A/RES/76/70 GA
Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
76
Session
62
Yes
22
No
55
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/76/L.22 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/76/70 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/76/70 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/76/PV.48
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Argentina
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Bhutan
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
Colombia
-
Djibouti
-
Ecuador
-
Egypt
-
El Salvador
-
Guinea
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Iraq
-
Jamaica
-
Jordan
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kiribati
-
Kuwait
-
Lebanon
-
Libya
-
Madagascar
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Mexico
-
Mongolia
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nigeria
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Sao Tome and Principe
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Somalia
-
Suriname
-
Thailand
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
United Arab Emirates
-
Uruguay
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Armenia
-
Belarus
-
Plurinational State of Bolivia
-
Cambodia
-
China
-
Cuba
-
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
-
Eritrea
-
Ethiopia
-
Islamic Republic of Iran
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Mali
-
Myanmar
-
Nicaragua
-
Philippines
-
Russian Federation
-
Serbia
-
Sri Lanka
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-
Zimbabwe
-
Afghanistan
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Azerbaijan
-
Bahamas
-
Benin
-
Burkina Faso
-
Burundi
-
Cabo Verde
-
Cameroon
-
Central African Republic
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Dominica
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eswatini
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Ghana
-
Grenada
-
Haiti
-
Japan
-
Kenya
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Malawi
-
Mauritania
-
Mauritius
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Nauru
-
Niger
-
Rwanda
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Saint Lucia
-
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
-
Samoa
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Solomon Islands
-
South Africa
-
South Sudan
-
Sudan
-
Tajikistan
-
Timor-Leste
-
Tonga
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
Uzbekistan
-
Zambia
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Barbados
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Bulgaria
-
Canada
-
Costa Rica
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Denmark
-
Dominican Republic
-
Estonia
-
Finland
-
France
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Latvia
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Montenegro
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
North Macedonia
-
Norway
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
San Marino
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Spain
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Türkiye
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United States of America
-
Vanuatu
Speeches following this vote (15)
The President
Before giving the floor to those wishing to speak in explanation of vote after the voting, I would like to remind delegations that explanations are limited to 10 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats.
I am taking the floor to explain my delegation’s vote in favour of resolution 76/70, which was just adopted. Singapore is a small country. As such, we are deeply committed to multilateralism firmly grounded in respect for international law. We have always supported the principles of respect for territorial integrity, non-interference in the domestic affairs of sovereign States, respect for sovere…
Allow me to take this opportunity to deliver Indonesia’s explanation of vote on the resolution entitled “Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov” (resolution 76/70), which was just adopted.
Indonesia’s principled position remains unchanged. We opposed annexation and illegal terri…
I take the floor to explain my delegation’s vote on resolution 76/70 and to reiterate its position on the Russian- Ukrainian dispute.
We are of the view that the parties concerned should pursue the peaceful resolution of disputes through direct political dialogue to further efforts aimed at achieving a workable solution to the issue, on which agreements were reached in Minsk in 2015 and endorsed…
I am taking the floor today to explain the Mexican delegation’s decision to abstain from the voting on resolution 76/70.
We believe that a resolution of this nature could benefit from the contributions of the members of the Organization, but at the end of the day, the General Assembly had to vote on the draft presented to us by the delegation of Ukraine. We regret that this resolution was not su…
The Republic of Belarus voted against resolution 76/70. It continues to have a consistent position vis-à-vis the inadmissibility of bringing before the General Assembly and its subsidiary organs country-specific draft resolutions that are used exclusively as tools for political accusations. As has been repeatedly noted, the adoption of such documents backfires and only escalates confrontation. By…
My delegation would like to note that our abstaining from the voting on resolution 76/70 does not constitute a departure from our position adopted in 2014, when we voted in favour of
resolution 68/262 and draft Security Council resolution S/2014/189. The Republic of Korea reaffirms its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its in…
The President
We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the voting. We will now hear statements after the adoption of the resolution.
The United States welcomes the adoption of resolution 76/70, entitled, “Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov”.
