A/RES/66/257 GA
Progress towards an accountability system in the United Nations Secretariat : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly
66
Session
98
Yes
48
No
4
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/C.5/66/L.30 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/66/257 |
| Category | ORGANIZATIONAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/66/257 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/66/PV.104
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Monaco
-
Montenegro
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
North Macedonia
-
Türkiye
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
-
Armenia
-
Azerbaijan
-
Belize
-
Cameroon
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Dominica
-
Fiji
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Grenada
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Israel
-
Kiribati
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Malawi
-
Mali
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Somalia
-
South Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Eswatini
-
Timor-Leste
-
Tonga
-
Tuvalu
-
Vanuatu
-
Yemen
-
Afghanistan
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cambodia
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
China
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Gabon
-
Ghana
-
Guatemala
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Kuwait
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lebanon
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Qatar
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
South Africa
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/66/257
General Assembly
Distr.: General
12 April 2012
Sixty-sixth session
Agenda item 132
11-47424
*1147424*
Please rec cle ♲
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 April 2012
[on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/66/638/Add.1)]
66/257. Progress towards an accountability system
in the United Nations Secretariat
The General Assembly,
I
Progress towards an accountability system
in the United Nations Secretariat
Recalling its resolutions 59/272 of 23 December 2004 and 60/254 of 8 May
2006, section I of its resolution 60/260 of 8 May 2006 and its resolutions 60/283 of
7 July 2006, 61/245 of 22 December 2006, 63/276 of 7 April 2009 and 64/259 of
29 March 2010,
Reaffirming its commitment to strengthening accountability in the United
Nations Secretariat and the accountability of the Secretary-General for the
performance of the Secretariat to all Member States,
Stressing that accountability is a central pillar of effective and efficient
management that requires attention and strong commitment at the highest level of
the Secretariat,
Recognizing and reaffirming the important role of the oversight bodies in the
development of an accountability system that is relevant to the United Nations,
Acknowledging that the development of an accountability system in the United
Nations Secretariat is a complex process,
Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on progress towards an
accountability system in the United Nations Secretariat1 and the related report of the
Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2
Having also considered the reports of the Joint Inspection Unit entitled
“Accountability frameworks in the United Nations system”,3 “Transparency in the
_______________
1 A/66/692.
2 A/66/738.
3 See A/66/710.
A/RES/66/257
2
selection and appointment of senior managers in the United Nations Secretariat”4
and “Review of enterprise risk management in the United Nations system:
benchmarking framework”, 5 as well as the notes by the Secretary-General
transmitting his comments and those of the United Nations System Chief Executives
Board for Coordination,6
1.
Takes note of the report of the Secretary-General;1
2.
Endorses the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report
of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions;2
3.
Stresses the importance of promoting a culture of accountability, results-
based management, enterprise risk management and internal controls at all levels in
the Secretariat through the continued leadership and commitment of senior
managers, and reiterates its request that the Secretary-General take appropriate
measures to that end, including, inter alia, the training of relevant staff;
4.
Recalls paragraph 5 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 and requests the Secretary-General to
provide more details on accountability measures and their application, which are
necessary for reporting purposes and for the day-to-day management of the
implementation of the accountability framework, including monitoring progress,
evaluating results and taking corrective action, as required;
5.
Also recalls paragraph 6 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 and requests the Secretary-General to
improve the content of future progress reports on the implementation of the
accountability framework by providing more complete and transparent information
that would enable a clear understanding of the principles and mechanisms of the
accountability measures implemented or envisaged, including an analysis of the
impact of their application on strengthening accountability, with key performance
indicators and supporting statistical information to substantiate results;
6.
Requests the Secretary-General to develop, as a priority, a clearly defined
and well-documented plan that includes clear objectives, responsibilities and a
timeline for accomplishing the specific actions he is undertaking to strengthen
accountability in response to the present resolution and resolution 64/259;
7.
Recalls paragraph 11 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 and requests the Secretary-General to
submit, for its consideration, an annual report on progress made towards the
implementation of the accountability framework;
8.
Decides to continue to consider this matter under the same agenda item
at the first part of its resumed sixty-seventh session;
Definition of accountability and roles and responsibilities
9.
