A/RES/62/85 GA
The Syrian Golan
62
Session
111
Yes
6
No
56
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/62/L.23 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/62/85 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/62/85 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/62/PV.65
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bulgaria
-
Cameroon
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malta
-
Moldova
-
Monaco
-
Montenegro
-
Nauru
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Tonga
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
Vanuatu
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Cambodia
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Ghana
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Panama
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Singapore
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Speeches following this vote (14)
The President
I shall now call on those representatives who wish to speak in explanation of vote on the resolutions just adopted. Before giving the floor to the speakers in explanation of vote, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I have two explanations of vote, and I will read them subsequently.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union (EU). The Candidate Countries Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the countries of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential candidates Albania, Montenegro and Serbia, as well as Ukraine, align themselves with this declaration.
The Europ…
The United States could not support resolution 62/85, entitled “The Syrian Golan”, under agenda item 17. We continue to disagree with the text, which prejudices final-status issues that must be negotiated between the parties. Considering that members of the international community recently met in Annapolis to discuss the way forward towards Israeli-Palestinian peace and a comprehensive peace in t…
My delegation, along with the overwhelming majority of Member States, voted in favour of the resolutions just adopted on the question of Palestine, in order to reaffirm its solidarity and sympathy with the Palestinian people.
Our positions with regard to the question of Palestine are well known, and therefore we wish to place on record our reservations regarding certain paragraphs of the resolut…
The Israeli delegation voted against draft resolutions A/62/L.18 to A/62/L.23, which all promote a single biased and inaccurate narrative of the situation in the Middle East and of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ritualistic recycling of these outdated draft resolutions shows that the Assembly remains utterly oblivious to the bilateral nature of the peace process and the momentum witnessed …
I should like to explain the voting of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil on resolution 62/85, adopted by the General Assembly a few moments ago.
Argentina and Brazil voted in favour of the resolution because we understand that its most important aspect concerns the unlawful nature of the acquisition of territory by force. Paragraph 4 of Article 2 of the United Nations Charter prohibits the…
Australia remains concerned about the disproportionate and duplicative allocation of Secretariat resources dedicated to Palestine, including the Division for Palestinian Rights
and the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.
The annual resolutions endorsing those work units do nothing to streamline or rationalize the Secretariat’s structure or to make its …
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union.
The European Union stresses the necessity of a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine. In that context, the European Union welcomes the joint understanding reached at the Annapolis conference between Prime Minister Olmert and President Abbas immediately to launch good faith bilateral negotiations in order to conclude a peace t…
Mr. President, allow me at the outset to thank all the countries that sponsored the draft resolutions that we have voted on today and to thank all the countries that voted in favour of those resolutions. In this connection, we again express our gratitude to the General Assembly for the fact that the number of votes in favour has increased in comparison to last year, on an average from four to eig…
The President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 17.
Reports of the Second and Fifth Committees If there is no proposal under rule 66 of the rules of procedure, I shall take it that the General Assembly decides not to discuss the two Committee reports that are before it today.
The President
Statements will therefore be limited to explanations of vote. The positions of delegations regarding the recommendations of the two Committees have been made clear in the Committees and are reflected in the relevant official records.
May I remind members that, under paragraph 7 of decision 34/401, the General Assembly agreed that when the same draft resolution is considered in a Main Committee a…
The President
The Assembly will now take a decision on the draft resolution as a whole, as orally corrected. The Second Committee adopted the draft resolution. May I take it that the Assembly wishes to do the same?
The President
The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (d) of agenda item 54.
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/62/85
General Assembly
Distr.: General
21 January 2008
Sixty-second session
Agenda item 17
07-46887
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 December 2007
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/62/L.23 and Add.1)]
62/85.
The Syrian Golan
The General Assembly,
Having considered the item entitled “The situation in the Middle East”,
Taking note of the report of the Secretary-General,1
Recalling Security Council resolution 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981,
Reaffirming the fundamental principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition
of territory by force, in accordance with international law and the Charter of the
United Nations,
Reaffirming once more the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to
the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, 2 to the
occupied Syrian Golan,
Deeply concerned that Israel has not withdrawn from the Syrian Golan, which
has been under occupation since 1967, contrary to the relevant Security Council and
General Assembly resolutions,
Stressing the illegality of the Israeli settlement construction and other
activities in the occupied Syrian Golan since 1967,
Noting with satisfaction the convening in Madrid on 30 October 1991 of the
Peace Conference on the Middle East, on the basis of Security Council resolutions
242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 and 425 (1978) of
19 March 1978 and the formula of land for peace,
Expressing grave concern over the halt in the peace process on the Syrian
track, and expressing the hope that peace talks will soon resume from the point they
had reached,
1.
Declares that Israel has failed so far to comply with Security Council
resolution 497 (1981);
_______________
1 A/62/327.
2 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973.
A/RES/62/85
2
2.
Also declares that the Israeli decision of 14 December 1981 to impose its
laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan is null and void
and has no validity whatsoever, as confirmed by the Security Council in its
resolution 497 (1981), and calls upon Israel to rescind it;
3.
Reaffirms its determination that all relevant provisions of the Regulations
annexed to the Hague Convention of 1907,3 and the Geneva Convention relative to
the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War,2 continue to apply to the Syrian
territory occupied by Israel since 1967, and calls upon the parties thereto to respect
and ensure respect for their obligations under those instruments in all
circumstances;
4.
Determines once more that the continued occupation of the Syrian Golan
and its de facto annexation constitute a stumbling block in the way of achieving a
just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region;
5.
Calls upon Israel to resume the talks on the Syrian and Lebanese tracks
and to respect the commitments and undertakings reached during the previous talks;
6.
Demands once more that Israel withdraw from all the occupied Syrian
Golan to the line of 4 June 1967 in implementation of the relevant Security Council
resolutions;
7.
Calls upon all the parties concerned, the co-sponsors of the peace process
and the entire international community to exert all the necessary efforts to ensure
the resumption of the peace process and its success by implementing Security
Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973);
8.
Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its
sixty-third session on the implementation of the present resolution.
65th plenary meeting
10 December 2007
_______________
3 See Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and
1907 (New York, Oxford University Press, 1915).
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/62/85.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-62-85/. Accessed .