A/RES/66/254 GA
Intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system
66
Session
85
Yes
0
No
66
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/66/L.37 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/66/254 |
| Category | ORGANIZATIONAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/66/254 ↗ |
Vote Consensus — A/66/PV.98
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liberia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malta
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Montenegro
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Serbia
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
South Africa
-
South Sudan
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Timor-Leste
-
Turkmenistan
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
-
Afghanistan
-
Bhutan
-
Botswana
-
Cambodia
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Dominica
-
Dominican Republic
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Iraq
-
Kiribati
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Madagascar
-
Mali
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritius
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Mozambique
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Palau
-
Philippines
-
Saint Lucia
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
Eswatini
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Tuvalu
-
Vanuatu
-
Yemen
-
Algeria
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cameroon
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Grenada
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Lesotho
-
Libya
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mauritania
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Speeches following this vote (18)
The Acting President
Before giving the floor to speakers in explanation of vote, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union (EU) and its member States. The candidate countries the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland and Montenegro; the countries of the Stabilization and Association Process and potential candidates Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina; as well as the Georgia and the Republic of Moldova align themselves with this statement.
I take the …
I am speaking on behalf of the 14 States members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).
CARICOM would like to express its appreciation to the delegation of the Russian Federation for introducing this initiative and for conducting open and inclusive consultations on resolution 66/254, which was just adopted. We believe that sincere efforts were made to take the concerns of all delegations into con…
Mexico abstained in the voting on resolution 66/254 because we believe that, although it establishes a process of discussion on how we can strengthen the human rights treaty body system, we nevertheless feel that some aspects of the text should have been
revised to stipulate more clearly the parameters and competencies of the process. We sincerely thank the Russian Federation and the sponsors fo…
El Salvador regrets that there was no consensus
on resolution 66/254 on the intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on strengthening and enhancing the functioning of the human rights treaty body system, for which we voted in favour. We have closely followed this process from the beginning, and we welcome the progress it has made.
El Salvador attaches great importance to the comprehens…
Liechtenstein considers the treaty body system to be one of the most important achievements of the United Nations human rights system. We have engaged actively and constructively in efforts to strengthen that system in the framework of the multi-stakeholder process initiated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights in 2009. In that regard, we look forward to the consultations wit…
Costa Rica is genuinely committed to improving and strengthening the treaty body system. Our country is party to 10 instruments that establish bodies to oversee their implementation. We support intergovernmental discussions to strengthen those bodies, with the broad participation of their own experts, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, civil society, national hum…
Uruguay voted in favour of resolution 66/254, which establishes an intergovernmental process at the General Assembly aimed at strengthening and improving the effective functioning of human rights treaty bodies.
My delegation participated actively and constructively in the negotiations. We put forward alternative formulas to address those points where there were differences. With a view towards c…
The delegation of Argentina voted in favor of resolution 66/254 because we believe that it is important to have an in-depth discussion on the strengthening of human rights treaty bodies. One of the most important tools
of the international system for the promotion and protection of human rights is facing various challenges because of the increasing demands to which it is being subjected. We also…
Canada has been a champion of the international system for the protection and promotion of human rights since its inception with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Canada is party to the seven core international human rights instruments. As a State party to those instruments, Canada is committed to the principles of the treaty body system, in particular the central role played by the trea…
Norway sees the work of the treaty bodies as a cornerstone of the international system for monitoring States’ compliance with human rights obligations. We support all efforts to streamline the work of the treaty bodies to increase the efficiency, accessibility and impact of the treaty body system.
We have engaged actively and constructively in efforts to strengthen the effectiveness and efficien…
Chile abstained in the voting that has just taken place on resolution 66/254. Chile recognizes the efforts of the sponsors, and especially of the Russian Federation, in attempting to accommodate the concerns and proposals of other Member States. However, in the opinion of my delegation, those efforts were not sufficient to eliminate the concerns of the delegations of Chile and other States, which…
Guatemala is convinced of the need to strengthen the system of bodies created under human rights treaties. We would like to thank the High Commissioner for Human Rights for her efforts to help Member States in this effort as part of her mandate.
We view this process as one of strengthening, but not one of substantial reform. Guatemala abstained in the voting on resolution 66/254. In addition to …
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote following the voting.
We shall now hear general statements.
China supports the adoption of resolution 66/254, entitled “Intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system. China wishes to reiterate its views on reforming the human rights treaty bodies as follows.
First, States parties are decreed as human rights treaty bodies, shouldering the primary responsibi…
Indonesia conveys its appreciation to the President of the General Assembly for convening this meeting to adopt resolution 66/254,
entitled “Intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system”. I particularly wish to commend the excellent facilitation by the delegation of the Russian Federation, which …
Belarus sponsored resolution 66/254 and highly appreciates the initiative of the Russian Federation to strengthen the human rights treaty body system. The initiative is timely and relevant. Strengthening the human rights treaty
body system of the United Nations and enhancing its activities is a key component of overall United Nations reform. We are convinced that an important factor in successfu…
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote.
