A/59/PV.74 General Assembly
▶ This meeting at a glance
152
Speeches
15
Countries
76
Resolutions
Resolutions:
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
32/95,
31/127,
32/97,
32/98,
32/99,
32/100,
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
32/95,
31/37,
32/132,
32/95,
31/37,
32/132,
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
32/95,
31/37,
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
31/37,
32/132,
31/125,
32/132,
31/125,
31/37,
32/95,
31/127,
32/97,
32/98,
32/99,
32/100,
32/101,
32/127,
32/128,
39/192,
34/131,
40/230,
48/137,
40/233,
36/170,
48/140,
39/201,
59/209,
59/210,
59/211,
59/212,
59/213,
A/RES/59/173,
A/RES/59/177,
A/RES/59/178,
A/RES/59/179,
A/RES/59/181,
A/RES/59/184,
A/RES/59/185,
A/RES/59/193,
A/RES/59/195,
A/RES/59/188,
A/RES/59/197,
A/RES/59/199,
A/RES/59/201,
A/RES/59/202,
A/RES/59/203,
A/RES/59/204,
A/RES/59/205,
A/RES/59/206,
A/RES/59/207
Topics
UN resolutions and decisions
Human rights and rule of law
General statements and positions
Counterterrorism and crime
Economic development programmes
Security Council deliberations
In the absence of the President, Mr. Chowdhury (Bangladesh), Vice-President, took the Chair.
Vote:
A/RES/59/173
Recorded Vote
✓ 117
✗ 5
62 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(62)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Benin
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Colombia
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
El Salvador
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Haiti
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Tonga
-
Tuvalu
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uruguay
-
Vanuatu
Absent
(7)
✓ Yes
(117)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cabo Verde
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/177
Recorded Vote
✓ 183
✗ 3
2 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(3)
Absent
(3)
✓ Yes
(183)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/178
Recorded Vote
✓ 129
✗ 46
13 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(13)
✗ No
(46)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(3)
✓ Yes
(129)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/179
Recorded Vote
✓ 179
✗ 5
3 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(3)
Absent
(4)
✓ Yes
(179)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/181
Recorded Vote
✓ 128
✗ 52
4 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(4)
✗ No
(52)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(7)
✓ Yes
(128)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Costa Rica
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/184
Recorded Vote
✓ 129
✗ 53
4 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(53)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(5)
✓ Yes
(129)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/185
Recorded Vote
✓ 181
✗ 2
4 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(2)
Absent
(4)
✓ Yes
(181)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/193
Recorded Vote
✓ 125
✗ 55
6 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(55)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(5)
✓ Yes
(125)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/195
Recorded Vote
✓ 127
✗ 50
8 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(50)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(127)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/188
Recorded Vote
✓ 132
✗ 53
0 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(53)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(6)
✓ Yes
(132)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/197
Recorded Vote
✓ 142
✗ 0
43 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(43)
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Belarus
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Djibouti
-
Egypt
-
Ethiopia
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Libya
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mauritania
-
Morocco
-
Myanmar
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Qatar
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Singapore
-
Sudan
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zimbabwe
✓ Yes
(142)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Barbados
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chile
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Latvia
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Mozambique
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Zambia
Vote:
A/RES/59/199
Recorded Vote
✓ 186
✗ 0
0 abs.
Show country votes
Absent
(5)
✓ Yes
(186)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
United States of America
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/201
Recorded Vote
✓ 172
✗ 0
15 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(15)
Absent
(4)
✓ Yes
(172)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
United States of America
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
Vote:
A/RES/59/202
Recorded Vote
✓ 182
✗ 3
0 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(3)
Absent
(6)
✓ Yes
(182)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/203
Recorded Vote
✓ 122
✗ 3
61 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(61)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Paraguay
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uzbekistan
✗ No
(3)
Absent
(5)
✓ Yes
(122)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Costa Rica
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/204
Recorded Vote
✓ 118
✗ 55
13 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(13)
✗ No
(55)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Absent
(5)
✓ Yes
(118)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
A/RES/59/205
Recorded Vote
✓ 71
✗ 54
55 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(55)
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Bahamas
-
Barbados
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Colombia
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Ghana
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
-
Jamaica
-
Kenya
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Madagascar
-
Mauritius
-
Mozambique
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Philippines
-
Republic of Korea
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Thailand
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Zambia
✗ No
(54)
-
Algeria
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Belarus
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Chad
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Egypt
-
Gambia
-
Guinea
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lebanon
-
Libya
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mauritania
-
Morocco
-
Myanmar
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Togo
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Ukraine
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zimbabwe
Absent
(11)
✓ Yes
(71)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
El Salvador
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Haiti
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kiribati
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Tuvalu
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Vote:
A/RES/59/206
Recorded Vote
✓ 69
✗ 47
63 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(63)
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Armenia
-
Bahamas
-
Barbados
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Botswana
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Colombia
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Ecuador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Jamaica
-
Kenya
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Madagascar
-
Mali
-
Mauritius
-
Mozambique
-
Namibia
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Philippines
-
Moldova
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Vanuatu
-
Zambia
✗ No
(47)
-
Algeria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Belarus
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Chad
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Egypt
-
Gambia
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lebanon
-
Libya
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mauritania
-
Morocco
-
Myanmar
-
Nepal
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Qatar
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Somalia
-
Sudan
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zimbabwe
Absent
(12)
✓ Yes
(69)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Argentina
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Brazil
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Dominican Republic
-
El Salvador
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
Vote:
A/RES/59/207
Recorded Vote
✓ 76
✗ 2
100 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(100)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Absent
(13)
✓ Yes
(76)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Dominican Republic
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Estonia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
-
Uruguay
The meeting was called to order at 3.10 p.m.
Reports of the Third Committee
The General Assembly will consider the reports of the Third Committee on agenda items 93 to 105 and on sub-items (a) to (e) of item 105. I understand that consultations are still ongoing under agenda item 109. The report of the Third Committee on that item, contained in document A/59/609 will therefore be considered at a date to be announced.
I request the Rapporteur of the Third Committee, Mr. Carlos Enrique García González of El Salvador, to introduce, in one intervention, the reports of the Third Committee.
96. Crime prevention and criminal justice Report of the Third Committee (A/59/494)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
97. International drug control Report of the Third Committee (A/59/495)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
99. Implementation of the outcome of the Fourth World Conference on Women and of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly, entitled “Women 2000: gender equality, development and peace for the twenty-first century” Report of the Third Committee (A/59/497)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
100. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, questions relating to refugees, returnees and displaced persons and humanitarian questions Report of the Third Committee (A/59/498)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
103. Elimination of racism and racial discrimination Report of the Third Committee (A/59/501)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
I have the honour to introduce, for consideration by the plenary of the General Assembly, the reports of the Third Committee on the items entrusted to it by the Assembly.
Under agenda item 93, entitled “Implementation of the outcome of the World Summit for Social Development and of the twenty-fourth special session of the General Assembly”, the Third Committee recommends in paragraph 18 of document A/59/491 the adoption of one draft resolution.
Under agenda item 94, entitled “Social development, including questions relating to the world social situation and to youth, ageing, disabled persons and the family”, the Third Committee recommends in paragraph 25 of document A/59/492 the adoption of three draft resolutions and, in paragraph 26, the adoption of two draft decisions.
Under agenda item 95, entitled “Follow-up to the International Year of Older Persons: Second World Assembly on Ageing”, the Committee recommends in paragraph 14 of document A/59/493 the adoption of one draft resolution.
Under agenda item 96, entitled “Crime prevention and criminal justice”, the Committee recommends in paragraph 39 of document A/59/494 the adoption of nine draft resolutions and, in paragraph 40 the adoption of one draft decision.
Under agenda item 97, entitled “International drug control”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 20 of document A/59/495, the adoption of four draft resolutions. Here, I would like to correct an omission in paragraph 16 of the report. The following delegations should be added as original sponsors of draft resolution IV (A/C.3/59/L.19/Rev.1): Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Austria, the Bahamas, Canada, Chile, Croatia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Dominican Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Paraguay, Poland, the United States of America and Uruguay.
Under agenda item 98, entitled “Advancement of women”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 27 of document A/59/496, the adoption of four draft resolutions and, in paragraph 28, the adoption of one draft decision.
Under agenda item 99, entitled “Implementation of the outcome of the Fourth World Conference on Women and of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly, entitled ‘Women 2000: gender equality, development and peace for the twenty-first century’”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 14 of document A/59/497, the adoption of two draft resolutions.
Under agenda item 100, entitled “Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, questions relating to refugees, returnees and displaced persons and humanitarian questions”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 24 of document A/59/498, the adoption of four draft resolutions.
