A/RES/80/34 GA
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly
80
Session
155
Yes
9
No
11
Abstentions
| Draft symbol | A/C.1/80/L.62 |
|---|---|
| Adopted symbol | A/RES/80/34 |
| Category | POLITICAL AND LEGAL QUESTIONS |
| P5 Positions |
|
| UN Document | A/RES/80/34 ↗ |
Vote Recorded Vote — A/80/PV.52
-
Albania
-
Andorra
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Argentina
-
Australia
-
Austria
-
Bahamas
-
Bahrain
-
Bangladesh
-
Belgium
-
Belize
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-
Botswana
-
Brazil
-
Brunei Darussalam
-
Bulgaria
-
Burkina Faso
-
Cabo Verde
-
Cambodia
-
Cameroon
-
Canada
-
Central African Republic
-
Chad
-
Chile
-
Colombia
-
Comoros
-
Congo
-
Costa Rica
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Croatia
-
Cyprus
-
Czechia
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Denmark
-
Djibouti
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
El Salvador
-
Equatorial Guinea
-
Eritrea
-
Estonia
-
Ethiopia
-
Fiji
-
Finland
-
France
-
Gabon
-
Gambia
-
Georgia
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Greece
-
Guatemala
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Guyana
-
Haiti
-
Honduras
-
Hungary
-
Iceland
-
India
-
Indonesia
-
Iraq
-
Ireland
-
Israel
-
Italy
-
Jamaica
-
Japan
-
Jordan
-
Kenya
-
Kiribati
-
Kuwait
-
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-
Latvia
-
Lesotho
-
Liberia
-
Libya
-
Liechtenstein
-
Lithuania
-
Luxembourg
-
Malawi
-
Malaysia
-
Maldives
-
Malta
-
Marshall Islands
-
Mauritania
-
Mexico
-
Micronesia (Federated States of)
-
Monaco
-
Montenegro
-
Morocco
-
Mozambique
-
Myanmar
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Netherlands
-
New Zealand
-
Nigeria
-
North Macedonia
-
Norway
-
Oman
-
Pakistan
-
Palau
-
Panama
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Paraguay
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Poland
-
Portugal
-
Qatar
-
Republic of Korea
-
Moldova
-
Romania
-
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-
Saint Lucia
-
San Marino
-
Saudi Arabia
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Singapore
-
Slovakia
-
Slovenia
-
Solomon Islands
-
Somalia
-
South Africa
-
Spain
-
Sri Lanka
-
Sudan
-
Suriname
-
Sweden
-
Switzerland
-
Syrian Arab Republic
-
Thailand
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Tunisia
-
Tuvalu
-
Türkiye
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Arab Emirates
-
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-
United Republic of Tanzania
-
United States of America
-
Uruguay
-
Vanuatu
-
Viet Nam
-
Yemen
-
Zambia
Full text of resolution
United Nations
A/RES/80/34
General Assembly
Distr.: General
3 December 2025
25-19826 (E)
*2519826*
Eightieth session
Agenda item 99 (m)
General and complete disarmament: implementation of
the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development,
Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons
and on Their Destruction
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly
on 1 December 2025
[on the report of the First Committee (A/80/534, para. 7)]
80/34. Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
The General Assembly,
Recalling its previous resolutions on the subject of chemical weapons, in
particular resolution 79/56 of 2 December 2024,
Determined to achieve the effective prohibition of the development, production,
acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and their destruction,
Honouring the memory of and paying tribute to all victims of chemical weapons,
Recalling that 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Protocol for the
Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925,1 and
reiterating that the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction 2 reaffirms
principles and objectives of and obligations assumed under that Protocol,
Reaffirming its strong support for the Convention and for the Organisation for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and its deep appreciation of the Organisation,
which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2013 for its extensive efforts to
eliminate chemical weapons,
_______________
1 League of Nations, Treaty Series, vol. XCIV, No. 2138.
2 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1974, No. 33757.
