A/RES/62/84 GA
Jerusalem : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly
62
Session
160
Yes
6
No
7
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/62/L.22 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/62/84 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| Voeten Topics ⓘ | |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/62/84 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/62/PV.65
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Cambodia
-
Canada
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Moldova
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Montenegro
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Speeches following this vote (15)
The President
Draft resolution A/62/L.23 is entitled “The Syrian Golan”. There are two additional sponsors: Brunei Darussalam and Gambia. A recorded vote has been requested.
A recorded vote was taken.
In favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkin…
The President
I shall now call on those representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote on the resolutions just adopted. Before giving the floor to the speakers in explanation of vote, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I have two explanations of vote, and I will read them subsequently.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union (EU). The Candidate Countries Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the countries of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential candidates Albania, Montenegro and Serbia, as well as Ukraine, align themselves with this declaration.
The Europ…
The United States could not support resolution 62/85, entitled “The Syrian Golan”, under agenda item 17. We continue to disagree with the text, which prejudices final-status issues that must be negotiated between the parties. Considering that members of the international community recently met in Annapolis to discuss the way forward towards Israeli-Palestinian peace and a comprehensive peace in t…
My delegation, along with the overwhelming majority of Member States, voted in favour of the resolutions just adopted on the question of Palestine, in order to reaffirm its solidarity and sympathy with the Palestinian people.
Our positions with regard to the question of Palestine are well known, and therefore we wish to place on record our reservations regarding certain paragraphs of the resolut…
The Israeli delegation voted against draft resolutions A/62/L.18 to A/62/L.23, which all promote a single biased and inaccurate narrative of the situation in the Middle East and of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ritualistic recycling of these outdated draft resolutions shows that the Assembly remains utterly oblivious to the bilateral nature of the peace process and the momentum witnessed …
I should like to explain the voting of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil on resolution 62/85, adopted by the General Assembly a few moments ago.
Argentina and Brazil voted in favour of the resolution because we understand that its most important aspect concerns the unlawful nature of the acquisition of territory by force. Paragraph 4 of Article 2 of the United Nations Charter prohibits the…
Australia remains concerned about the disproportionate and duplicative allocation of Secretariat resources dedicated to Palestine, including the Division for Palestinian Rights
and the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.
The annual resolutions endorsing those work units do nothing to streamline or rationalize the Secretariat’s structure or to make its …
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union.
The European Union stresses the necessity of a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine. In that context, the European Union welcomes the joint understanding reached at the Annapolis conference between Prime Minister Olmert and President Abbas immediately to launch good faith bilateral negotiations in order to conclude a peace t…
Mr. President, allow me at the outset to thank all the countries that sponsored the draft resolutions that we have voted on today and to thank all the countries that voted in favour of those resolutions. In this connection, we again express our gratitude to the General Assembly for the fact that the number of votes in favour has increased in comparison to last year, on an average from four to eig…
The President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 17.
Reports of the Second and Fifth Committees If there is no proposal under rule 66 of the rules of procedure, I shall take it that the General Assembly decides not to discuss the two Committee reports that are before it today.
The President
Statements will therefore be limited to explanations of vote. The positions of delegations regarding the recommendations of the two Committees have been made clear in the Committees and are reflected in the relevant official records.
May I remind members that, under paragraph 7 of decision 34/401, the General Assembly agreed that when the same draft resolution is considered in a Main Committee a…
The President
The Assembly will now take a decision on the draft resolution as a whole, as orally corrected. The Second Committee adopted the draft resolution. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
The President
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (d) of agenda item 54.
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/62/84
General Assembly
Distr.: General
21 January 2008
Sixty-second session
Agenda item 17
07-46881
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 December 2007
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/62/L.22 and Add.1)]
62/84.
Jerusalem
The General Assembly,
Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its
provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem,
Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all subsequent
resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia,
determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by
Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character
and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on
Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and
void and must be rescinded forthwith,
Recalling further the Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem,
including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia,
decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” on Jerusalem,
Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International
Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the
Occupied Palestinian Territory,1 and recalling resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July 2004,
Expressing its grave concern about any action taken by any body,
governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions,
Expressing its grave concern in particular about the continuation by Israel, the
occupying Power, of illegal settlement activities, including the so-called E-1 plan,
its construction of the wall in and around East Jerusalem, its restrictions on access
to and residence in East Jerusalem, and the further isolation of the city from the rest
of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which is having a detrimental effect on the
lives of Palestinians and could prejudge a final status agreement on Jerusalem,
Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has
a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and the protection of
the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in
relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter,
_______________
1 See A/ES-10/273 and Corr.1.
A/RES/62/84
2
Having considered the report of the Secretary-General,2
1.
Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the
occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy
City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity
whatsoever, and calls upon Israel to cease all such illegal and unilateral measures;
2.
Welcomes the decision of those States that had established diplomatic
missions in Jerusalem to withdraw their missions from the city, in compliance with
Security Council resolution 478 (1980);
3.
Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of
the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the
Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed
provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as
well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all
religions and nationalities;
4.
Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its
sixty-third session on the implementation of the present resolution.
65th plenary meeting
10 December 2007
_______________
2 A/62/327.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/62/84.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-62-84/. Accessed .