Under agenda item 101, entitled “Promotion and protection of the rights of children”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 35 of document A/59/499, the adoption of two draft resolutions and, in paragraph 36, the adoption of one draft decision.
Under agenda item 102, entitled “Programme of activities for the International Decade of the World’s Indigenous People, 1995-2004”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 14 of document A/59/500, the adoption of one draft resolution and, in paragraph 15, the adoption of one draft decision.
Under agenda item 103, entitled “Elimination of racism and racial discrimination”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 23 of document A/59/501, the adoption of three draft resolutions and, in paragraph 24, the adoption of one draft decision.
Under agenda item 104, entitled “Right of peoples to self-determination”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 20 of document A/59/502, the adoption of three draft resolutions.
The report under agenda item 105, entitled “Human rights questions”, has been issued in six parts, contained in documents A/59/503 and addenda 1 to 5. In paragraph 7 of document A/59/503, the Third Committee recommends the adoption of one draft decision.
Under item 105 (a), entitled “Implementation of human rights instruments”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 20 of document A/59/503/Add.1, the adoption of three draft resolutions.
Under item 105 (b), entitled “Human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 145 of document A/59/503/Add.2, the adoption of 22 draft resolutions.
Under item 105 (c), entitled “Human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives”, the Third Committee recommends, in paragraph 60 of document A/59/503/Add.3, the adoption of four draft resolutions.
The reports of the Third Committee contained in documents A/59/503/Add.4 and Add.5 indicate that no proposals were submitted under items 105 (d), entitled “Comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action”, or 105 (e), entitled “Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights”.
Finally, under agenda item 109, entitled “Programme planning”, the report of the Third Committee contained in document A/59/609 indicates that the Committee took note of programme 19 in document A/59/6 (Prog. 19), and decided to transmit it, through the President of the General Assembly, to the Fifth Committee.
Before concluding, I should like to thank the other members of the Bureau of the Third Committee; their support and their cooperation — and the support of all members — helped ensure that the Committee was able to conclude its work successfully.
Having said that, I respectfully commend the reports of the Third Committee to the General Assembly for its consideration.
101. Promotion and protection of the rights of children Report of the Third Committee (A/59/499)
Vote:
31/37
Recorded Vote
✓ 117
✗ 5
62 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(62)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Benin
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Colombia
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
El Salvador
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Haiti
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Tonga
-
Tuvalu
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uruguay
-
Vanuatu
✓ Yes
(117)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cabo Verde
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
104. Right of peoples to self-determination Report of the Third Committee (A/59/502)
Vote:
31/37
Recorded Vote
✓ 129
✗ 46
13 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(12)
✗ No
(46)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(129)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
I wish at this stage to announce that the report of the Third Committee on agenda item 109 (A/59/609) will be considered by the Assembly at a later date.
If there is no proposal under rule 66 of the rules of procedure, I shall take it that the General Assembly decides not to discuss the reports of the Third Committee which are before the Assembly today.
98. Advancement of women Report of the Third Committee (A/59/496)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
12. Report of the Economic and Social Council Report of the Economic and Social Council (A/59/3/Add.2) Draft resolutions (A/59/L.47 and A/59/L.48)
Vote:
59/209
Consensus
56. Cooperation between the United Nations and regional and other organizations (a) Cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union
Vote:
59/213
Consensus
It was so decided.
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Statements will therefore be limited to explanations of vote. The positions of delegations regarding the recommendations of the Third Committee have been made clear in the Committee and are reflected in the relevant official records. May I remind members that under paragraph 7 of decision 34/401, the General Assembly agreed that,
“When the same draft resolution is considered in a Main Committee and in plenary meeting, a delegation should, as far as possible explain its vote only once, i.e., either in the Committee or in plenary meeting, unless that delegation’s vote in plenary meeting is different from its vote in the Committee.”
May I remind delegations that, also in accordance with General Assembly decision 34/401, explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Before we begin to take action on the recommendations contained in reports of the Third Committee, I should like to advise representatives that we are going to proceed to take decisions in the same manner as was done in the Third Committee, unless the Secretariat is notified otherwise in advance. That means that where recorded votes or separate votes were taken, we will do the same. I would also hope that we may proceed to adopt without a vote those recommendations that were adopted without a vote in the Third Committee.
94. Social development, including questions relating to the world social situation and to youth, ageing, disabled persons and the family Report of the Third Committee (A/59/492)
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
105. Human rights questions Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503)
Vote:
32/132
Recorded Vote
✓ 128
✗ 52
4 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(4)
✗ No
(52)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(128)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
93. Implementation of the outcome of the World Summit for Social Development and of the twenty-fourth special session of the General Assembly Report of the Third Committee (A/59/491)
The Assembly has before it a draft resolution recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 18 of its report. We will now take a decision on the draft resolution. The Third Committee adopted the draft resolution without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
32/132
Recorded Vote
✓ 179
✗ 5
3 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(2)
✓ Yes
(179)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
59/210
Consensus
The draft resolution was adopted (resolution 59/146).
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 93?
Vote:
32/132
Consensus
Vote:
31/125
Recorded Vote
✓ 183
✗ 3
2 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(1)
✗ No
(3)
✓ Yes
(183)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
It was so decided.
Vote:
32/95
Consensus
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
39. Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including special economic assistance
Vote:
59/211
Consensus
The Assembly has before it three draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 25 of its report and two draft decisions recommended by the Committee in paragraph 26 of the same report.
I give the floor to those representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote or position before action is taken on the draft resolutions I to III and on draft decisions I and II.
Vote:
32/95
Consensus
Vote:
32/95
Consensus
Vote:
32/95
Consensus
The United States dissociates itself from consensus on draft resolution I, “Celebration of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family and beyond”. We note that, on 6 December, this Assembly adopted by consensus a very similar resolution, resolution 59/111, entitled “Celebrating the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family”. General Assembly resolution 59/111 better reflects the current negotiated international agreement on how to recognize and celebrate this important milestone.
Draft resolution I, contained in document A/59/492, was originally negotiated in February 2004 at the Commission for Social Development, considerably prior to the 6 December consensus on resolution 59/111. Draft resolution I passed through the Economic and Social Council to the General Assembly at its fifty-ninth session, where it was reported out of the Third Committee in mid-November. Therefore, resolution 59/111 remains the most recent negotiated agreement by the Assembly at its fifty-ninth session on this subject.
Draft resolution I includes the phrase, “in different cultural, political and social systems various forms of the family exist” (second preambular paragraph). Going forward, we must consider that
phrase in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights definition of the family, and in the context of the Secretary-General’s report of 23 July 2004, which stated:
“Given the diversity of family structures and relationships, family policies should not focus on one type of family alone. Instead, they should take into account all types of family, including single-parent, compound, extended and recomposed families, and make provision for the different needs and particular circumstances of each”. (A/59/176, para. 10)
On the occasion of the conclusion of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family, my delegation takes this opportunity to state its appreciation for the efforts of the Government of Qatar in organizing and hosting the Doha International Conference for the Family. My delegation also welcomes the Doha Declaration of 30 November 2004 (A/59/592, annex).
Both General Assembly resolution 59/111 and today’s draft resolution I call for Secretariat reporting and for the Assembly to continue consideration of issues related to the family at its sixtieth session. The United States delegation is confident that such reporting, Secretariat activities and intergovernmental consideration will draw definitively from General Assembly resolution 59/111 and from the Secretary- General’s report in document A/59/176 on preparations for and observance of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family in 2004.
Vote:
31/125
Consensus
The State of Qatar attaches great importance to issues relating to the family. Like the rest of the international community, we believe that the family is the basic unit of society and that it deserves to be supported and protected by society and the State. The Higher Council for Family Affairs was created in Qatar to ensure such support and protection for the family.
On that basis, and in response to the General Assembly’s call last year, the State of Qatar has actively participated in celebrating the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family by hosting the Doha International Conference for the Family in November, which adopted the international Doha Declaration on the family. The delegation of Qatar submitted a draft resolution to the General Assembly entitled “Celebrating the tenth anniversary
of the International Year of the Family” (A/59/L.29) under agenda item 94, which the General Assembly adopted as resolution 59/111.
One of the reasons for the submission of that draft resolution was that draft resolution I in the present report of the Third Committee, submitted under the same item, did not reflect the past year’s activities and events on the family, and did therefore not live up to its title. Draft resolution I was negotiated at last February’s session of the Commission for Social Development. The Third Committee then decided on 14 December to submit draft resolution I to the plenary General Assembly for its consideration.