A/RES/80/34
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
25-19826
2/8
Recalling decisions C-24/DEC.4 and C-24/DEC.5 of 27 November 2019
adopted by the Conference of the States Parties at its twenty-fourth session,
introducing changes to schedules 1 (A) and 1, respectively, of the Annex on Chemicals
to the Convention,
Re-emphasizing its unequivocal support for the decision of the Director General
of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to continue the mission
to establish the facts surrounding the allegations of the use of chemical weapons,
including toxic chemicals, for hostile purposes in the Syrian Arab Republic, while
stressing that the safety and security of mission personnel remains the top priority,
and recalling the work, pursuant to Security Council resolutions 2235 (2015) of
7 August 2015 and 2319 (2016) of 17 November 2016, of the Joint Investigative
Mechanism of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and the
United Nations,
Recalling the work related to the Fourth and Fifth Special Sessions of the
Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention, held in The Hague in 2018 and 2023,
Reaffirming the importance of the outcome of the Third Special Session of the
Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention, held in The Hague from 8 to 19 April 2013 (the Third Review
Conference), including its consensus final report, in which the Conference addressed
all aspects of the Convention and made important recommendations on its continued
implementation,
Emphasizing that the Third Review Conference welcomed the fact that the
Convention is a unique multilateral agreement banning an entire category of weapons
of mass destruction in a non‑discriminatory and verifiable manner under strict and
effective international control and noted with satisfaction that the Convention
continues to be a remarkable success and an example of effective multilateralism,
Convinced that the Convention, 28 years after its entry into force, has reinforced
its role as the international norm against chemical weapons, and that it constitutes a
major contribution to:
(a)
International peace and security,
(b)
Eliminating chemical weapons and preventing their re-emergence,
(c)
The ultimate objective of general and complete disarmament under strict
and effective international control,
(d)
Excluding completely, for the sake of all mankind, the possibility of the
use of chemical weapons,
(e)
Promoting international cooperation and exchange in scientific and
technical information in the field of chemical activities among States Parties for
peaceful purposes in order to enhance the economic and technological development
of all States Parties,
1.
Reaffirms its condemnation in the strongest possible terms of the use of
chemical weapons by anyone under any circumstances, emphasizing that any use of
chemical weapons anywhere, at any time, by anyone, under any circumstances is
unacceptable and is and would be a violation of international law and expressing its
strong conviction that those individuals responsible for the use of chemical weapons
must and should be held accountable;
2.
Recalls that article I, paragraph 5, of the Convention on the Prohibition of
the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
A/RES/80/34
3/8
25-19826
Their Destruction provides that each State Party undertakes not to use riot control
agents as a method of warfare, and in this context expresses grave concern about
allegations of their use by the Russian Federation in its war of aggression against
Ukraine and urges the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to
continue to closely monitor the situation and be ready to investigate the matter as
appropriate, notes the requests for clarification on this issue submitted under article
IX of the Convention and subsequent discussions in the Executive Council of the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and recalls the technical
assistance provided to Ukraine by the Technical Secretariat of the Organisation;
3.
Notes with grave concern the reports of the Technical Secretariat of the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of 18 November 2024,3
14 February 20254 and 20 June 20255 following technical assistance visits requested
by
Ukraine,
which
confirmed
the
presence
of
the
riot
control
agent
2‑chlorobenzalmalononitrile (known as CS) in samples collected from locations along
the confrontation lines in the Dnipropetrovsk region;
4.
Condemns in the strongest possible terms the use of a toxic chemical as a
weapon against Alexei Navalny in the Russian Federation, notes with grave concern
the note by the Technical Secretariat of the Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons of 6 October 2020 on the summary of the report on activities
carried out in support of a request for technical assistance by Germany, 6 and
underlines the need for a full and transparent investigation and that those responsible
for the use of chemical weapons against Alexei Navalny must be held accountable;
5.
Also condemns in the strongest possible terms that chemical weapons have
since 2012 been used in Iraq, Malaysia, the Syrian Arab Republic and the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, including as reported by the Joint
Investigative Mechanism of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons and the United Nations and by the Investigation and Identification Team of
the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in the following reports
issued during the Assad rule of the Syrian Arab Republic:
(a)
The reports of the Joint Investigative Mechanism of 24 August 20167 and
21 October 2016,8 which concluded that there was sufficient information to determine
that the Syrian Arab Armed Forces were responsible for the attacks which released
toxic substances in Talmenes, Syrian Arab Republic, on 21 April 2014, in Sarmin,
Syrian Arab Republic, on 16 March 2015, and in Qmenas, Syrian Arab Republic, also
on 16 March 2015, and that the so-called “Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant” used
sulfur mustard in Marea, Syrian Arab Republic, on 21 August 2015;
(b)
The report of the Joint Investigative Mechanism of 26 October 2017,9
which concluded that there was sufficient information to be confident that Islamic
State in Iraq and the Levant was responsible for the use of sulfur mustard at Umm
Hawsh on 15 and 16 September 2016 and that the Syrian Arab Republic was
responsible for the release of sarin at Khan Shaykhun on 4 April 2017;
