← Votes

A/RES/51/29 GA

Middle East peace process

51
Session
159
Yes
3
No
2
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/51/L.40
Adopted symbol A/RES/51/29
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Significance ★ Important vote US State Dept designation
Sponsors (1)
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document A/RES/51/29 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/51/PV.72 Dec. 4, 1996

1 surprising vote — country whose ideal point predicts the opposite position.

— Abstain (2)
✗ No (3)
Absent (21)
✓ Yes (159)
Speeches following this vote (12) may include explanations of vote
The President
I shall now call on those representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote. May I remind them that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by representatives from their seats.
Mr. Robinson (United States of America)
My Government is pleased once again to have cast its vote in favour of the annual resolution on the Middle East peace process. This resolution is a clear endorsement of the efforts the parties have made, often against long odds, to keep moving forward in their mutual quest for a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East. It is an acknowledgement that their commitments deserve the g…
Ms. Rubinstein (Israel)
My delegation welcomes the adoption of the resolution entitled “Middle East peace process”, also known as the “positive resolution”, which expresses the support of the international community for the ongoing peace process in our region. Israel wishes to take this opportunity to call once again on our neighbours to renew negotiations without preconditions. Only through direct talks will we be abl…
Mr. Guyot (France)
Like last year, while France voted in favour of the text entitled “Middle East peace process”, it did not co-sponsor the draft resolution for reasons that are well known to the General Assembly. We feel in point of fact that the absence of any reference to Security Council resolution 425 (1978) is a regrettable lacuna. France attaches particular importance to respect for the principles set out in…
Mr. Yassin (Sudan)
My delegation has frequently expressed its firm belief in the possibility of achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East in the interests of all States in the region. We also believe that peace in the Middle East is indivisible. That, too, is in the interests of all States of the region. Peace must include all tracks and Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Arab territori…
Mr. Abderahman (Egypt)
I am speaking on behalf of the Arab States that voted in favour of the resolution on the Middle East peace process. The Arab Summit in Cairo last June made peace a strategic choice — a choice that it has fully supported. This was reflected in the statements of the Arab States that participated in the debate on this agenda item. Most of the Arab States voted in favour of the resolution as an expr…
Mr. Dlamini (Eswatini)
Before I qualify the position my delegation has taken, I have a statement that was circulated by the delegation of Israel. The last paragraph, if I may be allowed to reflect on it, reads as follows: “The General Assembly is not the correct forum for the discussion of these issues. Any attempt by the United Nations to adopt such resolutions will only serve to prejudge the outcome of the negotiati…
Mr. Escovar Salom (Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)
As in previous years, Venezuela voted in favour of resolutions 51/27 and 51/29 on Jerusalem and the Middle East peace process, respectively, under the agenda item on the situation in the Middle East. We would like to emphasize, however — in accordance with statements made by the Heads of State and Government of the Ibero-American Conference recently held in Chile — that it is our position that t…
Mr. Marsico (Argentina)
As it did in 1995, the delegation of Argentina has abstained in the voting on resolution 51/28. The
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote. In accordance with General Assembly resolutions 3237 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974 and 43/177 of 15 December 1988, I now call on the Permanent Observer of Palestine.
Mr. Al-Kidwa (State of Palestine)
We wish to place on record our great satisfaction at the positions clearly expressed today by the representatives of the international community. We would also like to express our thanks and deep appreciation to the I wish to stress the special importance we attach to the resolution just adopted by the General Assembly on Jerusalem, which is a core issue in the settlement of the Middle East ques…
The Acting President
We have concluded this stage of our consideration of agenda item 33.
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
UNITED UNITED A NATIONS NATIONS General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/RES/51/29 11 February 1997 Fifty-first session Agenda item 33 RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY [without reference to a Main Committee (A/51/L.40 and Add.1)] 51/29. The Middle East peace process The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 50/21 of 4 December 1995, Stressing that the achievement of a comprehensive, just and lasting settlement of the Middle East conflict will constitute a significant contribution to strengthening international peace and security, Recalling the convening of the Peace Conference on the Middle East at Madrid on 30 October 1991 on the basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 and 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 and the subsequent bilateral negotiations as well as the meetings of the multilateral working groups, and noting with satisfaction the broad international support for the peace process, Noting the continuing positive participation of the United Nations as a full extraregional participant in the work of the multilateral working groups, Bearing in mind the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements1 signed by the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the representative of the Palestinian people, in Washington, D.C., on 13 September 1993 and the subsequent Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area2 signed by the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization at Cairo on 4 May 1994, 1 A/48/486-S/26560, annex. 2 A/49/180-S/1994/727, annex. 97-76759 /... A/RES/51/29 Page 2 their 29 August 1994 Agreement on the Preparatory Transfer of Powers and Responsibilities, the Protocol of Further Transfer of Powers and Responsibilities signed by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization at Cairo on 27 August 1995 and the Interim Agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip, signed by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization in Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995, Also bearing in mind the Agreement between Israel and Jordan on the Common Agenda, signed in Washington, D.C., on 14 September 1993, the Washington Declaration3 signed by Jordan and Israel on 25 July 1994 and the Treaty of Peace between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom4 of Jordan of 26 October 1994, Welcoming the Declaration of the Middle East/North Africa Economic Summit5 held at Casablanca from 30 October to 1 November 1994, the Declaration of the Middle East/North Africa Economic Summit held at Amman from 29 to 31 October 1995 and the Middle East/North Africa Economic Conference held at Cairo from 12 to 14 November 1996, Welcoming also the declared commitment of the parties concerned to overcome remaining difficulties and proceed with negotiations, 1. Welcomes the peace process started at Madrid, and supports the subsequent bilateral negotiations; 2. Stresses the importance of, and need for, achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East; 3. Expresses its full support for all the achievements of the peace process thus far, which constitute important steps in achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East; 4. Urges all parties to fulfil their obligations and to implement the agreements already reached; 5. Calls for the immediate acceleration of negotiations within the Middle East peace process on its agreed basis; 6. Stresses the need to achieve rapid progress on all tracks of the Arab-Israeli negotiations within the peace process; 7. Welcomes the results of the Conference to Support Middle East Peace, convened in Washington, D.C., on 1 October 1993, including the establishment of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee, and the subsequent work of the World Bank Consultative Group, welcomes also the appointment by the Secretary- General of the "United Nations Special Coordinator in the Occupied Territories", and urges Member States to expedite economic, financial and technical assistance to the Palestinian people during the interim period; 3 A/49/300-S/1994/939, annex. 4 A/50/73-S/1995/83, enclosure. 5 See A/49/645, annex. /... A/RES/51/29 Page 3 8. Calls upon all Member States to extend economic, financial and technical assistance to parties in the region and to render support for the peace process; 9. Considers that an active United Nations role in the Middle East peace process and in assisting in the implementation of the Declaration of Principles can make a positive contribution; 10. Encourages regional development and cooperation in areas where work has begun within the framework of the Madrid Conference. 72nd plenary meeting 4 December 1996
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/51/29.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-51-29/. Accessed .