basis of public voting through the election of the President, the representative of the Consultative Aarombly, and member6 of the Council, or through referendums held on certain important economic, cultural or political issues. Mrs. (Indonesia) : My delegation is speaking in explanation of vote on draft resolution I contained in document A14617211Add.1, entitled “Enhancing the effectiveness of the principle of genuine and genuine elections”. Indonesia is a democratic country that has upheld the electoral process since its independence in 1945. The draft resolution entitled “Rnhancing the effectiveness of the principle of periodic and genuine electiona” deserves the support of my delegation as it supported resolution 43/157 of 8 December 1988, resolution 441146 of 15 December 1989 and resolution 451150 of 18 December 1990. However, this time my delegation abstained from voting because we had reservations on aspects concerning the role of the Offices of the Secretary-General, spec’fically the designation of a senior official to act as focal point, and we feel that requests from Member States for electoral assistance should be dealt with on an ad hoc basis. It is our view that implewation of periodic and 9oaui1m elections is l atirely aa Interaal matter. Indoneria doea, however, support the provision of technical assirtance to roquemtiag States. Clr. (China) (interpretation from Chinera); A few minutes a90 the General Arrombly adopted without a vote draft resolution XVI on the question of enforced or involuntary dirappearancer, contained ia document A/46/721. On 29 Novenber after tbo adoption of tbir resolution in the Third Cormnittee the Chinese delegation rade an explanatory rtatcwnt in which it euprersed reservations on it and hoped that those reservations would he recorded. According to the rules of proc*durs of the General Assembly, I will not repeat our re8ervstions here. We have noted that the paragraph 63 of the Third Coamnitteo’r report (A/46/7211 failed to record the afarementioned reservations of the Chinese delegation. We hope tbat the Secretariat will make the necessary amendment. v (Zimbabwe): I l hould lika to explain Zirbabwe’m vow. Tbo Goverment of Zimbabwe rompectm the United Uationm Chartor and international Aar. Since achieving independence in 1980, after e prolonged liberation l truggle, Zirrbabw ham held genuine l lectionm l verp five yearm and ham thum deroamtrated that it upholdm and cherimhem that principle. Roweve r , tidalwe abstained in the vote on nraft remolution I in docwaent A/46/721/Add.l, entitled “tnhanci~g the l ffoctiveaomm of the principle of periodic and genuine electionm”. Ue did mo, not because we do not believe that the United Hationm l hould not be involved, but because we are concorned about operative paragraph6 9, 10 and 11. We believe that conrultationm on the appoinmnt of a l enior United lations official to coordinate electoral natterm and on the inmtitutionalimation of that wchanisr l hould have been carried further. -: The Assembly ham concluded its consideration of agenda iten 98. We turn now to agenda iten 12, which ir entitled “9eport of the Economic and Social Council”. I call on the reprerentative of Austria to introduce an amenWnt to the report of the Third Conumittee (A/46/717 and Add.1). Hr. KRw (Austria): Yesterday the General Assembly adopted a draft resolution - am anber.ded in accordance with a proposal put forward by the representative of Xorgzlia - on the international literacy year. By mean8 of the last paragraph of that resolution the General Assembly decided to dimcurm the question of the international literacy year again at its fiftieth session. The Third Coaritt,e’s programe of work should be Msnded accordingly. I therefore propose the following technical change in the draft resolution reconunended in document A/46/717/Add.l: on page 8, under the heading “Jten 4. develomrwzat socisl II I “International Literacy Year” should tm followd by “(I995)” instead of “(odd yoarr)” and rhould be lirtad 80 aa annual rather than a biennial quemtloo. am: l’be Ammmbly ha8 before it a draft rerolutlon ret-ndod by the Third Comittee in psraqraph 12 of its report (A/46/717); two draft decirionr recowwmded by the Third Coarittea in paragraph 13 of the manw document7 and a draft resolution recorrended by the Third Cmittee in paragraph 7 of document A/46/717/Add.l. The draft resolution contained in paragraph 12 of document A/46/717 is entitled “Social dwelopment”. The Third Conrittee adopted thm draft remolution rithout a vote. Xay I take it tbat the General Asrerbly wisher to do the same? draft rapplylipn was &91&9d (rerolution 461139). -: We turn now to the two draft rlecisionr contained in paragraph 13 of document A/46/717. Draft decision J, entitled “Non-governmental organi%atione”, was adopted by the Third Comittee without a vote. May I take it that the General Assembly wishes to do the same? . I&aft dcuion 1 wa8 adoo$& . -: Draft decision II, entitled “Report of the Economic and Social Council”, uas adopted by the Third Conunittee. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise? . . Draftn w . IllI-: We shall now proceed to take a decision on the draft resolution recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 7 of document A/46/717/Add.l. The draft resolution is entitled “Rationaliration of the work of the Third Committee, including the bioonial progrsmmr of vork of the Comnittoe for 1992-1993”. Wsy 1 take it that the Arrembly wimher to adopt the draft resolution a8 orally amended by Auatris? t rm 88 Wy wd. wa# @&m (reeolutian 461140). Tbs’ 1 call on the reprereatative of the United Stater for an explanation of vote. &m (United States of America): lor the reasons that we gave in the Third Comittee the United States did not participate in the General Assembly’8 action on the draft resolution under agendlr item 12. Ihe: We have thus concluded our consideration of the part of the report of the Economic and Social Council allocsted to the Third Cormnittee. meellna rose at 11.10 a.m.
Vote: 32/132 Consensus
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/46/PV.75.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/A-46-PV-75/. Accessed .