_______________
3 S/2338/2024.
4 S/2370/2025.
5 S/2415/2025.
6 S/1906/2020.
7 See S/2016/738/Rev.1.
8 See S/2016/888.
9 See S/2017/904, annex.
A/RES/80/34
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
25-19826
4/8
(c)
The first report of the Investigation and Identification Team, of 8 April
2020,10 which concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the Syrian
Arab Air Force used chemical weapons in Ltamenah on 24, 25 and 30 March 2017;
(d)
The second report of the Investigation and Identification Team, of 12 April
2021,11 which concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe that a military
helicopter of the Syrian Arab Air Force carried out a chemical weapons attack on
Saraqib on 4 February 2018;
(e)
The third report of the Investigation and Identification Team, of 27 January
2023,12 which concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the Syrian
Arab Air Force carried out a chemical weapons attack on 7 April 2018 in Duma,
Syrian Arab Republic;
(f)
The fourth report of the Investigation and Identification Team, of
22 February 2024,13 which concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe
that units of Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant used chemical weapons during
attacks on 1 September 2015 in Marea, Syrian Arab Republic;
and demands that the perpetrators be held accountable, noting in this regard that the
Syrian Arab Republic has a vested interest in investigating and holding to account
perpetrators of any use of chemical weapons on its territory;
6.
Recognizes that the secretive nature of the former regime’s chemical
weapons programme continues to pose significant challenges to the Syrian Arab
Republic in identifying and eliminating any remaining chemical weapons, production
facilities and related materials and equipment, and also recognizes that these
challenges are compounded by gaps in documentation, limited institutional memory
and technical expertise, economic constraints, insufficient equipment and security
threats;
7.
Welcomes the recent positive cooperation by the new Government of the
Syrian Arab Republic with the Technical Secretariat of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and the designation of a national team to facilitate
implementation of the obligations of the Syrian Arab Republic under the Convention;
8.
Reiterates the importance of clarifying all outstanding issues related to the
initial declaration by the Syrian Arab Republic, obtaining clarifications on the full
extent and scope of the Assad-era Syrian chemical weapons programme as well as
verifying and destroying its possible remnants, and ensuring long-term compliance
by the Syrian Arab Republic with the Convention;
9.
Calls upon States Parties in a position to do so to provide, upon request,
appropriate technical assistance and equipment, training, funding and capacity-
building support to the Syrian Arab Republic, in order to help address its technical
and institutional challenges to identify and safely destroy any remaining elements of
the former regime’s chemical weapons programme, in accordance with the objectives
of the Convention;
10. Welcomes decision EC-110/DEC.1 of the Executive Council, entitled
“Expedited on-site Destruction of any remnants of chemical weapons in the Syrian
Arab Republic”, of 8 October 2025;
_______________
10 See S/2020/310, annex.
11 See S/2021/371, annex.
12 See S/2023/81, annex.
13 See S/2024/200, annex.
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
A/RES/80/34
5/8
25-19826
11.
Recalls:
(a)
The reports of the fact-finding mission of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons regarding alleged incidents in Ltamenah, 14
Saraqib15 and Duma,16 Syrian Arab Republic, as well as reports regarding the alleged
incidents in Marea17 and Kafr Zayta,18 Syrian Arab Republic, which concluded there
were reasonable grounds to believe that a toxic chemical or a vesicant chemical
substance from 1.A.04 scheduled chemicals under the Convention had been used as a
weapon;
(b)
The report of the fact-finding mission of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of 28 June 2023,19 which concluded that
information obtained and analysed by the fact-finding mission did not provide
reasonable grounds to determine that chemicals were used as a weapon in the reported
incidents that occurred in Kharbit Massasneh, Syrian Arab Republic, on 7 July and
4 August 2017;
(c)
The report of the fact-finding mission of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of 22 February 2024,20 which concluded that
information obtained and analysed by the fact-finding mission did not provide
reasonable grounds to determine that toxic chemicals were used as a weapon in the
reported incident that occurred in Al-Yarmouk, Syrian Arab Republic, on 22 October
2017;
(d)
The report of the fact-finding mission of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of 11 June 2024,21 which concluded that
information obtained and analysed by the fact-finding mission did not provide
reasonable grounds to determine that toxic chemicals were used as a weapon in the
reported incidents that occurred on 9 August 2017 in Qalib al-Thawr and on
8 November 2017 in al-Balil, Syrian Arab Republic;
12. Also recalls the adoption of:
(a)
Decision C-SS-4/DEC.3 of the Fourth Special Session of the Conference
of the States Parties, entitled “Addressing the threat from chemical weapons use”, of
27 June 2018;
(b)
Decision EC-94/DEC.2 of the Executive Council, entitled “Addressing the
possession and use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Arab Republic”, of 9 July
2020;
(c)
Decision C-25/DEC.9 of the Conference of the States Parties, entitled
“Addressing the possession and use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Arab
Republic”, of 21 April 2021;
(d)
Decision C-28/DEC.12 of the Conference of the States Parties, entitled
“Addressing the threat from chemical weapons use and the threat of future use”, of
30 November 2023;
and stresses the importance of their implementation, in accordance with the
Convention, and, accordingly, expresses concern with the conclusions contained in