Requests the Secretary-General to continue to draw on lessons learned,
experience and expertise from the United Nations programmes and funds and other
United Nations entities when further developing the accountability system of the
United Nations Secretariat;
_______________
4 See A/66/380.
5 See A/65/788.
6 A/66/710/Add.1, A/66/380/Add.1 and A/65/788/Add.1.
A/RES/66/257
3
Promoting a culture of accountability
10. Acknowledges that strengthening accountability remains a work in
progress, that some elements of the accountability framework have been established
and that much work needs to be done in order to build an effective system of
accountability in the United Nations and to improve the management of its
operations;
11. Welcomes the report of the Joint Inspection Unit entitled “Accountability
frameworks in the United Nations system”;3
Delegation of authority
12. Notes that the information contained in the report of the Secretary-
General is insufficient to enable a clear understanding either of the comprehensive
review process or of the system of delegation of authority, recalls paragraph 21 of
resolution 64/259 and paragraph 36 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions to the General Assembly at its sixty-fourth
session on an accountability system, 7 and stresses the need for the Secretary-
General to urgently address the continued deficiencies in the current delegation of
authority system through the promulgation of well-defined roles and responsibilities
of individuals at all levels to whom authority is delegated, systemic reporting
mechanisms on monitoring and exercise of delegated authority and actions to be
taken in cases of mismanagement or abuse of authority;
Implementation of the recommendations of oversight bodies
13. Emphasizes the importance of the full and timely implementation of the
recommendations of oversight bodies, and stresses in this regard the role of the
Management Committee in monitoring and ensuring that accepted recommendations
are followed up and implemented in a timely manner, and the need for transparency
in the work of the Committee;
14. Recalls paragraph 24 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 in particular the issues raised by the
Board of Auditors, and requests the Secretary-General to further strengthen
consultation and cooperation with the oversight bodies as he pursues the
implementation of the accountability framework;
Personal and institutional accountability
15. Emphasizes the importance of establishing and fully implementing real,
effective and efficient mechanisms that foster institutional and personal
accountability at all levels;
16. Notes with concern that there is little evidence that senior managers’
compacts have had any real impact on enhancing accountability, and requests the
Secretary-General, in this regard, to pursue concrete measures to ensure that the
compact system becomes a powerful instrument of the accountability system;
17. Encourages the Secretary-General to pursue his efforts to improve the
content and assessment methods of the compact system by establishing connections
between individual workplans, departmental workplans, budget fascicles and senior
_______________
7 A/64/683 and Corr.1.
A/RES/66/257
4
managers’ compacts, as well as by including in the senior managers’ compacts the
final assessment of their performance;
18. Recalls paragraph 30 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions2 on the mismanagement of the Umoja
project, and requests the Secretary-General to fully implement the governance
structure of the project, as mandated by the General Assembly in its resolution
66/246 of 24 December 2011, as a matter of priority;
19. Requests the Secretary-General to further develop and take appropriate
measures to hold staff accountable for mismanagement and wrongful or improper
decisions and to strengthen efforts to increase recovery actions against those
convicted of fraud in the Organization;
Reform of the performance appraisal system
20. Recalls paragraph 39 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 and requests the Secretary-General to
establish a more robust system of sanctions to address the underperformance of staff
in order to create a culture of accountability;
21. Requests the Secretary-General to include in the report requested in
paragraph 7 above information on progress in the establishment of the rewards and
recognition framework of the United Nations Secretariat;
Selection and appointment of senior managers
22. Welcomes the report of the Joint Inspection Unit entitled “Transparency
in the selection and appointment of senior managers in the United Nations
Secretariat”;4
Enterprise risk management and internal control framework
23. Welcomes the progress made by the Secretary-General towards the
development of the enterprise risk management framework, stresses that there is a
need to clearly distinguish between the respective roles and responsibilities of the
governing bodies and management, and in this regard requests the Secretary-
General to review his enterprise risk management policy, focusing on the role and
responsibilities of the Secretariat in the management of the risks of its operations;
24. Stresses that the General Assembly is responsible for determining the risk
tolerance of the Organization, and expresses its concern over the lack of detailed