If this draft resolution is adopted, it would be the latest General Assembly resolution on the family. Although it makes reference to all previous resolutions, it does not refer to resolution 59/111, for the simple reason that that resolution had not been adopted when draft resolution I was formulated. In order not to hamper the work of the General Assembly, we have decided not to propose an amendment to the draft resolution at this late stage. Nevertheless, we would like to stress here that this is not the only resolution adopted this year providing mandates on issues related to the family.
The second preambular paragraph of the draft resolution includes a reference to various forms of the family in different cultural, political and social systems. My delegation believes that this language must be interpreted in a way that does not contradict the Universal Declaration of Human Rights definition of the family as the basic unit of society. We must not go counter to differing national legislation and religious beliefs related to the family in various societies.
On that basis, my delegation would like to dissociate itself from the consensus on draft resolution I recommended by the Third Committee in document A/59/492.
Vote:
59/212
Consensus
My delegation would like very briefly to explain its position on draft resolution I, pertaining to the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family.
We welcome the fact that the draft resolution bears in mind the family in all its forms — just as we stated the other day when we commemorated the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family —
whether as has been enshrined in various international commitments, including those emanating from the Beijing Fourth World Conference on Women, the Beijing+5 process, the Copenhagen World Summit for Social Development, the Copenhagen+5 process and the special session of the General Assembly on children, or as set out in legal instruments such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the definition that we have accepted for many years on the basis of commitments all of us undertook on the basis of consensus.
Vote:
31/127
Consensus
We shall now take decisions on draft resolutions I to III and draft decisions I and II, which were recommended by the Third Committee in paragraphs 25 and 26, respectively, of its report contained in document A/59/492.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Celebration of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family and beyond”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/147).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Policies and programmes involving youth: tenth anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth to the Year 2000 and Beyond”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/97
Consensus
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/148).
Draft resolution III is entitled “United Nations Literacy Decade: education for all”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
31/37
Consensus
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/149).
Vote:
32/98
Consensus
We turn now to draft decision I, entitled “Proposed supplement to the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities”. The Third Committee adopted draft decision I. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft decision I was adopted.
Draft decision II is entitled “Report of the Secretary-General on the preparations for and observance of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family in 2004”. May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to adopt draft decision II, which was recommended by the Third Committee?
Vote:
32/99
Consensus
Draft decision II was adopted.
I call on the observer of the Holy See.
Archbishop Migliore (Holy See): My delegation would like to make some brief remarks on resolution 59/147, on the family. On 6 December, after lengthy negotiations, the Assembly adopted by consensus resolution 59/111, regarding the celebration of the tenth anniversary of the International Year of the Family. Today, the Assembly has just adopted a resolution on the same subject that appears to move away from the unequivocal definition of the family as found in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in subsequent United Nations juridical instruments. The Holy See hopes that, in the future, the work of the Secretariat and intergovernmental considerations and activities will be guided by the consensus mandate of resolution 59/111.
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 94?
Vote:
32/100
Consensus
It was so decided.
95. Follow-up to the International Year of Older Persons: Second World Assembly on Ageing Report of the Third Committee (A/59/493)
The Assembly has before it a draft resolution recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 14 of its report contained in document A/59/493. We shall now take a decision on the draft resolution, entitled “Follow-up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing”. The Third Committee adopted the draft resolution without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/95
Consensus
The draft resolution was adopted (resolution 59/150).
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 95?
It was so decided.
Vote:
31/127
Consensus
The Assembly has before it nine draft resolutions and one draft decision recommended by the Third Committee in paragraphs 39 and 40, respectively, of its report contained in document A/59/494. We shall now take a decision on draft resolutions I to IX and on the draft decision.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Preparations for the Eleventh United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/151).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Assistance to least developed countries to ensure their participation in the sessions of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice and the sessions of conferences of States parties”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/152).
Vote:
32/97
Recorded Vote
✓ 132
✗ 53
0 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(52)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
✓ Yes
(132)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Draft resolution III is entitled “Strengthening international cooperation and technical assistance in promoting the implementation of the universal conventions and protocols related to terrorism within the framework of the activities of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/153).
Draft resolution IV is entitled “International cooperation in the prevention,
combating and elimination of kidnapping and in providing assistance to victims”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/98
Consensus
Draft resolution IV was adopted (resolution 59/154).
Draft resolution V is entitled “Action against corruption: assistance to States in capacity-building with a view to facilitating the entry into force and subsequent implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution V without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution V was adopted (resolution 59/155).
Vote:
32/99
Consensus
Draft resolution VI is entitled “Preventing, combating and punishing trafficking in human organs”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution VI without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution VI was adopted (resolution 59/156).
Draft resolution VII is entitled “International cooperation in the fight against transnational organized crime: assistance to States in capacity-building with a view to facilitating the implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution VII without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/100
Consensus
Draft resolution VII was adopted (resolution 59/157).
Draft resolution VIII is entitled “United Nations African Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution VIII without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution VIII was adopted (resolution 59/158).
Vote:
32/101
Consensus
Draft resolution IX is entitled “Strengthening the United Nations Crime
Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme, in particular its technical cooperation capacity”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IX without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution IX was adopted (resolution 59/159).
We now turn to the draft decision entitled “Reports considered by the General Assembly in connection with the question of crime prevention and criminal justice”. May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
The draft decision was adopted.
Vote:
32/127
Recorded Vote
✓ 125
✗ 55
6 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(55)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(125)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 96?
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it four draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 20 of its report. We will now take decisions on draft resolutions I to IV.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Control of cultivation of and trafficking in cannabis”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
32/128
Consensus
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/160).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Providing support to the Government of Afghanistan in its efforts to eliminate illicit opium and foster stability and security in the region”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/161).
Draft resolution III is entitled “Follow-up on strengthening the systems of
control over chemical precursors and preventing their diversion and trafficking”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
39/192
Recorded Vote
✓ 127
✗ 50
8 abs.
Show country votes
✗ No
(50)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(127)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/162).
Draft resolution IV is entitled “International cooperation against the world drug problem”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution IV was adopted (resolution 59/163).
Vote:
34/131
Consensus
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 97?
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it four draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 27 of its report and one draft decision recommended by the Committee in paragraph 28 of the same report.
Before proceeding further, I should like to inform members that action on draft resolution III, entitled “Future operation of the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women”, is postponed to a later date to allow time for the review of its programme budget implications by the Fifth Committee. The Assembly will take action on draft resolution III as soon as the report of the Fifth Committee on its programme budget implications is available.
I now give the floor to the representative of Qatar to speak in explanation of vote before the voting.
When the Third Committee adopted the draft resolution on the future operation of the International Research and
Training Institute for the Advancement of Women, Spain joined the list of its sponsors.
As to the draft resolution in the Third Committee’s report entitled “Working towards the elimination of crimes against women and girls committed in the name of honour”, my country accords the utmost importance to such issues. Women enjoy their full rights in the State of Qatar. The High Council for Family Affairs, created to protect and promote the rights of families and women, has always stressed equality of rights between men and women and proscribed all discrimination against women. Qatari law in particular provides for severe punishment for crimes against women. We therefore support the condemnation of violent crimes committed women in the name of honour.
Qatar therefore regrets that the delegation which submitted the draft resolution failed during informal consultations to respond to demands by some States to omit reference to paragraph 3 (i) on sexual and reproductive health. Such terminology has many interpretations, some of which are counter to our national legislation and religious beliefs. We therefore dissociate ourselves from this draft resolution and wish to have our decision be reflected in the official records of this session.
We will now take a decision on draft resolutions I, II and IV and on the draft decision.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Improvement of the status of women in the United Nations system”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/164).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Working towards the elimination of crimes against women and girls committed in the name of honour”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/165).
Draft resolution IV is entitled “Trafficking in women and girls”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution IV was adopted (resolution 59/166).
We now turn to the draft decision entitled “Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the work of its thirtieth and thirty-first sessions”. May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
The draft decision was adopted.
Vote:
40/230
Consensus
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 98.
The Assembly has before it two draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 14 of its report. We will now take a decision on draft resolutions I and II.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Elimination of all forms of violence against women, including crimes identified in the outcome document of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly, entitled ‘Women 2000: gender equality, development and peace for the twenty-first century’”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that this Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/167).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Follow-up to the Fourth World Conference on Women and full implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and the outcome of the twenty-third special session of the General Assembly”. The Third Committee adopted draft
resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/168).
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 99.
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it four draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 24 of its report. We will now take a decision on draft resolutions I to IV.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Enlargement of the Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that this Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/169).
Vote:
48/137
Consensus
Draft resolution II is entitled “Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/170).
