A/RES/73/295 GA
Request for an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965
73
Session
116
Yes
6
No
56
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/73/L.84/Rev.1 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/73/295 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/73/295 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/73/PV.83
-
Afghanistan
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Armenia
-
Bahrain
-
Barbados
-
Belgium
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Chile
-
Colombia
-
Croatia
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
El Salvador
-
Estonia
-
Fiji
-
France
-
Germany
-
Honduras
-
Italy
-
Japan
-
Kuwait
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Latvia
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Mongolia
-
Montenegro
-
Morocco
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
North Macedonia
-
Oman
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Romania
-
Saint Lucia
-
Samoa
-
San Marino
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Sri Lanka
-
Timor-Leste
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Türkiye
-
Tuvalu
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Austria
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Bangladesh
-
Belarus
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cabo Verde
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
China
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Cyprus
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Eswatini
-
Ethiopia
-
Finland
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Grenada
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Ireland
-
Jamaica
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kenya
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Lesotho
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Mali
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Mexico
-
Monaco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nauru
-
Nepal
-
Nicaragua
-
Niger
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Pakistan
-
Palau
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Russian Federation
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Serbia
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
South Sudan
-
Spain
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Tunisia
-
Uganda
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uruguay
-
Vanuatu
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
Speeches following this vote (5)
The President
Before giving the floor for explanations of vote after the voting, I would like to remind delegations that explanations of vote are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
The United Kingdom regrets that today the General Assembly has voted to adopt resolution 73/295. The United Kingdom fully recognizes the importance of the issue of decolonization and the role of the United Nations in that.
As I said in my earlier statement, the United Kingdom sincerely regrets the manner in which Chagossians were removed from the British Indian Ocean Territory in the 1960s and 1…
Colombia recognizes that the issue we are addressing is part of the task of decolonization, which is strongly promoted by the United Nations. Our country has supported and will continue to support efforts that seek the recognition of the right to self-determination and territorial integrity.
At the same time, Colombia values the importance of each advisory opinion of the International Court of J…
El Salvador wishes to explain its position after the voting on resolution 73/295, on the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, (see A/73/773) on which El Salvador has just abstained in the voting.
El Salvador was among the countries that voted in favour of resolution 71/292, through whi…
The President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote for this meeting. We shall hear the remaining speakers at 3 p.m. here in this Hall.
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/73/295
General Assembly
Distr.: General
24 May 2019
19-08474 (E) 290519
*1908474*
Seventy-third session
Agenda item 88
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly
on 22 May 2019
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/73/L.84/Rev.1 and A/73/L.84/Rev.1/Add.1)]
73/295. Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal
consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from
Mauritius in 1965
The General Assembly,
Guided by the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations,
including the inalienable right of self-determination of peoples,
Considering that respect for the obligations arising from the Charter and other
instruments and rules of international law is among the basic purposes and principles
of the United Nations,
Recalling its resolution 71/292 of 22 June 2017, by which it decided, in
accordance with Article 96 of the Charter, to request the International Court of Justice,
pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to render an advisory opinion on
the following two questions relating to the legal consequences of the separation of
the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965:
(a)
“Was the process of decolonization of Mauritius lawfully completed when
Mauritius was granted independence in 1968, following the separation of the Chagos
Archipelago from Mauritius and having regard to international law, including
obligations reflected in General Assembly resolutions 1514 (XV) of 14 December
1960, 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI) of 20 December 1966 and
2357 (XXII) of 19 December 1967?”,
(b)
“What are the consequences under international law, including obligations
reflected in the above-mentioned resolutions, arising from the continued
administration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the
Chagos Archipelago, including with respect to the inability of Mauritius to implement
a programme for the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of its nationals, in
particular those of Chagossian origin?”,
A/RES/73/295
Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences
of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965
19-08474
2/3
Having received the advisory opinion of the Court, rendered on 25 February
2019,1 in which the Court found that:
(a)
“The process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed
when that country acceded to independence in 1968, following the separation of the
Chagos Archipelago”,
(b)
“The United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its
administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible”,
(c)
“All Member States are under an obligation to co-operate with the United
Nations in order to complete the decolonization of Mauritius”,
(d)
“As regards the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of Mauritian
nationals, including those of Chagossian origin, this is an issue relating to the
protection of the human rights of those concerned, which should be addressed by the
General Assembly during the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius”,
Considering that respect for the Court and its functions, including in the exercise
of its advisory jurisdiction, is essential to international law and justice and to an
international order based on the rule of law,
Reaffirming the responsibility of the United Nations, in accordance with
resolution 1514 (XV), to assist in the process of decolonization of Mauritius,
1.
Welcomes the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of
25 February 2019 on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos
Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965;1
2.
Affirms, in accordance with the advisory opinion of the Court, that:
(a)
Because the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago was not based on the
free and genuine expression of the will of the people of Mauritius, the decolonization
of Mauritius has not been lawfully completed;
(b)
The Chagos Archipelago forms an integral part of the territory of
Mauritius;
(c)
Since the decolonization of Mauritius was not conducted in a manner
consistent with the right of peoples to self-determination, it follows that the continued
administration of the Chagos Archipelago by the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland constitutes a wrongful act entailing the international
responsibility of that State;
(d)
The United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its
administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible;
(e)
Since respect for the right to self-determination is an obligation erga
omnes, all States have a legal interest in protecting that right and all Member States
are under an obligation to cooperate with the United Nations in order to complete the
decolonization of Mauritius;
(f)
The resettlement of Mauritian nationals, including those of Chagossian
origin, must be addressed as a matter of urgency during the completion of the
decolonization process;
3.
Demands that the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
withdraw its colonial administration from the Chagos Archipelago unconditionally
within a period of no more than six months from the adoption of the present
resolution, thereby enabling Mauritius to complete the decolonization of its territory
as rapidly as possible;
__________________
1 See A/73/773.
Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences
of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965
A/RES/73/295
3/3
19-08474
4.
Urges the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to
cooperate with Mauritius in facilitating the resettlement of Mauritian nationals,
including those of Chagossian origin, in the Chagos Archipelago, and to pose no
impediment or obstacle to such resettlement;
5.
Calls upon all Member States to cooperate with the United Nations to
ensure the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius as rapidly as possible, and
to refrain from any action that will impede or delay the completion of the process of
decolonization of Mauritius in accordance with the advisory opinion of the Court and
the present resolution;
6.
Calls upon the United Nations and all its specialized agencies to recognize
that the Chagos Archipelago forms an integral part of the territory of Mauritius, to
support the decolonization of Mauritius as rapidly as possible, and to refrain from
impeding that process by recognizing, or giving effect to any measure taken by or on
behalf of, the “British Indian Ocean Territory”;
7.
Calls upon all other international, regional and intergovernmental
organizations, including those established by treaty, to recognize that the Chagos
Archipelago forms an integral part of the territory of Mauritius, to support the
decolonization of Mauritius as rapidly as possible, and to refrain from impeding that
process by recognizing, or giving effect to any measure taken by or on behalf of, the
“British Indian Ocean Territory”;
8.
Requests the Secretary-General to submit a report to the General Assembly
at its seventy-fourth session on the implementation of the present resolution,
including any actions taken by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland and other Member States.
83rd plenary meeting
22 May 2019
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/73/295.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-73-295/. Accessed .