analysis by the Secretary-General with regard to the key risk areas of the United
Nations;
25. Welcomes the report of the Joint Inspection Unit entitled “Review of
enterprise risk management in the United Nations system: benchmarking
framework”;5
Concrete measures to prevent potential conflicts of interest
26. Recalls paragraph 54 of the report of the Advisory Committee on
Administrative and Budgetary Questions,2 and requests the Secretary-General to
continue to ensure that concrete measures are taken to prevent potential conflicts of
interest in all the activities related to the administrative and budgetary aspects of the
functioning of the United Nations, including the current process governing all
A/RES/66/257
5
procurement, staff recruitment and promotion and other relevant processes, and to
report thereon;
Performance reporting, implementation of the results-based management
framework and results-based management information system
27. Stresses that results-based management and performance reporting are
essential pillars of a comprehensive accountability framework, and regrets that the
report of the Secretary-General does not address all the areas identified by the
General Assembly in resolution 64/259, notably results-based management and
performance reporting;
28. Requests the Secretary-General to promote a culture of self-evaluation
throughout the Organization, to mainstream the use of relevant monitoring and
evaluation tools in programme planning and implementation, to provide staff with
adequate training, as appropriate and within existing resources, and to include in his
report on the implementation of the present resolution information on measures
taken in this regard;
29. Also requests the Secretary-General to continue to take appropriate
measures to accelerate the implementation of results-based management and to
include, inter alia, in his next report concrete measures on how the Organization will
shift the focus of its accountability from the delivery of outputs to the delivery of
results;
II
Change management initiatives
Reaffirming its determination to strengthen further the role, capacity,
effectiveness and efficiency of the United Nations, and thus improve its
performance, in order to realize the full potential of the Organization, in accordance
with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and to
respond more effectively to the needs of Member States and existing and new global
challenges facing the United Nations in the twenty-first century,
Recalling its resolutions 41/213 of 19 December 1986, 42/211 of 21 December
1987, 49/233 A of 23 December 1994, 58/269 of 23 December 2003 and 60/260 of
8 May 2006,
Recalling also Article 2, paragraph 1, and Articles 17, 18, 97 and 100 of the
Charter,
Reaffirming the rules of procedure of the General Assembly,
Stressing the intergovernmental, multilateral and international character of the
United Nations,
1.
Reaffirms the role of the General Assembly and its relevant
intergovernmental and expert bodies, within their respective mandates, in planning,
programming, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation;
2.
Also reaffirms that the Fifth Committee is the appropriate Main
Committee of the General Assembly entrusted with responsibilities for
administrative and budgetary matters, and reaffirms the role of the Fifth Committee
in carrying out a thorough analysis and in approving human and financial resources
and policies, with a view to ensuring full, effective and efficient implementation of
A/RES/66/257
6
all mandated programmes and activities and the implementation of policies in this
regard;
3.
Further reaffirms its role with regard to the structure of the Secretariat,
and stresses that proposals to amend the overall departmental structure, as well as
the format of the programme budget and the biennial programme plan, are subject to
review and prior approval by the General Assembly;
4.
Reaffirms the Regulations and Rules Governing Programme Planning,
the Programme Aspects of the Budget, the Monitoring of Implementation and the
Methods of Evaluation 8 and the Financial Regulations and Rules of the United
Nations;9
5.
Stresses the need for the General Assembly to participate in the budget
preparation process, from its early stages and throughout the process;
6.
Also stresses that setting the priorities of the United Nations and
formulating policies are the prerogative of the Member States, as reflected in
legislative decisions;
7.
Further stresses, as one of the essential components of accountability,
the importance of compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, its resolutions
and the regulations and rules;
8.
Notes the change management initiative of the Secretary-General and the
recommendations contained in the report of the Change Management Team
submitted to the Secretary-General, and requests him, in accordance with the
provisions of paragraphs 1 to 7 above, to submit to the General Assembly for its
consideration and prior approval any proposals or measures related to the
implementation of the recommendations contained in paragraphs 8, 11, 15, 16 to 18,
27, 28, 30, 34, 37 to 41, 43 and 49 to 61 of that report.
104th plenary meeting
9 April 2012
_______________
8 ST/SGB/2000/8.
9 ST/SGB/2003/7 and Amend.1.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/66/257.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-66-257/. Accessed .