A/RES/69/24 GA
Jerusalem : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly
69
Session
144
Yes
6
No
10
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/69/L.25 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/69/24 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| Voeten Topics ⓘ | |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/69/24 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/69/PV.61
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cabo Verde
-
Chad
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Dominica
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Haiti
-
Kenya
-
Kiribati
-
Lesotho
-
Malawi
-
Mauritania
-
Nauru
-
Republic of Korea
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
South Sudan
-
Eswatini
-
North Macedonia
-
Turkmenistan
-
Uganda
-
Zambia
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Algeria
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Barbados
-
Belarus
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Cambodia
-
Chile
-
Colombia
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lebanon
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mali
-
Malta
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mongolia
-
Montenegro
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Russian Federation
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Tajikistan
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Türkiye
-
Tuvalu
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Uzbekistan
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zimbabwe
Speeches following this vote (17)
The Acting President
We now turn to draft resolution A/69/L.26.
I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.
Mr. Botnaru
I should like to announce that, since the submission of the draft resolution and in addition to those delegations already listed in the draft document, the following countries have become sponsors of A/69/L.26: the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Brunei Darussalam and the Niger.
The Acting President
Before giving the floor to the speakers in explanation of vote, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil to explain our votes, as we have done in previous years, on the resolution on the Syrian Golan (resolution 69/25), just adopted by the General Assembly. Brazil and Argentina voted in favour of the resolution because we believe that its essential character is linked to the illegality of the acquisition of territory by …
The Acting President
We have heard the only speaker in explanation of vote.
I call on the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic for a statement.
The Acting President
I call on the observer of the Observer State of Palestine for a statement.
Allow me at the beginning to express our gratitude to the five members that sponsored our resolutions, those that introduced them and all the countries that voted in favour. We believe that this sends a very strong message from the General Assembly and from the vast majority of Member States in favour of justice, peace and the two- State solution.
In that connection, we have the highest respect …
The Acting President
Several representatives have asked to speak in exercise of the right of reply. May I remind members that statements in the exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to five minutes for the second intervention and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I speak in exercise of the right of reply to certain statements that have been made during this debate.
Israel is not what is wrong in the Middle East. Israel is what is right in the Middle East. So let us talk about the real problems in our region when we speak about the situation in the Middle East.
The representative of Lebanon stood in this Hall yesterday (see A/69/PV.59) and accused Israel…
I would like to reply to the reference just made to my country by the representative of the Israeli regime.
In the name of clarifying the real problems of the region, the representative of the Israeli regime has tried to divert attention from what is the real problem of the region, namely, the criminal policies and abhorrent atrocities of his regime. The illegal Israeli policies and practices ag…
I thank you, Sir, for giving me the floor to respond to the claims and allegations made by the representative of the Israeli occupation forces.
Having listened to all the condemnation of Israeli policies of aggression and having seen the great support for the resolutions we have just adopted, we believe that it is clear that the representative of the occupation authorities could not find a way t…
I too am exercising our right of reply in response to the comments just made by the representative of Israel.
Pakistan is at the forefront of fighting terrorism. We are fighting violent extremism. The remarks made by the representative of Israel are therefore gratuitous. They are an attempt to divert the attention of the international community and the General Assembly from the real issue that w…
I regret that I have to take the floor again. I will be brief.
In response to the Iranian statement that we have just heard, I have to say that the statement by the Deputy Secretary-General of Hizbullah, Naeem Kassem, that I quoted just now was taken from Iranian media and is in line with other statements made earlier over the weekend by high-ranking officials of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard …
It seems that the representative of the occupation authorities cannot refrain from repeating those fictional figures of his. He was disturbed, it seems, by my references to the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law. That is no wonder, since it seems that Israel has never heard of those principles and doctrines; if it had, we would not be in the Hall discussing Isra…
I am again taking the floor in exercise of the right of reply to the remarks made by the representative of the Israeli regime.
It is regrettable that the representative of a regime that is the main sponsor of State terrorism criticizes others who give moral support to freedom fighters and those who fight against the foreign occupation of their homeland. It is obvious that making baseless allegat…
The Acting President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 35.
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/69/24
General Assembly
Distr.: General
10 November 2014
Sixty-ninth session
Agenda item 35
14-65718 (E)
*1465718*
Please recycle
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 November 2014
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/69/L.25 and Add.1)]
69/24.
Jerusalem
The General Assembly,
Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its
provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem,
Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all its
subsequent relevant resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in
which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and
actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to
alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the
so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the
capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith,
Recalling further the Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem,
including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia,
decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” on Jerusalem,
Recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International
Court of Justice on the legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the
Occupied Palestinian Territory, 1 and recalling its resolution ES-10/15 of 20 July
2004,
Expressing its grave concern about any action taken by any body,
governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions,
Expressing its grave concern also, in particular, about the continuation by
Israel, the occupying Power, of illegal settlement activities, including provocations
regarding the so-called E-1 plan, its construction of the wall in and around East
Jerusalem, its restrictions on Palestinian access to and residence in East Jerusalem
and the further isolation of the city from the rest of the Occupied Palestinian
Territory, which are having a detrimental effect on the lives of Palestinians and
could prejudge a final status agreement on Jerusalem,
Expressing its grave concern further about the continuing Israeli demolition of
Palestinian homes, the revocation of residency rights and the eviction and
_______________
1 See A/ES-10/273 and Corr.1.
A/RES/69/24
Jerusalem
2/2
displacement
of
numerous
Palestinian
families
from
East
Jerusalem
neighbourhoods, including Bedouin families, as well as other acts of provocation
and incitement, including by Israeli settlers, in the city, including desecration of
mosques and churches,
Expressing its concern about the Israeli excavations undertaken in the Old City
of Jerusalem, including in and around religious sites,
Reaffirming that the international community, through the United Nations, has
a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and in the protection of
the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in
relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter,
Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the situation in the
Middle East,2
1.
Reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the
occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy
City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity
whatsoever, and calls upon Israel to immediately cease all such illegal and unilateral
measures;
2.
Stresses that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of
the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the
Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed
provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as
well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by people of all
religions and nationalities;
3.
Also stresses the need for the parties to observe calm and restraint and to
refrain from provocative actions, incitement and inflammatory rhetoric, especially
in areas of religious and cultural sensitivity, and expresses its grave concern in
particular about the recent series of negative incidents in East Jerusalem;
4.
Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its
seventieth session on the implementation of the present resolution.
61st plenary meeting
25 November 2014
_______________
2 A/69/341.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/69/24.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-69-24/. Accessed .