← Votes

A/RES/65/17 GA

Peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine

65
Session
166
Yes
6
No
4
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/65/L.18
Adopted symbol A/RES/65/17
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Voeten Topics
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document A/RES/65/17 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/65/PV.55 Nov. 30, 2010

— Abstain (4)
✗ No (6)
Absent (16)
✓ Yes (166)
Speeches following this vote (9) may include explanations of vote
The President
We will now consider draft resolution A/65/L.19, entitled “The Syrian Golan”. I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.
Mr. Botnaru
Since the introduction of draft resolution A/65/L.19, the Plurinational State of Bolivia and Maldives have become sponsors.
The President
The General Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/65/L.19. A recorded vote has been requested. A recorded vote was taken. In favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambo…
The President
Three Member States have requested the floor to speak in explanation of vote after the voting. Before giving the floor to those speakers, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mrs. Dunlop (Brazil)
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil on the situation in the Middle East. I wish in particular to explain the votes of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil on resolution 65/18, on the Syrian Golan, which the General Assembly has just adopted. Argentina and Brazil voted in favour of that resolution because we believe that its essential aspect is linke…
Mr. Salsabili (Islamic Republic of Iran)
I wish to put on record here in the Assembly that my delegation, in the spirit of solidarity with the Palestinian people and cause, and with other peoples under occupation, voted in favour of all the resolutions just adopted — resolutions 65/13, 65/14, 65/15 and 65/16 — under agenda item 37, “The question of Palestine”, and also resolutions 65/17 and 65/18, under agenda item 36, “The situation i…
The President
I now give the floor to the observer of Palestine.
Mr. Mansour (State of Palestine)
I would like to begin by expressing to you, Mr. President, the deepest appreciation for the patience and principled commitment to justice in our region that you have demonstrated yesterday, during the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, and today, by being with us in both the morning and afternoon meetings of the Assembly. The delegation of Palestine would like to put on …
The President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda items 36.
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/65/17 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 January 2011 Sixty-fifth session Agenda item 36 10-51356 *1051356* Please rec cle ♲ Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 30 November 2010 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.18)] 65/17. Jerusalem The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem, Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all its subsequent relevant resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith, Recalling further the Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem, including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia, decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” on Jerusalem, Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 0F1 and recalling its resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July 2004, Expressing its grave concern about any action taken by any body, governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions, Expressing its grave concern also, in particular, about the continuation by Israel, the occupying Power, of illegal settlement activities, including the so-called E-1 plan, its construction of the wall in and around East Jerusalem, its restrictions on access to and residence in East Jerusalem and the further isolation of the city from the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which are having a detrimental effect on the lives of Palestinians and could prejudge a final status agreement on Jerusalem, _______________ 1 See A/ES-10/273 and Corr.1; see also Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004, p. 136. A/RES/65/17 2 Expressing its grave concern further about the continuing Israeli demolition of Palestinian homes and the eviction of numerous Palestinian families from East Jerusalem neighbourhoods, as well as other acts of provocation and incitement, including by Israeli settlers, in the city, Expressing its concern about the Israeli excavations undertaken in the Old City of Jerusalem, including in and around religious sites, Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and in the protection of the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the situation in the Middle East, 1F2 1. Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever, and calls upon Israel to immediately cease all such illegal and unilateral measures; 2. Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities; 3. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixty-sixth session on the implementation of the present resolution. 55th plenary meeting 30 November 2010 _______________ 2 A/65/379.
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/65/17.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-65-17/. Accessed .