We thank all of the States Members of the United Nations that joined us in voting in favour of this resolution. By adopting this resolution, the international communi…
I have the honour to speak on behalf of eight Nordic and Baltic countries: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden and my own country, Lithuania.
Let me reiterate our support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. We continue to condemn in the strongest possible terms Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and the i…
The President
I now give the floor to the representative of the European Union, in its capacity as observer.
Mr. Gonzato
I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union (EU) and its member States. The candidate countries the Republic of North Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania, and the European Free Trade Association country Liechtenstein, member of the European Economic Area, as well as Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia, align themselves with this statement.
As reaffirmed by its endorsement o…
I am taking the floor to reaffirm the United Kingdom’s unwavering support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in March 2014 was a flagrant violation of Russia’s international commitments and demonstrated a clear disregard for the Charter of the United Nations, international law …
Poland aligns itself with the statement of the European Union, and I now wish to deliver a statement in my national capacity.
Poland unwaveringly condemns the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation. We continue to deem it contrary to the key principles of the rules-based international order and illegal in the light of international law. We would like to take this opportunity to r…
The President
We have heard the last speaker on this agenda item.
The General Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of sub-item (a) of agenda item 35.
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/76/70
General Assembly
Distr.: General
16 December 2021
21-18574 (E) 221221
*2118574*
Seventy-sixth session
Agenda item 35 (a)
Prevention of armed conflict: prevention of armed conflict
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on
9 December 2021
[without reference to a Main Committee (A/76/L.22 and A/76/L.22/Add.1)]
76/70. Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the
Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
The General Assembly,
Recalling the Charter of the United Nations, in which it was stated, inter alia,
that all Members of the United Nations shall refrain in their international relations
from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence
of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United
Nations,
Recalling also its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, in which it
approved the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United
Nations, and the principles contained therein,
Mindful of the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and
Cooperation in Europe and the Declaration on Principles Guiding Relations between
Participating States contained therein,
Recalling its resolution 68/262 of 27 March 2014 on the territorial integrity of
Ukraine, in which it affirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, political
independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally
recognized borders,
Recalling also its resolutions 73/194 of 17 December 2018, 74/17 of
9 December 2019 and 75/29 of 7 December 2020 on the problem of the militarization
of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well
as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov,
Recalling further its resolutions 71/205 of 19 December 2016, 72/190 of
19 December 2017, 73/263 of 22 December 2018, 74/168 of 18 December 2019 and
A/RES/76/70
Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the
Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
21-18574
2/5
75/192 of 16 December 2020 on the situation of human rights in the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine,
Gravely concerned that the provisions of those resolutions and relevant
decisions of international organizations, specialized agencies and bodies within the
United Nations system have not been implemented by the Russian Federation,
Recalling its resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974, in the annex to
which it was stated, inter alia, that no territorial acquisition or special advantage
resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful,
Condemning the ongoing temporary occupation of part of the territory of
Ukraine, namely, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol
(hereinafter referred to as “Crimea”), by the Russian Federation, and reaffirming the
non-recognition of its annexation,
Recalling that the temporary occupation of Crimea and the threat or use of force
against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine by the Russian
Federation is in contravention of commitments made in the Memorandum on Security
Assurances in Connection with Ukraine’s Accession to the Treaty on the
Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Budapest Memorandum) of 5 December
1994,1 in which, inter alia, the obligations to refrain from the threat or use of force
against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine and the
commitment to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of
Ukraine were reaffirmed,
Deeply concerned by the illegal seizure and establishment of control by the
Russian Federation over the former nuclear weapons storage sites in Crimea, which
may pose a threat to regional and global security,
Expressing concern over the efforts of the Russian Federation to extend its
jurisdiction over the nuclear facilities and material in Crimea, in respect of which the
Agreement between Ukraine and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the
Application of Safeguards in connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons and the Additional Protocol thereto continue to apply,
Expressing concern also about the ongoing deterioration of the international
security and arms control architecture, including as a result of the temporary
occupation by the Russian Federation of the territories of the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, which has had a destabilizing impact on the
international arms control regimes and confidence- and security-building measures,
including those established by the Treaty on Open Skies, the Treaty on Conventional
Armed Forces in Europe 2 and the Vienna Document 2011 on Confidence- and
Security-Building Measures, and rejecting the attempts by the Russian Federation to
advance its narrative about its actions in the temporarily occupied Crimea through the
implementation of international arms control regimes,
Affirming that the seizure of Crimea by force is illegal and a violation of
international law, and affirming also that those territories must be immediately
returned,
Recalling the prohibition, under international humanitarian law, for the
occupying Power to compel protected persons to serve in its armed or auxiliary forces,