Draft resolution III is entitled “New international humanitarian order”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/171).
Vote:
40/233
Consensus
Draft resolution IV is entitled “Assistance to refugees, returnees and displaced persons in Africa”. The Third Committee
adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do that also?
Draft resolution IV was adopted (resolution 59/172).
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 100?
It was so decided.
Vote:
36/170
Recorded Vote
✓ 182
✗ 3
0 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(1)
✗ No
(3)
✓ Yes
(182)
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
The Assembly has before it two draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 35 of its report and one draft decision recommended by the Committee in paragraph 36 of the same report.
Before proceeding further, I should like to inform members that action on draft resolution II, entitled “Rights of the child”, is postponed to a later date to allow time for the review of its programme budget implications by the Fifth Committee. The Assembly will take action on draft resolution II as soon as the report of the Fifth Committee on its programme budget implications is available.
We will now take a decision on draft resolution I and on the draft decision.
Draft resolution I is entitled “The situation of and assistance to Palestinian children”.
A recorded vote has been requested. [Subsequently the delegation of Costa Rica advised the Secretariat that it had intended to abstain.]
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution I was adopted by 117 votes to 5, with 62 abstentions (resolution 59/173).
We now turn to the draft decision, entitled “Report of the Committee on the
Rights of the Child”. May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
Vote:
48/140
Recorded Vote
✓ 122
✗ 3
61 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(61)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Paraguay
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Uzbekistan
✗ No
(3)
✓ Yes
(122)
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
The draft decision was adopted.
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 101.
The President took the Chair.
102. Programme of activities for the International Decade of the World’s Indigenous People, 1995-2004 Report of the Third Committee (A/59/500)
The Assembly has before it a draft resolution and a draft decision recommended by the Third Committee in paragraphs 14 and 15, respectively, of its report contained in document A/59/500.
We shall now take a decision on the draft resolution and the draft decision. We turn first to the draft resolution, entitled “Second International Decade of the World’s Indigenous People”. The Third Committee adopted the draft resolution without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Vote:
39/201
Recorded Vote
✓ 118
✗ 55
13 abs.
Show country votes
— Abstain
(12)
✗ No
(55)
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Armenia
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia and Montenegro
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
✓ Yes
(118)
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
The draft resolution was adopted (resolution 59/174).
We now turn to the draft decision entitled “Reports considered by the General Assembly in connection with the question of the Programme of activities for the International Decade of the World’s Indigenous People”. May I take it that the General Assembly wishes to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
The draft decision was adopted.
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 102?
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it three draft resolutions and one draft decision recommended by the Committee in paragraphs 23 and 24, respectively, of its report contained in document A/59/501.
We shall now take a decision on draft resolutions I to III and on the draft decision.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Measures to be taken against political platforms and activities based on doctrines of superiority and violent nationalist ideologies which are based on racial discrimination or ethnic exclusiveness and xenophobia, including neo- Nazism”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the General Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/175).
Draft resolution II is entitled “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution II without a vote. May I take it that the General Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution II was adopted (resolution 59/176).
Draft resolution III is entitled “Global efforts for the total elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution III was adopted by 183 votes to 3, with 2 abstentions (resolution 59/177).
The Assembly will now turn to the draft decision, entitled “Report of the Secretary-General under agenda item 103”. May I take it that the General Assembly decides to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
The draft decision was adopted.
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 103?
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it three draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 20 of its report contained in document A/59/502.
We shall now take a decision on draft resolutions I to III.
Draft resolution I is entitled “Use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution I was adopted by 129 votes to 46, with 13 abstentions (resolution 59/178).
Draft resolution II is entitled “The right of the Palestinian people to self-determination”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution II was adopted by 179 votes to 5, with 3 abstentions (resolution 59/179).
Draft resolution III is entitled “Universal realization of the right of peoples to self-determination”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/180).
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 104?
It was so decided.
The Assembly has before it a draft decision recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 7 of its report contained in document A/59/503.
The General Assembly shall now take action on the draft decision, entitled “Reports considered by the General Assembly in connection with human rights questions”. May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to adopt the draft decision recommended by the Third Committee?
The draft decision was adopted.
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 105.
(a) Implementation of human rights instruments
Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503/Add.1)
The Assembly has before it three draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 20 of its report.
Before proceeding, I should like to inform members that action on draft resolution I, entitled “International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families”, is postponed to a later date to allow time for the review of its programme budget implications by the Fifth Committee. The Assembly will take action on draft resolution I as soon as the report of the Fifth Committee on its programme budget implications is available.
The General Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolutions II and III.
Draft resolution II is entitled “Equitable geographical distribution in the membership of the human rights treaty bodies”.
A recorded vote has been requested. [Subsequently, the delegation of Lebanon advised the Secretariat that it had intended to vote in favour.]
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution II was adopted by 128 votes to 52, with 4 abstentions (resolution 59/181).
Draft resolution III is entitled “Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution III without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution III was adopted (resolution 59/182).
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (a) of agenda item 105.
(b) Human rights questions, including alternative approaches to the enjoyment of fundamental human rights and fundamental freedoms
Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503/Add.2)
The Assembly has before it 22 draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 145 of its report.
I call on the representative of the United States in explanation of position before the voting.
With regard to draft resolution XV under sub-item (b) of agenda item 105, on the subject of extrajudicial, summary of arbitrary executions, the United States would like to bring to the attention of the General Assembly the amendment proposed by our delegation to the reference to the International Criminal Court in operative paragraph 6 of the draft resolution during its consideration by the Third Committee (see A/59/503/Add.2, para. 93). We are not going to resubmit the amendment in plenary meeting, but we would like to state that our position has not changed. The United States wishes to underscore that the international community should use all available and appropriate international, regional and domestic judicial mechanisms to address the problem of extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and to hold accountable those responsible for such crimes.
In addition, with regard to draft resolution XVIII under this agenda item, entitled “Question of enforced or involuntary disappearances”, the United States would like to bring to the attention of the General Assembly the amendment proposed by our delegation to the reference to the International Criminal Court in the preambular paragraph of this resolution during its consideration by the Third Committee (see A/59/503/Add.2, para. 114). We will not resubmit the amendment in plenary meeting but we would like to state that our position has not changed. The United States wishes to underscore that the international community should use all available and appropriate international, regional and domestic judicial mechanisms to address the problem of crimes against
humanity including widespread or systemic forced disappearances and to hold accountable those responsible for such crimes.
I call on the representative of Cuba on a point of order.
My delegation would like to draw attention to the fact that the delegation of Egypt should appear among the sponsors of draft resolution XI; the following delegations should appear as sponsors of draft resolution XX: Barbados, Benin, Cambodia, Egypt, Gabon, Papua New Guinea and Turkmenistan.
I call on the representative of Bangladesh on a point of order.
Bangladesh should appear in the list of sponsors of draft resolution IV: “Human rights and extreme poverty”.
The General Assembly will now take up the 22 draft resolutions one by one. After all the decisions have been taken, representatives will again have the opportunity to explain their votes or positions.
We turn first to draft resolution I, entitled “Subregional Centre for Human Rights and Democracy in Central Africa”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution I without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution I was adopted (resolution 59/183).
Draft resolution II is entitled “Globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of all human rights”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution II was adopted by 129 votes to 53, with 4 abstentions (resolution 59/184).
Draft resolution III is entitled “The right to development”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution III was adopted by 181 votes to 2, with 4 abstentions (resolution 59/185).
Draft resolution IV is entitled “Human rights and extreme poverty”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution IV was adopted (resolution 59/186).
Draft resolution V is entitled “Enhancement of international cooperation in the field of human rights”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution V without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution V was adopted (resolution 59/187).
Draft resolution VI is entitled “Human rights and unilateral coercive measures”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution VI was adopted by 132 votes to 53 (resolution 59/188).
Draft resolution VII is entitled “Missing persons”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution VII without a vote. May I take it the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution VII was adopted (resolution 59/189).
Draft resolution VIII is entitled “Strengthening United Nations action in the field of human rights through the promotion of international cooperation and the importance of non-selectivity, impartiality and objectivity”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution VIII without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution VIII was adopted (resolution 59/190).
Draft resolution IX is entitled “Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution IX without a vote. May I take it the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution IX was adopted (resolution 59/191).
Draft resolution X is entitled “Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution X without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution X was adopted (resolution 59/192).
Draft resolution XI is entitled “Promotion of a democratic and equitable international order”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XI was adopted by 125 votes to 55, with 6 abstentions (resolution 59/193).