I shall now make a few comments on behalf of the presidency.
“The General Assembly has adopted this morning resolution 66/254, entitled ‘Intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system’.
(spoke in English)
“According to Article 1 of the Chart…
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/66/254
General Assembly
Distr.: General
15 May 2012
Sixty-sixth session
Agenda item 124
11-47406
*1147406*
Please rec cle ♲
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 February 2012
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/66/L.37 and Add.1)]
66/254. Intergovernmental process of the General Assembly on
strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning
of the human rights treaty body system
The General Assembly,
Reaffirming the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
and recalling the Universal Declaration of Human Rights1 and relevant international
human rights instruments,
Recalling the obligations of States parties under international human rights
treaties, including those relevant to the functioning of the human rights treaty
bodies,
Recalling also Economic and Social Council resolution 1985/17 of 28 May
1985,
Reaffirming that the full and effective implementation of international human
rights instruments by States parties is of major importance to the efforts of the
United Nations to promote universal respect for and observance of human rights and
fundamental freedoms, and that the effective functioning of the human rights treaty
body system is indispensable for the full and effective implementation of such
instruments,
Recognizing the important, valuable and unique role and contribution of each
of the human rights treaty bodies to the promotion and protection of human rights
and fundamental freedoms, including through examination of the progress made by
States parties to respective human rights treaties in fulfilling their relevant
obligations and by providing recommendations to such States on their
implementation,
Reaffirming the importance of the independence of the human rights treaty
bodies,
_______________
1 Resolution 217 A (III).
A/RES/66/254
2
Recognizing the importance of providing, under the existing procedures of the
General Assembly, adequate funding to the human rights treaty body system from
the regular budget of the United Nations,
Recognizing also the importance of continued efforts to improve the efficiency
of the working methods of the human rights treaty body system,
Noting the reports of the Secretary-General on measures to improve further the
effectiveness, harmonization and reform of the human rights treaty body system,2
Noting with appreciation the initiative and efforts of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights, in the form of a multi-stakeholder consultation
approach for reflecting on how to streamline and strengthen the treaty body system,
Noting that the multi-stakeholder approach consisted of a number of meetings
involving representatives of Member States, treaty bodies, national human rights
institutions, non-governmental organizations and academia, including events hosted
by a number of Member States,3
Noting also that the High Commissioner for Human Rights has announced
upcoming consultations with Member States in New York in April 2012 within the
framework of her efforts and in line with her intention to prepare a report compiling
relevant proposals made during the reflection process,
1.
Requests the President of the General Assembly to launch, within the
framework of the Assembly, an open-ended intergovernmental process, no earlier
than in April 2012, to conduct open, transparent and inclusive negotiations on how
to strengthen and enhance the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body
system;
2.
Also requests the President of the General Assembly, in this regard, to
appoint two co-facilitators, in accordance with established procedures and practices,
to assist him in this process;
3.
Decides that, in its deliberations, the aforementioned open-ended
intergovernmental process shall take into consideration the relevant proposals on
strengthening and enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty
body system, including those contained in the reports of the Secretary-General2 and
the compilation report to be prepared by the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights, and in this regard invites the High Commissioner to present the
compilation report to the General Assembly no later than June 2012;
4.
Reaffirms that the deliberations in the framework of the open-ended
intergovernmental process shall be open to all States Members of the United
Nations, observer States, relevant intergovernmental organizations and relevant
United Nations bodies;
5.
Requests the President of the General Assembly to establish appropriate
channels of communication with the President of the Human Rights Council
regarding the open-ended intergovernmental process on strengthening and
enhancing the effective functioning of the human rights treaty body system referred
to in paragraph 1 above;
_______________
2 A/66/344 and A/HRC/19/28.
3 Dublin (November 2009 and 2011), Marrakech, Morocco (June 2010), Poznan, Poland (September
2010), Seoul (April 2011), Sion, Switzerland (May 2011), Pretoria (June 2011), Lucerne, Switzerland
(October 2011), Geneva (October and November 2011 and February 2012).
A/RES/66/254
3
6.
Also requests the President of the General Assembly to work out separate
informal arrangements, after consultation with Member States, that would allow the
open-ended intergovernmental process to benefit from the inputs and expertise of
the human rights treaty bodies, national human rights institutions and relevant
non-governmental organizations, bearing in mind the intergovernmental nature of
the process referred to in paragraph 1 above;
7.
Requests
the
Secretary-General
to
provide
the
open-ended
intergovernmental process with all necessary support from within existing resources
for the duration of its mandate;
8.
Requests the President of the General Assembly to report by the end of
its sixty-sixth session on the deliberations and recommendations of the open-ended
intergovernmental process for further consideration by the Assembly, including
consideration of a possible extension of the process.
98th plenary meeting
23 February 2012
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/66/254.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-66-254/. Accessed .