← Votes

A/RES/58/22 GA

Jerusalem

58
Session
155
Yes
8
No
7
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/58/L.27
Adopted symbol A/RES/58/22
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Voeten Topics
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document A/RES/58/22 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/58/PV.68 Dec. 3, 2003

— Abstain (7)
✗ No (8)
Absent (21)
✓ Yes (155)
Speeches following this vote (11) may include explanations of vote
The Acting President
Draft resolution A/58/L.28 is entitled “The Syrian Golan”. A recorded vote has been requested. A recorded vote was taken. In favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, C…
The Acting President
I shall now call on those representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote on the resolutions just adopted. May I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Estremé (Argentina)
The Argentine Republic voted in favour of draft resolution A/58/L.28, on the Syrian Golan, because we believe that its essential aspect is linked to the illicit nature of the acquisition of territory by force. Article 2, paragraph 4, of the Charter of the United Nations prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of a State. That is an imperative norm of international l…
Mr. Sardenberg (Brazil)
My delegation voted in favour of draft resolution A/58/L.28, entitled “The Syrian Golan”. That vote expresses the support of the Brazilian Government for the draft resolution’s driving force: the call for all parties to resume peace talks aimed at establishing a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East. Nonetheless, regarding operative paragraph 6, I should stress the Brazilian Government’…
Mr. Carnelos (Italy)
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union. The acceding countries, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia, the associated countries, Bulgaria and Romania and the European Free Trade Association country belonging to the European Economic Area, Iceland, align themselves with this explanation of vote on the draft resolution just adopte…
Mr. Maalouf (United States of America)
The United States remains committed to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East on all tracks. Our opposition to the General Assembly draft resolution regarding the Syrian Golan (A/58/L.28) stems from the perspective the draft presents regarding the situation in the Middle East: it implies that only Israel has obligations and responsibilities to make peace. This one-sided draft…
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote on the resolution just adopted. I now give the floor to the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic.
Mr. Mekdad (Syrian Arab Republic)
My delegation would like to thank the delegations that voted in favour of draft resolution A/58/L.28 on the Syrian Arab Golan. The resolution reaffirms once again that occupation, together with the establishment of settlements and violation of the rights of peoples, must be rejected by everyone. Through today’s vote, the General Assembly has sent Israel a clear message about the need to respect …
The Acting President
I have been informed that it would be advisable to keep items 37 and 38 open in the agenda of the fifty-eighth session. Therefore, we have thus concluded this stage of our consideration of agenda items 37 and 38.
Mr. Diab (Lebanon)
I was obliged to ask for the floor to comment on what was said by the representative of the United States. We would like to express our regret regarding the irresponsible remarks of the United States representative. His remarks have, moreover, nothing to do with the question under consideration, that is, the Syrian Golan occupied by Israel since 1967, in contravention of General Assembly and Secu…
The Acting President
Before moving to the next item, I would like to make an announcement regarding the programme of work of the plenary for Friday, 5 December 2003. In addition to agenda items 28 and 40 (f) relating to Afghanistan, the General Assembly will take up, as a second item, agenda item 35, “Consequences of the Iraqi occupation of and aggression against Kuwait”. As the third item, the General Assembly will…
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/58/22 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 December 2003 Fifty-eighth session Agenda item 37 03 45423 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 3 December 2003 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/58/L.27 and Add.1)] 58/22. Jerusalem The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem, Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all subsequent resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith, Recalling further Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem, including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia, decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” and called upon those States which had established diplomatic missions in Jerusalem to withdraw such missions from the Holy City, Expressing its grave concern at any action taken by any body, governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions, Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and the protection of the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimension of the city, as foreseen in relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General,1 1. Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever; 2. Deplores the transfer by some States of their diplomatic missions to Jerusalem in violation of Security Council resolution 478 (1980), and calls once _______________ 1 A/58/278. A/RES/58/22 2 more upon those States to abide by the provisions of the relevant United Nations resolutions, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations; 3. Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its fifty-ninth session on the implementation of the present resolution. 68th plenary meeting 3 December 2003
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/58/22.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-58-22/. Accessed .