Draft resolution XII is entitled “Protection of migrants”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XII without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
Draft resolution XII was adopted (resolution 59/194).
Draft resolution XIII is entitled “Human rights and terrorism”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XIII was adopted by 127 votes to 50, with 8 abstentions (resolution 59/195).
Draft resolution XIV is entitled “Regional arrangements for the promotion and protection of human rights”.
The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XIV without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution XIV was adopted (resolution 59/196).
Draft resolution XV is entitled “Extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions”.
Separate votes have been requested on operative paragraph 7 and on the words “including sexual orientation”, after the words “for any discriminatory reason” in operative paragraph 8 (c) of draft resolution XV.
If there are no objections to those requests, I shall first put to the vote operative paragraph 7 of draft resolution XV, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Operative paragraph 7 was retained by 86 votes to 44, with 39 abstentions.
I shall now put to the vote the words “including sexual orientation” after the words “for any discriminatory reason” in operative paragraph 8 (c) of draft resolution XV, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The words “including sexual orientation” were retained by 95 votes to 41, with 26 abstentions.
I shall now put to the vote draft resolution XV as a whole.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XV as a whole was adopted by 142 votes to none, with 43 abstentions (resolution 59/197).
Draft resolution XVI is entitled “Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XVI without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution XVI was adopted (resolution 59/198).
Draft resolution XVII is entitled “Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance”. A separate vote has been requested on operative paragraph 9 of draft resolution
XVII. If there is no objection to that request, I shall first put to the vote operative paragraph 9 of draft resolution XVII, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Operative paragraph 9 of draft resolution XVII was retained by 105 votes to 35, with 19 abstentions.
I shall now put to the vote draft resolution XVII as a whole.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XVII as a whole was adopted by 186 votes to none (resolution 59/199).
Draft resolution XVIII is entitled “Question of enforced or involuntary disappearances”. The Third Committee adopted draft resolution XVIII without a vote. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do likewise?
Draft resolution XVIII was adopted (resolution 59/200).
Draft resolution XIX is entitled “Enhancing the role of regional, subregional and other organizations and arrangements in promoting and consolidating democracy”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XIX was adopted by 172 votes to none, with 15 abstentions (resolution 59/201).
Draft resolution XX is entitled “The right to food”.
A recorded vote has been requested. [Subsequently, the delegation of the United Republic of Tanzania advised the Secretariat that it had intended to vote in favour.]
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XX was adopted by 182 votes to 3 (resolution 59/202).
Draft resolution XXI is entitled “Respect for the right to universal freedom of travel and the vital importance of family reunification”.
A recorded vote has been requested. [Subsequently, the delegation of Paraguay advised the Secretariat that it had intended to vote in favour.]
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XXI was adopted by 122 votes to 3, with 61 abstentions (resolution 59/203).
Draft resolution XXII is entitled “Respect for the purposes and principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations to achieve international cooperation in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms and in solving international problems of a humanitarian character”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution XXII was adopted by 118 votes to 55, with 13 abstentions (resolution 59/204).
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (b) of agenda item 105.
(c) Human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives
Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503/Add.3)
The Assembly has before it four draft resolutions recommended by the Third Committee in paragraph 60 of its report.
Before proceeding further, I should like to inform members that action on draft resolution I, entitled “Situation of human rights in Myanmar”, is postponed to a later date, to allow time for the Fifth Committee to review its programme budget implications. The Assembly will take action on draft resolution I as soon as the report of the Fifth Committee on its programme budget implications is available.
The Assembly will thus take action on draft resolutions II to IV.
I now call on the representative of the United States, who wishes to speak in explanation of vote before the voting.
With regard to draft resolution IV, under agenda item 105 (c), entitled “Situation of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo”, the United States would like to bring to the attention of the General Assembly the amendment proposed by our delegation to the reference to the International Criminal Court in operative paragraph 6 (f) of this draft resolution during its consideration by the Third Committee (see A/59/503/Add.3, para. 41). The United States delegation will not resubmit the amendment in plenary meeting, but we would like to state that our position has not changed. The United States wishes to
underscore that those responsible for human rights and international humanitarian law violations as well as crimes against humanity should be held accountable through all appropriate national and international judicial mechanisms.
The Assembly will now take action on draft resolution II, entitled “Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran”.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution II was adopted by 71 votes to 54, with 55 abstentions (resolution 59/205).
Draft resolution III is entitled “Situation of human rights in Turkmenistan”.
I call on the representative of Turkmenistan on a point of order.
I have asked for the floor under rule 74 of the Assembly’s rules of procedure to request that no action be taken on draft resolution III, entitled “Situation of human rights in Turkmenistan”.
The sponsors of the draft resolution have stated that the text was drafted on the basis of cooperation and that it reflects positive developments in Turkmenistan. Those developments are most impressive, taking into consideration the short time they have been under way. No one can deny the active, open and constructive approach taken by Turkmenistan to resolve issues pertaining to the advancement of human rights. The numerous steps taken by the Government of Turkmenistan in the field of human rights in just one year are evidence of that. One would have to be naïve, to say the least, to expect great results in such a period.
Reckless pressure has been exerted to push through this draft resolution at a time when our country has expressed its openness towards, and readiness for, constructive cooperation. That convinces us that the
sponsors of the draft resolution have goals in mind other than the promotion of human rights. We believe that the proponents of draft resolutions such as this one have been sent very serious signals in the Third Committee when it comes to consideration of countryspecific draft resolutions. They were unable to muster majority support for even one of them — not because Member States do not consider human rights issues to be of the highest priority, but because of the way in which the sponsors are trying to address those issues: by selectively targeting Member States without so much as making an effort to substantiate their allegations.
Sponsors should not to seek out the reasons for such an attitude towards country-specific draft resolutions on the part of States that do not support such texts. Instead, they should ask themselves whether they have chosen the right path and the correct approach to these issues. One cannot selectively blame one country for a certain violation while ignoring the very same sort of violation in one’s own country. No one can claim that the human rights situation in his own country is ideal. Similarly, no one should seek to impose his own strategy and means for the construction of a democratic society.
It is precisely that double standard that explains why most countries do not accept country-specific resolutions. When a country has shown progress in terms of its development and is demonstrating and practising openness and constructive dialogue on that issue, it should be supported and not condemned. We believe in dialogue and cooperation and remain open and dedicated to constructive discussion and work on these issues.
We call on the sponsors of such resolutions to consider other ways of achieving human rights goals than the biased and selective use of such resolutions and other means they currently use, for the most part solely to achieve their own objectives. The search for mutually acceptable ways to develop dialogue on this issue is of the highest priority for us and must be made a similarly high priority for the sponsors.
The importance that we attach to this issue was underscored by the personal participation of Turkmenistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs in the debate on this question in the Third Committee. Turkmenistan once again reasserts that the advancement of our citizens’ rights is our
Government’s highest priority and requests the General Assembly’s support for its efforts in that regard.
We firmly believe that this draft resolution, if adopted, would serve only to impede our efforts and would be extremely counterproductive. Turkmenistan has therefore decided to call for a motion of no action on the draft. We are grateful for the support we have received in the Third Committee and kindly request member States to support our proposal by voting in favour of the motion of no action.
The representative of Turkmenistan has moved, within the terms of rule 74 of the rules of procedure, that no action be taken on draft resolution III. Rule 74 reads in part as follows:
“During the discussion of any matter, a representative may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion. In addition to the proposer of the motion, two representatives may speak in favour of, and two against, the motion, after which the motion shall be immediately put to the vote.”
I call on the representatives of China and Pakistan to speak in favour of the motion.
The Chinese delegation supports the proposal of a no-action motion raised by the Turkmenistan delegation on draft resolution III, entitled “Situation of human rights in Turkmenistan”.
Pakistan takes the floor to make the following statement in support of the noaction motion requested by Turkmenistan on draft resolution III, contained in document A/59/503/Add.3, entitled “Situation of human rights in Turkmenistan”.
The delegation of Pakistan has consistently opposed the practice of submitting draft resolutions that are selectively critical of some developing countries. It is the belief of my delegation that such proposals transform the work of the United Nations into a politically motivated exercise and do not advance in any way the cause of human rights.
Actions at the international level ought to be measured against the consequences and the likely results they may produce. It is our conviction that adopting draft resolutions by naming and shaming some countries will not serve the objectives of the United Nations. On the contrary, it is increases the risk
of generating confrontation and politicization at the international level on human rights issues by creating a gulf between the developed and the developing countries, quite opposite to the agenda of the United Nations itself.
In view of that, Pakistan will support the noaction motion against the draft resolution entitled “Situation of human rights in Turkmenistan”.