including through pressure or propaganda that is aimed at securing voluntary
enlistment, and condemning the ongoing recruitment and conscription campaigns in
__________________
1 A/49/765-S/1994/1399, annex I.
2 See CD/1064.
Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the
Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
A/RES/76/70
3/5
21-18574
Crimea and criminal prosecutions, which include fines, correctional labour and
imprisonment of Crimean residents for draft evasion,
Concerned by efforts to use the education of children in Crimea in order to
indoctrinate them to join the Russian military forces,
Recalling the order of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea of
25 May 2019 on provisional measures in the Case concerning the detention of three
Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) and Procedural Order No. 1
of the Arbitral Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the 1982 United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea between Ukraine and the Russian Federation in
respect of a Dispute concerning the Detention of Ukrainian Naval Vessels and
Servicemen of 22 November 2019,
Noting the fact that security concerns, the unprovoked build-up of forces in and
around Ukraine and the holding of Russian military exercises in the Black Sea and
the Sea of Azov regions, accompanied by closures and restrictions of the lawful
exercise of navigational rights and freedoms, further destabilize the economy and
social services, particularly in the coastal regions of Ukraine,
Supporting the commitment by Ukraine to adhere to international law in its
efforts to put an end to the temporary Russian occupation of Crimea,
Noting the establishment of the International Crimea Platform and the adoption
of the Joint Declaration of the International Crimea Platform Participants,3
1.
Urges the Russian Federation, as the occupying Power, immediately,
completely and unconditionally to withdraw its military forces from Crimea and end
its temporary occupation of the territory of Ukraine without delay;
2.
Calls upon all Member States and relevant international organizations to
cooperate with the United Nations to encourage and support efforts to put an end to
the Russian occupation of Crimea as rapidly as possible and to refrain from any action
or dealing with the Russian Federation regarding Crimea that is inconsistent with this
aim;
3.
Supports commitments and concerted efforts by the international
community, including within international frameworks and the International Crimea
Platform, to address existing and emerging challenges resulting from the progressive
militarization of Crimea and parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, which
undermines security and stability in the region and beyond, and supports the peaceful
de-occupation of Crimea;
4.
Stresses that the presence of Russian troops in Crimea is contrary to the
national sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine and
undermines the security and stability of neighbouring countries and the European
region;
5.
Reiterates its grave concern over the progressive militarization of Crimea
by the Russian Federation, as the occupying Power, namely the continuing
destabilization of Crimea owing to transfers by the Russian Federation of
conventional weapons, including advanced weapon systems, battle tanks, armoured
combat vehicles, nuclear-capable aircraft, helicopters and missiles, as well as small
arms and light weapons, ammunition and military personnel, to the territory of
Ukraine, and urges the Russian Federation to stop such activity without delay;
6.
Calls upon the Russian Federation to engage constructively with
confidence- and security-building and risk reduction mechanisms to build
__________________
3 A/76/503-S/2021/908, annex.
A/RES/76/70
Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the
Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
21-18574
4/5
transparency over its regular military activity in Crimea, which undermines stability,
military predictability and trust in the broader region;
7.
Condemns the use of seized Ukrainian military industry enterprises in the
occupied Crimea by the Russian Federation, including for further development and
build-up of forces;
8.
Calls upon the Russian Federation to refrain from efforts to extend its
jurisdiction over the nuclear facilities and material in Crimea;
9.