_______________
14 See S/2017/931, annex, and S/2018/620, annex.
15 See S/2018/478, annex.
16 See S/2019/208, annex.
17 See S/2022/85, annex.
18 See S/2022/116, annex.
19 See S/2023/508, annex.
20 See S/2024/214, annex.
21 See S/2024/486, annex.
A/RES/80/34
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
25-19826
6/8
the report of the Director General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons of 14 October 2020 on the implementation of decision EC-94/DEC.2;22
13. Reiterates its grave concern that, despite the verified destruction of all 27
chemical weapons production facilities declared by the Syrian Arab Republic during
the Assad era, the Technical Secretariat, as reported by the Director General in his
report of 24 September 2025,23 assessed that the Syrian Arab Republic had submitted
a declaration that still could not be considered accurate and complete in accordance
with
the
Convention,
Executive
Council
decisions
EC-M-33/DEC.1
and
EC‑94/DEC.2 and Security Council resolution 2118 (2013) of 27 September 2013, as
well as with the conclusion of decision C-SS-4/DEC.3 of the Fourth Special Session
of the Conference of the States Parties that the Syrian Arab Republic had failed to
declare and destroy all of its chemical weapons and chemical weapons production
facilities, and underscores the importance of such full verification;
14. Recognizes the distinct historical and institutional context in which the
chemical weapons programme was developed and operated under the former Syrian
regime and the ongoing efforts of the new Government of the Syrian Arab Republic
to cooperate with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and to
fulfil the country’s obligations under the Convention;
15. Recalls decision C-26/DEC.10 of the Conference of the States Parties,
entitled “Understanding regarding the aerosolised use of central nervous system-
acting chemicals for law enforcement purposes”, of 1 December 2021;
16. Emphasizes that the universality of the Convention is essential to
achieving its object and purpose and to enhancing the security of States Parties, as
well as to international peace and security, underlines the fact that the objectives of
the Convention will not be fully realized as long as there remains even a single State
not party to the Convention that could possess or acquire such weapons, calls upon
all States that have not yet done so to become Parties to the Convention without delay,
and in this regard recalls the outcome of the Third Special Session of the Conference
of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention
(the Third Review Conference);
17. Welcomes the confirmation by the Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons of the full destruction of all declared chemical weapons
stockpiles, and notes that the last chemical weapon from a declared stockpile was
verified as destroyed in July 2023;
18. Underlines that the end of destruction of all declared chemical weapons
stockpiles is an important milestone for the Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons and a critical step towards achieving its mission to permanently
eliminate all chemical weapons;
19. Also underlines the fact that the full, effective and non‑discriminatory
implementation of all articles of the Convention makes a major contribution to
international peace and security through the elimination of declared stockpiles of
chemical weapons and the prohibition of their acquisition and use, and provides for
assistance and protection in the event of use or threat of use of chemical weapons and
for international cooperation for peaceful purposes in the field of chemical activities;
20. Notes the impact of scientific and technological progress, including
challenges and opportunities arising from the rapid development of artificial
intelligence, on the effective implementation of the Convention and the importance
