← Votes

A/RES/73/194 GA

Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov

73
Session
66
Yes
19
No
72
Abstentions
Draft symbol A/73/L.47
Adopted symbol A/RES/73/194
Category POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS
Sponsors (4)
P5 Positions
Russia United States United Kingdom China ~ France
UN Document A/RES/73/194 ↗

Vote Recorded VoteA/73/PV.56 Dec. 17, 2018

— Abstain (72)
✗ No (19)
Absent (36)
✓ Yes (66)
Speeches following this vote (11) may include explanations of vote
The Acting President
Before giving the floor for explanations of vote on the resolution just adopted, may I remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
Mr. Polyanskiy (Russian Federation)
We regret the results of the vote that has just been held, but we are encouraged by the fact that many States abstained and want nothing to do with this pernicious Ukrainian enterprise. However, we have to conclude that today we have seen the formation of a group of Member States, mainly members of NATO and the European Union (EU), that through both their action and lack of action have encouraged…
Mr. Tozik (Belarus)
Belarus has carefully followed the events in Ukraine and the developments in the situation in the eastern region of our neighbour to the south. Peace and harmony in Ukraine are of vital importance to Belarus. A peaceful settlement of the conflict, an end to the violence, the prevention of armed clashes and the compliance of the parties to the Minsk agreements remain the only true basis for effect…
Mr. Margaryan (Armenia)
We are following with deep concern the increasing tensions related to Crimea and the developments in the area of the Black Sea. Armenia shares a rich history of friendship with the peoples of Russia and Ukraine. We hope that the parties concerned will exercise the utmost restraint to de-escalate the situation in order to open the way for negotiations. We are confident that the solution to the cri…
Mr. Kyslytsya (Ukraine)
Since the Russian representative has problems understanding English, I will say a few words in Russian. (spoke in Russian) It seems that everyone in this Hall — the more than 40 sponsors and almost 70 countries supporting resolution 73/194 — should be ashamed. Only the Russian Federation is not ashamed. Throughout its almost 28 years as a member of the Security Council, the Russian Federation h…
Mr. Gafoor (Singapore)
I am taking the floor to explain my delegation’s vote in favour of both the amendment contained in document A/73/L.68 and resolution 73/194. As a small country, Singapore is deeply committed to multilateralism and respect for international law. Singapore opposes the annexation of any country or territory, as it is a clear violation of international law. We object to any unprovoked invasion of a s…
Mr. Chang (Republic of Korea)
My delegation voted against the amendment contained in document A/73/L.68 and abstained in the voting on resolution 73/194. While emphasizing the importance of peaceful resolution through dialogue, my delegation would like to note that today’s vote does not constitute a departure from its position of 27 March 2014, when it voted in favour of resolution 68/262 (see A/68/PV.80), reaffirming its co…
Ms. Krisnamurthi (Indonesia)
Let me start by reaffirming our basic principle to respect and support the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. Indonesia’s principled and consistent position respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of States and is a fundamental principle of relations among nations. Indonesia is therefore opposed to any action of annexation against any sovere…
The Acting President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the voting. I now give the floor to the observer of the European Union.
Mr. Dabouis
The candidate countries Turkey, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania; the European Free Trade Association country Liechtenstein, member of the European Economic Area; as well as Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia align themselves with this statement. The European Union (EU) reaffirms its full support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integri…
The Acting President
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (a) of agenda item 34.
Full text of resolution OCR extract — may contain errors
United Nations A/RES/73/194 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 January 2019 18-22290 (E) 250119 *1822290* Seventy-third session Agenda item 34 (a) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 17 December 2018 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/73/L.47 and A/73/L.47/Add.1)] 73/194. Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov The General Assembly, Recalling the Charter of the United Nations, which states, inter alia, that all Members of the United Nations shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, Recalling also its resolution 68/262 of 27 March 2014 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine, in which it affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders, Recalling further its resolutions 71/205 and 72/190 on the situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, of 19 December 2016 and 19 December 2017, respectively, Condemning the ongoing temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine, namely, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (hereinafter referred to as “Crimea”), by the Russian Federation, and reaffirming the non-recognition of its annexation, Recalling that the temporary occupation of Crimea and the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine by the Russian Federation is in contravention of commitments made under the Memorandum on Security Assurances in Connection with Ukraine’s Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Budapest Memorandum) of 5 December 1994, 1 in which, inter alia, the commitment to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine was reaffirmed, __________________ 1 A/49/765, annex I. A/RES/73/194 Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov 18-22290 2/2 Supporting the commitment by Ukraine to adhere to international law in its efforts to put an end to the temporary Russian occupation of Crimea, 1. Stresses that the presence of Russian troops in Crimea is contrary to the national sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine and undermines the security and stability of neighbouring countries and the European region; 2. Expresses its grave concern over the progressive militarization of Crimea by the Russian Federation as the occupying Power, and also expresses concern over reports of the continuing destabilization of Crimea owing to transfers by the Russian Federation of weapon systems, including nuclear-capable aircraft and missiles, weapons, ammunition and military personnel to the territory of Ukraine, and urges the Russian Federation to stop such activity; 3. Expresses its concern regarding multiple military exercises of Russian armed forces held in Crimea, which can undermine regional security and entail considerable long-term negative environmental consequences in the region; 4. Also expresses its concern over the Russian Federation’s ongoing actions in parts of the Black Sea surrounding Crimea and the Sea of Azov, including their militarization, which pose further threats to Ukraine and undermine the stability of the broader region; 5. Expresses its utmost concern about the dangerous increase in tensions and the unjustified use of force by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, including against three vessels of the naval forces of Ukraine, namely, the Berdyansk, the Nikopol and the tugboat Yana Kapu, on 25 November 2018 in the Black Sea, as well as the serious wounding of some of their crew members, calls upon the Russian Federation to release the vessels and their crews and equipment unconditionally and without delay, and also calls for the utmost restraint to de-escalate the situation immediately; 6. Calls upon the Russian Federation to refrain from impeding the lawful exercise of navigational rights and freedoms in the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait in accordance with applicable international law, in particular provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; 2 7. Condemns the Russian Federation’s construction and opening of the Kerch Strait bridge between the Russian Federation and temporarily occupied Crimea, which facilitates the further militarization of Crimea, and also condemns the increasing military presence of the Russian Federation in parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, including the Kerch Strait, and the Russian Federation’s harassment of commercial vessels and restriction of international shipping there; 8. Urges the Russian Federation, as the occupying Power, to withdraw its military forces from Crimea and to end its temporary occupation of Ukraine’s territory without delay; 9. Decides to continue its consideration of the matter at its seventy-fourth session. 56th plenary meeting 17 December 2018 __________________ 2 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1833, No. 31363.
Cite this page

UN Project. “A/RES/73/194.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-73-194/. Accessed .