Expresses its deep concern over the continued conscription by the Russian
Federation of the residents of Crimea, including those holding Ukrainian citizenship,
into its armed forces, including assignment to military bases in the Russian
Federation, and urges the Russian Federation to stop such activity, which contradicts
international humanitarian law, without delay;
10. Calls upon the Russian Federation to refrain from establishing educational
institutions that provide combat training to Crimean children with the stated aim of
training for military service in the Russian armed forces, to refrain from establishing
combat training courses at Crimean schools and to cease efforts to formally
incorporate Crimean educational institutions into the “military-patriotic” education
system of the Russian Federation;
11.
Reiterates its concern regarding multiple military exercises of Russian
armed forces held in Crimea and parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, which
undermine regional security and entail considerable long-term negative environmental
consequences in the region;
12. Calls upon the Russian Federation to refrain from unlawful activities in
Crimea and parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, including but not limited to
interfering and blocking navigation both for commercial vessels going to and from
ports of Ukraine and for government ships sailing under various flags, which further
exacerbate tensions in the region and beyond;
13. Condemns the construction by the Russian Federation of navy vessels at
the seized shipyards in the temporarily occupied Crimea, which further contributes to
the build-up of forces and poses a threat to regional security and stability;
14. Expresses its concern over the extension of naval bases for the Black Sea
fleet of the Russian Federation in Crimea;
15. Also expresses its concern about the adoption by the Russian Federation
of legislation that grants its National Guard the right to block areas adjacent to certain
infrastructure facilities in Crimea and parts of the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov and the
Kerch Strait, and which therefore may be used to interfere with navigational rights in
violation of international law;
16. Further expresses its concern over the deployment by the Russian
Federation of military and security forces for the protection of the offshore oil
platforms located in the Black Sea, which are the property of Ukraine and which have
been seized by the Russian Federation, thus excluding Ukraine from its maritime
areas, the exploitation by the Russian Federation of the underlying natural resources
in those areas and its usurpation of the jurisdiction of Ukraine there;
17. Expresses its utmost concern about the dangerous increase in tensions and
the unjustified use of force by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, in the Black
Sea, the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait, including the intentional obstruction of
traffic;
18. Calls upon the Russian Federation to return to Ukraine unconditionally
and without delay all equipment and weapons seized from the vessels Berdyansk,
Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of
Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the
Black Sea and the Sea of Azov
A/RES/76/70
5/5
21-18574
Nikopol and the tugboat Yani Kapu during the unjustified use of force by the Russian
Federation on 25 November 2018;
19. Encourages further negotiations to ensure the release by the Russian
Federation of all illegally detained Ukrainian citizens and their safe return to Ukraine;
20. Calls upon the Russian Federation to refrain from impeding the lawful
exercise of navigational rights and freedoms, exercised in accordance with applicable
international law, including provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Sea,4 including but not limited to closure of sea areas under the pretext of
military exercises, in the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait;
21. Condemns the construction and opening by the Russian Federation of the
Kerch Strait bridge and the railway bridge, which form a part of the Tavrida highway
project, between the Russian Federation and the temporarily occupied Crimea, which
facilitates the further militarization of Crimea and restricts the size of vessels that can
reach the Ukrainian ports on the Azov coast;
22. Also condemns the increasing military presence of the Russian Federation
in parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, including the Kerch Strait, and the
harassment by the Russian Federation of commercial vessels and its restriction of
international shipping there, which further aggravates the economic and social
situation in the broader Donetsk region already affected by the temporary occupation
of Crimea and subsequent ongoing destabilizing acts by the Russian Federation;
23. Further condemns visits of Russian officials to the temporarily occupied
Crimea, including those in connection with conducting military exercises, military
parades and other activities;
24. Calls upon all Member States, as well as international organizations and
specialized agencies, to refrain from any visits to Crimea that are not agreed with
Ukraine;
25. Decides to continue its consideration of the matter at its seventy-seventh
session.
48th plenary meeting
9 December 2021
__________________
4 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1833, No. 31363.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/76/70.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-76-70/. Accessed .