I call on the representatives of the United States and the Netherlands to speak against the motion.
My delegation will oppose this procedural motion on the draft resolution on the situation of human rights in Turkmenistan.
One of the basic aims of the United Nations is the promotion of human rights. The draft resolution before us was adopted by the Third Committee, which has recommended it to the General Assembly. The draft resolution considered by the Committee reflected several changes introduced after discussions with the Government of Turkmenistan and did recognize some recent progress in Turkmenistan, while expressing continuing concerns about persistent actions by the Government to limit human rights.
The motion being presented in the General Assembly today is an attempt not only to silence the Assembly’s consideration of the human rights situation in Turkmenistan, but also to silence consideration of a draft resolution recommended to the General Assembly by the Assembly Committee with the primary responsibility for those issues. Such a motion, therefore, also would undermine the work of the Third Committee.
It is entirely appropriate — indeed, it is our responsibility as the General Assembly — to consider this draft resolution without resorting to a procedural motion. We believe that silencing discussion of a human rights draft resolution by use of this motion has no place in the United Nations system. The United States strongly urges members of this body to vote against the no-action motion presented on the draft resolution on the situation of human rights in Turkmenistan, regardless of their voting intentions on draft resolution III contained in document A/59/503/Add.3.
I take the floor on behalf of the European Union to speak against the motion of no action proposed by Turkmenistan.
On 18 November, the Third Committee of the General Assembly adopted the draft resolution on the situation of human rights in Turkmenistan, contained in document A/C.3/59/L.53. Despite registering some improvements, the draft resolution reflected the fact that the overall picture of human rights in Turkmenistan remains one of serious concern and requires the greatest attention of our Organization. Dialogue with all interested parties and constructive and positive cooperation with the Government of Turkmenistan were our constant endeavour in drafting a draft resolution that, following approval by the Third Committee, is today to be considered by the General Assembly.
During a series of discussions with the Government of Turkmenistan, the European Union had listened carefully to its views and, on several occasions, had revised the text to make sure it reflected all positive steps taken to try to improve the situation in the country. We are accordingly confident that the draft resolution is as balanced as it could be.
The European Union therefore deeply regrets that we are now confronted in the plenary by this motion to adjourn the debate on draft resolution III after the Third Committee has already taken action on it. As members of the General Assembly, we should all be aware of the grave implications of this motion, were it to succeed.
First of all, any motion such as this runs contrary to the spirit of dialogue to which we are all attached and undermines the principles of transparency and freedom of expression that are essential to the work of the General Assembly. Secondly, it is incumbent on the General Assembly, as the only United Nations body dealing with human rights that has universal membership, to ensure that all proposals brought before it are considered on their merits. This motion to adjourn the debate seeks to prevent the General Assembly from acting upon the recommendation of the Third Committee. It would therefore prevent the General Assembly from carrying out one of its key mandates.
These are not the only reasons, however, why the European Union is so strongly opposed to this initiative. We should all be aware that a motion such as
this, if successful, would seriously undercut the work done by the Third Committee. The draft resolution on Turkmenistan was adopted by the Third Committee nearly a month ago. This motion in the plenary, after a Main Committee has already acted upon the draft resolution concerned, is an entirely new procedural move that would considerably undermine the work of the Third Committee.
Finally, I would like to add that the wider implications of this initiative are, if anything, the most grave. If the General Assembly were to adopt this motion to take no action, it would amount to the Assembly consciously choosing to ignore a recommendation that had been explicitly made to it by one of its Main Committees. In this case, the Committee concerned is the one entrusted with expertise in the field of human rights. That unheard-of turn of events would undoubtedly have severe implications not only for any future work of the General Assembly in the field of human rights but also for the Assembly’s very credibility in this essential area.
For all those reasons, the European Union strongly urges delegations to vote against this noaction motion, regardless of their voting intentions on draft resolution III contained in document A/59/503/Add.3.
I shall now put to the vote the motion submitted by the representative of Turkmenistan that no action be taken on draft resolution III.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The motion for no action was rejected by 76 votes to 60, with 33 abstentions.
Since the motion for no action has not been adopted, the General Assembly will next proceed to take a decision on draft resolution III.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution III was adopted by 69 votes to 47, with 63 abstentions (resolution 59/206).
Draft resolution IV is entitled “Situation of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo”. A separate vote has been requested on the third preambular paragraph, the fourth preambular paragraph and operative paragraph 5 of draft resolution IV. As there is no objection to those requests we shall proceed accordingly.
I now put to the vote the third preambular paragraph of draft resolution IV, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The third preambular paragraph was retained by 96 votes to 2, with 66 abstentions.
I shall now put to the vote the fourth preambular paragraph of draft resolution IV, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The fourth preambular paragraph was retained by 98 votes to 2, with 65 abstentions.
I shall now put to the vote operative paragraph 5 of draft resolution IV, on which a separate vote has been requested.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Operative paragraph 5 was retained by 96 votes to 2, with 68 abstentions.
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution IV as a whole.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
Draft resolution IV, as a whole, was adopted by 76 votes to 2, with 100 abstentions (resolution 59/207).
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (c) of agenda item 105.
(d) Comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action
Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503/Add.4)
May I take it that the Assembly wishes to take note of the report of the Third Committee?
It was so decided.
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of sub-item (d) of agenda item 105?
It was so decided.
(e) Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Report of the Third Committee (A/59/503/Add.5)
May I take it that the Assembly wishes to take note of the report of the Third Committee?
It was so decided.
May I take it that the General Assembly wishes to conclude its consideration of sub-item (e) of agenda item 105?
It was so decided.
3. Credentials of representatives to the fifty-ninth session of the General Assembly (b) Report of the Credentials Committee Report of the Credentials Committee (A/59/602)
The General Assembly has before it a report of the Credentials Committee, containing a draft resolution recommended by the Committee in paragraph 11 of its report.
The draft resolution reads as follows:
“The General Assembly,
“Having considered the report of the Credentials Committee and the recommendation contained therein,
“Approves the report of the Credentials Committee.”
The General Assembly will now proceed to vote on the draft resolution recommended by the Credentials Committee in paragraph 11 of its report. The Credentials Committee adopted the draft resolution without a vote. May I consider that the General Assembly wishes to do the same?
The draft resolution was adopted (resolution 59/208).
I call on the representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who wishes to speak in explanation of position on the resolution just adopted. I remind delegations that explanations of vote or position are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
My delegation joined the consensus on the resolution just adopted. However, I would like to express the reservations of my delegation on those parts of the report contained in document A/59/602 which may be construed as recognition of Israel.
We have heard the only speaker in explanation of position.
The General Assembly has thus concluded the present stage of its consideration of sub-item (b) of agenda item 3.
Members will recall that the Assembly held a debate on this agenda item, along with agenda item 41, at its 41st plenary meeting, on 26 October 2004.
I call on the representative of Belgium to introduce draft resolutions A/59/L.47 and A/59/L.48.
I have the great pleasure today to introduce draft resolutions A/59/L.47 and A/59/L.48, which were the subject of a lengthy process of consultations that began in May, first in the Economic and Social Council and subsequently in the General Assembly.
As its title indicates, draft resolution A/59/L.47 defines the parameters for a new, smooth transition strategy for countries graduating from the list of least developed countries. The draft resolution describes that process from the first recommendation of the Committee for Development Policy through a country’s graduation from the list. It also invites the countries concerned and their development partners to take a series of steps as the country prepares to graduate from the list.
Draft resolution A/59/L.48 takes note of the recommendation of the Committee for the Development Policy to remove Cape Verde and Maldives from the list of least developed countries.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the delegations that contributed to these draft resolutions, especially those that contributed to, and became sponsors of, draft resolution A/59/L.47.
My delegation would also like to take this opportunity to congratulate Cape Verde and Maldives on the progress they have made. We would like to underscore that we will honour the commitments entered into through draft resolution A/59/L.48 to assist those two countries to avoid any erosion of that progress.
In conclusion, allow me to make four small technical corrections to the English version of draft resolution A/59/L.47.
(spoke in English)
In paragraph 3 (b), the text “, as described in paragraph 3 (a),” should be inserted following the words “The identified country”.
In paragraph 4, a comma should be inserted following the words “the list of least developed countries”.
Paragraph 6 should read as follows:
“Requests the Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme, in his capacity as Chair of the United Nations Development Group, to assist countries graduating from the list of least developed countries by providing, if requested, support of the United Nations Resident Coordinator and the United Nations country team to the consultative mechanism”.
And, lastly, in paragraph 12 the words “to carry out the monitoring of” should be replaced by the words “to monitor”.