_______________
22 EC-96/DG.1.
23 EC-110/DG.15.
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
A/RES/80/34
7/8
25-19826
for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and its policymaking
organs of taking due account of such developments;
21. Reaffirms that the obligation of the States Parties to complete the
destruction of chemical weapons stockpiles and the destruction or conversion of
chemical weapons production facilities in accordance with the provisions of the
Convention and the Annex on Implementation and Verification (Verification Annex)
and under the verification of the Technical Secretariat of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is essential for the realization of the object and
purpose of the Convention;
22. Stresses the importance to the Convention that all possessors of chemical
weapons, chemical weapons production facilities or chemical weapons development
facilities, including previously declared possessor States, should be among the States
Parties to the Convention, and welcomes progress to that end;
23. Notes with concern that, along with the threat of the possible production,
acquisition and use of chemical weapons by States, the international community also
faces the danger of the production, acquisition and use of chemical weapons by
non‑State actors, including terrorists, concerns which have highlighted the necessity
of achieving universal adherence to the Convention, as well as the high level of
readiness of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and stresses
that the full and effective implementation of all provisions of the Convention,
including those on national implementation (article VII) and assistance and protection
(article X), constitutes an important contribution to the efforts of the United Nations
in the global fight against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations;
24. Notes that the effective application of the verification system builds
confidence in compliance with the Convention by States Parties;
25. Stresses the importance of the Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons in verifying compliance with the provisions of the Convention as
well as in promoting the timely and efficient accomplishment of all its objectives;
26. Urges all States Parties to the Convention to meet in full and on time their
obligations under the Convention and to support the Organisation for the Prohibition
of Chemical Weapons in its implementation activities;
27. Welcomes the progress made in the national implementation of article VII
obligations, commends the States Parties and the Technical Secretariat for assisting
other States Parties, on request, with the implementation of the follow-up to the plan
of action regarding article VII obligations, urges States Parties that have not fulfilled
their obligations under article VII to do so without further delay, in accordance with
their constitutional processes, and in this context reaffirms that full, effective and
non‑discriminatory implementation of article VII is essential for the realization of the
object and purpose of the Convention;
28. Emphasizes the continuing relevance and importance of the provisions of
article X of the Convention, welcomes the activities of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in relation to assistance and protection against
chemical weapons, supports further efforts by both States Parties and the Technical
Secretariat to promote a high level of readiness to respond to chemical weapons
threats as articulated in article X, and welcomes the effectiveness and efficiency of
the increased focus on making full use of regional and subregional capacities and
expertise, including taking advantage of established training centres;
29. Reaffirms that the provisions of the Convention shall be implemented in a
manner that avoids hampering the economic or technological development of States
Parties and international cooperation in the field of chemical activities for purposes
A/RES/80/34
Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the
Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
Weapons and on Their Destruction
25-19826
8/8
not prohibited under the Convention, including the international exchange of
scientific and technical information, and chemicals and equipment for the production,
processing or use of chemicals for purposes not prohibited under the Convention;
30. Emphasizes the importance of the provisions of article XI of the
Convention relating to the economic and technological development of States Parties,
recalls that the full, effective and non‑discriminatory implementation of those
provisions contributes to universality, and reaffirms the undertaking of the States
Parties to foster international cooperation for peaceful purposes in the field of
chemical activities of the States Parties and the importance of that cooperation and its
contribution to the promotion of the Convention as a whole;
31. Notes with appreciation the ongoing work of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to achieve the object and purpose of the
Convention, to ensure the full implementation of its provisions, including those for
international verification of compliance with it, and to provide a forum for
consultation and cooperation among States Parties;
32. Regrets that, despite the constructive engagement of most of the States
Parties in the preparatory process leading to the Fifth Special Session of the
Conference of the States Parties to Review the Operation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention, it was not possible to adopt a final document, notwithstanding the fact
that the majority of subjects covered at the Fifth Review Conference received very
broad support and that a wide range of delegations undertook efforts towards a
consensual outcome;
33. Welcomes the opening of the Centre for Chemistry and Technology, which
strengthens the capabilities of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons and its member States to implement the Convention, uphold the global norm
against chemical weapons, address threats and opportunities arising from rapid
progress in science and technology in the evolving global security landscape and
support international cooperation;
34. Takes note of decision EC-102/DEC.6 of the Executive Council, entitled
“Allowing the convening of Executive Council meetings or sessions in extraordinary
circumstances”, of 16 March 2023;
35. Welcomes the cooperation between the United Nations and the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons within the framework of the
relationship agreement between the United Nations and the Organisation, 24 in
accordance with the provisions of the Convention;
36. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its eighty-first session,
under the item entitled “General and complete disarmament”, the sub-item entitled
“Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development,
Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction”.
52nd plenary meeting
1 December 2025
_______________
24 United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2160, No. 1240.
▶ Cite this page
UN Project. “A/RES/80/34.” UN Project, https://un-project.org/votes/resolution/A-RES-80-34/. Accessed .