← Votes

A/RES/59/32 GA

Jerusalem

59
Session
155
Yes
7
No
15
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/59/L.39
Adopted symbol A/RES/59/32
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Voeten Topics
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document A/RES/59/32 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/59/PV.64 Dec. 1, 2004

— Abstain (15)
✗ No (7)
Absent (14)
✓ Yes (155)
Speeches following this vote (10) may include explanations of vote
The Acting President
Draft resolution A/59/L.40 is entitled “The Syrian Golan”. A recorded vote has been requested.
The Acting President
Before giving the floor to representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote on the resolutions just adopted, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Berry (Canada)
Canada supports the negotiation of a peaceful solution to all aspects of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including with regard to the Golan Heights, which has been under Israeli occupation since June 1967. We encourage the parties not to miss any opportunity to resume negotiations. However, we abstained on the vote on draft resolution A/59/L.40, in part because it points blame at only one of the parti…
Mr. Van Loosdrecht (Netherlands)
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union (EU). The candidate countries Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey and Croatia, the countries of the Stabilization and Association Process and potential candidates Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia and Montenegro, and the European Free Trade Association countries Iceland and Liechtenstein, members of the Eu…
Mr. Sardenberg (Brazil)
I should like to explain the votes of the delegations of Argentina and of Brazil on draft resolution A/59/L.40 on the Syrian Golan, which was recently adopted by the General Assembly. Argentina and Brazil voted in favour of the draft resolution because we believe that its essential aspect is linked to the illicit nature of the acquisition of territory by force. Article 2, paragraph 4, of the Ch…
Mr. Azor (Haiti)
As we said last week in the Fourth Committee, the delegation of Haiti remains dedicated to the sacrosanct principle of the self-determination of peoples. Its renews its support for the peace process in the Middle East. The delegation of Haiti believes, however, that recent political events in the region of the Middle East have given rise to a new set of circumstances — one that is likely to prom…
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote. I call on the observer of Palestine.
Mr. Al-Kidwa (State of Palestine)
It is my honour to express our great appreciation to the General Assembly and to its members — representing the entire international community — for the adoption, by an overwhelming majority, of these two important resolutions on the question of Palestine and the situation in the Middle East. These resolutions deal with mechanisms for action within the United Nations in connection with the peace…
The Acting President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 36. Programme of work
The Acting President
Before adjourning this meeting, I should like to remind members that, in addition to the items already scheduled for the afternoon of Thursday, 2 December 2004, as announced in today’s Journal, the General Assembly will resume consideration of the following agenda items to take action on draft resolutions: agenda item 12, “Report of the Economic and Social Council”, to take action on draft resol…
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/59/32 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 January 2005 Fifty-ninth session Agenda item 36 04-47818 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 1 December 2004 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/59/L.39)] 59/32. Jerusalem The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem, Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all subsequent resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith, Recalling further Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem, including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia, decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” and called upon those States which had established diplomatic missions in Jerusalem to withdraw such missions from the Holy City, Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,1 and recalling resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July 2004, Expressing its grave concern at any action taken by any body, governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions, Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and the protection of the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General,2 _______________ 1 See A/ES-10/273 and Corr.1. 2 A/59/431. A/RES/59/32 2 1. Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever; 2. Deplores the transfer by some States of their diplomatic missions to Jerusalem in violation of Security Council resolution 478 (1980), and calls once more upon those States to abide by the provisions of the relevant United Nations resolutions, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations; 3. Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. 64th plenary meeting 1 December 2004
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/59/32.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-59-32/. Accessed .