(spoke in French)
With those corrections, I would like to commend the two draft resolutions for adoption by the General Assembly by consensus.
The General Assembly will now consider draft resolutions A/59/L.47, as orally corrected, and A/59/L.48.
The Assembly will first take up draft resolution A/59/L.47, entitled “Smooth transition strategy for countries graduating from the list of least developed countries”, as orally corrected.
May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/59/L.47, as orally corrected?
Draft resolution A/59/L.47, as orally corrected, was adopted (resolution 59/209).
The Assembly will now take up draft resolution A/59/L.48, entitled “Report of the Committee for Development Policy on its sixth session”.
May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/59/L.48?
Draft resolution A/59/L.48 was adopted (resolution 59/210).
The resolution just adopted by this Assembly to graduate my country from the list of least developed countries has significant implications. Nevertheless, the resolution constitutes a milestone in the country’s development. We strongly believe that our achievements truly are a testimony to political stability, good governance, prudent policies and hard work by the Government, the private sector and the people of the Maldives. With few or no natural resources and a very fragile economic base, the people of the Maldives have worked hard over the past two decades to achieve this level of development.
With graduation from the category of least developed countries, we are determined to redouble our efforts towards achieving our goal of reaching the level of a middle-income developing country by the year 2020, as promulgated in our Vision 2020 document. But I stress that that will not be possible without the cooperation and support of our development partners and friends. Graduation will not eliminate the inherent vulnerabilities facing our country. The structural handicaps of my country stemming from its geophysical characteristics will continue to pose formidable challenges that we cannot address on our own. The continued assistance and cooperation of the international community will therefore always be vital for us in our development process, even after graduation.
At this point, allow me bring to the attention of the members of the Assembly a book entitled The Maldives — A Nation in Peril, copies of which I have made available at the side tables outside the General Assembly Hall. The book compiles a series of statements made by the President of the Republic of Maldives, His Excellency Mr. Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, on the structural handicaps and the environmental vulnerabilities and threats facing our country. I hope that members will find the book useful in understanding the seriousness of our concerns.
According to the provisions of the two resolutions we have just adopted, the three-year smooth transition period for the Maldives will begin today. Within those three years we hope to actively engage with our development partners to determine the level of support and concessions we will still require after the three-year period has elapsed, and to work out
an appropriate plan to smoothly phase out benefits and concessions without any disruption to our development plans and programmes. We consider a smooth transition to be key to the success of graduation. We will rely on the smooth transition strategy to generate the kind of momentum that is expected to kick-start the dynamic process of development envisaged by the Committee for Development Policy following graduation.
My country pledges to work closely with its development partners in the implementation of the strategy. Even at present, with the assistance of our development partners, we are making every effort to build the human and institutional capacity necessary to integrate ourselves into the world economy and to address our development challenges. Plans are also being made to diversify our economy and to restructure the fisheries industry to foster greater private investment and to transform it into an engine of development. A major population consolidation project for integration of the population through resettlement is under way, and an ambitious agenda for reforming the political system is being implemented in order to further enhance the participation of civil society and the private sector in national development.
Those are undertakings that require greater understanding, assistance and cooperation from our development partners to make our transition smooth and effective. We remain hopeful that our development partners, as well as the United Nations system, will stand beside us, as before, to ensure the sustainable development of the Maldives.
Before I conclude, allow me to express our sincere gratitude to the President, the other members of the Bureau and the members of the Economic and Social Council for the understanding they exhibited in the deliberations on the smooth transition strategy and for the cooperation they extended to my country in the determination of the strategy. We also thank the coordinator, Mr. Edouard Aho-Glele, all members of the group of least developed countries and the members of the Group of 77 for the unqualified support they extended to the Maldives in the deliberations on this issue of prime importance to my country. Finally, allow me also to express our sincere gratitude to Mr. Bruno van der Pluijm of Belgium, for the exemplary manner in which he facilitated negotiations on this very delicate issue.
As the fiftyninth session of the General Assembly draws to an end, I would like, at the outset, to congratulate you, Mr. President, on the able leadership with which you have been conducting the work of this important organ of our Organization. I also wish to reaffirm the support of the Cape Verde delegation for the implementation of your road map for the 2005 high-level events.
The Assembly has just adopted two important resolutions: resolution 59/209, on the smooth transition strategy for countries graduating from the list of least developed countries, and resolution 59/210, on the graduation of Cape Verde and Maldives. This a turning point in the complex process of negotiation that was launched with the presentation to the Economic and Social Council of the first reports of the Committee for Development Policy.
From dissenting stances on the very concept of graduation and on its criteria, positions have evolved into a broad consensus on a number of aspects, thanks to the spirit of understanding and compromise that the parties have shown through their respective facilitators. Because they were convinced that graduation is a great challenge for both the graduating countries and the international community, a number of participants, including my delegation, stressed that ensuring the credibility of the least developed country denomination should not be a determining factor in analysing the issue. They also stressed the need to review graduation criteria against the background of the enormous vulnerabilities and structural handicaps faced by those countries, instead of by using cold figures and data, which are often far from reflecting the realities on the ground.
The island paradox has also been referred to in that context. In fact, although small island developing States generally appear to be among the relatively more prosperous developing countries, they are among the most economically vulnerable and externally dependent. They are therefore the least prepared to withstand the shock of immediate graduation because of their high dependency on foreign trade, their limited diversification and their incapacity for economies of scale.
From our own experience as a small island developing State facing economic, environmental and social vulnerabilities, we know the extent of that paradox. In fact, although Cape Verde has made
important progress in its almost three decades of independence with the assistance of our development partners, it is still very vulnerable economically, and its poverty rate is relatively high. Its high dependence on development aid and remittances from emigrants and its fragile environment, aggravated by persistent drought, pose serious constraints to any sustainable development strategy.
One of the most relevant agreements reached during the discussions was that, before a country’s graduation, conditions should be created to ensure that in the long run, graduation is a genuine step forward and not a setback in the development process. The report of the Secretary-General on formulating a smooth transition for countries graduating from least developed countries status (E/2004/94) has been instrumental in offering guidance to move forward on this issue. Graduation can indeed pave the way for further development if the graduating country is effectively supported in its efforts to adapt policies to the new context and to review strategies for sustainable development. Otherwise, it could disrupt the progress made.
The Cape Verdean Government is convinced that the guidelines for the smooth transition period contained in the resolution we have just adopted are a fair basis for relaunching the development process in the graduating countries.
In line with that position, and having assumed the challenge of graduation, the Government of Cape Verde has promoted a set of measures aimed at launching institutional, economic and social structural reforms to readjust to the new reality. It looks forward to working closely with its development partners and the United Nation system in the preparation of its transition strategy. For that policy to succeed, it is crucial that the resolution on smooth transition be fully respected and that its responsibilities be effectively shared by all stakeholders. In that context, I would like to launch a strong appeal to our development partners for the effective implementation of all provisions of the resolution and for delivery on the commitments made.
While doing so, I wish to emphasize the need for stronger involvement by the international community in the creation of an enabling environment for the effective implementation of the Brussels Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the Decade 2001-2010 and of the Barbados Programme of
Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States. In that context, and in conclusion, I hope that the outcome of the International Meeting to Review the Implementation of the Programme of Action, to be held in Mauritius in January 2005, will decisively contribute to a higher degree of achievements in the implementation of the Programme.
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 12.
Members will recall that the Assembly held the debate on agenda item 39 and its sub-items (a) and (c) at its 51st and 52nd meetings, held on 11 November 2004.
I give the floor to the representative of Qatar to introduce, on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1.
Mr Al-Mahmoud (Qatar) (spoke in Arabic): I have the honour, on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, to introduce draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1, entitled “International cooperation on humanitarian assistance in the field of natural disasters, from relief to development”.
Natural disasters bring various problems in their wake and have particularly adverse impacts, with longlasting consequences for the affected populations, especially in developing countries. Natural disasters also affect the social and economic development of countries in which they occur. While it may not be possible completely to eliminate the suffering caused by natural disasters, efforts towards relief and
development assistance could help in the recovery and long-term rehabilitation of those affected by such disasters.
The Group of 77 and China have once again sought to reiterate the importance of strengthening international cooperation — especially through the effective use of multilateral mechanisms — in the provision of humanitarian assistance during all phases of a disaster, from relief and mitigation to development, including through the provision of adequate resources.
Like similar texts in the past, draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1 reaffirms the principles of 46/182 of 19 December 1991, whose annex contains the guiding principles for the strengthening of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the United Nations system. The draft resolution emphasizes the importance of international cooperation in support of the efforts of affected States in dealing with natural disasters in all their phases. The draft resolution is also mindful of the effects that shortfalls in resources can have on the preparedness for and response to natural disasters.
