← Votes

A/RES/66/18 GA

Jerusalem

66
Session
164
Yes
7
No
5
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/66/L.19
Adopted symbol A/RES/66/18
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Voeten Topics
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China France
UN Document A/RES/66/18 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/66/PV.69 Nov. 30, 2011

— Abstain (5)
✗ No (7)
Absent (17)
✓ Yes (164)
Speeches following this vote (10) may include explanations of vote
The President
We turn next to draft resolution A/66/L.20, entitled “The Syrian Golan”. I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.
Mr. Botnaru
Since the submission of draft resolution A/66/L.20, in addition to those delegations listed in that document, the following countries have also become sponsors: Brunei Darussalam, Mali, Oman and Zimbabwe.
The President
The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/66/L.20. A recorded vote has been requested. A recorded vote was taken. In favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde,…
The President
Before giving the floor to speakers in explanation of vote after the voting, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Díaz Bartolomé (Argentina)
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil on the item “The situation in the Middle East”. In particular, I wish to explain the votes of the delegations of Brazil and Argentina with respect to resolution 66/19, on the Syrian Golan. Brazil and Argentina voted in favour of the resolution because they believed that its essential character is linked to the illeg…
Mr. Mostahkam (Islamic Republic of Iran)
My delegation voted in favour of the resolutions just adopted by the General Assembly under agenda items 36 and 37, on the situation in the Middle East and the question of Palestine, respectively. However, we would like to express our reservation on the parts of those resolutions that may be construed as recognition of Israel. Furthermore, where there are references in those resolutions to the i…
The President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the voting. I now call on the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic.
The President
I now give the floor to the observer of Palestine.
Mr. Mansour (State of Palestine)
The resolutions that have just been adopted by the membership are consistent with the objective of peace, the two-State solution and upholding international law. That action is a huge investment in peace, and not against it. Upholding international law is, as I have said, a major contribution to peace, unlike obstructing the law through such actions as building illegal settlements. Yesterday, on…
The President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 36.
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/66/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 January 2012 Sixty-sixth session Agenda item 36 11-45990 *1145990* Please rec cle ♲ Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 30 November 2011 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/66/L.19 and Add.1)] 66/18. Jerusalem The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem, Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all its subsequent relevant resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith, Recalling further the Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem, including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia, decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” on Jerusalem, Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 1 and recalling its resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July 2004, Expressing its grave concern about any action taken by any body, governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions, Expressing its grave concern also, in particular, about the continuation by Israel, the occupying Power, of illegal settlement activities, including the so-called E-1 plan, its construction of the wall in and around East Jerusalem, its restrictions on access to and residence in East Jerusalem and the further isolation of the city from the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which are having a detrimental effect on the lives of Palestinians and could prejudge a final status agreement on Jerusalem, _______________ 1 See A/ES-10/273 and Corr.1; see also Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004, p. 136. A/RES/66/18 2 Expressing its grave concern further about the continuing Israeli demolition of Palestinian homes, the revocation of residency rights and the eviction and displacement of numerous Palestinian families from East Jerusalem neighbourhoods, as well as other acts of provocation and incitement, including by Israeli settlers, in the city, Expressing its concern about the Israeli excavations undertaken in the Old City of Jerusalem, including in and around religious sites, Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and in the protection of the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the situation in the Middle East,2 1. Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever, and calls upon Israel to immediately cease all such illegal and unilateral measures; 2. Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities; 3. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixty-seventh session on the implementation of the present resolution. 69th plenary meeting 30 November 2011 _______________ 2 A/66/338.
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/66/18.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-66-18/. Accessed .