← Votes

A/RES/69/25 GA

The Syrian Golan : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly

69
Session
99
Yes
6
No
57
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/69/L.26
Adopted symbol A/RES/69/25
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom ~ China France ~
UN Document A/RES/69/25 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/69/PV.61 Nov. 25, 2014

— Abstain (58)
✗ No (6)
Absent (31)
✓ Yes (99)
Speeches following this vote (14) may include explanations of vote
The Acting President
Before giving the floor to the speakers in explanation of vote, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Lopes (Brazil)
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the delegations of Argentina and Brazil to explain our votes, as we have done in previous years, on the resolution on the Syrian Golan (resolution 69/25), just adopted by the General Assembly. Brazil and Argentina voted in favour of the resolution because we believe that its essential character is linked to the illegality of the acquisition of territory by …
The Acting President
We have heard the only speaker in explanation of vote. I call on the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic for a statement.
The Acting President
I call on the observer of the Observer State of Palestine for a statement.
Mr. Mansour (State of Palestine)
Allow me at the beginning to express our gratitude to the five members that sponsored our resolutions, those that introduced them and all the countries that voted in favour. We believe that this sends a very strong message from the General Assembly and from the vast majority of Member States in favour of justice, peace and the two- State solution. In that connection, we have the highest respect …
The Acting President
Several representatives have asked to speak in exercise of the right of reply. May I remind members that statements in the exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to five minutes for the second intervention and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Nitzan (Israel)
I speak in exercise of the right of reply to certain statements that have been made during this debate. Israel is not what is wrong in the Middle East. Israel is what is right in the Middle East. So let us talk about the real problems in our region when we speak about the situation in the Middle East. The representative of Lebanon stood in this Hall yesterday (see A/69/PV.59) and accused Israel…
Mr. Dibaei (Islamic Republic of Iran)
I would like to reply to the reference just made to my country by the representative of the Israeli regime. In the name of clarifying the real problems of the region, the representative of the Israeli regime has tried to divert attention from what is the real problem of the region, namely, the criminal policies and abhorrent atrocities of his regime. The illegal Israeli policies and practices ag…
Mr. Hamed (Syrian Arab Republic)
I thank you, Sir, for giving me the floor to respond to the claims and allegations made by the representative of the Israeli occupation forces. Having listened to all the condemnation of Israeli policies of aggression and having seen the great support for the resolutions we have just adopted, we believe that it is clear that the representative of the occupation authorities could not find a way t…
Mr. Munir (Pakistan)
I too am exercising our right of reply in response to the comments just made by the representative of Israel. Pakistan is at the forefront of fighting terrorism. We are fighting violent extremism. The remarks made by the representative of Israel are therefore gratuitous. They are an attempt to divert the attention of the international community and the General Assembly from the real issue that w…
Mr. Nitzan (Israel)
I regret that I have to take the floor again. I will be brief. In response to the Iranian statement that we have just heard, I have to say that the statement by the Deputy Secretary-General of Hizbullah, Naeem Kassem, that I quoted just now was taken from Iranian media and is in line with other statements made earlier over the weekend by high-ranking officials of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard …
Mr. Hamed (Syrian Arab Republic)
It seems that the representative of the occupation authorities cannot refrain from repeating those fictional figures of his. He was disturbed, it seems, by my references to the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law. That is no wonder, since it seems that Israel has never heard of those principles and doctrines; if it had, we would not be in the Hall discussing Isra…
Mr. Dibaei (Islamic Republic of Iran)
I am again taking the floor in exercise of the right of reply to the remarks made by the representative of the Israeli regime. It is regrettable that the representative of a regime that is the main sponsor of State terrorism criticizes others who give moral support to freedom fighters and those who fight against the foreign occupation of their homeland. It is obvious that making baseless allegat…
The Acting President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 35.
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/69/25 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 December 2014 Sixty-ninth session Agenda item 35 14-65721 (E) *1465721* Please recycle Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 November 2014 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/69/L.26 and Add.1)] 69/25. The Syrian Golan The General Assembly, Having considered the item entitled “The situation in the Middle East”, Taking note of the report of the Secretary-General on the situation in the Middle East,1 Recalling Security Council resolution 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981, Reaffirming the fundamental principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations, Reaffirming once more the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, 2 to the occupied Syrian Golan, Deeply concerned that Israel has not withdrawn from the Syrian Golan, which has been under occupation since 1967, contrary to the relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, Stressing the illegality of the Israeli settlement construction and other activities in the occupied Syrian Golan since 1967, Noting with satisfaction the convening in Madrid on 30 October 1991 of the Peace Conference on the Middle East, on the basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 and 425 (1978) of 19 March 1978 and the formula of land for peace, Expressing grave concern over the halt in the peace process on the Syrian track, and expressing the hope that peace talks will soon resume from the point they had reached, 1. Declares that Israel has failed so far to comply with Security Council resolution 497 (1981); _______________ 1 A/69/341. 2 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 75, No. 973. A/RES/69/25 The Syrian Golan 2/2 2. Also declares that the Israeli decision of 14 December 1981 to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan is null and void and has no validity whatsoever, as confirmed by the Security Council in its resolution 497 (1981), and calls upon Israel to rescind it; 3. Reaffirms its determination that all relevant provisions of the Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention of 1907, and the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,2 continue to apply to the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since 1967, and calls upon the parties thereto to respect and ensure respect for their obligations under those instruments in all circumstances; 4. Determines once more that the continued occupation of the Syrian Golan and its de facto annexation constitute a stumbling block in the way of achieving a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region; 5. Calls upon Israel to resume the talks on the Syrian and Lebanese tracks and to respect the commitments and undertakings reached during the previous talks; 6. Demands once more that Israel withdraw from all the occupied Syrian Golan to the line of 4 June 1967 in implementation of the relevant Security Council resolutions; 7. Calls upon all the parties concerned, the co-sponsors of the peace process and the entire international community to exert all the necessary efforts to ensure the resumption of the peace process and its success by implementing Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973); 8. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its seventieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. 61st plenary meeting 25 November 2014
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/69/25.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-69-25/. Accessed .