The draft resolution also emphasizes the importance of enhanced international cooperation to assist developing countries in their efforts to build local and national capacities and stresses the need to promote the access to and transfer of technology and knowledge related to early warning systems and to mitigation programmes to developing countries affected by natural disasters. The draft resolution encourages the further use of space-based and groundbased remote-sensing technologies and the sharing of geographical data, including remotely sensed images.
As was the case with last year’s text, more than 150 countries, including the members of the Group of 77 and China, have sponsored this important draft resolution. We are pleased to announce that, in addition to the countries listed in the document, the following countries have joined the list of sponsors:
(spoke in English)
Andorra, Austria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovenia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.
The following corrections should be made to document A/59/L.26/Rev.1 to bring it into conformity with the language agreed during negotiations. In the sixteenth preambular paragraph, the words “achievement of” should be inserted before the words “internationally agreed development goals”. In the seventeenth preambular paragraph, a comma should be inserted after the word “Secretariat”. Finally, in operative paragraph 2, the word “high” should be inserted before the word “number”.
I give the floor to the representative of the Netherlands to introduce, on behalf of the European Union, draft resolution A/59/L.51.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union.
I should like to announce that, since the publication of draft resolution A/59/L.51, the following countries have become sponsors: Andorra, Brazil, Estonia, Malawi, New Zealand, Serbia and Montenegro and Ukraine.
The delivery of humanitarian assistance is a core function of the United Nations system. Humanitarian personnel provide relief to the most vulnerable and needy in natural disasters and complex emergencies around the world. They implement the humanitarian policies set in the United Nations. They operate under difficult circumstances, often at great personal risk.
The conditions under which they operate have become more dangerous in recent years. Humanitarian personnel, both local and international, are increasingly confronted with violence, including sexual violence, abductions, robbery and intimidation. The safety and security of humanitarian personnel must be of paramount concern to us all: Member States, in particular host countries; the United Nations Secretariat, agencies, funds and programmes; and other humanitarian actors.
The draft resolution on the safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of United Nations personnel, as contained in document A/59/L.51, addresses a number of issues at the core of the safety and security of those providing humanitarian assistance. It calls for full respect for international law, in particular the Geneva Conventions, and recognizes the importance of the various relevant conventions,
such as the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel of 1994.
The draft resolution recognizes the role of the host Government to protect humanitarian workers and to facilitate their work, for instance by ensuring access and allowing the use of telecommunications equipment. It recognizes the need for a strengthened and unified security management system for the United Nations, both at Headquarters and at the field level, and requests the United Nations system, as well as Member States, to take all appropriate measures to that end.
Without prejudice to the ongoing debate in the Fifth Committee, we consider it of the utmost importance that a comprehensive agreement on a strengthened and unified security management system for the United Nations be reached.
The informal consultations on the draft resolution have been constructive and conducted in a positive manner, with broad participation. The draft resolution met with consensus, except for two paragraphs referring to the International Criminal Court (ICC), on which amendments have been introduced (A/59/L.52). We strongly feel that the references to the ICC are relevant to this draft resolution. The Court can play an important role in bringing to justice those responsible for attacks against humanitarian personnel and help end impunity for such acts.
We express our gratitude to all humanitarian personnel operating worldwide and hope that this draft resolution contributes to the success of their work to provide assistance to those most vulnerable and in need.
I now give the floor to the representative of the United States of America to introduce the amendments contained in document A/59/L.52.
I have asked for the floor to introduce the United States amendments proposed in document A/59/L.52.
The United States has proposed the replacement of two paragraphs in draft resolution A/59/L.51 with language to enhance the text and to make it more widely acceptable. We feel that this important draft resolution should have strong support by all Member States.
We shall now proceed to consider draft resolutions A/59/L.26/Rev.1, as orally corrected, and A/59/L.51 and the amendments thereto contained in document A/59/L.52.
The General Assembly will first take a decision on the proposals under agenda item 39. Thereafter, the Assembly will take a decision on the proposal under sub-item (a) of agenda item 39.
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/59/L.51 and on the amendments thereto contained in document A/59/L.52.
In accordance with rule 90 of the rules of procedure, the amendments are voted on first. The Assembly will therefore first take a decision on the amendments circulated in document A/59/L.52.
A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
The amendments to draft resolution A/59/L.51, contained in document A/59/L.52, were rejected by 89 votes to 1, with 27 abstentions.
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/59/L.51, entitled “Safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of United Nations personnel”. Before the Assembly takes a decision on the draft resolution, I wish to announce that since the submission of draft resolution A/59/L.51, the following delegation has become a sponsor: Mali.
It is my understanding that there are requests not to put draft resolution A/59/L.51 to a vote. May I take it therefore that it is the wish of the Assembly to adopt A/59/L.51?
Draft resolution A/59/L.51 was adopted (resolution 59/211).
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1, entitled: “International cooperation on humanitarian assistance in the field of natural disasters, from relief to development”, as orally corrected. Before the Assembly takes a decision on draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1, I wish to announce that since the draft resolution was introduced, the following country has become a sponsor: Finland.
May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to adopt draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1, as orally corrected?
Draft resolution A/59/L.26/Rev.1, as orally corrected, was adopted (resolution 59/212).
I call on the representative of the United States, who wishes to speak in explanation of position on the resolutions just adopted.
The United States strongly supports the broad principles enunciated in resolution 59/211, especially the need to
protect humanitarian workers and peacekeepers from violence directed against them. As aid workers worldwide must work in increasingly difficult and dangerous environments, those principles remain fundamental. Based on our support for the principles of safety and security for all humanitarian personnel, and reflecting the strong United States role in continuing to provide humanitarian assistance, the United States has joined consensus on this resolution.
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of sub-item (a) of agenda item 39?
It was so decided.
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 39.
Members will recall that the Assembly held its debate on agenda item 56 and its sub-items (a) to (t) at its 38th to 40th plenary meetings, on 21 and 22 October 2004.
I now give the floor to the representative of Nigeria to introduce draft resolution A/59/L.54.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the sponsors of draft resolution A/59/L.54, entitled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union”. I should like to announce that since the publication of the draft resolution, the following countries have become sponsors: China, Germany, Hungary, Malaysia, Slovakia, Slovenia and the United Kingdom.
It will be recalled that in the General Assembly debate on this item last October, Member States called for continued and greater cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union. That was based on an appreciation of the impact of such cooperation on regional peace, security and development. It was based also on the fact that regional strategies have
proved invaluable in the global efforts of the United Nations and the international community to attain a world that is secure and at peace with itself.
The challenges facing African countries and the African Union in achieving regional peace, security and development remain daunting. Considerable efforts have been deployed to tackle the problems of poverty, disease and the resolution of armed conflicts. The attainment of those goals requires concerted efforts of the international community to remove the main obstacles in that regard, particularly the resolution of the debt overhang and the deployment of resources. For us in the continent, the challenges of ensuring sustainable development cannot be overemphasized. The present draft resolution is intended to strengthen the efforts of the African Union through cooperation with the United Nations and the international community in that regard. In addition, the draft resolution takes cognizance of the expanded mandate and the new organs of the African Union since the adoption of the previous resolution on the same subject, resolution 57/48.
On behalf of African Member States, I wish to convey our appreciation for the wide participation by the United Nations membership in negotiating this draft resolution. That was a further demonstration of support for the efforts of the African Union to tackle the challenges facing the continent.
Finally, on behalf of the sponsors of draft resolution A/59/L.54, on cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union, I call on the General Assembly to adopt the draft resolution by consensus.
We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/59/L.54,
entitled: “Cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union”.
Before the Assembly takes a decision on draft resolution A/59/L.54, I wish to announce that since the draft was introduced, the following countries have become sponsors: Belgium, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, France, the Gambia, Greece, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius and Uganda.
May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/59/L.54?
Draft resolution A/59/L.54 was adopted (resolution 59/213).
May I take it that it is the wish of the General Assembly to conclude its consideration of agenda item 56 (a)?
It was so decided.
Further postponement of date of recess
Members will recall that, at its 71st plenary meeting, on 10 December 2004, the General Assembly decided that the fiftyninth session would recess on Monday, 20 December 2004.
However, in view of the work that remains to be done for this part of the session, I would like to propose to the Assembly that it postpone the date of recess of the current session to Thursday, 23 December 2004.
In the absence of objection, may I take it that the Assembly agrees to that proposal?
It was so decided.
The meeting was adjourned at 6.35 p.m.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/59/PV.74.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/meeting/A-59-PV-74/. Accessed .